There is a growing need for low-cost, flexible and rugged energy storage devices compatible with emerging flexible energy conversion devices and structural energy and power1,2,3,4. Recent work has demonstrated electrode materials with both mechanical robustness and electrochemical functionality, including carbon nanotube Buckypaper5,6,7,8, reduced graphene oxide paper9,10,11, graphite on super-aligned CNTs12, TiO2 on activated carbon fabric12 and vanadium pentoxide (V2O5) wires13. Of these, V2O5 is particularly promising because it offers higher specific energy and because it has the ability to form paper-like electrodes very similar to Bucky paper. Unfortunately, the application of V2O5 in practical batteries has been hindered by a low Li+-diffusion coefficient (10−12 –10−13 cm2/s)14, low electronic conductivity (10−2 –10−3 S/cm)14 and volumetric changes15 during cycling.

Past approaches sought to address the electrochemical limitations of V2O5 by incorporation of conductive polymers, but little has been achieved by way of mechanical enhancement. Conjugated polymers can improve the electronic conductivity of V2O5 electrodes16,17 and ethylene oxide-containing polymers have demonstrated improved ionic conductivity18. Besides the materials themselves, the manner in which the blend is prepared can have a huge impact on electrode structure and mechanical properties. Large-scale phase separation between different components can result in poor mechanical properties, so intimate mixing and good interfacial adhesion is important.

To demonstrate a viable route to mechanically robust V2O5 electrodes, we propose the implementation of block copolymers, in which two polymers are covalently attached to each other preventing mascroscopic phase separation19. There exist only a handful of studies that incorporate block copolymers into hybrid electrodes, highlighting that the largest challenge for these hybrid electrodes is to balance the benefits of the added conductivity from the polymer without diluting the active material. For instance, the Balsara group reported the use of poly(3-hexylthiophene)-block-poly(ethyleneoxide) P3HT-b-PEO block copolymer as a conductive binder for a LiFePO4 cathode20,21. LiFePO4 performed at near-theoretical capacity, but a block copolymer loading of 50 wt% was required; mechanical properties were not reported. The Mayes group reported the synthesis of V2O5 aerogel within a block copolymer matrix18. This resulted in significantly improved mechanical properties, but the V2O5 content was only 34 wt%, resulting in a very low capacity. In both of these approaches, the loading of the active material was prohibitively low.

Here, our approach centers on a V2O5 hybrid electrode, in which we balance a high active material content with the benefits afforded by the P3HT-b-PEO block copolymer. The electrodes are prepared in a straightforward and scalable water-based process and the addition of just 5 wt % block copolymer produces electrodes with excellent mechanical flexibility. We present the electrochemical and mechanical properties of the hybrid electrodes as a function of composition, for which a trade-off between polymer content and electromechanical properties is revealed. Specifically, we demonstrate that small amounts of a (P3HT-b-PEO) block copolymer can bring about significant improvements in mechanical flexibility, toughness and lithium ion diffusion. The enhanced mechanical properties are attributed to the self-assembled layering of V2O5 with P3HT-b-PEO micellar aggregates. A proof-of-concept flexible half-cell is also shown. These results confirm that these ion- and electron-conducting block copolymers are excellent binders, bringing about not only conductivity but also mechanical flexibility.

Results and Discussion

Our approach to flexible hybrid battery electrodes was to combine P3HT-b-PEO block copolymer with V2O5. The block copolymer contains electron- and ion-conducting P3HT and PEO blocks, respectively, whereas V2O5 has a high capacity for lithium ions. The challenge is to combine the two materials in such a manner so as to leverage the conductivity and flexibility of the polymer without compromising the electroactivity of the V2O5. Thus processing and blending were key considerations.

P3HT-b-PEO was synthesized using a modified approach based upon our prior publication22. Briefly, reactive, end-functionalized P3HT and PEO macroreagents were synthesized separately and coupled through a copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne click coupling reaction (see Scheme S1). The P3HT macroreagent was prepared through an externally-initiated polymerization reaction, which provided a higher degree of end-group functionality compared with conventional methods23. The catalyst contained a tosylate functionality, which was then converted to an azide in a single post-polymerization reaction step. The PEO-alkyne macroreagent was prepared through Steglich esterification of commercially available monomethoxy-poly(ethylene oxide) and hexynoic acid. The P3HT prepared for this study had a Mn of 13.3 kDa, as measured by NMR end-group analysis and multi-angle laser light scattering. The PEO block had a Mn of 7.1 kDa. The polydispersity of the final block copolymer was 1.24, as measured by gel-permeation chromatography (GPC). Full details on our synthetic procedure including 1H NMR characterization data and GPC data are provided in the Supporting Information, Figure S1.

We next desired to combine P3HT-b-PEO and V2O5 so as to obtain an intimately mixed, flexible and electroactive electrode. Inspired by earlier approaches16,18,24,25,26,27, we first attempted in situ synthesis of V2O5 in the block copolymer as well as direct mixing of the two components in various solvents or as dry powders. However, none of these approaches yielded electrodes with appreciable electrochemical activity. This result might be explained by considering prior reports on polyaniline/V2O5 hybrid electrodes, where it was observed that polyaniline reduced V5+ to V4+ and the overall electrochemical activity was reduced17. In comparison, it is possible that similar interactions between P3HT and V2O5 might have led to the observed negligible electrochemical activity.

An alternative water-based approach met with much greater success. First, P3HT-b-PEO and lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) were dispersed in water using sonication. The molar ratio of Li+ to ethylene oxide repeat units was kept at 0.08528, which has been reported to be an optimal ratio for lithium-ion conduction29. Although P3HT-b-PEO is insoluble in water, after 1 h sonication, a uniform dispersion was formed (Fig. 1a). The block copolymer dispersion was stable for up to a week, after which large aggregates precipitated. The dispersion itself was purple in color and transparent. Other groups have used mixed solvents or dialysis to disperse P3HT-b-PEO block copolymers in water30,31,32, but our approach centers upon only sonication. From heareafter, hybrid electrodes containing x wt% polymer are called “Px”.

Figure 1
figure 1

(a) P3HT-b-PEO dispersions at low concentration (0.05 mg/ml, left) and high concentration (1 mg/ml, right) with LiTFSI (the molar ratio of Li+ to PEO repeat units was 0.085) in water, (b) transmission electron micrograph of a drop-cast P3HT-b-PEO micellar aggregate. (c) Schematic of P3HT-b-PEO/V2O5/LiTFSI cathode preparation (drawn by H.A.). (d) Digital images of a V2O5/LiTFSI cathode (V2O5) (24 μm thick) and P5 (36 μm thick) in flexure. Movies are also provided in the Supporting Information. (e) Cross-sectional SEM images of V2O5, P5 and P10 cathodes after failure during dynamic mechanical analysis. Micellar aggregates (black dots) were arranged between V2O5 layers in hybrid electrodes.

We propose that a micellization and aggregation process, in which hydrophilic PEO forms a corona around hydrophobic P3HT, is responsible for the dispersion’s stability. In support of this, TEM images of the drop-cast dispersion revealed a micellar aggregate diameter of ~320 nm, Fig. 1b. The dark core (~200 nm diameter) is likely the hydrophobic P3HT block and the lighter shell (~60 nm in thickness) is likely the hydrophilic PEO block. The exact structure of the micellar aggregate remains a topic of future study. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) of the dispersion yielded an average aggregate diameter 250 nm (Figure S2), consistent with TEM results.

Having successfully made the P3HT-b-PEO dispersion, it was next mixed with aqueous V2O5 xerogel and sonicated, Fig. 1c. The mixture was then drop-cast, air-dried and annealed at 90 °C. We prepared cathodes with total polymer content ranging from 1–50 wt % to assess the effect of block copolymer content on mechanical and electrochemical properties. Whereas neat V2O5 cathodes were brittle and failed under modest flexure, all hybrid cathodes were found to be flexible, (Fig. 1d, S3, Movies S1–S3). Cross-sectional SEM images reveal the fractured edges of neat V2O5, P5 and P10 cathodes. Well-packed V2O5 layers were visible throughout, Fig. 1e. The dark regions observed for P5 and P10 hybrid electrodes are likely micellar aggregates sandwiched between layers or locations at which aggregates had been pulled out during the fracturing process. SEM of the surface reveals a rough but uniform morphology, indicating that there is no large-scale phase separation (Figure S4). AFM images of the V2O5 and P5 cathode surfaces showed some evidence of micellar aggregates on the P5 electrode’s surface, Figure S5.

The microstructure of the P3HT-b-PEO/LiTFSI/V2O5 cathodes was analyzed using grazing-incidence wide-angle X-ray scattering (GIWAXS). Films for GIWAXS analysis were prepared by drop-casting onto glass slides followed by air-drying and vacuum annealing at 70 °C, similar to the procedure used for cathode preparation. As shown in Figure S6, P3HT-b-PEO/LiTFSI/V2O5 films exhibited wide-angle scattering peaks at q = 0.38 Å−1 and 0.64 Å−1, corresponding to primary scattering peaks for regioregular P3HT33 and V2O5·nH2O xerogels5, respectively. The most intense peak at 0.64 Å−1 corresponds to quasi-ordered V2O5·nH2O34. An additional peak at 1.70 Å−1 was also apparent from linecut analysis along the qz direction, corresponding to the (003) plane of V2O5·nH2O5. Peaks at 0.38, 0.8 and 1.2 Å−1 correspond to regioregular P3HT crystallization in the edge-on orientation. An in-plane peak at qy = 1.66 Å−1 was evident by linecut analysis and corresponds to face-to-face π-π stacking of P3HT chains.

These measurements reveal crystallization of P3HT and V2O5·nH2O in the composite cathodes. Scattering peaks match those for pure P3HT and V2O5·nH2O, suggesting phase segregation and crystallization of each component within discrete domains. Additionally, crystallites for P3HT and V2O5·nH2O are oriented in the out-of-plane direction, as commonly observed for thermally annealed thin films33. Differential scaning calorimetry revealed only a P3HT crystallization peak (Figure S7), which suggests phase segregation and crystallization of P3HT blocks but not of PEO, consistent with the GIWAXS. This indicates that PEO crystallization was restricted since polymer chains were intercalated into V2O5 layers.

We next sought to quantify the mechanical properties using tensile testing and collapsing radius experiments. Figure 2a shows stress-strain curves for V2O5, P5 and P10 electrodes in triplicate and Table 1 summarizes the average and standard deviation values of tensile strength, ultimate strain, Young’s modulus and toughness (see also Table S1). Both V2O5 and hybrid electrodes exhibited tensile behavior very similar to that of graphene oxide paper, in which three regimes (straightening, elastic and plastic) successively occur during elongation. P10 exhibited the highest ultimate strain and toughness, whereas the Young’s modulus decreased and the tensile strength remained unchanged. It is noteworthy that only 10 wt% polymer (P10) is required to obtain a 320% increase in toughness and a 250% increase in ultimate strain relative to polymer-free V2O5; this enhancement in mechanical properties does not come at the cost of tensile strength, but does cause a decrease in Young’s modulus. SEM images suggest that the enhanced ultimate strain and toughness enhancements come from well-dispersed P3HT-b-PEO micelles between V2O5 slabs, improving the flexibility of hybrid electrodes, Fig. 1e.

Table 1 Mechanical properties of hybrid electrodes derived from the stress-strain curves under tensile loadinga and from the collapsing radius testb respectively.
Figure 2
figure 2

(a) Representative tensile profiles of hybrid electrodes in dependence of P3HT-b-PEO content and (b) digital images of collapsing radius test of hybrid electrodes. The collapsing radii of V2O5, P5 and P10 are 1.70, 0.40 and 0.30 mm, respectively. (Thickness of V2O5, P5 and P10: 26.9, 26.0 and 33.3 μm, respectively).

The mechanical properties of the hybrid electrodes are comparable and in some cases higher, than that of graphene oxide paper and carbon nanotube sheets. For example the tensile strength of the P10 electrode was about four times higher than that of single-walled carbon nanotube Buckypaper (6.3 MPa), whereas the Young’s modulus was only slightly higher (3.5 vs. 2.3 GPa, respectively)35. In comparison, P10’s tensile strength and modulus was 66% and 16% that of graphene oxide paper of similar thickness (22–25 μm, average values of 39 MPa and 22 GPa, respectively). Notably, P10’s toughness was within range of that of graphene oxide paper (293 vs. 251 kJ/m3, respectively)10. On the other hand, the ultimate strain of P10 was far greater than that of graphene oxide paper (5.6% vs. 0.31%, respectively)10,36. These results show that the similarities in the mechanical properties between V2O5 hybrid electrodes, Buckypaper and graphene oxide paper, which are largely attributed to the interlocking nature of the nanomaterials, similar to the morphology shown in Fig. 1e. A comparison with poly(vinylidene difluoride) (PVdF, Table 1) binder shows no remarkable improvement relative to P10, which suggests that the unique block copolymer structure is responsible for the enhanced mechanical properties.

Bending experiments were also conducted with hybrid electrodes, Fig. 2b, Table 1 and Table S2. A strip of a hybrid electrode with thickness dfilm was bent so that a simple curve was formed and then compressed between two parallel plates, Figure S8. The radius of curvature Rcol was taken at the first sign of kink formation. The normal strain εx at the surface was calculated by |εx| = 0.5dfilm/Rcol37. The images in Fig. 2b clearly show that the samples sustained a greater collapsing radius as polymer content increased. This enhancement is attributed to the polymer, which acts as a glue, holding the V2O5 sheets together. Here too, PVdF binder showed no remarkable enhancement relative to P10. This result emphasizes that the P3HT-b-PEO polymer and the self-assembled structure is superior to conventional fluoropolymer binders in terms of mechanical performance.

We next turn to the electrochemical properties of hybrid electrodes. Both V2O5 and P3HT are capable of storing energy, but V2O5 is expected to dominate charge storage behavior because P3HT has a near-negligible capacity (less than 10 mAh/g)20,21. We found that for up to 50 wt% P3HT-b-PEO, the electrode showed no signs of dissolution into the electrolyte. However at higher polymer content, the electrolyte turned purple, suggestive of some amount of P3HT-b-PEO dissolution, Figure S9. Therefore, we investigated only hybrid electrodes containing up to 15 wt% polymer. At and above this concentration, the electrochemical performance was very poor, which we attribute to the low V2O5 content. A half-cell was assembled and the hybrid electrode was used as the cathode, lithium foil as the anode and 1 M LiTFSI in propylene carbonate as the electrolyte. Typical electrode thicknesses were in the range of 1.5 to 5 μm.

Cyclic voltammetry of the P3HT-b-PEO/V2O5|Li half-cell was carried out in the range of 2–3.8 V vs. Li/Li+ at a scan rate 0.1 mV/s for various polymer loadings, Fig. 3a. For V2O5, two distinct redox peaks appear at around 3.0 and 2.5 V in the cathodic/anodic scans consistent with insertions at a- and b-sites26,38,39. For compositions above 10 wt% P3HT-b-PEO, the current decreased significantly, suggesting diminished electrochemical activity. For V2O5 alone (Fig. 3b), as the scan rate increased, the V2O5 voltammogram became distorted, obscuring the higher voltage peak. On the other hand for P10 (Fig. 3c), little distortion was observed, suggestive of reduced Ohmic overpotential and increased accessibility of lithium ions into the xerogel40. The P3HT redox peak was observed only at very high polymer loadings; in Figure S10, P50 exhibited a small P3HT redox peak at 3.3 V21.

Figure 3
figure 3

Cyclic voltammograms of (a) all compositions at 0.1 mV/sec, (b) V2O5 at various scan rates and (c) P10 at various scan rates. All samples were approximately 4 μm in thickness. (d) Charge-discharge behavior of V2O5, P5, P10 and P15 electrodes at 0.1 C-rate and (e) incremental capacity (dQ/dV) taken from Fig. 3d. (f) Charge-discharge behavior at varying C-rates (0.1 to 5C) for a P10 cathode. For panels a–f, data were obtained from a two-electrode half-cell with lithium metal anode and 1 M LiTFSI in propylene carbonate. The capacity is based on mass of V2O5. (g) A schematic illustration of the assembled flexible half-cell using the P5 hybrid cathode and digital images of (h) the flexible battery as-assembled. (i) The flexible half-cell lights an LED while bending (also see Movie S4).

Figure 3d shows five galvanostatic charge-discharge cycles for P3HT-b-PEO/V2O5 hybrid electrodes of various compositions at a discharge rate of 0.1 C. From 3.8 to 2.0 V, a sloping discharge profile was obtained, typical of V2O5 xerogels41,42,43,44,45. The b-site Li+ intercalation reaction (at ~2.5 V) was also observed during cycling. V2O5 alone exhibited an average discharge capacity and Coulombic efficiency of 220.9 mAh g−1 and 99.4%, respectively. As the polymer content increased, the capacity decreased (P5: 193.3 mAh g−1 and P10: 187.2 mAh g−1) and the Coulombic efficiency decreased only slightly (P5: 99.5% and P10: 98.8%). The P5 electrode exhibited only a slight decrease in capacity relative to the pure V2O5 electrode, whereas the P15 exhibited a much larger decrease (100.2 mAh g−1). We also examined a thicker P10 electrode, where it was found that capacity dropped from 187.2 mAh g−1 to 40 mAh g−1 (5 um vs. 50 um, respectively), which we attribute to diffusion limitations in thicker electrodes. The derivative of the galvanostatic cycle was taken with respect to voltage to obtain the incremental capacity, Fig. 3e. The peaks displayed were similar to those observed in cyclic voltammograms. Cycling was also conducted at various C-rates, in which a drop in capacity with increasing C-rate was observed, Fig. 3f. From electrochemical impedance spectroscopy at 2.6 V vs. Li/Li+, where V2O5 is particularly active, the diffusion coefficients (DLi+) were calculated for V2O5, P5 and P10 cathodes46,47,48, Figure S11. The diffusion coefficient increased with polymer content, suggesting that lithium ion diffusion was enhanced by the P3HT-b-PEO diblock copolymer (DLi+ of V2O5, P5 and P10: 0.85 × 10−11, 1.64 × 10−11 and 2.09 × 10−11 cm2/s, respectively). A full study of the charge storage mechanism as a function of polymer content is underway.

To demonstrate the union of good mechanical properties with energy storage, we constructed a prototype flexible half-cell, Fig. 3h,i. The flexible battery was assembled with lithium ribbon as the anode and a P5 hybrid electrode as the cathode. Celgard film and 1 M LiTFSI in propylene carbonate were used as the separator film and electrolyte. Polydimethylsiloxane film with 1 mm thickness was used as packaging. To seal the cell more firmly, a polyimde film was used. The battery was repeated bent and flexed and the LED light maintained its illumination, Fig. 3i and Movie S4.

V2O5 is very sensitive to cycling, in which changes in volume have led to reduced cycle life and irreversible damage to the electrode. Post-mortem SEM analysis of our electrodes after cycling illustrate cracks and digital images show large-scale flaking of the electrode, Fig. 4a,b and Figure S12. However with just 5 wt% polymer, the formation of cracks and flakes appears to be completely arrested. Accelerated cycling (Fig. 4c, Figure S13-S14) demonstrates a gradual capacity fade for V2O5, but P5 and P10 do not. Instead, the capacity of P5 and P10 gradually increases as electrolyte penetrates into the film with each cycle. After 100 cycles, the discharge capacity P5 and P10 electrodes exceeds that of V2O5. Furthermore, the Coulombic efficiency is enhanced for the P5 and P10 electrodes. These results demonstrate that the polymer acts as a good binder and only a small amount is required to achieve good cyclability.

Figure 4
figure 4

(a) Digital images of hybrid electrodes and (b) SEM images of hybrid electrodes after CV test. (c) Cycling behavior of V2O5, P5 and P10 electrodes at a discharge rate of 1C.

Figure 5 shows an Ashby plot of specific energy vs. toughness, summarizing data from the literature and data presented here. Since our focus in this study is the electrode, we present electromechanical properties for the electrode alone. Our electrodes show a good combination of both mechanical and electrochemical properties as compared to Buckypaper (SWNT5,6 and MWNT7,8), reduced graphene oxide paper9,10,12, graphite on super-aligned CNTs12, TiO2 on activated carbon fabric12, V2O5 wires13 and polypyrrole (ppy)-coated V2O5 wires13, Table S3. In the context of structural energy, it is important to note that one desires to maximize both mechanical and electrochemical properties. From the results, it is clear that it is very difficult to get both exceptional mechanical properties and electrochemical performance in one single electrode. One property often comes at the cost of another. One example of this here is with polymer content, in which increasing the polymer content enhances mechanical properties at the cost of capacity or energy. Still, for applications where both properties are desired it is more practical to find an electrode that marries the two even if there exists a trade-off.

Figure 5
figure 5

An Ashby plot of specific energy vs. toughness.

Specific energy is reported as per mass of electrode. Data are taken from literature, discussed in main text and data presented herein.


This paper outlines a simple, water-based route to self-assemble diblock copolymers bearing electron- and ion-conducting blocks with V2O5 to form a flexible hybrid battery cathode. Only a small amount of the diblock copolymer is required to realize significant gains in mechanical properties without significantly sacrificing electrochemical properties. Further, this polymer halted the progression of mechanical failure, a common problem for V2O5 electrodes, which suffer from severe volume expansion. In the context of structural energy and power, in which one must balance mechanical with electrochemical properties, these electrodes are particularly interesting. They are far more flexible than V2O5 alone and they exhibit mechanical properties comparable with that of Bucky paper and reduced graphene oxide paper. Our future work will detail the morphology and structure of the electrode, along with a detailed analysis of charge storage mechanisms.



Vanadium pentoxide, lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI), poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVdF, molecular weight = 534,000 g/mol), N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) and propylene carbonate (PC) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Lithium ribbon was purchased from Alfa Aesar. All chemicals were used as received. 316 stainless steel coins used as substrates were purchased from MTI Corporation. Water was purified to 18.2 MΩ-cm (Milli-Q, Millipore). PEO-OH was purchased from from Aldrich (lot# BCBB1016, 7.17 kg mol−1 by 1H NMR).

Synthesis of V2O5 xerogel and P3HT-b-PEO block copolymer

Described in the Supplementary Information.

Preparation of polymer suspensions

A VWR Symphony ultrasonic cleaner (VWR Model 97043-936, 35 kHz) was used to prepare the polymer dispersion. P3HT-b-PEO suspensions were made by sonicating the polymer and LiTFSI in Milli-Q water at 0 °C to make a 4 mg/mL stock solution. The molar ratio of ethylene oxide units to lithium ions was 0.085. Before making composites, aliquots of 4 mg/mL P3HT-b-PEO solutions were diluted to 1 mg/mL. Hydrodynamic diameter was determined using dynamic light scattering (DLS) (ZetasizerNano ZS90, Malvern) at 25 °C. For DLS, the P3HT-b-PEO solution was diluted to 0.05 mg/ml.

Cathode preparation

Before use, 316 stainless steel coins (12 mm diameter × 1.6 mm thickness) were cleansed via sonication for 15 minutes each in dichloromethane, acetone, water and isopropanol, followed by drying under vacuum overnight at room temperature. Composites were made by mixing together appropriate volumes of 1 mg/mL P3HT-b-PEO (diluted from 4 mg/mL solutions) and 16.7 mg/mL V2O5 xerogel solutions in Milli-Q water. These solutions were drop-cast on stainless steel coins by depositing 0.97–1.12 mg worth of material (polymer + V2O5) onto the surface. Hereafter, electrodes containing X wt% polymers will be called “PX”. After drying in air, the cathodes were held under vacuum at 90 °C for 16 hours. For the electrodes containing PVdF, these were prepared by mixing V2O5 with PVdF in NMP. The mixture was cast as before and allowed to dry at 70 °C for three hours and then 90 °C overnight under vacuum.

Cathode morphologies were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JEOL JSM-7500F). Grazing incidence wide angle x-ray scattering measurements were carried out on Sector 8-ID-E at Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory49. Beamline 8-ID-E operates at an energy of 7.35 keV and images were collected from a Pilatus 1MF camera (Dectris), with two exposures for different vertical position of the detector. After flatfield correction for detector nonuniformity, the images are combined to fill in the gaps for rows at the borders between modules, leaving dark only the columns of inactive pixels at the center. Using the GIXSGUI package50 for Matlab (Mathworks), data are corrected for x-ray polarization, detector sensitivity and geometrical solid-angle. The beam size is 200 μm (h) × 20 μm (v). Sample detector distance is 204 mm. Sample measurement and thermal annealing were carried out under vacuum which is in the range of 2 ~ 3 × 10−6 bar, with the sample stage interfaced with a Lakeshore 340 unit.

Cell assembly and measurement

Electrochemical measurements were performed in two electrode cells (Tomcell Japan Co., Ltd.) assembled in a water-free, oxygen-free, argon-filled glovebox (MBraun) using lithium metal anodes. 1.0 M LiTFSI in propylene carbonate was used as the electrolyte and Celgard 3501 was used as the separator. Cyclic voltammetry, galvanostatic measurements and impedance spectroscopy were performed using a Gamry Interface 1000, Solartron SI 1287 and Solartron 1470E.

Free-standing film preparation and mechanical testing

P3HT-b-PEO/V2O5 mixtures were cast onto polystyrene weigh-boats (VWR), followed by air-drying. Following isolation from the weigh-boat, the hybrid electrodes were cut into rectangular strips of approximately 1 mm × 18 mm for testing. Static mechanical tensile tests were performed using a dynamic mechanical analyzer (DMA-Q800, TA Instruments). All tensile tests were conducted in controlled-force mode with a strain rate of 0.2%/min and preload of 0.02N.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: An, H. et al. Highly Flexible Self-Assembled V2O5 Cathodes Enabled by Conducting Diblock Copolymers. Sci. Rep. 5, 14166; doi: 10.1038/srep14166 (2015).