Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Low-temperature growth of layered molybdenum disulphide with controlled clusters

Abstract

Layered molybdenum disulphide was grown at a low-temperature of 350 °C using chemical vapour deposition by elaborately controlling the cluster size. The molybdenum disulphide grown under various sulphur-reaction-gas to molybdenum-precursor partial-pressure ratios were examined. Using spectroscopy and microscopy, the effect of the cluster size on the layered growth was investigated in terms of the morphology, grain size, and impurity incorporation. Triangular single-crystal domains were grown at an optimized sulphur-reaction-gas to molybdenum-precursor partial-pressure ratio. Furthermore, it is proved that the nucleation sites on the silicon-dioxide substrate were related with the grain size. A polycrystalline monolayer with the 100-nm grain size was grown on a nucleation site confined substrate by high-vacuum annealing. In addition, a field-effect transistor was fabricated with a MoS2 monolayer and exhibited a mobility and on/off ratio of 0.15 cm2 V−1 s−1 and 105, respectively.

Introduction

Diverse research has shown that graphene is a promising candidate for analogues of conventional electronic devices1,2,3. Although it possesses the extraordinary properties of a high electron mobility, elasticity, heat conductivity, and flexibility, graphene is not suitable for transistor and photonic devices owing to the lack of a bandgap (0 eV for pristine graphene). Molybdenum disulphide (MoS2), a layered structural material which coheres by the covalent bonding of one molybdenum atom between two sulphur atoms and interlayer van der Waals forces, has emerged as a new two-dimensional (2D) material owing to its tuneable band gap [from an indirect bandgap of 1.2 eV (bulk) to a direct bandgap of 1.8 eV (monolayer)]4 and ambient stability5.

The fabrication of a MoS2 monolayer was first attempted by a micromechanical exfoliation method similar to the approach used for the fabrication of graphene, and the possibility of using MoS2 as a channel material for a field-effect transistor (FET) was verified6,7. Recent achievements8 in obtaining high-performance FET devices using MoS2 as a channel material with a dielectric screening method9,10 gave rise to a number of synthetic processes such as micromechanical11,12,13,14 and chemical exfoiliation15,16, lithiation17, thermolysis18,19, and two-step thermal evaporation20. Subsequently, the sulphurization of a pre-deposited Mo21,22 was developed, and it was shown that sulphurization is a somewhat suitable method for the synthesis of large-area MoS2. However, MoS2 fabricated by the sulphurization of a pre-deposited Mo exhibit non-uniformity and a low field-effect mobility21 compared to exfoliated samples, and they occasionally grow perpendicular to the substrate22 because of ineffective incorporation of sulphur into the pre-deposited Mo. Chemical vapour deposition (CVD) is a well-known method for growing large-area MoS2. Lee et al. (ref. 23) demonstrated that CVD using molybdenum oxisulphides (MoO3−x) reduced from molybdenum trioxide (MoO3) and sulphur powder is a highly effective method for growing MoS2 atomic layers on a dielectric substrate. Studies24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32 with a similar method have demonstrated the effective growth of large-area24, high-quality MoS2 with a larger grain size25,26,27 and control of the number of layers31.

However, to the best of our knowledge, a feasible method for growing a MoS2 at low-temperatures of below 400 °C has not yet been reported, as it still requires the sulphurization of MoO3−x at high temperatures ranging from 650 to 850 °C. The 2D materials are suitable materials for next-generation electronic devices such as flexible, stretchable, and wearable devices. This devices normally fabricated based on plastic substrate. However, the melting temperature of most plastic substrates (PET, PEN, PI, etc.) are lower than 400 °C that makes impossible to use high-temperature approaches for direct growth. The conventional method to fabricate the flexible devices is using transfer of high-temperature grown 2D materials to plastic substrates33. This transfer method does not guarantee the productivity and reproducibility compared to direct growth owing to structure deformation (cracks and wrinkles)34,35 and remained polymer residues36. Thus, low-temperature growth method can open the cost- and time- effective method for fabrication of flexible devices. Notwithstanding the few works which demonstrated the possible methods for low-temperature growth37,38,39, the electrical performance of as-grown MoS2 were not reported but only the processes and characterization of samples were presented. Typically, higher temperatures facilitate the growth of a high-quality film owing to the small number of nuclei, the long diffusion length on the surface, and the effective desorption of volatile substances. However, at lower temperatures, the growth of high-quality films is challenging, especially for monolayer growth owing to the small critical radius for nucleation and the short diffusion length on the surface. Herein, we report a direct one-step low-temperature CVD process for the growth of high-quality layered MoS2 with control of the cluster size and the nucleation sites using Mo(CO)6 and hydrogen sulphide (H2S) as the precursor and reaction gas, respectively. Spectroscopic and microscopic analyses demonstrate that differently structured (3D or 2D) MoS2 are formed by changing the S-reaction-gas (PSR) to Mo-precursor (PMoP) partial-pressure ratio (PSR/PMoP), and monolayer islands of MoS2 with a grain size of 100 nm were grown on a nucleation-site-confined silicon dioxide (SiO2) substrate with an optimized PSR/PMoP. In addition, the electrical performance of back-gate FET device using monolayer MoS2 was examined.

Results and Discussion

It is known that a CVD process using Mo(CO)6 tend to create large aggregates40, Mo-based 3D structured films41,42 and films containing considerable amounts of carbides or oxides, such as Mo2C or MoOC, depending on the deposition conditions43. Although many disadvantages are caused by the carbonyl (CO) ligand radiating from the central Mo atom, lower decomposition temperature (Supplementary Fig. S1) make Mo(CO)6 a suitable precursor for low-temperature growth. To achieve the 2D growth of layered MoS2 at 350 °C, we developed a novel method that control the cluster size by feeding precise amount of Mo precursor and the nucleation sites on the SiO2 substrate by high-vacuum annealing. Although previous studies have verified that large amounts of carrier gas (Ar or H2) can facilitate decarbonylation38, the use of carrier gases is excluded in our experiment because large amounts of carrier gas eventually increase the absolute amount of precursor vapour. In order to examine our strategic approach, the experiment was carried out under various PSR/PMoP. The PMoP was precisely controlled using a chiller–heater unit connected to a precursor canister (Supplementary Fig. S2a). Growth was carried out using a showerhead-type reactor to assist in the creation of a uniform flow32 (Supplementary Fig. S2b). Before growth, the SiO2 substrate was pre-cleaned using acetone, isopropyl alcohol (IPA), and deionized (DI) water to prevent nucleation near dust particles26. Subsequently, the substrate was loaded into a load-lock chamber for several seconds to prevent any surface contamination under ambient conditions and transported to the main reactor followed by growth for a specific time at a substrate temperature of 350 °C at various Mo(CO)6 sublimation temperatures (0 to 80 °C) and H2S flow rates (10 to 100 sccm). In our preliminary experiment conducted with a lower PSR/PMoP, structural changes and impurities incorporation (Supplementary Fig. S3) in MoS2 depending on the cluster size were observed and revealed that the partial-pressure ratio is the key parameter for 2D growth (Supplementary Fig. S3a). Figure 1a shows atomic force microscopy (AFM) images of various samples grown at different values of PSR/PMoP. At a lower PSR/PMoP (case 1 and 2), irregular 3D islands with small grain sizes were grown. As PSR/PMoP (case 3) increases, the morphology was changed to a mixed structure which was consisted of irregular 3D islands and 2D triangular islands. At a much higher PSR/PMoP, the structure completely changed to 2D triangular islands with larger grain sizes (case 4). The fact that 3D structural MoS2 formation at lower PSR/PMoP compare to higher PSR/PMoP may affected by cluster formation in gas phase. At a lower PSR/PMoP, a larger amount of Mo(CO)6 vapour sublimes and larger-size MoS2 clusters are formed by the gas-phase reactions. Consequently, the formed clusters were adsorbed onto the surface, and 3D MoS2 islands were grown (Fig. 1b). At a higher PSR/PMoP, quasi-2D MoS2 islands are grown on the surface by desorbing volatile by-products and transformed into monolayer MoS2 by surface diffusion (Fig. 1c). The Raman spectroscopy results of the grown MoS2 are in agreement with the corresponding atomic structure measurement results (Fig. 1d). The difference between two Raman modes (∆k) resulting from in-plane vibration (E12g) and out-of-plane vibration (A1g) was measured 21.7 cm−1 for MoS2 grown at a lower PSR/PMoP (cases 1–3) owing to the coincidence of monolayer and bilayer MoS2 (Fig. 1d), and it further decreased to 18.8 cm−1 at a higher PSR/PMoP (case 4) with a decrease in the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the E12g mode (Fig. 1e) and an increase in the photoluminescence (Fig. 1f). The FWHM of the PL spectra at higher PSR/PMoP (case 4, Fig. 1f) measured as 26.3 nm, in comparable with high-temperature grown MoS227. These results indicate that 2D structural MoS2 could be grown at under the higher PSR/PMoP condition. The formation of 2D islands is elucidated by a theoretical consideration of the chemical potential and surface energy. Schweiger et al. (ref. 44) revealed that the type of edge termination (Mo- or S-edge) and the coverage by sulphur atoms of the monolayer MoS2 cluster were affected by the chemical potential of sulphur and the relationship with the corresponding parameters such as the ratio of S to Mo (Supplementary Fig. S4). Under strongly sulphiding conditions (high H2S partial pressure), the lower chemical potential of sulphur causes 100% coverage of the Mo edge (or S edge) by 100% sulphur to have the lowest surface energy. Under these conditions, the layer atoms are more strongly attracted to the substrate than to themselves, thereby facilitating 2D growth. The S-to-Mo ratios of 1.37, 1.99, 1.95, and 2.27 were measured for MoS2 grown from lower to higher values of PSR/PMoP from X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic (XPS) analyses (Fig. 1g,h). These observations explain the structural changes and demonstrate that control of cluster size and strongly sulphiding conditions are a crucial factor for the layered growth of a MoS2 at lower temperatures.

Figure 1: MoS2 with different structures and their growth mechanisms.
figure1

(a) AFM images of MoS2 with different structures (3D: cases 1 and 2, 3D+2D: case 3, 2D: case 4) grown at various values of PSR/PMoP. The scale bar is 200 nm. The measured height profiles of the islands are shown in the inset figures (scale bar: 20 nm) indicated by the open yellow rectangles. (b,c) Illustration of our cluster-size control mechanism. Larger MoS2 clusters were formed by a gas-phase reaction at a lower PSR/PMoP (b) whereas the formation of clusters was limited at a higher PSR/PMoP (c). (d,e) Corresponding Raman spectra of each sample. The values of ∆k decreased from 21.7 to 18.8 cm−1 at PSR/PMoP = 73 (d). The FWHMs of the two dominant modes decreased from 17.84 to 6.27 cm−1 (E12g) and 8.68 to 6.75 cm−1 (A1g) (e). Silicon peak (520.8 cm−1) used for normalization. (f) Photoluminescence spectra of each sample. A higher intensity indicates that high-quality MoS2 was grown. (g,h) XPS spectra of each sample. The presence of Mo6+ in case 1 shows that oxides are incorporated with Mo.

The grain size of polycrystalline 2D materials is the most important characteristic for determining its physical and electrical properties45. At lower temperatures, the grain size of 2D materials is much smaller than those at higher temperatures owing to the small diffusion length on the surface. We observed single-crystal monolayer MoS2 domains grown at various values of PSR/PMoP by AFM (Supplementary Fig. S5). However, no grain sizes greater than 50 nm were observed under even strongly sulphiding conditions (PSR/PMoP = 594). This experiment reveals the existence of a grain-size limit at 350 °C. To overcome this limitation due to the short diffusion length on the surface, nucleation sites were artificially manipulated by annealing the substrate in high-vacuum. To examine the effect of nucleation-site manipulation on the grain size, we grew monolayer MoS2 on three different substrates: piranha (H2SO4:H2O2 = 3:1)-treated, bare, and high-vacuum annealed SiO2 substrates, as seen in Fig. 2. A larger number of triangular MoS2 islands with the smaller grain size was created on the piranha-treated substrate (Fig. 2a), whereas a smaller number of islands with the larger grain size was created on the vacuum-annealed substrate (Fig. 2c) compared to that of the bare SiO2 substrate (Fig. 2b). It is known that the hydroxylated or hydrogen-passivated dangling bonds of amorphous SiO2 provide many reactive surface sites compared to an unsaturated surface46,47. In contrast, the high-vacuum annealing treatment dissociates the hydrogen-passivated dangling-bond entities47,48. To clarify the nucleation and growth mechanism on the different substrates, the AFM images obtained at different growth times demonstrate that the MoS2 nuclei occupy every preferred nucleation site during the early phase of growth and then attach to the edges of as-grown monolayer islands, and no more nucleation was observed during growth (Supplementary Fig. S6). The monolayer MoS2 islands were grown up to 100 nm on the nucleation-site-confined substrate. For the growth of MoS2 with larger grain sizes at lower temperatures, it is crucial to manipulate the affinity of the nuclei and the substrate; thus, the grain-size limitation can be overcome. The effect of substrate temperature on grain size was also examined (Supplementary Fig. S7). The grain size and FWHM of E12g mode of grown MoS2 were decreased by decreasing temperature owing to short diffusion length on the surface.

Figure 2: Nucleation site effect.
figure2

(a–c) AFM images of MoS2 monolayer islands grown on different substrates: (a) piranha-treated, (b) bare, and (c) high-vacuum annealed. The piranha treatment passivates the dangling bonds, whereas the high-vacuum annealing de-passivates the passivated dangling bonds in bare SiO2. Larger-size islands were grown on the high-vacuum annealed SiO2 substrate owing to the confined nucleation site. The growth time is 12 h and PSR/PMoP = 314. The scale bar is 100 nm.

The number of a MoS2 layer has been conventionally controlled by modulating the thickness of the pre-deposited Mo21, the surface energy31, or the supersaturation38. The grown MoS2 using our method exhibit the characteristic of layered growth (the detailed growth process is shown in Supplementary Fig. S8) without changing other parameters. Different surface colours were observed for different numbers of layers in Fig. 3a, in which highly uniform large-area MoS2 were grown on 1 × 1 cm2 SiO2 substrates and grown at the wafer scale up to 3” in size (Supplementary Fig. S9), as confirmed by an ellipsometry mapping analysis. We also used Raman spectroscopy and photoluminescence measurements to confirm the thickness of the as-grown MoS2. The Raman spectrum of each sample exhibits red and blue shifts of the E12g and A1g, respectively, as the number of layers increases (Fig. 3b). The ∆k values were measured to be 18.8, 22.6, 23.6, 24.5, and 25 cm−1 (Fig. 3c) from monolayer to pentalayer49,50. The normalized intensity was increased for thicker MoS2 owing to optical interference effect on SiO2/Si49. When the substrate temperature decreased to 250 °C, the bilayer islands were grown on uncovered monolayer MoS2 owing to short diffusion length (Supplementary Fig. S7). The two dominant absorption peaks (near 670 and 620 nm) correspond to two direct excitonic transitions (A1 and B1, respectively) which were observed from the photoluminescence measurements. The intensity of A1 direct excitonic transition was decreased and shifted to the red with increasing number of layer (Supplementary Fig. S8i), in agreement with previous reports4,5. Our cluster-size control method provides a feasible way for the layered growth of MoS2 at the wafer scale and open the effective way for the photoelectric device applications without transfer process.

Figure 3: Layered MoS2.
figure3

(a) Photograph of bare SiO2 and monolayer to pentalayer MoS2 grown onto a 1 × 1 cm2 SiO2 substrate. The layer is controlled with the growth time and no other conditions are changed. (b,c) Raman spectra of layered MoS2. The E12g and A1g modes are red- and blue-shifted by increasing the number of layers, respectively. The values of ∆k were measured as 18.8, 22.6, 23.6, 24.5, and 25 cm−1 for monolayer to pentalayer MoS2. (d), Photoluminescence of layered MoS2. Two dominant absorption peaks (near 670 and 620 nm) corresponding to two direct excitonic transitions (A1 and B1) are observed, and their intensities decrease as the number of layers increases. The indirect bandgap transition is not observable in multi-layered samples, which is the usual phenomenon on a SiO2 substrate.

The atomic structure of an as-grown monolayer MoS2 was evaluated by aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy (Cs-STEM) high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) imaging. Figure 4a shows a low-magnification STEM-HAADF image of a MoS2 monolayer transferred onto a carbon grid by a conventional wet-etching method. The white region represents the overlapping MoS2 monolayer during transfer, and the grey region indicates a polycrystalline MoS2 monolayer. The approximate domain size is 100 nm and is in agreement with our previous observations using AFM (Supplementary Fig. S6b). The high-magnification HAADF image of the selected area shows the atomic structure of the grain boundary by two triangular domains (Fig. 4b). The fast Fourier transform (FFT) patterns in the inset of Fig. 4b indicate the hexagonal structures of the two single-crystal MoS2 domains with a 31° tilt angle. From the image reconstructed by smoothing and Fourier filtering (Fig. 4c), a uniform single-crystal MoS2 domain was observed, and the merge to create a grain boundary (indicated by the dashed white line in Fig. 4c), thereby forming a polycrystalline MoS2 monolayer. Moreover, the samples grown at a higher PSR/PMoP exhibit better quality compared to those grown at a lower PSR/PMoP (Supplementary Fig. S10). This microscopic observation reveals that a highly uniform and large-grain MoS2 polycrystalline monolayer was grown even at 350 °C. Furthermore, the domain structure and grain boundary closely resemble MoS2 grown at higher temperature. The low-temperature grown monolayer MoS2 was used to fabricate a back-gate FET to examine the electrical performance. The device was fabricated with a MoS2 monolayer without patterning and has a channel length and width of 5 and 10 μm, respectively (inset in Fig. 4d). The MoS2 monolayer was not treated after growth, and measurements were obtained at room temperature under ambient conditions. The FET device exhibits conventional n-type semiconductor behaviour with a mobility of 0.15 cm2V−1s−1 (Fig. 4d). The maximum on/off ratio was 105 in the gate-voltage range of −150 to 150 V with a 5-V source–drain bias voltage that was ten times lower than high-temperature grown MoS2 by using CVD24,25,26,27 and exfoliated MoS2 (1–10 cm2V−1s−1).

Figure 4: Atomic structures and electrical performance.
figure4

(a) Low-magnification STEM-HAADF image of polycrystalline monolayer MoS2. Triangular single domains with an approximate size of 100 nm can be observed and create grain boundaries. (b) High-magnification STEM-HAADF image of a grain boundary. Two adjacent single-crystal domains create a grain boundary with a 31° tilt angle. The inset shows the FFT pattern which shows the hexagonal structure of the MoS2 monolayer. (c), Smoothed and Fourier-filtered image of Fig. 4b. Highly uniform and defect-free structures are observed with brighter Mo atoms and darker S atoms. (d) The electrical characteristics of the fabricated FET devices with a 5 μm and 10 μm channel length and width (Inset, scale bar: 5 μm). A mobility of 0.15 cm2V−1s−1 and a maximum on/off ratio of 105 at 5 V are measured with an applied back-gate voltage ranging from −150 to 150 V and a bias voltage from 1 to 5 V. The monolayer MoS2 was not patterned.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we developed a novel method for the layered growth of large area and high-quality MoS2 compare to other low-temperature method at a low-temperature of 350 °C using Mo(CO)6 by controlling the cluster size and nucleation sites. Furthermore, we first demonstrate the potential use of low-temperature grown MoS2 as practical FET device. A structural transition from 3D clusters to 2D monolayers by changing PSR/PMoP and controlling the grain size with confined nucleation sites were demonstrated. These two parameters are key factors for the low-temperature growth of the layered MoS2. The low-temperature growth of 2D materials represented by graphene and transition-metal dichalcogenides is crucial for the application of next-generation flexible and wearable devices. Thus, our results suggest novel approaches for the preparation of 2D materials under lower temperature conditions.

Methods

Growth process

Layered MoS2 was grown by a showerhead-type reactor using Mo(CO)6 (≥99.9%, Sigma Aldrich, CAS number 13939-06-5) as a precursor. Highly doped (<0.005 Ω·cm) p-type Si with a 300-nm-thick SiO2 layer was used as the substrate. The substrates were pre-cleaned and placed onto a silicon carbide (SiC)-coated susceptor in a load-lock chamber within a short period to prevent any contamination in the ambient environment. The heating block in the CVD reactor was pre-heated to 350 °C before growth. The susceptor with the substrate was transferred to the reactor, and the substrate temperature was increased over a period of 10 min in an Ar flow having a purity of 99.999%. The growth was carried out using only sublimed precursor vapour with a high-purity H2S flow for growth times at a constant pressure of 0.5 Torr. The substrates were transferred to the load-lock chamber after growth and cooled down for 1 h with 100 sccm Ar flow (Supplementary Fig. S2a). The treatment after growth was not carried out with any known method (such as Ar and H2S annealing at a high temperature). All analyses and characterization were performed using as-grown samples.

AFM measurement

The morphology, grain size, and nucleation and growth processes were evaluated using AFM (XE-150, Park Systems). For better quality, an image was measured using a super sharp silicon tip with a radius of curvature of <5 nm (SSS-NCHR, NANOSENSORS). A soft X-ray ionizer module was applied to prevent electrostatic charge during measurement. The image was taken over a 1 or 2 μm2 area with a 512 × 512 pixel resolution and a measurement speed of 0.5 Hz. The images were resized to 750 nm2.

Spectroscopy

Raman spectroscopy measurements were carried out using a DXR Raman Microscope (Thermo Scientific). A laser with an excitation wavelength of 532 nm, a spot size of 0.7 μm, and a power of 8 mW was used. The approximate spectral resolution is 0.5 cm−1, and the 520.8 cm−1 Si peak was used for normalization. Photoluminescence (LabRam ARAMIS, Horiba Jobin Yvon) measurements of the grown samples were carried out with a wavelength of 514 nm and a laser power of 10 mW. The ellipsometry (M2000D, J. A. Woollam Co.) mapping measurements were carried out with a 0.5-cm step size. The thickness results were extracted by multi-layer (four-layer model, air/MoS2/SiO2/Si) modelling. XPS (SES-100, VG-SCIENTA) measurements were conducted using a non-monochromatic magnesium Kα source under ultra-high vacuum conditions (<10−8Torr).

TEM sample preparation

Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) (950 A2, MicroChem) was spin-coated on as-grown MoS2/SiO2/Si samples at 4,000 rpm for 60 s. The SiO2 layer was etched away by immersing the coated samples in a buffered oxide etch (BOE) solution (6:1, J.T.Baker). The detached PMMA/MoS2 was rinsed several times with DI water and then simply placed onto carbon grids (HC300-CU, Electron Microscopy Sciences). PMMA was removed by annealing under high-vacuum conditions (<10−5Torr) at 300 °C for 30 min (see ref. 25).

HAADF-STEM

HAADF-STEM images were taken using Cs-STEM (Titan cubed G2 60-300, FEI) operated at 300 kV with a 50–100 pA screen current and a 19.3 mrad convergence angle. The images were further smoothed and Fourier filtered to improve the contrast.

Electrical performance measurement

The back-gate FET device was fabricated by using electron-beam evaporation to deposit Ti/Au (5/50 nm) electrodes directly onto an as-grown MoS2 monolayer. The electrode shapes were patterned using electron-beam lithography of a PMMA (950 C4, MicroChem) layer and developed with diluted MIBK (MIBK:IPA = 1:1, MicroChem) solution. The lift-off process was conducted by immersion into dichloromethane (DCM) and IPA and drying with high-purity N2 (99.999%). The electrical performance of the device was measured at room temperature under ambient conditions using an in-house four-probe station with a precision semiconductor parameter analyser (4156A, Hewlett-Packard). The device was not annealed.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Mun, J. et al. Low-temperature growth of layered molybdenum disulphide with controlled clusters. Sci. Rep. 6, 21854; doi: 10.1038/srep21854 (2016).

References

  1. 1

    Novoselov, K. S. et al. Electrical field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306, 666–669 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Berger, C. et al. Ultrathin epitaxial graphite: 2D electron gas properties and a route toward graphene-based nanoelectronics. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 19912–19916 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Neto, A. H. C., Guinea, F., Peres, N. M. R., Novoselov, K. S. & Geim, A. K. The electronic properties of graphene. Rev. Mode. Phys. 81, 109–161 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Mak, K. F., Lee, C., Hone, J., Shan, J. & Heinz, T. F. Atomically thin MoS2: A new direct-gap semiconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 136805 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Splendiani, A. et al. Emerging photoluminescence in monolayer MoS2 . Nano Lett. 10, 1271–1275 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Novoselov, K. S. et al. Two-dimensional atomic crystals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 10451–10453 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Ayari, A., Cobas, E., Ogundadegbe, O. & Fuhrer, M. S. Realization and electrical characterization of ultrathin crystals of layered transition-metal dichalcogenides. J. Appl. Phys. 101, 014507 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Radisavljevic, B., Radenovic, A., Brivio, J., Giacometti, V. & Kis, A. Single-layer MoS2 transistor. Nature Nanotech. 6, 147–150 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Jena, D. & Konar, A. Enhancement of carrier mobility in semiconductor nanostructures by dielectric engineering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 136805 (2007).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Chen, F., Xia, J., Ferry, D. K. & Tao, N. Dielectric screening enhanced performance in graphene FET. Nano Lett. 9, 2571–2574 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Lee, H. S. et al. MoS2 nanosheet phototransistors with thickness-modulated optical energy gap. Nano Lett. 12, 3695–3700 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Yin, Z. et al. Single-layer MoS2 phototransistors. ACS Nano 6, 74–80 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Wang, H. et al. Integrated circuits based on bilayer MoS2 transistors. Nano Lett. 12, 4674–4680 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Radisavljevic, B. & Kis, A. Mobility engineering and a metal-insulator transition in monolayer MoS2 . Nature Mater. 12, 815–820 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Eda, G. et al. Photoluminescence from chemically exfoliated MoS2 . Nano Lett. 11, 5111–5116 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Lukowski, M. A. et al. Enhanced hydrogen evolution catalysis from chemically exfoliated metallic MoS2 nanosheets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 10274–10277 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Zeng, Z. et al. Single-layer semiconducting nanosheets: High-yield preparation and device fabrication. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 11093–11097 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Liu, K.-K. et al. Growth of large-area and highly crystalline MoS2 thin layers on insulating substrates. Nano Lett. 12, 1538–1544 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Shi, Y. et al. van der Waals epitaxy of MoS2 layers using graphene as growth templates. Nano Lett. 12, 2784–2791 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Balendhran, S. et al. Atomically thin layers of MoS2 via a two step thermal evaporation-exfoliation method. Nanoscale 4, 461–466 (2012)

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Zhan, Y., Liu, Z., Najmaei, S., Ajayan, P. M. & Lou, J. Large-area vapor-phase growth and characterization of MoS2 atomic layers on SiO2 substrate. Small 8, 966–971 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Jung, Y. et al. Metal seed layer thickness-induced transition from vertical to horizontal growth of MoS2 and WS2 . Nano Lett. 14, 6842–6849 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Lee, Y.-H. et al. Synthesis of large-area MoS2 atomic layers with chemical vapor deposition. Adv. Mater. 24, 2320–2325 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Lin, Y. C. et al. Wafer-scale MoS2 thin layers prepared by MoO3 sulfurization. Nanoscale 4, 6637–6641 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    van der Zande, A. M. et al. Grains and grain boundaries in highly crystalline monolayer molybdenum disulphide. Nature Mater. 12, 554–561 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Najmaei, S. et al. Vapour phase growth and grain boundary structure of molybdenum disulphide atomic layers. Nature Mater. 12, 754–759 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Zhang, J. et al. Scalable growth of high-quality polycrystalline MoS2 monolayers on SiO2 with tunable grain sizes. ACS Nano 8, 6024–6030 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Wu, S. et al. Vapor-solid growth of high optical quality MoS2 monolayers with near-unity valley polarization. ACS Nano 7, 2768–2772 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Cheng, Y. et al. van der Waals epitaxial growth of MoS2 on SiO2/Si by chemical vapor deposition. RSC Adv. 3, 17287–17293 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Ling, X. et al. Role of seeding promoter in MoS2 growth by chemical vapor deposition. Nano Lett. 14, 464–472 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Jeon, J. et al. Layer-controlled CVD growth of large-area two-dimensional MoS2 films. Nanoscale 7, 1688–1695 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Wang, S. et al. Shape evolution of monolayer MoS2 crystals grown by chemical vapor deposition. Chem. Mater. 26, 6371–6379 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Bae, S. et al. Roll-to-roll production of 30-inch graphene films for transparent electrodes. Nature Mater. 5, 574–578 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Li, X. et al. Transfer of Large-Area Graphene Films for High-Performance Transparent Conductive Electrodes. Nano Lett. 9, 4359–4363 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Suk, J. W. et al. Transfer of CVD-grown monolayer graphene onto arbitrary substrates. ACS nano. 5, 6916–6924 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Her, M., Beams, R. & Novotny, L. Graphene transfer with reduced residue. Phys. Lett. A. 377, 1455–1458 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Song, I. et al. Patternable large-scale molybdenum disulfide atomic layers grown by gold-assisted chemical vapor deposition. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 1266–1269 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Kumar, V. K., Dhar, S., Choudhury, T. H., Shivashankar, S. A. & Raghavan. S. A. Predictive approach to CVD of crystalline layers of TMDs: The case of MoS2 . Nanoscale 7, 7802–7810 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Wang, J. et al. Direct growth of molybdenum disulphide on arbitrary insulating surfaces by chemical vapor deposition. RSC Advances 5, 4364–4367 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Close, M. R., Petersen, J. L. & Kugler, E. L. Synthesis and characterization of nanoscale molybdenum sulfide catalysts by controlled gas phase decomposition of Mo(CO)6 and H2S. Inorg. Chem. 38, 1535–1542 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Rodriguez, J. A., Dvorak, J., Jirsak, T. & Hrbek, J. Formation of Mo and MoSx nanoparticles on Au(111) from Mo(CO)6 and S2 precursors: Electronic and chemical properties. Surf. Sci. 490, 315–326 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Liu, P., Rodriguez, J. A., Muckerman, J. T. & Hrbek, J. The deposition of Mo nanoparticles on Au(111) from a Mo(CO)6 precursor: Effect of CO on Mo–Au intermixing. Surf. Sci. 530, L313–L321 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Suhr, H., Schmid, R. & Sturmer,W. Plasma reaction of group VI metal carbonyls. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 12, 147–159 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Schweiger, H., Raybaud, P., Kresse, G. & Toulhoat, H. Shape and edge sites modifications of MoS2 catalytic nanoparticles induced by working conditions: A theoretical study. J. Catal. 207, 76–87 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Yu, Q. et al. Control and characterization of individual grains and grain boundaries in graphene grown by chemical vapour deposition. Nature. Mater. 10, 443–449 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Goumans, T. P. M., Wander, A., Brown, W. A. & Catlow. C. R. A. Structure and stability of the (001) α-quartz surface. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 9, 2146–2152 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Lee, J., Lee, N., Lansac, Y. & Jang, Y. H. Charge inhomogeneity of graphene on SiO2: Dispersion-corrected density functional theory study on the effect of reactive surface sites. RSC Adv. 4, 37236–37243 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Stesmans, A. & Van Gorp, G. Maximum density of Pb centers at the (111)Si/SiO2 interface after vacuum anneal. Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 2663–2665 (1990).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    Lee, C. et al. Anomalous lattice vibrations of single-and few-layer MoS2 . ACS Nano 4, 2695–2700 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Li, H. et al. From bulk to monolayer MoS2: Evolution of Raman scattering. Adv. Funct. Mater. 22, 1385–1390 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) (Project No. 10050296, Large scale (Over 8”) synthesis and evaluation technology of 2-dimensional chalcogenides for next generation electronic devices). This work was also supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (No. 2009-0083540).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.W.K., T.K. and H.P. coordinated and supervised the project. J.M. developed method and carried out experiments. J. M. and S.J.L. carried out AFM and HAADF-STEM imaging experiments. I.S.K. and S.K.L. carried out device performance characterization and analysis. Optical spectroscopy and data analysis were carried out by J.M. and Y.K. under T.K. and S.W.K.’s supervision. J.W.K carried out XPS measurement and analysis. J.M., I.S.K., T.K. and S.W.K. wrote the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Taesung Kim or Sang-Woo Kang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mun, J., Kim, Y., Kang, IS. et al. Low-temperature growth of layered molybdenum disulphide with controlled clusters. Sci Rep 6, 21854 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21854

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing