Abstract
Quantum correlations between spatially separated parts of a ddimensional bipartite system (d ≥ 2) have no classical analog. Such correlations, also called entanglements, are not only conceptually important, but also have a profound impact on information science. In theory the violation of Bell inequalities based on local realistic theories for ddimensional systems provides evidence of quantum nonlocality. Experimental verification is required to confirm whether a quantum system of extremely large dimension can possess this feature, however it has never been performed for large dimension. Here, we report that Bell inequalities are experimentally violated for bipartite quantum systems of dimensionality d = 16 with the usual ensembles of polarizationentangled photon pairs. We also estimate that our entanglement source violates Bell inequalities for extremely high dimensionality of d > 4000. The designed scenario offers a possible new method to investigate the entanglement of multipartite systems of large dimensionality and their application in quantum information processing.
Introduction
Entanglement is one of the remarkable predictions of quantum mechanics^{1,2,3,4,5}, which was first pointed out by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR)^{6,7}. The predicted correlations cannot be reproduced by any classical theories based on local variables [also called local realistic theories (LRT)]. Bell test experiments^{1,2,8} provide a feasibly approach to verify such correlations in practice. The kernel of these experiments is the Bell inequalities, which are based on the constraint that the correlations exhibited by local variable theories must satisfy. Contradicting Bell inequalities can thus be considered a nonclassical indicator of quantum nonlocality.
One of the most striking works on Bell inequalities for multidimensional systems is the reformulation of the Collins, Gisin, Linden, Massar and Popescu (CGLMP) inequalities^{4}. As presented by CGLMP in their original scenario, we summarize the three key components in a Bell test experiment. The first part is about the ddimensional system. Each one of the two remote parties, say Alice and Bob, has such a system with dimensionality d. Using the BellCGLMP inequality, they investigate the quantum nonlocality between the ddimensional systems they have. Since CGLMP concern the impossibility to reproduce quantum correlations with local variable theories, the definition of the ddimensional system then should be generally fitting their purpose. When a ddimensional system is able to be measured by performing properly designed measurements which can provide d possible distinct outcomes, it then can be used to reveal the quantum nonlocality. The second part is about the measurements performed by Alice and Bob on their respective systems. In a Bell test experiment, suppose that one of the parties, Alice, can carry out two possible measurements, A_{1} or A_{2} and that the other party, Bob, can carry out two possible measurements, B_{1} or B_{2}, where each measurement has d possible outcomes: A_{1}, A_{2}, B_{1}, B_{2} = 0, 1, ..., d − 1. The last part is that, with sufficient measurement results obtained from the Bell test experiment, one can calculate the joint probabilities P(A_{a}, B_{b}) for a, b ∈ {1, 2}. For example, Alice and Bob choose measurements A_{1} and B_{2}, respectively. Each time, they measure their respective systems and then have a set of outcome. After sufficient runs of such measurements have been made, a joint probability distribution for P(A_{1}, B_{2}) can be derived from the experimental outcomes. All the other probabilities P(A_{a}, B_{b}) used to determine the value of Bell’s expression can be measured in the same manner. The correlations among the outcomes of the measurements exhibited by localvariable theories must obey the generalized Bell inequalities
The Bell expression, I_{d}, reads:
where P(A_{a} = B_{b} + k) denotes the probability of the measurements A_{a} and B_{b} with outcomes that differ, modulo d, by k. Compared with previous significant discoveries^{3}, this is the first analytical demonstration of Bell inequalities for bipartite quantum systems of arbitrarily high dimensionality.
In addition to the fundamental interest for revealing fascinating aspects of quantum mechanics, Bell inequalities generalized to ddimensional systems and their verified quantum nonlocality are also crucial for a variety of quantum information tasks and engineering protocols^{9,10}, such as quantum communication^{11,12}, quantum computation^{13}, quantum error correction^{14} and quantum metrology^{15}. Considerable progress has been made to demonstrate the violation of generalized Bell inequalities. In particular, quantum correlations have recently been revealed^{16} by experimentally violating Bell inequalities for bipartite ddimensional quantum systems up to d = 12. In this seminal demonstration of Bell test experiment, genuine multidimensional entanglement^{17} of the orbital angular momentum (OAM)^{18} of photon pairs was generated through spontaneous parametric downconversion (SPDC) and enhanced by the entanglement concentration. The direct extension of the OAMentangled photons to show violations of Bell inequalities for d > 12, however, is restricted by the quality of entanglement due to the intrinsic properties of the SPDC process. The recent trend is toward efficient verifications of highdimensional OAM entanglement, e.g., by using an entanglement measurement^{19} or by developing a novel nonlinear criterion^{20}.
Here, we use a concept different from that of ref. 16. The present concept utilizes multidimensional objects composed of multiple pairs of polarizationentangled photon to consider their nonclassical bipartite multidimensional correlations. From our theoretical method and experimental observations, it was proved for the first time that the nonclassical multidimensional correlations can readily reveal such joint nonclassical effects surely violating the CGLMP inequalities. Our theoretical scheme provides a novel point of view to investigate contradictions of BellCGLMP inequalities. Such method explores the states of bipartite ddimensional entangled systems where the state of each system is in a Hilbert space spanned by multiple twodimensional state vectors. It fully satisfies the needs of the scenario of CGLMP and shows a strict connection between the considered ddimensional entangled states and the settings required for measuring the Bell expression I_{d} in an experiment. Thus, following the scheme, polarizationentangled photon pairs were operated to experimentally observe ddimensional quantum nonlocality up to d = 16 by performing the Bell test experiment. We also objectively extrapolate the ddimensional quantum nonlocality up to d = 4096 from measuring the density matrix of the entangled state. Besides the verification of the Bell inequalities, slight modification of the method has also allowed us to estimate the entanglement dimensionality.
The BellCGLMP inequality is a general tool that helps to detect quantum nonlocality between two spatially separated ddimensional systems. As described by quantum mechanics for a composite system, the ddimensional state vector of a quantum system can be consisted of twodimensional states of N subsystems where d = 2^{N}. In the experiment, we choose entangled photon pairs as such subsystems and consider the dimensionality and quantum nonlocality in the photon polarization degree of freedom (DOF). While the system considered in our experiment is composed of subsystems that are allowed to be created at different times, these subsystems eventually constitute a system with a ddimensional state in the polarization DOF. They can be locally measured to provide possible outcomes for determining the joint probabilities P(A_{a}, B_{b}). Thus the correlation in the polarization DOF between two ensembles of photons can be completely demonstrated by violating the Bell CGLMP inequality. Furthermore, since the scheme of CGLMP concerns the correlation in the DOF where the ddimensional system is defined, the temporal DOF then does not play a role in determining both P(A_{a}, B_{b}) and the Bell expression I_{d} (2) in our experiment.
Results
We present in Fig. 1 the theoretical scheme used in our experiments to investigate the quantum nonlocality that contradicts Bell inequalities for systems of large dimensionality. The first step is to prepare the entanglement of bipartite ddimensional systems. Here, the bipartite system generated for the Bell test experiments is composed of two ensembles of particles. Assuming that each particle is a twostate quantum object with some degree of freedom, the dimension of the Hilbert space of the ensemble consisting of N particles will be d = 2^{N}. If we assume further that all of the N entangled pairs have the same state of the form , then the state vector reads:
where and for j_{m} ∈ {0, 1}. It is a maximally entangled state of two ddimensional systems. In a real experiment, the entangled states that are created are not pure but are mixed states^{10}, say, ρ_{Φ}(d), and, as will be shown presently, the purity of ρ_{Φ}(d) affects the degree of violation of the Bell inequalities.
The second step is to perform the measurements. When considering the Bell test experiment in which Alice and Bob measure the operators A_{a} and B_{b}, according to the original designations^{4}, have the nondegenerate eigenvectors
where (α_{1}, α_{2}) = (0, 1/2) and (β_{1}, β_{2}) = (1/4, −1/4). To take measurements from single twostate quantum particles, we rephrase and in terms of individual states as
where
Here we have used the method as the technique for decomposing the quantum Fourier transform into product representation^{9}. For the experimental state and ρ_{ϕm} denotes the state of the mth entangled pair, the joint probabilities can be represented in terms of the probabilities of individual pairs of entangled states by
which shows that the joint probability P_{QM}(A_{a} = k, B_{b} = l) can be derived from the individual joint probabilities of obtaining the measurement outcomes k_{m} and l_{m} on the state ρ_{ϕm}. Hence, the Bell expression I_{d} can also be determined from the outcomes of measurements of individual entangled pairs. For the case of two ensembles of perfect entangled states , the Bell inequalities can be maximally violated, that is, I_{d}(QM) ≈ 2.970 for extremely large ddimension^{4}.
In the experimental demonstrations of the proposed method, we use entangled photons to construct ensembles A and B. As shown in Fig. 2, the ingredient photon pairs are generated through the typeII SPDC process and entangled at the degree of freedom of polarization^{21,22,23,24} which is based on the proposal Fig. 1. The polarizationentangled pair , where represents the horizontal (vertical) polarization state. To connect with the conceptual scheme, we make a correspondence of denotations by and . In the experiment, the entangled pairs consisting of the ensembles A and B are created at different times. The stability of our laser and measurement system enables entangled pairs created at different times with a large time separation have a very close fidelity without additional system alignment, which makes the experimental states approximately identical at ρ_{ϕm} ≈ ρ_{ϕ} for all pairs m. The tomographic diagram is depicted in Fig. 3(a)^{25,26,27} and the entanglement source exhibits a high quality by the state fidelity .
In addition to the BellCGLMP inequalities, we use the measured state fidelity F_{Φ}(d) to extract information about the dimensionality of the entanglement between ensembles A and B. Here the entangled dimension is defined in terms of Schmidt number, S(d), of the created state ρ_{Φ}(d). For an ideal case, the Schmidt number of a perfectly prepared state is S(d) = d. We use the Schmidt number witness^{28,29,30} to obtain the lower bounds of the dimensionality of the entanglement. If ρ_{Φ} shows that then ρ_{Φ}(d) is a genuine multidimensional entangled state with S(d) ≥ γ_{s} where γ_{s} ∈ {2, 3, ..., d}. For a given state fidelity F_{Φ}(d), one can find a maximum value of γ_{s} which satisfies the above condition, meaning that the maximum lower bound of S(d) can be found as well. Figure 3(b) illustrates the maximum lower bounds, S_{L}(d), observed in our experiment.
To realize measurements in bases [Eq. (5)] and [Eq. (6)], we use a halfwave plate (HWP) set at θ and quarterwave plate (QWP) set at −π/4 to perform unitary transformations of singlephoton polarization states. The angular settings of HWP for the qubits of Alice and Bob are designed as θ_{A} = −π/8 − 2π(k + α_{a})/4d and θ_{B} = −π/8 − 2π(−l + β_{b})/4d, respectively. See Methods for the complete derivation. After rotating the waveplate sets, the states of polarizations are projected onto the base . For a given pair of operators (A_{a}, B_{b}), the total number of measurement settings of wave plates is d − 1. Although arbitrary unitary transformations of singlephoton polarization states can be performed with high precision by sets of wave plates, the imperfect angle settings introduce errors that accumulate with increasing d. Such experimental imperfections become rather crucial when d is large.
In the experimental demonstration of ddimensional nonlocality, we investigate the Bell expressions using two approaches. As quantum mechanics predicts that the Bell expression follows the definition
where and is the operator of Bell expression, we can obtain the values of I_{d}(QM) either by measuring the density operator of ρ_{Φ}(d) to calculate or by performing measurements on the created states, that is, by measuring in the bases of eigenvectors of A_{a} and B_{b} [Eq. (4)] to find all of the probabilities P_{QM}(A_{a} = k, B_{b} = l) for I_{d}(QM).
Our experiment shows the violation of the BellCGLMP inequalities for systems of 16 dimensions. The Bell expressions I_{d}(QM) are calculated by measuring all of the probabilities P_{QM}(A_{a} = k, B_{b} = l). As seen in Fig. 4, the experimental results are strongly consistent with the theoretical predictions based on an ideal entangled state and perfect measurements in Eq. (4). The Bell expressions measured here are strictly dependent on the accurate settings of the wave plates, as the required setting accuracy increases with d proportionally. Although our demonstration shows cases up to d = 16 only, the method can be straightforwardly extended to test Bell inequalities for systems of larger dimensionality.
We also made an estimation from the density matrices. Figure 5 illustrates that the bipartite ddimensional system composed of polarizationentangled pairs possesses highquality entanglement sufficient to violate Bell inequalities for d > 4000. The density matrix of the created state ρ_{Φ}(d) was experimentally measured to determine the values of I_{d}(QM) [Eq. (8)] as the measurement of Bell expression. The degree of quantum violations depends on the purity of ρ_{Φ}(d) which is evaluated by the state fidelity F_{Φ}(d). For the stability of our experimental conditions, the state fidelity F_{Φ}(d) is determined by measuring F_{ϕ} under the approximation which decreases with the increasing number of pairs N.
Discussion
In this experiment, entangled photon pairs are generated to serve as a bipartite ddimensional system to provide stronger nonlocality than usual twolevel cases. The concept is similar to that two entangled pairs can teleport more than onequbit information^{31}. For the feature that the BellCGLMP inequality can be tested by using entangled photon pairs created at different times, it becomes possible that one can use different experimental output states but have the same state vectors to obtain the same quantum violations. Such situations could be possible in practical quantum information tasks and their applications. For example, Alice wants to use two entangled pairs which are shared with Bob and Charlie respectively to teleport a twoqubit entangled system on her hand such that Bob and Charlie jointly share this twoqubit entanglement. In general, these two entangled pairs can be created with different entanglement sources and then used for teleportation at different times due to some technical reasons, for example, the mediate entangled pairs are generated by Bob and Charlie separately. See Fig. 6. This can be considered as an extension of the scenario used in the experiment of Zhang et al.^{31} where the two entangled pairs are created at the same time. While the entangled pairs are created at different times by using different sources, the target twoqubit entangled state is enabled to be teleported in principle. Our scenario can concretely reveal the quantum nonlocality that powers this twoqubit teleportation by violating the BellCGLMP inequality.
Extending this idea, a multipartite multidimensional system will be implemented in the future work by genuine multipartite entanglement of twodimensional systems. With this approach, it would be possible to investigate generic quantum nonlocality by systematically implementing Bell test experiments for the multipartite multidimensional systems^{5}. There have been extensive investigations of multipartite entanglement, both from the fundamental and practical points of view. In particular, a genuine eightphoton polarizationentangled state has recently been experimentally generated using the SPDC process^{32}. Hence, our novel scheme holds high promise for testing generic Bell inequalities for the eightpartite highdimensional systems using a stateoftheart eightphoton entanglement source. In addition to entangled photons, one can directly apply our idea to other quantum systems where the states are able to be coherently manipulated and locally measured. Such kind of Bell test experiments could be realized in systems of multipartite entangled ions in the GreenbergerHorneZeilinger (GHZ) state^{33}. The systems of nanomechanical resonators^{34} and Josephson circuits^{35,36} also provide these suitable conditions to implement our scheme. Furthermore, it is interesting to investigate violations of CGLMPBell inequality with multidimensional entanglement composed of intra and interpair entangled states^{37}. While the devised scenario still requires a rigorous theory showing its general utility in quantum applications such as quantum information processing, it provides a novel way to consider all the related information tasks based on the generic Bell test experiments.
Finally, we remark three points on the present experimental violations of BellCGLMP inequalities. First, while the ensemble of photon pairs is mathematically equivalent to a multidimensional entangled state, each Bell pair is generated and immediately afterwards already detected and then such a multidimensional entangled state is not generated at any point of time. Here, our aim is to demonstrate that the test of BellCGLMP inequalities can be shown by subsystems even though the particles never coexisted. Second, using the independently generated Bell pairs to realize a quantum information protocol, such as quantum teleportation introduced above (Fig. 6), can use quantum memory^{38,39} for state storage so that they can coexist before the subsequent required measurements. This is different from the implementation which utilizes multidimensional states of genuinely single quantum systems^{16}. Compared with the teleportation scheme without memory, Fig. 6, the states can be teleported to Bob and Charlie at the same time with the support of quantum memory, which gives higher flexibility for a subsequent quantum information task. Finally, in addition to the present experimental demonstration using SPDC source, there exists other potential methods to create ensembles of entangled photons to show the general utility of our idea in the Bell test experiments on multidimensional systems. For instance, one can use hyperentangled states to investigate quantum violations of BellCGLMP inequalities. As shown in the experiments on such entanglement^{40,41}, the twophoton fourqubit state entangled both in polarization and spatial modes has been created as , where and represent two orthogonal states with the spatial modes R_{A(B)} and L_{A(B)}. This hyperentangled state is equivalent to a maximally entangled state of two fourdimensional systems [See Eq. (3)] and then suitable for implementing our scheme.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated the violation of the BellCGLMP inequalities for systems of extremely large dimensions. These demonstrations are based on bipartite ddimensional systems composed of polarizationentangled photon pairs. Using the wellknown technique of typeII SPDC for polarization entanglement, which is robust and stable and needs only modest experimental effort using standard technical devices such as waveplate sets and SPCMs, the scheme provides a way to experimentally observe ddimensional quantum nonlocality up to d = 16 by performing measurements of the Bell expressions I_{d}. An estimation of the quantum nonlocality also shows up to d = 4096 by measuring the density matrix of the entangled state.
Methods
Measurements on single entangled photon pairs
To realize the measurements according to Eq. (7), the probabilities are determined by firstly performing local transformation on photons. We use HWP and QWP to perform the required rotations of polarization states. See Fig. 2. The HWP and QWP can be described by the following transformations, respectively^{27}:
where denotes the photon state with horizontal (vertical) polarization. Hence, with combination of both wave plates, the local transformation for polarization state is
To implement measurements onto the state sets and , the angular settings of HWP for the qubits of Alice and Bob are designed as
respectively. After such transformations, the states and will become horizontalpolarization states and . Thus determining the joint probability of measuring and for P(A_{a}, B_{b}) is equivalent to measuring the joint probability P(H, H) on the mth entangled photon pair [U(θ_{A}) ⊗ U(θ_{B})]ρ_{ϕm}[U(θ_{A}) ⊗ U(θ_{B})]^{†}.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Lo, H.P. et al. Experimental violation of Bell inequalities for multidimensional systems. Sci. Rep. 6, 22088; doi: 10.1038/srep22088 (2016).
References
Bell, J. S. On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox. Physics (Long Island City, N.Y.) 1, 195–200 (1964).
Clauser, J., Horne, M., Shimony, A. & Holt, R. Proposed Experiment to Test Local HiddenVariable Theories. Phys Rev Lett 23, 880–884 (1969).
Kaszlikowski, D., Gnacinski, P., Zukowski, M., Miklaszewski, W. & Zeilinger, A. Violations of Local Realism by Two Entangled NDimansional Systems Are Stronger than for Two Qubits. Phys Rev Lett 85, 4418–4421 (2000).
Collins, D., Gisin, N., Linden, N., Massar, S. & Popescu, S. Bell Inequalities for Arbitrarily HighDimensional Systems. Phys Rev Lett 88, 040404 (2002).
Son, W., Lee, J. & Kim, M. S. Generic Bell Inequalities for Multipartite Arbitrary Dimensional Systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 060406 (2006).
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. & Rosen, N. Can QuantumMechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935).
Schrödinger, E. Die gegenwartige situation in der quantenmechanik. Naturwissenschaften 23, 807–812; 823–828; 844–849 (1935).
Bell, J. S. Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK (1987).
Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK (2000).
Pan, J.W., Chen, Z.B., Zukowski, M., Weinfurter, H. & Zeilinger, A. Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry. Rev Mod Phys 84, 777–838 (2012).
Vaziri, A., Weihs, G. & Zeilinger, A. Experimental TwoPhoton, ThreeDimensional Entanglement for Quantum Communication. Phys Rev Lett 89, 240401 (2002).
Gröblacher, S., Jennewein, T., Vaziri, A., Weihs, G. & Zeilinger, A. Experimental quantum cryptography with qutrits. New J Phys 8, 75 (2006).
Zhou, D. L., Zeng, B., Xu, Z. & Sun, C. P. Quantum computation based on dlevel cluster state. Phys Rev A 68, 062303 (2003).
Looi, S. Y., Yu, L., Gheorghiu, V. & Griffiths, R. B. Quantumerrorcorrecting codes using qudit graph states. Phys Rev A 78, 042303 (2008).
Lloyd, S. Enhanced Sensitivity of Photodetection via Quantum Illumination. Science 321, 1463–1465 (2008).
Dada, A. C., Leach, J., Buller, G. S., Padgett, M. J. & Andersson, E. Experimental highdimensional twophoton entanglement and violations of generalized Bell inequalities. Nat Phys 7, 677–680 (2011).
Mair, A., Vaziri, A., Weihs, G. & Zeilinger, A. Entanglement of the orbital angular momentum states of photons. Nature (London) 412, 313–316 (2001).
Allen, L., Beijersbergen, M. W., Spreeuw, R. J. C. & Woerdman, J. P. Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of LaguerreGaussian laser modes. Phys Rev A 45, 8185–8189 (1992).
Romero, J., Giovannini, D., FrankeArnold, S., Barnett, S. M. & Padgett, M. J. Increasing the dimension in highdimensional twophoton orbital angular momentum entanglement. Phys Rev A 86, 012334 (2012).
Krenn, M. et al. A. Generation and confirmation of a (100 × 100)dimensional entangled quantum system. PNAS 111, 6243–6247 (2014).
Kwiat, P. G. et al. New highintensity source of polarizationentangled photon pairs. Phys Rev Lett 75, 4337–4341 (1995).
Lo, H. P., Yabushita, A., Luo, C. W., Chen, P. & Kobayashi, T. Beamlike photonpair generation for twophoton interference and polarization entanglement. Phys Rev A 83, 022313 (2011).
Lo, H. P., Yabushita, A., Luo, C. W., Chen, P. & Kobayashi, T. Beamlike photon pairs entangled by a 2 × 2 fiber. Phys Rev A 84, 022301 (2011).
Lo, H. P., Yabushita, A. & Kobayashi, T. Photon doughnutshaped pair for easy production of entangled photon pairs. Phys Rev A 91, 062327 (2015).
Vogel, K. & Risken, H. Determination of quasiprobability distributions in terms of probability distributions for the rotated quadrature phase. Phys Rev A 40, 2847–2849 (1989).
Hradil, Z., Řeháček, J., Fiurášek, J. & Ježek, M. MaximumLikelihood Methods in Quantum Mechanics. Lecture Notes in Physics 649, 59–112 (2004).
James, D. F. V., Kwiat, P. G., Munro, W. J. & White, A. G. Measurement of qubits. Phys Rev A 64, 052312 (2001).
Terha, B. M. & Horodecki, P. Schmidt number for density matrices. Phys Rev A 61, 040301(R) (2000).
Li, C.M., Chen, K., Reingruber, A., Chen, Y.N. & Pan, J.W. Verifying Genuine HighOrder Entanglement. Phys Rev Lett 105, 210504 (2010).
Sanpera, A. & Bruß, D. Lewenstein M. Schmidtnumber witnesses and bound entanglement. Phys Rev A 63, 050301(R) (2001).
Zhang, Q. et al. Experimental quantum teleportation of a twoqubit composite system. Nat Phys 2, 678–682 (2006).
Yao, X.C. et al. Observation of eightphoton entanglement. Nat Photonics 6, 225–228 (2012).
Monz, T. et al. 14Qubit Entanglement: Creation and Coherence. Phys Rev Lett 106, 130506 (2011).
Johansson, J. R., Lambert, N., Mahboob, I., Yamaguchi, H. & Nori, F. Entangledstate generation and Bell inequality violations in nanomechanical resonators. Phys Rev B 90, 174307 (2014).
Wei, L. F., Liu, Y. X. & Nori, F. Testing Bell’s inequality in constantly coupled Josephson circuits by effective singlequbit operations. Phys Rev B 72, 104516 (2005).
Wei, L. F., Liu, Y. X., Storcz, M. J. & Nori, F. Macroscopic EinsteinPodolskyRosen pairs in superconducting circuits. Phys Rev A 73, 052307 (2006).
Ashhab, S., Maruyama, K., Brukner, C. & Nori, F. Bell’s experiment with intra and interpair entanglement: Singleparticle mode entanglement as a case study. Phys Rev A 80, 062106 (2009).
Chen, Y.A. et al. Memorybuiltin quantum teleportation with photonic and atomic qubits. Nat Phys 4, 103 (2008).
Yuan, Z.S. et al. Entangled photons and quantum communication. Phys Rep 497, 1 (2010).
Yang, T. et al. Allversusnothing violation of local realism by twophoton, fourdimensional entanglement. Phys Rev Lett 95, 240406 (2005).
Chen, K. et al. Experimental realization of oneway quantum computing with twophoton fourqubit cluster states. Phys Rev Lett 99, 120503 (2007).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, Republic of China (Contract No. 1012112M009002MY2, 1032112M009008, 1012112M006016MY3, 1012628M006003MY3, 1012112M009016MY2, 1032119M009004MY3, 1032628M009002MY3, 1032923M009001MY3, 1032112M006017MY4, 1042112M009001MY2 and 1042112M006016MY3) and the Grant MOE ATU Program at NCTU.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
H.P.L., A.Y., C.W.L. and T.K. carried out the experiment; C.M.L. devised the theoretical and experimental scheme and Y.N.C. provided the theoretical analysis; H.P.L., A.Y., C.W.L. and T.K. conceived the experiment and analysed the data; and all authors cowrote the paper.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Lo, HP., Li, CM., Yabushita, A. et al. Experimental violation of Bell inequalities for multidimensional systems. Sci Rep 6, 22088 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22088
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Further reading

From contextuality of a single photon to realism of an electromagnetic wave
npj Quantum Information (2019)

Bell’s inequality tests via correlated diffraction of highdimensional positionentangled twophoton states
Scientific Reports (2018)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.