Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Crystal structure of Anoxybacillus α-amylase provides insights into maltose binding of a new glycosyl hydrolase subclass


A new subfamily of glycosyl hydrolase family GH13 was recently proposed for α-amylases from Anoxybacillus species (ASKA and ADTA), Geobacillus thermoleovorans (GTA, Pizzo and GtamyII), Bacillus aquimaris (BaqA) and 95 other putative protein homologues. To understand this new GH13 subfamily, we report crystal structures of truncated ASKA (TASKA). ASKA is a thermostable enzyme capable of producing high levels of maltose. Unlike GTA, biochemical analysis showed that Ca2+ ion supplementation enhances the catalytic activities of ASKA and TASKA. The crystal structures reveal the presence of four Ca2+ ion binding sites, with three of these binding sites are highly conserved among Anoxybacillus α-amylases. This work provides structural insights into this new GH13 subfamily both in the apo form and in complex with maltose. Furthermore, structural comparison of TASKA and GTA provides an overview of the conformational changes accompanying maltose binding at each subsite.


α-Amylases (EC cleave α-1,4-glycosidic bonds of carbohydrates and oligosaccharides; Hence, these amylolytic enzymes are employed for industrial starch liquefaction and saccharification1. In living organisms, α-amylases are important in starch metabolism (KEGG map ec00500) for digesting carbohydrates to simpler sugars. α-Amylases belong to the glycoside hydrolase (GH) family, which contains nearly 28,000 protein sequences with various specificities2,3. Approximately 83% of these sequences belong to the 40 curator-based subfamilies (as of Nov 2015) in the GH13 family3,4,5 and 11 subfamilies exhibit α-amylase specificity: GH13_1 (fungi), GH13_5 (bacterial liquefying enzymes), GH13_6 (plants), GH13_7 (archaea), GH13_15 (insects), GH13_24 (animals), GH13_27, GH13_28 (bacterial saccharifying enzymes), GH13_32, GH13_36 (intermediary) and GH13_37 (marine bacteria)2. GH13 family enzymes have three structural domains: (i) domain A, which forms an N-terminal (β/α)8 fold (TIM barrel) that functions as the catalytic domain; (ii) domain B, which is essential for substrate binding; and (iii) domain C, which forms a β-sandwich designated as a putative saccharide binding site6.

Recently, a new α-amylase GH13 subfamily was proposed to encompass enzymes found in thermophilic Anoxybacillus and Geobacillus species and in a halophilic Bacillus species7. The earliest two representatives of this subfamily, ASKA and ADTA from Anoxybacillus sp. SK3-4 and DT3-1, respectively, produce high levels of maltose upon reacting with starch8. In our earlier study9, we suggested that ASKA and amylopullulanase anchor to the cells of Anoxybacillus sp. SK3-4, which is an important adaptation to the native hot spring environment of Anoxybacillus sp. SK3-410. Both enzymes work synergistically to hydrolyse starch to glucose, maltose and maltodextrins9. Phylogenetic analysis suggests that ASKA and ADTA cluster with the Bacillus aquimaris α-amylase BaqA11 and the G. thermoleovorans α-amylases Pizzo12, GTA13 and GtamyII14, which exhibit similar conserved sequence regions (CSRs)7. Further phylogenetic analysis of 95 homologous sequences to ASKA indeed indicated that ASKA belongs to a novel GH13 subfamily. Members of this subfamily are characterized by a pair of tryptophan residues between CSR-V and CSR-II, the five-residue LPDIx signature in CSR-V and a long C-terminal region containing five conserved aromatic residues3.

The crystal structure of GTA (PDB ID: 4E2O) provided the first insight into the overall structure, Ca2+ binding sites and substrate binding subsites of this new GH13 subfamily of α-amylases13. Since, GTA is the only structure available in this new subclass of GH, elucidation of homologous structures is expected to increase understanding of the unique GH13 subfamily. Here, we present the first α-amylase structure from Anoxybacillus in the unaffiliated GH13 subfamily.


Structures of TASKA-Apo and TASKA-ligand complexes

To improve the efficiency of recombinant protein purification, we truncated 23 and 27 residues from the N- and C-termini of ASKA, respectively. Consequently, the residue numbering in this report is according to the position in TASKA unless otherwise specified. Crystal structures of the apo form (TASKA-Apo; PDB ID: 5A2A), the maltose-bound complex (TASKA-M; PDB ID: 5A2B) and the maltotriose-bound complex (TASKA-T; PDB ID: 5A2C) were determined to 1.85–1.95 Å resolution. All the crystals belonged to space group P212121, with one monomer in the asymmetric unit. The overall structure resembles previously solved structures of GH13 α-amylases13,15 and consists of three domains16: catalytic domain A containing the active site within its TIM barrel fold (residues 26–139, 187–393), domain B (residues 140–186) and domain C with an all-β fold (residues 394–475) (Fig. 1). The 3D structural alignment using the DALI database17 reveals that the overall structure of TASKA-Apo is similar to those of GTA, Aspergillus niger α-amylase or TAKA-amylase, G. stearothermophilus maltogenic α-amylase Novamyl, G. stearothermophilus neopullulanase, B. circulans cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase (CGTase) and other GHs (Table S1).

Figure 1

Overall structure of truncated α-amylase GH13 subfamily of Anoxybacillus species (TASKA).

Domains A, B and C are shown in green, orange and blue, respectively. The calcium ions are shown in magenta.

Despite its high overall structural similarity to the first three domains of Novamyl (PDB ID: 1QHO), we did not identify maltose bound to the surface of TASKA domain C, which contains a saccharide binding site in the Bacillus amyloliquefaciens α-amylase, Novamyl and B. circulans CGTase structures previously reported18,19,20. Notably, TASKA did not have an amino acid sequence similar to these counterparts. Members of the GH13 subfamily, including Pizzo, GtamyII and BaqA, can degrade raw starch; however, the putative binding sites suspected in domain C have yet to be identified14.

Ca2+ ion binding to TASKA

Previous biochemical studies showed that Ca2+ ion supplementation in enzymatic reactions did not enhance the catalytic activity of GTA but improved those of ASKA and TASKA. Additional Ca2+ binding sites may contribute to the stimulatory effect of Ca2+ observed in ASKA and TASKA but not in GTA7,8,13. Although GTA contains only two Ca2+ binding sites13 and shows high sequence identity to TASKA, we identified four Ca2+ ions (Ca1–4 in subsequent sections) in the TASKA-Apo, TASKA-M and TASKA-T structures (Fig. 1). The four Ca2+ ions in the TASKA structures were assigned according to the electron density level and coordination stereochemistry of Ca2+ binding. It is known that Ca2+ typically forms octahedral coordination geometry with a coordination number (CN) of 5–8 to complete the coordination sphere and bonding distance of ~2.4 Å. The peptide residues that commonly coordinate Ca2+ are Asp, Asn and Glu21.

Ca1 is coordinated by the conserved residues N139 and D182, the main-chain oxygen atoms of H217 and E173 and three water molecules (Fig. 2a). Ca2 is coordinated by the conserved residues N44, N49, D50 and D65; the main-chain oxygen atoms of N46 and G63; and a water molecule (Fig. 2b). Ca3 is coordinated by the side chains of E109 and E110, the main-chain oxygen atom of N92 and three water molecules in TASKA-Apo and TASKA-T, whereas this Ca2+ ion is coordinated by residues E109 and N92 and five water molecules in TASKA-M (Fig. 2c). Despite lacking Ca2+-interacting residues (Asp, Asn and Glu), a Ca4 binding site with CN 6–7 and ion-oxygen bonding distances of ~2.5 Å was also assigned in TASKA structures. Notably, although both Cl and Ca2+ ions are present in the crystallization buffer and have the same electron numbers, we ruled out Cl as the bound ligand since the site does not obey the stereochemical criteria of Cl binding22. Ca4 was coordinated by the main-chain oxygen atom of E400 and five water molecules (TASKA-Apo) or six water molecules (TASKA-M and TASKA-T), with one forming hydrogen bond interactions with conserved residues E283 and E400 (Fig. 2d).

Figure 2

Calcium ion binding sites in Anoxybacillus α-amylase family GH13.

Ca2+ ions are shown in magenta and water molecules that directly interact with Ca2+ ions are shown in red. The Fo-Fc omit maps for the Ca2+ ions are contoured at 8.0σ. The interactions between Ca2+ ions, water molecules and amino acid residues are shown with black lines. (a) Ca1 bridges domains A and B of TASKA by interacting with three water molecules and four conserved residues. (b) Ca2 interacts with universally conserved residues N49, D50, G63 and D65 and Anoxybacillus conserved residues N44 and N46. (c) Ca3 interacts with the side chains of Anoxybacillus conserved residues E109 and E110 and the main chain of N92. (d) Ca4 interacts with conserved residue E400 and five water molecules. A Ca4-binding water molecule interacts with Anoxybacillus conserved residues E283 and E400 (blue lines). The hydrogen bond networks between TASKA and symmetry-related molecules in the crystal are shown in yellow. (e) The side chain of conserved residue E110 shows a conformational change in TASKA-M (grey) compared to TASKA-Apo and TASKA-T (green). Two water molecules (W1 and W2) exclusively found in TASKA-M interact directly with Ca3. W1 and W2 bridge Ca3 and residues E52 and E110, respectively. Interestingly, the backbone of E52 is flipped to adopt the bridge with Ca3. The cause of these conformational changes is unknown.

Comparison of the Ca2+ ion binding sites of all three TASKA structures reveals that the side-chain of residue E110, which interacts with Ca3, underwent a conformational change in the TASKA-M structure relative to TASKA-Apo and TASKA-T. Two water molecules exclusively found in TASKA-M interact directly with Ca3 and bridge it with E52 and E110. Notably, E52 is not involved directly or indirectly in Ca3 binding in TASKA-Apo and TASKA-T, whereas a conformational change flips the main-chain peptide of Y51 to allow the side chain of E52 to interact with Ca3 in TASKA-M. The cause of this conformational change remains unclear (Fig. 2e).

As four Ca2+ ion binding sites are rarely reported, we used comparative sequence analysis to determine whether these Ca2+-interacting residues are conserved in other α-amylases from Anoxybacillus spp., Geobacillus spp. and Bacillus spp. Sequence alignment suggests that all the residues that interact with the four Ca2+ ions are well conserved in most α-amylases from Anoxybacillus spp. except A. tepidamans, suggesting that Anoxybacillus α-amylases may generally have four Ca2+ ion binding sites. The α-amylase of A. tepidamans contains conserved Ca2+ binding residues only for Ca1, Ca2 and Ca4. (Fig. S1). Phylogenetic analyses of 16S rRNA and α-amylase genes further support A. tepidamans, which was initially reported as Geobacillus tepidamans, as an outlier of Anoxybacillus spp. (Fig. S2a,b)23. The 16S rRNA sequence of A. tepidamans is phylogenetically positioned at the base of the Anoxybacillus cluster and represents the closest taxon between the Anoxybacillus species and the16S rRNA of the Geobacillus spp. cluster. Therefore, A. tepidamans is likely a more divergent representative of the GH13 subgroup of the Anoxybacillus cluster (Fig. S2a,b).

To further confirm the endogenous calcium content of TASKA, we performed isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). Titration of TASKA with 1 mM EDTA identified only two Ca2+ ion binding sites in TASKA (Fig. S3), presumably representing the Ca2+ ions at the conserved Ca1 and Ca2 binding sites. However, there were technical constraints on ITC analysis when the Ca2+ ion concentration was increased to 5 mM or higher, hence limiting analysis under conditions mimicking those of crystallization.

Structural comparison of TASKA-Apo and TASKA-ligand

Structural superposition of TASKA-Apo with TASKA-M and TASKA-T using protein backbone Cα atoms shows low RMSD values of 0.32 and 0.20 Å, respectively, indicating that the overall structure of TASKA does not undergo significant conformational changes upon maltose binding. In the absence of a substrate or product, the structure of TASKA-Apo reveals that the active site of the enzyme is occupied by water and solvent molecules, whereas the structures of TASKA-M and TASKA-T show maltose bound to substrate-interacting subsites −1 and −2 of the substrate binding site (Fig. 3a) with each subsite able to interact with one glucose subunit of maltose24. These interactions are similar to the binding in GTA13. The structure of TASKA-T contains electron density representing a maltose molecule at the same subsites as in TASKA-M, suggesting that maltotriose was likely hydrolysed during crystallization. The hydrolytic activity for maltotriose was confirmed in a separate study using an Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography-Evaporating Light Scattering Detector (UPLC-ELSD), wherein glucose and maltose were produced following the hydrolysis of maltotriose (Fig. S4). Therefore, TASKA-T represents a similar enzyme-product complex structure to TASKA-M.

Figure 3

Structural analysis of maltose binding at subsites −1 and −2 of TASKA.

(a) Maltose binding at the active sites of Anoxybacillus α-amylase family GH13. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dotted lines. The 2Fo-Fc maps for maltose are contoured at 1.0σ. (b) Superposition of TASKA-Apo (cyan), TASKA-M (orange) and TASKA-T (yellow) structures shows the conformational changes in the substrate binding sites. The binding site of TASKA-Apo contains solvent molecules, whereas those of TASKA-M and TASKA-T contain maltose at subsites −1 and −2 and show substantial differences, especially at O1′. Coordination of a water molecule (W1) deviates 1.2 Å in TASKA-T and another water molecule (W2) hydrogen bonded with the O1 and O5 atoms of maltose in TASKA-M was absent in TASKA-T. (c) Superposition of TASKA-T (yellow) and α-amylase complexes including GTA-acarbose (PDB ID: 4E2O) (brown), Bacillus stearothermophilus maltogenic α-amylase Novamyl (PDB ID: 1QHO) (light blue) and pig pancreatic α-amylase (PDB ID: 1PPI) (pale cyan) shows that the disaccharide coordination of subsites −1 and −2 is highly conserved.

In the TASKA-M and TASKA-T complex structures (Fig. 3b), the O1′, O2′ and O3′ atoms of maltose were positioned identically to three of the water molecules in the TASKA-Apo structure and the O5′, O6′ and O3 of maltose were coordinated similarly to the oxygen atoms of the acetate ions. The water and acetate molecules interact with the conserved maltose-binding residues R211, D310, D213 and R362. In both the TASKA-M and TASKA-T structures, the maltose coordinates the βC-βD, βE-η3, βF-η6, βI-α11 and η8-α13 loops near the entry site of the TIM barrel and forms hydrogen bonds with the side chains of the Asp-Glu-Asp catalytic triad residues (D213, E242 and D310) and W101, Y143, R211, H309 and R362 (Fig. 3a). The subsite −1 ring forms a π-π interaction with the side chain of conserved Y100, which is common to the GH13 family25. Structural comparisons revealed that maltose binding at subsites −1 and −2 of the TASKA active site is highly similar to that in GTA (PDB ID: 4E2O), G. stearothermophilus maltogenic α-amylase (PDB ID: 1QHO)18, B. circulans CGTase (PDB ID: 1EO5)26 and many other homologues in the DALI database (Fig. 4).

Figure 4

Superposition of the TASKA-maltose and GTA-acarbose structures shows the conserved maltose binding site at subsites −1 and −2.

W244 and loop η4-α5 are proposed to undergo conformational changes upon substrate binding. The conserved Asp-Glu-Asp catalytic triad (D213, E242 and D310) is shown as sticks. TASKA is shown in green and GTA is shown in salmon. Maltose from TASKA-maltose is shown in yellow.

To provide a dynamic view of the conformational changes upon maltose binding to each subsite, we performed molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in the presence and absence of maltose. Trajectory analysis of the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) plot (Fig. S5a) showed that TASKA-Apo and TASKA-T reached equilibrium states after 8 ns and 9 ns of simulation, respectively. The root-mean-square fluctuations (RMSF) plot of TASKA-T relative to TASKA-Apo suggested the presence of flexible regions (Fig. S5b) that η2-α2 and η8-α13 loops in close proximity to maltose binding residues (Fig. S5c). The residues that interact with subsites −1 and −2 were highly stable, with main chain Cα atoms undergoing conformational changes with RMSD of ~1–2 Å. The βG-α8 loop that moved ~6 Å and the η4-α5 loop (RMSD 2.6 Å) that may participate in subsite +2 coordination have been proposed to be important in accommodating subsite +2, as described in the discussion section. The η2-α2 loop was highly flexible (RMSD of ~6 Å); however, the physiological function of this loop remains to be investigated (Fig. S5c).


The α-amylases from Anoxybacillus species (ASKA and ADTA), G. thermoleovorans (GTA, Pizzo and GtamyII) and B. aquimaris (BaqA) have been proposed as a novel subfamily of the α-amylase family7, which was recently supported by detailed phylogenetic analysis3. The GH13 subfamily uniquely exhibits (i) high maltose production; (ii) the ability to degrade raw starch; (iii) a long C-terminal sequence containing five conserved aromatic residues; (iv) dual tryptophan residues between CSR-V and CSR-II; and (v) a unique stretch of amino acids (LPDIx) in CSR-V3,7.

Recently, a structure of GTA complexed with an acarbose-derived pseudo-hexasaccharide was determined, providing the first structural insights into this new subfamily of GH13 α-amylases13. Previous biochemical analysis showed that addition of Ca2+ ions does not change the catalytic activity of GTA but enhances the activities of ASKA and TASKA7,8,13. Despite the 69% sequence similarity between the primary sequences of TASKA and GTA, the TASKA structure contains four well-ordered Ca2+ ion binding sites, whereas GTA has only two Ca2+ ion sites (with only one well-ordered in the structure). All the TASKA Ca2+ ions are located far from the catalytic site, suggesting that they may not be directly involved in catalysis and analyses suggest that Ca1, Ca2 and Ca3 are likely to be important for structural stability. Ca1 and Ca2 occupy the two calcium-binding sites conserved among the members of GH13. Ca1 bridges domains A and B and this interface is important for α-amylase and CGTase thermostability27,28,29,30. Ca1-interacting residues are sensitive to amino acid substitution and mutagenesis studies are often deleterious28,31,32. Ca2 and Ca3 are positioned in domain A and may help stabilize the catalytic domain. Amino acid substitutions at residues adjacent to Ca2-interacting residues can increase the optimum temperature and exhibit calcium-independent behaviour33. Both Ca1 and Ca2 are coordinated similarly to those in GTA and coordination of Ca1, Ca2 and Ca3 was previously found in the five domains of G. stearothermophilus α-amylase (PDB ID: 1QHO)18. Sequence alignment suggests that residue N46, which interacts with Ca2 and residues E109 and E110, which interact with Ca3, are conserved in almost all Anoxybacillus α-amylases except A. tepidamans (Fig. S1). In addition to the five previously defined unique features of this newly established GH13 subfamily, our current results suggest that Ca1, Ca2 and Ca3 binding sites and their interacting residues are a unique feature of Anoxybacillus α-amylases but are less conserved in GTA, Pizzo, GtamyII and BaqA α-amylases from the Geobacillus and Bacillus genera.

Superposition of TASKA and GTA reveals that the Ca3 binding residue E110 is substituted with a proline residue (P114) in GTA. Furthermore, the substitution of P98 in GTA with K94 in TASKA weakens the hydrogen bond between the main chains of adjacent residues E93–W101 (3.15 Å) in TASKA relative to M97–W105 (2.75 Å) in GTA, hence decreasing TASKA’s structural stability. We hypothesize that the substitution of two GTA proline residues (P98 and P114) with K94 and E110, respectively, in TASKA may increase the flexibility of the loop region around Ca3, which may have been recruited for structure stabilization (Fig. 2c). Structural comparisons also reveal that the carboxylic group of E110, which directly interacts with Ca3 in TASKA-Apo and TASKA-T, adopts different side-chain rotamers and interacts with a Ca3-binding water molecule in the TASKA-M structure. In addition, another Ca3-binding water molecule found exclusively in TASKA-M forms a hydrogen bond with E52 that is accommodated by flipping the main chain of Y51 (Fig. 2e). We are unable to conclusively determine the underlying causes of the conformational changes observed in the TASKA-M crystal structure. The changes may have been triggered by changing the rotamer conformation of R322 in the crystal symmetry-related molecule, which is hydrogen bonded to the side chain of E50 in the TASKA-T structure. However, both TASKA-M and TASKA-T adopted highly similar crystal packing. TASKA-M was obtained through co-crystallization of TASKA and maltose, while TASKA-T represents TASKA in a post-maltotriose hydrolysis stage. It is also possible that the specific stages of TASKA-maltose complex formation would affect Ca3 coordination.

Ca4 was identified in TASKA-Apo, TASKA-T and TASKA-M. Ca4 occupies a novel calcium-binding site on the surface of domain C and directly interacts with the oxygen atom of E400 and five (TASKA-Apo) or six water molecules (TASKA-T and TASKA-M), one of which is hydrogen bonded with the conversed E283 and E400 residues. Another two water molecules indirectly build a water network linking Ca4 to a symmetry-related TASKA molecule in the crystal; thus, given the lack of Ca2+-binding features21, the Ca4 site likely results from crystal packing (Fig. 2d). Nonetheless, it is worth noting that the homologous Novamyl and CGTase structures show interactions between maltose and the main-chain oxygen atom of I415, which is equivalent to TASKA E40018,19 (Fig. S6). However, the physiological relevance of Ca4 to Anoxybacillus α-amylases has yet to be confirmed.

The results of ITC experiments indicate that there are 1.6 calcium binding sites found in TASKA at the condition of 1 mM CaCl2, which we interpret as the conserved Ca1 and Ca2 binding sites in α-amylases. We note that 1 mM CaCl2 reaches saturation in TASKA. For comparison, the intracellular Ca2+ ion concentration in E. coli is ~100 nM34. While the ITC results for TASKA in 5 mM CaCl2 indicating the presence of 3.5 binding sites, the plot fitting curves were rather poor and likely not reliable. We are unable to validate the reliability of 3.5 Ca binding sites as proposed by ITC. This suggests that the experiment setup with Ca ion (5 mM) has reached the highly saturated condition that is not favorable to TASKA in the current ITC setup. Therefore, we were not able to conduct further ITC experiment that mimic crystallization environment, i.e. 0.1–0.2 M calcium acetate. Nonetheless, the ITC results do suggest that binding of Ca3 and Ca4 to respective pockets might be weaker than that of Ca1 and Ca2 and undetectable under the current experimental setup. We cannot eliminate the possibility that Ca3 and Ca4 binding in TASKA is induced by the high Ca2+ ion concentration in the crystallization setup. Thus, the Ca2+ binding pocket, particularly the one in domain C could be a general metal binding site.

To complement the understanding of enzyme conformations before and after substrate binding, we solved TASKA structures in the apo form and complexed with maltose or maltotriose. The structure of TASKA co-crystallized with maltotriose showed a well-ordered maltose in the substrate-binding site, suggesting that TASKA can hydrolyse maltotriose to maltose and glucose during the crystallization process. We hypothesize that TASKA-M mimics the enzyme-product complex, while TASKA-T is a snapshot structure of the enzyme after maltotriose hydrolysis (post-substrate-hydrolysis stage). Accordingly, TASKA-M and TASKA-T have slightly different maltose binding interactions.

Substrate binding at TASKA subsites −1 and −2 is highly similar to that of many α-amylases including Novamyl and pig pancreatic α-amylase (PDB ID: 1PPI)35, suggesting that the coordination of subsites −1 and −2 is well conserved (Fig. 3c). Superposition of the TASKA-Apo, TASKA-M and TASKA-T structures revealed a conserved and identical substrate-binding site before and after maltose binding (Fig. 3b). Interestingly, despite the overall conservation of substrate binding at subsites −1 and −2 evidenced by identical coordination of the Asp-Glu-Asp catalytic triad residues (D213, E242 and D310) in all three TASKA structures (Fig. 3b), a slightly different configuration was found at the reducing ring of maltose in subsite −1 of TASKA-M and TASKA-T. While the electron density of the O1′ atom of maltose in TASKA-T is well ordered, weaker density was observed for TASKA-M. In addition, we also observed that the water molecule (W1) that hydrogen bonds to O1′ is identical for TASKA-Apo and TASKA-M but is shifted by 1.2 Å in TASKA-T (Fig. 3b). Another water molecule, W2, forms hydrogen bonds with O1 and O5 of the non-reducing ring of maltose. A similar water molecule was found in TASKA-Apo but not in TASKA-T (Fig. 3b). We initially expected identical structures for TASKA-M and TASKA-T since the final bound ligand is the same. Therefore, it is not known whether the slight changes in coordination and configuration for the disaccharide rings and water molecules at subsites −1 and −2 seen in these high resolution structures are caused by individual crystal conditions or are true indications of the post-substrate-hydrolysis stage (TASKA-T) or enzyme-product stage (TASKA-M).

In a separate analysis, we modelled the acarbose-derived pseudo-hexasaccharide into TASKA-T using structural superposition with GTA. The model shows that the inhibitor acarbose, which mimics a starch substrate, fits well into the TASKA catalytic site without any steric clashes at subsites −2, −1, or +1. The Asp-Glu-Asp catalytic triad is well positioned to interact with the sugar residues: D310 binds to and distorts the sugar ring at subsite −1, whereas D213 serves as a nucleophile by attacking the C1 atom on the distorted sugar and E242 serves as an acid by donating a proton to the glycosidic bond between subsites −1 and +1 (Fig. 4). H217 is also strictly conserved to bind to subsite +1. On the other hand, subsite +2 in TASKA is not as well defined as in GTA. To bind the sugar residue at subsite +2 of TASKA, the aromatic side chain of the conserved W244 residue must first tilt ~60° to allow π-π stacking interactions with the sugar ring (Fig. 4). Second, the η4-α5 loop (F164–Q169) of domain B needs to move ~1.7 Å towards the subsite +2, presumably to stabilize substrate binding through the bulky side chain of W166 (Fig. 4). Furthermore, while K216, which replaces R220 in GTA, can still bind to the sugar residue at subsite +2, F178, which replaces Y182 in GTA, can no longer form a similar hydrogen bond to the sugar’s O6 atom. To accommodate the acarbose inhibitor, therefore, TASKA must adopt a conformational change upon ligand binding at subsite +2. Alternatively, subsite +2 of TASKA may have actually shifted towards the η4-α5 loop and adopted a different binding mode. In addition, shifting the η4-α5 loop widens the ligand-binding groove and substitution of N171, L176 and R220 in GTA with the smaller A167, V172 and K216 residues, respectively, creates additional space, perhaps allowing for a subsite +3 not observed in GTA, which may also interact with the H245 residue that replaces S249 in GTA. Thus, in combination with the GTA-acarbose structure, the TASKA structures have provided insights into substrate binding at subsites +2 to −2 for this new subclass of glycosyl hydrolases.

A previous study examined the effects of mutagenesis in the CSR of full-length ASKA and characterized the thermostability following mutations at residues F113VASKA, A161DASKA, Y187FASKA and L189IASKA (ASKA numbering), equivalent to F136V, A184D, Y210F and L212I herein4. F136V and A184D exhibited longer half-life thermostability, whereas Y210F and L212I had lower thermostability at 65 °C7. Our new X-ray structures of TASKA suggest explanations for the observed effects of mutagenesis. The TASKA structure shows that F136 and L212 are involved in hydrophobic interactions with residues V138, L194, Y210, V215, F222, W223, F226, L239 and I259, which are important for the structural stability of domain A (Fig. 5a). Mutation of the hydrophobic residues changes the hydrophobic interaction surface and affects the thermostability of the enzyme. The TASKA structure also indicates that the Y210F mutation may remove a hydrogen bond between Y210 and the main-chain oxygen atom of A198 (Fig. 5a), which explains the lower thermostability of the Y210F mutant. Modelling of A184D demonstrates that the carboxylate side chain is hydrogen bonded with the side chains of H158 and E186 (Fig. 5b), thereby disrupting the H158-E186 interaction. The A184D mutant showed higher catalytic activity and thermostability compare to the wild type. As H158 also binds to D182 (Fig. 5b), which in turn binds Ca1, this mutation may affect Ca1 binding. Ca1 contributes to structural stability, as does the A184D mutant (with a longer half-life at 65 °C); therefore, we hypothesize that A184D increases the Ca1 binding affinity by weakening the positive charge on H158 towards the D182 carboxylate, which results in a more stable structure between D182 and Ca1 and higher levels of enzyme activity.

Figure 5

Model of TASKA mutants F136V, A184D, Y210F and L212I.

(a) The F136V and L212I mutants affect hydrophobic interactions in domain A, while Y210F may remove a hydrogen bond (yellow dotted line). (b) The A184D mutant may contribute a hydrogen bond between the carboxylate side chain and the side chains of H158 and E186 to interrupt the H158-E186 interaction.

In conclusion, the structures of TASKA-Apo and TASKA-maltose complexes complement that of the GTA-acarbose complex and provide insights into the conformational changes accompanying maltose binding at subsites −1 and −2 of GH13 α-amylases. Structural comparisons reveal conservation of substrate binding interactions at subsites −2, −1 and +1 but conformational changes at conserved residues W166 and W244 and loop η4-α5 of domain B to accommodate subsites +2, which might alternatively connect to an additional subsite +3 with a different ligand binding mode. The TASKA structure with four Ca2+ ion binding sites is unique among members of the GH13 family; however, the physiological relevance of Ca3 and Ca4 not yet confirmed. Our TASKA structures also suggest explanations for the effects of previously characterized ASKA mutants on enzyme thermostability. The structure-guided sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis indicate a deviated α-amylase subgroup for A. tepidamans. To determine the physiological function of Ca3 and Ca4 of TASKA, examination of the residues involved in these binding sites via site-directed mutagenesis and biochemical analyses is needed. Finally, determination of the structure of an A. tepidamans α-amylase homologue thought to adopt another unique GH13 α-amylase structure would provide insight into the structural evolution of α-amylases.


Construction, expression and purification of TASKA

A truncated α-amylase (EC from Anoxybacillus sp. SK3-4 (TASKA) was constructed by removing 23 residues at the N-terminus (signal peptide, residues 1–23) and 27 residues at the C-terminus (residues 479–505) predicted to be a transmembrane region9 by TMHMM and SOSUI36,37. The TASKA gene was constructed by PCR with Q5 High Fidelity DNA polymerase (NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA) using primers with EcoRI and XhoI restriction sites (TASKA_F, 5′-CCTGAATTCAAAACGGAGC-3′ and TASKA_R, 5′-CCTCTCGAGGTTTAACCC-3′)5. The TASKA gene was cloned into pET-28a to produce the recombinant pET28a-TASKA plasmid with 6×-His-tags at the N- and C-termini. Recombinant TASKA was transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells, which were grown at 310 K with 200 rev/min agitation to OD600 ~ 0.5–0.6 prior to induction with 0.4 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside. The culture was incubated for additional 3 h before the cells were harvested and lysed using B-PER Protein Extraction Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). The cell lysate was dialyzed overnight against the purification binding buffer (0.5 M NaCl, 0.1 M imidazole and 0.02 M sodium phosphate, pH 7.4) followed by protein purification using a 5-mL HisTrap column (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden). The protein was eluted using buffer containing 0.02 M sodium phosphate (pH 7.4), 0.5 M NaCl and 0.5 M imidazole. The enzyme activity and purity of the collected fractions were determined by 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) assay and SDS-PAGE, respectively8.

Crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of TASKA-Apo, TASKA-M and TASKA-T

The pooled purified TASKA protein was buffer exchanged into 50 mM Tris (pH 8.0) using a Vivaspin concentrator fitted with a 5-kDa molecular weight cut-off filter (Sartorius Stedim Biotech, Göttingen, Germany) and concentrated to 10.8 mg/mL. Initial crystallization screening was carried out using the sitting drop vapour diffusion method in 96-well MRC Crystallization PlatesTM (Molecular Dimensions, Newmarket, UK) with crystal screen I and II kits (Hampton Research, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA). The drops containing 0.5 μL TASKA protein and 0.5 μL reservoir solution were equilibrated against 80 μL reservoir solution at 293 K. Crystal hits were identified for the reservoir condition containing 0.2 M calcium acetate, 0.1 M sodium cacodylate (pH 6.5) and 18% (w/v) polyethylene glycol 8,000. The condition was further optimized to obtain good diffraction-quality crystals. TASKA-Apo crystals that diffracted to 1.9 Å resolution were grown against reservoir containing 0.1 M calcium acetate, 0.1 M sodium cacodylate (pH 6.5) and 18% (w/v) polyethylene glycol 8,000. The crystals were flash-cooled with liquid nitrogen after soaking in cryoprotectant solution consisting of 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.2 M calcium acetate, 0.1 M sodium cacodylate (pH 6.5), 19.8% (w/v) polyethylene glycol 8,000 and 16% (v/v) glycerol.

The TASKA-M and TASKA-T complexes were crystallized using the streak seeding method with a commercially available seeding tool (Hampton Research, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA). The seeding tool was dipped into a drop containing TASKA-Apo crystals and streaked on the drops that consisted of 0.3 μL 6 mg/mL TASKA protein and 0.3 μL reservoir solution (0.1 M calcium acetate, 0.1 M sodium cacodylate (pH 6.5) and 18% (w/v) polyethylene glycol 8,000 with 20 mM maltose or maltotriose). TASKA-T crystals were flash-cooled directly from the drop, while TASKA-M crystals were combined with 1 μL cryoprotectant solution (0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.2 M calcium acetate, 0.1 M sodium cacodylate (pH 6.5), 19.8% (w/v) polyethylene glycol 8,000 and 16% (v/v) glycerol) before flash cooling.

X-ray (wavelength 1.5418 Å) diffraction data were collected under a nitrogen gas stream at 100 K using an R-AXIS IV++ area detector on a Rigaku MicroMax-007 HF X-ray generator. All data sets were processed in space group P212121 with the XDS program package38. The TASKA-M structure was solved by molecular replacement with PHASER39 in CCP4 software suite40 using GTA (PDB ID: 4E2O) as a model, autobuilt with ArpWarp41 and refined and manually built using Refmac42 and Coot43. The TASKA-Apo and TASKA-T structures were then solved using TASKA-M as a model. The backbone dihedral angles of 99.8–100% of the residues of all three structures fall into the most favoured or allowed regions of the Ramachandran plot, as defined by PROCHECK44. Data collection and refinement statistics are listed in Table 1. Subsite numbering was in accordance with the nomenclature for enzymatic subsites of carbohydrate-processing enzymes proposed by Davies, et al.45.

Table 1 Data collection and refinement statistics for TASKA-Apo, TASKA-M and TASKA-T.

Endogeneous calcium determination by isothermal titration calorimetry

Purified TASKA was buffer exchanged against 50 mM HEPES-NaOH buffer (pH 8.0) and subsequently concentrated to 16.1 mg/mL using Amicon® Ultra Centrifugal filters with 10,000 Nominal Molecular Weight Limit (Merck, White House Station, NJ, USA). ITC experiments were carried out using a MicroCal PEAQ-ITC (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, United Kingdom) by transferring 0.28 mL concentrated TASKA into the sample cell. The concentrated TASKA was titrated with 1 mM CaCl2 at room temperature and subsequently titrated with 1 mM EDTA. The resulting thermogram was analysed using the manufacturer’s analysis software.

Molecular dynamics simulation of TASKA-T

MD simulations of the TASKA-T structure with and without maltose bound were performed in GROMACS 4.546. The topology and parameters of maltose were prepared in SwissParam47. The MD simulation was performed using a CHARMM27 force field. The systems were solvated with TIP3P water in a dodecahedral box with 10 Å between the protein structure and the box. The system was subsequently neutralised, energy minimised and equilibrated in NVT and NPT ensembles. The temperature was maintained at 293 K. On completing system equilibration, a production run of 10 ns was performed.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Chai, K. P. et al. Crystal structure of Anoxybacillus a-amylase provides insights into maltose binding of a new glycosyl hydrolase subclass. Sci. Rep. 6, 23126; doi: 10.1038/srep23126 (2016).


  1. Bertoldo, C. & Antranikian, G. Starch-hydrolyzing enzymes from thermophilic archaea and bacteria. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 6, 151–160, doi: 10.1016/S1367-5931(02)00311-3 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Janeček, Š., Svensson, B. & MacGregor, E. A. α-Amylase: an enzyme specificity found in various families of glycoside hydrolases. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 71, 1149–1170, doi: 10.1007/s00018-013-1388-z (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Janeček, Š., Kuchtová, A. & Petrovičová, S. A novel GH13 subfamily of α-amylases with a pair of tryptophans in the helix α3 of the catalytic TIM-barrel, the LPDlx signature in the conserved sequence region V and a conserved aromatic motif at the C-terminus. Biologia 70, 1284–1294, doi: 10.1515/biolog-2015-0165 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stam, M. R., Danchin, É. G. J., Rancurel, C., Coutinho, P. M. & Henrissat, B. Dividing the large glycoside hydrolase family 13 into subfamilies: towards improved functional annotations of α-amylase-related proteins. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 19, 555–562, doi: 10.1093/protein/gzl044 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lombard, V., Golaconda Ramulu, H., Drula, E., Coutinho, P. M. & Henrissat, B. The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D490–D495, doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1178 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Horváthová, V., Janeček, Š. & Šturdík, E. Amylolytic enzymes: molecular aspects of their properties. Gen. Physiol. Biophys. 20, 7–32 (2001).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ranjani, V. et al. Protein engineering of selected residues from conserved sequence regions of a novel Anoxybacillus α-amylase. Sci. Rep. 4, doi: 10.1038/srep05850 (2014).

  8. Chai, Y. Y., Rahman, R. N. Z. R. A., Illias, R. M. & Goh, K. M. Cloning and characterization of two new thermostable and alkalitolerant α-amylases from the Anoxybacillus species that produce high levels of maltose. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 39, 731–741, doi: 10.1007/s10295-011-1074-9 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kahar, U. M., Chan, K.-G., Salleh, M., Hii, S. M. & Goh, K. M. A high molecular-mass Anoxybacillus sp. SK3-4 amylopullulanase: characterization and its relationship in carbohydrate utilization. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14, 11302–11318, doi: 10.3390/ijms140611302 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Chan, C. S., Chan, K.-G., Tay, Y.-L., Chua, Y.-H. & Goh, K. M. Diversity of thermophiles in a Malaysian hot spring determined using 16S rRNA and shotgun metagenome sequencing. Front. Microbiol. 6, 177, doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00177 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Puspasari, F. et al. Raw starch-degrading α-amylase from Bacillus aquimaris MKSC 6.2: isolation and expression of the gene, bioinformatics and biochemical characterization of the recombinant enzyme. J. Appl. Microbiol. 114, 108–120, doi: 10.1111/jam.12025 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Finore, I. et al. Purification, biochemical characterization and gene sequencing of a thermostable raw starch digesting α-amylase from Geobacillus thermoleovorans subsp. stromboliensis subsp. nov. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 27, 2425–2433, doi: 10.1007/s11274-011-0715-5 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mok, S.-C., Teh, A.-H., Saito, J. A., Najimudin, N. & Alam, M. Crystal structure of a compact α-amylase from Geobacillus thermoleovorans. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 53, 46–54, doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2013.03.009 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Mehta, D. & Satyanarayana, T. Domain C of thermostable α-amylase of Geobacillus thermoleovorans mediates raw starch adsorption. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98, 4503–4519, doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5459-8 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuriki, T. & Imanaka, T. The concept of the α-amylase family: structural similarity and common catalytic mechanism. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 87, 557–565, doi: 10.1016/S1389-1723(99)80114-5 (1999).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Li, C. et al. Close relationship of a novel Flavobacteriaceae α-amylase with archaeal α-amylases and good potentials for industrial applications. Biotechnol. Biofuels 7, 18, doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-7-18 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Holm, L. & Rosenström, P. Dali server: conservation mapping in 3D. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, W545–W549, doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq366 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Dauter, Z. et al. X-ray structure of Novamyl, the five-domain “maltogenic” α-amylase from Bacillus stearothermophilus: maltose and acarbose complexes at 1.7 Å Resolution. Biochemistry 38, 8385–8392, doi: 10.1021/bi990256l (1999).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lawson, C. L. et al. Nucleotide sequence and X-ray structure of cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase from Bacillus circulans strain 251 in a maltose-dependent crystal Form. J. Mol. Biol. 236, 590–600, doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1168 (1994).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sumitani, J., Tottori, T., Kawaguchi, T. & Arai, M. New type of starch-binding domain: the direct repeat motif in the C-terminal region of Bacillus sp. no. 195 α-amylase contributes to starch binding and raw starch degrading. Biochem. J. 350 Pt 2, 477–484 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Zheng, H., Chruszcz, M., Lasota, P., Lebioda, L. & Minor, W. Data mining of metal ion environments present in protein structures. J. Inorg. Biochem. 102, 1765–1776, doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2008.05.006 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Carugo, O. Buried chloride stereochemistry in the Protein Data Bank. BMC Struct. Biol. 14, 19, doi: 10.1186/s12900-014-0019-8 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Coorevits, A. et al. Taxonomic revision of the genus Geobacillus: emendation of Geobacillus, G. stearothermophilus, G. jurassicus, G. toebii, G. thermodenitrificans and G. thermoglucosidans (nom. corrig., formerly ‘thermoglucosidasius’); transfer of Bacillus thermantarcticus to the genus as G. thermantarcticus comb. nov.; proposal of Caldibacillus debilis gen. nov., comb. nov.; transfer of G. tepidamans to Anoxybacillus as A. tepidamans comb. nov.; and proposal of Anoxybacillus caldiproteolyticus sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 62, 1470–1485, doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.030346-0 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. MacGregor, E. A., Janeček, Š. & Svensson, B. Relationship of sequence and structure to specificity in the α-amylase family of enzymes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1546, 1–20, doi: 10.1016/S0167-4838(00)00302-2 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kumar, V. Analysis of the key active subsites of glycoside hydrolase 13 family members. Carbohydr. Res. 345, 893–898, doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2010.02.007 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Uitdehaag, J. C. M., van Alebeek, G.-J. W. M., van der Veen, B. A., Dijkhuizen, L. & Dijkstra, B. W. Structures of maltohexaose and maltoheptaose bound at the donor sites of cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase give insight into the mechanisms of transglycosylation activity and cyclodextrin size specificity. Biochemistry 39, 7772–7780, doi: 10.1021/bi000340x (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Goh, P. H., Illias, R. M. & Goh, K. M. Rational mutagenesis of cyclodextrin glucanotransferase at the calcium binding regions for enhancement of thermostability. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 13, 5307–5323, doi: 10.3390/ijms13055307 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Declerck, N., Machius, M., Wiegand, G., Huber, R. & Gaillardin, C. Probing structural determinants specifying high thermostability in Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase. J. Mol. Biol. 301, 1041–1057, doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4025 (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Chi, M.-C., Chen, Y.-H., Wu, T.-J., Lo, H.-F. & Lin, L.-L. Engineering of a truncated α-amylase of Bacillus sp. strain TS-23 for the simultaneous improvement of thermal and oxidative stabilities. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 109, 531–538, doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2009.11.012 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Leemhuis, H., Kelly, R. & Dijkhuizen, L. Engineering of cyclodextrin glucanotransferases and the impact for biotechnological applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 85, 823–835, doi: 10.1007/s00253-009-2221-3 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Priyadharshini, R. & Gunasekaran, P. Site-directed mutagenesis of the calcium-binding site of α-amylase of Bacillus licheniformis. Biotechnol. Lett. 29, 1493–1499, doi: 10.1007/s10529-007-9428-0 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen, Y.-H. et al. Mutational analysis of the proposed calcium-binding aspartates of a truncated α-amylase from Bacillus sp. strain TS-23. Ann. Microbiol. 60, 307–315, doi: 10.1007/s13213-010-0042-3 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ghollasi, M., Khajeh, K., Naderi-Manesh, H. & Ghasemi, A. Engineering of a Bacillus α-amylase with improved thermostability and calcium independency. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 162, 444–459, doi: 10.1007/s12010-009-8879-2 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Gangola, P. & Rosen, B. P. Maintenance of intracellular calcium in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 262, 12570–12574 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Qian, M., Haser, R., Buisson, G., Duee, E. & Payan, F. The active center of a mammalian α-amylase. Structure of the complex of a pancreatic α-amylase with a carbohydrate inhibitor refined to 2.2 Å resolution. Biochemistry 33, 6284–6294 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Krogh, A., Larsson, B., von Heijne, G. & Sonnhammer, E. L. L. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J. Mol. Biol. 305, 567–580, doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Hirokawa, T., Boon-Chieng, S. & Mitaku, S. SOSUI: classification and secondary structure prediction system for membrane proteins. Bioinformatics 14, 378–379 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kabsch, W. XDS. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 125–132, doi: 10.1107/S0907444909047337 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674, doi: 10.1107/S0021889807021206 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Winn, M. D. et al. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 235–242, doi: 10.1107/S0907444910045749 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Langer, G. G., Cohen, S. X., Lamzin, V. S. & Perrakis, A. Automated macromolecular model building for X-ray crystallography using ARP/wARP version 7. Nat. Protoc. 3, 1171–1179, doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.91 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Murshudov, G. N. et al. REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 355–367, doi: 10.1107/S0907444911001314 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126–2132, doi: 10.1107/S0907444904019158 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Laskowski, R. A., MacArthur, M. W., Moss, D. S. & Thornton, J. M. PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26, 283–291, doi: 10.1107/S0021889892009944 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Davies, G. J., Wilson, K. S. & Henrissat, B. Nomenclature for sugar-binding subsites in glycosyl hydrolases. Biochem. J. 321 (Pt 2), 557–559 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Pronk, S. et al. GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit. Bioinformatics 29, 845–854, doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt055 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Zoete, V., Cuendet, M. A., Grosdidier, A. & Michielin, O. SwissParam: a fast force field generation tool for small organic molecules. J. Comput. Chem. 32, 2359–2368, doi: 10.1002/jcc.21816 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the University of Malaya via High Impact Research Grants (UM C/625/1/HIR/MOHE/CHAN/01, grant A-000001-50001) and UM-MOHE HIR grant (UM C/625/1/HIR/MOHE/CHAN/14/1, H-50001-A000027) awarded to K.-G.C. This work was also supported by Universiti Teknologi Malaysia GUP grant 06H31 to K.M.G. and Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia research grant DPP-2014-022. We thank Prof. David Rice (University of Sheffield), Prof. Muhammad Mukram Mohamed Mackeen (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia), Dr. Marco Marenchino (Malvern Instruments), Dr. Štefan Janeček (Slovak Academy of Sciences) and Ms. Lee Yie Vern (Universiti Sains Malaysia) for useful discussion.

Author information




A.-H.T., K.L.H., K.-G.C., M.S.S., K.M.G. and C.L.N. conceived and designed the experiments. K.P.C., N.F.O. and C.L.N. performed the experiments. K.P.C., N.F.O., A.-H.T., K.L.H., K.-G.C., M.S.S., K.M.G. and C.L.N. analysed the data. A.-H.T., K.L.H., K.-G.C., M.S.S., K.M.G. and C.L.N. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. A.-H.T., K.L.H., K.-G.C., M.S.S., K.M.G. and C.L.N. wrote the paper. K.P.C., N.F.O. and C.L.N. prepared Figures 1–5. K.P.C., N.F.O. and C.L.N. prepared Table 1. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chai, K., Othman, N., Teh, AH. et al. Crystal structure of Anoxybacillus α-amylase provides insights into maltose binding of a new glycosyl hydrolase subclass. Sci Rep 6, 23126 (2016).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing