Selective interlayer ferromagnetic coupling between the Cu spins in YBa2Cu3O7−x grown on top of La0.7Ca0.3MnO3

Abstract

Studies to date on ferromagnet/d-wave superconductor heterostructures focus mainly on the effects at or near the interfaces while the response of bulk properties to heterostructuring is overlooked. Here we use resonant soft x-ray scattering spectroscopy to reveal a novel c-axis ferromagnetic coupling between the in-plane Cu spins in YBa2Cu3O7−x (YBCO) superconductor when it is grown on top of ferromagnetic La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 (LCMO) manganite layer. This coupling, present in both normal and superconducting states of YBCO, is sensitive to the interfacial termination such that it is only observed in bilayers with MnO2 but not with La0.7Ca0.3O interfacial termination. Such contrasting behaviors, we propose, are due to distinct energetic of CuO chain and CuO2 plane at the La0.7Ca0.3O and MnO2 terminated interfaces respectively, therefore influencing the transfer of spin-polarized electrons from manganite to cuprate differently. Our findings suggest that the superconducting/ferromagnetic bilayers with proper interfacial engineering can be good candidates for searching the theorized Fulde-Ferrel-Larkin-Ovchinnikov (FFLO) state in cuprates and studying the competing quantum orders in highly correlated electron systems.

Introduction

Ferromagnetism and d-wave superconductivity are often viewed as antagonistic orders as the spin exchange field from ferromagnetism can introduce energy difference between electrons in the spin-singlet Cooper pair. Although the Cooper pair can also be formed with electrons from Zeeman splitted Fermi surfaces, an approach that gives finite center of mass momentum to the Cooper pair and leads to a spatially modulated superconducting order parameter, such state (Fulde-Ferrel-Larkin-Ovchinnikov, or FFLO, state1,2,3) remains to be identified in the high temperature superconducting cuprates. The coexistence of ferromagnetism and superconductivity has been reported in some uranium-based superconductors4,5, but these superconductors have p-wave pairing symmetry and will not be the right candidates for studying the competitive interactions between ferromagnetism and d-wave superconductivity.

With advanced thin-film growth technology6,7,8,9,10, heterostructures made out of superconducting cuprates and ferromagnetic manganites can serve as an ideal platform for such studies. Measurements on YBa2Cu3O7−x/La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 (YBCO/LCMO) heterostructures have revealed an induced ferromagnetic Cu spin moment in the interfacial CuO2 plane that couples antiferromagnetically to the underlying Mn spin moment6. Interesting phenomena such as ferromagnetism/superconductivity proximity11,12 and inverse proximity effect13, transfer of spin-polarized electrons from manganite to cuprate14 and the electronic orbital reconstruction at the interface7 were also observed and proposed to account for the suppression of both ferromagnetism and d-wave superconductivity upon forming such heterostructures (Fig. 1(a)). However, studies to date on these heterostructures focus mainly on the effects at or near the interfaces while the response of bulk properties to heterostructuring is overlooked. Here we use bulk-sensitive resonant soft x-ray scattering spectroscopy (RSXS) and first principles calculations to show that beyond the interface, a novel ferromagnetic order can be established within the YBCO layer possibly even in the superconducting state. This c-axis ferromagnetic coupling between the in-plane Cu spins is subtle and can be effectively controlled by the interfacial termination.

Figure 1
figure1

(a) Schematics illustrating various effects at the interface of a heterostructure. (b) Crystal structure near the interface of YBCO/LCMO bilayers with MnO2 (left panel) and La0.7Ca0.3O (right panel) interfacial terminations. The arrows indicate the orientation and magnitude (not in proportion) of Mn and induced Cu spin moments. (c) Synchrotron reflectivity measurement on the MnO2 terminated bilayer at 80 K and 1240 eV. The YBCO (001) Bragg peak is indicated by the arrow. Inset shows the q-scans at 80 K (blue) and 300 K (red) from the MnO2 terminated bilayer at 925.25 eV. The photodiode intensity was normalized by the incident photon flux only and no background subtraction was applied. The markers are data points and lines are Lorentzian fitting results.

Results

X-ray reflectivity of the bilayer

Due to very small mismatch between the in-plane lattice constants of YBCO and LCMO, epitaxial growth of YBCO/LCMO bilayers with atomically smooth interfaces can be achieved. As illustrated in Fig. 1(b), the crystallinity requires that CuO2 plane and CuO chain to be at the cuprate/manganite interface in MnO2 (left panel) and La0.7Ca0.3O (right panel) terminated bilayers, respectively. After growth, the film quality was checked separately with synchrotron reflectivity and the result from MnO2 terminated bilayer at 80 K is shown in Fig. 1(c). The measurement photon energy was 1240 eV, far away from Mn and Cu resonances. Clear intensity oscillations known as Kiessig fringes from the constructive and destructive interferences between the reflected x-rays off different interfaces confirm the high film quality. By fitting these Kiessig fringes, the thickness of each layer is determined to be 15 nm (YBCO) and 7.5 nm (LCMO), in agreement with the growth conditions (see section V in Supplementary Information).

One immediately notices that the intensity of YBCO (001) structural Bragg peak, marked by the arrow in the figure, is only slightly stronger than the Kiessig fringes at this photon energy. This peak is even weaker than the (002) Bragg peak measured at larger 2θ angle. The weak (001) Bragg peak is due to the unique YBCO form factor such that the scattered x-rays from charges in two CuO2 planes and one CuO chain in the unit cell interfere destructively and is the key to allow us to identify the even weaker magnetic contribution.

Comparison of XAS spectra and RSXS resonance profiles

The electronic structure of YBCO is changed when it is grown on top of the LCMO layer. These changes can even be seen at 300 K where the LCMO layer remains paramagnetic. Thin solid lines in Fig. 2 represent the Cu L-edge x-ray absorption (XAS) spectra from a pure YBCO film (green, top panel) and the bilayers with MnO2 (red, middle panel) and La0.7Ca0.3O (blue, bottom panel) interfacial terminations recorded in the total electron yield mode. Although the main peak at 925.75 eV, ascribed to in-plane Cu2+ with a single hole15, is very similar between these samples, the shoulder near 927.5 eV and the high energy feature around 928.75 eV exhibit small differences. The shoulder structure, relevant to the ligand holes in CuO2 planes (, see inset in Fig. 2), is suppressed in both bilayers. The suppression is consistent with their lower superconducting transition temperatures from effectively lower hole doping levels16. In addition, the high energy feature from Cu+ shows an enhancement, implying a noticeable charge-transfer effect taking place in CuO chains.

Figure 2
figure2

Thin and thick solid lines are the x-ray absorption spectra (XAS) and the resonance profiles of YBCO (001) Bragg peak at 300 K from the pure YBCO film (green, top panel), MnO2 (red, middle panel) and La0.7Ca0.3O terminated (blue, bottom panel) bilayers. Inset shows the Cu L3 edge XAS of the pure YBCO film with ticks denoting the three states of Cu.

Even though these changes in XAS spectra upon heterostructuring are subtle, they can be clearly seen in the resonance profiles. In RSXS spectroscopy, the resonance profile of an electronic order is sensitive to the electronic states that coherently scatter the x-rays into the specific ordering wave vector (see Methods and the schematic of experimental setup in Fig. 3(e))17,18. depends on the form factor of scattering channel(s) of ith atom , which can be charge, spin and orbital degrees of freedom and the spatial arrangement of these scatterers in the following way: . Here is the position vector of ith atom, E is the excitation photon energy and the summation is carried out over the superlattice. depends on the incident and scattered photon polarizations and is the sum of real and imaginary parts that are related to each other through Kramers-Kronig relations. Because of such dependence, RSXS resonance profile often exhibits a higher degree of sensitivity to changes in local electronic structure than XAS. In the current study, we choose YBCO (001) Bragg peak ( in (HKL) unit) since the ferromagnetic coupling between magnetic unit cells along c-axis would have the same wave vector as the charge unit cell.

Figure 3
figure3

Red markers (left axis) and blue lines (right axis) represent the normalized (001) Bragg peak intensity and magnetization for (a) the pure YBCO film, (b) MnO2 and (c) La0.7Ca0.3O terminated bilayers. The intensity of (001) Bragg peak is normalized to 1.0 at 300 K. The superconducting transition, STO structural phase transition and Curie temperatures are marked by green, black and open arrows respectively. (d) Resistivity of the bilayers with MnO2 (red) and La0.7Ca0.3O (blue) interfacial terminations. (e) Schematic illustration of experimental geometry with ϕ angle at 0°. (f) Azimuthal angle ϕ dependence of the normalized (001) peak intensity (red markers) overlaid with a sinusoidal functional form (blue line, see text). The data were taken at 80 K.

The resonance profiles of these samples are shown as thick solid lines in Fig. 2. For bilayers, irrespective to which interfacial termination, the resonance profiles are very different from that of the pure YBCO film. Their resonance profiles show two prominent peaks instead of one at both Cu L3 and L2 edges (features labelled A and B at L3 edge). This double-peak structure is intrinsic and is neither caused by the self-absorption effect in the fluorescence yield measurements, nor by the presence of two types of Cu2+ in CuO2 planes. Further discussions can be found in section III in Supplementary Information. Comparison to the maximum in XAS spectra shows that feature A is shifted towards lower photon energy by ~0.5 eV. Since XAS and RSXS spectra in Fig. 2 were recorded simultaneously, this energy shift is not an experimental artifact. In fact, similar energy shift has been reported in some transition metal oxides that exhibit electronic ordering phenomena and in the case of cuprates, it was previously attributed to the subtle spatial variation in the local energetic of Cu 3d and O 2p states19,20,21. The detailed calculation of resonance profiles remains an actively developing field and will not be discussed in this paper. For example, one may attempt to first use the x-ray magnetic reflectivity (XRMR) to fit the Kiessig fringes to obtain the complex index of refraction , which contains the information of charge and magnetic density profile over the thickness of layers and then use the optical theorem to link δ(E) and β(E) to f′(E) and f″(E) respectively22. However, this approach in only valid in the forward scattering geometry where Kiessig fringes are the dominant features in the spectra. In addition, XRMR cannot reveal the local spin moment. For rigorous treatment of resonant x-ray scattering using the Kramers-Heisenberg formalism, see refs 23,24. Here we set the measurement photon energy at 925.25 eV to focus on feature A to study the magnetic interactions in CuO2 planes. At this photon energy, the 2θ angle is around 70°. Inset in Fig. 1(c) shows the exemplary q-scans at 80 K (blue) and 300 K (red) from MnO2 terminated bilayer at this photon energy. As one can see, the Kiessig fringes that overwhelm the (001) Bragg peak in Fig. 1(c) become negligible. The correlation length, determined from the inverse of half-width-half-maximum of the peak, is >12 nm and is in agreement with the YBCO layer thickness. This again confirms the bulk nature of recorded RSXS signal.

Additional magnetic component in the YBCO (001) Bragg peak

Figure 3 shows the main experimental findings of this paper: the temperature dependence of normalized YBCO (001) Bragg peak intensity (red markers, left axis; the intensity is normalized to 1.0 at 300 K) overlaid with the magnetization curves (blue lines, right axis) from these samples. The data points shown here are from the Lorentzian fitting of q-scan spectra (see Methods). For pure YBCO film, the temperature-independent Bragg peak intensity implies that the changes in Cu charge scattering form factor, as well as their spatial arrangement, are negligible between ~80 K and 300 K as expected (Fig. 3(a)). On the other hand, the Bragg peak intensity from MnO2 terminated bilayer shows intriguing temperature dependence where two step-like increases can be correlated with characteristic temperatures in the magnetization curve: the ~190 K is the Curie temperature of LCMO layer and the ~105 K is related to the structural phase transition of STO substrate (Fig. 3(b))25. Since we do not expect to see changes in Cu charge scattering as temperature is lowered, the increases can be attributed to an additional order induced by the ferromagnetism in LCMO layer.

The nature of this additional order can be further investigated by looking at the Bragg peak intensity as a function of sample orientation relative to the photon polarization (see Fig. 3(e) for experimental geometry and the Methods). Under the resonance condition, the scattering intensity can come from following terms that involve (unit vector) , and spin moment , and 17,18. These three terms contribute to the monopole charge scattering, circular and linear dichroism respectively. Since the incident photon energy is tuned close to Cu2+ L3 absorption edge, we only consider the dipole (E1) transition. Following the treatment by Hill & McMorrow17, the scattering tensor can be expressed with components that depend on the incident and scattered photon polarizations (here, for example, σi and πo refer to incident σ and scattered π polarization respectively):

F(0)(E), F(1)(E) and F(2)(E) are defined in ref. 17. zi are the spin moments projected along three Cartesian axes and θ is the grazing incidence angle (~35° in the current study).

Usually, the F(i)(E) terms do not mix with each other except that the 0th harmonic component of F(2)(E) can mix with F(0)(E). But for ferromagnetic coupling where the magnetic unit cell coincides with the charge unit cell, the Kronecker δ conserving the wave vectors in each term becomes 1 and these three terms need to be considered all together as shown above. In calculating the scattering intensity by taking the square of this matrix in equation (1), the cross terms will enhance the weak magnetic signal. Keeping the leading terms, the scattering intensity will vary with sample azimuthal angle (ϕ) as following: . The parameters b and c depend on the spin projection angle α and are proportional to and (see Section IV in Supplementary Information).

In Fig. 3(f), the (001) Bragg peak intensity at 80 K shows the strong ϕ dependence, which can be fitted with the aforementioned functional form (blue curve in Fig. 3(f)). One should note that such ϕ dependence cannot come from Cu2+ charge scattering or the spin component normal to the CuO2 plane because these two contributions do not depend on ϕ. On the other hand, it can come from Cu2+ spin component in the CuO2 plane. This finding implies the magnetic origin for the additional order seen in the YBCO (001) Bragg peak. The (001) wave vector further tells us that it is caused by the inter-unit-cell (c-axis) ferromagnetic coupling between the in-plane Cu spins. With the π-scattering geometry, the maxima around 0° and 180° allow us to determine that the projected in-plane component is along the Cu-O bond direction (Fig. 3(e) shows the geometry at ϕ = 0°). This spin alignment is 45° away from the easy axis of Mott antiferromagnetism, which is along the Cu-Cu or (110) direction, but follows the easy axis of ferromagnetism in the LCMO layer and is likely the outcome of strong couplings between manganite and cuprate6,26,27.

Although the induced ferromagnetic spin moments in the interfacial CuO2 plane below the Curie temperature of LCMO layer have been previously reported6,28,29,30, our RSXS data suggests that they may have coupled ferromagnetically along c-axis throughout the YBCO layer as the diffraction peak width is limited by the layer thickness. This c-axis ferromagnetic spin coupling is established at 80 K, just above the ~70 K superconducting transition temperature of YBCO under study. But the continued increase in RSXS intensity in Fig. 3(b) points to the scenario that this coupling can persist down to 30 K for its absence would put the normalized intensity value back to ~1.0. But this coupling is subtle and can be greatly influenced by the interfacial termination. We have performed the same RSXS measurements on La0.7Ca0.3O terminated bilayer and the results are shown in Fig. 3(c). Despite showing very similar characteristic temperatures in the magnetization curve as those in the MnO2 terminated bilayer, the (001) Bragg peak intensity remains nearly temperature independent within our measurement resolution.

DFT calculations

To investigate these contrasting behaviors, we have carried out the DFT calculations (for details, see Methods). The schematic in Fig. 4 shows the stacking order of CuO chains (black filled circles with vertical bars) and CuO2 planes (red open circles with horizontal bars) along c-axis in the calculations. The labeling of Cu sites is guide for readers to associate the calculated spin moments with their spatial arrangement. The positive and negative moments refer to the Cu spins that are parallel and antiparallel to the Mn spins, respectively. The DFT calculations show that the magnitude of Cu spin moment in the MnO2 terminated bilayer (Fig. 4(a)) is on the order of ~0.02 μB/Cu in CuO2 planes (red open circles), consistent with the XMCD measurements. However, the moment in CuO chains is negligible (black filled circles). The antiferromagnetic coupling between Mn and Cu spin moments near the interface is correctly reproduced in our DFT calculations (Cu site #1 in Fig. 4(a)). This coupling remains antiferromagnetic between the first two CuO2 planes, a phenomenon that was previously predicted by the model calculations and was attributed to an anomalous screening effect31. Besides the first unit cell, our DFT calculations predict the ferromagnetically coupled spin moments through out the rest of YBCO layer. In contrast, for La0.7Ca0.3O terminated bilayer, only the chain Cu right next to the interface exhibits a finite spin moment that couples ferromagnetically to the Mn spin moment (Fig. 4(b)). In that regard, the La0.7Ca0.3O terminated bilayer is not expected to have ferromagnetic order inside the YBCO layer. Our DFT calculations have given the results that are in agreement with the RSXS data in Fig. 3(b,c).

Figure 4
figure4

The calculated spin moment on the Cu sites in the CuO chains (black filled circles) and CuO2 planes (red open circles) for (a) MnO2 and (b) La0.7Ca0.3O terminated bilayers. The positive (negative) spin moment is defined as the Cu spin parallel (antiparallel) to the Mn spin. The schematic next to these two figures shows the tacking order of the CuO chains (black filled circles with vertical bars) and CuO2 planes (red open circles with horizontal bars) along the c-axis in the calculations. The labelling of Cu sites is for the readers to associate the calculated spin moments with their spatial arrangement.

Discussion

We have identified a novel inter-unit-cell ferromagnetic coupling between the in-plane Cu spins in YBCO based on the clear ϕ and temperature dependence of YBCO (001) Bragg peak intensity recorded at Cu2+ resonance energy. This ferromagnetic coupling is sensitive to the interfacial termination such that we could not detect its presence in the La0.7Ca0.3O terminated bilayer under the same experimental condition. Observation of this coupling can also be compared with previous model calculations31. Here, we propose that the distinct energetic of CuO2 plane and CuO chain at the manganite/cuprate interface in the MnO2 and La0.7Ca0.3O terminated bilayers respectively is responsible for the contrasting behaviors.

For MnO2 terminated bilayer, we propose that the double-exchange interaction in the itinerant eg bands of YBCO, which is absent in the pristine YBCO and was omitted in the previous model calculations31, emerges due to the induced Cu spin moments and the influence from the ferromagnetism in poorly screened LCMO underlayer11. For La0.7Ca0.3O terminated bilayer, the situation is rather different. Although the chain Cu has higher affinity to attract the spin-polarized electrons from LCMO layer, as evident from its lower superconducting transition temperature, the larger induced moment (~0.04 μB/Cu) and the ferromagnetic coupling to the Mn spin moment, the lower eg electron itineracy in quasi-1D chains plus the strong electron affinity can localize the transferred electrons to the interface and weaken the double-exchange interaction in the remaining YBCO layer (Fig. 4(b)). Furthermore, different occupancy on the respective orbitals of chain and plane Cu can also disrupt the double-exchange mediated ferromagnetic coupling.

Since previous XMCD measurements adopted specific geometries to suppress the ferromagnetic signal from the bulk layers so as to enhance the contrast from the interface region, these XMCD results are not able to substantiate or dispute our findings6,28,29,32. Therefore, observing this c-axis ferromagnetic coupling calls for further investigation on the MnO2 terminated bilayers using XMCD with geometries that emphasize the sensitivity to bulk ferromagnetic signal from YBCO layer. In addition, our DFT calculations suggest that the induced Cu spin moment can couple ferromagnetically to the Mn spin moment in the La0.7Ca0.3O terminated bilayer. Thus performing the XMCD measurements on this type of bilayer can serve as an independent check to the theories. Our results also highlight the fact that the bulk properties of constituting layers will respond to heterostructuring, an aspect that is largely overlooked and it has recently been shown that interesting phenomena can be manifested beyond the interfaces by applying the perturbations in the heterostructures33.

In conjunction with previous XMCD measurements6,28,29,32, our results suggest that the induced ferromagnetic Cu spin moments in CuO2 planes may couple ferromagnetically along the c-axis, forming the bulk ferromagnetism in YBCO. This ferromagnetism can even exist in the superconducting state. It is known that the correlated transition metal oxides can exhibit strong tendency towards electronic phase separation, which leads to other intriguing phenomena like colossal magnetoresistance34, but the possibility of coexistence of ferromagnetism and d-wave superconductivity (ferromagnetic d-wave superconductor) makes this type of bilayer an exciting platform for investigating novel phases associated with high temperature superconductivity. Introducing ferromagnetism to relax the asymptotic confinement that limits the carrier mobility in the underdoped regime not only serves as an alternative to induce the emergent quantum states besides the conventional hole doping approach, but can also reveal a new dimension in cuprate phase diagram. Subjecting d-wave superconductivity to strong exchange field weakens its strength and enhances the competition with other ground states such as charge checkerboard and/or stripes35,36 and examining the extent of such competitions can be facilitated by using the heterostructures. Moreover, realizing the prerequisites for FFLO state implies that cuprate/manganite heterostructures may exhibit other exotic properties like non-centrosymmetric Cooper pairs and stripe-like inhomogeneity37. Exploring their non-trivial interplay with inherent charge inhomogeneity will expand the boundaries of d-wave superconductivity theories. To rule out the ubiquitous phase separation phenomenon38 and unambiguously identify this ferromagnetic d-wave superconductor, spectromicroscopy with sufficient energy and spatial resolutions such as spin-resolved nano-ARPES can be the decisive tool for this task39.

Methods

Materials

YBa2Cu3O7−x/La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 bilayers were fabricated on top of the (100) oriented SrTiO3 (STO) single crystal substrate using pulsed laser deposition (PLD) method. A KrF (λ = 248 nm) excimer laser, with 10 Hz repetition rate and 250 mJ power, was used to evaporate the targets. Before growing the bilayers, the substrate was first treated with HF-NH4F buffer solution to produce a uniform TiO2 termination at the surface. In-situ reflection high energy electron diffraction (RHEED) was used to monitor the layer growth. The LCMO and YBCO layers were deposited at 700 °C and 750 °C and 80 mTorr and 150 mTorr oxygen pressures respectively. After growth, these films were annealed in a 700 Torr oxygen atmosphere at 550 °C for one hour followed by slow cooling down to the room temperature to achieve full oxygenation for the YBCO layer. To produce the MnO2 termination at the manganite/cuprate interface, we started with TiO2 terminated STO substrate and deposited the LCMO layer directly on top of it, then followed by the deposition of YBCO layer. To switch to the La0.7Ca0.3O termination at the interface, a SrRuO3 buffer layer (SRO, 1.5 u.c.) was deposited between the STO and LCMO layer. The schematic crystal structures shown in Fig. 1(b) were confirmed by the high angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HDDAF-STEM) (see Section I in Supplementary Information).

Transport measurements

The resistivity of bilayer samples was measured using the standard four-point method. The superconducting transition temperatures were determined to be ~70 and 55 K for MnO2 and La0.7Ca0.3O terminated bilayers respectively. The magnetization measurements were carried out using the superconducting quantum interference device magnetometer (SQUID, Quantum Design MPMS). 1000 Oe magnetic field was applied perpendicular to the surface of bilayers during the measurements and we only show the zero-field cooling data in the paper. The Curie temperature of LCMO layer is estimated by intersecting the linear extrapolation of high temperature leading edge of dM(T)/dT curve to zero and is ~190 K (see Section II in Supplementary Information).

X-ray spectroscopy

X-ray absorption (XAS) and resonant soft x-ray scattering (RSXS) were performed at Beamline 8.0.1 of Advanced Light Source (ALS) using the RSXS endstation40. During the measurements, the photon energy resolution was better than 0.3 eV at Cu L-edges and the beam spot on sample was around 40 μm (v) by 500 μm (h). In XAS, the spectra shown in Fig. 2 were recorded in the total electron yield mode (photo-current from sample to the ground). The spectra were normalized by the photon flux determined from the photo-current of an upstream Au mesh. The atomic contributions responsible for step-like intensity increases around Cu L3 and L2 edges were further removed.

In RSXS, both incident photon polarization and scattering plane were horizontal (π-scattering geometry). A photodiode with front Al window to block out ambient light (primarily the visible light around the chamber) was used to record the scattered x-rays from the bilayers. This detector, which does not have the selectivity on the polarization or energy of scattered photons, records signal from specular reflection, fluorescence and the YBCO (001) Bragg peak simultaneously. Two types of scan, hv- and q-scans, were used to produce the spectra in Figs 2 and 3 respectively. In the momentum-space scan (q-scan), the sample and detector were placed at the specular geometry such that their angles relative to the incident photon beam followed the θ − 2θ relationship. Since the signals from specular reflection and fluorescence have monotonic angular dependence, they can be separated from the Bragg peak by fitting q-scan spectra with a Lorentzian function on top of a quadratic background. The Kiessig fringes at this photon energy are negligible and do not affect the fitting results. The Bragg peak intensity presented in Fig. 3(a–c,f) is the peak area. The resonance profile (hv-scan) was measured with sample and detector angles following the θ − 2θ relationship and tracking the incident photon energy so that the photon momentum transfer stayed at the (001) Bragg peak wave vector.

In the azimuthal dependence measurements, the x-ray beam was defocused to a size of ~2 mm square to mitigate the sample spatial inhomogeneity issue. The zero of azimuthal angle is defined with the crystallographic a/b axis in the horizontal scattering plane.

DFT calculations

The first principles calculations were performed using the accurate full-potential augmented wave method, as implemented in the VASP package within the GGA + U schemes. The calculations were performed over an 8 × 8 × 1 Monkhorst-Pack k point mesh in the irreducible Brillouin zone. Both bilayers contained 4 u.c. of YBCO and 6 u.c. of LCMO. The structure of bilayer was optimized with the residual atomic forces less than 0.05 eV/Å. U values used for La 4f and Mn 3d orbitals are 5.0 eV and 4.0 eV respectively.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Huang, S. W. et al. Selective interlayer ferromagnetic coupling between the Cu spins in YBa2Cu3O7–x grown on top of La0.7Ca0.3MnO3. Sci. Rep. 5, 16690; doi: 10.1038/srep16690 (2015).

References

  1. Bianchi, A., Movshovich, R., Capan, C., Pagliuso, P. G. & Sarrao, J. L. Possible Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov superconducting state in CeCoIn5, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 187004 (2003).

  2. Fulde, P. & Ferrell, R. A. Superconductivity in a strong spin-exchange field, Phys. Rev. 135, A550 (1964).

  3. Larkin, A. I. & Ovchinnikov, Y. N. Inhomogeneous state of superconductors, Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 762 (1965).

  4. Saxena, S. S. et al. Superconductivity on the border of itinerant-electron ferromagnetism in Uge2, Nature 406, 587–592 (2000).

  5. Aoki, D. et al. Coexistence of superconductivity and ferromagnetism in URhGe, Nature 413, 613–616 (2001).

  6. Chakhalian, J. et al. Magnetism at the interface between ferromagnetic and superconducting oxides, Nature Phys. 2, 244–248 (2006).

  7. Chakhalian, J. et al. Orbital reconstruction and covalent bonding at an oxide interface, Science 318, 1114–1117 (2007).

  8. Hwang, H. Y. et al. Emergent phenomena at oxide interface, Nature Mater. 11, 103–113 (2012).

  9. Ohtomo, A. & Hwang, H. Y. A high-mobility electron gas at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 heterointerface, Nature 427, 423–426 (2004).

  10. Tra, Vu-Thanh et al. Termination control of charge transfer in YBa2Cu3O7−x/La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 heterostructures, Submitted to Adv. Mater.

  11. Salafranca, Juan et al. Competition between covalent bonding and charge transfer at complex-oxide interfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 196802 (2014).

  12. Soltan, S., Albrecht, J. & Habermeier, H.-U. Ferromagnetic/superconducting bilayer structure: A model system for spin diffusion length estimation, Phys. Rev. B 70, 144517 (2004).

  13. Buzdin, A. I. Proximity effects in superconductor-ferromagnet heterostructures, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 935–976 (2005).

  14. Peña, V. et al. Coupling of superconductors through a half-metallic ferromagnet: Evidence for a long-range proximity effect, Phys. Rev. B 69, 224502 (2004).

  15. van Veenendaal, M. A. & Sawatzky, G. A. Intersite interactions in Cu L-edge XPS, XAS and XES of doped and undoped Cu compounds, Phys. Rev B 49, 3473–3482 (1994).

  16. Tallon, J. L., Bernhard, C., Shaked, H., Hitterman, R. L. & Jorgensen, J. D. Generic superconducting phase behavior in high-Tc cuprates: Tc variation with hole concentration in YBa2Cu3 O7, Phys. Rev. B 51, 12911–12914 (1995).

  17. Hill, J. & McMorrow, D. F. X-ray resonant exchange scattering: polarization dependence and correlation functions, Acta Cryst. A 52, 236–244 (1996).

  18. Lovesey, S. W. & Collins, S. P. X-ray scattering and absorption by magnetic materials, Oxford series on synchrotron radiation, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1996.

  19. Zhou, S. Y. et al. Ferromagnetic Enhancement of CE-Type Spin Ordering in (Pr,Ca)MnO3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 186404 (2011).

  20. Abbamonte, P. et al. Spatially modulated Mottness in La2−xBaxCuO4, Nature Phys. 1, 155–158 (2005).

  21. Achkar, A. J. et al. Resonant x-ray scattering measurements of a spatial modulation of Cu 3d and O 2p energies in stripe-ordered cuprate superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 017001 (2013).

  22. Brück, S. et al. The temperature-dependent magnetization profile across an epitaxial bilayer of ferromagnetic La2/3Ca1/3MnO3 and superconducting YBa2Cu3 O7−δ, New J. Phys. 13, 033023 (2011).

  23. Ament, L. J. P., van Veenendaal, M. A., Devereaux, T. P., Hill, J. P. & van den Brink, J. Resonant inelastic x-ray scattering studies of elementary excitations, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 705 (2011).

  24. Fink, J., Schierle, E., Weschke, E. & Geck, J. Resonant elastic soft x-ray scattering, Rep. Prog. Phys. 76, 056502 (2013).

  25. Loetzsch, R. et al. The cubic to tetragonal phase transition in SrTiO3 single crystals near its surface under internal and external strains, Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 071901 (2010).

  26. Shamoto, S., Sato, M., Tranquada, J. M., Sternlieb, B. J. & Shirane, G. Perovskite oxide superlattices: Neutron scattering study of antiferromagnetism in YBa2Cu3 O6.15, Phys. Rev. B. 48, 13817–13825 (1993).

  27. Krüger, E. Theoretical investigation of the magnetic structure in YBa2Cu3 O6, Phys. Rev. B. 75, 024408 (2007).

  28. Giblin, S. R. et al. Measurement of magnetic exchange in ferromagnetic-superconductor La2/3Ca1/3MnO3/YBa2Cu3O7 bilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 137005 (2012).

  29. Werner, R. et al. YBa2Cu3O7/La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 bilayers: Interface coupling and electric transport properties, Phys. Rev. B 82, 224509 (2010).

  30. Freeland, J. W., Chakhalian, J., Habermeier, H.-U., Cristiani, G. & Keimer, B. On magnetic interlayer coupling and proximity effect in a La0.67Ca0.33MnO3 (10 nm)/YBa2Cu3O7 (10 nm) superlattice, Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 242502 (2007).

  31. Salafranca, J. & Okamoto, S. Unconventional proximity effect and inverse spin switch behavior in a model manganite-cuprate-manganite trilayer system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 256804 (2010).

  32. Satapathy, D. K. et al. Magnetic proximity effect in YBa2Ca3O7/La2/3Ca1/3MnO3 and YBa2Ca3O7/LaMnO3+δ superlattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 197201 (2012).

  33. De Luca, G. M. et al. Ubiquitous long-range antiferromagnetic coupling across the interface between superconducting and ferromagnetic oxides, Nature Communications 5 5626 (2014).

  34. Dagotto, E., Hotta, T. & Moreo, A. Colossal magnetoresistant materials: the key role of phase separation, Physics Reports 344, 1 (2001).

  35. Ghiringhelli, G. et al. Long-range incommensurate charge fluctuation in (Y,Nd)Ba2Cu3 O6+x, Science 337, 821–825 (2012).

  36. Chang, J. et al. Direct observation of competition between superconductivity and charge density wave order in YBa2Cu3 O6.67, Nature Phys. 8, 871–876 (2012).

  37. Liu, S. L. & Zhou, T. Phase transition in the Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov states for the d-wave superconductor in the two-dimensional orthorhombic lattice, J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 25, 913–921 (2012).

  38. Bert, Julie A. et al. Direct imaging of the coexistence of ferromagnetism and superconductivity at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interfaces, Nature Phys. 7, 767–771 (2011).

  39. Bostwick, A., Rotenberg, E., Avila, J. & Asensio, M. C., Zooming in on electronic structure: nanoARPES at SOLEIL and ALS, Synchrotron Radiation News 25, issue 5, 19 (2012).

  40. Doering, D. et al. Development of a compact fast CCD camera and resonant soft x-ray scattering endstation for time-resolved pump-probe experiments, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 073303 (2011).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Advanced Light Source is supported by the Director, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. S.W.H. would like to thank Ruimin Qiao and Wanli Yang for supporting the beamline operation. This work was also supported by MOST of Taiwan, R.O.C. under Grants 103-2112-M-009-007-MY3 and the MOE ATU program.

Author information

S.W.H. and J.-Y.L. conceived the idea. V.T.T., J.M.L., J.M.C., Y.H.C. and J.-Y.L. provided bilayer samples and transport, magnetization characterization. S.W.H., M.C.L., Y.-D.C. and J.-Y.L. carried out the experiments. H.T.J. performed the DFT calculations. S.W.H. and S.R. performed fitting to the x-ray reflectivity measurements. S.W.H., L.A.W., Y.H.C., R.W.S., Y.-D.C. and J.-Y.L. interpreted the data. S.W.H., Y.-D.C. and J.-Y.L. wrote up the manuscript.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, S., Wray, L., Jeng, H. et al. Selective interlayer ferromagnetic coupling between the Cu spins in YBa2Cu3O7−x grown on top of La0.7Ca0.3MnO3. Sci Rep 5, 16690 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16690

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.