Abstract
Homogeneous nucleation from an undercooled iron melt is investigated by the statistical sampling of millionatom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations performed on a graphics processing unit (GPU). Fifty independent instances of isothermal MD calculations with one million atoms in a quasitwodimensional cell over a nanosecond reveal that the nucleation rate and the incubation time of nucleation as functions of temperature have characteristic shapes with a nose at the critical temperature. This indicates that thermally activated homogeneous nucleation occurs spontaneously in MD simulations without any inducing factor, whereas most previous studies have employed factors such as pressure, surface effect and continuous cooling to induce nucleation. Moreover, further calculations over ten nanoseconds capture the microstructure evolution on the order of tens of nanometers from the atomistic viewpoint and the grain growth exponent is directly estimated. Our novel approach based on the concept of “melting pots in a supercomputer” is opening a new phase in computational metallurgy with the aid of rapid advances in computational environments.
Introduction
It is important to precisely control the microstructures of metals and alloys during solidification since they directly affect the properties of metal and alloy products. In spite of considerable effot from both fundamental and industrial viewpoints^{1,2}, it is still not straightforward to control solidification microstructures since the solidification is affected by many aspects of physics such as heat transfer, convection and solute diffusion. Moreover, it is difficult to observe these processes directly by an experimental approach. Therefore, computational studies have contributed to our understanding of the nature of the solidification process. Formerly, Monte Carlo (MC) simulations based on the Potts model^{3} were carried out to study the kinetics of grain growth^{4,5} and they became popular in the investigation of solidification, grain coarsening and recrystallization^{6,7}. In 1993, the phasefield model based on the variational principle of the GinzburgLandau free energy was successfully used to reproduce a dendrite structure^{8}. Since then, the phasefield model^{9,10,11} has entered mainstream use for the simulation of solidification^{12} and its range of application now covers the competition between bundles of dendrites, including selection, regularity and segregation^{13,14}. In addition, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have contributed to the estimation of thermodynamic properties related to solidification^{15,16,17} as well as to the understanding of morphological dynamics during solidification^{18,19}. Computational metallurgy now covers a wide range of phenomena associated with solidification and microstructure evolution, assisted by the recent progress in highperformance computational environments.
One of the remaining problems in computational metallurgy is how to treat nucleation. In most previous phasefield and MC simulations on solidification and microstructure evolution, the nuclei in the melt are specified in advance as having a random distribution or are forcibly formed in line with an assumption based on classical nucleation theory. That is, it is not straightforward to investigate nucleation itself by performing phasefield and MC simulations. On the other hand, it is possible in principle to achieve nucleation in MD simulations if the undercooled melt is kept unchanged for a longer time than the incubation time of nucleation. Actually, the nucleation in small metal nanoparticles has been achieved in an MD simulation by continuous cooling^{20,21}, although nucleation in the nanoparticles occurred only once or at most a few times. Moreover, there have been several pioneering works, in which the nucleation was achieved in a largescale system with the aid of inducing factors such as pressureinduced^{22} and surfaceinduced solidification^{23}. However, a broad spatiotemporal scale is required to achieve spontaneous (i.e., thermally activated) nucleation, which is computationally demanding. Therefore, it is not yet straightforward to investigate spontaneous homogeneous nucleation, even by MD simulation, without an inducing factor.
Under such circumstances, we have developed our own code for carrying out MD simulations on a graphics processing unit (GPU), which enables the handling of one million atoms in MD simulations over a period of nanoseconds and has a computation time of several days^{24,25}. Using this code on a GPU architecture, we successfully revealed the spontaneous evolution of anisotropy in a solid nucleus during the solidification of iron comprising one million atoms^{19}. These new insights obtained using the powerful MD tool inspired the idea of directly capturing the nature of nucleation by statistical sampling of a largescale MD simulation. To this end, spontaneous nucleation from an undercooled melt of iron and the subsequent microstructure evolution are investigated by the statistical sampling of isothermal MD calculations with one million atoms performed on the GPU supercomputer, TSUBAME2.5.
Results and Discussion
Atomic configuration during nucleation and grain growth
Nucleation and subsequent grain growth are achieved by isothermal holding of a simulation cell filled with an iron melt consisting of 1,037,880 atoms (Fig. 1) at various undercooling temperatures between 900 and 1800 K with 100 K intervals. Since the melting point of bcc iron given by the Finnis−Sinclair (FS) potential employed here is 2400 K^{26}, which is higher than the experimental value of 1811 K, temperatures are normalized by the melting point given by the FS potential, T_{m} = 2400 K.
Figure 2 shows snapshots of the atomic configuration during nucleation and subsequent grain growth at 0.67T_{m}, 0.58T_{m} and 0.50T_{m}, which are representative results from the five replicate calculations for each temperature. Videos of these processes are available in Supplementary Information. In the case of 0.67T_{m}, one nucleus is nucleated at a time between 200 and 300 ps and grows into a spherical grain in the melt. Another nucleus is then formed near the edge of the spherical grain and is surrounded by the previously nucleated grain at 500 ps. On the other hand, many nuclei are simultaneously nucleated before 200 ps at 0.58T_{m}, which results in the formation of a microstructure consisting of fine grains. As time goes by, some small grains disappear, as highlighted by yellow circles in Fig. 2. In the case of 0.50T_{m}, three nuclei are nucleated at approximately 200 ps and grow into spherical grains. Other nuclei are then formed from the remaining melt and laternucleated grains fill the spaces between previously nucleated grains. The obtained microstructure consists of larger grains than those at 0.58T_{m}. It is expected from the snapshots that there is a critical temperature near 0.58T_{m} at which the incubation time of nucleation becomes minimum. Similarly, the nucleation rate should become maximum and therefore the grain size should become minimum around the critical temperature.
Nucleation rate
Nucleation rate per 1 ns, i.e., the number of nucleations in the calculation cell during 1000 ps (1 ns) calculation, is shown as a function of temperature in Fig. 3. The average number obtained from the five replicate calculations for each temperature is plotted with error bars showing the standard deviation. The curve connecting the plots has a characteristic shape with a nose at the critical temperature. According to classical nucleation theory for homogeneous nucleation, the rate of formation of homogeneous nuclei I is expressed as^{2}
where T is the temperature, σ_{SL} is the solidliquid interfacial energy, ρ is the density, ΔS_{f} is the entropy of fusion, ΔT is the undercooling temperature (ΔT = T_{m} − T) and k_{B} is the Boltzmann constant. The prefactor I_{0} is the product of the atomic vibration frequency, the probability of capturing an atom at the surface and the number density of the liquid, none of which are strongly temperaturedependent. Therefore, the nucleation rate strongly depends on the temperature through the two competing term in the denominator of the exponential in equation (1). The nucleation rate increases rapidly with increasing undercooling temperature ΔT (i.e., decreasing temperature), which corresponds to a decrease in the nucleation energy barrier. On the other hand, the mobility of atoms decreases with decreasing temperature since the mobility of atoms is assumed to be a thermally activated process with the MaxwellBoltzmann distribution. These competing effects result in the nose shape when the nucleation rate is plotted against temperature.
Since the nucleation rate as a function of temperature obtained from the MD simulation has a characteristic shape with a nose at the critical temperature, it is expected that thermally activated homogeneous nucleation will occur spontaneously in the MD simulation. The nucleation rate takes a maximum value of 31.5 per 1 ns in the simulation cell at 0.58 T_{m}, which is equivalent to 2.56 × 10^{33} (m^{−3} s^{−1}). Since the typical nucleation rate for the homogeneous nucleation of a pure metal near the critical temperature has been estimated to be on the order of 10^{30} to 10^{40} (m^{−3} s^{−1})^{2}, the value estimated from the MD simulation is reasonable. In general, it is not straightforward to directly estimate the nucleation energy barrier by the atomic simulation. Regarding this matter, Auer and Frenkel^{27} have discussed the discrepancy in the nucleation rate from those obtained using classical nucleation theory and the hardsphere model. One of the reasons for the difficulty in estimating the nucleation rate by atomic simulation is the variety of structures in the nuclei. Gebauer et al.^{28} examined a prenucleation cluster, which can be amorphous or have different crystal structures from the bulkphase structure. In this study, only the bcc structure is considered for the nucleus for simplicity, which is the same as the structure in the bulk phase. We note that it is not straightforward to precisely define the structure of a nucleus at a high temperature, which is therefore beyond the scope of this study.
Incubation time of nucleation
Next, the incubation time of the first nucleation is shown as a function of temperature in Fig. 4(a). Similarly to the nucleation rate, the average number obtained from the five replicate calculations for each temperature is plotted with error bars showing the standard deviation except for the case of 0.71T_{m}. At 0.71T_{m}, no nucleation occurs in all five replicate calculations over 1000 ps. Therefore, further calculations are performed up to 10000 ps for all five replicate cells. Nucleation occurs at 9250 ps in one of the five replicate calculations, which is plotted in the diagram with an open circle. The curve connecting the plots has a characteristic shape of a timetemperaturetransformation (TTT) curve (called the Ccurve) with a nose at the critical temperature, as in the case of the nucleation rate. It is known that there is a complementary relationship between the nucleation rate and the incubation time of nucleation^{2}, which have a relationship with the mirror symmetry. That is, the incubation time of nucleation t_{n} is defined by the inverse of the nucleation rate I in Equation (1) as^{2}
Therefore, the incubation time as a function of temperature also has a nose owing to the two competing factors described above. The above discussion applies to our results in Figs 3 and 4(a), which generally have mirror symmetry, although the critical temperature does not match perfectly.
The TTT diagram is useful for predicting the final structure obtained by continuous cooling of the melt at a constant cooling rate. The dashed lines in Fig. 4(a) show continuous cooling transformation (CCT) lines for cooling rates of 1 × 10^{13} and 2 × 10^{12} K/s across 0.71T_{m} at 50 ps. The CCT line for 1 × 10^{13} K/s avoids the nose of the TTT curve and therefore continuous cooling along this line should result in the formation of a glassy structure since no nucleation occurs to the left of the TTT curve. On the other hand, the CCT line for 2 × 10^{12} K/s intersects the TTT curve, which means that a bcc crystal should be formed when the melt is cooled along this line. To confirm this, a further calculation is performed, in which continuous cooling along these CCT lines is assumed. Figure 4(b) shows snapshots of the final structures obtained by continuous cooling along the dashed lines in Fig. 4(a). A glassy structure is formed by continuous cooling with a rate of 1 × 10^{13} K/s, whereas bcc crystalline grains are formed with a cooling rate of 2 × 10^{12} K/s. This result agrees with the prediction from the TTT diagram. Moreover, it is consistent with a previous MD simulation of the solidification of molybdenum nanoparticles^{29}, in which the threshold cooling rate for the forming of glassy or crystalline nanoparticles lies between 10^{12} and 10^{13} K/s. On the other hand, this cooling rate is much higher than typical values obtained from experiments^{2}. We emphasize here that the cooling rate on the order of 10^{12} K/s is for the case of ideal homogeneous nucleation from the melt of a monatomic metal, whereas most metallic glasses have an alloy composition. Interestingly, in recent experiments, monatomic metallic glasses of Ta and V have been formed through ultrafast liquid quenching with a cooling rate of 10^{14} K/s^{30}. Therefore, it is reasonable that the critical nucleation rate for a monatomic metallic glass is on the order of 10^{13} K/s. Moreover, the effect of impurities and other external inducers is not negligible in the most actual experiments, which causes heterogeneous nucleation^{2}.
Microstructure evolution
Snapshots of representative atomic configurations and the grain size distribution after 1000 ps calculation for each temperature are shown in Supplementary Information (Figs S1 and S2). In general, the average grain size becomes minimum around the critical temperature. However, it is not easy to find a clear trend in the grain size distribution from the results, although it is generally known that the grain size has a lognormal size distribution^{4}. It is considered that the microstructure obtained after 1000 ps calculation is still undergoing grain coarsening. Therefore, the subsequent microstructure evolution is closely investigated by performing a further calculation up to 10000 ps for the finest grain structure in Fig. 2 (at 0.58T_{m}).
Figure 5(a) shows snapshots of the atomic configuration during grain coarsening in the 10000 ps calculation at 0.58T_{m}. The grain size distributions corresponding to the snapshots are shown in Fig. 5(b). It is confirmed from both the snapshots and the grain size distributions that most of the small grains of size less than 10 nm (labeled asterisks, squares and triangles) that appear at 300 ps shrink and disappear before 10000 ps has elapsed. On the other hand, large grains (such as those labeled A, B and C) become larger, which can be regarded as grain coarsening. The small grains that disappear at an early stage (labeled by asterisks) are disproportionately distributed in the area where solidification occurs late in the nucleation process as shown in Fig. 2, in contrast to the random distribution. Therefore, grains that nucleate earlier are more likely to survive during the evolution of the microstructure.
As shown in Fig. 5(b), the mean grain size increases during grain coarsening. It is expected from the theory of curvaturedriven growth^{31} that the mean grain size follows a power law of the form , where is the mean grain size, k is the constant of proportionality, t is the time and n is the grain growth exponent. According to the theory of curvaturedriven growth, the grain growth exponent is 0.5. Figure 5(c) shows a double logarithmic plot of the mean grain size as a function of time. From the slope of the fitted line, the grain growth exponent is estimated to be approximately 0.18, which is smaller than the theoretical value^{31}. However, smaller values (0.375^{4}, 0.25^{32}) for the grain growth exponent have been obtained by MC^{4,32} and phasefield^{33} simulations. The discrepancy in the grain growth exponent has been investigated from various aspects. For example, the anisotropy in the grain boundary energy^{32,33} and the mobility^{33} is considered to decrease the grain growth exponent. Moreover, the number of grains should affect the grain growth exponent^{5}. In addition, the discrepancy in our case may also be due to the effect of the quasitwodimensional system. That is, the mean grain size reaches approximately four times the thickness of the calculation system in our calculation, which have affected the result. Physical factors affecting the grain growth exponent will be investigated in future.
Finally, the potential energy of the calculation system as a function of time is shown in Fig. 6. The potential energy decreases monotonically during the grain coarsening, which is considered to be due to the decrease of the area of the grain boundary, since the existence of a grain boundary causes an excess energy (i.e., grain boundary energy) of 0.5 to 2.0 Jm^{−2} depending on the orientation^{26}. Therefore, it is concluded that the decrease in the grain boundary energy is the main driving force of grain coarsening at this stage.
Conclusion
By the statistical sampling of a millionatom MD simulation, nucleation and the subsequent grain growth in an undercooled iron melt are closely investigated. The nucleation rate and the incubation time of nucleation as functions of temperature have characteristic shapes with a nose at the critical temperature, which indicates the thermally activated homogeneous nucleation. Further calculations along the CCT lines in the TTT diagram yielded glassy and crystalline structures depending on the cooling rate, in agreement with the prediction based on the TTT diagram. Moreover, the subsequent microstructure evolution was investigated by further calculations over ten nanoseconds, from which the grain growth exponent was directly estimated.
Given that most MD studies still achieve nucleation forcibly using an inducing factor for the sake of computational efficiency, it is significant that the spontaneous homogeneous nucleation was achieved in this study without the use of inducing factor owing to the acceleration of the MD simulation, which was performed on a GPU supercomputer. Although a single GPU computation can perform a millionatom MD simulation, multiGPU computation will increase the possibility of further largescale simulations. MultiGPU computation has already been successfully used for a very large scale phasefield simulation of the growth of dendrite assemblages^{34}. This technique will be applied in very large scale MD simulation in the near future.
Methods
Molecular dynamics simulation
The classical MD method is employed to investigate the nucleation and microstructure evolution from the undercooled melt. The simulation methodology basically follows previous studies^{19,24,25}. The Finnis–Sinclair (FS) potential^{35} is employed for the interatomic potential between iron atoms, which is one of the most established potentials for bodycenteredcubic (bcc) metals. It has been confirmed in previous studies that the FS potential can accurately reproduce the thermodynamic and kinetic properties of the solid–liquid interface of bcc metals at high temperatures^{16,36}. The total energy E of the FS potential is expressed as
where V is the repulsive term, r_{ij} is the bond length between atoms i and j, ρ is the total electronic charge density at the site of atom i, which is constructed by the rigid superposition of atomic charge densities ϕ, A is the binding energy, c_{0}, c_{1} and c_{2} are free parameters used for fitting experimental data, c and d are cutoff parameters assumed to lie between the secondnearest and thirdnearestneighbor atoms and β is a parameter used to introduce the maximum value of ϕ within the firstnearestneighbor distance. The parameters for bcc iron from the original FS paper are employed^{35} (Table 1). A leapfrog method is used to integrate the classical equation of motion with a time step of 5.0 fs. A Berendsen thermostat^{37} is applied to control the temperature in each step and the Andersen method^{38} is applied to independently control the pressure in each direction.
Calculation procedure
The initial configuration of the calculation system (Fig. 1) is prepared by heating a bcc crystal of iron of size 53.4 × 4.3 × 53.4 nm (186 × 15 × 186 unit cell, 1,037,880 atoms) at 3500 K with the NVT constant ensemble. We note that the calculation system is highly anisotropic in the plane, so is therefore regarded as a quasitwodimensional system. The periodic boundary condition is employed for all boundaries. The prepared initial configuration is annealed isothermally in the main calculation for 1000 ps under zero pressure (NPT constant ensemble) at various temperatures between 900 and 1800 K with 100 K intervals. To measure the incubation time of nucleation, further calculations up to 3000 and 10000 ps are performed at 1000 and 1700 K, respectively. For each temperature, five replicate calculations are performed to gather statistics. The main calculations are carried out on the GPU supercomputer, TSUBAME2.5 at Tokyo Institute of Technology with the original code developed with a CUDA 3.0^{24,25}.
Configuration analysis
The atomic configurations obtained from the main calculation are closely analyzed as follows to identify the solid and liquid structures. The metal atoms with the bcc configuration are determined by considering the coordination numbers of the first and secondnearestneighbor atoms using two cutoff lengths^{21}. That is, atoms satisfying the following two conditions are identified as having the bcc configuration: (i) 8 neighbor atoms within a cutoff length of 2.75 Å, which is between the first and secondnearestneighbor atoms of the bcc crystal and (ii) 14 neighbor atoms within another cutoff length of 3.4 Å, which is between the second and thirdnearestneighbor atoms of the bcc crystal. The cutoff lengths were chosen on the basis of our previous study^{21}. The atoms defined as being in the bcc configuration are colored in red and the other atoms are colored in white in all figures. Although the determination of the bcc configuration at a high temperature includes an inherent error due to thermal vibration, it is sufficiently accurate to distinguish the bcc crystalline region from the melt and the grain boundaries as shown in the snapshots.
Image analysis to obtain grain size distribution
The grain sizes in the snapshots are measured by image analysis using ImageJ^{39}, which is widely known software for image analysis. Here, the area of a grain A is estimated by manually tracing the corresponding grain boundary with a polygonal line. The estimated area is then converted into the effective diameter D_{eff} under the assumption that the grain is spherical using
In this study, the effective diameter is adopted as the grain size.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Shibuta, Y. et al. Homogeneous nucleation and microstructure evolution in millionatom molecular dynamics simulation. Sci. Rep. 5, 13534; doi: 10.1038/srep13534 (2015).
References
Kurz, W. & Fisher D. J. Fundamentals of Solidification (Trans Tech Publications, Aedermannsdorf, 1998).
Dantzig, J. A. & Rappaz M. Solidification (EPFL Press, Lausanne, 2009).
Potts, R. B. Some generalized orderdisorder transformations. Math. Proc. 48, 106−109 (1952).
Srolovitz, D. J., Anderson, M. P., Grest, G. S. & Sahni, P. S. Grain growth in two dimensions. Scr. Metall. 17, 241−246 (1983).
Anderson, M. P., Srolovitz, D. J., Grest, G. S. & Sahni P. S. Computer simulation of grain growth−I. Kinetics. Acta Metall. 32, 783−791 (1984).
Godfrey, A. W. & Martin J. W. Some Monte Carlo studies of grain growth in a temperature gradient. Philos. Mag. A 72, 737−749 (1995).
Koseki, T., Inoue, H., Fukuda, Y. & Nogami, A. Numerical simulation of equiaxed grain formation in weld solidification. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 4, 183–195 (2003).
Kobayashi, R. Modeling and numerical simulations of dendritic crystal growth. Physica D 63 410–423 (1993).
Karma, A. & Rappel, W.J. Quantitative phasefield modeling of dendritic growth in two and three dimensions. Phys. Rev. E 57 4323–4349 (1996).
Kim, S. G., Kim, W. T. & Suzuki, T. Phasefield model for binary alloys. Phys. Rev. E 60, 7186–7197 (1999).
Ohno, M. Quantitative phasefield modeling of nonisothermal solidification in dilute multicomponent alloys with arbitrary diffusivities. Phys. Rev. E 86, 051603 (2012).
Takaki, T. Phasefield Modeling and Simulations of Dendrite Growth. ISIJ Int. 54, 437–444 (2014).
Li, J., Wang, Z., Wang, Y. & Wang, J. Phasefield study of competitive dendritic growth of converging grains during directional solidification. Acta Mater. 60, 1478–1493 (2012).
Takaki, T., Ohno, M., Shimokawabe, T. & Aoki, T. Phasefield study of competitive dendritic growth of converging grains during directional solidification. Acta Mater. 81, 272–283 (2014).
Sun, D. Y., Asta, M. & Hoyt, J. J. Crystalmelt interfacial free energies and mobilities in fcc and bcc Fe. Phys. Rev. B 69, 174103 (2004).
Watanabe, Y., Shibuta, Y. & Suzuki, T. A molecular dynamics study of thermodynamic and kinetic properties of solid–liquid interface for bcc iron. ISIJ Int. 50, 1158–1164 (2010).
Asadi, E., Zaeem, M. A., Nouranian & Baskes, M. I. S. Quantitative modeling of the equilibration of twophase solidliquid Fe by atomistic simulations on diffusive time scales. Phys. Rev. B 91, 024105 (2015).
Berghoff, M., Selzer, M. & Nestler, B. PhaseField Simulations at the Atomic Scale in Comparison to Molecular Dynamics. Sci. World J. 2013, 564272 (2013).
Shibuta, Y., Oguchi, K. & Ohno, M. Millionatom molecular dynamics simulation on spontaneous evolution of anisotropy in solid nucleus during solidification of iron. Scr. Mater. 86 20–23 (2014).
Shibuta, Y. & Suzuki, T. Melting and nucleation of iron nanoparticles: A molecular dynamics study. Chem. Phys. Lett. 445, 265–270 (2007).
Shibuta, Y. & Suzuki, T. A molecular dynamics study of the phase transition in bcc metal nanoparticles. J. Chem. Phys. 129, 144102 (2008).
Streitz, F. H., Glosli, J. N. & Patel, M. V. Beyond FiniteSize Scaling in Solidification Simulations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 225701 (2006).
Li, T., Donadio, D., Ghiringhelli, L. M. & Galli, G. Surfaceinduced crystallization in supercooled tetrahedral liquids. Nat. Mater. 8, 726–730 (2009).
Oguchi, K., Shibuta, Y. & Suzuki, T. Accelerating molecular dynamics simulation performed on GPU J. Jpn. Inst. Met. 76, 462–467 (2012).
Shibuta, Y., Oguchi, K. & Suzuki, T. Largescale molecular dynamics study on evolution of grain boundary groove of iron. ISIJ Int. 52, 2205–2209 (2012).
Shibuta, Y., Takamoto, S. & Suzuki, T. A molecular dynamics study of the energy and structure of the symmetric tilt boundary of iron. ISIJ Int. 48, 1582–1591 (2008).
Auer, S. & Frenkel, D. Prediction of absolute crystal nucleation rate in hardsphere colloids. Nature 409, 1020–1023 (2001).
Gebauer, D., Kellermeier, M., Gale, J. D., Bergström, L. & Cölfena, H. Prenucleation clusters as solute precursors in crystallization. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 2348–2371 (2014).
Shibuta, Y. & Suzuki, T. A molecular dynamics study of cooling rate during solidification of metal nanoparticles. Chem. Phys. Lett. 502, 82–86 (2011).
Zhong, L., Wang, J., Sheng, H., Zhang, Z. & Mao, S. X. Formation of monatomic metallic glasses through ultrafast liquid quenching. Nature 512, 177–180 (2014).
Hillert, M. On the theory of normal and abnormal grain growth. Acta Metall. 13, 227–238 (1965).
Grest, G. S., Srolovitz, D. J. & Anderson, M. P. Computer simulation of grain growth – IV. Anisotropic grain boundary energy. Acta Metall. 33, 509–520 (1985).
Kazaryan, A., Wang, Y., Dregia, S. A. & Patton B. R. Grain growth in anisotropic systems: comparison of effects of energy and mobility. Acta Mater. 50, 2491–2502 (2002).
Shibuta, Y., Ohno, M. & Takaki T. Solidification in supercomputer: from crystal nuclei to dendrite assemblages. JOM 67, 1793–1804 (2015).
Finnis, M. W. & Sinclair, J. E. A simple empirical Nbody potential for transition metals. Philos. Mag. A 50, 45–55 (1984).
Shibuta, Y., Watanabe, Y. & Suzuki T. Growth and melting of nanoparticles in liquid iron: a molecular dynamics study. Chem. Phys. Lett. 475, 264–268 (2009).
Berendsen, H. J. C., Postma, J. P. M., van Gunsteren, W. F., DiNola, A. & Haak, J. R. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 81 3684–3690 (1984).
Andersen, H. C. Molecular dynamics simulations at constant pressure and/or temperature. J. Chem. Phys. 72, 2384–2393 (1980).
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 (2012).
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by a GrantinAid for Scientific Research (B) (No. 25289266) from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) and the 23th ISIJ Research Promotion Grant from the Iron and Steel Institute of Japan (ISIJ). Part of this work was supported by the Joint Usage/Research Center for Interdisciplinary LargeScale Information Infrastructures (JHCPN) and the High Performance Computing Infrastructure (HPCI) in Japan for the computational environment. The authors would also like to thank Professor Toshio Suzuki for helpful discussions.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
Y.S., T.T. and M.O. designed the research. Y.S. and K.O. developed the MD simulation code executable on the GPU architecture. T.T. arranged the computational environment for the use of the supercomputer TSUBAME2.5. Y.S. performed the MD simulations and analyzed the data. Y.S., T.T. and M.O. wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Shibuta, Y., Oguchi, K., Takaki, T. et al. Homogeneous nucleation and microstructure evolution in millionatom molecular dynamics simulation. Sci Rep 5, 13534 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13534
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Further reading

Morphological aspect of crystal nucleation in wallconfined supercooled metallic film
Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter (2021)

Molecular dynamics simulations of spontaneous and seeded nucleation and theoretical calculations for zinc selenide
Computational Materials Science (2021)

Multiscale Modeling of Defect Phenomena in Platinum Using Machine Learning of Force Fields
JOM (2020)

Additives Control the Stability of Amorphous Calcium Carbonate via Two Different Mechanisms: Surface Adsorption versus Bulk Incorporation
Advanced Functional Materials (2020)

Machine learning approach to automated analysis of atomic configuration of molecular dynamics simulation
Computational Materials Science (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.