This Article contains typographical errors.
In the Methods section under subheading ‘Measurement error evaluation’,
“Measurement errors were 1.33° degree for OA, 0.93° for OA; 1.12° for OA-CA; 0.44 mm for orbital width; 0.35 mm for orbital height; 0.015 for the orbital width/height ratio.”
should read:
“Measurement errors were 1.33° degree for CA, 0.93° for OA; 1.12° for OA-CA; 0.44 mm for orbital width; 0.35 mm for orbital height; 0.015 for the orbital width/height ratio.”
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1038/srep11528
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Denion, E., Hitier, M., Guyader, V. et al. Correction: Corrigendum: Unique human orbital morphology compared with that of apes. Sci Rep 6, 29861 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29861
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29861
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
