Sequential Single Shot X-ray Photon Correlation Spectroscopy at the SACLA Free Electron Laser

Abstract

Hard X-ray free electron lasers allow for the first time to access dynamics of condensed matter samples ranging from femtoseconds to several hundred seconds. In particular, the exceptional large transverse coherence of the X-ray pulses and the high time-averaged flux promises to reach time and length scales that have not been accessible up to now with storage ring based sources. However, due to the fluctuations originating from the stochastic nature of the self-amplified spontaneous emission (SASE) process the application of well established techniques such as X-ray photon correlation spectroscopy (XPCS) is challenging. Here we demonstrate a single-shot based sequential XPCS study on a colloidal suspension with a relaxation time comparable to the SACLA free-electron laser pulse repetition rate. High quality correlation functions could be extracted without any indications for sample damage. This opens the way for systematic sequential XPCS experiments at FEL sources.

Introduction

Studying dynamics of complex materials is one of the key topics at X-ray free electron laser (FEL) facilities. In particular, dynamics ranging from femtoseconds to seconds over length scales between atomic dimensions and several hundred nm can be studied by X-ray Photon Correlation Spectroscopy (XPCS)1,2,3. XPCS is a well established technique to probe the time evolution of condensed matter systems using coherent X-rays, covering, e.g., magnetic domain fluctuations4, rheological properties of soft matter5, capillary wave flucutations6 and slow dynamics in glass-forming systems7,8,9. A more detailed overview on XPCS can be found in recent review publications10,11,12.

In conventional XPCS, so-called sequential-mode XPCS, the temporal evolution of the sample is obtained by tracking changes of the speckle patterns over time. For ultrafast dynamics in the fs to ns regime, split-pulse techniques have been proposed and are currently under commissioning or development at hard X-ray FEL facilities13,14,15,16,17,18.

The accessible time scale of sequential XPCS is determined by the repetition rate of the linac at FEL facilities. Currently this allows studies down to 8.3 ms at the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) at the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (USA) or 16.6 ms at the Spring-8 Angstrom Compact free-electron Laser SACLA (Japan)19,20,21. With the European XFEL, the time resolution will be strongly reduced to the 10−7 s regime.

Hard X-ray FEL sources are excellent machines to perform sequential XPCS experiments. First, FEL beams exhibit a superior degree of transverse coherence compared to storage ring based sources; more than 80% are easily achieved22,23,24,25,26. In general, this allows using larger beams and thus potentially less sample damage. Second, current FEL sources provide a photon flux of 1011–1012 coherent photons per single shot in pink beam mode and about 109–1010 monochromatized photons. In contrast, state-of-the-art storage ring beamlines are limited to about 109–1011 photons per second depending on the chosen setup. Thus, FEL sources still provide at least a factor of 10 more coherent photons, allowing to access a factor of 100 shorter relaxation times in XPCS experiments12. Future sources such as the European XFEL will provide 1013 up to 1014 photons per pulse, enabling sequential XPCS at time scales to the sub-μs regime. Third, using a pulsed source such as an XFEL, thermal effects to the sample might be reduced. As discussed by Grübel et al.2 the pulsed structure of the incoming beam allows thermal relaxation of the sample between two subsequent pulses. This is typically not possible at storage ring sources, where the incoming flux has to be reduced in case of radiation sensitive samples. This will be of big benefit to a large class of experiments.

In particular, dynamics studies at large scattering vectors, i.e. probing molecular and atomic length scales27,28,29,30 are challenging at storage ring sources due to the small coherence lengths and low photon flux. For such weakly scattering sample systems, the accessible time scale would be reduced from several seconds27,29 to the millisecond regime and below for future XFEL sources.

Sequential XPCS experiments, however, strongly rely on stable beam conditions, e.g. intensity, contrast and pointing beam stability. While these demands are fullfilled at storage rings, the radiation generated in FEL machines can be dominated by various fluctuations. Therefore, the influence of shot-to-shot fluctuations originating from the stochastic nature of the Self-Amplified Spontaneous Emission (SASE) process in current hard X-ray FELs has to be characterized before performing sequential XPCS.

Carnis et al.31 reported recently a sequential XPCS study on slow dynamics of gold nanoparticles in a molten polymer at the LCLS. In their work, the slow detector read-out of seven seconds restricted the study to slow samples with relaxation times of several 100 seconds. In addition, due to the very weakly scattering sample, it was necessary to integrate over 100 x-ray pulses in order to overcome intensity limitations and shot-to-shot fluctuations. The averaging increased the signal-to-noise ratio, allowing the reach of higher q values at the cost of low contrast (β2 ≈ 0.08–0.12). This low contrast was interpreted as a consequence of SASE pointing fluctuations. Whether or not this is a general phenomenon to be encountered at XFEL machines is of outmost importance for the applicability of sequential mode XPCS. This issue is addressed in this paper.

In XPCS experiments, the sample dynamics is resolved using the correlation function of the scattered intensity I(q, t), given by

where τ is the lag time (in the case of pulsed FEL sources defined by the repetition rate), 〈…〉 denotes an ensemble average over all equivalent times t and detector pixels contained in a chosen wave vector range q ± Δq, q being the modulus of the scattering vector. The measured intensity autocorrelation function can be related to the intermediate scattering function g1(q, τ), assuming that the temporal intensity fluctuations are well described by a normal distribution, using the Siegert relation

where βcorr is the speckle contrast and g is the baseline (equal to 1 for ergodic samples). In the simple case of the diffusive motion of spherical particles, g1 is a simple exponential decay g1(q, τ) = exp(−Γ(q)τ) with Γ(q) = Dq2. D is the translational diffusion coefficient. Obviously, fluctuations of contrast or beam intensity will have significant influence on the extraction of g2 functions.

Here we describe a demonstration experiment at SACLA on a prototypical complex fluid showing that single XFEL pulses can be used to measure the equilibrium dynamics of dilute colloidal suspensions by sequential XPCS. The sample was chosen so that its dynamics can only be accessed by sequential shots of the SACLA linac. Correlation functions g2 with sufficient statistics could be extracted for as few as 50 single shots of an average length of 5.2 fs corresponding to a total X-ray exposure of 260 fs. A detailed analysis shows that there is also a reduced speckle contrast which is approximately a factor of 2 below the expected value defined by the coherence properties of SACLA25. The experiment was however carried out in pink beam mode (without monochromator) so that the reduced temporal coherence also has to be considered. The contributions of eventual beam instabilities was investigated in detail. The results clearly demonstrate the feasibility of sequential single shot XPCS experiments at FEL sources without sample damage.

Results

Single shot speckle patterns were taken from both a static sample consisting of PMMA spheres and a dynamic sample consisting of silica spheres dispersed in glycerol (see Methods for details). An overview of the experimental setup including all key components is shown in Fig. 1. The patterns were analyzed on a single-shot basis and g2-functions were extracted for different batches of subsequent patterns. In Fig. 2 the results are shown for both samples at four selected q-values. As expected, the static sample does not show any time dependence, i.e., the g2-function stays constant. In order to check for radiation effects on the measured dynamics of the silica sample, four batches of data were chosen from the complete, 104 frame long, set of speckle patterns, collected at the same sample position. With the average pulse length of 5.2 fs25,32, this results in a total exposure time of 52 ps. For batch 1, the first 1000 shots, i.e. 5.2 ps total exposure, were analyzed, while batch 2 consists of 1000 shots from the end of the data set. To evaluate the effect of statistics, batch 3 comprises the first 100 shots and batch 4 further 50 shots from the middle of the data set. Details of the various batches are summarized in Table 1. The case of batch 4 corresponds to a total exposure time of approximately 260 fs. Deviations of the correlation functions obtained from these data would show whether the colloidal dynamics changes (e.g. due to radiation damage) during data acquisition. As can be seen from Fig. 2, all correlation functions overlay, indicating no influence from X-ray damage to the sample dynamics. Furthermore, the results from batches 3 and 4 do not differ significantely from the other batches except for larger error bars. This proves that the short runs of 50–100 shots, i.e. 2.5–5 s total experimental time at 20 Hz repetition, is sufficient to measure the sample dynamics.

Table 1 Overview of batch details and resulting contrast βcorr.
Figure 1
figure1

Schematic setup of the experiment.

Each pulse gives rise to a speckle pattern used for the XPCS analysis.

Figure 2
figure2

Correlation functions from different runs explained in the text.

They are fitted with the simple exponential decay (solid black line) for different q values: q1 = 0.025 nm−1, q2 = 0.028 nm−1, q3 = 0.031 nm−1 and q4 = 0.034 nm−1. Data from the static sample are plotted with the green triangles.

The g2-functions were fitted with a single exponential decay

with the relaxation rate Γ(q) = 1/τc(q), where τc denotes the characteristic relaxation time of the sample. In general, the contrast βcorr should equal the degree of coherence βs of the X-ray beam33,34,35,36 if parameters such as detector resolution and speckle size can be neglected. Since the full unmonochromatized SASE beam with a bandwidth of 0.5% was used in this experiment, the measured contrast of the speckle pattern βs is affected by the limited longitudinal coherence length. This can be corrected by a q-dependent correction factor (see methods) following refs 35,36 as shown in our previous publications23,24,25. At SACLA, we found a single shot contrast of βsingle = 0.7 ± 0.1, yielding a transverse coherence of 0.79 ± 0.09 after correction for the longitudinal coherence length. From the g2-functions of the dynamic samples , the contrast can be obtained in the τ → 0 limit. The correlation function from the speckle patterns of a static sample shows no time dependence. Since this sample does not show any dynamics, one obtains the constant value for all lag times τ. The fit of the g2-functions for the dynamic sample yielded contrast values similar to the ones obtained from the static sample. The results that were corrected for contribution from the longitudinal coherence length are shown in Fig. 3(a). The contrast values are given in Table 1. We found a q-independent average contrast of 〈βcorrq = 0.39 ± 0.03. This is about a factor of 2 below the average single shot contrast25.

Figure 3
figure3

(a) The fitted value of contrast β as a function of q for all runs. The dashed line represents the averaged value of 〈βcorr〉 = 0.39, the dashed dotted line the single shot value βs = 0.79 from25. (b) Relaxation rate Γ as a function of q2 for all runs together with a model assuming 97.5% (solid line) and 100% (dashed line) glycerol, respectively.

A plot of the relaxation rate Γ as a function of q2 is presented in Fig. 3(b). In this representation, diffusive motion of the particles manifests itself as a linear dependence of Γ q2, with the slope corresponding to the diffusion coefficient D. This was calculated by taking the fixed temperature in the experimental hutch (T = 27 °C) into account, the measured particle radius (R = 188 nm) and the mass concentration of glycerol Cm. The result for 100% glycerol is shown by the dashed line, clearly underestimating the experimental results. This discrepancy could arise underestimating the sample temperature or overestimating the viscosity of the solvent. Since we were able to obtain g2 functions and observed a quadratic relation Γ q2, direct beam damage of the particles can be neglected. In order to estimate the impact from thermal effects on the sample, the photon energy for each pulse was measured by a calibrated photodiode placed upstream from the KB mirrors. We estimate that an average of approximately 2.3  104 photons per pulse was absorbed by a silica sphere (see Methods for more details). This corresponds to a heat increase of about ΔTsi ≈ 500 K/unit which is far below the melting point of silica around 2000 K. The same calculation for glycerol results in a moderate increase of ΔTgl ≈ 37 K. The deposited energy relaxes by thermal diffusion2,37 on the time scale of tth,gly = 10 μs for glycerol and tth,gly ≈ 1 μs for silica. We are thus forced to conclude that beam-induced steady heating can be neglected because of the repetition rate of 20 Hz, which ensures the thermal relaxation of the sample between subsequent pulses. An appropriate description of the data can be achieved by allowing a minute water content in the glycerol solvent. Assuming a glycerol mass concentration of Cm = 0.975 ± 0.002, which reflects a small water content due to the hygroscopic nature of glycerol, we obtain the solid line in Fig. 3(b), matching the experimental data.

In order to estimate the influence of spatial shot-to-shot fluctuations38, we performed 2D simulations of diffusing spherical particles with an additional random beam displacement and beam size fluctuations (see methods for details). A sketch of the simulation box is shown in Fig. 4(a) and a representative calculated speckle pattern from this arrangement can be found in Fig. 4(b). First, we extracted g2-functions for different degrees of simulated beam displacements with standard deviation σ at a fixed q. The results are shown in Fig. 4(c). The dominant effect on the g2-functions is a decreasing amplitude which is reflected in a loss of contrast β as function of the increasing amplitude of beam displacement (see Fig. 4(d)). Nevertheless, the extracted relaxation rate Γ does not differ within the error bars. Most importantly, as long as the beam displacement is random, no further dynamics contribution is observed. This is demonstrated by normalized correlation functions in Fig. 4(e) and the extracted relaxation rates in Fig. 4(f). Second, an additional change of beam size was modeled with a standard deviation σb. The resulting contrast βsim as function of σ at selected beamsize modulations σb is shown in Fig. 4(d). Without beam displacement and stable beam size (i.e. σ = 0, σb = 0), we observe a contrast of βsim(σ = 0) = 0.72 ± 0.03, which is already slightly below the input value of the spatial coherence of βs = 0.79 ± 0.09 and drops with increasing σ. The experimentally obtained value of βcorr = 0.39 ≈ 0.5βs is achieved for σ ≈ 0.28b. This corresponds to a mean displacement amplitude of less than 0.5 μm. Taking additional beam size changes into account, a contrast drop to 0.39 can be observed for σ = 0.2b and σb = 0.2b. However, we did not take further shot-to-shot variations into account, e.g., jittering incident intensity or change of the beam shape. Such contributions could further lower the contrast.

Figure 4
figure4

Simulation of beam movement.

(a) Snapshot of a simulated sample. The red square is a typical cut out representing the X-ray beam. (b) Typical speckle pattern calculated from (a). The intensity is given in arbitrary log-scale units indicated by the colorbar. (c) Correlation functions g2 calculated from the simulated scattering patterns for a fixed q at different random translations with standard deviation σ. (d) Contrast βsim as function of σ in units of the beam size b for four different beam size modulations σb. The error bars were estimated by repeating the simulations 24 times. The dashed line represents the experimental value of βcorr = 0.39. (e) Correlation functions g2 normalized on the contrast for different values of σ (σb = 0). (f) Extracted relaxation rates for different σ (σb = 0).

Discussion

We demonstrated that single-shot sequential XPCS can be performed at a hard X-ray FEL. Using a prototypical soft matter sample we were able to measure the diffusion of silica spheres in glycerol with a total exposure time of approximately 260 fs. The extracted relaxation rates were modeled by a glycerol-water mixture model with a glycerol fraction of 0.975. Most importantly, there were no indications of direct beam damage during 10000 shots illuminating the sample. The impact from beam-induced heating could be neglected because of the fast timescale of thermal diffusion compared to the repetition rate of SACLA. It is important to note, that such thermal effects will be of major importance at future FEL sources where the distance between two pulses is similar to or shorter than the time scale of thermal diffusion. The contrast obtained from the g2-functions was found to be approximately a factor of two below the single-shot contrast. In general, such a drop of contrast can originate from fast and unresolved processes or beam damage. However, there was no evidence for neither fast processes because the static sample shows the same contrast as the dynamic one nor beam damage as the results for batches taken at the beginning and end of the complete data sets do not differ. We were able to model this reduction of contrast by simulations of a moving and size-changing beam, as observed at FEL facilities38,39. The stability of the beam at SACLA has been previously found to have very small Gaussian distributed beam displacement amplitudes of the full SASE beam with standard deviation σexp ≈ 0.1b and beam size stability of upstream the experimental hutch38. With these values, our simulation would yield a contrast of 0.55. This value is still above the experimentally obtained contrast from the g2-functions of 0.39 ± 0.03. It is however important to mention, that the stability measurements were performed upstream of the Kirkpatrik-Baez (KB) mirror system and high resolution data from the focused beam at the sample position are not available. Whether or not the difference can be attributed to slightly larger fluctuation at the sample position and other shot-to-shot wavefront distortions39 is presently not clear.

In conclusion, we demonstrated a single-shot based sequential XPCS experiment on silica spheres at the FEL SACLA. The results reflect the diffusive nature of the spheres, indicating no beam damage of the sample. The lower contrast of the g2-function was modeled by fluctuations of beam size, pointing stability and coherence variations. Our results prove the feasibility of sequential XPCS at FEL sources and pave the way to experiments at upcoming facilities such as the European XFEL allowing to access timescales below microseconds.

Materials and Methods

Sample preparation

The static sample was prepared by drying a suspension of Poly(methyl-methacrylate) (PMMA) colloidal spheres in decalin inside a quartz capillary. The particles have a mean radius of R = 125.5 nm with a polydispersity of 7.0% that was determined by fitting the particle form factor extracted from scattering patterns from diluted suspensions.

The dynamic sample is composed of 188 nm radius spherical silica particles with a size polydispersity of 3.5% suspended in glycerol. The particles were initially prepared in ethanol using a modified Stöber method40,41. After the synthesis the silica particles were dialysed against deionized water. Afterwards the solvent was exchanged by adding gylcerol to the original suspension and removing the water in a rotary evaporator. The volume fraction of the silica particles was set to ϕ ≈ 0.01. At this volume fraction, no structure factor S(q) can be measured, confirming the Brownian motion nature of the particles. Prior to transferring to a quartz capillary for the measurement, the sample was kept in an oven under vacuum at 50 °C to prevent water absorption. The capillaries were vacuum sealed afterwards. The particle size and the sample dynamics were pre-characterized at beamline P10 of PETRA III at DESY, Germany.

Experimental configuration

The experiment was performed at EH3 of BL3 beamline of the Spring-8 Angstrom Compact Free Electron Laser (SACLA)38 in a small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) geometry. The photon energy was set to 8 keV with a bandwidth of ΔE/E ~ 5 × 10−3. X-ray pulses of (300 ± 40) μJ energy were produced at a repetition rate of 20 Hz. The beam was focused with KB mirrors to 1.8 × 1.5 μm2 at the sample position as measured by knife edge scans. The samples were placed in the MAXIC chamber42. The detector (dual multiport charge coupled device (MPCCD))43 was located at a sample-detector distance of 3 m. At least 10000 single shot diffraction patterns were taken for each sample.

Data analysis

Intensity correlation functions were calculated using the multi-tau algorithm44. Normalization of the scattering data to the azimuthal average within the same frame enabled the measurement of static speckle contrast (see green triangles in Fig. 2).

Impact from longitudinal coherence

The impact of the effect of the longitudinal coherence to the speckle contrast can be calculated to23,24,25,35,36

with beam size L, sample thickness W and the coefficients , and k0 = 2π/λ. In SAXS geometry, this factor is typically equal to 1 for bandwidth of monochromatized beams (Δλ/λ ≤ 10−4). Here we used the natural bandwidth of the FEL radiation of Δλ/λ = 5 × 10−3, resulting in correction factors around 0.925.

Beam-assisted heating of the sample

Knowing the transmission of the focusing system (TrKB = 0.94)45 and of the attenuators used to prevent the detector from being overexposed, we can estimate the energy delivered to the sample position. For the dynamic sample measurement this was on average 0.31 μJ per pulse, which corresponds to 2.4 × 108 photons/pulse. Dividing this value by the beam area gives an average photon density of 8.9 × 1015 photons/pulse/cm2 which is comparable to or lower to previous experiments at LCLS that did not see either any indication of beam damage23,31,37. Using the absorption cross section of the silica particles, a simple calculation yields an average of 2.3  104 photons per pulse absorbed by a silica sphere. This corresponds to 2.5 eV per SiO2 unit. Assuming that this energy is completely converted to heat and stays within the particles, we obtain a heat increase of ΔTSi ≈ 500 K/unit. A similar calculation yields a moderate increase of ΔTgl ≈ 37 K for glycerol. The deposited energy relaxes by thermal diffusion whose time is given by tth = d2/(4Dth), where Dth is the thermal diffusivity2 and d the relaxation length scale. Here, we used d = 2 μm which is slightly larger than the beam size and literature values of the thermal diffusivity46.

Viscosity of glycerol-water mixtures

Although much care was taken to prevent water absorption, it is likely that the sample contained a small amount of water due to the hygroscopic character of glycerol. Since the water content strongly influences the viscosity η of the mixture47,48, it is important to take this factor into account when measuring the diffusion coefficient which depends on η according to the Stokes-Einstein relation

where kB is the Boltzmann’s constant, T is the temperature and R is the particle radius.

Cheng49 proposed an empirical formula, expressing the viscosity of glycerol/water mixture as a function of two variables: the mass concentration of glycerol and temperature T. The viscosity η of a mixture is related to those of its components, water (ηw) and glycerol (ηg), as

where α varies as a function of as

The temperature dependence of the coefficients a and b and the viscosities ηw and ηg are determined empirically and chosen to comply with experimental data49.

Pointing fluctuations

In order to model the influence of spatial instabilities of the X-ray beam, we performed two-dimensional simulations of diffusing spherical particles. 400 spherical particles were placed on lattice points in a 1500 × 1500 pixels grid. To obtain a disordered sample, a sequence of random movements was performed. In each step, the Voronoi tesselation was calculated for the system and every single particle was moved randomly inside its Voronoi cell. After ten repetitions no positional order is present, see Fig. 4(a). The area fraction of the particles was about 0.012.

The degree of coherence of the incoming beam was set to βs = 0.79 ± 0.09, following our previous results25. For each simulation step of Brownian motion, every particle moves independently by a randomly oriented step following a Gaussian distribution of step lengths. Beam displacements were simulated from a stable beam (σ = 0) up to σ = b, where b denotes the beamsize. Speckle patterns were calculated after each step from a region of interest representing a square sized beam with size b, see Fig. 4(a). Beam movement was modeled by moving the region of interest by Gaussian distributed step lengths in x and y-direction for each simulations step, respectively. Analogously, beam size changes were simulated by changing the size of the region of interest by a Gaussian distributed value in x and y-direction for each simulations step, respectively. These distributions resemble the beam stability found experimentally upstream the KB system38. Afterwards, g2-functions were extracted. This was repeated for different standard deviations σ of the Gaussian distribution function, for each σ the simulation was repeated 24 times to obtain a reliable statistics. Other distributions, e.g., exponentially or Gamma-distributed moving vectors, resulted in similar results, with slightly shifted contrast values.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Lehmkühler, F. et al. Sequential Single Shot X-ray Photon Correlation Spectroscopy at the SACLA Free Electron Laser. Sci. Rep. 5, 17193; doi: 10.1038/srep17193 (2015).

References

  1. Grübel, G. & Zontone, F. Correlation Spectroscopy with Coherent X-rays. J. Alloys. Compd. 362, 3–11 (2004).

  2. Grübel, G., Stephenson, G. B., Gutt, C., Sinn, H. & Tschentscher, T. XPCS at the European X-ray free electron laser facility. Nucl. Instr. Methods B 262, 357–367 (2007).

  3. Weckert, E. The potential of future light sources to explore the structure and function of matter. IUCrJ 2, 230–245 (2015).

  4. Shpyrko, O. G. et al. Direct measurements of antiferromagnetic domain fluctuations. Nature 447, 68–71 (2007).

  5. Leheny, R. L. XPCS: Nanoscale motion and rheology. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 17, 3–12 (2012).

  6. Sinha, S. K., Jian, Z. & Lurio, L. B. X-ray Photon Correlation Spectroscopy Studies of Surfaces and Thin Films. Adv. Mat. 26, 7764–7785 (2014).

  7. Caronna, C., Chushkin, Y., Madsen, A. & Cupane, A. Dynamics of Nanoparticles in a Supercooled Liquid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 055702 (2008).

  8. Guo, H. Y. et al. Entanglement-Controlled Subdiffusion of Nanoparticles within Concentrated Polymer Solutions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 055901 (2012).

  9. Conrad, H. et al. Correlated heterogeneous dynamics in glass-forming polymers. Phys. Rev. E 91, 042309 (2015).

  10. Grübel, G., Madsen, A. & Robert, A. X-ray Photon Correlation Spectroscopy (XPCS). In: Soft-Matter Characterization, edited by R. Borsali & R. Pecora, pp. 953–995, Berlin: Springer (2008).

  11. Sutton, M. A review of X-ray intensity fluctuation spectroscopy. C. R. Phys. 9, 657–667 (2008).

  12. Shpyrko, O. G. X-ray photon correlation spectroscopy. J. Synch. Rad. 21, 1057–1064 (2014).

  13. Roseker, W. et al. Performance of a picosecond x-ray delay line unit at 8.39 keV. Opt. Lett. 34, 1768–1770 (2009).

  14. Gutt, C. et al. Measuring temporal speckle correlations at ultrafast X-ray sources. Opt. Exp. 17, 55–61 (2009).

  15. Roseker, W. et al. Development of a hard X-ray delay line for X-ray photon correlation spectroscopy and jitter-free pump-probe experiments at X-ray free-electron laser sources. J. Synch. Rad. 18, 481–491 (2011).

  16. Roseker, W. et al. Hard X-ray delay line for X-ray photon correlation spectroscopy and jitter-free pump-probe experiments at LCLS. Proc. SPIE 8502, 85040I (2012).

  17. Osaka, T. et al. Development of split-delay X-ray optics using Si(220) crystals at SACLA. Proc. SPIE 9210, 9213009 (2014).

  18. Roling, S. et al. Design of an X-ray split- and delay-unit for the European XFEL. Proc. SPIE 8504, 850407 (2012).

  19. Emma, P. et al. First lasing and operation of an å ngstrom-wavelength free-electron laser. Nature Photon. 4, 641–647 (2010).

  20. Ishikawa, T. et al. A compact X-ray free-electron laser emitting in the sub-Ångström region Nature Photon. 6, 540–544 (2012).

  21. Yabashi, M., Tanaka, H. & Ishikawa, T. Overview of the SACLA facility. J. Synch. Rad. 22, 10.1107/S1600577515004658 (2015).

  22. Vartanyants, I. A. et al. Coherence Properties of Individual Femtosecond Pulses on an X-ray Free-Electron Laser. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 144801 (2011).

  23. Gutt, C. et al. Single Shot Spatial and Temporal Coherence Properties of the SLAC Linac Coherent Light Source in the Hard X-ray Regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 024801 (2012).

  24. Lee, S. et al. Single shot speckle and coherence analysis of the hard X-ray free electron laser LCLS. Opt. Exp. 21, 24647 (2013).

  25. Lehmkühler, F. et al. Single Shot Coherence Properties of the Free-Electron Laser SACLA in the Hard X-ray Regime. Sci. Rep. 4, 5234 (2014).

  26. Alonso-Mori, A. et al. The X-ray Correlation Spectroscopy instrument at the Linac Coherent Light Source. J. Synch. Rad. 22, 508–513 (2015).

  27. Leitner, M., Sepiol, B., Stadler, L. M., Pfau, B. & Vogl, G. Atomic diffusion studied with coherent X-ray. Nature Mat. 8, 717–720 (2009).

  28. Ruta, B. et al. Atomic-scale relaxation dynamics and aging in a metallic glass probed by X-ray photon correlation spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 165701 (2012).

  29. Ruta, B. et al. Revealing the fast atomic motion of network glasses. Nat. Commun. 5, 3939 (2014).

  30. Ross, M., Stana, M., Leitner, M. & Sepiol B. Direct observation of atomic network migration in glass. New J. Phys. 16, 093942 (2014).

  31. Carnis, J. et al. Demonstration of Feasibility of X-ray Free Electron Laser Studies of Dynamics of Nanoparticles in Entangled Polymer Melts. Sci. Rep. 4, 6017 (2014).

  32. Inubushi, Y. et al. Determination of the Pulse Duration of an X-ray Free Electron Laser Using Highly Resolved Single-Shot Spectra. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 144801 (2012).

  33. Nugent, K. A. Coherent methods in the X-ray sciences. Advances in Physics 59, 1 (2010).

  34. Goodman, J. W. Speckle Phenomena in Optics (Roberts and Company, Greenwood Village, 2007).

  35. Sutton, M. http://www.physics.mcgill.ca/~mark/coherence/yorick/highqbeta.pdf (2007), date of access:04/29/2015.

  36. Abernathy, D. L. et al. Small-Angle X-ray Scattering Using Coherent Undulator Radiation at the ESRF. J. Synch. Rad. 5, 37–47 (1998).

  37. Hruszkewycz, S. O. et al. High Contrast X-ray Speckle from Atomic-Scale Order in Liquids and Glasses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 185502 (2012).

  38. Tono, K. et al. Beamline, experimental stations and photon beam diagnostics for the hard X-ray free electron laser of SACLA. New J. Phys. 15, 083035 (2013).

  39. Rutishauser, S. et al. Exploring the wavefront of hard X-ray free-electron laser radiation. Nature Comm. 3, 947 (2012).

  40. Stöber, W., Fink, A. & Bohn, E. Controlled growth of monodisperse silica spheres in the micron size range. J. Coll. Int. Sci. 26, 62–69 (1968).

  41. Fischer, B., Autenrieth, T. & Wagner, J. Highly Charged Inorganic-Organic Colloidal Core-Shell Particles. Langmuir 26, 6201–6205 (2010).

  42. Song, C. et al. Multiple application X-ray imaging chamber for single-shot diffraction experiments with femtosecond X-ray laser pulses. J. Appl. Cryst. 47, 188–197 (2014).

  43. Kameshima, T. et al. Development of an X-ray Pixel Detector with Multi-port Charge-Coupled Device for X-ray Free-Electron Laser Experiments. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85, 033110 (2014).

  44. Sikorski, M. et al. A graphical user interface for real-time analysis of XPCS using HPC. Nucl. Instrum. Meth Phys. Res. A 649, 234–236 (2011).

  45. Yumoto, H. et al. Micro-focusing of hard X-ray free electron laser radiation using Kirkpatrick-Baez mirror system. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 425, 052022 (2013).

  46. Balderas-López, J. A., Mandelis, A. & Garcia, J. A. Thermal-wave resonator cavity design and measurements of the thermal diffusivity of liquids. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 71, 2933 (2000).

  47. Sheely, M. L. Glycerol Viscosity Tables. Ind. Eng. Chem. 9, 1060–1064 (1932).

  48. Segur, J. B. & Oberstar, H. E. Viscosity of Glycerol and Its Aqueous Solutions. Ind. Eng. Chem. 43, 2117–2120 (1951).

  49. Cheng, N.-S. Formula for the Viscosity of a Glycerol-Water Mixture. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47, 3285–3288 (2008).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Michael Walther for technical support, Hasan Yavas for proof-reading of the manuscript and the Hamburg Centre for Ultrafast Imaging (CUI) for financial support. The Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, is an Office of Science User Facility operated for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science by Stanford University. The XFEL experiments were performed at the BL3 of SACLA with the approval of the Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute (JASRI) (Proposal No. 2013A8010). Parts of this research were carried out at beamline P10 at the light source PETRA III at DESY, a member of the Helmholtz Association (HGF).

Author information

F.L., W.R., M.Y., T.I. and G.G. designed research. T.K., K.T. and M.Y. prepared the experimental setup and supervised the experimental procedures. B.F. synthesized and prepared the samples. F.L., B.F., M.A.S., K.T., T.K., M. Sikorski, S.S., J.G., M.C., S.N., A.R., C.G. and G.G. performed the experiment. P.K. wrote the XPCS analysis routines with support from M.Sprung, W.R. and F.L. B.F. and M.Sprung performed the pre-characterization of the samples. F.L. and P.K. analyzed and modeled the data and performed the simulations. F.L. wrote the manuscript text. All authors reviewed and discussed the manuscript.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lehmkühler, F., Kwaśniewski, P., Roseker, W. et al. Sequential Single Shot X-ray Photon Correlation Spectroscopy at the SACLA Free Electron Laser. Sci Rep 5, 17193 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17193

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.