Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Low lattice thermal conductivity of stanene

Abstract

A fundamental understanding of phonon transport in stanene is crucial to predict the thermal performance in potential stanene-based devices. By combining first-principle calculation and phonon Boltzmann transport equation, we obtain the lattice thermal conductivity of stanene. A much lower thermal conductivity (11.6 W/mK) is observed in stanene, which indicates higher thermoelectric efficiency over other 2D materials. The contributions of acoustic and optical phonons to the lattice thermal conductivity are evaluated. Detailed analysis of phase space for three-phonon processes shows that phonon scattering channels LA + LA/TA/ZA ↔ TA/ZA are restricted, leading to the dominant contributions of high-group-velocity LA phonons to the thermal conductivity. The size dependence of thermal conductivity is investigated as well for the purpose of the design of thermoelectric nanostructures.

Introduction

Research in 2D materials has experienced an explosion of interest due to their potential for integration into next-generation electronic and energy conversion devices1,2,3,4. Recently, a new 2D material, stanene, has been realized on the Bi2Te3 (111) substrate by molecular beam epitaxy5 and attracted tremendous interest due to its extraordinary properties. Stanene, a monolayer of tin film with buckled honeycomb structure like silicene, is predicted to be an example of a topological insulator, which can support a large-gap 2D quantum spin Hall (QSH) state6,7,8,9. It has been reported that a nontrivial bulk gap of ~0.1 eV opens when the spin-orbital coupling (SOC) is present in stanene and the edge states are gapless with bands dispersing inside the bulk gap and helical with spin-momentum locking, which can be used as dissipationless conducting “wires” for electronic circuits7,9. The free standing stanene with ~0.1 eV SOC gap is a promising applicant for room temperature and even high temperature application. In addition, a recent study has found that the thermoelectric (TE) figure of merit zT is strongly size dependent in stanene and can be improved to be significantly larger than 1 by optimizing the geometric size, which provides great opportunities in the next-generation TE devices10.

All these electrical and thermoelectrical applications of stanene are closely related to its thermal transport properties. For instance, high TE performance requires the system to be a bad conductor for phonons but a good conductor for electrons, which often conflict with each other11,12. In 2D QSH systems such as stanene, the edge states form perfectly conducting channels for electrons, leading to great improvement in the TE figure of merit zT10,13,14. Moreover, zT of stanene can be further improved by optimizing the geometry size to maximize the contribution of the gapless edge states, which significantly helps to optimize the electron transport. However, the phonon transport properties of stanene have not been investigated in detail. Furthermore, although the size dependence of zT and the Seebeck coefficient in stanene has been studied for TE applications, the size dependence of lattice thermal conductivity, which is also crucial when designing TE nanostructures, remains uninvestigated.

Generally both electrons and phonons contribute to the total thermal conductivity. In this paper only the lattice thermal conductivity of stanene is under consideration. We calculate the lattice thermal conductivity κ of stanene using first-principle calculation and an iterative solution of the Boltzmann transport equation (BTE) for phonons15. A much lower thermal conductivity (11.6 W/mK) is observed in stanene compared to other 2D materials, which makes stanene a promising candidate to realize high thermoelectric performance. We also extract the contribution of each phonon mode to investigate the underlying mechanism behind the novel thermal transport properties of stanene and find that LA phonons contribute most to the thermal conductivity (>57%) over a wide temperature range. It can be attributed to their high phonon group velocities and restricted phase space for three-phonon processes. Finally, we obtain the representative mean free path (MFP) of stanene that is useful when designing TE nanostructures. The MFP in the small-grain limit is also obtained when the nanostructuring induced phonon scattering dominates. The role of boundary scattering in stanene nanowires is examined as well.

Results and Discussions

Crystal structure and phonon dispersion

Figure 1 shows the optimized structure of stanene. A similar low-buckled configuration is also found in silicene, germanene and blue phosphorene6,7,8,16,17, which is different from the planar geometry of graphene18. The optimized lattice constant and buckling height are 4.67 Å and 0.85 Å, respectively, which are in good agreement with the previous work6,7,9. There are two tin atoms in one unit cell, corresponding to three acoustic and three optical phonon branches.

Figure 1
figure1

(a) Top view and (b) side view of stanene.

Figure 2 shows the calculated phonon dispersion. Similar to α-Sn and β-Sn19, the longitudinal acoustic (LA), transverse acoustic (TA) and z-direction acoustic (ZA) branches of stanene are linear near the Γ point, which is distinctly different from the quadratic ZA-branch dispersion in graphene20. This difference between graphene and stanene comes from structural difference. In planar graphene, the quadratic ZA-branch dispersion near the Γ point can be explained as the consequence of the complete decoupling of the Z modes and XY modes due to the D6h point-group symmetry21,22. However, the buckled structure of stanene leads to the point group symmetry of D3d, which breaks the reflection symmetry (z → −z) and therefore the Z modes of stanene couple with the XY modes23, which results in the linear dispersion of ZA phonons near the Γ point.

Figure 2
figure2

Phonon dispersion and DOS of stanene.

Three acoustic and three optical phonon modes are indicated with different colors.

Using the phonon spectrum, we calculate the group velocities of acoustic phonons along Γ-M and Γ-K respectively, as shown in Fig. 3(a,b). The anisotropy in group velocities along the two directions is weaker than that of black phosphorene and SnSe24,25. As shown in Fig. 3(c), the phonon group velocities indicate weak anisotropy within the entire first Brillouin zone (BZ). Much smaller sound velocities are found in stanene (1300–3600 m/s compared to 5,400–8,800 m/s in silicene26, 4200–6,800 m/s in MoS227, 4,000–8,000 m/s in blue phosphorene17 and 3,700–6,000 m/s in graphene28). For LA, TA and ZA phonons, the sound velocities at long-wavelength limit are about 3548.7 m/s, 1811.4 m/s and 1303.7–1536.8 m/s, respectively.

Figure 3
figure3

Phonon group velocities along the (a) Γ-M and (b) Γ-K direction and (c) within the first BZ.

The Grüneisen parameter, which provides information on the anharmonic interactions, is given by

where a0 is the equilibrium lattice constant, j is phonon branch index and q is wave vector. Figure 4 shows the Grüneisen parameters within the first BZ. Strong anisotropy is found in the Grüneisen parameters of TA phonons at high frequencies, while the isotropy in the Grüneisen parameters of LA and TA phonons at low frequencies indicates that the anharmonicity of these phonons is similar from one phonon wave vector to another. The low-frequency phonons contribute most to the lattice thermal conductivity of stanene due to their higher group velocities and weaker scattering. Therefore, the orientation-independent phonon group velocities and Grüneisen parameters at low frequencies are crucial to understand the phonon transport in stanene.

Figure 4
figure4

Calculated Grüneisen parameters within the first BZ.

Lattice thermal conductivity

The intrinsic lattice thermal conductivity κ of naturally occurring stanene is calculated using both the iterative and single-mode relaxation time approximation (SMA) solution, as shown in Fig. 5. In contrast to the anisotropy of thermal conductivity observed in black phosphorene and SnSe24,25,29, which possess the hinge-like structure, the isotropic κ is found in stanene, which is similar to other 2D hexagonal materials with C3 symmetry such as silicene, blue phosphorene, graphene and monolayer MoS217,30,31,32,33,34.

Figure 5
figure5

Calculated lattice thermal conductivity κ of stanene as a function of temperature ranging from 100 K to 800 K using the iterative (red) and SMA (blue) solution of the BTE.

The inverse relationship of κ and temperature (κ ~ 1/T) is displayed as dot lines.

The thermal conductivity from the iterative solution at 300 K is 11.6 W/mK and 11.9 W/mK for naturally occurring and isotopically pure stanene respectively. Naturally occurring Sn consists of 0.97% 112Sn, 0.65% 114Sn, 0.36% 115Sn, 14.7% 116Sn, 7.7% 117Sn, 24.3% 118Sn, 8.6% 119Sn, 32.4% 120Sn, 4.6% 122Sn and 5.6% 124Sn.

The measured room-temperature κ of 500-nm-thick tin film is 46 ± 4.2 W/mK while for the thickness of 100 nm, κ is 36 ± 2.88 W/mK35, which are lower than the room-temperature κ of bulk tin, 64 W/mK. Note that when the thickness of the Sn thin film decreases, phonons become more sensitive to boundary scattering35, which further reduces the value of κ. Thus a smaller calculated κ for stanene is a reasonable expectation. The Debye temperature ΘD can be calculated from the highest frequency of normal mode vibration (Debye frequency) vm = 1.51 THz,

where h is the Planck constant and kB is the Boltzmann constant. The calculated Debye temperature is 72.5 K, which is nearly three times lower than that of β-Sn of 200 ± 3 K36. Since the Debye temperature is a measure of the temperature above which all modes begin to be excited and below which modes begin to be frozen out33,37, this low ΘD in stanene also indicates that the κ of stanene is much lower than that of bulk tin.

According to the kinetic formula for the thermal conductivity of an assembly of total specific heat C, average phonon velocity v and MFP l, i.e. κ = 1/3Cvl, when the temperature is well above the Debye temperature ΘD, the C is constant, while the dominant three-phonon anharmonic processes at high temperatures lead to l 1/T38,39. We fit the calculated κ above ΘD, which reveals an inverse relation to temperature, i.e. κ ~ 1/T. As shown in Fig. 5, the fitted κ (plotted as dot lines) coincides perfectly with the calculated κ. Such inverse relationship of κ and T is also found in other materials such as graphene, black phosphorene, PbSe and Mg2 (Si, Sn) when T > ΘD24,40,41,42. Furthermore, we compare the thermal conductivity calculated from the iterative and SMA solution. The difference between the two approaches is very small. It should be noticed that the SMA assumes that individual phonons are excited independently, which has no memory of the initial phonon distribution, therefore the SMA is inadequate to describe the momentum-conserving character of the Normal processes and it works well only if the Umklapp processes dominate43. Our results indicate the dominant role of the Umklapp processes in phonon-phonon interactions over a wide temperature range.

Compared to other 2D hexagonal materials, the κ of stanene is smaller than that of silicene (26 W/mK)30, monolayer MoS2 (34.5 ± 4 W/mK)33,44 and blue phosphorene (78 W/mK)17, while at least two orders of magnitude smaller than that of graphene (3000 W/mK)30,31. The lower κ of stanene is due to lower Debye temperature (72.5 K compared to 500 K for monolayer MoS2 and blue phosphorene17,45 and 2,300 K for graphene46). The Debye temperature reflects the magnitude of sound velocity. Lower Debye temperature results in decreased phonon velocities as mentioned above and higher phonon scattering rates since more phonon modes are active at a given temperature33,37,47.

High TE performance requires the system to be a bad conductor for phonons and a good conductor for electrons. As a 2D topological insulator with lower lattice thermal conductivity, stanene can realize much higher thermoelectric efficiency than other 2D materials, which makes it a promising candidate for next-generation thermoelectric devices.

Furthermore, we examine the contributions of different phonon branches to κ of stanene, as shown in Fig. 6. The contribution of LA phonons is more than 57% at temperatures ranging from 100 K to 800 K, which is larger than 28% in MoS232, 26% in blue phosphorene17 and 8% in graphene48. The contribution of ZA phonons to the κ of stanene (13%) is much smaller than that of graphene (80%)30, blue phosphorene (44%)17 and monolayer MoS2 (39%)32, but larger than silicene (7.5%)30. It has been reported that the large contribution of the ZA mode to the κ of graphene is due to a symmetry selection rule in one-atom-thick materials, which strongly restricts anharmonic phonon-phonon scattering of the ZA mode40, while the buckled structure of stanene, silicene and blue phosphorene breaks out the out-of-plane symmetry, in which the selection rule does not apply. As a result, the predicted contribution of ZA phonons to κ in stanene is much smaller than that in graphene at 300 K. To provide more physical insight, we investigate the phonon scattering mechanism in detail.

Figure 6
figure6

Percentage contribution of each phonon mode to κ as a function of temperature.

Relaxation time and phase space for three-phonon processes

Considering the significant difference in the contribution of acoustic phonon modes to the κ in stanene and other 2D hexagonal materials, it is worthwhile to investigate the relaxation time of each phonon mode as a function of frequency, as shown in Fig. 7. In Fig. 7(a), the three-phonon relaxation time of LA mode is the longest and the relaxation time of the optical phonons is much shorter than the acoustic phonons. We also calculate the isotopic relaxation time, as shown in Fig. 7(b). Isotopic scattering processes are wavelength-dependent. The long-wavelength phonons can transport all the heat with very little isotopic scattering49, thus we observe the relative long isotopic relaxation time of acoustic phonons at low frequencies. The inverse of total relaxation time is a sum of contributions from anharmonic three-phonon scattering and isotopic scattering32,38,

Figure 7
figure7

The (a) three-phonon, (b) isotopic and (c) total relaxation time of each phonon branch as a function of frequency.

Thus the three-phonon processes with much shorter relaxation time will dominate the total relaxation time. The total relaxation time of stanene is shown in Fig. 7(c). It is in the same order of magnitude as that of graphene, MoS2 and silicene26,48,50. As shown in Fig. 7(c), the total relaxation time of LA mode has large values near the acoustic-optical frequency gap, while it is still comparable to that of other acoustic phonon modes at low frequencies. To investigate the phonon scattering mechanism more deeply, we calculate the allowed phase space for three-phonon processes P3.

In the temperature range where three-phonon processes are dominant, the total phase space for three-phonon processes P3 is defined by15,51

where Ω is a normalization factor, and

and

where corresponds to absorption processes, i.e. , whereas corresponds to emission processes, i.e. . According to Eq. (4, 5, 6), P3 contains a large amount of scattering events that satisfy the conservation conditions and can be used to assess quantitatively the number of scattering channels available for each phonon mode. Less restricted phase space for three-phonon processes implies a larger number of available scattering channels. Consequently, there is an inverse relationship between P3 and the intrinsic lattice thermal conductivity of a material38,51.

The P3 for absorption and emission processes are shown in Fig. 8(a,b), respectively. The phase space for absorption processes of LA phonons is much smaller than of ZA and TA phonons, while the phase space for emission processes of LA phonons is comparable to of TA phonons at low frequencies but much larger than that of ZA phonons. According to Eq. (4), the calculated total three-phonon phase space P3 for LA phonons is smaller than P3 of ZA/TA phonons in a large part of the low-frequency range, shown in Fig. 8(c). The reason for the relatively small P3 of LA phonons is due to the fact that the energy of LA phonons are relatively high and subsequently the scattering channels, LA + LA/TA/ZA ↔ TA/ZA, are restricted. As a result, the relatively small P3 alongside with relatively large group velocities of LA phonons as mentioned above, determines that LA phonons contribute dominantly to κ of stanene.

Figure 8
figure8

Frequency-dependence of three-phonon scattering phase space at 300 K for (a) absorption processes, (b) emission processes and (c) all three-phonon processes.

As for ZA phonons, while the relatively low energy of ZA phonons severely restricts the corresponding phase space for emission processes , it also provides a larger number of available scattering channels, ZA + TA/ZA ↔ LA/TA, which leads to larger of ZA phonons and hence a reduced contribution to κ at low frequencies.

It is well known that the dominant contribution of ZA phonons to the κ of graphene is due to a symmetry selection rule in such one-atom-thick materials, which strongly restricts anharmonic phonon-phonon scattering of the ZA mode40. The selection rule in graphene that arises from the reflection symmetry perpendicular to the graphene plane restricts the participation of odd number of ZA phonons in three-phonon processes, e.g. ZA + ZA ↔ ZA, ZA + LA/TA ↔ LA/TA. As a result, 60% of the phase space of ZA phonons is forbidden by the selection rule, which leads to the dominant contribution of the ZA mode to κ in graphene. However, for the case of buckled stanene considered here, the reflection symmetry is broken, which means the selection rule does not apply. Consequently, the relatively large P3 of ZA phonons leads to less contribution from ZA phonons to κ of stanene, i.e. 13% in stanene, compared to 80% in graphene at 300 K.

Size dependence of κ

Since the thermoelectric figure of merit zT can be improved by optimizing the geometry size to maximize the contribution of the gapless edge states, it is also essential to investigate the phonon transport in stanene nanostructures and achieve the optimized transport properties by reducing thermal conductivity through nanostructuring in the practical design of TE nanodevices. We investigate the size dependence of κ by calculating the cumulative thermal conductivity with respect to the maximum MFP allowed. The cumulative thermal conductivity of stanene at different temperatures are plotted in Fig. 9(a). The cumulated κ keeps increasing as MFP increases, until reaching the thermodynamic limit above a length Ldiff which represents the longest mean free path of the heat carriers34,52. The Ldiff at 150 K, 300 K, 450 K, 600 K and 750 K are 107.2 μm, 50.9 μm, 35.1 μm, 25.5 μm and 24.2 μm, respectively. It is found that phonons with MFPs below 73.9 μm at 150 K, 16.9 μm at 300 K, 9.5 μm at 450 K, 8.4 μm at 600 K and 6.6 μm at 750 K, respectively, contribute around 75% of the total κ, which indicates that the design of nanostructures can be utilized to reduce κ and enhance zT. In order to properly reduce κ for thermoelectric applications, we can fit the cumulative κ to a uniparametric function15

Figure 9
figure9

(a) Cumulative lattice thermal conductivity of stanene as a function of the phonon MFP at 150 K, 300 K, 450 K, 600 K and 750 K. The curves fitted by Eq. (7) are plotted with dot lines. (b) Thermal conductivities of stanene nanowires along [100] direction as a function of width.

where κmax is the ultimate cumulative thermal conductivity, lmax is the maximal MFP concerned and l0 is the parameter to be evaluated. The fitted curves at different temperatures are plotted in Fig. 9(a), reproducing both the slope and the position of the calculated data well when lmax > l0. It yields the parameter l0 of 5.72 μm, 2.71 μm, 1.77 μm, 1.31 μm and 0.95 μm for 150 K, 300 K, 450 K, 600 K and 750 K, respectively, which can be interpreted as representative of the MFP of relevant heat-carrying phonons in stanene.

Furthermore, when the size gets smaller than l0, the nanostructuring-induced phonon scattering becomes dominant over the three-phonon scattering and the small-grain-limit reduced κ becomes proportional to a constant value lSG15. We calculate the ratio of the thermal conductivity to the thermal conductivity per unit of MFP in the small-grain limit; for stanene the lSG is found to be 195.0 nm, 92.1 nm, 60.9 nm, 45.6 nm and 36.5 nm at 150 K, 300 K, 450 K, 600 K and 750 K, respectively. This quantity is crucial to the thermal design for modulating the thermal conductivity in the small-grain limit, for example nanowires.

It is worthy to mention that for a nanowire system, phonons with long MFPs will be strongly scattered by the boundary, thus the contribution from which to κ will be limited. As shown in Fig. 9(b), κ decreases with decreasing width of stanene nanowires and drops to half the maximum κ in the thermodynamic limit at widths about 1.3 μm.

In summary, we predict the lattice thermal conductivity of stanene using first principle calculations and an iterative solution of the BTE. A much lower thermal conductivity is observed in stanene than other 2D materials. Our results indicate that stanene, as a 2D topological insulator with low thermal conductivity, can realize much higher thermoelectric efficiency and is a promising candidate for next-generation thermoelectric devices. The predicted contribution of LA phonons to thermal conductivity in stanene is larger than 57% due to high phonon group velocities and restricted phase space for three-phonon processes. The representative MFP of stanene is obtained for the purpose of future design in TE-application nanostructures. The MFP in the small-grain limit is also obtained for designing TE devices when the size decreases and the nanostructuring-induced phonon scattering dominates.

Methods

All the calculations are performed using the Vienna ab-initio simulation package (VASP) based on density functional theory (DFT)53. We choose the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) in the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) parametrization for the exchange-correlation functional. We use the projector-augmented-wave potential with 4d electrons of tin described as valence and a plane-wave basis set is employed with kinetic energy cutoff of 500 eV. A 15 × 15 × 1 k-mesh is used during structural relaxation for the unit cell until the energy differences are converged within 10−6 eV, with a Hellman-Feynman force convergence threshold of 10−4 eV/Å. To eliminate interactions between the adjacent supercells a minimum of 15 Å vacuum spacing is kept.

In the calculation of phonon dispersion, the harmonic interatomic force constants (IFCs) are obtained using density functional perturbation theory (DFPT), which calculates the dynamical matrix through the linear response of electron density54. The 5 × 5 × 1 supercell with 5 × 5 × 1 k-mesh is used to ensure the convergence. The phonon dispersion is obtained using the Phonopy code with the harmonic IFCs as input55.

To calculate thermal conductivity of stanene, anharmonic third order IFCs are needed, besides the harmonic IFCs mentioned above. The same 5 × 5 × 1 supercell and 5 × 5 × 1 k-mesh are used to obtain the anharmonic IFCs and an interaction range of 8.5 Å is considered herein, which includes fifth-nearest-neighbor atoms. We calculate the thermal conductivity of naturally occuring and isotopically pure stanene by solving the phonon Boltzmann transport equation (BTE) using the ShengBTE code15,56,57, which is completely parameter-free and based only on the information of the chemical structure.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Peng, B. et al. Low lattice thermal conductivity of stanene. Sci. Rep. 6, 20225; doi: 10.1038/srep20225 (2016).

References

  1. Ferrari, A. C. et al. Science and technology roadmap for graphene, related two-dimensional crystals and hybrid systems. Nanoscale 7, 4598–4810 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Novoselov, K. S. et al. A roadmap for graphene. Nature 490, 192–200 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Buscema, M. et al. Large and tunable photothermoelectric effect in single-layer MoS2 . Nano Letters 13, 358–363 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Klinovaja, J. & Loss, D. Spintronics in MoS2 monolayer quantum wires. Phys. Rev. B 88, 075404 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhu, F.-F. et al. Epitaxial growth of two-dimensional stanene. Nat Mater 14, 1020–1025 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Matusalem, F., Marques, M., Teles, L. K. & Bechstedt, F. Stability and electronic structure of two-dimensional allotropes of group-IV materials. Phys. Rev. B 92, 045436 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu, C.-C., Jiang, H. & Yao, Y. Low-energy effective Hamiltonian involving spin-orbit coupling in silicene and two-dimensional germanium and tin. Phys. Rev. B 84, 195430 (2011).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, C.-C., Feng, W. & Yao, Y. Quantum spin Hall effect in silicene and two-dimensional germanium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 076802 (2011).

    ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Xu, Y. et al. Large-gap quantum spin Hall insulators in tin films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 136804 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu, Y., Gan, Z. & Zhang, S.-C. Enhanced thermoelectric performance and anomalous Seebeck effects in topological insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 226801 (2014).

    ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Qin, G. et al. Hinge-like structure induced unusual properties of black phosphorus and new strategies to improve the thermoelectric performance. Sci. Rep. 4, 6946 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Fan, Z., Zheng, J., Wang, H.-Q. & Zheng, J.-C. Enhanced thermoelectric performance in three-dimensional superlattice of topological insulator thin films. Nanoscale Research Letters 7, 570 (2012).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Takahashi, R. & Murakami, S. Thermoelectric transport in perfectly conducting channels in quantum spin Hall systems. Phys. Rev. B 81, 161302 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Murakami, S., Takahashi, R., Tretiakov, O. A., Abanov, A. & Sinova, J. Thermoelectric transport of perfectly conducting channels in two- and three-dimensional topological insulators. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 334, 012013 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li, W., Carrete, J., Katcho, N. A. & Mingo, N. ShengBTE: A solver of the Boltzmann transport equation for phonons. Computer Physics Communications 185, 1747–1758 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Cahangirov, S., Topsakal, M., Aktürk, E., Şahin, H. & Ciraci, S. Two- and one-dimensional honeycomb structures of silicon and germanium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 236804 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Jain, A. & McGaughey, A. J. H. Strongly anisotropic in-plane thermal transport in single-layer black phosphorene. Sci. Rep. 5, 8501 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Castro Neto, A. H., Guinea, F., Peres, N. M. R., Novoselov, K. S. & Geim, A. K. The electronic properties of graphene. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109–162 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Na, S.-H. & Park, C.-H. First-principles study of structural phase transition of Sn. Journal of the Korean Physical Society 56, 494 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nika, D. L., Pokatilov, E. P., Askerov, A. S. & Balandin, A. A. Phonon thermal conduction in graphene: Role of Umklapp and edge roughness scattering. Phys. Rev. B 79, 155413 (2009).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Saito, R., Dresselhaus, G. & Dresselhaus, M. S. Physical Properties of Carbon Nanotubes (Imperial College, 1998).

  22. Huang, L.-F., Cao, T.-F., Gong, P. L. & Zeng, Z. Isotope effects on the vibrational, Invar and Elinvar properties of pristine and hydrogenated graphene. Solid State Commun. 190, 5 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang, L.-F., Gong, P.-L. & Zeng, Z. Phonon properties, thermal expansion and thermomechanics of silicene and germanene. Phys. Rev. B 91, 205433 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Qin, G. et al. Anisotropic intrinsic lattice thermal conductivity of phosphorene from first principles. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 4854–4858 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Carrete, J., Mingo, N. & Curtarolo, S. Low thermal conductivity and triaxial phononic anisotropy of SnSe. Applied Physics Letters 105, 101907 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Li, X. et al. Intrinsic electrical transport properties of monolayer silicene and MoS2 from first principles. Phys. Rev. B 87, 115418 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu, T.-H., Chen, Y.-C., Pao, C.-W. & Chang, C.-C. Anisotropic thermal conductivity of monolayer MoS2 nanoribbons: Chirality and edge effects. Applied Physics Letters 104, 201909 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ong, Z.-Y. & Pop, E. Effect of substrate modes on thermal transport in supported graphene. Phys. Rev. B 84, 075471 (2011).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu, T.-H. & Chang, C.-C. Anisotropic thermal transport in phosphorene: Effects of crystal orientation. Nanoscale 7, 10648–10654 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gu, X. & Yang, R. First-principles prediction of phononic thermal conductivity of silicene: A comparison with graphene. Journal of Applied Physics 117, 025102 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Xu, Y., Li, Z. & Duan, W. Thermal and thermoelectric properties of graphene. Small 10, 2182–2199 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Li, W., Carrete, J. & Mingo, N. Thermal conductivity and phonon linewidths of monolayer MoS2 from first principles. Applied Physics Letters 103, 253103 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Peng, B. et al. Thermal conductivity of monolayer MoS2, MoSe2 and WS2: Interplay of mass effect, interatomic bonding and anharmonicity. arXiv:1509, 01391 (2015).

  34. Peng, B., Zhang, H., Shao, H., Zhang, X. & Zhu, H. Towards intrinsic phonon transport in single-layer MoS2: The diffusive limit of thermal conductivity. arXiv:1508, 03435 (2015).

  35. Kaul, P. B. & Prakash, V. Carrier interactions and porosity initiated reversal of temperature dependence of thermal conduction in nanoscale tin films. Journal of Applied Physics 115, 023520 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Bryant, C. A. & Keesom, P. H. Low-temperature specific heat of indium and tin. Phys. Rev. 123, 491–499 (1961).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Nakashima, T. & Umakoshi, Y. Anisotropy of electrical resistivity and thermal expansion of single-crystal Ti5Si3 . Philosophical Magazine Letters 66, 317–321 (1992).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ziman, J. M. Electrons and Phonons: The Theory of Transport Phenomena in Solids (Oxford University Press, 1960).

  39. Grimvall, G. Thermophysical properties of materials (Elsevier Science, 1999).

  40. Lindsay, L., Broido, D. A. & Mingo, N. Flexural phonons and thermal transport in graphene. Phys. Rev. B 82, 115427 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. Parker, D. & Singh, D. J. High-temperature thermoelectric performance of heavily doped PbSe. Phys. Rev. B 82, 035204 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. Pulikkotil, J. J. et al. Doping and temperature dependence of thermoelectric properties in Mg2 (Si, Sn). Phys. Rev. B 86, 155204 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. Fugallo, G., Lazzeri, M., Paulatto, L. & Mauri, F. Ab initio variational approach for evaluating lattice thermal conductivity. Phys. Rev. B 88, 045430 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. Yan, R. et al. Thermal conductivity of monolayer molybdenum disulfide obtained from temperature-dependent Raman spectroscopy. ACS Nano 8, 986–993 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Pisoni, A. et al. The role of transport agents in MoS2 single crystals. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 119, 3918–3922 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Efetov, D. K. & Kim, P. Controlling electron-phonon interactions in graphene at ultrahigh carrier densities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 256805 (2010).

    ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Lindsay, L., Broido, D. A. & Reinecke, T. L. First-principles determination of ultrahigh thermal conductivity of Boron Arsenide: A competitor for diamond? Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 025901 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lindsay, L. et al. Phonon thermal transport in strained and unstrained graphene from first principles. Phys. Rev. B 89, 155426 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. Ziman, J. The thermal properties of materials. Scientific American 217 (1967).

  50. Gu, X. & Yang, R. Phonon transport in single-layer transition metal dichalcogenides: A first-principles study. Applied Physics Letters 105, 131903 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. Lindsay, L. & Broido, D. A. Three-phonon phase space and lattice thermal conductivity in semiconductors. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 20, 165209 (2008).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. Fugallo, G. et al. Thermal conductivity of graphene and graphite: Collective excitations and mean free paths. Nano Letters 14, 6109–6114 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Baroni, S., de Gironcoli, S., Dal Corso, A. & Giannozzi, P. Phonons and related crystal properties from density-functional perturbation theory. Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 515–562 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Togo, A., Oba, F. & Tanaka, I. First-principles calculations of the ferroelastic transition between rutile-type and CaCl2-type SiO2 at high pressures. Phys. Rev. B 78, 134106 (2008).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. Li, W. et al. Thermal conductivity of diamond nanowires from first principles. Phys. Rev. B 85, 195436 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. Li, W., Lindsay, L., Broido, D. A., Stewart, D. A. & Mingo, N. Thermal conductivity of bulk and nanowire Mg2SixSn1−x alloys from first principles. Phys. Rev. B 86, 174307 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants No. 11374063 and 11404348 and 973 program (No. 2013CAB01505).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

B.P. performed the calculations. H.Z. conceived the project. B.P., H.S., Y.X. and X.Z. analyzed the data. H.Z. and H.Z. supervised the research. B.P. and H.Z. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peng, B., Zhang, H., Shao, H. et al. Low lattice thermal conductivity of stanene. Sci Rep 6, 20225 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20225

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing