## Abstract

At first glance, the trailing tentacles of a jellyfish appear to be randomly arranged. However, close examination of medusae has revealed that the arrangement and developmental order of the tentacles obey a mathematical rule. Here, we show that medusa jellyfish adopt the best strategy to achieve the most uniform distribution of a variable number of tentacles. The observed order of tentacles is a real-world example of an optimal hashing algorithm known as Fibonacci hashing in computer science.

### Similar content being viewed by others

## Introduction

A century ago, after investigating several hundred specimens of 0.6–30 mm in diameter, Kinoshita remarked that the tentacles and other organs of the jellyfish *Gonionemus vertens* are arranged in a regular order^{1,2}. Without exception, these organs in each quadrant are arranged clockwise in the order 1, 6, 3, 8, 5, 2, 7, 4, 9, 1, as numbered in the sequence of development and viewed from below the umbrella. Komai and Yamazi have confirmed Kinoshita’s observation for approximately 60 specimens of *G. vertens* of 5–21 mm in diameter and with no more than 20 tentacles in each quadrant^{3}. The authors have found that the size of these tentacles is nearly always in the order 1, 14, 6, 19, 11, 3, 16, 8, 13, 5, 18, 10, 2, 15, 7, 20, 12, 4, 17, 9, 1 and that exceptions to this pattern, if any, are found only among 11 to 20. This tendency has also been found in other hydrozoan jellyfishes including *Olindias formosus* (Fig. 1a), in which not only the number of the organs but also the number of radial canals are highly variable (Fig. 1b,c)^{1,2,3,4}. Most importantly, the order conforms exactly to the arrangement commonly found in phyllotaxis^{5}, i.e., the arrangement in which the organs are placed with constant intervals of angle equal to 137.5° (Fig. 1d)^{3,4}.

Jellyfish have *N*-fold rotational symmetry^{1}, i.e., a specimen looks the same after rotation by an angle of 360°/*N*. The following results do not depend on *N* and we use a tetramerous sample (*N* = 4) for purposes of illustration. The number of organs in each part of *N* units is denoted as *T*. We make the biological assumption that the jellyfish is genetically programmed to generate organs successively at constant intervals of angle. In each unit, this angle is denoted as α/*N* (Fig. 1d). Thus, the angle is defined as the angle between successive organs (α/*N*) multiplied by the number (*N*) of equivalent units. We assume that this angle (α) has been optimised during the course of evolution. The use of α in place of the actual angle α/*N* is only for the sake of presentation.

Each unit subtends an angle of 360°/*N*, which is divided into *T* intervals by *T* organs. As indicated in the bottom of Fig. 1d, in an ordinal sequence, the angle of the *i*-th interval is denoted as θ_{i} (*i* = 1, 2, …, *T*). The mean and variance of θ_{i} are given by 360°/*N*/*T* and

In this equation, the variance σ^{2} of the interval angles is defined such that it is independent of *N*. To signify that σ^{2} is determined by the angle α and *T*, it is denoted as σ^{2}(α, *T*). The smaller the value of σ^{2}(α, *T*), the more evenly the distribution of organs. As the number of organs (*T*) is not constant but increases as the medusa grows, we regard an average over *T* of σ^{2}(α, *T*) as the inverse of a fitness function,

or regard *F*^{−1} as unfitness to be minimised. Weighted summation can be used without affecting the main point (Supplementary Figs S1 and S2).

Figure 2a shows the fitness function *F*(α) for *T* = 5, 10 and 15. The observed angle of α = 137.5° lies close to the peak of the fitness landscape. The averaging operation in equation (2) plays a role in setting the peak at α = 137.5°. If the number of organs (*T*) is not variable, the variance σ^{2} has the minimum value zero when α is a multiple of 360°/*T*. Indeed, Fig. 2b shows that σ^{2} for *T* = 5 vanishes at α = 360° × 1/5 = 72° and 360° × 2/5 = 144°. Remarkably enough, the observed order (1, 14, 6, 19, etc.) and the reported irregularity indicate that α is adjusted as accurately as 137.5 ± 2° (Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. S3). This fine-tuning is consistent with the enlarged plot for *T* = 20 in Fig. 2c. Thus, medusa jellyfish are very finely adapted to make use of the optimal arrangement of organs.

Interestingly, the above result corresponds with a mathematical theorem used for a class of search methods commonly known as hashing techniques in computer programming. In terms of our language, the theorem reads as follows (p. 518 of ref. 6):

## Theorem S.

*When the organs are placed at* 0, , , , *in the angle range of* [*0, 360°*], *the T gaps formed by the T organs have at most three different sizes, where* *denotes the remainder after the division of θ by 360°* (*e.g.*, )*. Moreover, the next organ* *will arise in one of the largest gaps*.

Figure 3 illustrates this theorem for α/*N* = 137.5°/4 (Fig. 3a) and α/*N* = 160°/4 (Fig. 3b). The gaps of a given angle are created and destroyed in a first-in, first-out manner, i.e., a new organ arises in the oldest of the largest gaps. This rule holds true for any value of α. The uniqueness of 137.5° (and its mirror-image equivalent 222.5°) is in that this angle leads to the “most uniformly distributed” gaps^{6} in the sense that this ideal angle divides every gap in the ratio of the golden mean 1:1.618. All the other angles will cause a *bad break*^{6} with a division ratio greater than 1:2. In fact, the observed order of organs is simply a real-world example of a hashing algorithm known as *Fibonacci hashing*, in which collisions of organs are avoided most effectively (Fig. 37 of ref. 6).

Quotation marks are used for the “most uniformly distributed” gaps to allow for an important, exceptional case in which α happens to be a rational number, i.e., a ratio of integers. In this case, the smallest gaps can be zero angles because organs overlap (or collide) when the tentacle number is larger than the denominator of the rational number α (collision occurs if *T* > 5 in the case of α = 360° × 2/5 = 144°). For a fixed number of organs, even distribution with a rational number of α is trivially the most uniform distribution (Fig. 2b). Accordingly, the most uniform distribution does not necessarily indicate a 137.5° angle. A variable number of organs is essential for explaining the prevalence of 137.5°. Medusa jellyfish adopt the best strategy to always achieve the most uniform distribution of a variable number of organs that arise one after another.

The purpose of the present article was to provide an evolution-theoretical explanation for the little-known findings of the presence of 137.5° in the order of jellyfish tentacles. The explanation is based on the following plausible assumptions at different biological levels: (i) at the level of organogenesis, an indeterminate number of organs successively arise at constant intervals of angle and (ii) at the level of organisms, natural selection favours a well-balanced arrangement. As in the discipline of theoretical morphology^{7}, the present approach is theoretical in that, to find an optimal arrangement, theoretical possibilities are hypothetically compared with each other. The generality of this approach is both its strength and its weakness. Its weakness is that optimality is not empirically testable without preparing a control group with non-optimal arrangement. Its strength is that it is independent of practical details. The first point (i) is a developmental constraint, whereas there are proximate and ultimate factors for (ii). As an ultimate factor, a uniform distribution is most likely to confer a survival advantage for foraging and locomotion of jellyfish for the very reasons directly related to the functional significance of dispersed appendages. From the viewpoint of fluid mechanics, uniform arrangement of tentacles should contribute to the planktonic mode of life of jellyfish as it enhances viscous forces experienced by the body. Thus, to the extent that a plural number of tentacles are functional to the animal, they are utilized most effectively when they are dispersed away from each other. The selective pressure due to this collective factor is operative insofar as their total effect is more than a simple sum of parts, or to the extent that the arrangement of organs matters. Concerning (i) and a proximate factor for (ii), it is instructive to compare with leaf arrangement in plant^{5}. The overall processes of growth and formation of lateral organs in a hydra and a plant are strictly comparable^{8}. In plant phyllotaxis, the empirical rule that new leaves always arise in the largest gap between those already present is known as Hofmeister’s rule^{9}. This rule is interpreted as a result of a physical or chemical influence of neighbouring organs^{5,8,10,11}. The mutual influence to avoid collision of organs serves as a proximate factor for (ii). In plants, the ultimate cause of collision avoidance should be sought in leaf exposure to light^{12} or in the vascular structure of leaves^{13}. Optimisation in terms of the fitness in equation (2) has much in common with the concept of geometric mean fitness, which is used as a measure of a long-term survival probability under stochastic environments^{14}. It is important that either one of the constraints (i) and (ii), if confirmed, does not lead to 137.5°. The peculiarity of this trait is that it is not optimal for a particular individual at a particular time. The 137.5° angle is the optimal compromise, or “the golden mean”, between the conflicting constraints^{13}. In this general sense, the evolution of the 137.5° angle in plants and jellyfish is a hitherto unnoticed example of parallel evolution, although the habitat environment and the constraint factors are specifically different in the taxa of different lineages.

## Additional Information

**How to cite this article**: Okabe, T. and Yoshimura, J. Optimal hash arrangement of tentacles in jellyfish. *Sci. Rep*. **6**, 27347; doi: 10.1038/srep27347 (2016).

## References

Kinoshita, K. On the arrangement and development of tenta and statocysts in two craspedote medusae. Dobutugaku Zassi 28, 425–451 (1916). (In Japanese).

Uchida, T. Studies on Japanese Hydromedusae. 3. Olindiadae. Annotationes Zoologicae Japonenses 12, 351–371 (1929).

Komai, T. & Yamazi, I. Order found in the arrangement of organs and zooids in some medusa. Annotationes Zoologicae Japonenses 23, 1–7 (1945).

Komai, T. Phyllotaxis-like arrangement of organs and zooids in some medusae. American naturalist 85, 75–76 (1951).

Jean, R. V. Phyllotaxis: A Systemic Study in Plant Morphogenesis (Cambridge University Press, 1994).

Knuth, D. E. The Art of Computer Programming, Volume 3: Sorting and Searching 2nd edn (Addison Wesley, 1998).

McGhee, G. Theoretical Morphology: The Concept and Its Applications (Columbia University Press, 1999).

Berrill, N. J. Growth, Development and Pattern, Ch.16, 420–423 (San Francisco, W. H. Freeman Co., 1961).

Hofmeister, W. Allgemeine Morphologie des Gewächse In Handbuch der Physiologischen Botanik. Vol. 1 (Leipzig, Engelmann, 1968).

Snow, M. & Snow, R. Experiments on phyllotaxis. I. the effects of isolating a primordium. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B 221, 1–43 (1931).

Wardlaw, C. W. Phyllotaxis and organogenesis in ferns. Nature 164, 167–9 (1949).

Niklas, K. J. The role of phyllotatic pattern as a “developmental constraint” on the interception of light by leaf surfaces. Evolution 42, 1–16 (1988).

Okabe, T. Biophysical optimality of the golden angle in phyllotaxis. Scientific Reports 5, 15358 (2015).

Yoshimura, J. & Clark, W. C. Individual adaptations in stochastic environments. Evol. Ecol. 5, 173–192 (1991).

## Acknowledgements

We thank Port of Nagoya public aquarium for the use of photograph. This work was partly supported by Grants-in-Aid from the Japan Society for Promotion of Science (nos 26257405 and 15H04420 to JY).

## Author information

### Authors and Affiliations

### Contributions

T.O. conceived and performed the study. T.O. and J.Y. wrote the manuscript.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

## Electronic supplementary material

## Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

## About this article

### Cite this article

Okabe, T., Yoshimura, J. Optimal hash arrangement of tentacles in jellyfish.
*Sci Rep* **6**, 27347 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27347

Received:

Accepted:

Published:

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27347

## Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.