Reproductive isolation is crucial for the process of speciation to progress. Sex chromosomes have been assigned a key role in driving reproductive isolation but empirical evidence from natural population processes has been restricted to organisms with degenerated sex chromosomes such as mammals and birds. Here we report restricted introgression at sex-linked compared to autosomal markers in a hybrid zone between two incipient species of European tree frog, Hyla arborea and H. orientalis, whose homologous X and Y sex chromosomes are undifferentiated. This large X-effect cannot result from the dominance or faster-X aspects of Haldane’s rule, which are specific to degenerated sex chromosomes, but rather supports a role for faster-heterogametic-sex or faster-male evolutionary processes. Our data suggest a prominent contribution of undifferentiated sex chromosomes to speciation.
Reproductive isolation is crucial for the process of speciation to progress, and biologists have started to learn about the genomics and ecology of evolving reproductive barriers1,2. Theory3 and empirical evidence4,5 suggest that sex chromosomes play a central role in the evolution of reproductive isolation between incipient species. Two rules based on empirical data imply that sex chromosomes contribute to the build-up of postzygotic isolation, i.e. hybrid fitness decrease, infertility or inviability. First, Haldane’s rule states that, if one sex is absent, rare, or sterile in an interspecific cross, this is usually the heterogametic sex6. This pattern is obeyed by the vast majority of animal taxa7,8,9, and evidence has recently been extended to plants10. Second, the large X-effect (also known as “Coyne’s rule” or “large Z-effect”) refers to the disproportionally high impact of X or Z chromosomes, compared to autosomes, in driving hybrid dysfunction11. Mapping of Quantitative Trait Loci and backcross analyses in Drosophila have provided compelling evidence that genetic factors with the largest effect on hybrid sterility tend to be X-linked12,13,14. So far, as for Drosophila, empirical evidence for both of these rules has been restricted to outcomes from interspecies crosses9,15, or in natural settings to organisms with differentiated sex chromosomes, like mammals and birds.
Several non-exclusive hypotheses predominate to account for Haldane’s rule and large-X-effect observations16. The dominance hypothesis suggests that, if alleles responsible for Dobzhanski-Muller incompatibilities are partially recessive, they will have a greater impact when located on hemizygous X (or Z) chromosomes, being exposed in the heterogametic sex17,18. In addition, such effects can accelerate the rate of genetic changes on X- or Z-linked genomic regions (i.e. the faster-X theory)3, which can also contribute to Haldane’s and Coyne’s empirical patterns. Namely, under the faster-X theory, exposure of recessive mutations to selection in hemizygotes and reduced effective population size relative to the autosomes are considered the major causes. Alternatively or in complement, the faster-male theory hypothesizes that stronger sexual selection on males would drive faster evolution of male-expressed genes19. This would result in more male than female incompatibilities in hybrids20,21, and can thus explain Haldane’s rule in XY systems. However, it remains unclear whether such incompatibilities accumulate non-randomly on sex chromosomes14. Finally, Dobzhanski-Muller incompatibilities may also involve X-Y (or Z-W) epistatic interactions, for example when complementary alleles on conspecific gametologs are required for proper meiotic segregation or sexual differentiation22,23, therefore having a disproportionate effect in the heterogametic sex (i.e. the faster-heterogametic sex hypothesis).
The relative contribution of sex chromosomes to postzygotic isolation is thus bound to the mechanisms involved. Notably, it is expected to depend on their level of degeneracy: the strong dominance and faster-X effects acting in species with heteromorphic sex chromosomes should not apply when these remain undifferentiated. Accordingly, F1 post-zygotic incompatibilities seem generally more severe in interspecies crosses with heteromorphic than with homomorphic24 or no sex chromosomes15. In clawed frogs, Xenopus, which possess homomorphic Z and W chromosomes, sex-reversal experiments have shown hybrid male sterility to depend on phenotypic (male or female) rather than genetic sex (ZZ or ZW), suggesting little responsibility of the sex chromosomes but still important faster-male effects; specifically, higher sensitivity to perturbations of spermatogenesis in a hybrid background25. Estimating the contribution of sex-linked genes to postzygotic isolation in taxa with different sex-determining systems and levels of sex-chromosome degeneracy can thus increase our understanding of the underlying mechanisms.
Hybrid zones present natural laboratories that have served to characterize the nature of reproductive barriers in many organisms26,27, including amphibians28,29,30. Thus, they appear highly suitable to evaluate the role of sex chromosomes. Indeed, patterns of sex chromosome introgression have been documented in organisms with differentiated sex chromosomes such as mammals31,32,33,34,35, birds36,37,38,39,40 and insects41,42. With few exceptions43, these studies reported restricted introgression at sex chromosomes, advocating their prominent role in driving speciation. However, it remains empirically unexplored whether this holds for species with homomorphic sex chromosomes, where dominance and faster-X effects are not at play, and whether this translates into differential introgression patterns in natural hybrid zones.
We address this open question in the European tree frogs Hyla arborea and H. orientalis, which feature undifferentiated sex chromosomes. These two species are non-sister taxa and have diverged approximately since the late Miocene (~5 My)44. After the last glaciation they expanded from the Balkan Peninsula to Western Europe (H. arborea), and from Asia Minor and Eastern Europe (H. orientalis), and now meet in secondary contact zones in several regions of Eastern Europe, with evidence for hybrids from central Poland to northern Greece44. In this southern part of their hybrid zone, H. arborea and H. orientalis exhibit limited mitochondrial and nuclear introgression (~30 km), restricted to few hybrid populations and sharp genomic transitions, in line with advanced reproductive isolation45. Both species inherited the same pair of homomorphic XY sex chromosomes from a common ancestor but X and Y gametologs remain genetically undifferentiated due to occasional recombination46,47,48,49.
In this study, we analyse patterns of introgression between these two species across their northern hybrid zone in lowland Poland. Postglacial geological history50 constrains this contact to be younger than 14 ka. We found strongly restricted introgression at sex-linked loci compared to other parts of the genome, indicating a large X-effect (or “large sex chromosome effect”). Given that dominance and faster-X processes are not at play in Hyla, this pattern implies mechanisms like faster-male and/or faster-heterogametic sex processes instead, and suggests that non-degenerate sex chromosomes can also contribute disproportionally to speciation.
Bayesian assignment of genome-wide individual microsatellite genotypes (29 loci) unambiguously recovered two groups (ΔLL K1→ 2 = 1916.9), corresponding to the gene pools of the two species. This strong two-group signal was confirmed by principal component analysis of individual microsatellite genotypes (File S1). Ancestry coefficients thus correspond to estimates of hybrid index (HI). We found signs of nuclear introgression (intermediate HI estimates) between H. arborea and H. orientalis over a 200 km wide zone with mosaic contacts and interspersed hybrid populations (e.g. localities 32–33, 36, 50; Fig. 1a) across central and northern Poland. Distribution of mitochondrial haplotypes yielded a similar picture with wider introgression: H. arborea mtDNA was frequently sampled further east within the H. orientalis range (e.g. localities 39–44, 50–52; Fig. 1b).
Comparison of averaged sex-linked vs. autosomal hybrid index (HI) revealed significantly less introgression at sex-linked than at autosomal markers (Fig. 2a). A wide range of hybrid types was sampled, exhibiting intermediate HI estimates for autosomes (i.e. 0 < HI < 1), but showing strongly limited introgression at sex-linked markers (i.e. HI closer to 0 or 1). The likelihood of this data was calculated conditioned on Fitzpatrick’s genome cline model51. Specifically, we compared two models, one assuming a single cline fitted to both autosomal and sex chromosomal data, and another involving two separate clines, one fitted to each marker type. The two-clines model had a significantly higher likelihood (Gtest ΔLL = 4.07, df = 2: P = 0.0003), strongly supporting reduced introgression of sex chromosome markers. Our inference was robust to three sources of uncertainty. First, 100 replicate STRUCTURE runs led to the same conclusion. Second, the effective sample size52 may be overestimated, but the inference remains significant even if the effective size is as low as 37% of the number of alleles sampled. Third, loci can vary in their relative contributions to the HI estimates due to differences in diagnosticity of their alleles, but the inference remained unchanged and significant when locus-specific contributions were considered. Furthermore, the inference signal is also present in subsets of the data: considering only “confirmed” hybrids (n = 32; Methods), the level of introgression significantly differed between autosomal and sex-linked markers (paired non-parametric Wilcoxon test, P = 4.0 e−6, Fig. 2b).
Additional analyses show that higher estimated admixture at autosomal loci is not caused by a lack of information about their source population: autosomal markers maintain a similar signal of greater admixture irrespective of whether they are analysed on their own or combined with the strong signal of the sex linked loci (Wilcoxon’s P = 2.0 e−10; File S2a–c). Moreover, to control for the lower statistical power of our sex-linked (n = 8 loci) than of the autosomal (n = 21 loci) marker set, we resampled and analysed 100 subsets of 8 randomly chosen autosomal markers: sex-linked introgression was significantly lower than autosomal introgression in all cases (File S2d). Thus, the lower estimates of admixture at sex-linked compared to autosomal markers in H. arborea/H. orientalis hybrids reflect real differential introgression rather than differences in marker informativeness.
European (H. arborea) and Eastern (H. orientalis) tree frogs form a mosaic hybrid zone in the northern parts of their contact across central Poland. Our data show significantly less introgression of sex-linked than of autosomal loci, providing evidence for a “large X-effect”. Applied to homomorphic sex chromosomes, we argue, that this term should rather be modified to “large sex chromosome effect”. Importantly, given homomorphy and occasional X-Y recombination of tree frog sex chromosomes, the dominance or faster-X models of Haldane’s rule, which require degenerate or silenced Y-chromosomes, cannot explain their restricted introgression. In both focal species, X and Y do not show sequence divergence along the chromosomes46,47,48 and in the northern parts of the H. arborea range, Y haplotypes have last recombined approximately 15000 years ago53, leaving not enough time for Y chromosome decay.
Our findings may rather be explained by faster-male and/or faster heterogametic sex evolution. Male frogs are expected to be under strong sexual selection due to female mate choice, especially in lek-breeding species such as tree frogs54. Faster-male effects on hybrid male sterility have been found in pipid frogs (Xenopus; see Introduction)25. However, this should only constrain sex-chromosome introgression if the genes involved in male sterility disproportionally map to the sex chromosomes, an assumption, which has received little support and which has been rejected for female heterogametic ZW Xenopus25. In contrast, faster-heterogametic sex effects necessarily imply interactions between X and Y chromosomes. Identifying and mapping genes with male-biased expression and differential introgression in Hyla should provide information to estimate the relative contributions of these two processes. Moreover, documenting patterns of meiotic segregation in hybrids might help infer a role for X-Y epistatic interactions. Our results are in line with anecdotal evidence of potential Haldane’s effects reported in a H. arborea × H. orientalis cross, exhibiting gonadal malformation in a single F1 male49. At present, we have no information about sex-biased asymmetric assortative mating (e.g. H. arborea females preferring H. orientalis males but H. orientalis females avoiding H. arborea males), which could contribute to the differential introgression observed. This seems unlikely, as it would require inverse sex-biased and/or species-biased cross-preferences. It also remains unclear whether sex-biased dispersal, undocumented in Hyla, could contribute to the observed pattern.
Our study thus provides the first population genetics evidence that even non-degenerate (homomorphic) sex chromosomes can play a disproportionate role in reproductive isolation between incipient species. It will be interesting to test if this pattern holds in other organisms with homomorphic sex chromosomes, which are widely found among amphibians and fishes, especially given their high diversity of sex-determining systems55,56. Seeking evidence for Haldane’s rule through experimental crosses may also illuminate the relative importance of mechanisms of speciation15. Systems with homomorphic sex chromosomes provide mixed support for Haldane’s rule, dependent on heterogamety: Haldane’s pattern is observed in the majority of male-heterogametic species tested (e.g. newts57, teleost fishes58,59,60,61,62) but evidence is lacking for female-heterogametic species (e.g. Xenopus63, some bufonid toads64, Populus trees65). If Haldane’s rule mostly arises from dominance and faster-male effects9, it should indeed not apply to ZW-systems with homomorphic sex chromosomes. Combining experimental studies of hybrid incompatibilities with population genomic analyses of differential introgression across natural hybrid zones will shed light on the mechanisms underlying postzygotic isolation.
Sampling and DNA extraction
Tree frogs were sampled during the breeding seasons (April-June, 2010–2013) from 60 localities throughout the lowlands of Poland (n = 578 individuals), where H. arborea and H. orientalis come into secondary contact44. DNA was obtained from non-invasive buccal swabs66 (adults) or ethanol-fixed tailtips (tadpoles) and extracted using the Qiagen Biosprint Robotic workstation. Details of sampling localities are available in File S3. Tree frog sampling was permitted by the General Directorate for Environmental Protection of Poland (Generalna Dyrekcja Ochrony Środowiska; No. DOP-oz.6401.02.28.2013.JRO). The collection of genetic material from tadpoles and adult frogs was carried out in accordance with approved guidelines and was performed with minimal or non-invasive techniques, respectively. Animals were released immediately after sampling. Procedures were approved by the local ethics committee for animal experiments (2. Lokalna Komisja Etyczna do Spraw Doświadczeń na Zwierzętach, Wrocław, permit no. 54/2013).
Mitotyping and genotyping
We inferred the mitochondrial haplogroups of 565 samples using a mitotyping procedure by restriction digest of cytochrome-b PCR products (described in ref.45). We genotyped 352 individuals from the contact zone for 29 microsatellite loci mapped throughout the genome in H. arborea, including 8 sex-linked and 21 autosomal67, cross-amplifying in both species68. Sex-linked markers cover the entire sex chromosome, as inferred from linkage mapping analyses48,67. Microsatellites were amplified in multiplexes68; amplicons were run on an ABI3100 genetic analyzer and scored with Genemapper 4.0 (Applied Biosystems). Details of markers and references are available in File S4 and have been archived at http://doi:10.5061/dryad.5jq64.
Population genetic analyses
In order to locate hybrid populations and document patterns of introgression between H. arborea and H. orientalis, we characterized the genetic structure throughout the study area using STRUCTURE69. We used the admixture model without prior on sample origin and tested from one to 11 groups (K) with 10 replicate runs per K, each run consisting of 100,000 iterations following a burn-in period of 10,000. The Evanno method70, implemented in STRUCTURE HARVESTER71, suggests K is not higher than 2. Replicates were combined with CLUMPP72 and graphical displays of ancestry coefficients (barplots) were built with DISTRUCT73. To confirm that the two tree frog lineages are genetically structured (i.e. K ≠ 1, which cannot be tested with the Evanno method), we performed a principal component analysis on individual microsatellite genotypes (R package adegenet)74. As the markers are highly informative in distinguishing between the two species (Results, see also refs45,68), the STRUCTURE coefficient of ancestry at K = 2 is a good estimator of the hybrid index (0: pure H. orientalis; 1: pure H. arborea). Individuals were considered as “confirmed” nuclear hybrids only if the 90% credible intervals (CIs) of their ancestry coefficient neither reached 0 nor 1. This conservative approach allows confidently assigned individuals to be distinguished from those with uninformative genotypes75.
To infer whether sex-chromosomes introgressed differentially as compared to the rest of the genome, we sampled the STRUCTURE ancestry posterior at each locus using the site-by-site output option, and computed average HI estimates for sex-linked and autosomal markers, respectively, for comparison with the global HI estimate. Where the geographic pattern of hybridization is complex, Szymura & Barton28 suggest comparison of introgressing loci to the overall hybrid index rather than geographic distance76. If introgression is homogeneous over the genome the expectation for the hybrid index at any subset of the markers is the same as the global estimate28. To assess whether this is the case at sex-linked vs autosomal marker subsets, we fitted 2-parameter genomic clines51 and tested whether a single cline can explain all marker types (2-parameters model) or two separate clines, one for each marker type (4-parameters model). Moreover, in “confirmed” hybrid individuals, differential introgression between marker sets was tested using non-parametric paired tests.
Since STRUCTURE ancestry estimates depend on both the level of admixture and the informativeness of genotypes, we ran additional analyses to control for this issue. First, we re-estimated autosomal and sex-linked hybrid indices independently in separate STRUCTURE runs. This confirms that each datasets is powerful enough on its own to distinguish between the species and that their introgression signals are sufficiently distinct that the distinction remains when STRUCTURE is run for genotypes combining both marker sets. Second, to account for differences in statistical power for detecting introgression due to the different number of markers in each set (8 and 21 sex-linked and autosomal loci respectively), and to ensure the average autosomal introgression signal was not unduly influenced by a few far-introgressing outliers, we computed autosomal hybrid indices from 100 resampled datasets of 8 randomly chosen loci.
How to cite this article: Dufresnes, C. et al. Empirical evidence for large X-effects in animals with undifferentiated sex chromosomes. Sci. Rep. 6, 21029; doi: 10.1038/srep21029 (2016).
Feder, J. L., Egan, S. P. & Nosil, P. The genomics of speciation-with-gene-flow. Trends Ecol Evol. 28, 342–350 (2012).
Seehausen, O. et al. Genomics and the origin of species. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 176–192 (2014).
Charlesworth, B., Coyne, J. & Barton, N. The relative rates of evolution of sex chromosomes and autosomes. Am. Nat. 130, 113–146 (1987).
Masly, J. P. & Presgraves, D. C. High-resolution genome-wide dissection of the two rules of speciation in Drosophila . PLoS Biol. 5, e243, doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050243 (2007).
Saether, S. A. et al. Sex chromosome-linked species recognition and evolution of reproductive isolation in flycatchers. Science 318, 95–97 (2007).
Haldane, J. B. S. Sex ratio and unisexual sterility in hybrid animals. J. Genet. 12, 101–109 (1922).
Turelli, M. The causes of Haldane’s Rule. Science 282, 889–891 (1998).
Orr, H. A. Haldane’s rule. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28, 195–218 (1997).
Schilthuizen, M., Giesbers, M. C. & Beukeboom, L. W. Haldane’s rule in the 21st century. Heredity 107, 95–102 (2011).
Brothers, A. N. & Delph, L. F. Haldane’s rule is extended to plants with sex chromosomes. Evolution 64, 3643–3648 (2010).
Turelli, M. & Moyle, L. C. Asymmetric postmating isolation: Darwin’s corollary to Haldane’s rule. Genetics 176, 1059–1088 (2007).
Coyne, J. A. & Orr, H. A. Speciation, 545 pp (Sinauer Associates, 2004).
Presgraves, D. C. Sex chromosomes and speciation in Drosophila . Trends Genet. 24, 336–343 (2008).
Qvarnström, A. & Bailey, R. I. Speciation through the evolution of sex-linked genes. Heredity 102, 4–15 (2009).
Lima, T. G. Higher levels of sex chromosome heteromorphism are associated with markedly stronger reproductive isolation. Nat. Commun. 5, 4743, doi: 10.1038/ncomms5743 (2014).
Beukeboom, L. & Perrin, N. The evolution of sex determination, 222pp (Oxford Univ. Press, 2014).
Muller, H. J. In The new systematics (ed Huxley, J. S. ), 185–268 (Clarendon, 1940).
Turelli, M. & Orr, H. A. The dominance theory of Haldane’s rule. Genetics 140, 389–402 (1995).
Parsch, J. & Ellegren, H. The evolutionary causes and consequences of sex-biased gene expression. Nature Reviews Genetics 14, 83–87 (2013).
Wu, C. I. & Davis, A. W. Evolution of postmating reproductive isolation: the composite nature of Haldane’s rule and its genetic bases. Am. Nat. 142, 187–212 (1993).
Wu, C. I., Johnson, N. A. & Palopoli, M. F. Haldane’s Rule and its legacy: why are there so many sterile males. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 281–284 (1996).
Tao, Y. & Hartl, D. L. Genetic dissection of hybrid incompatibilities between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. III. Heterogeneous accumulation of hybrid incompatibilities, degree of dominance, and implications for Haldane’s rule. Evolution 57, 2580–2598 (2003).
McDermott, S. R. & Noor, M. A. F. The role of meiotic drive in hybrid male sterility. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 1265–1272 (2010).
Presgraves, D. C. & Orr, H. A. Haldane’s rule in taxa lacking a hemizygous X. Science 282, 952–954 (1998).
Malone, J. H. & Michalak, P. Physiological sex predicts hybrid sterility regardless of genotype. Science 319, 59 (2008).
Barton, N. H. & Hewitt, G. M. Analysis of hybrid zones. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16, 113–148 (1985).
Abbott, R. et al. Hybridization and speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 26, 229–246 (2013).
Szymura, J. & Barton, N. Genetic analysis of a hybrid zone between the fire-bellied toads, Bombina bombina and Bombina variegata, near Cracow in southern Poland. Evolution 40, 1141–1159 (1986).
Szymura, J. M. Analysis of hybrid zones with Bombina . In Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process (ed. Harrison, R. ), 261–289 (Oxford University Press: New York, 1993).
Hoskin, C. J., Higgie, M., McDonald, K. R. & Moritz, C. Reinforcement drives rapid allopatric speciation. Nature 437, 1353–1356 (2005).
Payseur, B. A., Krenz, J. G. & Nachman, M. W. Differential patterns of introgression across the X chromosome in a hybrid zone between two species of house mice. Evolution 58, 2064–2078 (2004).
Geraldes, A., Ferrand, N. & Nachman, N. W. Contrasting patterns of introgression at X-linked loci across the hybrid zone between subspecies of the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Genetics 173, 919–933 (2006).
Carneiro, M. C. et al. Steep clines within a highly permeable genome across a hybrid zone between two subspecies of the European rabbit. Mol. Ecol. 9, 2511–2525 (2013).
Janoušek, V. et al. Genome-wide architecture of reproductive isolation in a naturally occurring hybrid zone between Mus musculus musculus and M. m. domesticus . Mol. Ecol. 21, 3032–3047 (2012).
Sankararaman, S. The genomic landscape of Neanderthal ancestry in present-day humans. Nature 507, 354–357 (2014).
Saetre, G. P. et al. Sex chromosome evolution and speciation in Ficedula flycatchers. Proc. Biol. Sci. B. 270, 53–59 (2003).
Carling, M. D. & Brumfield, R. T. Haldane’s rule in an avian system: using cline theory and divergence population genetics to test for differential introgression of mitochondrial, autosomal, and sex-linked loci across the Passerina bunting hybrid zone. Evolution 62, 2600–2615 (2008).
Storchova, R., Reif, J. & Nachman, M. W. Female heterogamety and speciation: reduced introgression of the Z chromosome between two species of nightingales. Evolution 64, 456–471 (2010).
Elgvin, T. O. et al. Hybrid speciation in sparrows II: a role for sex chromosomes? Mol. Ecol. 20, 3823–3837 (2011).
Taylor, S. A., Curry, R. L., White, T. A., Ferretti, V. & Lovette, I. Spatiotemporally consistent genomic signatures of reproductive isolation in a moving hybrid zone. Evolution 68, 3066–3081 (2014).
Hagen, R. H. & Scriber, J. M. Sex-linked diapause, color and allozyme loci in Papilio glaucus: Linkage analysis and significance in a hybrid zone. J. Hered. 80, 179–185 (1989).
Herrig, D. K., Modrick, A. J., Brud, E. & Llopart, A. Introgression in the Drosophila subobscura – D. madeirensis sister species: evidence of gene flow in nuclear genes despite mitochondrial differentiation. Evolution 68, 705–719 (2014).
Macholán, M. et al. Genetic conflict outweighs heterogametic incompatibility in the mouse hybrid zone? BMC Evol. Biol. 8, 271, doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-271 (2008).
Stöck, M. et al. Cryptic diversity among Western Palearctic tree frogs: postglacial range expansion, range limits, and secondary contacts of three European tree frog lineages (Hyla arborea group). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 65, 1–9 (2012).
Dufresnes, C. et al. Timeframe of speciation inferred from secondary contact zones in the European tree frog radiation (Hyla arborea group). BMC Evol. Biol. 15, 155, doi: 10.1186/s12862-015-0385-2 (2015).
Stöck, M. et al. Ever-young sex chromosomes in European tree frogs. PLoS Biol. 9, e1001062, doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001062 (2011).
Dufresnes, C. et al. Range wide sex-chromosome sequence similarity supports occasional XY recombination in European tree frogs (Hyla arborea). PLOS One 9, e97959, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097959 (2014).
Dufresnes, C. et al. Sex-chromosome homomorphy in Palearctic tree frogs results from both turnovers and X-Y recombination. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 2328–2337 (2015).
Stöck, M. et al. Maintenance of ancestral sex chromosomes in Palearctic tree frogs: direct evidence from Hyla orientalis . Sex. Dev. 7, 261–266 (2013).
Wysota, W., Molewski, P. & Sokołowski, R. J. Record of the Vistula ice lobe advances in the Late Weichselian glacial sequence in north-central Poland. Quat. Int. 207, 26–41 (2009).
Fitzpatrick, B. M. Alternative forms of genomic clines. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1951–1966 (2013).
Macholan, M. et al. Genetic analysis of autosomal and X-linked markers across a mouse hybrid zone. Evolution 61, 746–771 (2007).
Dufresnes, C. et al. Sex-chromosome differentiation parallels postglacial range expansion in European tree frogs (Hyla arborea). Evolution 68, 3445–3456 (2014).
Broquet, T., Jaquiery, J. & Perrin, N. Opportunity for sexual selection and effective population size in the lek-breeding European treefrog (Hyla arborea). Evolution 63, 674–683 (2009).
Kikuchi, K. & Hamaguchi, S. Novel sex-determining genes in fish and sex chromosome evolution. Dev. Dyn. 242, 339–353 (2013).
Malcom, J. W., Kudra, R. S. & Malone, J. H. The sex chromosomes of frogs: variability and tolerance offer clues to genome evolution and function. J. Genomics 2, 68–76 (2014).
Arntzen, J. W., Jehle, R., Bardakci, F., Burke, T. & Wallis, G. P. Asymmetric viability of reciprocal-cross hybrids between crested and marbled newts (Triturus cristatus and T. marmoratus). Evolution 63, 1191–1202 (2009).
Tech, C. Postzygotic incompatibilities between the pupfishes, Cyprinodon elegans and Cyprinodon variegatus: hybrid male sterility and sex ratio bias. J. Evol. Biol. 19, 1830–1837 (2006).
Russell, S. T. & Magurran, A. E. Intrinsic reproductive isolation between trinidadian populations of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata . J. Evol. Biol. 19, 1294–1303 (2006).
Mendelson, T. C., Imhoff, V. E. & Venditti, J. J. The accumulation of reproductive barriers during speciation: postmating barriers in two behaviorally isolated species of darters (Percidae: Etheostoma). Evolution 61, 2596–2606 (2007).
Crow, K. D. et al. Maintenance of species boundaries despite rampant hybridization between three species of reef fishes (Hexagrammidae): Implications for the role of selection. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 91, 135–147 (2007).
Kitano, J., Mori, S. & Peichel, C. L. Phenotypic divergence and reproductive isolation between sympatric forms of Japanese threespine sticklebacks. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 91, 671–685 (2007).
Malone, J. H., Chrzanowski, T. H. & Michalak, P. Sterility and gene expression in hybrid males of Xenopus laevis and X. muelleri . PLOS One 2, e781, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000781 (2007).
Malone, J. H. & Fontenot, B. E. Patterns of reproductive isolation in toads. PLOS One 3, e3900, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003900 (2008).
Macaya-Sanz, D. et al. Genetic analysis of post-mating reproductive barriers in hybridizing European Populus species. Heredity 107, 478–486 (2011).
Broquet, T., Berset-Brändli, L., Emaresi, G. & Fumagalli, L. Buccal swabs allow efficient and reliable microsatellite genotyping in amphibians. Conserv. Genet. 8, 509–511 (2007).
Dufresnes, C., Brelsford, A. & Perrin, N. First-generation linkage map for the European tree frog (Hyla arborea) with utility in congeneric species. BMC Res. Notes. 7, 850, doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-850 (2014).
Dufresnes, C., Brelsford, A., Béziers, P. & Perrin, N. Stronger transferability but lower variability in transcriptomic- than in anonymous microsatellites: evidence from hylid frogs. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 14, 716–725 (2014).
Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M. & Donnelly, P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155, 945–959 (2000).
Evanno, G., Regnaut S. & Goudet, J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 14, 2611–2620 (2005).
Earl, D. A. & von Holdt, B. M. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 4, 359–361 (2012).
Jakobsson, M. & Rosenberg, N. A. CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. In Bioinformatics 23, 1801–1806 (2007).
Rosenberg, N. A. DISTRUCT: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Mol. Ecol. Notes 4, 137–138 (2004).
Jombart, T. (2008) Adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24, 1403–1405 (2008).
Dufresnes, C. et al. Inferring the degree of incipient speciation in secondary contact zones of closely related lineages of Palearctic green toads (Bufo viridis subgroup). Heredity 113, 9–20 (2014).
Macholán, M. et al. Assessing multilocus introgression patterns: a case study on the mouse X chromosome in central Europe. Evolution 65, 1428–1446 (2011).
We thank Alan Brelsford for making available markers prior to their publication, Bartosz Janic, Aleksandra Kolanek, Agata Margol, Bartłomiej Najbar, Agnieszka Ogrodowczyk, Mariusz Rybacki, and Piotr Zieliński for help during the fieldwork. This paper was supported by a Heisenberg-Fellowship (Sto 493/2–1) of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) to MS and a PhD fellowship from the Faculty of Biology and Medicine of the University of Lausanne to CD. The publication of this article was funded by the Open Access Fund of the Leibniz Association.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Dufresnes, C., Majtyka, T., Baird, S. et al. Empirical evidence for large X-effects in animals with undifferentiated sex chromosomes. Sci Rep 6, 21029 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21029
This article is cited by
Reverse genetics reveals single gene of every candidate on Hybrid sterility, X Chromosome QTL 2 (Hstx2) are dispensable for spermatogenesis
Scientific Reports (2020)
The effect of phylogeographic history on species boundaries: a comparative framework in Hyla tree frogs
Scientific Reports (2020)
Phylogeography of Aegean green toads (Bufo viridis subgroup): continental hybrid swarm vs. insular diversification with discovery of a new island endemic
BMC Evolutionary Biology (2018)
Hybrid sterility increases with genetic distance in snubnose darters (Percidae: Etheostoma)
Environmental Biology of Fishes (2018)
Convergent recombination suppression suggests role of sexual selection in guppy sex chromosome formation
Nature Communications (2017)
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.