Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Three-dimensional direct cell patterning in collagen hydrogels with near-infrared femtosecond laser

Abstract

We report a methodology for three-dimensional (3D) cell patterning in a hydrogel in situ. Gold nanorods within a cell-encapsulating collagen hydrogel absorb a focused near-infrared femtosecond laser beam, locally denaturing the collagen and forming channels, into which cells migrate, proliferate and align in 3D. Importantly, pattern resolution is tunable based on writing speed and laser power and high cell viability (>90%) is achieved using higher writing speeds and lower laser intensities. Overall, this patterning technique presents a flexible direct-write method that is applicable in tissue engineering systems where 3D alignment is critical (such as vascular, neural, cardiac and muscle tissue).

Introduction

Tissue engineering offers the ability to generate functional tissues for implantation and in vitro modeling1. Three-dimensional (3D) cellular organization is critical to the function of a given tissue and moreover, 3D cell alignment in tissues such as vasculature, neural, cardiac and muscle, plays an integral role in their overall function2,3,4,5,6. Thus, methods that enable 3D cellular patterning and direct 3D tissue organization are of high importance7,8. Hydrogels – water-swollen polymer networks - are extensively used as the scaffolding in engineered tissues9. There are various ways to control hydrogel structure in 3D for the purpose of dictating cellular organization and alignment. 3D printing, which includes extrusion, stereolithography and projection printing, builds hydrogel structures in an additive fashion10,11,12. On the other hand, the selective removal of material from a bulk gel (for instance, using a ultrafast laser) can also generate 3D structures with precise architecture13,14.

To this end, we have developed a novel patterning method that controls the spatial organization of cells in a 3D collagen hydrogel. The hydrogel, composed of gold nanorods and encapsulated cells, reacts to a focused near-infrared (NIR) laser beam to thermally denature the collagen in a computer-directed pattern. Nanorods absorb NIR light and convert this energy to heat – called the photothermal effect – thus, stimulating thermal denaturation of the surrounding collagen matrix (Fig. 1). Photothermal activation of temperature-sensitive materials has previously been explored for triggering drug release, bulk hydrogel degradation and 2D hydrogel patterning10,15,16. Here, we report for the first time its utility in 3D hydrogel patterning. Patterning takes place within milliseconds and can be tuned by the laser writing speed and laser power. Channels produced within the hydrogel cause cell migration and 3D cell alignment to the patterns over a period of 14 days. We hypothesize this is due, in part, to the denaturation and uncrosslinking of the collagen fibrils, which denature at 55 °C. This single-step process has broad applicability in tissue engineering systems requiring 3D cell alignment – including vascular, neural, cardiac and muscle tissue.

Figure 1
figure1

Schematic of the patterning process and resulting cell response.

(A) A near-infrared (NIR) laser is focused inside the optically clear hydrogel and triggers the photothermal degradation of the collagen internally according to a computer-generated design, thereby creating channels. (B) Image of gel within the glass dish, with outset showing the corresponding brightfield image.

Results

Gold Nanorod Characterization

Using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), average length, width and aspect ratio for the PEG-nanorods was determined to be 41.4 ± 3.5 nm, 10.7 ± 0.6 nm and 3.86 ± 0.4, respectively (Supplementary Figure S1). These values are in line with previous literature for nanorods that absorb the laser wavelength of 800 nm17. Nanorods with this size distribution consisted of >90% of the total gold nanoparticles in solution, with a small fraction existing as gold nanospheres or cubes. Thus, we anticipated that the number of gold nanorods within our collagen hydrogels are similar (or at least within the same order of magnitude) to the evaluated concentration of 5.45 e-9 moles nanorods per liter.

Additionally, we did not anticipate any morphology changes to the gold nanorods due to NIR light exposure since our femtosecond laser operates in nJ energy per pulse range – morphology changes often occur at higher energy levels in the μJ or mJ ranges18.

Collagen Hydrogel Characterization

Collagen hydrogels with gold nanorods displayed an absorbance profile similar to that of the nanorods in solution (Fig. 2A), peaking at 800 nm–coinciding with the wavelength of the NIR femtosecond laser. Collagen hydrogels without nanorods, conversely, showed low absorbance at 800 nm. When exposed to maximum power and the slowest speed (290 mW, 0.25 mm/s), collagen hydrogels without nanorods (collagen – NR) showed no changes in hydrogel morphology and resulting cell organization, suggesting the gold nanorods played a key role in the patterning mechanism (Supplemental Figure S2).

Figure 2
figure2

Characterization of hydrogel patterning.

(A) Absorbance of collagen hydrogels with and without nanorods, compared to nanorods in aqueous solution. The laser wavelength is also highlighted (800 nm). (B) Representative brightfield images of the patterned lines at different writing speeds 0.25, 0.75 and 2.0 mm/s at 100 mW laser power. Characterization of patterned line widths in response to various writing speeds (0.25, 0.75, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2.0 mm/s) and laser powers (100, 150, 185, 290 mW)

Internal patterning of the collagen-nanorod hydrogel is a modular process, where laser power and writing speed (in millimeters per second, mm/s) can alter the diameter of the resulting channel pattern. Figure 2B displays brightfield images of the resulting patterns in the collagen gel exposed to 100 mW or 150 mW laser power, at laser scanning speeds of 0.25 mm/s, 0.75 mm/s, or 2.0 mm/s. Figure 2B also shows the graphical representation of this data. An inverse relationship exists between the writing speed and pattern width. Laser power determines the threshold pattern size, where 100 mW can generate 8.7 ± 0.5 μm resolution patterns (equal to the diameter of the laser beam) while higher powers such as 150 mW and 190 mW plateaued at 56.7 ± 3.0 μm and 128.6 ± 9.3 μm, respectively. Patterns made with 290 mW power were barely distinguishable as the response in the collagen gel degraded the entire construct, however at a speed of 2.0 mm/s, the resolution was roughly 179.3 ± 23.5 μm. Writing speeds greater than 2.0 mm/s were not possible due to limitations with the automated stage, but presumably the patterns could become even more optically defined with faster speeds.

Cell Viability Assessment

Cell experiments were carried out using bend3 endothelial cells at a concentration of 1000 cells per μl in the collagen-nanorod hydrogels. We patterned channels using various powers and writing speeds and performed a fluorescent live/dead assay with calcein AM/ethidium homodimer to assess cell viability (Fig. 3). Patterns created with higher powers and slower writing speeds produced higher cell death as compared to lower laser power and faster writing speeds. For instance, by keeping the laser power constant at 100 mW and changing the writing speed from 0.25 to 2.0 mm/s (Fig. 3a,b), we were able to increase the cell viability from 45 ± 5% to 90 ± 4%, respectively. By reducing the power to 50 mW at the slower speed of 0.25 mm/s, we increased cell viability to 96 ± 3%, though pattern fidelity was less visualized. Ultimately, we chose a writing speed of 2.0 mm/s and laser power of 100 mW for the remaining cell experiments due to their high pattern fidelity and high cell viability (>90%).

Figure 3
figure3

Live (green)/dead (red) fluorescence images and resulting cell viability (live cells as a percent of total cells) according to different writing speeds (mm/s) and laser intensities (mW).

Patterns Guide 3D Cell Migration, Elongation and Alignment

We allowed collagen gels to incubate for several weeks, during which we observed cell migration towards the patterns, cell elongation on the walls and by day 14, maturing of this 3D cell alignment (Fig. 4A). We confirmed that the channels were inducing this cellular organization by comparing with hydrogels without patterns (Supplementary Figure S3). It is clearly shown that the patterns induce cellular tube formation.

Figure 4
figure4

Endothelial cell response to 3D patterning.

(A) Cell migration and tube formation, visualized in brightfield. (B) endothelial tube formation visualized with confocal, showing hollow cores in the YZ plane and aligned endothelial cells in the XY plane.

We hypothesized that the cell elongation was a hollow tube structure, as we were creating channels. Thus after day 14, the gels were fixed and stained for actin and nuclei and imaged using confocal microscopy. Using Volocity 3D reconstruction software (PerkinElmer Inc), we were able to visually observe the tube structure (Fig. 4B) and XY and YZ planes confirmed the tubes length and hollow nature (Fig. 4B outset). These data suggest tube formation occurred along the hollowed degraded channel and that endothelial cells populated the channel walls, forming hollow tubes that could predicate 3D cell microtubule formation.

It is worth noting that at the higher laser powers (e.g. >150 mW) and slower writing speeds (e.g. 0.25 mm/s), the bottom of the channel degraded completely, accompanied by high cell death (Supplementary Figure S4). Despite the increase in cell death, the outputted structure retained a curved valley floor that cells within the hydrogel (and possibly not in the initial area of cell death) migrated and adhered to, forming a 3D cell layer on the peaks and troughs.

Discussion

Photolabile materials include those that respond to a specific wavelength of light (e.g. UV) to trigger a chemical or physical process such as degradation or crosslinking. Spatial degradation of a UV-responsive material was previously explored for directing 3D cellular responses, however, one disadvantage of this system is the relatively long timescale–in minutes–to achieve patterning14. Moreover, utility of shorter wavelengths (<400 nm) can be damaging to cellular content due to higher light absorption by water. Here we demonstrated hydrogel patterning with NIR light as a more benign way to pattern hydrogels as NIR can penetrate water or tissues up to several centimeters, making it an ideal candidate for tissue engineering applications19. Gold nanorods efficiently absorb NIR light and release this energy in the form of phonons (i.e. heat), called the photothermal effect, thus providing a mechanism for thermally denaturing the surrounding collagen matrix. Laser exposure parameters control the extent of this denaturation, which presumably alters mechanical properties of the hydrogel. It is widely known that matrix stiffness plays a crucial role in determining cell fate, such as cell migration and stem cell differentiation20.

Importantly, PEGylated gold nanorods at our concentration (5.45 nM) were not cytotoxic to cells for the duration of the experiments, which is in line with previous literature21. They may interact with cell membranes and can even be endocytosed, however, which may play a role in altering RNA, thus expression levels should be noted when considering a certain cell type or intended application22,23. Though we did not explore this option, the nanorod-cell interaction provides an interesting mechanism for local drug delivery. Nanorods can be functionalized with proteins and drugs and can be triggered to release their payload by NIR light (via the photothermal effect) or by becoming endocytosed24.

We previously explored the photothermal heating platform for patterning stiffness changes on a hydrogel substrate in 2D, however, to our knowledge, this concept has not yet been explored in 3D hydrogel patterning16. Additionally, it was previously demonstrated that hydrated collagen (similar to our collagen hydrogel) denatures at 55 °C25. Thus, it can be interpreted that our patterns are momentarily (i.e. for milliseconds) heating up to this temperature during patterning before returning to sink conditions of 37 °C. Below a certain threshold (e.g. patterning at 50 mW and 2.0 mm/s) we see neither a visible pattern nor any cell response (data not shown). Therefore we believe the collagen is not denaturing in this instance.

As with any new fabrication/materials/ process, finding an application for NR induced hydrogel degradation is key. We found that the right combination collagen material (e.g. 4 mg/ml), laser writing speed and laser power allowed for fabrication of 3D channels inside a pre-made collagen encapsulating cell network with low cell death (<10%). Using an automated XY stage attached to the laser microscope (which controls the movements of the laser beam) enabled the patterning of parallel channels f or which cells migrated, aligned and in the base of endothelial cells, formed hollow tubes similar to vascular tube formation. Previously, only a few groups have reported guidance of tube formation using labor-intensive techniques such as micromolding and casting26,27.

One such model that stands to benefit from this novel process is an angiogenesis model, whereby the creation of 3D endothelial tubes and subsequent seeding of a second cell type (e.g. cancer) can provide a facile means of studying angiogenesis between the two cell populations. Another possibility is to implement this platform with more complex vascular structures in hopes of guiding a biomimetic cellular organization (e.g. bifurcation) in vitro. It would also be advantageous to assess the perfusibility of these hollow tubes following patterning, cell migration and tube formation. Lastly, this patterning technique could be employed for 3D cell patterning of other tissue types that demonstrate 3D alignment in vivo – including cardiac, muscle and neural.

Conclusion

The described platform allows for the patterning of internal channels in collagen hydrogels in situ, in this case enabling endothelial recruitment, alignment and tube formation. Alignment of nearby cells can be visualized as early as 1 day post-patterning, while migration and tube formation may take up to 14 days. This platform has broad applications in in vitro cell patterning and can be applied to a host of light-responsive materials in addition to collagen. Furthermore, more complex patterns and additionally other cell types, could be implemented to achieve a broader degree of 3D cell patterning for tissue engineering applications.

Methods

Materials

For gold nanorods, hydrochloroauric acid (HAuCl4), silver nitrate (AgNO3), sodium borohydride (NaBH4) and L-ascorbic acid were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) was purchased from CalBioChem (EMD Millipore). Milli-Q water (18.2 Ω, MilliPore) was used in all synthesis steps. mPEG-thiol (5 kDa) (Nanocs) was used in nanorod surface modification. For hydrogels, collagen I, High Concentration (8.7 mg/mL) (VWR) was purchased.

Gold Nanorod Synthesis and Surface Modification

Gold nanroods were synthesized and using a seed-mediated growth and surface-modification methodology as previously described with some modifications28. 7.5 mL 0.1 M of CTAB was mixed with 250 μL 0.01 M HAuCl4, followed by addition of 600 μL 0.01 NaBH4. Seeds formed after 2 minutes of mixing. The growth solution was prepared by mixing 40 mL of 0.1 M CTAB, 1.7 mL 0.01 M HAuCl4, 250 μL of 0.01 AgNO3 and 270 μL of 0.1 M L-ascorbic acid, followed by 420 μL of the seed solution. Nanorods formed after several hours. Nanorods were surface modified by first centrifuging twice at 15,000 g, removing the supernatant and resuspending in diH2O, followed by adding mPEG-SH dropwise and allow to gently mix for 2 hours. Nanorods were again pelleted and washed in diH2O to remove excess reactants and sterilized through a 0.22 μm filter for later use. Final nanorod concentration was determined to be 5.45 e-9 M by absorbance readings at its plasmon resonance (~800 nm).

Cell Culture

Bend3 mouse endothelial cells were used for cell culture experiments. Bend3 were grown in EGM-2 media (Lonza) and passaged several times after thawing. In preparation for collagen gel experiments, cells were trypsinized in 0.25% trypsin-EDTA, pelleted and resuspended in EGM-2 at various concentrations (1.0 million/mL up to 5 million/mL).

Gelation of Collagen-nanorod Hydrogels

Collagen gels were formed using the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, an ice-cold mixture of 1.04 μL of 1N NaOH, 10 μL 10× dPBS and 10 μL of nanorods at their final concentration was prepared. Next, 33 μL of either diH2O or cells at various concentrations (in EGM-2) was added, again kept at 4 degrees. 46 μL of stock Collagen I (8.7 mg/mL) was added to the solution and pipetted slowly to mix the contents without producing air bubbles. The mixed solution was then added to 35 mm glass-bottom dishes with 10 mm wells (#0 cover glass, In Vitro Scientific) and placed in the incubator (37 degrees C, 5.0% CO2) for 30 minutes. Following gelation, 2 mL of warmed EGM-2 media was added for cell culture.

In Vitro Hydrogel Patterning with bend3 Endothelial Cells

Gels were immediately used for patterning following gelation and addition of warmed media. The glass dishes were placed on an automatic stage atop an inverted microscope (Olympus). A femtosecond laser beam (100 femtoseconds, 800 nm wavelength, 80 MHz, Coherent) was used to pattern the samples. The laser was focused through the laser objective lens (10×, NA 0.45) and onto the gel sample. Patterns were drawn inside the hydrogels by varying the focal plane of the beam (in z-direction) and according to digital masks designed on the computer, with controlled writing speeds (mm/s) using the stage controller (MS2000, ASI). Average power of the laser beam was modulated using an attenuator, varying the power from 100–290 mW, read by a power meter (Coherent Fieldmax).

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Hribar, K. C. et al. Three-dimensional direct cell patterning in collagen hydrogels with near-infrared femtosecond laser. Sci. Rep. 5, 17203; doi: 10.1038/srep17203 (2015).

References

  1. Griffith, L. G. & Naughton, G. Tissue engineering - Current challenges and expanding opportunities. Science 295, 1009–1014 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bae, H. et al. Building vascular networks. Science translational medicine 4, 160–182 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aizawa, Y., Wylie, R. & Shoichet, M. Endothelial cell guidance in 3D patterned scaffolds. Advanced materials 22, 4831–4835 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aubin, H. et al. Directed 3D cell alignment and elongation in microengineered hydrogels. Biomaterials 31, 6941–6951 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cukierman, E., Pankov, R. & Yamada, K. M. Cell interactions with three-dimensional matrices. Current opinion in cell biology 14, 633–639 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Loessner, D. et al. Bioengineered 3D platform to explore cell-ECM interactions and drug resistance of epithelial ovarian cancer cells. Biomaterials 31, 8494–8506 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rouwkema, J., Rivron, N. C. & van Blitterswijk, C. A. Vascularization in tissue engineering. Trends in biotechnology 26, 434–441 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Novosel, E. C., Kleinhans, C. & Kluger, P. J. Vascularization is the key challenge in tissue engineering. Advanced drug delivery reviews 63, 300–311 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brandl, F., Sommer, F. & Goepferich, A., Rational design of hydrogels for tissue engineering: impact of physical factors on cell behavior. Biomaterials 28, 134–146 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hribar, K. C., Soman, P., Warner, J., Chung, P. & Chen, S. Light-assisted direct-write of 3D functional biomaterials. Lab on a chip 14, 268–275 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, A. et al. Rapid fabrication of complex 3D extracellular microenvironments by dynamic optical projection stereolithography. Advanced materials 31, 4266–4270 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kolesky, D. B. et al. 3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue constructs. Advanced materials 26, 3124–3130 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. DeForest, C. A. & Anseth, K. S. Cytocompatible click-based hydrogels with dynamically tunable properties through orthogonal photoconjugation and photocleavage reactions. Nature chemistry 3, 925–931 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kloxin, A. M., Kasko, A. M., Salinas, C. N. & Anseth, K. S. Photodegradable hydrogels for dynamic tuning of physical and chemical properties. Science 324, 59–63 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hribar, K. C., Lee, M. H., Lee, D. & Burdick, J. A. Enhanced release of small molecules from near-infrared light responsive polymer-nanorod composites. ACS nano 5, 2948–2956 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hribar, K. C., Choi, Y. S., Ondeck, M. G., Engler, A. J. & Chen, S. Digital Plasmonic Patterning for Localized Tuning of Hydrogel Stiffness. Adv Funct Mater 24, 4922–4926 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang, X. & El-Sayed, M. A. Gold nanoparticles: Optical properties and implementations in cancer diagnosis and photothermal therapy. Journal of Advanced Research 1, 13–28 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Link, S., Wang, Z. L. & El-Sayed, M. A. How Does a Gold Nanorod Melt? Journal of Physical Chemistry B 104, 7867–7870 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Weissleder, R. A clearer vision for in vivo imaging. Nature biotechnology 19, 316–317 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Engler, A. J., Sen, S., Sweeney, H. L. & Discher, D. E. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126, 677–689 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Niidomea, T. et al. PEG-modified gold nanorods with a stealth character for in vivo applications. Journal of Controlled Release 114, 343–347 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Grabinski, C. et al. Effect of Gold Nanorod Surface Chemistry on Cellular Response. ACS Nano 5, 2870–2879 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sisco, P. N. et al. The Effect of Gold Nanorods on Cell-Mediated Collagen Remodeling. Nano Letters 8, 3409–3412 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Alkilany, A. M., Thompson, L. B., Boulos, S. P. Sisco, P. N. & Murphy, C. J. Gold nanorods: Their potential for photothermal therapeutics and drug delivery, tempered by the complexity of their biological interactions. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 64, 190–199 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bozec, L. & Odlyha, M. Thermal denaturation studies of collagen by microthermal analysis and atomic force microscopy. Biophysical journal 101, 228–236 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Miller, J. S. et al. Rapid casting of patterned vascular networks for perfusable engineered three-dimensional tissues. Nature materials 11, 768–774 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Baranski, J. D. et al. Geometric control of vascular networks to enhance engineered tissue integration and function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110, 7586–7591 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liao, H. W. & Hafner, J. H. Gold nanorod bioconjugates. Chem Mater 17, 4636–4641 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project received support from the National Science Foundation (Grants no. 1130894 and 1332681) and National Institutes of Health (Grant no. EB017876). We’d like to thank Dr. Amy Rommel and Prof. Inder Verma of the Salk Institute for Biological Studies for graciously providing the bend3 cell line. We’d also like to acknowledge Yu Suk Choi (Assistant Professor at University of Sydney) for helpful conversations.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

K.C.H., K.M., X.Q. and S.C. designed the experiments, K.C.H., K.M., J.L. and W.Z. performed the experiments and all contributed to manuscript preparation.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hribar, K., Meggs, K., Liu, J. et al. Three-dimensional direct cell patterning in collagen hydrogels with near-infrared femtosecond laser. Sci Rep 5, 17203 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17203

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing