Abstract
Strong topological insulators (TIs) support topological surfaces states on any crystal surface. In contrast, a weak, timereversalsymmetrydriven TI with at least one nonzero v_{1}, v_{2}, v_{3} ℤ_{2} index should host spinlocked topological surface states on the surfaces that are not parallel to the crystal plane with Miller indices (v_{1} v_{2} v_{3}). On the other hand, mirror symmetry can protect an even number of topological states on the surfaces that are perpendicular to a mirror plane. Various symmetries in a bulk material with a band inversion can independently preordain distinct crystal planes for realization of topological states. Here we demonstrate the first instance of coexistence of both phenomena in the weak 3D TI Bi_{2}TeI which (v_{1} v_{2} v_{3}) surface hosts a gapless spinsplit surface state protected by the crystal mirrorsymmetry. The observed topological state has an even number of crossing points in the directions of the 2D Brillouin zone due to a nonTRIM bulkband inversion. Our findings shed light on hitherto uncharted features of the electronic structure of weak topological insulators and open up new vistas for applications of these materials in spintronics.
Introduction
The gapless spinpolarized states of topological insulators (TIs) at the edge (in twodimensional (2D) TIs) or at the surface (in threedimensional (3D) TIs) open up exciting possibilities for applications of these materials in spintronics^{1,2,3}. The classification of TIs is based on topological invariants (v_{0}; v_{1} v_{2} v_{3}) and allows to attribute 3D TIs to one of two classes. The v_{0} = 1 identifies strong TIs, which are characterized by metallic surface states forming an odd number of Dirac cones. These states are robust against perturbations that do not break the timereversal symmetry. The nonzero v_{1}, v_{2} and v_{3} indices define (at v_{0} = 0) socalled weak TIs that have an even number of Dirac cones. Spinlocked topological surface states (TSSs) in weak TIs should exist on any crystal surface which is not parallel to the plane with Miller indices (v_{1} v_{2} v_{3})^{4}. The surface states of a weak TI exhibit weaker topological protection than those of a strong TI and can be gapped without breaking the timereversal symmetry^{5}.
In contrast to the extensive studies on strong 3D TIs, only a limited number of accounts on electronic properties of weak TIs is available at present, e.g. honeycomb compounds XYZ (X = K, Na, Li; Y = Hg, Cd/Au, Ag; Z = Sb, As, P/Te, Se)^{6}, a theoretically modelled octahedrondecorated cubic lattice^{7}, PbTe/SnTe superlattices^{8}, Bi_{14}Rh_{3}I_{9} ^{9,10,11}, and Bi_{2}TeI^{12}. With an exception of refs 9,11, the abovementioned papers do not address the (v_{1} v_{2} v_{3}) crystal surface.
Classes of materials with nontrivial band structures are not restricted to TIs. Socalled topological crystalline insulators (TCI) represent another type of topological insulating materials with a band gap inverted by the strong spinorbit coupling (SOC). However, the topological phase therein is protected by a symmetry differing from the timereversal symmetry, namely by the crystal mirror symmetry^{13,14}. Consequently, these materials possess topologically protected surface states on the surfaces that are perpendicular to the mirror plane.
It was established that the majority of known strong TIs, like Bi_{2}Te_{3} with the trigonal crystal structure, also accommodate a TCI phase and, thus, the Dirac state residing on the (111) surface is simultaneously protected by both the timereversal and the crystal mirror symmetries. A magnetic field applied perpendicular to the mirror plane in Bi_{2}Te_{3} destroys the topological phase and, hence, unravels the dual topological nature of the Dirac state since the TCI phase is preserved and the Dirac surface state remains gapless^{15}.
From this viewpoint, weak TIs are perspective for realization of a dual topological phase where the Dirac surface state of the topological phase and the topological states protected by the crystal symmetry can be manipulated separately without applying a magnetic field, owing to the fact that they appear at different crystal surfaces. In the following, we show that the weak 3D TI Bi_{2}TeI is a promising candidate.
This chemically stable crystalline compound is built by a periodic stack of two types of 2D fragments: BiTeI trilayers and Bibilayer^{16}. Previously it was theoretically predicted that Bi_{2}TeI is a weak TI characterized by the (0; 0, 0, 1) invariant^{12}. Accordingly, calculations of the electronic structure of the (010) surface, which is not a natural cleavage surface of the compound, revealed TSS inside the bulk gap^{12}.
Herewith we present an abinitio densityfunctionaltheory study of the electronic structure of the Bi_{2}TeI natural cleavage (001) surface with different types of possible terminations. By means of these simulations we demonstrate for the first time that the (v_{1} v_{2} v_{3}) surface of a weak 3D TI can accommodate a gapless spinsplit surface state in the band gap. The preferable Te termination holds topological surface state, which oppositespin branches cross at nonsymmetric points of the 2D Brilloin zone (BZ) lying in the directions (≈0.3 ) where they are protected by mirror symmetry of the system of the system. Away from the mirror plane a tiny gap of ≈8 meV opens up since the crossing is avoided by a symmetry constraint. On the contrary, the iodine and [Bi_{2}]terminated surfaces of Bi_{2}TeI exhibit Rashbalike spinsplit bands in the BZ center in addition to an even number of gapless TSSs.
Results
The crystal structure of Bi_{2}TeI was elucidated from a singlecrystal Xray diffraction experiment^{16}. The compound crystallizes in a centrosymmetric monoclinic unit cell (space group C12/m1, a = 7.586 Å, b = 4.380 Å, c = 17.741 Å, β = 98.20°) with 16 atoms which can be represented as a Nigglireduced cell (a = b = 4.380 Å, c = 17.741 Å, α = β = 82.9047°, γ = 60.0025°) with 8 atoms [Fig. 1(a)]. We performed crystal growth experiments based on the synthetic protocol from^{16} and determined that the stacking sequence of layers and the lattice parameters are in agreement with the earlier reported results.
The layered Bi_{2}TeI structure comprises two 2D building blocks relevant for TI studies: the Bibilayer, [Bi_{2}], which is theoretically predicted to be a 2D TI^{17,18}, and BiTeI trilayer, which is a structural unit of the BiTeI compound with giant Rashbalike spin splitting^{19,20,21,22,23,24}. The BiTeI compound can be tuned into a TI phase by external pressure^{25}. Moreover, a single BiTeI trilayer holds the giant Rashba state itself^{26}. These two types of fragments alternate in the stack in such a manner that the Bibilayers are always inserted between iodine atomic layers forming [TeBiI] · [Bi_{2}] · [IBiTe] sandwiches. In contrast to covalent bonding within the [Bi_{2}] and the [IBiTe] fragments, the sandwiches are held together by significantly weaker vanderWaals interactions. As a result, the natural cleavage surface for Bi_{2}TeI is perpendicular to the (001) direction, and this ensures absence of trivial surface states within the bulk band gap. The material can be easily cleaved with scotch tape into thin flakes with three possible terminations: tellurium or iodine planes of the [TeBiI] block, or bismuth bilayers. Our experimental results on cleavage show that the Te termination is predominant (more than 80% of instances). Furthermore, we estimated energies for the TeTe and the Bi_{2}I cleavages and found that the cleavage between adjacent [TeBiI] · [Bi_{2}] · [IBiTe] sandwiches, is ≈50 times more favorable than that between the [Bi_{2}] and the [IBiTe] fragments, which is consistent with the experimentally found preference for the Te termination.
Stacked layers in the periodic Bi_{2}TeI structure are slightly shifted with respect to each other in the ab plane (this shift amounts to ca. 0.001 Å only within the unit cell). This forces the reduction of the trigonal point symmetry of the [Bi_{2}] and [IBiTe] building blocks, respectively, down to the monoclinic symmetry of the entire Bi_{2}TeI crystal lattice. As a result, the BZ of the (001) surface is a slightly distorted hexagon with the base angles equal to 120.005 and 119.995 degrees, respectively. For this reason, the crystal structure can be regarded as a pseudohexagonal one in which only one mirror plane, , is retained, whereas the other two mirror planes of the hexagonal lattice are transformed into pseudomirror planes ( and ), see Fig. 1(b). Below the influence of this small distortion from the trigonal symmetry on the electronic structure is discussed.
Spinorbit interaction (SOC) plays a crucial role in this material. The electronic spectrum of Bi_{2}TeI without SOC included (Fig. 1(d)) has semimetallic character with a zero gap at the Z point. Switching on SOC transforms the electronic spectrum of Bi_{2}TeI from a semimetallic to an insulating one (Fig. 1(e)). Our calculation of the , determined from the product of the parity eigenvalues of the occupied states at the timereversal invariant momenta (TRIM), confirms the (0; 0, 0, 1) indices obtained by Tang et al.^{12}. However, the SOCinduced band inversion is more complicated in this case than in conventional TIs, like Bi_{2}Te_{3}. In the latter, SOC lifts up the Kramers degeneracy in a valencebandedge state (formed by Te porbitals) and a conductionbandedge state (formed by Bi porbitals) at the TRIM. Since the strength of SOC is larger than the gap width, it leads to an inversion of the edge bands and formation of a new insulating gap owing to their hybridization (see a schematic picture in Fig. 1(g)). As can be seen from Fig. 1(d,e), the SOCinduced band inversion for the Bi_{2}TeI cannot be easily described in terms of atomic orbitals. Nevertheless, if one combines the orbitals that belong to different blocks (Fig. 1(f)) it can be deduced, firstly, that the bulkband inversion in Bi_{2}TeI occurs between the states of the [Bi_{2}] and the [BiTeI] structural blocks, and, secondly, that two pairs of bands contribute to the SOCinduced band inversion in the resulting spectrum (shown schematically in Fig. 1(h)), in contrast to conventional TIs. The consequence of such complicated band inversion is that the bandgapinversion area is not centered at the TRIM (see the indicated area I in Fig. 1(h)), as in the case of conventional TI. Furthermore, it triggers formation of additional hybridization gaps between the inverted bands in the valence and conduction bands (areas II and III, respectively). Based on these premises, emergence of a bandgap topological surface state at nonsymmetric points as well as the valence and conductionband TSSs can be expected.
Simulations of the preferable Teterminated surface were performed on a slab composed of four [TeBiI] · [Bi_{2}] · [IBiTe] sandwiches, i. e. of 32 atomic layers. Figure 2(a) shows the surface bandstructure calculated without inclusion of SOC. This spectrum exhibits semimetallic character, so that the valence and conduction bands touch only at the point and no surface states exist, as can be expected for a surface formed by cleavage through a vanderWaals gap. The surface spectrum with included SOC (Fig. 2(b)) features a spinpolarized TSS that crosses the band gap along the and directions. Besides, additional spinsplit TSSs arise in the valence and conduction bands. They are marked by violet circles II and III, respectively, in Fig. 2(b). Henceforward we focus solely on the bandgap TSS. This state is gapless with a crossing point (CP) lying at ≈0.3 near the conduction band, whereas in the direction it has a tiny gap of 8 meV (Fig. 2(b)). Noteworthy is that the TSS comprises two degenerate states, one for each slab surface. For the considered slab thickness these states are slightly coupled, introducing an artificial minigap (of 2 meV) in the crossing point along the direction. The doubling of the slab in the z direction halves the size of this minigap, whereas the gap in TSS along the remains unchanged. Moreover, identical minigaps are also found in the and directions, thus leading to a conclusion that slight deviations from the trigonal structure in the title compound affect the energy spectrum even weaker than artifacts of the slab model. From these finding we can infer that the crystalsymmetry protection is tolerant (at least for the slab geometry) toward small structural distortions.
Energy dependence of the TSS in the full 2D BZ shows that the spin branches with opposite spins form two continuous surfaces with different spatial localization around the center of the BZ (see Fig. 2(c)). One surface (highlighted in yellow) is strongly localized in the outer [TeBiI] trilayer, while the other one (in green) is localized in both [TeBiI] and adjacent [Bi_{2}] blocks (see Fig. 2(d)). There is a tiny gap at the intersection of these two branches at all away of the mirrorplanes, where the crossing is avoided by a symmetry constraint^{27}. The TSS remains gapless only in six CPs lying along the directions (marked by black dots in Fig. 2(c)), where it is protected by the crystal mirror symmetry.
The 2D Fermi Surface (FS) is composed of two Γcentered contours (Fig. 2(e)) for various positions of the chemical potential within the entire bulk band gap. While the inner contour is almost circular, the outer one is subject to strong hexagonal warping. The inner branch of the TSS exhibits clockwise spinrotation with a negligible outofplane spin component, whereas the outer, hexagonally warped branch demonstrates generally counterclockwise helicity with a more complex spintexture.
Let us consider the evolution of the 2D FS topology of the TSS at the energies above the conduction band minimum. Right above E = 0, where the TSS has a tiny gap in the directions (see cut 1 in Fig. 2(b,f)), two centered contours transform into six pockets. At higher energies (cut 2 in Fig. 2(b,g)), the tiny TSS gap shifts away from the point on the highsymmetry direction which initiates further transformations in the FS from six to twelve pockets. Each pocket is centered at the points residing in highsymmetry directions. At E = E_{CP} (cut 3 in Fig. 2(b,h)) the FS again evolves into two distinct centered contours so that the inner, camomilelike contour touches the outer one at the points lying along the directions. Further shift of the chemical potential towards higher energies (cut 4 in Fig. 2(b,i)) leads to contraction(expansion) of the inner(outer) FS contour.
Let us now regard the less frequent iodineterminated surface of Bi_{2}TeI. This case was approximated as an [IBiTe] overlayer on top of the Teterminated slab, so we consider mainly the changes that this addon introduces in the electronic structure of the Teterminated surface. The surface spectrum calculated without taking spinorbit coupling into account (see Fig. 3(a)) is generally similar to the Teterminated surface spectrum (see Fig. 2(a)) with an exception of a surface state residing at the point at ≈0.2 eV in a local gap of the conduction band (marked by a deep pink curve). This state originates from the splitting of the upper edge of the first conduction band which is caused by positive band bending that is provided by the [IBiTe] overlayer. This case bears similarity to the effects introduced by the iodineterminated surface in the BiTeI compound^{21}.
The switchedon SOC provokes significant modification of the surface electronic structure as compared to the case of the Teterminated surface. First of all, SOC induces the bulkband inversion, so that the bulk conduction band, from which the surface state is split off, dives into the valence band and, consequently, a trivial surface state emerges in the band gap (Fig. 3(b)). In spite of this modification the trivial surface state maintains its localization within the surface trilayers with a maximum in the outer trilayer (Fig. 3(c), deep pink and black curves in the outmost right panel) regardless of whether SOC is taken into account or not. Another consequence of the activated SOC is emergence of a Rashbatype spin splitting at small for the trivial surface state at . At larger the splitting acquires a more complicated character owing to hybridization of the trivial surface state with the topological one. This hybridization also substantially modifies the gapless spinhelical topological surface state which survives at , although the energy of the CP noticeably lowers (with respect to its position at the Teterminated surface) and approaches the bulk valence band (Fig. 3(b)). As far as localization of the TSS is concerned, the spatial distribution profiles for the opposite spin branches (Fig. 3(c), yellow and green curves) resemble those at the Teterminated surface (Fig. 2(e)) with the difference that now they penetrate considerably into the [IBiTe] overlayer.
Strong alternation of the electronic spectrum of the Bi_{2}TeI surface induced by the [IBiTe] overlayer causes substantial changes in the 2D Fermi surface. In contrast to two centered contours provided by the topological surface state (Fig. 2(f)), it is now formed by six isolated eggshaped pockets enclosing the TSS degeneracies plus two concentric contours from the Rashbalike trivial surface state (RS) in the vicinity of (see Fig. 3(d)).
The last possible cleavage surface of Bi_{2}TeI is terminated by the Bibilayer and can be approximated as a [Bi_{2}] · [IBiTe] overlayer on top of the Teterminated surface or, alternatively, as a [Bi_{2}] overlayer on top of the iodineterminated surface.
First, the electronic structure of a freestanding [Bi_{2}] · [IBiTe] overlayer is addressed. As can be seen from Fig. 4(a), its spectrum has a gap at the point with a valenceband Rashbasplit state at the Fermi level that is mostly localized in the [Bi_{2}]block in the vicinity of the point, while away from this point the [IBiTe] trilayer contributes predominantly to this state.
The Rashbalike state formed by the [Bi_{2}] · [IBiTe] overlayer at the Fermi level is retrieved as the most prominent feature in the surface spectrum of the Bi_{2}terminated Bi_{2}TeI. Comparison of the spectra of a freestanding [Bi_{2}] · [IBiTe] overlayer and the Bi_{2}terminated surface shows that the dispersion and spatial localization of the discussed state do not change (Fig. 4(d), left) as it remains localized in the [Bi_{2}] block. The major difference is, however, that the spectrum is gapless in the case of the Bi_{2}terminated surface (see a light blue rectangle in Fig. 4(b)). This state with the CP at ≈0.25 (Fig. 4(c)) below the conduction band can be regarded as the survived topological state which penetrated deeply into the adjacent sublayers down to a second trilayer (Fig. 4(d), right). The spin texture of this state is highly unusual because of the strong hybridization with the trivial Rashba state (Fig. 4(e)), namely, the spin, being mostly inplane, always has a positive S_{x} component around the contour. The counterpart gapless state located in the direction has an opposite spin direction and, thus, the net spin equals zero over the Brillouin zone.
Methods
Crystal growth
A stoichiometric mixture of Bi, Te and BiI_{3} (sublimated in vacuum prior to use) was placed into a silica ampoule that was then evacuated and sealed. The ampoule was heated to 823 K with a rate of 10 K/h, tempered for 2 hours and subsequently cooled down to ambient temperature with a rate 2 K/h. Largely overgrown crystalline platelets were found on the batch along with some single crystals that grew on the ampoule’s walls. The products were characterized by semiquantitative energy dispersive Xray analysis (SU8020 (Hitachi) SEM, Silicon Drift Detector (SDD) X − Max^{N} (Oxford)), Xray diffractometry (X’Pert Pro MPD diffractometer (PANalytical), Ge(111) monochromator, CuK_{α} radiation) and TEM methods (FEI Titan F20 microscope with CScorrection operating at 80 kV). A typical SAED and HRTEM images for Bi_{2}TeI are given in Fig. 1(c) of the main text. The observed stacking sequence of layers and lattice parameters are in consistent with the those determined from the structure elucidation in ref. 16.
DFT calculations
Electronic structure calculations were carried out within the density functional theory using the projector augmentedwave method^{28} as implemented in the VASP code^{29,30} and ABINIT code^{31}. The PAW data sets in ABINIT code were taken from ref. 32. The exchangecorrelation energy was treated using the generalized gradient approximation^{33}. The Hamiltonian contained the scalar relativistic corrections and the spinorbit coupling was taken into account. The calculation of invariant was carried by using the parity of the wave functions obtained in the framework of the Full Potential Linearized Augmented Plane wave (FLAPW) method implemented in FLEUR code^{34}. The bulk and surface spectra obtained using different codes are in full agreement.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Rusinov, I. P. et al. Mirrorsymmetry protected nonTRIM surface state in the weak topological insulator Bi_{2}TeI. Sci. Rep. 6, 20734; doi: 10.1038/srep20734 (2016).
References
 1.
Hasan, M. Z. & Kane, C. L. Colloquium: Topological insulators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045–3067 (2010).
 2.
Qi, X.L. & Zhang, S.C. Topological insulators and superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057–1110 (2011).
 3.
Vobornik, I. et al. Magnetic proximity effect as a pathway to spintronic applications of topological insulators. Nano Lett. 11, 4079–4082 (2011).
 4.
Fu, L. & Kane, C. L. Topological insulators with inversion symmetry. Phys. Rev. B 76, 045302 (2007).
 5.
Liu, C.X., Qi, X.L. & Zhang, S.C. Half quantum spin Hall effect on the surface of weak topological insulators. Physica E: Lowdimensional Systems and Nanostructures 44, 906–911 (2012).
 6.
Yan, B., Müchler, L. & Felser, C. Prediction of weak topological insulators in layered semiconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 116406 (2012).
 7.
Hou, J.M., Zhang, W.X. & Wang, G.X. Threedimensional topological insulators in the octahedrondecorated cubic lattice. Phys. Rev. B 84, 075105 (2011).
 8.
Yang, G., Liu, J., Fu, L., Duan, W. & Liu, C. Weak topological insulators in PbTe/SnTe superlattices. Phys. Rev. B 89, 085312 (2014).
 9.
Rasche, B. et al. Stacked topological insulator built from bismuthbased graphene sheet analogues. Nat. Mater. 12, 422–425 (2013).
 10.
Rasche, B. et al. Crystal growth and real structure effects of the first weak 3d stacked topological insulator Bi_{14}Rh_{3}I_{9}. Chem. Mater. 25, 2359–2364 (2013).
 11.
Pauly, C. et al. Subnanometrewide electron channels protected by topology. Nat. Phys. 11, 338–343 Letter (2015).
 12.
Tang, P. et al. Weak topological insulators induced by the interlayer coupling: A firstprinciples study of stacked Bi_{2}TeI. Phys. Rev. B 89, 041409 (2014).
 13.
Fu, L. Topological crystalline insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 106802 (2011).
 14.
Ando, Y. & Fu, L. Topological crystallinge insulators and topological superconductors: From concepts to materials. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 361–381 (2015).
 15.
Rauch, T., Flieger, M., Henk, J., Mertig, I. & Ernst, A. Dual topological character of chalcogenides: Theory for Bi_{2}Te_{3}. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 016802 (2014).
 16.
Savilov, S. V., Khrustalev, V. N., Kuznetsov, A. N., Popovkin, B. A. & Antipin, M. Y. New subvalent bismuth telluroiodides incorporating Bi_{2} layers: the crystal and electronic structure of Bi_{2}TeI. Russ. Chem. Bull., Int. Ed. 54, 87–92 (2005).
 17.
Murakami, S. Quantum spin Hall effect and enhanced magnetic response by spinorbit coupling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 236805 (2006).
 18.
Wada, M., Murakami, S., Freimuth, F. & Bihlmayer, G. Localized edge states in twodimensional topological insulators: Ultrathin Bi films. Phys. Rev. B 83, 121310 (2011).
 19.
Ishizaka, K. et al. Giant Rashbatype spin splitting in bulk BiTeI. Nat. Mater. 10, 521–526 (2011).
 20.
Sakano, M. et al. Strongly spinorbit coupled twodimensional electron gas emerging near the surface of polar semiconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 107204 (2013).
 21.
Eremeev, S. V., Nechaev, I. A., Koroteev, Y. M., Echenique, P. M. & Chulkov, E. V. Ideal twodimensional electron systems with a giant Rashbatype spin splitting in real materials: surfaces of bismuth tellurohalides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 246802 (2012).
 22.
Eremeev, S. V., Nechaev, I. A. & Chulkov, E. V. Giant Rashbatype spin splitting at polar surfaces of BiTeI. JETP Lett. 96, 437–444 (2012).
 23.
Crepaldi, A. et al. Giant ambipolar Rashba effect in the semiconductor BiTeI. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 096803 (2012).
 24.
Landolt, G. et al. Disentanglement of surface and bulk rashba spin splittings in noncentrosymmetric BiTeI. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 116403 (2012).
 25.
Bahramy, M., Yang, B.J., Arita, R. & Nagaosa, N. Emergence of noncentrosymmetric topological insulating phase in BiTeI under pressure. Nat. Commun. 3, 679 (2012).
 26.
Eremeev, S. V., Tsirkin, S. S., Nechaev, I. A., Echenique, P. M. & Chulkov, E. V. New generation of twodimensional spintronic systems realized by coupling of Rashba and Dirac fermions. Sci. Rep. 5, 12819 (2015).
 27.
Weber, A. P. et al. Gapped surface states in a strongtopologicalinsulator material. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 256401 (2015).
 28.
Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmentedwave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).
 29.
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio totalenergy calculations using a planewave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).
 30.
Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmentedwave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).
 31.
Gonze, X. et al. Abinit: Firstprinciples approach to material and nanosystem properties. Computer Physics Communications 180, 2582– 2615 (2009).
 32.
Jollet, F., Torrent, M. & Holzwarth, N. Generation of projector augmentedwave atomic data: a 71 element validated table in the xml format. Comp. Physics Comm. 185, 1246–1254 (2014).
 33.
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).
 34.
URL: http://www.flapw.de.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by grant (No 8.1.05.2015) from the Tomsk State University Academic D.I. Mendeleev Fund Program and the St. Petersburg State University (project no. 11.50.202.2015). Calculations were performed on the SKIFCyberia supercomputer of Tomsk State University. A. I. acknowledges the Priority Program 1666 “Topological Insulators” of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, grant No. IS 250/11) and is grateful to M. Richter and K. Koepernik (IFW Dresden) for fruitful discussions, to U. Kaiser and C. T. Koch (Ulm University) for providing beam time for the TEM characterization, to E. Schmid (Ulm University) for ultramicrotomy.
Author information
Affiliations
Tomsk State University, pr. Lenina, 36, Tomsk, 634050 Russia
 I. P. Rusinov
 , T. V. Menshchikova
 , S. V. Eremeev
 , Yu. M. Koroteev
 & E. V. Chulkov
St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya nab., 7/9, St. Petersburg, 199034 Russia
 I. P. Rusinov
 , S. V. Eremeev
 & E. V. Chulkov
Technische Universität Dresden, Bergstraße, 66, Dresden, D01069, Germany
 A. Isaeva
Institute of Strength Physics and Materials Science, pr. Akademicheskiy, 2/4, Tomsk, 634021 Russia
 S. V. Eremeev
 & Yu. M. Koroteev
Donostia International Physics Center (DIPC), Paseo de Manuel Lardizabal, 4, 20018 San Sebastián/Donostia, Basque Country, Spain
 M. G. Vergniory
 , P. M. Echenique
 & E. V. Chulkov
Departamento de Física de Materiales, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, UPV/EHU, 20080 San Sebastián/Donostia, Basque Country, Spain
 P. M. Echenique
 & E. V. Chulkov
Centro de Física de Materiales CFM–MPC, Centro Mixto CSIC–UPV/EHU, 20080 San Sebastián/Donostia, Basque Country, Spain
 P. M. Echenique
 & E. V. Chulkov
Authors
Search for I. P. Rusinov in:
Search for T. V. Menshchikova in:
Search for A. Isaeva in:
Search for S. V. Eremeev in:
Search for Yu. M. Koroteev in:
Search for M. G. Vergniory in:
Search for P. M. Echenique in:
Search for E. V. Chulkov in:
Contributions
The calculations were performed mainly by I.P.R., T.V.M. and S.V.E. with contributions by Y.M.K. and M.G.V. Experiments were performed by A.I. The idea of the study was proposed by E.V.C., who is the supervisor of the project, A.I. and P.M.E. All authors contributed to discussion, data analysis. I.P.R., T.V.M., S.V.E., A.I. and E.V.C. wrote the manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to I. P. Rusinov.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Further reading

Transport properties of topologically nontrivial bismuth tellurobromides BinTeBr
Journal of Applied Physics (2019)

Two and onedimensional quantum spin Hall states in stanenefunctionalized GaTe and InTe matrices
Journal of Materials Chemistry C (2019)

Band structure engineering in 3D topological insulators
Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter (2019)

Dual topology in jacutingaite Pt2HgSe3
Physical Review Materials (2019)

Synthesis, Crystal and Topological Electronic Structures of New Bismuth Tellurohalides Bi2TeBr and Bi3TeBr
Chemistry of Materials (2018)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.