Abstract
In this report we show for the first time that neutron anomalous dispersion can be used in a practical manner to determine experimental phases of a protein crystal structure, providing a new tool for structural biologists. The approach is demonstrated through the use of a state-of-the-art monochromatic neutron diffractometer at the Institut Laue-Langevin (ILL) in combination with crystals of perdeuterated protein that minimise the level of hydrogen incoherent scattering and enhance the visibility of the anomalous signal. The protein used was rubredoxin in which cadmium replaced the iron at the iron-sulphur site. While this study was carried out using a steady-state neutron beam source, the results will be of major interest for capabilities at existing and emerging spallation neutron sources where time-of-flight instruments provide inherent energy discrimination. In particular this capability may be expected to offer unique opportunities to a rapidly developing structural biology community where there is increasing interest in the identification of protonation states, protein/water interactions and protein-ligand interactions – all of which are of central importance to a wide range of fundamental and applied areas in the biosciences.
Introduction
The direct visualisation of protonation states and water networks surrounding biological macromolecules has been a longstanding challenge in structural biology1. Neutron protein crystallography is a developing technique that is able to yield this information in a way that relates directly to biological structure and function2,3,4. At the ILL, major developments continue for neutron protein crystallography – these are mostly focused on the LADI Laue instrument that covers larger protein systems5,6. Smaller systems can be studied at high resolution using the monochromatic D19 diffractometer7,8. Further investments are also being made at current and future neutron sources and high priority is being placed on their exploitation for structural biology. Examples include the High-Flux Reactor (HIFR)9 and Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory10 and at the J-PARC neutron source in Japan11. The European Spallation Source (ESS) is currently being built in Sweden and will feature the NMX protein diffractometer as one of its first instruments.
The insights provided are crucial for an understanding of enzymatic catalysis, redox reactions and protein engineering relevant to areas such as bio-fuel cells, biosensors and biochips and drug design. Here we show that it is possible to use neutron anomalous scattering to phase protein crystal structures in a practical fashion. This study derives from early pioneering work in which Schoenborn and colleagues measured anomalous differences in myoglobin-Cd crystals12, as originally suggested by Ramaseshan13,14. This was later extended to a two-wavelength approach by Bartunik15. Since then, neutron facilities have evolved, becoming more brilliant and using increasingly efficient detector systems; this, with the ready availability of perdeuteration technologies for the preparation of optimised protein samples16,17, opens the door to practicable phasing of protein crystal structures using neutron anomalous diffraction. Beyond reactor neutron sources, this capability is likely to be also of interest to researchers that are operating and developing instrumentation at spallation neutron sources, which provide high performance time-of-flight technologies and therefore offer precise energy discrimination. This permits an optimised approach for neutron anomalous scattering. However, the application of this technique has not yet been seriously developed as an approach that could become readily available to the structural biology community.
Results
In the current study, perdeuterated Pyrococcus furiosus rubredoxin18 was produced with the iron atom from the [Fe-4S] cluster replaced by the 113Cd isotope. Neutron diffraction data were collected from a perdeuterated crystal (Fig. 1a) using ILL’s high flux thermal diffractometer D19. This instrument has fixed wavelength options of 0.95 Å, 1.17 Å, 1.46 Å and 2.42 Å. The wavelength dependence of the imaginary part of the neutron anomalous dispersion is relatively smooth and is still significant over the hot and thermal neutron range of 0.3 to 3 Å wavelength. For this study a neutron wavelength of 1.17 Å was selected on the basis of a compromise between the proximity to the Cd absorption resonance at 0.68 Å19 and the difficulty of resolving Bragg reflections at short wavelength. Diffraction data were collected at room temperature up to 1.75 Å resolution and were corrected for neutron attenuation arising almost solely from the single 113Cd atom in the unit cell. The quality of the neutron data is shown by the low value of the precision indicating (multiplicity weighted) Rp.i.m. value of 14.9% for the highest resolution shell and 4.2% overall (see Table 1).
(a) The 4.5 mm3 113Cd substituted crystal as obtained in the sitting drop container. Scale bar is 100 μm. (b) Harker section at z = 0.5 from the neutron Patterson map computed by PATTERSON/CCP4i32. Contours levels are shown from 2 to 10 sigma. (c) Plot of the anomalous signal to noise ratio (<d”/sig>) obtained from SHELXC (red line) and correlation coefficient as a function of resolution (blue line, from CCP4).
The data were analysed for the presence of an anomalous signal using SCALA20 and SHELXC21, which both showed a high anomalous signal-to-noise ratio across most of the resolution range (Fig. 1b). Harker sections calculated from the anomalous Patterson map show a strong 9.0-sigma peak corresponding to the 113Cd atom (Fig. 1c). Furthermore, the ratio of Ranom values overall and across most of the resolution range to Rp.i.m. values are greater than 1, indicating an anomalous signal (though care has to be taken in interpretation as Ranom does not take into account redundancy)22,23. The X-ray data can be used as a basis for comparison, as it also contains an anomalous signal. The equivalent Harker section calculated using the X-ray data with the same resolution range as the neutron data (data to 1.75 Å) has a corresponding peak of 7.9-sigma. The comparison against the X-ray data is interesting as both data sets were collected at wavelengths remote from the anomalous edges concerned (1.17 Å experiment wavelength against 0.68 Å for neutrons and 0.98 Å against 3–3.5 Å for the X-ray LI-LII-LIII anomalous edges). To try to compare the experimental results against the theoretical anomalous signal, the expected anomalous signal as a contribution to |F| was estimated using ΔF/F ≈ √2. (√Na.Δb”)/(√Np.bav), where Na is the number of anomalously scattering atoms, Np is the number of protein atoms, bav is the average neutron scattering length for a protein atom and b” is the imaginary contribution to the scattering length at the wavelength of interest (as adapted from Hendrickson and Teeter24). The estimation is 6.7% irrespective of the scattering angle (neutron scattering amplitudes do not fall off appreciably with increasing scattering angle, since the atomic nuclei are effectively point scatterers, if the effects of atomic displacement parameters are not considered). This compares against the measured Ranom (which compares reflection pairs for their experimentally measured intensity differences) of 7.5% overall. Care needs to be taken as the estimation is based upon |F| whilst the measurement is based upon I. The equivalent figures for the X-ray data are 1.5% at 10 Å resolution and 2.8% at 1.75 Å resolution and an Ranom of 2.8%.
SHELXC/D/E21 were used to determine the coordinates of the 113Cd atom and to phase a neutron Fourier map. This experimental density map is of high quality and shows clear features corresponding to the protein structure (Fig. 2a). Using the phased diffraction data, SHELXE automatically built an initial model of 38 polyalanine residues out of a total of 54. Cycles of manual construction and refinement gave a final model consisting of all 54 residues and 49 D2O molecules with R/Rfree of 23.3/28.6% (see Table 1). The overall correlation coefficient between the original SHELXE experimentally phased map and the final refined model calculated phased map is 60.3% including all data to 2.30 Å resolution.
The neutron scattering density maps near the hydrophophobic core of Pf rubredoxin (Trp36, Tyr10, Phe48) rendered with PYMOL43 are shown.
(a) The experimental phased map from SHELXE (2.30 Å resolution, contoured at 0.8 sigma in orange). (b) The 2Fo-Fc map from the refined final model (1.75 Å resolution, contoured at 1.5 sigma in blue).
Discussion
The use of neutron anomalous diffraction differences was first suggested in the 1960s for crystals containing atoms such as 113Cd, 149Sm, 151Eu and 157Gd10. At the time, an anomalous neutron data collection experiment required very large crystals and fewer than 100 reflections could be measured per day; hence experiments were very expensive in neutron beam time and far from tenable as a realistic phasing method for proteins. The present demonstration takes advantage of the neutron anomalous scattering properties of 113Cd, the availability of modern high-intensity monochromatic neutron beamlines such as D19 at the ILL and protein perdeuteration to determine the structure of a biological macromolecule using de novo phasing in a reasonable timescale. As pointed out by Bacon19, isotopic replacement of hydrogen by deuterium atoms in a crystal provides a crucial advantage in all but eliminating hydrogen incoherent scattering and thus enhancing the visibility of the anomalous signal. Advanced facilities that have developed for macromolecular deuteration now permit the production of suitably labelled protein crystals on a routine and reliable basis16. It should be noted that this method may provide a useful complement to X-ray anomalous phasing approaches – particularly where structure determination at room or physiological temperature is advantageous25. In the current study the anomalous scatterer was introduced in the metal chelating site using chemical reagents to remove the native iron prior to isomorphous replacement with the 113Cd isotope. In future studies one can envisage the soaking of anomalous scatterers into macromolecular crystals in a way that is routinely used in X-ray diffraction studies (see for example26 and references therein). Anomalous protein phasing work using X-rays can be delicate when carried out at room temperature and neutron approaches, for which radiation damage effects are essentially negligible, provide a way of tackling these problems. Experiments close to physiological temperatures can highlight structural differences induced by cryo-cooling and which may be more representative of in vivo structures and their resulting functionalities. This is reflected in the recent upsurge of interest in room temperature structures stimulated by FEL studies, including the work of Lui et al. who determined a GPCR crystal structure at room temperature27. This structure showed distinct thermal motions and residue conformations different to the cryo-cooled structure.
The confluence of new spallation neutron sources, high-performance detectors and ready access to perdeutered proteins is paving the way to practical perspectives for neutron phasing methods. The impact of this approach is likely to be greatly enhanced by the fact that time-of-flight measurement at spallation neutron sources will, in a single experiment, provide diffraction data over the whole wavelength range accessible to a given instrument. Plots of the real (b’) and imaginary (b”) components of the neutron scattering length for selected isotopes are provided in Fig. 3, highlighting the availability of an anomalous signal across neutron wavelength ranges. This offers key advantages given that anomalous differences will de facto be available over a wide wavelength range encompassing the resonance energies of isotopes that are relevant for the study of biological crystals.
Calculated values of b’ and b” for E = 178 meV neutron resonance of 113Cd, 151Eu, 149Sm and 157Gd derived from Breit-Wigner formula with the scattering length (Er is the resonance energy, Γ is the total width of the resonance Γn is the width of resonance for re-emission of the neutron with its original energy, k = 2π/λ is the wavenumber and R the nuclear radius).
Resonance parameters Er, Γn, Γ were taken from44.
For convenience, standard criteria were used during phasing of the rubredoxin data. We furthermore opted not to carry out solvent flattening approaches so as to minimise assumptions about the structure/solvent in evaluating the phasing power of the system. SHELX was therefore directed to perform zero cycles of solvent flattening and the two resulting neutron scattering density maps (corresponding to the original and inverted hands of the cadmium substructure) were distinguished on the basis of visual inspection, which showed the inverted hand to be the correct one for phasing. This shows that the data and de novo phasing were of high quality. In future work on the methodology, it would be desirable to adapt current crystallographic software to better accommodate neutron experiments. This would allow the approach to be fully integrated with standard data analysis packages and be more accessible to the wider scientific community. Furthermore, the increased availability of specialised support laboratories for the production of deuterated protein material and optimised crystal growth would benefit the community at large and further enhance the exploitation of neutron spallation sources in this area.
Methods
113Cd-substituted perdeuterated Pyrococcus furiosus (Pf) rubredoxin (Ru) preparation
The pET28a plasmid encoding a synthetic gene for Pf Ru was obtained from GeneArt (Life Technologies, USA). The perdeuterated iron substituted oxidised form of the protein was produced as described elsewhere18,28 and validated by mass spectrometry. The apoprotein was obtained using a previously reported procedure29, adapted for Pf Ru. All buffer constituents except trichloroacetic acid and beta-mercaptoethanol (BME) were filtered through a Chelex resin to remove iron contamination. The Fe-containing protein was denatured on ice with 15% trichloroacetic acid (TCA), 0.5 M beta-mercaptoethanol (BME), with gentle tube inversion for 5 min. The precipitate was recovered by centrifugation at 10000 rpm for 3 min in a table top centrifuge. The white protein precipitate was redissolved for 20 min in 0.5 M Tris base + 60 mM BME. This procedure was repeated twice. To introduce cadmium, an equivalent volume of 25 mM Tris pH7.5 was added to the concentrated protein liquor prior to the addition of 2 molar equivalents of 113CdCl2 (min. 95% isotope enriched, BuyIsotope, Sweden). The clear protein solution was exchanged using centrifugal concentration devices against D2O/Tris 25 mM pD7.5, KCl 150 mM until reaching 99.75% D2O theoretical content at ~80 mg/ml of final protein concentration. During this concentration process, excess soluble 113Cd was eliminated.
Crystallogenesis
Crystal growth followed a multi-step process as described below:
-
1
The 113Cd rubredoxin solution (~80 mg/ml, see above) was equilibrated for 48 hours in a sitting drop container against 1:1 volume of 3.8 M NaH2PO4 : 3.8 M K2HPO4 in >99.7% D2O28.
-
2
Microseeds of Fe-substituted Pf D-rubredoxin, obtained according to a method described by Jenney & Adams28 and by Cuypers et al.18, were added to a pre-equilibrated 113Cd rubredoxin solution. Small hybrid crystals of 113Cd and Fe Pf D-rubredoxin were obtained. These contained the red coloured microseed at the centre and clear 113Cd-substituted protein component at the exterior.
-
3
The 113Cd part of one small hybrid crystal (above) was crushed and used to seed growth of purely 113Cd substituted crystals by repeating steps 1 and 2 to produce crystals with dimensions in the range of 0.1–0.5 mm.
-
4
A sitting drop of protein (~120 μl) was pre-equilibrated at room temperature against a well solution of 2 ml of 3.7 M equimolar NaH2PO4 : K2HPO4 in a purpose-designed sitting drop container. Numerous small protein crystals (from stage three) were added to the pre-equilibrated sitting drop and 20–40 μl of pure D2O was progressively added until the crystals were completely dissolved. The drop tray was then closed hermetically and allowed to equilibrate for 48 h against the 3.7 M salt solution.
-
5
A 50 μm large defect-free bipyramidal crystal from the third stage was washed in fresh 3.7 M phosphate buffer in D2O and transferred with a nylon loop into the 120 μl pre-equilibrated protein-phosphate buffer container (from stage four). A large crystal of volume 4.5 mm3 (Fig. 1a) used for the diffraction study was acquired within 6 days and encapsulated in a 3 mm diameter quartz capillary, sealed with epoxy resin and mounted on a goniometer head for the neutron diffraction experiment.
X-ray data collection, processing and model refinement
Verification of the 113Cd-substituted protein structure was carried out by X-ray crystal diffraction and X-ray fluorescence prior to the large crystal growth. X-ray data collection was performed at 295 K on ESRF (Grenoble, France) beamline ID23-130 using a very heavily attenuated X-ray beam with a quartz capillary encapsulated crystal. The crystallographic data are summarised in Table 1. Data integration was carried out using XDS31. The resulting intensities were merged and scaled with SCALA32. Molecular replacement was performed using MOLREP/CCP433 using an X-ray structure of the oxidised form of Fe-Pf D-rubredoxin at 295 K (pdb code 4AR5) as the probe. Refinement was performed using data to 1.02 Å resolution with automatic water placement using PHENIX.REFINE34 in conjunction with COOT35. All atoms, including water oxygens but with the exception of deuterium atoms, were refined with anisotropic atomic displacements. The final model is accessible under PDB code 5AI3.
Neutron data collection, processing and model refinement
Using instrument D19 at the ILL (Grenoble, France), a complete and highly redundant neutron dataset was recorded using omega step-scans of 0.07° with an exposure time of 50 seconds per image at a neutron wavelength of 1.17 Å for the majority of the images. The merged data contains a 99.9% complete set of reflections with high redundancy to 1.75 Å resolution. The dataset was processed with the ILL program RETREAT36 and corrected for effective neutron attenuation using PLATON37 with a μ value of 1.54 cm−1 at 1.17 Å wavelength (μ = (∑ (coherent absorption cross section) + ∑ (incoherent absorption cross section)) * n atoms/cell volume). The neutron cross section of 113Cd used was 19800 (+/−400) barn for 1.17 Å wavelength38. The reflection data from RETREAT was converted into mtz format with POINTLESS39 using unit cell parameters refined from the X-ray data (a = 34.44 Å; b = 35.14 Å; c = 43.78 Å, α = β = γ = 90°; P212121). Anomalous pairs were handled separately whilst merging data using SCALA up to a resolution of 1.75 Å. The program MTZ2SCA40 was used to convert the neutron anomalous data mtz file into sca file format for the purpose of compatibility with HKL2MAP41 and SHELXC/D/E21. Data corresponding to a resolution of better than 2.3 Å resolution were excluded from SHELXD for single anomalous dispersion (SAD) calculations. For convenience, SHELXD was directed to search for a single atom of Cd using 10,000 trials and found one position. Density modification was not performed in SHELXE and the resolution was extrapolated to 1.5 Å. The neutron scattering maps calculated using the non-solvent modified experimental phases of the original and inverted hands of the Cd substructure used for the SHELXE run showed clear differences with protein structure features readily identifiable in the map corresponding to the phasing using the inverted hand substructure. This phase set was therefore used thereafter. At the end of the SHELXE run, the correlation coefficient of the best partial structure trace against neutron data was 18.7% with a total of 38 alanine residues built. The output file containing the experimental phases from SHELXE was converted into an mtz file format using F2MTZ (script from T. Grüne). A free Rflag set of reflections of 5% was generated with IMPORT/CCP4. This reflection file was used in ARP/wARP42. Neutron data collection took 13 days, with subsequent integration, neutron attenuation correction and phasing achieved using routine crystallography software in ~2 days. The ARP/wARP model was enhanced with cycles of manual building with COOT together with neutron data refinement with a modified scattering table version of PHENIX.REFINE for the 113Cd isotope (neutron coherent scattering length density of 113Cd is −8.0 fm) with automatic water placement. Model refinement statistics are included in Table 1. The structure has been deposited under PDB accession code 5AI2.
Additional Information
Accession codes: The diffraction data and refined models have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank with accession codes 5AI2 (neutron), 5AI3 (X-ray).
How to cite this article: Cuypers, M. G. et al. Macromolecular structure phasing by neutron anomalous diffraction. Sci. Rep. 6, 31487; doi: 10.1038/srep31487 (2016).
References
Blakeley, M. P. Neutron macromolecular crystallography. Crystallogr. Rev. 15, 157–218 (2009).
Casadei, C. M. et al. Heme enzymes. Neutron cryo-crystallography captures the protonation state of ferryl heme in a peroxidase. Science 345, 193–197 (2014).
Kovalevsky, A. Y. et al. The elusive hydronium ion is found in an enzyme exchanging role with a proton at lower pH. Angew. Chem. 50, 7520–7523 (2011).
Haupt, M. et al. Binding site asymmetry in human transthyretin: insights from a joint neutron and X-ray crystallographic analysis using perdeuterated protein. IUCrJ Biol. & Med. 1, 429–438 (2014).
Blakeley, M. P. et al. Neutron macromolecular crystallography with LADI-III. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 1198–1205 (2010).
Blakeley, M. P., Hasnain, S. S. & Antonyuk, S. V. Sub-atomic resolution crystallography: promise, challenges and potential. IUCrJ 2, 464–474 (2015).
Kovalevsky, A. Y. et al. Metal ion roles and the movement of hydrogen during reaction catalyzed by D-xylose isomerase: a joint X-ray and neutron diffraction study. Structure 18, 688–99 (2010).
Kovalevsky, A. Y. et al. Identification of the Elusive Hydronium Ion Exchanging Roles with a Proton in an Enzyme at Lower pH Values. Angew. Chemie 50, 7520–7523 (2011).
Meilleur, F. et al. The IMAGINE instrument: first neutron protein structure and new capabilities for neutron macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallographica Section D 69, 2157–2160 (2013).
Coates, L. et al. The Macromolecular Neutron Diffractometer MaNDi at the Spallation Neutron Source. J. Appl. Cryst. 48, 1302–1306 (2015).
Tanaka, I. et al. Overview of a new biological neutron diffractometer (iBIX) in J-PARC. Nuc. Instr. Meth. Phys. A 600, 161–163 (2009).
Schoenborn, B. P. Neutron diffraction analysis of myoglobin. Nature 224, 143–146 (1969).
Ramaseshan, S. The use of anomalous scattering of neutrons in the solution of crystal structures containing large molecules. Current Science 35, 87 (1966).
Singh, A. K. & Ramaseshan, S. The Use of Neutron Anomalous Scattering in Crystal Structure Analysis. I. Non-Centrosymmetric Structures. Acta Crystallogr. B 24, 35–39 (1968).
Bartunik, H. D. Unique Phase Determination on the Basis of Bijvoet Ratios by Means of Resonant Neutron Scattering. Acta Crystallogr. A 34, 747–750 (1978).
Haertlein, M. et al. Biomolecular Deuteration for Neutron Structural Biology and Dynamics. Methods in Enzymology 566, Chapter 5, 113–157 (2016).
Blakeley, M. P., Langan, P., Niimura, N. & Podjarny, A. Neutron crystallography: opportunities, challenges and limitations. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 18, 593–600 (2008).
Cuypers, M. G. et al. Near-Atomic Resolution Neutron Crystallography on Perdeuterated Pyrococcus furiosus Rubredoxin: Implication of Hydronium Ions and Protonation State Equilibria in Redox Changes. Angew Chem 52, 1022–1025 (2013).
Bacon, G. E. Neutron Diffraction Studies of Organic Molecules. Pure Appl. Chem. 18, 517–532 (1969).
Evans, P. Scaling and assessment of data quality. Acta Crystallgr. D 62, 72–82 (2006).
Sheldrick, G. M. Experimental phasing with SHELXC/D/E: combining chain tracing with density modification. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 479–485 (2010).
Weiss, M. S. Global indicators of X-ray data quality. J. Appl. Cryst. 34, 130–135 (2001).
Mueller-Dieckmann, C., Panjikar, S. Tucker, P. A. & Weiss, M. S. On the routine use of soft X-rays in macromolecular crystallography. Part III. The optimal data collection wavelength. Acta Crystallogr. D 61, 1263–1272 (2005).
Hendrickson, W. A. & Teeter, M. M. Structure of the hydrophobic protein crambin determined directly from the anomalous scattering of sulphur. Nature 290, 107–113 (1981).
Bowler, M. et al. Automation and Experience of Controlled Crystal Dehydration: Results from the European Synchrotron HC1 Collaboration. Crystal Growth & Design 15, 1043–1054 (2015).
Taylor, G. L. Introduction to phasing. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 325–338 (2010).
Liu, W. et al. Serial femtosecond crystallography of G protein-coupled receptors. Science 342, 1521–1524 (2013).
Jenney, F. E. Jr. & Adams, M. W. Rubredoxin from Pyrococcus furiosus. Methods in Enzymology 334, 45–55 (2001).
Maher, M., Cross, M., Wilce, M. C., Guss, J. M. & Wedd, A. G. Metal-substituted derivatives of the rubredoxin from Clostridium pasteurianum. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 298–303 (2004).
Nurizzo, D. et al. The ID23-1 structural biology beamline at the ESRF. Journal of Synchrotron Radiation 13, 227–238 (2006).
Kabsch, W. XDS. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 125–132 (2010).
The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crysallogr. D 50, 760–763 (1994).
Vagin, A. & Teplyakov, A. Molecular replacement with MOLREP. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 22–25 (2010).
Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallgr. D 66, 213–221 (2010).
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta crystallogr. D 66, 486–501 (2010).
Wilkinson, C., Khamis, H. W., Stansfield, R. F. D. & Mcintyre, G. J. Integration of Single-Crystal Reflections Using Area Multidetectors. J. Appl. Cryst. 21, 471–478 (1988).
Spek, A. L. Structure validation in chemical crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 65, 148–155 (2009).
McLane, V., Dunford, C. L., Rose, P. F. & Mughabghab, S. F. Neutron cross section curves Edn. 4th. (Academic Press: Boston,, 1988).
Evans, P. Scaling and Assessment of Data Quality. Acta Crystallogr. D 62, 72–82 (2006).
Grune, T. mtz2sca and mtz2hkl: facilitated transition from CCP4 to the SHELX program suite. J. App. Cryst. 41, 217–218 (2008).
Pape, T. & Schneider, T. R. HKL2MAP: a graphical user interface for phasing with SHELX programs. J. Appl. Cryst. 37, 843–844 (2004).
Cohen, S. X. et al. Towards complete validated models in the next generation of ARP/wARP. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2222–2229 (2004).
Schrodinger, L. L. C. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.7. (2014).
Mughabghab, S. F. Neutron Cross Sections Vol. 1, Part B (Academic Press, New York, 1984).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the ILL and ESRF for access to the beamlines D19 and ID23-1. Sample preparation and data analysis was supported by the ILL and EPSRC (UK). We thank M. Bowler (EMBL Grenoble) for useful discussion. We also thank J. Archer and J. Allibon for invaluable assistance during data collection. The D19 diffractometer was originally refurbished with funding from the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) under grant GR/R47950/01. The Deuteration Laboratory in ILL’s Life Science group was funded under EPSRC grants GR/R99393/01and EP/C015452.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
E.P.M. and V.T.F. designed the research. M.H. designed the expression system and advised on sample preparation. M.G.C. produced the D-protein sample, the crystals, collected X-ray synchrotron data, analysed the neutron and X-ray data, built and refined the models. M.G.C., E.M., V.T.F. and S.A.M. collected the neutron diffraction raw data. E.M. performed the neutron attenuation correction. M.G.C., E.P.M., E.M., V.T.F. and S.A.M. participated in writing the manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Cuypers, M., Mason, S., Mossou, E. et al. Macromolecular structure phasing by neutron anomalous diffraction. Sci Rep 6, 31487 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31487
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31487
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.