Abstract
The interaction between intersubband resonances (ISRs) and metamaterial microcavities constitutes a strongly coupled system where new resonances form that depend on the coupling strength. Here we present experimental evidence of strong coupling between the cavity resonance of a terahertz metamaterial and the ISR in a high electron mobility transistor (HEMT) structure. The device is electrically switched from an uncoupled to a strongly coupled regime by tuning the ISR with epitaxially grown transparent gate. The asymmetric potential in the HEMT structure enables ultrawide electrical tuning of ISR, which is an order of magnitude higher as compared to an equivalent square well. For a single heterojunction with a triangular confinement, we achieve an avoided splitting of 0.52 THz, which is a significant fraction of the bare intersubband resonance at 2 THz.
Introduction
Ultrastrong lightmatter interaction is one of the key aspects of quantum photonics and has been a subject of great interest for superconducting qubits^{1,2}, atomic^{3,4,5} and quantum dot^{6} systems. In addition to electronic and optical frequencies, strongly coupled lightmatter systems can also be obtained for quantum well intersubband transitions coupled to midinfrared^{7} and THz^{8,9} resonators. When a transition is strongly coupled to a cavity resonance, the bare frequencies of the uncoupled system shift to new frequencies. The frequency shift depends on the strength of the coupling and can be explained in terms of periodic exchange of energy through vacuum Rabi oscillations^{10,11} or coupling between the oscillators in a strongly dispersive system^{12}. Since the frequency shift is proportional to the lightmatter interaction, switchable and tunable strong coupling is of interest for filters and modulators.
Artificial structures of subwavelength sizes with novel electromagnetic properties, commonly known as metamaterials (MMs)^{13,14,15}, can be used to create resonators to study lightmatter interactions. Recently, ultrastrong coupling experiments have been performed, where the cyclotron resonance of the two dimensional electron gas (2DEG) is coupled to THz MM resonators^{16,17,18,19,20}. The transitions between the Landau levels are brought into resonance with the MMs by tuning the magnetic field. However, electrical tunability is more preferable for devices. In 2012, Gabbay et al.^{21} modeled the coupling of MMs to electrically tunable ISRs in a square well for midinfrared frequencies. These devices are later demonstrated experimentally by Benz et al.^{22,23,24}. In order to excite the intersubband transitions, the incident electric field should have a component parallel to the growth direction. For an inductorcapacitor (LC) MM resonator^{14,25,26}, the electric field in the capacitor region is perpendicular to the growth direction. However, due to local bending of the electric field on the capacitor edges, the MM mode can be strongly coupled to ISRs in multiple quantum wells^{27,28,29,30}. High electron mobility transistor (HEMT) structures, on the other hand, form the building blocks of most modern highspeed electronic circuits. Monolithic integration of MMs with HEMT permits amplitude modulation of THz radiation at MM resonances up to a few MHz^{31} in the linear lightmatter regime. Such integrated structures not only show potential application towards electrically tunable THz devices, but also in the ultrastrong lightmatter interaction regime.
In this contribution, we demonstrate strong coupling of ISR in a single heterojunction formed in a HEMT structure to a THz MM. This is achieved by electrically tuning the ISR with a complementary doped epitaxial gate^{32}. The asymmetric potential at the heterojunction enables wide tuning of the ISRs in comparison to a square well. The low vacuum bandoffset of the complementary epitaxial gate further enhances the electrical tunability. In addition, the triangular well has greater oscillator strength. This allows the ultrastrong lightmatter interaction regime to occur between a single heterojunction with a triangular confinement and a MM resonator.
Results
Designing the MetamaterialHEMT Device
Intersubband transitions in semiconductor quantum well can be designed to cover the wide infrared region of the electromagnetic spectrum^{33,34}. The device is based on intersubband transition in 2DEG, formed in a GaAs/Al_{x}Ga_{1−x}As heterojunction of a HEMT structure, Fig. 1(a). The HEMT consists of a heterostructure that is deltadoped in the Al_{x}Ga_{1−x}As layer, 50 nm from the heterojunction. The electrons from the deltadoped donors diffuse to the GaAs layer. This results in the presence of a strong builtin space charge fields between the carriers in the GaAs and donors in the Al_{x}Ga_{1−x}As. The potential near the heterojunction can be approximated to a triangular potential with a constant slope in GaAs layer and a vertical barrier from the GaAs/Al_{x}Ga_{1−x}As conduction bandoffset. The electronic motion perpendicular to the surface is quantized, resulting in the formation of quasitwodimensionalsubbands. By varying the external bias, the slope of the triangular potential along with the transition energies can be tuned. In contrast to a square well with abrupt barriers on either side, a triangular well with gradual slope (on the GaAs side) will have a much greater effect on tuning the subband spacings by electrical bias. The external bias is applied by making contacts to the 2DEG and a heavily doped ptype region on the surface, which forms an epitaxial gate. The complementary doping of the gate leads to a low vacuum bandoffset (typically 0.5 eV), thus a lower depletion of carriers and hence a wide voltage tunability of the device (or intersubband energies). The thickness of the epitaxial gate is only 20 nm, which is much less than the skin depth. This makes the epitaxial gate transparent to THz radiation. Further details on the layer sequence of the sample are described in the methods section.
Arrays of doublesided Au splitring resonators (SRR) are deposited on top of the device, shown in Fig. 1(b,c). The SRRs have subwavelength sizes and are designed to have a cavity resonance comparable to the first intersubband transition in the 2DEG. The resonators are similar to electricalinductorcapacitor (ELC) circuit, where the inductive regions correspond to the loops of the SRRs and the capacitive regions correspond to the gaps in the loops of the SRRs. As shown in Fig. 1(d), the doublesided SRRs consists of two single SRRs that are mirror images of each other for reflections along the central metal line^{16}. The current travels in a clockwise direction for one of the single SRRs and in anticlockwise for the other. Thus the induced magnetic fields from the two SRRs will average to zero and the double SRR will only couple to external electric fields through the capacitive regions.
Finite difference time domain (FDTD) simulations using a commercial software package (CST microwave studio) is used to calculate the electric field distribution and the frequency response of the MM modes. The simulations are carried out for a single unit cell with periodic boundary condition in x−y plane and open boundaries (with spaces) in z plane. The electric field direction of the incident signal is polarized along y direction. A schematic of the arrangement used for electromagnetic simulation along with the dimensions of MM are shown in Fig. 2(e). The inplane field distribution is strongly enhanced over subwavelength volumes around the capacitive regions of the doublesided SRRs, Fig. 2(a,b). Intersubband transitions only couple to electric fields polarized in the growth direction perpendicular to the surface. Although the fields between the capacitor sections are predominantly inplane, there is a significant outof plane field from fringing effects (see Fig. 2(c)) on the surface^{35,36}. Figure 2(d) shows the electric field distribution, in the growth direction along the cut, indicated by the white line in Fig. 2(a,b). All field simulations are performed at 2 THz. This frequency corresponds to the intersubband transition from the ground to the first excited state in the heterojunction of the HEMT structure. The equivalent electrostatic capacitance is an important parameter of the microcavities, which play a key role in strong lightmatter coupling. This is due to the fact that the Rabi frequency is directly proportional to the equivalent capacitance^{37}. The longer capacitive arm (9 μm, see Fig. 2(e)) of the MMs used ensures larger coverage of the heterojunction, which enables more electrons to participate in the coupling. Moreover, it is also observed that the electric filed in the zdirection is significantly enhanced. While the coupling strength has only a very weak dependence on the actual geometry of the MM design^{38}, the number the quantum well in the structure play a significant role. Since a single heterojunction (with a triangular confinement potential) is employed in our integrated device, a greater coverage and strong electric fields in the growth direction become essential, which are met by the use of current MM design.
2DEG Intersubband Resonances
In order to characterize the energy eigenvalues of the 2DEG confined in a triangular potential well, a selfconsistent SchrödingerPoisson equation is solved using the 1D Poisson solver^{39}. The solution is carried out for different bias applied to the gate. The dependence of the intersubband spacings of two resonances, and are plotted as a function of the electric field strength in Fig. 3(a), where E_{0}, E_{1} and E_{2} corresponds to the energies of ground, first and second subbands respectively. By tuning the gate voltage, the confinement potential and hence the electric field strength, F can be altered. Under the triangular well approximation^{40}, the shift of the ISR to higher energies is given by^{41}:
where i (0, 1, 2, …) represent the indices of the subbands, m^{*} is the effective mass of electrons in GaAs and e is the electronic charge. The normalized oscillator strengths, f_{ij}, are calculated from the transition matrix elements, , corresponding to the ISRs by using the following relation:
where , with ^{41}. The quantity, L is defined as the electric length, given by . The normalized oscillator strength for transition is calculated to be 0.73 while that of transition is 0.12. According to the sum rule, the normalized oscillator strengths of all transitions sum up to 1, which indicates transition to higher levels are very weak. Under the framework of triangular well approximation, the oscillator strengths are calculated to be independent of the electric field strength (Fig. 3(a)). This is unique compared to that of the square potential well as shown by Benz et al.^{23}, where there is a small contribution of the quantumconfined Stark shift^{42} to the oscillator strengths in the presence of external bias. Due to asymmetric confinement, the ISRs can be tuned with a magnitude one order higher as compared to an equivalent square well. For a triangular well with an effective thickness of 20 nm, if the electric field is tuned by 4.5 × 10^{4} V/cm, the ISR () can be tuned by 35 meV, while for an equivalent square well for the same change in electric field the ISR is tuned only by 3 meV. The experimentally observed ISRs are blueshifted due to resonant screening from higher subbands, also known as the depolarization effect^{40,41,43} and is explained in the methods section.
Characterization of metamaterials
The MMs are characterized by THz timedomain spectroscopy (TDS) at room temperature under purged conditions, to avoid the water absorption lines. The experimental details of the setup are explained separately in the methods section. At room temperature the thermal energy, k_{B}T (=25 meV), is greater than the subband energy spacings. This result in the occupation of higher subbands, which consequently prevents us from observing the ISR () from the 2DEG. Hence under this condition, the response from the sample is purely due to MMs. The transmission is measured for two orientations of the MMs, Fig. 3(b). In the inset, the corresponding spectra are shown. The electric field of the THz radiation couples to the MMs only when they are oriented parallel to the optical table, marked as Metamaterial_0° in Fig. 3(b). The normalized transmission is plotted by dividing the transmitted intensity with respect to the MM orientation when the fields do not couple. Two strong resonances are observed in the transmission spectrum at 0.34 THz and 1.71 THz. The quality factors of the resonance frequencies at 0.34 THz and 1.71 THz are found to be 0.58 and 2.01 respectively. These resonances have different origin described as follows: The lower frequency at 0.34 THz is due to the LC equivalent circuit where the current circulates in the inductive part and the field is concentrated between the capacitor plates. The resonance at 1.71 THz is due to the half wave resonance^{44} arising from the sides of MM. There are additional losses from the epitaxial layer, damping and change in the effective dielectric constant of the layers with the change in temperature. From the quality factor of the resonance at 1.71 THz, we estimated the losses to be around 0.85 THz. On cooling the sample, the cavity resonance will be blue shifted according to^{45}: , where ω_{0} is the bare cavity resonance without any losses, ω_{r} is the resonance of the MMs including losses and γ is proportional to the combined effect of ohmic losses in the metal and radiative damping in the cavity. The resulting resonance frequency without losses is calculated to be 1.9 THz, which is very close to the observed resonance at 4.2 K.
Charging spectroscopy of the 2DEG
The charging of the 2DEG subbands is observed by capacitancevoltage spectroscopy at 4.2 K, shown in Fig. 4(a). The change in capacitance between the top gate and the bottom 2DEG layer is measured as a function of the gate voltage by applying DC + AC voltage to the gate and measuring the AC component of the current across the ohmic. The steep increase of capacitance in the voltage ranging from −0.6 V to −0.4 V indicates that the 2DEG layer is filled with charge carriers (green curve). When the sample is illuminated with farinfrared (FIR) broadband source (Hgarc lamp), the threshold voltage shifts more to negative values. This is due to the activation of the donorexchange (DX) centres^{46}. As the sample is illuminated longer, more donor atoms from the δdoped AlGaAs layer ionize and less bias is required to charge the 2DEG subbands, resulting in the shift of charging slope to more negative biases. When the charging spectrum does not shift any more (shown by the blue curve), a steady state is reached. The activation of the DXcentres is a result of residual near bandgap illumination (after filtering by black polyethylene window) from the FIR source. The blue shaded region in Fig. 4(a) marks the voltage range where densitychopped infrared transmission measurements are performed. The SchrödingerPoisson equations are solved over the shaded voltage range, corresponding to the electric field strengths plotted in Fig. 3(a).
Strong coupling of metamaterials with 2DEG
An FTIR transmission setup with a rapid scan BRUKER IFS113V interferometer is used for the density chopped infrared transmission spectroscopy to observe the strong coupling of the MM cavity resonance with the 2DEG ISRs. As observed in the charging spectrum, at a bias of −2 V, the conduction band of the 2DEG is pulled above the Fermi level and hence completely depleted of carriers. This is used as the reference voltage in the choppingscheme at which sample transmission is recorded. The gate voltage is then increased to −1.55 V, where only one subband is below the Fermi level and corresponding transmission measurements are performed. The voltages are changed alternatively and the respective spectra are coadded and averaged over time. This is repeated for several gate voltages, keeping the reference voltage same. All normalized transmission spectra are collectively plotted in a contourplot. At first, the bare intersubband resonance is characterized in a sample, which does not have the MM layer on top. This is shown in Fig. 4(b). In order to access the intersubband transitions, the sample is tilted at an angle to obey the polarization selection rule. On increasing the gate bias from −1.55 V to −1.35 V, the transition frequency from the ground subband to the first excited subband increases from 1.6 THz to 2.5 THz. It can be seen that tuning the gate voltage by 200 mV, the intersubband transition is shifted by nearly 1 THz. The possibility of wide electrical tuning results from the asymmetry in the triangular confinement potential at the GaAsAlGaAs heterojunction. For the sample with MMs on top, it is observed that at low temperature, the cavity resonance shifted to 2.12 THz due to lower losses as compared to the room temperature measurements. This is a favorable situation since the cavity resonance now lies within the tuning range of the intersubband transitions. Fig. 5(a) shows the contour plot of the normalized transmission spectra for the integrated device. The Qfactor of the MM resonance has dramatically improved to a value of 16.9. At V_{g} = −1.425 V, a clear splitting of the ISR can be observed when the ISR (ω_{01}) of the 2DEG crosses the resonance of the MMs at 2.12 THz. The width of the splitting is found to be 0.52 THz. Two normalized transmission spectra at V_{g} = −1.45 V and V_{g} = −1.40 V, shown by the white line in Fig. 5(a) are plotted in Fig. 5(b,c). The spectra are smoothed in order to carry out the spectral deconvolution. Three peaks, marked as ω_{01}, ω_{meta} and ω_{02} can be seen corresponding to the points marked in Fig. 5(a). As described before, the ISRs are blue shifted by 1.2 meV as compared to theoretical values plotted in Fig. 3(a), due to the resonant screening from the higher subbands. It is observed that at V_{g} = −2 V, not only the 2DEG channel gets completely depleted of charge carriers but also the response from the capacitive element of the MMs is screened due to charges in the epitaxial layer. By applying bias on the gate below the MM, a significant modulation of the intensity (or amplitude) of the cavity resonance is observed^{31,47}. Thus in our chopping scheme, the MM resonance at 2.12 THz disappears for biases lower than −1.45 V and begins to appear for biases higher than −1.425 V. In our experiments, we limit the bias applied on the gate to −1.3 V. Since with increasing bias the slope of the triangular confinement becomes steeper, the second subband is pulled below the Fermi level, which makes the transition scheme different, which is not desirable.
Discussion
The 2DEG and MMs in our device can be considered as two oscillators, one of which has a fixed frequency and the frequency of the other oscillator (2DEG) is tuned by the gate voltage. When the frequencies of both the oscillators are similar, they form a coupled system and an anticrossing phenomenon is observed. This results in a periodic transfer of energy between the 2DEG and the microcavity through vacuum Rabi oscillations, which is proportional to the splitting at the anticrossing point. Using the common oscillator model, described by Gabbay et al.^{21}, the strength of the coupling is found to be directly proportional to the strength of the splitting, described in the methods section. The quantity, Ω, defined as the coupling strength is given by:
where Ω_{0} is the bare coupling strength, ξ_{meta} and ξ_{10} represent the losses in the metamaterials and ISRs and is proportional to the linewidths of the respective transitions. The coupling strength in our experiment is found to be 0.26 THz, while the bare coupling strength is calculated to be 0.28 THz. There is no significant change in the two coupling strengths. The ratio of the splitting to the sum of fullwidth at half maximum of both the resonances, is found to be greater than one. The normalized coupling ratio in our experiment is found to be 0.13, which is a significant fraction of the intersubband transition energy. Interestingly, in our experiment the bare cavity resonance is present in the range of voltages where the coupling regime lies and beyond. The presence of the uncoupled resonator signal at the anticrossing point has been reported before in atomcavity system^{48} and its solidstate analogues such as quantum dotcavity systems^{6,49}. While in the atomcavity system this is a result of the fluctuation in the number of atoms in the cavity, in case of dotcavity systems it is due to the fluctuation of the emitter energy over time. Following a similar chain of arguments, our system is a solidstate analogue where the quantum well replaces the quantum dot and the metamaterials replace the photonic crystal^{6} or Fabry Pérot cavity^{49}. The fluctuation in the emitter energy results from the fluctuation of the gate voltage since the frequency of the intersubband transitions depends very sensitively on the applied gate voltage and hence on the carriers. This results in the observation of the third peak from the cavity in the anticrossing point (see 5(a)), when the two systems are strongly coupled. For higher voltage (above −1.375 V) regime, the presence of cavity mode is simply due to the fact that the two oscillators in our device are no longer coupled and the two resonances appear independently; while the intersubband transition keeps shifting to higher energies (due to quantum confined Stark effect), the cavity resonance is fixed. It is to be noted that a difference between the spectra at two different gate biases is measured. Thus a stronger MM cavity mode represents a change in the absorption strength of the MMs with change of bias. Besides, the presence of charges with increased bias will also change the quality factor of the cavity. Due to the use of a single heterojunction, the low contrast ratio hinders the simultaneous observation of both polaritonic modes at the same gate bias. A double high electron mobility transistor structure, one inverted with respect to the other can be envisaged. With top and backgates, the structure can be tuned from either side, which would enhance the contrast of the resonances observed. Of course care should be taken to design the structure identically with the same ground to first excited state transition energies.
In conclusion, we show strong coupling of the 2DEG ISR in a heterostructure with a triangular confining potential to the cavity resonance of a THz MM by driving the device from an uncoupled state to a strongly coupled state via electrical tuning of ISR. Due to asymmetric confinement potential, the tuning of the ISR is found to be one order of magnitude higher in comparison to an identical square well. The use of epitaxial gate proved to be advantageous for the use of direct MMs and consequently tune the ISR at the same time. With a proper chopping scheme, we successfully demonstrated that the measurement could be performed in one integrated sample without the need of additional reference sample. This is one of the remarkable features of our device. Moreover, we succeeded to achieve ultrastrong lightmatter interaction by employing a single heterojunction of a high electron mobility transistor structure. The vacuum Rabi frequency is 13% of the bare intersubband resonance frequency, which is a high value if we consider that this is achieved only by electrical tuning of the intersubband transitions in a single heterojunction with an asymmetric triangular confinement potential.
Methods
Sample Design
The sample is grown on a semiinsulating GaAs (100) substrate by molecular beam epitaxy. At first, 20 periods of AlAs/GaAs (5 nm/5 nm) short period superlattice (SPS) are grown to trap segregating impurities at the interfaces and to smoothen the surface for growth. A 650 nm thick GaAs layer is grown, followed by a 50 nm Al_{0.34}Ga_{0.66}As spacer layer. This is followed by a Siδ doping and then a 45 nm Al_{0.34}Ga_{0.66}As layer. Another 6 periods of SPS layer comprising of 1 nm GaAs and 3 nm AlAs are grown, capped by a 13 nm GaAs layer above which the epitaxial gate^{32} is grown. The epitaxial gate has a 15 nm thick carbondoped GaAs layer and 30 periods of carbonδ doped and 0.5 nm carbondoped GaAs layers, which lead to an effective carrier density of N_{A} = 2 × 10^{19} cm^{−3}. To establish a contact with the 2DEG layer, 162 nm below the surface, the corners of a 5 mm × 6 mm sample are first etched down by 100 nm (Fig. 1(b)) and then indium is diffused in a reaction chamber in an inert atmosphere of argon and nitrogen. The sample is then mounted on a chip carrier and wires are bonded by wedgebonding. The structures are processed on the epitaxial gate, shown schematically in Fig. 1(b), by conventional UVphotolithography, evaporation of Cr/Au (10/200 nm) and liftoff technique. Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) of the MMs and a wire bonding are shown in Fig. 1(c,d).
THz time domain spectroscopy
A Ti:Sa laser with 80 fs pulse duration (centre wavelength of 800 nm) and a repetition rate of 80 MHz is used to generate THz radiation by exciting an interdigitated photoconductive antenna processed on a GaAs substrate at an applied DC bias. The experiment is performed in transmission geometry with a NIRpower of 200 mW on the antenna. The detection is based on electrooptic sampling of the THz electric field by employing a birefringent, 2 mm thick ZnTe crystal. The electric field component of the source is in a direction parallel to the optical table. Two 90° offaxis parabolic mirrors are used to collimate and focus the THz beam on the sample, which is fixed on a rotation mount. Another two parabolic mirrors are used to collect the signal from the sample and focus it on the ZnTe crystal. The transmission measurements are performed to observe the response of the metamaterials alone in the device under purged conditions.
Oscillator Strengths and Depolarization Shifts
Under the triangular well approximation, the intersubband energy edges, E_{i}, are directly proportional to F^{2/3}, where F is the electric field strength. Now the oscillator strength for the transition between two subbands in a triangular potential well is proportional to the square of the matrix elements, which in turn is proportional to the square of the electric length, L. The electric length is inversely proportional to F^{1/3}. This implies that the oscillator strength does not depend on the field strength in a triangular well and is a constant given by:
where, ^{41}. For i = 0 and j = 1, f_{01} = 0.73 and for i = 0 and j = 2, f_{02} = 0.12. Taking in to account the allowed transitions to higher subbands (j = 3, 4, …), the total oscillator strength, , sums up to 1. The normalized energy eigenfunctions for the ground and the first excited intersubbands under triangular confinement, are given by^{41}:
where, N_{i} are the normalization constants given by Ai′(t_{i}) and . Including the resonant screening effects, the intersubband energies are blue shifted by
where α_{11} is the depolarization factor, which according to Ando^{50} is given by , where n_{2d} is the 2D carrier density; ε is the dielectric constant of GaAs; ε_{0} is the permittivity of free space. is the energy spacing corresponding to the transition, and the overlap factor, S_{11} has the dimensions of length and is given by^{50}:
The carrier density is however not a fixed value and changes with the change in bias. Besides the bias also changes the slope of the confinement thus changing the overlapintegral (S_{11}). At a bias of −1.4 V, corresponding to a carrier density of 2 × 10^{11} cm^{−2}, the depolarization shift is calculated to be 1.2 meV. The influence of resonant screening becomes important when the level spacings are smaller and the carrier densities are high.
Coupling Strength
The system is assumed to be comprised of two oscillators that are tuned from uncoupled to strongly coupled regime by tuning the ISR of the 2DEG with an external gate bias, making use of quantumconfined Stark effect. Following the model of coupled oscillators, as developed by Gabbay et al.,^{21} the coupling between the two resonators can be described by a simple 2 × 2 matrix:
where ω_{10}, ω_{meta} are the resonances and ξ_{10}, ξ_{meta} are the damping factors corresponding to ISR and metamaterials; Ω_{0} is the bare coupling strength of the oscillators. The matrix can be diagonalized to get the upper and lower eigenvalues of the coupled system as:
Subtracting the frequencies, we obtain:
At the anticrossing point, both the resonators start oscillating with equal and real frequencies, the coupling strength, Ω, can be expressed as:
From the two (upper and lower) branches of the transitions, the coupling strength, Ω, is found to be 0.26 THz. The damping factors corresponding to the resonances are ξ_{meta} = 0.13 THz and ξ_{10} = 0.23 THz. The bare coupling strength, Ω_{0}, is calculated to be 0.28 THz which similar to the coupling strength.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Pal, S. et al. Ultrawide electrical tuning of light matter interaction in a high electron mobility transistor structure. Sci. Rep. 5, 16812; doi: 10.1038/srep16812 (2015).
References
Wallraff, A. et al. Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics. Nature 431, 162 (2004).
Macha, P. et al. Implementation of a quantum metamaterial using superconducting qubits. Nat Commun 5, 5146 (2014).
Ye, J., Vernooy, D. W. & Kimble, H. J. Trapping of single atoms in cavity qed. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4987 (1999).
Kimble, H. J. The quantum internet. Nature 453, 1023 (2008).
McKeever, J., Boca, A., Boozer, A. D., Buck, J. R. & Kimble, H. J. Experimental realization of a oneatom laser in the regime of strong coupling. Nature 425, 268 (2003).
Hennessy, K. et al. Quantum nature of a strongly coupled single quantum dotcavity system. Nature 445, 896 (2007).
Dini, D., Köhler, R., Tredicucci, A., Biasiol, G. & Sorba, L. Microcavity polariton splitting of intersubband transitions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 116401 (2003).
Todorov, Y. et al. Strong lightmatter coupling in subwavelength metaldielectric microcavities at terahertz frequencies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 186402 (2009).
Todorov, Y. et al. Ultrastrong lightmatter coupling regime with polariton dots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 196402 (2010).
Agarwal, G. S. Vacuumfield Rabi splittings in microwave absorption by Rydberg atoms in a cavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1732 (1984).
Agarwal, G. S. Vacuumfield Rabi oscillations of atoms in a cavity. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2, 480 (1985).
Zhu, Y. et al. Vacuum Rabi splitting as a feature of lineardispersion theory: Analysis and experimental observations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2499 (1990).
Chen, H.T. et al. A metamaterial solidstate terahertz phase modulator. Nat Photon 3, 148 (2009).
Linden, S. et al. Magnetic response of metamaterials at 100 terahertz. Science 306, 1351 (2004).
Yen, T. J. et al. Terahertz magnetic response from artificial materials. Science 303, 1494 (2004).
Scalari, G. et al. Ultrastrong coupling of the Cyclotron transition of a 2D electron gas to a THz metamaterial. Science 335, 1323 (2012).
Scalari, G. et al. Ultrastrong lightmatter coupling at terahertz frequencies with split ring resonators and interLandau level transitions. J. Appl. Phys. 113, 136510 (2013).
Maissen, C. et al. Ultrastrong coupling in the near field of complementary splitring resonators. Phys. Rev. B 90, 205309 (2014).
Scalari, G. et al. Superconducting complementary metasurfaces for THz ultrastrong lightmatter coupling. New Journal of Physics 16, 033005 (2014).
Maissen, C., Scalari, G., Beck, M. & Faist, J. Continuously tunable ultrastrong lightmatter interaction. Proc. SPIE9361, Ultrafast Phenomena and Nanophotonics XIX, 93610F (March 14, 2015); 10.1117/12.2079178.
Gabbay, A. & Brener, I. Theory and modeling of electrically tunable metamaterial devices using intersubband transitions in semiconductor quantum wells. Optics Express 20, 6584 (2012).
Benz, A. et al. Monolithic metallic nanocavities for strong lightmatter interaction to quantumwell intersubband excitations. Optics Express 21, 32572 (2013).
Benz, A., Montaño, I., Klem, J. F. & Brener, I. Tunable metamaterials based on voltage controlled strong coupling. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 263116 (2013).
Benz, A. et al. Strong coupling in the subwavelength limit using metamaterial nanocavities. Nat Commun 4, 2882 (2013).
Jeppesen, C., Mortensen, N. A. & Kristensen, A. Capacitance tuning of nanoscale splitring resonators. Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 193108 (2009).
Withayachumnankul, W. & Abbott, D. Metamaterials in the terahertz regime. IEEE Photonics Journal 1, 99 (2009).
Geiser, M. et al. Strong lightmatter coupling at terahertz frequencies at room temperature in electronic LC resonators. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 191107 (2010).
Dietze, D., Benz, A., Strasser, G., Unterrainer, K. & Darmo, J. Terahertz metaatoms coupled to a quantum well intersubband transition. Optics Express 19, 13700 (2011).
Geiser, M., Scalari, G., Castellano, F., Beck, M. & Faist, J. Room temperature terahertz polariton emitter. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 141118 (2012).
Dietze, D. et al. Ultrastrong coupling of intersubband plasmons and terahertz metamaterials. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 201106 (2013).
Shrekenhamer, D. et al. High speed terahertz modulation from metamaterials with embedded high electron mobility transistors. Optics Express 19, 9968 (2011).
Pal, S. et al. Infrared transmission spectroscopy of charge carriers in selfassembled InAs quantum dots under surface electric fields. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 26, 505801 (2014).
Craig, K. et al. Undressing a collective intersubband excitation in a quantum well. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2382 (1996).
Machhadani, H. et al. Intersubband absorption of cubic GaN/Al(Ga)N quantum wells in the nearinfrared to terahertz spectral range. Phys. Rev. B 83, 075313 (2011).
Shelton, D. J. et al. Effect of thin silicon dioxide layers on resonant frequency in infrared metamaterials. Optics Express 18, 1085 (2010).
Shelton, D. J. et al. Strong coupling between nanoscale metamaterials and phonons. Nano Lett. 11, 2104 (2011).
Benz, A., Campione, S., Klem, J. F., Sinclair, M. B. & Brener, I. Control of strong lightmatter coupling using the capacitance of metamaterial nanocavities. Nano Lett. 15, 1959 (2015).
Dietze, D., Unterrainer, K. & Darmo, J. Role of geometry for strong coupling in active terahertz metamaterials. Phys. Rev. B 87, 075324 (2013).
Snider, G. L., Tan, I.H. & Hu, E. L. Electron states in mesaetched onedimensional quantum well wires. J. Appl. Phys. 68, 2849 (1990).
Ando, T. Densityfunctional calculation of subband structure in accumulation and inversion layers. Phys. Rev. B 13, 3468 (1976).
Wieck, A. D. et al. Subbandlandaulevel coupling in GaAs/Ga1−xAlx As heterojunctions. Phys. Rev. B 39, 3785 (1989).
Bastard, G., Mendez, E. E., Chang, L. L. & Esaki, L. Variational calculations on a quantum well in an electric field. Phys. Rev. B 28, 3241 (1983).
Wieck, A. D., Bollweg, K., Merkt, U., Weimann, G. & Schlapp, W. Combined intersubbandcyclotron resonances in a GaAsGa1−xAlxAs heterojunction. Phys. Rev. B 38, 10158 (1988).
Padilla, W. J., Taylor, A. J., Highstrete, C., Lee, M. & Averitt, R. D. Dynamical electric and magnetic metamaterial response at terahertz frequencies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 107401 (2006).
Ginn, J., Shelton, D., Krenz, P., Lail, B. & Boreman, G. Altering infrared metamaterial performance through metal resonance damping. J. Appl. Phys. 105, 074304 (2009).
Mooney, P. M. Deep donor levels (DX centers) in III–V semiconductors. J. Appl. Phys. 67, R1 (1990).
Chen, H.T. et al. Active terahertz metamaterial devices. Nature 444, 597 (2006).
Childs, J. J., An, K., Otteson, M. S., Dasari, R. R. & Feld, M. S. Normal mode line shapes for atoms in standingwave optical resonators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2901 (1996).
Greuter, L., Starosielec, S., Kuhlmann, A. & Warburton, R. J. Towards highcooperativity strong coupling of a quantum dot in a tunable microcavity. Phys. Rev. B 92, 045302 (2015).
Ando, T. Intersubband optical transitions in a surface spacecharge layer. Solid State Communications 21, 133 (1977).
Acknowledgements
The work is financially supported by the BMBF Quantum communication program  Q.comH 16KIS0109 and BMBFQUIMP 16BQ1062 as well as Mercur Pr20130001. The authors would also like to acknowledge the DFH/UFA CDFA0506 NiceBochum and RUB Research School. S.P. and A.D.W. acknowledge gratefully IMPRSSurMat, MPIE DüsseldorfRUB Bochum. Additionally, A.D.W. and A.L. acknowledge support within the DFG SFB ICRC  TRR 160 Z1 project.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
S.P. and S.M. designed and fabricated the metamaterials and performed the FDTD simulations. S.P. performed electrical measurements and wrote the manuscript; S.P. and N.K. performed the FTIR measurements, instructed by A.D.W. H.N. and S.M. developed the setup for time domain spectroscopy and performed the measurements; N.K. performed the 2DEG simulations. S.R.V. and A.L. designed and grew the samples; S.S. took the SEM pictures; C.B. and U.K. prepared the chromemasks for metamaterials; A.D.W. and N.J. supervised the experiments. All authors have discussed the results and commented on the manuscript at all stages.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Pal, S., Nong, H., Markmann, S. et al. Ultrawide electrical tuning of light matter interaction in a high electron mobility transistor structure. Sci Rep 5, 16812 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16812
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Further reading

Illuminationinduced nonequilibrium charge states in selfassembled quantum dots
Physical Review B (2018)

Ultralow charge and spin noise in selfassembled quantum dots
Journal of Crystal Growth (2017)

Broadband terahertz dispersion control in hybrid waveguides
Optics Express (2016)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.