Gold nanorods are a promising nanoscale material in clinical diagnosis and treatment. The physicochemical properties of GNRs, including size, shape and surface features, are crucial factors affecting their cytotoxicity. In this study, we investigated the effects of different aspect ratios and surface modifications on the cytotoxicity and cellular uptake of GNRs in cultured cells and in mice. The results indicated that the surface chemistry but not the aspect ratio of GNRs mediates their biological toxicity. CTAB-GNRs with various aspect ratios had similar abilities to induce cell apoptosis and autophagy by damaging mitochondria and activating intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS). However, GNRs coated with CTAB/PSS, CTAB/PAH, CTAB/PSS/PAH or CTAB/PAH/PSS displayed low toxicity and did not induce cell death. CTAB/PAH-coated GNRs caused minimally abnormal cell morphology compared with CTAB/PSS and CTAB/PSS/PAH coated GNRs. Moreover, the intravenous injection of CTAB/PAH GNRs enabled the GNRs to reach tumor tissues through blood circulation in animals and remained stable, with a longer half-life compared to the other GNRs. Therefore, our results demonstrated that further coating can prevent cytotoxicity and cell death upon CTAB-coated GNR administration, similar to changing the GNR aspect ratio and CTAB/PAH coated GNRs show superior biological properties with better biocompatibility and minimal cytotoxicity.
In the past few decades, nanomaterials have been extensively studied and have shown many important potential applications in biomedicine. Owing to their good biocompatibility, relative ease of synthesis and special physicochemical properties, gold nanorods (GNRs) have become one of the most promising nanoscale materials for clinical diagnosis and treatment, such as near-infrared imaging (NIR), Raman signal enhancement, tumor photothermal therapy, molecular detection, biosensing and drug and gene delivery1,2,3,4,5,6,7. Compared with conventional spherical nanoparticles, GNRs have shown better properties for biomedical applications, particularly due to their unique optical features2,8,9. The optical properties of GNRs are controlled by their shape and degree of aggregation10. GNRs can exhibit variable plasmon bands depending on their aspect ratio (length/width ratio)11.
Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) is the most convenient and common surfactant for the synthesis of long gold nanorods. CTAB not only allows further surface modification but also can be used as a surfactant stabilizer for synthesis and deposition. Seed-mediated methods using CTAB result in tightly packed CTAB bilayers on the surfaces of the gold nanorods; this positively charged layer creates mutual repulsions and prevents aggregation, keeping the nanorods in a stable form. However, CTAB is a highly toxic cationic surfactant12,13. Synthetic GNRs with CTAB conjugates are toxic to cultured cells and to animals14,15,16. Although many reports have shown that the toxicity of colloidal GNRs depends on the particle concentration, size, shape, surface modification and even coating methods and medium16,17,18,19,20, studies examining the in vitro and in vivo toxicity of GNRs are rare and controversial. A comparison of the toxicity of gold nanorods of various sizes and with different coatings would help to identify target sites that may be at risk from nanoparticle exposure.
The common biological method of evaluating toxicity is to measure cytotoxicity in vitro and systemic toxicity in vivo. Apoptosis (type I programmed cell death) and autophagy (type II programmed cell death) are the two most important forms of programmed cell death. Many chemotherapy drugs or other agents can effectively induce cell apoptosis or autophagy21,22,23,24, thus showing cytotoxicity. However, non-specific cytotoxicity, for example, toxicity against functioning, normal cells, will result in systemic side effects. The issues related to the potential toxicity of gold nanorods were studied in the early days of nanotechnology development. However, the potential toxicity and toxicity mechanisms of many types of gold nanorods is not fully understood.
In this study, we synthesized gold nanorods with different aspect ratios and surface modifications and investigated the influences of these physicochemical properties on cytotoxicity and cellular uptake in cultured cells and in mice. The results indicated that CTAB-coated GNRs, regardless of their aspect ratio, are relatively toxic, inducing cell apoptosis and autophagy. Damage to mitochondria and the activation of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) play roles in inducing cell apoptosis and autophagy. However, further modification of the surfaces of CTAB-coated GNRs with polystyrene sulfonate (PSS), poly allylamine hydrochloride (PAH), or both (PSS/PAH) dramatically decreased their toxicity. In vivo studies showed that GNRs coated with CTAB/PAH were less toxic to mice and these GNRs could be distributed to the liver, spleen, lungs and other tissues. Therefore, our results demonstrate that further coating could prevent mitochondria-mediated cell apoptosis and autophagy in response to CTAB-coated GNRs. Thus, surface chemistry and not aspect ratio mediates the biological toxicity of GNRs in vitro and in vivo.
Synthesis and characterization of GNRs
GNRs with different aspect ratios and different surface modifications were synthesized and characterized as described in the Materials and Methods section. The morphologies of CTAB-coated GNRs with four different aspect ratios were observed by TEM and designated as CTAB-1, CTAB-2, CTAB-3 and CTAB-4 according to increasing aspect ratio (Fig. 1a). Representative UV-Vis-NIR absorption spectra are shown in Fig. 1b. To examine the biocompatibility of the different GNR coatings, we synthesized polyelectrolyte-coated GNRs functionalized with CTAB/PSS, CTAB/PAH, CTAB/PSS/PAH and CTAB/PAH/PSS, which all displayed similar UV-Vis-NIR absorption spectra (Fig. 1c). The zeta potentials of these different GNRs showed that the CTAB-coated, CTAB/PAH-coated and CTAB/PSS/PAH coated GNRs were positively charged, while the CTAB/PSS-coated and CTAB/PAH/PSS-coated GNRs were negatively charged (Fig. 1d).
PSS and PAH are typical polyelectrolytes to form layers onto the CTAB-GNRs surface. The interactions between them and CTAB-GNRs have been well studied previously25,26,27. On the one hand, the polyanion PSS can electrostatically associate with the CTAB-coated GNRs. On the other hand, it has been reported that amines bind to gold nanoparticles through the amine functionality via a weak covalent bond28. Since PAH contains uncharged amine groups (-NH2), it can bind onto the CTAB-GNRs through the amine functionalities, despite having the same charge as the nanoparticles25,26,27.
Cytotoxicity of CTAB-GNRs on tumor cells and normal cells
To determine whether the CTAB-GNRs were toxic to cells, different types of tumor cells (HCT116, Huh7, PC3, Hela and BEL7402) and non-malignant transformed cells (HEK293T, L02 and HFF) were exposed to various concentrations of CTAB-GNRs (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 nM) for 24 hours and to 2 nM CTAB-GNRs for different times (24 h, 48 h, 72 h). Cell viability was determined by a trypan blue dye exclusion assay. The concentration- and time-dependent cytotoxicity of the particles could be observed (Fig. 2a–c), where maximal effects were found after 72 h of incubation at the highest CTAB-GNR concentration. Moreover, the cytotoxicity of the CTAB-GNRs toward tumor cells was higher than that toward non-malignant cells. Consistent with the cell viability results, phase microscopic analysis also showed that the CTAB-GNR-treated cells exhibited features of death (Fig. 2d). Therefore, the cell viability results indicated that the CTAB-GNRs are toxic to cultured cells.
CTAB-GNRs induce apoptosis in human tumor cells
Apoptosis is an important form of cell death and is the most common mechanism for targeted chemotherapies that induce cancer cell death29. To determine whether the CTAB-GNRs could trigger apoptosis, HCT116 and BEL7402 cells were treated with different concentrations of CTAB-GNRs (0.5, 1, 2, 4 nM) for 24 hours and with 2 nM CTAB-GNRs for different times (24, 48, 72 h). Apoptosis was evaluated by a sub-G1 assay after staining with propidium iodide (PI). The results indicated that the CTAB-GNRs induced dose-dependent apoptosis (Fig. 3a). Moreover, with increasing incubation time, the cytotoxicity of the CTAB-GNRs also increased (Fig. 3b). In agreement with the FACS analysis, a Western blot also indicated that the CTAB-GNRs activated the apoptotic proteins PARP and caspase-9 (Fig. 3c). These data suggested that the CTAB-GNRs’ cytotoxicity could be mediated through the induction of apoptosis.
CTAB-GNRs induce Akt-independent autophagy in human cells
Autophagy is a cellular process involved in protein and organelle degradation and in the recycling of cellular components to ensure survival during starvation and other stresses30,31. To investigate whether the CTAB-GNRs could induce autophagy in human non-malignant transformed cells (HEK293T, L02, HFF) or cancer cells (HCT116, BEL7402, PC3), we first examined the protein level of LC3-II, a cleaved form of LC3 that acts as an established molecular indicator of autophagy. As shown in Fig. 4a, Western blot analysis showed that 1 nM CTAB-GNR treatment significantly increased the LC3-II protein level in all detected cells. To further confirm the induction of cell autophagy by the CTAB-GNRs, HCT116 cells were treated with CTAB-GNRs for 24 h after being transfected with the EGFP-LC3 plasmid. Microscopic examination showed the characteristic punctate fluorescent pattern of LC3-GFP (Fig. 4b), suggesting the formation of autophagosomes and the occurrence of autophagy. Moreover, HCT116 cells stained with acridine orange after being treated with CTAB-GNRs showed considerable red fluorescence, suggesting the formation of numerous acidic autophagolysosome vacuoles (AVOs) (Fig. 4c). The above data demonstrated that the CTAB-GNRs could trigger autophagy in HCT116 cells.
Akt is a critical kinase that regulates downstream of mTOR and is involved in a variety of biological processes, including cell apoptosis and autophagy through transduction cascades32,33. Next, we investigated whether the autophagy of HCT116 cells induced by the CTAB-GNRs was mediated through Akt. As shown in Fig. 4d and e, although treatment with CTAB-GNRs decreased Akt activation, the overexpression of CA Akt did not rescue the GNR-induced autophagy. Therefore, these results indicate that Akt kinase was not involved in the CTAB-GNR-induced autophagy.
Mitochondria are involved in CTAB-GNR-induced autophagy
Mitochondrial homeostasis is critical in regulating cell physiology as well as cell survival, including during cell apoptosis and autophagy34,35. Next, we examined whether mitochondrial events were associated with the CTAB-GNR-induced autophagy. We detected changes in the mitochondrial membrane potential (∆ψm), which resulted from mitochondrial membrane depolarization and led to an increase in the permeability of the outer membrane. As shown in Fig. 5a, a ∆ψm decrease was observed in the HCT116 cells following CTAB-GNR treatment. A similar result was also obtained for the ATP level (Fig. 5b). However, cyclosporine A (CsA), a mitochondrial membrane potential stabilizer, at least partially abrogated CTAB-GNR-induced autophagy (Fig. 5c,d). These results therefore suggest that mitochondria are involved in CTAB-GNR-induced autophagy.
The autophagy induced by CTAB-GNRs is mediated through intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS)
ROS, which are mainly produced in the mitochondria, take part in the regulation of physiological cell signaling. Many studies have shown that ROS can induce cellular apoptosis and/or autophagy if produced excessively in certain types of cancer cells36,37,38. Thus, we next determined whether CTAB-GNR-induced autophagy is related to ROS activation in HCT116 cells. We measured the intracellular ROS generated by treatment of the HCT116 cells with various concentrations of CTAB-GNRs. As shown in Fig. 6a, dose-dependent ROS accumulation was observed. However, the free radical scavenger NAC markedly abrogated CTAB-GNR-induced ROS generation, which further confirms that the CTAB-GNRs caused intracellular ROS accumulation (Fig. 6b). Moreover, pretreatment with NAC for 1 h significantly decreased the LC3-II protein level and abolished the formation of acidic autophagolysosome vacuoles induced by the CTAB-GNRs (Fig. 6c,d), which suggested that NAC could rescue the cells from CTAB-GNR-induced autophagy. These data demonstrated that the autophagy induced by the CTAB-GNRs is mediated through the production of intracellular reactive oxygen species.
The cytotoxicity of CTAB-GNRs is independent of their aspect ratio
It has been reported that the cellular uptake of gold nanorods is highly dependent on their aspect ratio17,39. To determine whether the cytotoxicity of CTAB-GNRs is associated with their aspect ratio, HCT116 cells were treated with different aspect ratio CTAB-GNRs (aspect ratios of 1, 2, 3 and 4) for 24, 48 and 72 hours. The data showed that the CTAB-GNRs had similar abilities to induce cell death regardless of aspect ratio (Fig. 7a). Moreover, Western blot analysis showed that the CTAB-GNRs of different aspect ratios could induce the cleavage of caspase-9 and PARP and increase the LC3-II levels, which indicated that the cells had undergone apoptosis and autophagy (Fig. 7b,c). Consistent with the cell viability and Western blot results, the CTAB-GNRs with different aspect ratios had similar abilities to decrease the mitochondrial membrane potential (Fig. 7d), although they exhibited different abilities to activate intracellular ROS (Fig. 7e). These results indicated that the aspect ratio of CTAB-GNRs has little effect on their cytotoxicity.
Surface chemistry is the key factor determining the cytotoxicity of gold nanorods
Surface modifications have been extensively used to improve the biocompatibility and stability of gold nanorods. The cellular uptake of GNRs synthesized by the seed-mediated method is dramatically influenced by their surface properties16,17. Thus, we investigated the influence of the GNR surface coatings on their toxicity. As shown in Fig. 8a, compared with the single CTAB coatings, the multi-coated GNRs exhibited reduced cytotoxicity. The GNRs coated with CTAB/PSS, CTAB/PAH, CTAB/PSS/PAH or CTAB/PAH/PSS induced almost no cell death. Similarly, the PARP, caspase-9 and LC3 levels indicated that the GNRs did not induce apoptosis or autophagy in the HCT116 cells (Fig. 8b,c). In addition, we also examined the effects of these multi-coated GNRs on the mitochondrial membrane potential and intracellular ROS levels (Fig. 8d,e). Consistent with the cell survival studies, the GNRs with multiple coatings (CTAB/PSS, CTAB/PAH, CTAB/PSS/PAH or CTAB/PAH/PSS) had almost no effect on the functioning of the mitochondria. These data suggest that multi-coated GNRs are less toxic than are CTAB-GNRs. Therefore, the surface modification of GNRs is the critical factor determining their cytotoxicity.
TEM images and intracellular localization of GNRs
Although we found that the CTAB-GNRs could trigger cell apoptosis and autophagy, it was still unclear whether these GNRs could enter the cells. We used three different coated GNRs at a 2 nM concentration to treat HCT116 cells for 24 hours and then observed the cell morphology and status of the GNRs. As shown in Fig. 9a, the three types of GNRs (CTAB, CTAB/PAH, CTAB/PSS/PAH) were able to fully enter into the cells and localize to the cytoplasm, lysosome and endosome. Treatment with the CTAB-GNRs caused mitochondrial swelling and the production of autophagosomes; however, no mitochondrial swelling or autophagosomes appeared following treatment with CTAB/PAH or CTAB/PSS/PAH coated GNRs, consistent with the above autophagy results (Figs 9b,c and 4). Moreover, we found that treatment with CTAB/PSS/PAH coated GNRs caused the cells to produce large amounts of myelin bodies. TEM observations showed that the CTAB/PAH coated GNRs caused minimal abnormal cell morphology, suggesting that this bilayer coating provides better biocompatibility and lower cytotoxicity.
Biotoxicity and biodistribution of CTAB/PAH-coated GNRs in vivo
Based on the above results, we concluded that the CTAB/PAH-coated GNRs had low toxicity and did not induce cell death or mitochondrial damage. Next, we examined the biotoxicity and biodistribution of the CTAB/PAH-coated GNRs in vivo. Twelve male 6-week-old BALB/c mice were used to study the toxicity of the GNRs by measuring the body weight, MDA level and ALT activity. The mice were injected intravenously with 200 μL of a 0.9% saline solution containing GNRs at a dose of 560 μg/kg weight every other day for two weeks. Liver tissues and blood samples from the mice were harvested after all mice were sacrificed. The results showed that the CTAB/PAH-coated GNRs did not cause weight loss in mice, did not stimulate the level of reactive oxygen species in liver tissues or blood samples and did not increase the serum ALT activity (Fig. 10a–d). These data suggested that the CTAB/PAH-coated GNRs had low toxicity in vivo. To examine whether the GNRs reached the tumor tissues through blood circulation, we used eight subcutaneous tumor-bearing mice randomly divided into two groups. We performed the intravenous delivery of 200 μl of a 0.9% saline solution containing CTAB/PAH-coated GNRs at a dose of 560 μg/kg weight. The mice were anesthetized with ether, weighed and killed at 4 h and 24 h. The heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney and tumor tissues were collected and the biodistribution of the CTAB/PAH-coated GNRs was measured by ICP-MS. As shown in Fig. 10e, at longer treatment times, the content of GNRs in the mice tissues increased. The data indicated that the GNRs were mainly distributed in the liver, spleen and lungs. Additionally, the tumor tissues contained some GNRs. These results reveal that the CTAB/PAH-coated GNRs are stable in vivo and have a long half-life (Fig. 10e).
Compared with spherical nanoparticles, gold nanorods, which strongly absorb near-infrared (NIR) light, are more sensitive to changes in the local environment and offer stronger scattering and absorption efficiency per unit volume8,9. Owing to their special physicochemical properties and biocompatibility, GNRs have been extensively investigated for their potential applications in the fields of biology and medicine40,41. Currently, GNRs have become a model system for the development of nanoprobes. The most conventional synthesis method for GNRs is the seed-mediated method using CTAB, which is a toxic cationic surfactant12,13. It is therefore necessary to examine the toxicity mechanism of GNRs and to develop safer GNRs. The particle size, shape, aspect ratio and surface charge and modification are considered to be the most important factors influencing the cytotoxicity of GNRs. Smaller sized particles with higher surface-area-to volume ratios are often considered more dangerous42.
The toxicity of a material mainly lies in its potential to induce cell death or cause a systemic pathological response in vivo. Apoptosis and autophagy are the two major ways for programmed cell death. Apoptosis has significant roles in maintaining organism homeostasis and metabolic balance and in organ development. Additionally, apoptosis is the most common mechanism for targeted chemotherapies43. Autophagy is a basic catabolic mechanism that involves the cell degradation of unnecessary or dysfunctional cellular components, including some proteins and organelles, during starvation or external or internal stimuli44. A considerable number of toxic substances can cause cellular stress, including ER stress and ROS, which may lead to the activation of autophagy. In the present study, we examined the toxicity of GNRs by detecting their potential to induce cell apoptosis and autophagy. The results indicated that surface modification is the key factor determining the cytotoxicity of GNRs, while the aspect ratio does not influence their ability to induce cell death. CTAB-GNRs with different aspect ratios (1, 2, 3, 4) had similar abilities to induce HCT116 cell death and destroy mitochondria (Fig. 7). In terms of the surface modification, compared with the GNRs coated with CTAB alone, the GNRs coated with CTAB/PSS, CTAB/PAH, CTAB/PSS/PAH or CTAB/PAH/PSS showed minimal toxicity and had almost no effect on cell viability or mitochondrial damage (Fig. 8). Our data also showed that the primary mechanism of toxicity of the CTAB-GNRs was through the activation of intracellular ROS and mitochondrial damage, which firmly affect cell survival. High-aspect-ratio GNRs are of particular interest for biomedical applications because of their increased scattering contrast10. The present study indicated that no obvious difference in toxicity was found among GNRs with different aspect ratios, which suggests that high-aspect-ratio GNRs may be superior in potential applications.
The toxicity of GNRs is also influenced by the surface modification because the surface coating can influence cellular uptake16,17,45,46. Some researchers have proposed that nanoparticle internalization occurs via receptor-mediated endocytosis arising from the cellular recognition of proteins in the media47,48,49,50,51. When cell tries to shield itself from toxicity induced by the rod, different plasma proteins will adsorb on nanoparticles surface. The nanoparticles subsequently enter the cells after adopting the physiochemical properties of the adsorbed protein shell, but it not always worked well. Not all kinds of nanoparticles covered with various surface modifications will enter the cells effectively and safely. Only conjugated with proper biochemical molecules can nanoparticles recognize the proteins on cell membrane. And protein adsorption to the nanoparticles surface can mediate the receptor-mediated endocytosis or the direct penetration of nanomaterial. The potential toxicity and health impact of nanomaterials are essential before these nanomaterials can be used in real clinical settings. Since cytotoxicity was influenced by the physicochemical properties of nanorods, it is very important to utilize surface modifications to control the biological effects of nanoparticles to satisfy safe applications in nanomedicine. GNRs were rapidly coated by proteins and then transported by vesicles into the lysosome52. Smaller GNRs are often considered more toxic because they are more likely to be taken up into intracellular locations, such as the nucleus and mitochondria, that cannot be reached by larger materials42. In this study, we investigated the internalization of GNRs by transmission electron microscopy and found that three different coated GNRs (CTAB, CTAB/PAH, CTAB/PSS/PAH) can be taken up by HCT116 cells after treatment for 24 hours (Fig. 9). The GNRs were mainly distributed in the cytoplasm, lysosomes and endosomes in the form of aggregates. Considering the cellar uptake of the GNRs and the cell morphology, the CTAB/PAH bilayer-coated GNRs were more biocompatible and showed minimal cytotoxicity. In addition to surface modification, some reports have shown that the cytotoxicity of GNRs is also closely related to the original physicochemical properties of the nanomaterials, for example, the charge and dimensions53,54. Although here we did not examine the effect of aspect ratio on GNR internalization, previous studies have shown that PDDAC-coated GNRs with an aspect ratio of 4 possesses negligible toxicity and high cellular uptake efficiency17.
In addition to performing in vitro cell investigations, the absorption, biodistribution, clearance and toxicity of the CTAB/PAH-coated GNRs in vivo was evaluated using subcutaneous tumor-bearing mice. GNRs administered via intravenous injection can reach multiple organs and tumor tissues in animals, even when the tumor is relatively small. The distribution in the tissues and organs after 24 hours was greater than that after 4 hours, indicating that the CTAB/PAH-coated GNRs were stable in vivo and had a long half-life (Fig. 10). Therefore, CTAB/PAH-coated GNRs are a promising biomedical nanomaterial for photothermal therapy, bioimaging, sensing, drug delivery and cancer treatment.
Materials and Methods
The present study was approved by Wuhan University. And, the methods were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines. In addition, all experimental protocol was approved by Wuhan University and written informed consent was obtained from every subject.
Chemicals and cell culture
Chloroauric acid (HAuCl4•4H2O, 99.99%), silver nitrate (AgNO3, 99.8%), L-ascorbic acid (99.7%), sodium chloride (NaCl, 96.0%) and hydrochloric acid (HCl, 36–38%) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Sodium borohydride (NaBH4, 96%), poly(allylamine hydrochloride) (PAH, MW ~15,000 g/mol) and poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate) (PSS, MW ~70,000 g/mol) were obtained from Aldrich (USA). Hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB, 99.0%) was purchased from Amresco Inc. (USA). All the chemicals were used as received without further purification. Ultrapure water with a resistivity of approximately 18.25 MΩ•cm was used as the solvent in all experiments.
DCFH-DA (2′, 7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate) was obtained from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) was purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Rhodamine 123 (Rh123), cyclosporin A (CsA), acridine orange, GAPDH antibody and HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (goat anti-rabbit and goat anti-mouse) were purchased from Beyotime (Nantong, China).The antibody against microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3) was purchased from Sigma and antibodies against caspase-9, PARP, total-Akt, phospho-Akt (Ser473), total MEK, phospho-MEK, total-ERK, phospho-ERK (Thr202/Tyr204), total-p38, phospho-p38 (Thr180/Tyr182), mTOR, phospho-p70s6k and phospho-rps6 were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA).
Human colon cancer cells (HCT116) were cultured in McCoy’s 5A medium. Human tumor cell lines (BEL7402, Huh7, PC3 and Hela) and immortalized nonmalignant cell lines (L02, HEK293T and HFF) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM). All the cells were cultured in culture media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Hyclone), penicillin (100 units/mL) and streptomycin (100 μg/mL) and incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. The cell culture dishes and plates were obtained from Wuxi NEST Biotechnology. Co., Ltd.
Synthesis and characterization of GNRs
The GNRs were synthesized in an aqueous solution using a seed-mediated growth method55. The gold seeds were prepared by mixing 5 mL of 0.5 mM HAuCl4 with 5 mL of 0.2 M CTAB, followed by the addition of 600 μL freshly prepared ice-cold 10 mM NaBH4 drop-wise under mild stirring. The seed solution was left for 2 h before use. For the synthesis of the GNRs, 18 mL of 5 mM HAuCl4 and 225 μL of 0.1 M AgNO3 were added to 90 mL of 0.2 M CTAB and then 200 μL of 1.2 M HCl and 10.5 mL of 10 mM ascorbic acid were added and gently swirled as the color changed from dark orange to colorless. Next, 120 μL of the CTAB-stabilized gold seed solution was rapidly injected. The resulting solution was gently mixed for 10 s and left undisturbed overnight. Finally, the GNR solution was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min to stop the reaction. The supernatant was removed and the precipitate was resuspended in ultrapure water. GNRs of various length-diameter ratios were synthesized by changing the volume of AgNO3. The GNR concentration was estimated to be approximately 0.65 nM according to the extinction coefficients at the LSPR wavelength56.
The multilayer polyelectrolyte-coated GNRs were synthesized via a layer-by-layer approach26,27,57. A 20 mL volume of 10 mg/mL polyelectrolyte (PAH or PSS) in 1 mM NaCl and 10 mL of 10 mM NaCl were added to 100 mL of 0.65 nM GNRs and stirred for 1 h at room temperature. A centrifugation cycle of 10,000 rpm for 10 min was performed to remove the excess polyelectrolyte and NaCl and the pellet was re-dispersed in 100 mL of ultrapure water. The second layer of polyelectrolyte was formed using the same method.
Absorption spectra were collected on a TU-1810 UV-Vis-NIR spectrophotometer (Purkinje General Instrument Co. Ltd. Beijing, China). The zeta potentials of the samples were determined using a Zetasizer (Nano ZS90, Malvern Instruments, UK) at 25 °C.
Cell viability and apoptosis assays
The cell viability was determined by a trypan blue dye exclusion assay according to established protocols and the cells were counted using a hemocytometer. Apoptosis analysis was evaluated with a sub-G1 assay. The cells were harvested and washed with PBS, followed by fixation with 70% alcohol overnight at 4 °C. The fixed cells were collected, washed with PBS and then stained with 4 μL of 10 mg/mL propidium iodide (PI) and 10 μL of 1 mg/mL RNase. The stained cells were assessed on a flow cytometer (Beckman). The data were processed with FlowJo.
Western blot analysis
Following the different treatments indicated in the figure legends, the cells were collected and washed with PBS and then lysed with 1% SDS on ice. Then, the cell lysates were heated at 95 °C for 20 minutes and centrifuged at 12,000 g for 10 minutes. The supernatant was collected and the protein concentration was determined with a bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Pierce). Samples were run on SDS-PAGE gels and immunoblotted with the antibodies mentioned above.
Measurement of intracellular ROS level and mitochondrial membrane potential
FACS analysis was carried out to study the intracellular ROS and mitochondrial membrane potential. Briefly, after treatment, the cells were collected, washed with PBS and resuspended in serum-free medium containing the corresponding dye. The intracellular ROS levels were measured by the addition of 10 μM 5-(and-6)-carboxy-2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (carboxy-H2DCFDA; Invitrogen) at 37 °C for 20 min. The mitochondrial membrane potential was determined by measuring the retention of the Rh123 dye. The cells were washed again and subjected to flow cytometry analysis. The results were analyzed by FlowJo software.
Fluorescence microscopy of LC3 and acridine orange staining
HCT116 cells were preliminarily cultured in 12-well plates overnight on glass slides. To inspect autophagic fluorescent puncta accumulation in LC3, the cells were transiently transfected with the pEGFP-LC3 plasmid using FuGENETM HD (Roche) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. After treatment, the cells were observed with a fluorescent microscope (Olympus BX51).
Autophagy is the process of sequestering cytoplasmic proteins into the lytic component and is characterized by the formation and promotion of acidic vesicular organelles (AVOs), as described previously. To detect the development of AVOs, the cells treated on glass slides were stained with acridine orange (1 μg/mL) for 15 min and then observed with a fluorescent microscope (Olympus BX51).
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
After different treatments as indicated, the cells were collected and washed with PBS. The cells were then soaked in 2.5% glutaraldehyde for fixation, washed three times in 0.1 M PBS and fixed with 1% OsO4. Next, the cells were dehydrated using a range of alcohol concentrations for 15 minutes. The cells were then embedded into paraffin and sliced using an LKB-V ultramicrotome (BROMMA, Sweden). For TEM inspection, the prepared sections were examined under an H-600 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi, Japan).
Animal experiments and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS)
Male 6-week-old BALB/c mice were obtained from the Disease Prevention Center of Hubei Province (Wuhan, Hubei, China). In total, 8 mice were used to study the biodistribution of GNRs at two time points, with four mice per time point. Mice were inoculated with the C6 cells. Approximately 2 × 106 cells/100 μL were subcutaneously injected into the right thighs of the mice. When the tumors attained a size of 8–10 mm in diameter, we performed intravenous delivery of 200 μl of 0.9% saline containing GNRs at a dose of 560 μg/kg weight. The mice were anesthetized with ether, weighed and killed at 4 h and 24 h. The heart, liver, spleen, lungs, kidneys and tumor tissues were collected and washed three times with deionized water to remove residual blood. After the extra water on the surface had been removed with filter paper, each tissue was weighed for quantitative analysis of the GNRs in tissues.
For quantitative measurement, all tissues were weighed, digested and measured by ICP-MS. Briefly, 3 mL HNO3 was added to a conical flask to predigest the samples overnight. The samples were mixed with 2 mL H2O2 and were digested and heated for approximately 3 h at 150 °C in open vessels on a hot plate. The remaining solution was cooled and diluted to 3 mL with a mixed acid solution containing 2% HNO3 and 1% HCl. In the process of quantitative analysis, a blank solution and a series of gold standard solutions (0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 50, 100 and 200 ppb) were prepared with the mixture solution and were measured to obtain the detection limit and a standard curve. Bismuth (10 ppb) in a mixed acid solution was used as an internal standard solution. Both the standard and the test solutions were measured three times by ICP-MS, whereas the blank solution was measured additional times.
Malondialdehyde (MDA) assay and serum ALT activity assay
Twelve male 6-week-old BALB/c mice were used to study the toxicity of the GNRs, including the MDA level and ALT activity. The mice were injected intravenously with 200 μL of a 0.9% saline solution containing GNRs at a dose of 560 μg/kg weight every other day for two weeks. The liver tissues and blood samples from the mice were harvested after all the mice were sacrificed.
The liver tissue samples were homogenized and sonicated in RIPA buffer on ice. Tissue lysates were then centrifuged at 12,000 g for 15 min at 4 °C to collect the supernatant. The liver tissues and blood tissues from the mice were subjected to an MDA assay as described in the lipid peroxidation MDA assay kit (Beyotime, Nantong, China). The MDA concentration of each sample was detected using a multimode microplate reader (SpectramMax M5) at 532 nm, using 490 nm as a control. The blood samples from the mice were also subjected to serum ALT activity analysis as described in the serum ALT assay kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China). The ALT levels were detected using a multimode microplate reader (SpectraMax M5) at 510 nm.
All experiments were performed at least three times. Student’s t-test was used for all the statistical analyses and the differences were considered significant if the p value was less than 0.05.
How to cite this article: Wan, J. et al. Surface chemistry but not aspect ratio mediates the biological toxicity of gold nanorods in vitro and in vivo. Sci. Rep. 5, 11398; doi: 10.1038/srep11398 (2015).
Murphy, C. J. et al. Chemical sensing and imaging with metallic nanorods. Chem Commun(Cambridge, England), 544–557 (2008).
Jain, P. K., Lee, K. S., El-Sayed, I. H. & El-Sayed, M. A. Calculated absorption and scattering properties of gold nanoparticles of different size, shape and composition: applications in biological imaging and biomedicine. J Phys Chem 110, 7238–7248 (2006).
Huang, X., El-Sayed, I. H., Qian, W. & El-Sayed, M. A. Cancer cell imaging and photothermal therapy in the near-infrared region by using gold nanorods. J Am Chem Soc 128, 2115–2120 (2006).
Wijaya, A., Schaffer, S. B., Pallares, I. G. & Hamad-Schifferli, K. Selective release of multiple DNA oligonucleotides from gold nanorods. ACS Nano 3, 80–86 (2009).
Hu, X. et al. Fabrication, characterization and application in SERS of self-assembled polyelectrolyte-gold nanorod multilayered films. J Phys Chem 109, 19385–19389 (2005).
Nath, N. & Chilkoti, A. A colorimetric gold nanoparticle sensor to interrogate biomolecular interactions in real time on a surface. Anal Chem 74, 504–509 (2002).
Qian, J., Jiang, L., Cai, F., Wang, D. & He, S. Fluorescence-surface enhanced Raman scattering co-functionalized gold nanorods as near-infrared probes for purely optical in vivo imaging. Biomaterials 32, 1601–1610 (2011).
Wang, H. et al. In vitro and in vivo two-photon luminescence imaging of single gold nanorods. P Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 15752–15756 (2005).
Lee, K. S. & El-Sayed, M. A. Gold and silver nanoparticles in sensing and imaging: sensitivity of plasmon response to size, shape and metal composition. J Phy Chem 110, 19220–19225 (2006).
Chernak, D. J., Sisco, P. N., Goldsmith, E. C., Baxter, S. C. & Murphy, C. J. High-aspect-ratio gold nanorods: their synthesis and application to image cell-induced strain fields in collagen films. Meth Mol Biol,Clifton, N.J 1026, 1–20 (2013).
Alkilany, A. M. & Murphy, C. J. Toxicity and cellular uptake of gold nanoparticles: what we have learned so far? J Nanopart Res 12, 2313–2333 (2010).
Connor, E. E., Mwamuka, J., Gole, A., Murphy, C. J. & Wyatt, M. D. Gold nanoparticles are taken up by human cells but do not cause acute cytotoxicity. Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) 1, 325–327 (2005).
Mirska, D. et al. Biophysical and biochemical properties of a binary lipid mixture for DNA transfection. Colloid Surface 40, 51–59 (2005).
Wang, S. et al. Challenge in Understanding Size and Shape Dependent Toxicity of Gold Nanomaterials in Human Skin Keratinocytes. Chem Phys Lett 463, 145–149 (2008).
Niidome, T. et al. PEG-modified gold nanorods with a stealth character for in vivo applications. J Control Release 114, 343–347 (2006).
Alkilany, A. M. et al. Cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of gold nanorods: molecular origin of cytotoxicity and surface effects. Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) 5, 701–708 (2009).
Qiu, Y. et al. Surface chemistry and aspect ratio mediated cellular uptake of Au nanorods. Biomaterials 31, 7606–7619 (2010).
Chithrani, B. D., Ghazani, A. A. & Chan, W. C. Determining the size and shape dependence of gold nanoparticle uptake into mammalian cells. Nano Lett 6, 662–668 (2006).
Grabinski, C. et al. Effect of gold nanorod surface chemistry on cellular response. ACS nano 5, 2870–2879 (2011).
Soenen, S. J. et al. Cytotoxic effects of gold nanoparticles: a multiparametric study. ACS nano 6, 5767–5783 (2012).
Liu, C., Gong, K., Mao, X. & Li, W. Tetrandrine induces apoptosis by activating reactive oxygen species and repressing Akt activity in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Cancer 129, 1519–1531 (2011).
Zhan, Y., Gong, K., Chen, C., Wang, H. & Li, W. P38 MAP kinase functions as a switch in MS-275-induced reactive oxygen species-dependent autophagy and apoptosis in human colon cancer cells. Free Radic Biol Med 53, 532–543 (2012).
Gong, K., Zhang, Z., Chen, Y., Shu, H. B. & Li, W. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase, receptor interacting protein and reactive oxygen species regulate shikonin-induced autophagy in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Pharmacol 738C, 142–152 (2014).
Gong, K. & Li, W. Shikonin, a Chinese plant-derived naphthoquinone, induces apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma cells through reactive oxygen species: A potential new treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Free Radic Biol Med 51, 2259–2271 (2011).
Cho, J. C. et al. Investigation of the Interactions between Ligand-Stabilized Gold Nanoparticles and Polyelectrolyte Multilayer Films. Chem Mater 17, 4547–4553 (2005).
Wang, J. H. et al. Bimodal optical diagnostics of oral cancer based on rose bengal conjugated gold nanorod platform. Biomaterials 34, 4274–4283 (2013).
Wang, B. K. et al. Rose-bengal-conjugated gold nanorods for in vivo photodynamic and photothermal oral cancer therapies. Biomaterials 35, 1954–1966 (2014).
Daniel, V., Leff, L. B. & James, R. H. Synthesis and Characterization of Hydrophobic, Organically-Soluble Gold Nanocrystals Functionalized with Primary Amines. Langmuir 12, 4723–4730 (1996).
Kumar, S., Tomar, M. S. & Acharya, A. HSF1-mediated regulation of tumor cell apoptosis: a novel target for cancer therapeutics. Future Oncol (London, England) 9, 1573–1586 (2013).
Ryter, S. W., Cloonan, S. M. & Choi, A. M. Autophagy: a critical regulator of cellular metabolism and homeostasis. Mol Cells 36, 7–16 (2013).
Klionsky, D. J. & Emr, S. D. Autophagy as a regulated pathway of cellular degradation. Science (New York, N.Y 290, 1717–1721 (2000).
Hung, J. Y. et al. 6-Shogaol, an active constituent of dietary ginger, induces autophagy by inhibiting the AKT/mTOR pathway in human non-small cell lung cancer A549 cells. J Agr Food Chem 57, 9809–9816 (2009).
Pene, F. et al. Role of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt and mTOR/P70S6-kinase pathways in the proliferation and apoptosis in multiple myeloma. Oncogene 21, 6587–6597 (2002).
Lemasters, J. J. et al. Role of mitochondrial inner membrane permeabilization in necrotic cell death, apoptosis and autophagy. Antioxid Redox Sign 4, 769–781 (2002).
van Loo, G. et al. The role of mitochondrial factors in apoptosis: a Russian roulette with more than one bullet. Cell Death Differ 9, 1031–1042 (2002).
Shin, S. et al. The omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid DHA induces simultaneous apoptosis and autophagy via mitochondrial ROS-mediated Akt-mTOR signaling in prostate cancer cells expressing mutant p53. BioMed Res Int 2013, 568671 (2013).
Maillet, A., Yadav, S., Loo, Y. L., Sachaphibulkij, K. & Pervaiz, S. A novel Osmium-based compound targets the mitochondria and triggers ROS-dependent apoptosis in colon carcinoma. Cell Death Dis 4, e653 (2013).
Wen, X. et al. Deconvoluting the role of reactive oxygen species and autophagy in human diseases. Free Radical Bio Med 65, 402–410 (2013).
Chithrani, B. D. & Chan, W. C. Elucidating the mechanism of cellular uptake and removal of protein-coated gold nanoparticles of different sizes and shapes. Nano Lett 7, 1542–1550 (2007).
Xu, L. et al. Surface-engineered gold nanorods: promising DNA vaccine adjuvant for HIV-1 treatment. Nano Lett 12, 2003–2012 (2012).
Yu, C., Varghese, L. & Irudayaraj, J. Surface modification of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide-capped gold nanorods to make molecular probes. Langmuir 23, 9114–9119 (2007).
Jahnen-Dechent, W. & Simon, U. Function follows form: shape complementarity and nanoparticle toxicity. Nanomedicine (London, England) 3, 601–603 (2008).
Reed, J. C. Apoptosis-targeted therapies for cancer. Cancer cell 3, 17–22 (2003).
Orrenius, S., Kaminskyy, V. O. & Zhivotovsky, B. Autophagy in toxicology: cause or consequence ? Annu Rev Pharmacol 53, 275–297 (2012).
Chen, X.-M. J. L.-M. W. J. W. C.-Y. Gold Nanomaterials: Preparation, Chemical Modification, Biomedical Applications and Potential Risk Assessment. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 166, 1533–1551 (2012).
Alkilany, A. M. & Murphy, C. J. Toxicity and cellular uptake of gold nanoparticles: what we have learned so far? J Nanopart Res 12, 2313–2333 (2010).
Chithrani, B. D., Stewart, J., Allen, C. & Jaffray, D. A. Intracellular uptake, transport and processing of nanostructures in cancer cells. Nanomedicine 5, 118–127 (2009).
Hillaireau, H. & Couvreur, P. Nanocarriers’ entry into the cell: relevance to drug delivery. Cell Mol Life Sci 66, 2873–2896 (2009).
Lynch, I. et al. The nanoparticle–protein complex as a biological entity; a complex fluids and surface science challenge for the 21st century. Adv Colloid Interface 134-135, 167–174 (2007).
Cedervall, T. et al. Detailed Identification of Plasma Proteins Adsorbed on Copolymer Nanoparticles. Angew Chem Int Edit 46, 5754–5756 (2007).
Lynch, I. & Dawson, K. A. Protein-nanoparticle interactions. Nano Today 3, 40–47 (2008).
Chithrani, D. B. Intracellular uptake, transport and processing of gold nanostructures. Mol Membr Biol 27, 299–311 (2010).
Goodman, C. M., McCusker, C. D., Yilmaz, T. & Rotello, V. M. Toxicity of gold nanoparticles functionalized with cationic and anionic side chains. Bioconjugate Chem 15, 897–900 (2004).
Pan, Y. et al. Size-dependent cytotoxicity of gold nanoparticles. Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) 3, 1941–1949 (2007).
Sau, T. K. & Murphy, C. J. Seeded high yield synthesis of short Au nanorods in aqueous solution. Langmuir 20, 6414–6420 (2004).
Orendorff, C. J. & Murphy, C. J. Quantitation of metal content in the silver-assisted growth of gold nanorods. J Phy Chem 110, 3990–3994 (2006).
Hauck, T. S., Ghazani, A. A. & Chan, W. C. Assessing the effect of surface chemistry on gold nanorod uptake, toxicity and gene expression in mammalian cells. Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) 4, 153–159 (2008).
This study was supported by National Basic Research Program of China (2013CB933904, 2014CB910603), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81273540, 81472684), Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of Ministry of Education of China (NCET-13-0436), Distinguished Youth Foundation of Hubei Province of China (2012FFA019), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2042014kf0236) and the Major Scientific and Technological Special Project for the “Significant Creation of New Drugs” (2011ZX09102-001-32).
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Wan, J., Wang, JH., Liu, T. et al. Surface chemistry but not aspect ratio mediates the biological toxicity of gold nanorods in vitro and in vivo. Sci Rep 5, 11398 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11398
Exposure to airborne gold nanoparticles: a review of current toxicological data on the respiratory tract
Journal of Nanoparticle Research (2020)
Recent Advances in Iron Oxide Nanoparticles (IONPs): Synthesis and Surface Modification for Biomedical Applications
Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism (2019)
Influence of gold nanoparticle surface chemistry and diameter upon Alzheimer’s disease amyloid-β protein aggregation
Journal of Biological Engineering (2017)
Comparisons of the biodistribution and toxicological examinations after repeated intravenous administration of silver and gold nanoparticles in mice
Scientific Reports (2017)
Molecular Imaging and Biology (2016)