Abstract
The identification of cancer preventive or therapeutic substances as well as carcinogenic risk assessment of chemicals is nowadays mostly dependent on animal studies. In vitro cell transformation assays mimic different stages of the in vivo neoplastic process and represent an excellent alternative to study carcinogenesis and therapeutic options. In the BALB/c-3T3 two-stage transformation assay cells are chemically transformed by treatment with MCA and TPA, along with the final Giemsa staining of morphological aberrant foci. In addition to the standard method we can show, that it is possible to apply other chemicals in parallel to identify potential preventive or therapeutic substances during the transformation process. Furthermore, we successfully combined the BALB/c cell transformation assay with several endpoint applications for protein analysis (immunoblot, subcellular fractionation and immunofluorescence) or energy parameter measurements (glucose and oxygen consumption) to elucidate cancer mechanisms in more detail. In our opinion the BALB/c cell transformation assay proves to be an excellent model to investigate alterations in key proteins or energy parameters during the different stages of transformation as well as therapeutic substances and their mode of action.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide and the number of new cases is expected to rise about 70% over the next two decades. More than 30% of cancer can be prevented by avoiding risk factors and others can be detected early or treated accurately1. Drug development for cancer therapy is time consuming and cost-intensive and most of the compounds fail the initial research phases in human2,3. To minimize the number of promising compounds analyzed in numerous and long-lasting animal studies it is important to better understand the mode of action and prospects of suitable drug candidates. Hence, we need a basic technology that allows us to screen for new therapeutic substances and ideally to study their mode of action.
Malignant cell transformation in vitro is described as a progressive process through qualitatively different stages4 and the involved cellular and molecular events are similar to those of in vivo multistage carcinogenesis5. The phenomenon of cell transformation involves phenotypic alterations (e.g. spindle-shaped morphology; basophilic staining), changes in growth behavior and control (e.g. immortality, multi-layered and acquisition of anchorage independent growth) as well as tumorigenicity when applied in susceptible animals2,5,6,7,8. After chemical treatment, these assays monitor the induction of malignant features in mammalian cells and their transition from normal to transformed cells2,8. In the last years a great effort was made to develop and validate alternative methods like the in vitro cell transformation assays (CTAs) to avoid unnecessary carcinogenicity testing with animals9. Although CTAs don’t simulate the whole in vivo neoplastic process, they can provide essential information regarding the identification of potential carcinogens and there mode of action10. Furthermore, they are faster, less expensive than the 2-year rodent bioassays and to date the only well-established method with the potential to detect both genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens8,11.
There are two main CTAs used: the Syrian hamster embryo cell (SHE) assay developed by Berwald and Sachs7 and the BALB/c-3T3 cell transformation assay (BALB-CTA) according to Kakunaga12. The SHE assay is designed of target cells onto a feeder layer, which are treated with chemical agents 24 hours after seeding up to 7 days5. This method is intended to detect early stages of carcinogenicity and leads to morphologically transformed colonies13. Several modifications of the classical method had been carried out, like the use of medium with pH 6.714,15 or an initiation-promotion protocol16.
The BALB-CTA is based on the immortalized embryonic mouse fibroblasts BALB/c-3T317 using the subclone A31-1-1 by Kakunaga and Crow18. BALB/c-3T3 cells form normally a monolayer culture and get contact-inhibited after reaching confluence. Upon treatment with chemical agents, some cells do not stop proliferation and grow as morphologically aberrant foci over the monolayer of normal cells2,6. The original procedure consists of a 3 day exposure time to chemicals, 24 hours after seeding12,19. Cultures are further maintained 4 to 6 weeks with two medium changes a week until fixation with methanol. Morphologically transformed foci can be visualized by basophilic staining with Giemsa and therefore classified in three different types of foci9. Different improvements of the standard protocol were proposed, like a two-stage assay with treatment of suspected carcinogens followed by a known tumor promotor20, the use of the new developed Bhas 42 cell line (BALB/c-3T3 transfected with v-Ha-ras)21,22,23 or the combination of the BALB-CTA with microarray-based toxicogenomics24.
Despite the identification of potential tumor initiators and promotors by using cell transformation assays as standard toxicological methods we further improved the BALB-CTA for mechanistic cancer research. Here we present, that the classical two-stage model of the BALB-CTA can be combined with a parallel treatment of interesting substances to drive cell colony formation up or down. In addition, we successfully expanded the BALB-CTA for several endpoint applications, like analysis of protein level and signaling (westernblot, immunofluorescence, subcellular fractionation) as well as parameters of energy metabolism (glucose and oxygen consumption). Thereby, the BALB-CTA is most suitable for providing essential information regarding key proteins and their signalling during the different stages of transformation and to identify potential cancer therapeutics.
Results and Discussion
The BALB-CTA mimics some stages of in vivo carcinogenicity and is designed to evaluate the formation of morphological aberrant foci by several chemicals. In the standard two-stage model (Fig. 1A) cells are treated with a known tumor initiator for 72 h one day after seeding. After 4 days with normal medium the additional treatment with a known tumor promotor from day 8 to 20 leads to transformation of cells, which start to grow over the normal contact-inhibited monolayer. Until day 42 the cells receive normal medium twice a week and are finally fixed with methanol. The morphological aberrant foci can be visualized by basophilic staining with Giemsa and if required, can be classified into three different types of foci9. Reproducibility and efficiency of the BALB-CTA protocol was shown by the effects of well-known carcinogens. DMSO is used in the standard BALB-CTA as the solvent negative control and leads to no Giemsa stained foci at all (Fig. 1A). The separate usage of the tumor initiator MCA or tumor promotor TPA leads as expected to a small amount of transformed cell foci6,25. Nevertheless, only the combination of MCA treatment followed by TPA is highly efficient in cell transformation and leads to an enormous multilayer growth, which appears dark blue after Giemsa staining25,26. The usage of other known tumor initiators like MNNG27 and promotors like insulin, zinc chloride and sodium orthovanadate28 are also possible with this method (Fig. 1B) and only differ in the amount of arising cell colonies. Another possibility of the BALB-CTA is the additional treatment to MCA/TPA with a substance of interest for cancer prevention or therapy, which we demonstrated as an example with the short-chain fatty acid butyrate. Consistently to the described chemopreventive properties of butyrate in the literature29,30, a treatment with butyrate during the whole assay (day 1 to 42) leads to a concentration dependent decrease in cell transformation (Fig. 2A) and a clearly morphological change of the cells (Fig. 2B). These findings impressively show, that the BALB-CTA is not limited to evaluate potential carcinogens as a standard toxicological method, but can be also helpful to find and characterize cancer prevention and therapy candidates.
To further evaluate the underlying mechanisms of decreased cell transformation, a first step was to transfer the BALB/c two-stage model from the classical 6-well plate into a wide range of plate and dish formats (Supplementary Fig. S1). The 96-well plate is quite useful to test several substances in a high-throughput manner, whereas the use of a 10-cm dish is needed to achieve high amounts of protein or cells. For fluorescence analysis and high-end microscopy the different μ-slides form ibidi proved to be quite beneficial. Adequate protocol performance for other cell culture formats was verified by treatment with MCA and TPA with additional Giemsa staining.
Only the successful adaption of the BALB-CTA into other culture systems made it possible to combine the assay with several endpoint applications and meet their special requirements. All these methods can be performed at any time point of the whole transformation protocol (Fig. 3A) and this makes it possible to understand the multistep process of cell transformation in more detail. For mechanistic research it is quite important to look at changes in protein expression and activation, to identify responsible key proteins during the cell transformation process. A BALB-CTA with control and MCA/TPA treated cells was performed and combined with a time-dependent immunoblot analysis of selected proteins (Fig. 3B). The known marker for proliferation PCNA (Proliferating cell nuclear antigen) showed for all time points of the transformation assay a basal expression in the control cells and an increase with MCA/TPA treatment. Proliferation and PCNA activation is stimulated at day 11 and 17 by TPA treatment probably by activation of protein kinase C31,32. Further PCNA expression after the cell promotion phase is still higher, which is due to the increasing proliferation of the transformed cells in the foci. We also detected in the MCA/TPA treated cells an increase in the phosphorylation of the S6 protein and the cleavage of caspase 3 over time. The activation of the mTOR/p70S6 kinase signaling pathway has been found in a lot of different human cancer types and is a target for treatment strategies33,34. The elevated apoptosis can be compared to cellular death seen in the inner core of solid tumors or similar in vitro models due to insufficient oxygen or nutrient supply35.
With immunoblot analysis we can get a first idea which proteins can be involved when cells are treated with MCA/TPA or other substances, but we cannot differentiate between the signals of the transformed cell foci itself and the surrounding monolayer of normal cells. Therefore, to further investigate the precise location and activation of different proteins, we established the analysis by confocal immunofluorescence with up to three dyes. This method can be performed at any time of the transformation process, but adequate colony formation is beneficial. Thus, it was possible to ascribe the cleaved caspase 3 signal at day 33 to the developed cell foci itself and was not detectable in the surrounding monolayer of normal cells (Fig. 3C). These findings confirmed our results obtained by immunoblot analysis and made them even more comprehensible. Afterwards it is still possible to stain the existing foci with Giemsa for further characterization. An alternative method to analyze spatiotemporal protein changes, is the application of subcellular fractionation. We applied a fractionation protocol by Holden and Horten36 to our BALB/c cells and can differentiate between enriched fractions of the cytosol, organelles and nucleus. Successful fractionation was tested by performing immunoblots with typical proteins of the enriched fractions, like GSK 3β for cytosolic, cytochrome c for organellar and Lamin A for the nuclear fraction (Fig. 3D). This method makes it possible to detect alterations in the subcellular location of target proteins, for example transcription factors which translocate from the cytosol to the nucleus to hit their targets. Subcellular fractionation can be arranged, as all the other endpoint methods, at any day of the transformation protocol and can help to identify changes in initiation (day 1–4), promotion (day 8–21) or post-promotion phase (day 21–42) of the transformation assay.
From epidemiological studies and observations in human tumor types we know, that changes in energy metabolism can contribute to malignant cell transformation37. Therefore, we combined the BALB-CTA with measurements of energy metabolism, like glucose and oxygen consumption. In an early stage of transformation we detected an increase in glucose as well as oxygen consumption in the MCA/TP treated cells, which can be explained with the massive proliferation of the transformed cells (Fig. 3E,F). These methods in combination with the BALB-CTA gives us the possibility to monitor alterations in energy consumption at any day of the transformation process and learn more about the mode of action of preventive or harmful substances.
The BALB-CTA proves to be more than a toxicological method for chemical risk assessment to evaluate the initiating and promoting properties of chemicals. The successful transfer into other cell culture systems and combination with endpoint methods for protein analysis or energy parameter measurements make the BALB-CTA quite useful for mechanistic cancer research. This cheap alternative to rodent bioassays can provide valuable information of alterations of key proteins or cell metabolism during the whole transformation process in future. Moreover, the two-stage BALB-CTA can be combined with the additional treatment of preventive or therapeutic substances and can be helpful to investigate new treatment strategies.
Materials and Methods
Cell transformation protocol (CTA)
BALB/c-3T3-A31-1-1 (Hatano Research Institute, Japan) cells were cultured in DMEM/HAM’s F-12 (Biochrom #T481-10) containing 3 g/l D-glucose, 5% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin, to avoid unnecessary condition changes prior to the experiment. Cells were routinely maintained in a humidified incubator (37 °C, 5% CO2, 95% humidity) and only sub-confluent cells (about 70% confluence) were used for the CTA. The two-stage approach of the in vitro cell transformation assay with an initiation and promotion phase, is comparable to in vivo experiments38,39. The BALB/c 3T3 cell transformation assay was performed with some modifications to the recommended protocol of the EVCAM prevalidation study40. In order to create the same conditions during the whole experiment for further analysis in the initiation (day 1–4), promotion (day 8–21) or post-promotion phase (day 21–42), only DMEM/HAM’s F-12 medium was used, which proved to be very effective concerning the foci forming potential41. The duration of the assay was set to 42 days, to obtain sufficient colony formation. In our standard assay 5000 cells per well were seeded into 4 replicates of Corning® Primaria™ 6-well plates (VWR #734-0077) and cultured under standard conditions (37 °C, 5% CO2, 95% humidity) for 42 days. Medium changes took place every third or fourth day (see pattern of treatment), with additional treatment of 0.5 μg/ml MCA (3-Methylcholanthrene, Sigma #213942) on day 1 to 4 and 0,3 μg/ml TPA (12-O-Tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetat, Sigma #79346) on day 8, 11, 15, 18 until day 21. Other substances of interest can be applied either completely (day 1–42) or just in the initiation (day 1–4), promotion (day 8–21) or even post-promotion phase (day 21–42) to analyze their effect on colony formation. After 42 days cells were washed twice with PBS, fixed with PBS/methanol (50:50) for 3 min and 100% ice-cold methanol for 10 min and washed twice with methanol. For analyzing the tumor forming potential cells were further stained with Giemsa (AppliChem #A0885) and transformed cell foci appear blue colored. Giemsa staining was achieved as followed: 3 min Giemsa solution (1 ml/well), adding deionized water (3 ml/well) for further 3 min, 5 times washing with tab water followed by 5 × 10 min washing with deionized water on the shaker. Other substances applied in the BALB/c assay were 1 μg/ml MNNG according to Ao et al.27, 20 μg/ml Insulin, 7.5 μg/ml ZnCl2 and 1 μg/ml Na3VO4 on the basis of Maeshima et al.28. Butyrate concentrations of 5, 10 or 20 mM were not tolerated by the BALB/c cells (data not shown), why 1 mM and below was chosen as concentrations for the CTA.
Protein extraction and immunodetection
Protein samples were prepared by lysing (Cell signaling lysis buffer) and sonicating (Bandelin Sonopuls, Berlin, Germany) of the cells and quantified according to Bradford’s method42. SDS-PAGE was performed with a 10% gel and 30 μg protein extract per lane. The separated proteins were transferred to a PVDF membrane by semi-dry western blotting, followed by incubation with different antibodies. Antibodies used were PCNA (Cell Signaling #2586), p-S6 (Cell Signaling #2211), cleaved Caspase 3 (Cell Signaling #9664), anti-rabbit (Cell Signaling #7074) and α-Tubulin (Sigma T9026).
Detection of glucose in culture medium
Cells were treated according to the standard cell transformation protocol in a 6-well plate. On day 11 medium was changed to DMEM/HAM’s F-12 without phenol red in preparation of the glucose determination (3 g/l glucose) and cells were further maintained without phenol red for the rest of the experiment. After medium change on day 15 medium samples for each well were collected. Cells were maintained for further 3 days (until day 18) and another sample of the consumed medium was collected. Glucose concentrations of the medium samples (without phenol red) were analyzed with the Glucose Assay Kit by Sigma (#GAGO20) following the manual instructions. Glucose consumption after 3 days of incubation was calculated.
Oxygen consumption
Oxygen consumption was measured by using a Clark-type electrode (Hansatech Instruments; Norfolk, UK). Therefore cells were washed, trypsinized and counted with a Neubauer chamber. A solution of 2 Mio cells was filled into the air-tight and 37 °C tempered Clark electrode chamber to monitor the respiration rate for 5 min. Available Oxygen in the chamber passes through the teflon membrane to reduce the platinum cathode, meanwhile the silver anode is oxidized. The produced current by the electron shifting was used to calculate the respiration rate.
Subcellular fractionation
Fractionation of cultured cells in 6-well plate format was done according to a protocol by Holden and Horten36. Fractions enriched for cytosolic proteins (digitonin-buffer: 150 mM NaCl; 50 mM HEPES; pH 7.4; 25 μg/ml digitonin), membrane bound organellar proteins (IGEPAL-buffer: 150 mM NaCl; 50 mM HEPES; pH 7.4; 1% IGEPAL) and nuclear proteins (RIPA-buffer: 150 mM NaCl; 50 mM HEPES; pH 7.4; 0.5% sodium desoxycholate; 0.1% SDS; 1 U/ml benzonase) were isolated and quantified by Bradford’s method42. Successful fractionation can be tested by performing immunoblots with 5 μg protein per lane and antibodies against GSK3-β for cytosol proteins (Cell Signaling #9315), Cytochrome c for organelles (BD Bioscience #556433) and Lamin A for nuclear proteins (Sigma L1293).
Confocal immunofluorescence microscopy
Cells were treated according to the standard cell transformation protocol in a μ-slide 8-well (ibidi #80826). After 33 days cells were washed with PBS and fixed for 20 min with 2% para-formaldehyde and 10 min with 0.1% Triton® X-100. After washing with 1% bovine serum albumin as blocking solution (BSA) cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (Sigma D9542) and actin filaments with Alexa Fluor® 647 Phalloidin (Cell Signaling #8940). Afterwards the primary antibody cleaved Caspase 3 (Cell Signaling #9664) was applied, followed by the secondary antibody anti-rabbit (Cell Signaling #4412). Washing 2× with BSA was done between each incubation. Finally cells were covered with ibidi mounting medium (ibidi #50001) and analyzed with a Zeiss LSM 780 confocal microscope. After immunofluorescence analysis mounting medium can be washed away with 3× PBS and cells can be further stained with Giemsa.
Statistical analysis
Calculations of statistical differences of glucose and oxygen consumption measurements were assessed according to a two sample Student’s t-test (equal variances). A probability value of p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Poburski, D. and Thierbach, R. Improvement of the BALB/c-3T3 cell transformation assay: a tool for investigating cancer mechanisms and therapies. Sci. Rep. 6, 32966; doi: 10.1038/srep32966 (2016).
References
Stewart, B. W. & Wild, C. P. World Cancer Report 2014. IARC (2014) http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/en/(08.02.2016).
Mascolo, M. G. et al. BALB/c 3T3 cell transformation assay for the prediction of carcinogenic potential of chemicals and environmental mixtures. Toxicol In Vitro 24, 1292–1300 (2010).
Perrin, S. Preclinical research: Make mouse studies work. Nature 507, 423–425 (2014).
Barrett, J. C. & Ts’o, P. O. Evidence for the progressive nature of neoplastic transformation in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75, 3761–3765 (1978).
OECD. Detailed review paper on cell transformation assays for detection of chemical carcinogens (2007).
Sakai, A. BALB/c 3T3 cell transformation assays for the assessment of chemical carcinogenicity. Japanese Society for Alternatives to Animal Experiments 14, 367–373 (2007).
Berwald, Y. & Sachs, L. I. N. Vitro cell transformation with chemical carcinogens. Nature 200, 1182–1184 (1963).
Schechtman, L. M. Rodent cell transformation assays-a brief historical perspective. Mutat Res 744, 3–7 (2012).
Sasaki, K. et al. Photo catalogue for the classification of foci in the BALB/c 3T3 cell transformation assay. Mutat Res 744, 42–53 (2012).
Vanparys, P. et al. Application of in vitro cell transformation assays in regulatory toxicology for pharmaceuticals, chemicals, food products and cosmetics. Mutat Res 744, 111–116 (2012).
Corvi, R. et al. ECVAM prevalidation study on in vitro cell transformation assays: general outline and conclusions of the study. Mutat Res 744, 12–19 (2012).
Kakunaga, T. A quantitative system for assay of malignant transformation by chemical carcinogens using a clone derived from BALB-3T3. Int J Cancer 12, 463–473 (1973).
Isfort, R. J. & LeBoeuf, R. A. Application of in vitro cell transformation assays to predict the carcinogenic potential of chemicals. Mutat Res 365, 161–173 (1996).
LeBoeuf, R. A. & Kerckaert, G. A. The induction of transformed-like morphology and enhanced growth in Syrian hamster embryo cells grown at acidic pH. Carcinogenesis 7, 1431–1440 (1986).
LeBoeuf, R. A. & Kerchaert, G. A. Enhanced morphological transformation of early passage Syrian hamster embryo cells cultured in medium with a reduced bicarbonate concentration and pH. Carcinogenesis 8, 689–697 (1987).
Chouroulinkov, I. & Lasne, C. Two-stage (initiation-promotion) carcinogenesis in vivo and in vitro. Bull Cancer 65, 255–264 (1978).
Aaronson, S. A. & Todaro, G. J. Development of 3T3-like lines from Balb-c mouse embryo cultures: transformation susceptibility to SV40. J Cell Physiol 72, 141–148 (1968).
Kakunaga, T. & Crow, J. D. Cell variants showing differential susceptibility to ultraviolet light--induced transformation. Science 209, 505–507 (1980).
Group, I. N. E. W. Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Cell Transformation and Standardization of Transformation Assays of Established Cell Lines for the Prediction of Carcinogenic Chemicals: Overview and Recommended Protocols. Cancer Res 45, 2395–2399 (1985).
Sakai, A. & Sato, M. Improvement of carcinogen identification in BALB/3T3 cell transformation by application of a 2-stage method. Mutat Res 214, 285–296 (1989).
Asada, S. et al. Detection of initiating as well as promoting activity of chemicals by a novel cell transformation assay using v-Ha-ras-transfected BALB/c 3T3 cells (Bhas 42 cells). Mutat Res 588, 7–21 (2005).
Sakai, A. et al. A Bhas 42 cell transformation assay on 98 chemicals: the characteristics and performance for the prediction of chemical carcinogenicity. Mutat Res 702, 100–122 (2010).
Sakai, A. et al. An international validation study of a Bhas 42 cell transformation assay for the prediction of chemical carcinogenicity. Mutat Res 725, 57–77 (2011).
Vaccari, M. et al. Identification of pathway-based toxicity in the BALB/c 3T3 cell model. Toxicol In Vitro 29, 1240–1253 (2015).
Sakai, A. Orthovanadate, an inhibitor of protein tyrosine phosphatases, acts more potently as a promoter than as an initiator in the BALB/3T3 cell transformation. Carcinogenesis 18, 1395–1399 (1997).
Umeda, M. Cell transformation assay using Balb/c 3T3 cells or Bhas 42 cells for the efficient detection of tumour promoters. Altern Lab Anim 32 Suppl 1B, 673–677 (2004).
Ao, L. et al. Comparison of gene expression profiles in BALB/c 3T3 transformed foci exposed to tumor promoting agents. Toxicol In Vitro 24, 430–438 (2010).
Maeshima, H., Ohno, K., Tanaka-Azuma, Y., Nakano, S. & Yamada, T. Identification of tumor promotion marker genes for predicting tumor promoting potential of chemicals in BALB/c 3T3 cells. Toxicol In Vitro 23, 148–157 (2009).
McIntyre, A., Gibson, P. R. & Young, G. P. Butyrate production from dietary fibre and protection against large bowel cancer in a rat model. Gut 34, 386–391 (1993).
Heidor, R. et al. The chemopreventive activity of butyrate-containing structured lipids in experimental rat hepatocarcinogenesis. Mol Nutr Food Res (2015).
Castagna, M. et al. Direct activation of calcium-activated, phospholipid-dependent protein kinase by tumor-promoting phorbol esters. J Biol Chem 257, 7847–7851 (1982).
George, J. & Shukla, Y. Emptying of Intracellular Calcium Pool and Oxidative Stress Imbalance Are Associated with the Glyphosate-Induced Proliferation in Human Skin Keratinocytes HaCaT Cells. ISRN Dermatol 2013, 825180 (2013).
Zhang, Y. J. et al. mTOR signaling pathway is a target for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 16, 2617–2628 (2009).
Lu, Q. et al. Expression and clinical significance of mammalian target of rapamycin/P70 ribosomal protein S6 kinase signaling pathway in human colorectal carcinoma tissue. Oncol Lett 10, 277–282 (2015).
Lee, S. Y., Jeong, E. K., Jeon, H. M., Kim, C. H. & Kang, H. S. Implication of necrosis-linked p53 aggregation in acquired apoptotic resistance to 5-FU in MCF-7 multicellular tumour spheroids. Oncol Rep 24, 73–79 (2010).
Holden, P. & Horton, W. A. Crude subcellular fractionation of cultured mammalian cell lines. BMC Res Notes 2, 243 (2009).
Seshasai, S. R. et al. Diabetes mellitus, fasting glucose, and risk of cause-specific death. N Engl J Med 364, 829–841 (2011).
Sakai, A. & Fujiki, H. Promotion of BALB/3T3 cell transformation by the okadaic acid class of tumor promoters, okadaic acid and dinophysistoxin-1. Jpn J Cancer Res 82, 518–523 (1991).
Kuroki, T. & Sasaki, K. Relationship between in-vitro cell transformation and in-vivo carcinogenesis based on available data on the effects of chemicals. IARC Sci Publ 67, 93–118 (1985).
Sasaki, K. et al. Recommended protocol for the BALB/c 3T3 cell transformation assay. Mutat Res 744, 30–35 (2012).
Tsuchiya, T. & Umeda, M. Improvement in the efficiency of the in vitro transformation assay method using BALB/3T3 A31-1-1 cells. Carcinogenesis 16, 1887–1894 (1995).
Bradford, M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72, 248–254 (1976).
Acknowledgements
We thank Annett Müller for excellent technical assistance during the whole project. Furthermore we are grateful to Dr. Poth (Harlan Cytotest Cell Research GmbH, Roßdorf) for providing the BALB/c-3T3 A31-1-1 subclone. This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (TH 1392/2-1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.P. and R.T. conceived and designed the experiments as well as analysed and interpreted the data. D.P. conducted all experiments and wrote the manuscript. R.T. revised the manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Poburski, D., Thierbach, R. Improvement of the BALB/c-3T3 cell transformation assay: a tool for investigating cancer mechanisms and therapies. Sci Rep 6, 32966 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32966
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32966
This article is cited by
-
Metformin alters therapeutic effects in the BALB/c tumor therapy model
BMC Cancer (2021)
-
Cooperative treatment effectiveness of ATR and HSP90 inhibition in Ewing’s sarcoma cells
Cell & Bioscience (2021)
-
Roles of Cyclin A, Myc, Jun and Ppm1l in tumourigenic transformation of NIH3T3 cell
Journal of Genetics (2018)
-
Lead facilitates foci formation in a Balb/c-3T3 two-step cell transformation model: role of Ape1 function
Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2018)
-
Insulin-IGF signaling affects cell transformation in the BALB/c 3T3 cell model
Scientific Reports (2016)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.