Article | Open Access | Published:

Physical assembly of Ag nanocrystals on enclosed surfaces in monocrystalline Si

Scientific Reports volume 4, Article number: 6744 (2014) | Download Citation

Abstract

Growth of thin crystals on external substrate surfaces by many different methods is a well-known technique, but its extension to inner, enclosed surfaces of large defects in monocrystalline materials has not yet been reported. The literature on thin film growth and defects in materials can be leveraged to fabricate new structures for a variety of applications. Here we show a physical process of nucleation and evolution of nanocrystalline silver inside voids in monocrystalline silicon. We found that the Ag growth is hetero-epitaxial using a coincident site lattice. Alignment of Ag and Si atomic planes is uniformly observed by high resolution transmission electron microscopy and macroscopically by channeling Rutherford backscattering spectrometry.

Introduction

Thin films with large lattice mismatch are generally accompanied by several stress-relieving defects due to the large growth area. Growth of such materials inside open-volume defects in crystalline materials has the advantage of perfectly clean, uncontaminated surfaces as well as limited growth volume reducing stress-induced defects, resulting in a physical method to fabricate nanocrystals. The materials Ag and Si, immiscible below the eutectic point 830°C1, are chosen because Ag atoms do not form a compound but chemisorb on inner surface of voids2,3. The diffusion of Ag atoms through the Si lattice is slow and is mediated by point defects4,5,6, causing localized strains in the Si lattice which are relieved upon Ag chemisorption inside a void. The lattice mismatch between Ag and Si is approximately 25%, yet hetero-epitaxial growth of Ag on Si(111) using a 4:3 coincident site lattice with a small amount of residual strain has been reported7,8. Epitaxially oriented Ag islands have been grown on H-terminated Si surface with a co-incident site lattice relationship that are strained ε = −0.3%8. Previous studies on the efficiency of defects to trap metals in transistors investigated the removal of metal from sensitive regions of micro-electronic devices, with limited focus on promoting metal growth inside defects9,10,11.

Metal nanoparticles can be fabricated in SiO2 by direct implantation of silver ions12, however, implantation into silicon causes amorphization13 and epitaxial regrowth of silicon is impossible due to high metal concentration14. In this study, a low density of large voids is obtained by helium ion irradiation and high temperature defect annealing, which favors growth of voids over dislocations15,16. Overcoming the difficulties mentioned would result in a novel composite material of metal nanoparticles fully integrated within a monocrystalline semiconductor substrate suitable for devices or detectors. We seek a structure which (a) forms pure metal nanoparticles instead of metal silicide for maximized electron density, (b) has minimized defects, i.e. dislocations, to avoid leakage currents, and (c) has well-ordered metal-silicon interfaces to minimize carrier recombination.

One potential application of Ag nanocrystals in silicon is for decreasing the thickness of photovoltaic cells due to near- and far-field effects of plasmonic interactions with light17. Randomly dispersed nanoparticles18 and patterned arrays19,20,21 deposited on the surface of solar cells as well as plasmonic back contacts22 have shown moderate to strong effects on induced photocurrent. For nanoparticles with diameters 10–50 nm interacting with c-Si, ordinarily forbidden direct transitions across the band-gap are facilitated by momentum of plasmon resonances23,24. The resonance frequency of spherical metallic particles in air is in a wavelength region where c-Si photocells readily absorb sunlight, but this resonance can be red-shifted by changing the size, shape and dielectric environment23. A shape with a high aspect ratio combined with high refractive index of silicon may red-shift the plasmon resonace near the Si bandgap23. The realization of a structure to support surface plasmon polaritons within monocrystalline silicon would significantly expand existing optoelectronic technology.

Figures 1a–d illustrate the major fabrication steps used in our study. First, nanovoids are introduced by low fluence helium ion irradiation which minimizes additional crystalline disorder. Second, annealing is used to relax the voids, so that the initially spherical voids grow and transition into the equilibrium shape for Si crystals, with (111) having lowest surface energy25. Third, an immiscible metal is vapor-deposited avoiding adhesion layers containing silicide-forming metals. And finally, metal atoms diffuse from the Si surface by the kick-out or dissociative mechanisms into Si, where open volume defects act as termination sites for metal diffusion. We use a lower temperature for Ag drive-in diffusion to avoid the eutectic temperature of the Ag-Si system (830°C) but high enough for sufficient diffusivity and epitaxial growth1,4,5,6. Fig. 1e plots the vacancy profile and helium ion distribution, predicted from Monte Carlo simulation code SRIM using full damage cascade model26. Due to the low solid solubility of helium in Si, the implanted helium diffuses back to the vacancy peak region to induce and stabilize bubble formation before diffusing out of the Si wafer, leading to void relaxation16. The transmission electron micrograph (TEM) in Fig. 1f shows the structures resulting from 5 × 1015 cm−2 100 keV He ion irradiation followed by defect annealing for 60 minutes, evaporation of 100 nm Ag layer and diffusion heat treatment for one hour at 750°C. The low He ion irradiation fluence is less than or equal to the minimum fluence previously reported to induce voids in silicon27. Silver nanoparticles with diameters of up to ~35 nm are found in a band up to 100 nm thick. Some of the voids are fully decorated, and the remaining free volume in each void is highly variable.

Figure 1: Silver nanoparticles in silicon.
Figure 1

Fabricating nanoparticles by (a) ion implantation and (b) defect annealing to create open volume defects, followed by (c) metal deposition and (d) heat treatment to diffuse metal to the open volume defects. (e) Vacancy and He ion concentration profiles calculated by binary collision approximation code SRIM (25). (f) Bright field TEM of Ag nanoparticles in Si.

Different nanoparticle morphologies formed under different annealing and diffusion conditions are compared in Figures 2a–d. Fig. 2a and 2b correspond to the same defect annealing conditions (950°C for 10 minutes) but the Ag diffusion conditions are different (a is annealed at 750°C for one hour and b is annealed at 750°C for two hours). Fig. 2c and 2d differ in defect annealing time (950°C for 30 and 60 minutes, respectively) but share the same diffusion heat treatment (750°C for one hour). The same specimen in Fig. 2d is shown in Fig. 1f. The areal density of Ag trapped in the void region shown in Fig. 2e is measured by Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS), and is converted to the equivalent thickness of a continuous film with density of bulk Ag, 10.47 g/cm3. Based on the assumption of the bulk density of Ag which will be justified later, it is clear that a significant amount of metal is transported and trapped in a highly localized volume of the Si wafer. It is expected that increasing the defect annealing time should increase void size, decrease void density, and decrease point defect concentrations, thereby reducing the radiation-enhanced diffusivity of Ag from the Si surface. Furthermore, it is expected that increasing the diffusion heat treatment time should promote Ag growth inside voids. However, metastable void decoration is observed in 2a and 2b, which contain voids of roughly equivalent size. Silver atoms are trapped, or chemisorbed, in voids after a short time but re-emitted into silicon upon increasing heat treatment. RBS analysis shown in 2e supports this observation, and it is well known that void gettering of Au in Si is metastable3. The dramatically increased Ag trapping as the defect annealing time increases from 30 to 60 minutes, shown in 2c, d, and e, is unexpected due to the requirement of Ag to diffuse with the aid of Si point defects. Lower point defect concentrations caused by increased defect annealing lowers Ag diffusivity, which should lead to decreased Ag trapping inside voids. The opposite trend is measured macroscopically by RBS and observed microscopically by TEM. Voids are larger and dislocations (indicated by strain contrast) are fewer after longer defect annealing. Larger voids, fewer other defects (dislocations), and relatively suppressed diffusivity (though still enhanced over pristine Si) contribute to higher Ag trapping in voids in Fig. 2c and 2d.

Figure 2: Microscopic and macroscopic quantification of Ag trapped in voids.
Figure 2

Annealing at 950°C for 10 min (a & b), 30 min (c), and 60 min (d) forms voids. Heat treatment at 750°C for one hour (a, c, & d) and two hours (b) diffuse Ag from surface to voids. Scale bars in insets of (a–d) are equivalent and represent 20 nm. (e) Amount of Ag trapped in nanoparticle region is measured by Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS), with points labeled ad corresponding to TEM. The right abscissa shows equivalent thickness of a continuous Ag film.

Figure 3a and b shows high resolution TEM and Fourier filtering of one nanoparticle viewed along the [110] zone axis in slightly different focusing conditions. This specimen has also been shown in Figs. 1f and 2d. The electron beam is in a double diffraction alignment condition, where electrons are diffracted by multiple atomic planes. In the double diffraction condition, Moire interference is caused by interaction of the electron beam with layers of parallel Ag and Si atomic planes which have different spacings. The fringe spacings of the dashed lines in Fig. 3a and 3b are 5.5 Å and 9.4 Å, respectively. The interference fringe spacing for parallel Si(111) and Ag(111) planes is calculated by where dA(xyz) is the spacing of plane (xyz) of element A28. For Si(110) and Ag(110) planes with spacings of 1.919 Å and 1.444 Å, respectively, Eq. 1 gives interference fringe spacing of 5.6 Å. The close agreement between measured and calculated values and the shared orientation of interference fringes through nanoparticles with Si lattice planes outside nanoparticles supports the inference that atomic planes of Ag in the nanocrystals are parallel to Si substrate lattice planes.

Figure 3: Fourier filtered high resolution TEMs of one Ag nanoparticle taken from specimen shown in Fig. 2d showing Moiré interference of Ag and Si (a) (110) atomic planes with fringe spacing 5.5 Å and (b) (111) atomic planes with fringe spacing 9.4 Å.
Figure 3

Dashed lines indicate fringes.

Detailed TEM investigation of two nanocrystals imaged along the [110] zone axis is shown in Fig. 4 from the specimen shown in Fig. 2c and point labelled “c” in Fig. 2e. Two nanocrystals shown in Fig. 4a are approximately the same size, but the voids they are decorating clearly have different sizes. The kinetics of nanocrystal growth depend on the diffusion conditions (time, temperature, point defect concentrations) rather than the initial void size. The nanocrystal decorating the smaller void on left in Fig. 4a is analyzed by high-resolution TEM in Fig. 4b, and lattice directions determined from the corresponding diffraction pattern (not shown) are indicated. Moiré interference with a fringe spacing of 9.9 Å, indicated by grey dashed lines, is readily visible without the aid of a Fourier filtering method. The nanocrystal in Fig. 4b is bounded primarily by (111) atomic planes and a smaller area of (100) atomic planes. This corresponds well with the surface energy anisotropy reported for pure Si, where the lowest energy surface is (111) and the next lowest is (100)25. The shape is a rounded octahedron. No stress fields, which would indicate large structural distortion, at the Si/Ag interface are observed. However, the cross-sectional TEM sample thickness is much greater than the nanoparticle size, and so small distortions may be averaged out by the large amount of Si above and below the nanocrystal.

Figure 4: High resolution TEM of Ag nanocrystals with free volume taken from specimen shown in Fig. 2c.
Figure 4

(a) Two nanocrystals of equivalent size grown in voids of different size and (b) left nanocrystal in (a) imaged along [110] zone axis showing Moiré interference of Ag/Si (111) atomic planes with fringe spacing 9.9 Å visible without Fourier filtering of micrograph.

Changes to the Si lattice caused by diffusion and trapping of Ag is quantified by channeling ion beam analysis of the <100> (surface-normal) axis. Channeling and random spectra obtained with 2 MeV helium analysis beam around the Si <100> axial channel direction are shown in Figure 5a, obtained from a sample with 950°C defect annealing for 30 minutes and 750°C diffusion heat treatment for one hour (characterized by TEM in Figs. 2c and 4). The spectrum for channel numbers < 290 corresponds to backscattering from Si, while that for channel numbers > 290 corresponds to backscattering from Ag (yields are enlarged by a factor of 20 to aid visualization). The channeling “Si + Ag NP” surface peak (channel ~ 265) shows that the Si surface has not reconstructed or formed a compound layer when compared with the pure Si channeling surface peak. The sharp peaks close to channel 330 in the random spectrum (345 in the channeling spectrum due to He ion stopping power difference) correspond to Ag nanocrystals. RBS spectra with channel number less than 280 correspond to backscattering from Si. At the channel number 200 and below, the RBS channeling spectrum (blue curve) has a bump-like yield enhancement, instead of a peak. This means that the defects in the Ag nanocrystal/void region are strong dechanneling centers like dislocations, instead of direct backscattering centers like defect clusters. On the other hand, TEM in Fig. 2c shows that the Ag NP region is relatively defect free. Figure 5b compares channeling RBS spectra of Ag in Si samples obtained under different thermal treatments to an unaltered Si wafer. The region between the Si surface and the voids/nanocrystals is shown in channels > 200, and the void/nanocrystal region starts around channel 200 extending deeper into the wafer. The slightly increased backscattering yield between channels 200–260 of 60 minutes vs. 30 minutes (of defect annealing at 950°C, diffusion heat treatment for one hour at 750°C) indicates that the Si point defect concentration does not monotonically decrease with increasing defect annealing. Based on this observation, the increased Ag trapping observed in Fig. 2c and 2d is caused by greater Ag diffusion mediated by greater point defect concentrations. At channel number 200 and lower, yields increase with decreasing channel numbers. Except for the condition involving the annealing at 750°C/90 min, yields after the “bump” region (channel 180 to 200) do not decrease, suggesting the existence of strong dechanneling centers in each sample. For the annealing at 750°C for 90 min, the yield is reduced after the Ag nanocrystal region and becomes close to that of unaltered Si. A small amount of Ag remaining in this sample is in the form of small defect clusters instead of nanocrystals. Empty voids, from which all or most Ag has been re-emitted into the Si lattice, also cannot confine the He beam and would scatter the ion beam similar to point defects. As the beam exits the void and re-enters the Si substrate, the void/substrate interface causes direct scattering (similar to the phenomenon causing the surface peak typically observed in channeling curves). This argument is supported by TEM in Fig. 2. Although dislocations are observed under TEM, their densities are too low to contribute to such strong dechanneling in the rest of the samples analyzed in Fig. 5b. We argue that the dechanneling is caused by the Si stress and slight atomic plane bending near the Ag nanocrystals, due to mismatch in the number of atomic planes of Ag and Si at the interface creating a small amount of residual strain8. We believe that the dechanneling is caused by Si structural distortion near the Ag nanocrystals. Interaction with Ag atomic planes that dechannel the analysis beam resulting in backscattering from nearby Si can also happen, however the geometric cross section of Ag nanocrystals is too small to account for the observed dechanneling cross section. Epitaxial growth through 4:3 co-incident site lattice (CSL) leads to localized stress fields extending into the surrounding Si, which bend the He ion beam and causes dechanneling in a way similar to dislocations. Furthermore, the absence of defect peaks (direct scattering rather than dechanneling) suggests that there is no Si disorder similar to point defects or small defect clusters at the Si-Ag interface. We can extract the depth profile of dechanneling centers by adopting the equation widely used for dislocations where χd(t) is the normalized channeling yield from channel t in each sample and χv(t) is the normalized channeling yield in channel t from pure, unadulterated Si29. λ is the dechanneling cross section which depends on the size of the region effected by the stress fields from the Si-Ag interfaces and nd is the concentration of dechanneling centers. The measured defects are an overestimate of the true number of carrier recombination centers.

Figure 5
Figure 5

Ion channeling analysis obtained from <100> axis of Ag in Si, (a) RBS channeling of surface normal <100> axial channel with backscattering yield from Ag atoms highlighted. Comparison with <100> axial channeling of pure Si is included. (b) Normalized backscattering yield of Ag in Si samples fabricated with defect annealing times of 10, 30, 60, and 90 minutes and diffusion heat treatment times of one or two hours. (c) Dechanneling cross section of Si extracted from (a).

Angular scans across the surface-normal <100> and off-normal <110> axial channels are shown in Figs. 6a and 6b, respectively. In Fig. 6b, the ion beam is aligned with the (100) plane channel as it goes through the <110> axial channel, causing normalized yield in the “shoulders” to be less than unity. The yields from Si near the surface (without Ag) are plotted for comparison. The yields are integrated from Ag nanoparticle regions, and normalized to their corresponding random values. All yield curves show a dip at zero tilt with respect to the axial channel position, which means that the Ag atomic rows are aligned with those of Si in both <100> and <110> directions, suggesting epitaxial growth of Ag. Under CSL configuration, a fraction of the aligned Ag atomic rows are not aligned with the Si atomic rows and are viewed as dislocations by the channeled beam. This increases the Ag yield and causes higher Ag minimum yields when compared with Si, so the physical meaning of the observed minimum yield of Ag nanocrystals is not known.

Figure 6: Ion channeling of Ag in Si fabricated with 950°C defect annealing for 30 minutes and 750°C diffusion heat treatment for one hour.
Figure 6

Angular scans across the <100> (surface normal) axis (a) and the <110> (off-normal) axis aligned with (100) plane (b).

For device applications, the Schottky barrier height of the Ag-Si interface is around 0.6 eV, which suggests a threshold photon wavelength of ~1.8 μm for photoemission from Ag particles (28), and the presence of an ideal interface could decrease that value30,31. Therefore, in addition to use as a computing component driven by 1.3 μm or even 1.55 μm semiconductor lasers, devices can be used for radiation detection that require high spatial resolution since the substrate is compatible with existing Si technology. It is possible to extend applications further into the infrared region, for imaging applications, through strain engineering to narrow the band gap of the semiconductor medium, reducing the Schottky barrier height. For example, the band gap of a Si0.7Ge0.3 layer grown in a relaxed Si0.3Ge0.7 structure can be reduced to 0.8 eV, and thus the Schottky barrier height can be reduced to 0.2 eV for a Ag-Si interface32. Consequently, the threshold wavelength for device switching would be increased to 6.2 μm.

The present study does not involve annealing at temperatures greater than the eutectic point of Si and Ag, therefore mixing is not expected. Previous reports have suggested metastable silver silicide phases created under specialized conditions such as rapid quenching due to melt spinning or high pressure causing phase transformation from cubic to tetragonal Si unit cell in small volume effected by nanoindentation33,34. However, our experimental conditions do not involve rapid cooling and voids are not pressurized shown by transition to faceted from spherical shape. Very limited solid solubility of Si and Ag in each other leads to high likelihood of heterogeneous epitaxial growth. The occurrence of Moire interference fringes parallel to Si atomic planes with spacings near calculated values provides strong evidence of pure Ag nanocrystals. The nanocrystals are too small (and surrounding Si too thick) to make easy identification of phases from electron diffraction patterns of low-index zone axes possible in this case. Supplementary Figures S3 and S4 contains TEM and electron diffraction patterns from a much larger Ag nanocrystal that was fabricated apart from this study which clearly demonstrates pure Si and Ag phases.

The synthesized structure realizes, in a new way, the plasmonic structure to improve photovoltaic devices proposed by Atwater and Polman17. Fully integrating nanometallic plasmonics with dielectric photonics is now possible35. Development of plasmonic theory for non-spherical metallic nanoparticles must be carried out before applications will be well understood. This physical method of growing nanocrystals of an immiscible material on the inner surface of open volume defects in a crystalline solid has potential to further tune the properties of technologically important materials in ways that have not been possible previously.

Methods

Fabrication of Ag nanoparticles in voids in monocrystalline silicon

The method to fabricate nanoparticles by chemisorption onto an inner surface consists of three steps: create open volume defects in Si, deposit Ag on the Si surface, and diffuse Ag into the open volume defects. Voids are created by two steps, first implanting 5 × 1015 100 keV He ions/cm2 at room temperature into float-zone, B-doped Si(100) wafer of resistivity 5–10 Ω-cm. Defect annealing to nucleate and grow voids is performed at 950°C in flowing ultra-high purity Ar for 10, 30, 60 or 90 minutes utilizing a hot-zone method. The sample rests in a quartz boat and is inserted into and withdrawn from the hot zone of furnace as rapidly as possible. After defect annealing and before physical vapor deposition (PVD), sample surfaces are cleaned by sequential acetone and ethanol baths followed by evaporation with dry nitrogen gas, performed twice, then etching with HF acid vapor for 10 s. Evaporation of 100 nm Ag onto the Si surface is performed in a BOC Edwards Auto 306 Metal Evaporation Chamber. No adhesion layer (e.g. Cr) is deposited. Heat treatment to diffuse Ag into the Si wafer is performed at 750°C in ultra-high purity Ar utilizing a hot-zone method. Prior to characterization, residual Ag is removed by wetting the surface with solvent (e.g. acetone) and wiping with Kimwipes or cotton swabs.

Microscopic characterization

Cross-sectional samples for transmission electron microscopy are created by the lift-out technique using dual-beam SEM/FIB. TEM specimens are characterized in a Philips CM200 transmission electron microscope operated at 200 kV. The spacings of Ag atomic planes measured from diffraction patterns obtained from the particles are normalized to Si atomic planes from the matrix. A portion of the original micrograph is Fourier transformed, masked to show Moiré interference fringe and inverted. Fourier filtering is carried out by averaging the portion of the original micrograph with the inverted Fourier transformed image.

Ion beam analysis

Ion beam analysis is performed with a 2 MeV He ion analyzing beam probing the <100> and <110> axial channels, and the beam is aligned with the (100) plane channel as it scans across the <110> axial channel. A surface barrier detector collects He ions backscattered 165° from the incident direction.

References

  1. 1.

    & Ag-Si (Silver-Silicon). Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, II Ed. (ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio, 1990).

  2. 2.

    , & Mechanisms of transition-metal gettering in silicon. J. Appl. Phys. 88, 3795 (2000).

  3. 3.

    & Transport and reaction of Au in Si containing cavities. Phys. Rev. B 57, 7015 (1998).

  4. 4.

    , & Solubility, diffusion and thermodynamic properties of silver in silicon. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 20, 1148 (1987).

  5. 5.

    , , & Study of silver diffusion into Si(111) and SiO2 at moderate temperatures. J. Appl. Phys. 70, 1392 (1991).

  6. 6.

    , , & Silver diffusion and defect formation in Si(111) substrate at elevated temperature. Mater. Chem. Phys. 76, 224 (2002).

  7. 7.

    , , & Microstructure of epitaxial Ag/Si(111) and Ag/Si(100) interfaces. Phil. B 57, 179 (1988).

  8. 8.

    & The development of epitaxy of nanoclusters on lattice-mismatched substrates: Ag on H-Si(111) surfaces. Surf. Sci. 520, 7 (2002).

  9. 9.

    , & Diffusion and trapping of Au to cavities induced by H-implantation in Si. Nucl. Inst. Meth. B 106, 424 (1995).

  10. 10.

    , , , , , & Depth profiling of vacancy clusters in MeV-implanted Si using Au labeling. Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 2980 (1998).

  11. 11.

    , , & Microstructural differences between platinum and silver trapped in hydrogen induced cavities in silicon. Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 2713 (1998).

  12. 12.

    et al. Selective nucleation induced by defect nanostructures: a way to control cobalt disilicide precipitation during ion implantation. J. Appl. Phys. 112, 123504 (2012).

  13. 13.

    , , , & Nanocrystals in crystalline silicon: Void formation and hollow particles. J. Mater. Res. 16, 2670 (2001).

  14. 14.

    Ion Implantation: Basics to Device Fabrication (Kluwer, Boston, 1995).

  15. 15.

    et al. Overpressurized bubbles versus voids formed in helium implanted and annealed silicon. Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 732 (1997).

  16. 16.

    et al. Helium-implanted silicon: A study of bubble precursors. J. Appl. Phys. 85, 1401 (1999).

  17. 17.

    & Plasmonics for improved photovoltaic devices. Nature Materials 9, 205 (2010).

  18. 18.

    , & Enhanced semiconductor optical absorption via surface plasmon excitation in metal nanoparticles. Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 063106 (2005).

  19. 19.

    , , & Electromagnetic coupling of light into a solar cell by nanodisk plasmons. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 053110 (2008).

  20. 20.

    et al. Design of plasmonic thin-film solar cells with broadband absorption enhancements. Adv. Mat. 21, 3504 (2009).

  21. 21.

    & Large integrated absorption enhancement in plasmonic solar cells combining metal gratings and antireflection coatings. Nano Lett. 11, 2195 (2010).

  22. 22.

    et al. Light trapping in ultrathin plasmonic solar cells. Opt. Expr. 18, A237 (2010).

  23. 23.

    , & Direct generation of charge carriers in c-Si solar cells due to embedded nanoparticles. J. Appl. Phys. 102, 093713 (2007).

  24. 24.

    , & Plasmon enhanced photovoltaic effect in metallically nanomodified photocells. Sol. Energy Mat. Sol. Cells 117, 663 (2013).

  25. 25.

    , , , & Equilibrium shape of Si. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1643 (1993).

  26. 26.

    , & SRIM-The stopping and range of ions in matter (2010). Nucl. Inst. Meth. B 268, 1818 (2010).

  27. 27.

    , & Gettering of metals by He induced voids in silicon. Nucl. Inst. Meth. Phys. B 96, 249 (1995).

  28. 28.

    , , , & Electron Microscopy of Thin Crystals (Plenum Press, New York, 1967).

  29. 29.

    , & Materials Analysis by Ion Channeling: Submicron Crystallography (Academic Press, New York, 1982).

  30. 30.

    Schottky-Barrier Formation at Single-Crystal Metal-Semiconductor Interfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 641 (1984).

  31. 31.

    et al. Inhomogeneous Schottky barrier at Ag/Si(111) and Ag/Si(100) interfaces. J. Appl. Phys. 79, 7820 (1996).

  32. 32.

    , & Band structure calculations of Si-Ge-Sn alloys; achieving direct band gap materials. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 22, 742 (2007).

  33. 33.

    , & The Ag-Si (Silver-Silicon) system. Bull. Alloy Phase Diag. 10, 635 (1989).

  34. 34.

    , , & Microstructual evolution of nanoindented Ag/Si thin-film under different annealing conditions. Mat. Trans. 52, 1868 (2011).

  35. 35.

    & The case for plasmonics. Science 328, 440 (2010).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is funded by Welch Foundation project A-1671. M.S.M. and L.S. would like to acknowledge Dr. Wei-Kan Chu and Xuemei Wang of the Texas Center for Superconductivity at the University of Houston for RBS measurements.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Nuclear Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843

    • Michael S. Martin
    •  & Lin Shao
  2. CHD-Fab, Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., Chandler, AZ 85224

    • N. David Theodore
    •  & Lin Shao
  3. Materials Science and Engineering Program, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843

    • Chao-Chen Wei
    •  & Lin Shao

Authors

  1. Search for Michael S. Martin in:

  2. Search for N. David Theodore in:

  3. Search for Chao-Chen Wei in:

  4. Search for Lin Shao in:

Contributions

L.S. designed experiments. L.S. and M.S.M. prepared the manuscript. M.S.M. carried out the irradiation experiments. N.D.T. fabricated TEM samples. N.D.T. and C.-C.W. characterized TEM samples. M.S.M., N.D.T. and C.-C.W. performed TEM data analysis.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lin Shao.

Supplementary information

Word documents

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06744

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.