Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Fracture-induced amorphization of polycrystalline SiO2 stishovite: a potential platform for toughening in ceramics

Abstract

Silicon dioxide has eight stable crystalline phases at conditions of the Earth's rocky parts. Many metastable phases including amorphous phases have been known, which indicates the presence of large kinetic barriers. As a consequence, some crystalline silica phases transform to amorphous phases by bypassing the liquid via two different pathways. Here we show a new pathway, a fracture-induced amorphization of stishovite that is a high-pressure polymorph. The amorphization accompanies a huge volume expansion of ~100% and occurs in a thin layer whose thickness from the fracture surface is several tens of nanometers. Amorphous silica materials that look like strings or worms were observed on the fracture surfaces. The amount of amorphous silica near the fracture surfaces is positively correlated with indentation fracture toughness. This result indicates that the fracture-induced amorphization causes toughening of stishovite polycrystals. The fracture-induced solid-state amorphization may provide a potential platform for toughening in ceramics.

Introduction

Silicon dioxide (silica) has many polymorphs. The stable phase at ambient conditions is α-quartz and this phase transforms into three different phases with temperature before it melts. A number of pressure-induced transformations are known. α-quartz transforms to coesite at ~2 GPa. In all the crystalline phases stable at pressures below coesite (including coesite), silicon atoms are tetrahedrally coordinated by oxygen atoms. Silica glass, which is a metastable phase, also has a silicon coordination number (CN) of four. Stishovite1 is stable at pressures above ~9 GPa (ref. 2) with a CN = 6. Stishovite undergoes further transformations to three different stable phases (CN = 6) with pressure3,4,5 up to 300 GPa.

The complexity of phase relations in silica arises from the presence of many metastable phases6. The appearance of the metastable phases depends strongly on the initial structure and pressurization-annealing procotol6. α-quartz has been reported to transform to several intermediate metastable crystalline phases7,8,9 via room-temperature compression before it amorphizes10. Cristobalite, which is a high-temperature phase, was reported to transform to a stable phase via a metastable crystalline phase (hp-cristobalite11) by means of room-temperature compression12,13. It was also reported that amorphous silica crystalizes via a metastable crystalline phase14 under pressure. The presence of many metastable crystalline phases implies that large kinetic barriers exist between the stable phases6.

Solid-state amorphization, in which a crystal is transformed to an amorphous phase by bypassing the liquid, is also a consequence of large kinetic barriers. In silica, two pathways are known. The first is pressurization10: α-quartz and coesite are amorphized by compression at 25–35 GPa and room temperature. The second is heating of high-pressure phases at 1 bar: coesite and stishovite transform to an amorphous phase at ~1100 and ~550°C, respectively15, prior to stable phases (quartz and cristobalite).

In the present study, we show evidences of a new pathway, a fracture-induced solid-state amorphization of polycrystalline stishovite, by careful observations of fracture surfaces of samples with different grain sizes using electron microscopy and X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) spectroscopy. An unexpected consequence arises from the fracture-induced amorphization of stishovite: it may trigger toughening of this ceramic.

Results

Synthesis of stishovite polycrystals

A series of stishovite polycrystals (SPs) were synthesized at every 100°C between 1200 and 2000°C and at a fixed pressure of 15 GPa. We used a rod-shaped bulk silica glass with no visible void as a starting material. The chemical composition is pure: all the impurities are less than 0.1 ppm except OH (~800 ppm). X-ray diffraction measurements of the recovered samples were performed using synchrotron radiation. Crystallite size was refined by full profile analysis by the Rietveld method. The obtained crystallite sizes were consistent with the mean grain sizes measured by electron and optical microscopy. The crystallite size (CS) increases monotonically with temperature from ~100 nm at a synthesis temperature (TS) of 1200°C to ~30 μm at TS = 2000°C.

Transgranular and intergranular fractures

We observed fracture surfaces with a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM). A fracture surface of a SP (TS = 1300°C, CS ~ 250 nm) shows a rough and distinctive morphology (Fig. 1a). The presence of many worm-like16 textures was observed and the whole fracture surface is completely filled with this texture (supplementary information). The dimensions of a “worm” are several tens and hundreds of nanometers in diameter and length, respectively (orange arrows). The presence of long “worms” (>1 μm long) can also be seen (green arrows). We observed similar features on a fracture surface of a SP with TS = 1600°C and CS ~ 1.5 μm (Fig. 1b). All the SPs with TS below 1600°C show similar fracture surfaces.

Figure 1
figure1

Microstructures of fracture surfaces.

(a), (b), Secondary electron images (SEIs) of a fracture surface of a sample synthesized at 1300 (a) and 1600°C (b). Orange arrows, small “worms”; green arrow, long “worms” with length > 1 μm. (c), (d), TEM micrographs of cracks produced by Vickers indentations for samples synthesized at 1200 (c) and 1600°C (d). c, Two electron diffraction patterns of grains on the left-hand side (ED-L) and on the right-hand side (ED-R) of the crack are shown. These two grains have the very similar crystallographic orientations, indicating that transgranular fracture occurs in this sample with crystallite size of ~250 nm. Other two grains (red arrows) divided by the crack seem also to be a single grain before the cracking. (d), Transgranular fractures are observed. The inset shows a magnified view of the crack indicated by the white arrow. The bosses indicated by yellow arrows can be worm-like textures (b). (e), A SEI of a fracture surface of a sample synthesized at 2000°C. Intergranular fracture is dominant.

In order to observe crack propagation in these SPs, we made thin sections whose surfaces are perpendicular to cracks produced by Vickers indentations and the thin sections were observed by a transmission electron microscope (TEM). We observed grains showing transgranular fractures in SPs synthesized at 1200°C (Fig. 1c) and 1600°C (Fig. 1d). Grains showing transgranular and intergranular fractures may be present on the fracture surfaces of these SPs, but it is difficult to evaluate the ratio of grains showing these two fractures by observing the fracture surfaces (Fig. 1a, b). Since we observed extensive transgranular fractures in these SPs, the formation of worm-like textures might be related to the transgranular fractures. These results show that worm-like textures exist and transgranular fracture occurs in SPs with TS below 1600°C.

On the other hand, a fracture surface of a SP with TS = 2000°C resembles that of alumina ceramics17 (Fig. 1e). This image clearly shows that intergranular fracture is dominant. Our results show that the ratio of stishovite grains showing transgranular and intergranular fractures changes with TS: transgranular fractures occur extensively at TS below 1600°C; intergranular fracture is dominant at TS = 2000°C.

XANES measurements: CN change induced by transgranular fracture

In order to examine phenomena that happened on fracture surfaces of SPs, we performed Si-K XANES measurements (Fig. 2a). For each measurement, we collected two spectra simultaneously: a spectrum collected by the total electron yield (TEY) method and that by the partial fluorescence yield (PFY) method. The former is a surface-sensitive method: a XANES spectrum to a depth of ~10 nm from the surface18 can be obtained. The latter is a bulk-sensitive method: a spectrum to a depth of ~1 μm can be obtained for silica materials. Since the peak position of XANES spectra of stishovite with CN = 6 is quite different from those of silica materials with CN = 4, these spectra can be used as fingerprints19,20 to distinguish silica materials with different CNs.

Figure 2
figure2

Results of XANES measurements.

(a), Representative XANES spectra and those obtained by first-principles calculations. TEY and PFY spectra collected simultaneously from one measurement are shown side by side. (i), α-quartz by first-principles calculation; (ii), ordinary silica glass; (iii) densified silica glass; (iv), stishovite by first-principles calculation; (v), unpolished surface of a polycrystalline stishovite sample with synthesis temperature (TS) of 1300°C; (vi), polished surface TS = 1300°C; (vii), fracture surface TS = 1300°C; (viii), fracture surface TS = 1600°C; (ix), fracture surface TS = 1800°C; (x) fracture surface TS = 2000°C. *, a pre-edge peak of stishovite. All the spectra are normalized by using the peak-top intensity. The blue and red dashed-lines represent peak positions of densified silica glass (CN = 4, iii) and of stishovite (CN = 6, v), respectively. (b), Relative intensities of TEY (the solid line) and PFY (the dot-line) spectra of an unpolished surface of a polycrystalline stishovite (TS = 1300°C, spectra v). *, a pre-edge peak of stishovite. (c), A relation between ratio of the CN = 4 materials on the fracture surfaces of polycrystalline stishovite (RCN4) and synthesis temperature. The dashed orange arrow is a visual guide. “Transgranular”, transgranular fractures are extensively observed; “Intergranular”, intergranular fracture is dominant.

First, we performed a measurement for an unpolished (as sintered) surface of a SP (TS = 1300°C, CS ~ 250 nm). The TEY and PFY spectra (v) can be explained by the presence of a single phase of stishovite. Relative intensities of the TEY and PEY spectra (v) are shown in Fig. 2b. The peak intensities of the PFY spectrum are lower than those of the TEY spectrum because of the self-absorption effect. A pre-edge peak that may be attributed to the effect of the atomic vibrations at room temperature21 is observed in both spectra (Fig. 2b).

On the other hand, two peaks indicating the presence of materials with CN = 4 and 6 were clearly observed in a TEY spectrum obtained from a polished surface (by diamond pastes down to a grain size of 0.25 μm) of the SP (vi). Note that the CN = 4 peak cannot be observed in the PFY spectrum. These results demonstrate that the CN = 4 materials coexist with stishovite (CN = 6) in a thin layer whose thickness is several tens of nanometers from the polished surface. A previous study reported that stishovite was inverted to silica glass (CN = 4) by mechanical grinding22, which supports our observations. Similar features were observed in the spectra obtained from fracture surfaces of SPs (TS = 1300 and 1600°C) in which transgranular fractures occur and worm-like textures exist (vii, viii), demonstrating the coexistence of the CN = 4 material with stishovite (CN = 6) in thin layers (several tens of nanometer thick) adjacent to the fracture surfaces.

The presence of the CN = 4 phase near the fracture surfaces can only be detected by using surface-sensitive methods. In a previous study16, the presence of the thin CN = 4 layer was undetectable using conventional Raman spectroscopy (supplementary information) because penetration depth of visible light into SPs is much deeper (they look translucent) than the thickness of the CN = 4 layer (several tens of nanometers). In the present study, the TEY-XANES method enabled us to detect this thin layer.

We observed a decrease of relative intensity of the CN = 4 peak with respect to the CN = 6 peak intensity in TEY spectra with increasing synthesis temperature (TS) above 1700°C (ix). At the highest TS of 2000°C, we observed the complete absence of the CN = 4 peak (x). As shown in Fig. 1e, intergranular fracture is dominant in this SP.

We estimated ratios of the CN = 4 materials (RCN4) in the thin layers adjacent to the fracture surfaces by comparing the TEY spectra with synthetic ones by first-principles calculations and obtained a plot showing RCN4 vs. TS (Fig. 2c). RCN4 is almost constant in a temperature range where transgranular fractures and worm-like textures are observed (TS below 1600°C), whereas RCN4 decreases with temperature at TS > 1700°C and it reaches zero (absence of the CN = 4 phase) at TS = 2000°C where intergranular fracture is dominant.

Fracture-induced solid-state amorphization

In order to identify the CN = 4 phase, we performed TEM observations. A TEM sample was carefully prepared from a SP (TS = 1600°C, CS ~ 1.5 μm) solely by mechanical crushing. A low magnification image in which a crushed surface is perpendicular to the image shows the presence of worm-like textures (Fig. 3a). Selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns of the worm-like textures have a halo and an example of X-ray fluorescence spectra show the presence of only silicon and oxygen (Fig. 3b). These results indicate that fracture of this SP induces transformation from stishovite (CN = 6) to amorphous silica (CN = 4), which results in the coexistence of the CN = 4 and CN = 6 peaks in the TEY-XANES spectrum (viii in Fig. 2a). These observations were carefully conducted using a very gentle electron beam (irradiation current: 50–100 pA) to avoid any potential beam damage23. The SAED patterns were taken with long exposure time (20 s). Elemental analysis was also performed using a defocused gentle beam (~50 pA). There are two possible materials as the fracture-induced amorphous silica: ordinary silica glass (o-glass) and densified silica glass24 (d-glass). A previous study25 reported that stishovite transforms to an amorphous phase that exhibits features of the d-glass by heating at 1 bar. Although our TEY-XANES spectra obtained from fracture surfaces of SPs can be explained better by using the spectrum of a d-glass (Fig. 2a), further studies will be needed to show that conclusively.

Figure 3
figure3

Microstructures of amorphous silica produced by fracture of a stishovite polycrystal synthesized at 1600°C.

(a), A low-magnification TEM micrograph of a fragment of a mechanically crushed sample. The fracture surface is perpendicular to the image. Worm-like textures are observed. (b), A magnified TEM image of worm-like textures. Electron diffraction patterns (ED1 and 2) and an X-ray fluorescence spectrum by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) show presence of an amorphous silica phase on the fracture surface. Carbon (C) and copper (Cu) peaks are from a TEM grid. An electron diffraction pattern (ED3) that is collected at the interface between the amorphous phase and stishovite shows coexistence of halo and diffracted spots. (c), A SEI of a fracture surface. Presence of large fractured grains (diameter > 5 μm; e.g. the grain at the center of this image) was observed. These grains allow us to observe an intergranular fracture surface of a single stishovite grain. (d), A magnified SEI of the area indicated by the dashed square in c. Amorphous silica materials are localized on fractured stishovite grains.

In order to locate the amorphous silica materials on a fracture surface of this sample (TS = 1600°C, CS ~ 1.5 μm), we performed FESEM observations. Many string-shaped materials were observed (Fig. 3d) on fractured stishovite grains (Fig. 3c). These strings are often curved and bended (Fig. 3d), suggesting that these are amorphous silica deformed by a huge volume expansion (~95% from stishovite to o-glass; ~60% from stishovite to d-glass) and by heat produced by exothermic transition from stishovite to an amorphous phase26. The curved strings that are expected to be amorphous silica are localized on fractured stishovite grains (Fig. 3d). These strings could be one of the sources of the worm-like texture (Figs. 1a, 1b and 3a). Note that the worm-like texture cannot be the only form of amorphous silica produced by fracture. Since the worm-like textures are scattered on the fracture surfaces (Figs. 1a and 1b) and the amount of this texture does not seem to be enough to explain RCN4 of ~ 0.45 (Fig. 2c), the amorphized silica materials may exist in stishovite grains and/or grain boundaries near the fracture surfaces. The results by TEM and FESEM observations (Figs. 3b and 3d) are consistent with those by the TEY-XANES spectra. Our experimental results show that fracture of SPs induces solid-state amorphization of stishovite (amorphization was not detected in the SP with TS = 2000°C) and that the formed amorphous silica (CN = 4) coexists with stishovite (CN = 6) in thin layers whose thickness is several tens of nanometers from the fracture surfaces.

Metastability of stishovite

Richet27 interpreted solid-state amorphization from a thermodynamical point of view: an amorphous phase is energetically more stable than a crystalline phase at temperatures between the glass transformation temperature (Tg) (the upper bound) and the temperature (Tf) at which the Gibbs free energy difference between crystal and glass (ΔG) is zero (the lower bound). Richet27 pointed out that the amorphous state is energetically more favorable than stishovite at ambient conditions because ΔG < 0 (stishovite is unstable with respect to o-glass) at 1 bar and 0 K. We calculated a pressure where ΔG = 0 between stishovite and o-glass at room temperature using previously determined thermodynamics parameters28,29. (We were unable to calculate ΔG = 0 between stishovite and d-glass because of the lack of enthalpy measurement of d-glass.) The calculated pressure was 3 GPa and pressure-temperature conditions where solid-state amorphization of stishovite is energetically favorable are shown in Fig. 4. At ambient conditions, stishovite is over-decompressed, but amorphization of stishovite is hindered by the large kinetic barrier. When stress to induce fracture is applied to stishovite, it can be amorphized by overcoming this kinetic barrier.

Figure 4
figure4

Schematic illustration to show metastability of stishovite.

Bold lines represent equilibrium phase boundaries2. The dot-line represents room-temperature. The dot-dash line represents glass transition temperature (Tg); Tg0: Tg at 1 bar. Dashed lines represent hypothetical metastable extensions of melting curves of coesite and stishovite. The metastable melting curve of coesite is a smooth interpolation between a triple point (quartz, coesite, liquid) and P-T conditions at 1 bar and 875 K where ΔG between coesite and o-glass is zero27. The metastable melting curve of stishovite is a smooth interpolation between a triple point (coesite, stishovite, liquid) and P-T conditions at 3 GPa and room temperature (ΔG between stishovite and o-glass is zero). P-T conditions where solid-state amorphizations of coesite and stishovite are energetically favorable are shown as the blue area. P-T conditions where solid-state amorphization of stishovite is energetically favorable are shown as the pink area. The red star represents atmospheric pressure and room-temperature conditions. Qz, quartz; Coe, coesite; St, stishovite; Liq, liquid; Coe-A, coesite-amorphous transformation; St-A, stishovite-amorphous transformation.

There have been many studies concerning the mechanisms of solid-state amorphization (e.g. ref. 30). However, our experimental results are not enough to demonstrate which mechanism controls the fracture-induced amorphization. Further experimental and theoretical studies are required to elucidate the mechanism of this amorphization process.

Toughening by fracture-induced amorphization

The solid-state amorphization of stishovite is a fracture-induced transformation with volume expansion. The volume expansion from stishovite to amorphous silica is 60–95%. The best known material to exhibit fracture-induced transformation with volume expansion is partially-stabilized zirconia (PSZ). Fracture of PSZ induces a tetragonal-to-monoclinic (t-m) transformation31 with volume expansion of about 4%. Since the t-m transformation in PSZ induces toughening, we hypothesize that fracture-induced amorphization of stishovite causes toughening of SPs.

In order to verify this hypothesis, fracture toughness of SPs should be measured. Fracture toughness of ceramics can accurately be measured32,33 by a chevron-notched beam (CNB), a single-edge pre-cracked beam (SEPB), or a surface crack in flexure (SCF) method. For these tests, large specimens (e.g., 3 × 4 × 45 mm) are usually required. However, our synthesized samples (~2 mm in diameter and ~1.2 mm in thickness) are much smaller than the required sample size for accurate measurements. Thus, there is no alternative but to evaluate fracture toughness by the Vickers indentation fracture (IF) method16.

Figure 5 shows results of Vickers indentation tests. Stishovite is the hardest known oxide that can be utilized at the ambient conditions34,35. Hardness values of a SP with TS = 1300°C are consistent with the previous results by experiments16,34 and a theoretical calculation36 (Fig. 5a). Figure 5b shows IF-fracture toughness (KIc) as a function of synthesis temperature. The present data below TS of 1400°C are consistent with those of a previous study16 within experimental errors. The IF-KIc value of a SP with TS = 1600°C is higher than that of the previous study. The IF-KIc values at TS up to 1800°C are two to three times higher than those of alumina polycrystals37,38. IF-KIc of SPs rapidly decreases with TS above 1900°C. We obtained IF-KIc of 3.7 ± 0.3 MPa m1/2 for a SP with TS = 1900°C at an indentation load of 98 N, whereas a SP with TS = 2000°C was broken into several pieces by an indentation at this load. These results indicate that the SP with TS = 2000°C is more brittle than that with TS = 1900°C. We therefore assumed that the IF-KIc of the SP with TS = 2000°C is equal to that of single crystal39 (~1.6 MPa m1/2). These results suggest that stishovite is inherently brittle39, but SPs with TS below 1600°C are highly toughened (>10 MPa m1/2). Of course, these are not accurate values, but micrographs of indentation traces of SPs synthesized at 1300°C (Fig. 5c) and 1900°C (Fig. 5d) also indicate that the former is tougher than the latter. It should also be noted that SPs with TS below 1600°C can be simultaneously hard and tough (Vickers hardness: ~30 GPa; IF-KIc: ~10 MPa m1/2). A new technique to measure KIc of these small samples accurately is highly required32 to show the simultaneous high-hardness and toughness conclusively.

Figure 5
figure5

Hardness and toughness of stishovite polycrystals determined by indentation tests.

(a), Hardness as a function of indentation load for a SP synthesized at 1300°C. HV, Vickers hardness; HK, Knoop hardness. At each load, the value was obtained by averaging three independent results. Léger and others34 determined HK = 33 GPa by averaging the data obtained at indentation loads of 0.49, 0.98 and 1.96 N (the black solid bar). The dashed line, a result by theoretical calculation36. (b), Vickers indentation fracture toughness (IF-KIc) as a function of synthesis temperature (TS). *, we assumed that IF-KIc of a sample with TS = 2000°C is 1.6 MPa m1/2 that is equal to that of the single crystal38. Fracture toughness of polycrystalline alumina is also shown as the green area for comparison. The dashed orange arrow is a visual guide. (c), An optical micrograph of a Vickers indentation trace of a SP synthesized at 1300°C (crystallite size, ~250 nm): Vickers hardness (HV), ~29.5 GPa; IF-KIc (49-196 N), 9.4 ± 0.6 MPa m1/2. (d), An optical micrograph of a Vickers indentation trace of a SP synthesized at 1900°C (crystallite size, ~20 μm): HV, ~21.2 GPa; IF-KIc (98 N), 3.7 ± 0.3 MPa m1/2. The insets show the whole views of the samples with diameter of ~2 mm and height of ~1.2 mm (c, d). The indentation traces were obtained at an applied load of 98 N (10 kgf) and the scale bars represent 100 μm (c, d).

In order to show the relationship between fracture-induced amorphization of stishovite and toughening of SPs, we ploted IF-KIc against the ratio of solid-state amorphized silica on fracture surfaces of SPs (RCN4) estimated by TEY-XANES measurements in Figure 6. IF-KIc increases with RCN4, which supports our hypothesis: fracture-induced amorphization of stishovite causes toughening of SPs.

Figure 6
figure6

Experimental data to indicate that fracture-induced amorphization of polycrystalline stishovite triggers toughening.

We plotted Vickers indentation fracture toughness (IF-KIc) against the ratio of solid-state amorphized silica in a thin-layer (several tens of nanometers thick) adjacent to fracture surfaces of SPs estimated by TEY-XANES measurements (RCN4). *, we assumed that IF-KIc of a sample with TS = 2000°C is 1.6 MPa m1/2 that is equal to that of the single crystal39. The dashed pink arrow is a visual guide.

A probable mechanism for the main contribution to the increase of IF-KIc of SPs is transformation toughening40. It was proposed41 that the increase of KIcKIc) by the transformation toughening is expressed using the following equation: ΔKIc = 0.2143 EVfeTh1/2/(1-ν), where E, Vf, eT, h and ν are Young's modulus, volume fraction of the transformed material, volume expansion associated with the transformation, thickness of the transformed area and Poisson's ratio, respectively. We calculated h using this equation with previously reported elastic moduli16, Vf = 0.45 (Fig. 6) and eT = 0.6 (stishovite to d-glass) – 0.95 (stishovite to o-glass) to explain ΔKIc (~8.4 MPa m1/2), i.e. the increase from the IF-KIc of the single crystal (~1.6 MPa m1/2) to those of SPs with TS below 1600°C (~10 MPa m1/2). The calculated h is 20–50 nm. This is consistent with our results obtained by XANES measurements (Fig. 2a). The thickness of the transformation zone of SPs could be at least one order of magnitude thinner than that of PSZ (h ~ 600 nm for an MgO-containing PSZ40). The transformation zone of PSZ can often be observed visually as an uplift surrounding an indentation trace42, whereas that of SPs is difficult to detect16 because it is only a nanolayer. Measurements of KIc as a function of crack extension are essential to understanding the mechanisms that contribute to the toughening of SPs. It is therefore highly required to develop a new technique to examine crack growth resistance behavior of these small samples, which will also allow us to measure KIc accurately.

Discussion

Fracture-induced solid-state amorphization may provide a new platform to produce toughened ceramics. As discussed by Richet27, there are some other high-pressure minerals that exhibit crystal vitrification at low pressures (i.e. ~1 bar). Jadeite is an example. It is noteworthy that natural jadeite polycrystals, which are called as jade, have been well-known to be tough rocks (KIc ~ 7 MPa m1/2) with extensive transgranular cleavage43, which is similar to our SPs. Fracture-induced amorphization might be observed on the transgranular fracture surfaces of jade. Richet27 also discussed that high-pressure silicates with CN = 6 are prime candidates for low-pressure vitrification. The present results indicate that these materials can potentially be toughened by fracture-induced amorphization. A survey of tough ceramics from silicates or abundant minerals on the Earth meets the requirement for managing the scarcity of chemical elements44.

Methods

Sample synthesis under high-pressure and temperature

Polycrystalline stishovite samples were synthesized using a Kawai-type high-pressure apparatus (LPR 1000-400/50, Max Voggenreiter GmbH) installed in Photon Science, DESY. An octahedral pressure medium (Cr-doped magnesia) with edge length of 14 mm was compressed by tungsten carbide anvils with truncated edge length of 7 mm. A cylindrical LaCrO3 furnace and disk-shaped ZrO2 thermal insulators were employed. Generated pressure was calibrated as a function of applied load using pressure-fixed points (ZnTe, 9.6 and 12.0 GPa; ZnS, 15.6 GPa). Temperature was calibrated as a function of input power in a separate run using a W0.95R0.05-W0.74Re0.26 thermocouple. The dimensions of the starting material are 2.5 mm in diameter and 1.4 mm in height. A sample container made of pure magnesia and platinum foils was employed. The assembled sample container in which a starting material was enclosed was dried for more than two hours in an oil-free vacuum oven (~8 hPa, ~150°C). After drying, the sample container was embedded into the furnace and the high-pressure cell was assembled. Load was applied first up to the target value under room temperature and electric power was increased at the constant load. Temperature was increased rapidly from ~450°C to the target value within 30 s. We kept the target temperature constant for 30 min. Temperature was decreased to ~450°C and decompression (3h) was started. The decompression under high-temperature was beneficial to sample recovering without cracking. Some polycrystalline stishovite samples were synthesized using a Kawai-type apparatus (Orange-3000) installed in Geodynamics Research Center, Ehime University. A densified silica glass was synthesized using a Belt-type apparatus installed in National Institute of Materials Science. The synthesis conditions are 7.7 GPa and 1200°C. The starting material was the same as that used for the synthesis of polycrystalline stishovite with different dimensions: an ordinary silica glass disk with 5.5 mm in diameter and 2.0 mm in height was used.

X-ray diffraction measurements using synchrotron

The measurements were performed at P02.1 (High-resolution Powder X-ray Diffraction Beamline), PETRAIII, Germany. X-rays monochromatized by a (111) diamond and a (111) silicon crystal in Laue geometry with an energy of ~60 keV were used. The incident beam-size was ~300 × 300 μm2. The transmission geometry was employed for the measurements. A two-dimensional detector (XRD 1621, PerkinElmer) was employed. The sample-to-detector distance (~750 mm) and the detector orthogonality were calibrated using a diffraction pattern of cerium dioxide powder.

SEM and TEM observations

A field emission scanning electron microscope (JSM-7000F, JEOL) operating at 15 kV was used for SEI observations. Osmium coating was performed for all the samples. TEM observations were performed using JEM-2010 (JEOL) operating at 200 kV. Thin foils of the samples for the TEM observations (Fig. 1c, d) were prepared by focused ion beam technique using JEM-9310FIB (JEOL) operating at 30 kV with Ga ion beam. We used opposed tungsten carbide anvils to crush a fragment of a SP to prepare a TEM sample for Figs. 3a and b.

XANES measurements and first-principles calculations

All the measurements were performed at BL27SU, SPring-8, Japan. Photon beam from a figure-8 undulator was dispersed by a soft X-ray monochromator with varied-line-spacing plane gratings. The beam diameter was ~500 μm at the sample positions. The intensity of the incoming beam was monitored by measuring the drain current on the surface of a post-focusing mirror. Photon energy was scanned by controlling the undulator gap and positions of the monochromator and slits simultaneously. Data were collected at every 0.1 eV with exposure time of 2 s between 1830 and 1885 eV. Theoretical Si-K XANES spectra were calculated using the first-principles method with a core-hole effect included. Details of conditions were shown in supplementary information.

Mechanical properties measurements

Hardness and fracture toughness measurements were performed using a Vickers indenter (HV-114, Mitsutoyo) and a microhardness indenter (HM-221, Mitsutoyo). A hard steel standard with 900 HV was used. The top and bottom surfaces of the samples were mirror-polished by using diamond pastes down to 0.25 μm. IF-KIc was calculated from the measured crack length, c, using an equation proposed by Anstis et al.45. The values of Vickers hardness determined for each samples in the present study and Young's modulus determined in a previous study16 were employed for the calculations.

References

  1. Stishov, S. M. & Popova, S. V. New dense polymorphic modification of silica. Geochemistry 10, 923–926 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang, J., Li, B., Utsumi, W. & Liebermann, R. C. In situ X-ray observations of the coesite-stishovite transition: reversed phase boundary and kinetics. Phys. Chem. Minerals 23, 1–10 (1996).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tsuchida, Y. & Yagi, T. A new post-stishovite high-pressure polymorph of silica. Nature 340, 217–220 (1989).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dubrovinsky, L. S. et al. Experimental and theoretical identification of a new high-pressure phase of silica. Nature 388, 362–365 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuwayama, Y., Hirose, K., Sata, N. & Ohishi, Y. The pyrite-type high-pressure form of silica. Science 309, 923–925 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Martoňák, R., Donadio, D., Oganov, A. R. & Parrinello, M. Crystal structure transformations in SiO2 from classical and ab initio metadynamics. Nature Mater. 5, 623–626 (2006).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kingma, K., Hemley, R. J., Mao, H.-K. & Veblen, D. R. New high-pressure transformation in α-quartz. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3927–3930 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Haines, J., Léger, J. M., Corelli, F. & Hanfland, M. Crystalline post-quartz phase in silica at high pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 155503 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wentzcovitch, R. M., de Silva, C., Chelikowsky, J. R. & Binggeli, N. A new phase and pressure induced amorphization in silica. Phys., Rev. Lett. 80, 2149–2152 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hemley, R. J., Jephcoat, A. P., Mao, H. K., Ming, L. C. & Manghnani, M. H. Pressure-induced amorphization of crystalline silica. Nature 334, 52–54 (1988).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang, L., Duranderdu, M. & Kieffer, J. Transformation pathways of silica under high pressure. Nature Mater. 5, 977–981 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tsuchida, Y. & Yagi, T. New pressure-induced transformations of silica at room temperature. Nature 347, 267–269 (1990).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dubrovinsky, L. S. et al. Pressure-induced transformations of cristobalite. Chem. Phys. Lett. 333, 264–270 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Prakapenka, V. P., Shen, G., Dubrovinsky, L. S., Rivers, M. L. & Sutton, S. R. High pressure induced phase transformation of SiO2 and GeO2: difference and similarity. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 65, 1537–1545 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dachille, F., Zeto, R. J. & Roy, R. Coesite and stishovite: stepwise reversal transformations. Science 140, 991–993 (1963).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nishiyama, N. et al. Synthesis of nanocrystalline bulk SiO2 stishovite with very high toughness. Scripta Mater. 67, 955–958 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Grasso, S., Hu, C., Maizza, G., Kim, B. N. & Sakka, Y. Effect of pressure application method on transparency of spark plasma sintered alumina. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 94, 1405–1409 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lindau, I. & Spicer, W. E. The probing depth in photoemission and Auger-electron spectroscopy. J Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 3, 409–413 (1974).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Li, D. et al. High-resolution Si K- and L2,3-edge XANES of α-quartz and stishovite. Solid State Commun. 87, 613–617 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Davoli, I. et al. Structure of densified vitreous silica: silicon and oxygen XANES spectra and multiple scattering calculations. Phys. Chem. Minerals 19, 171–175 (1992).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Brouder, C., Cabaret, D., Juhin, A. & Sainctavit, P. Effect of atomic vibrations on the x-ray absorption spectra at the K edge of Al in α-Al2O3 and of Ti in TiO2 rutile. Phys. Rev. B 81, 115125 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Skinner, B. J. & Fahey, J. J. Observations on the inversion of stishovite to silica glass. J. Geophys. Res. 68, 5595–5604 (1963).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. van Aken, P. A., Sharp, T. G. & Seifert, F. Electron-beam induced amorphization of stishovite: silicon-coordination change observed using Si K-edge extended electron energy-loss fine structure. Phys. Chem. Minerals 25, 83–93 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bridgman, P. W. & Šimon, I. Effect of Very high pressures on glass. J. Appl. Phys. 24, 405–413 (1953).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Grimsditch, M., Popova, S., Brazhkin, V. V. & Voloshin, R. N. Temperature-induced amorphization of SiO2 stishovite. Phys. Rev. B 50, 12984–12986 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Brazhkin, V. V., Voloshin, R. N. & Popova, S. V. The kinetics of the transition of the metastable phases of SiO2, stishovite and coesite to the amorphous state. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 136, 241–248 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Richet, P. Superheating, melting and vitrification through decompression of high-pressure minerals. Nature 331, 56–58 (1988).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Akaogi, M. & Navrotsky, A. The quartz-coesite-stishovite transformations: new calorimetric measurements and calculation of phase diagrams. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 36, 124–134 (1984).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Akaogi, M., Yusa, H., Shiraishi, K. & Suzuki, T. Thermodynamic properties of a-quartz, coesite and stishovite and equilibrium phase relations at high pressures and high temperatures. J. Geophy. Res. 100, 22337–22347 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wolf, D., Okamoto, P. R., Yip, S., Lutsko, J. F. & Kkuge, M. Thermodynamic parallels between solid-state amorphization and melting. J. Mater. Res. 5, 286–301 (1990).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Garvie, R. C., Hannink, R. H. & Pascoe, R. T. Ceramic steel? Nature 258, 703–704 (1975).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Quinn, G. D. & Bradt, R. C. On the Vickers indentation fracture toughness test. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 90, 673–680 (2007).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kruzic, J. J., Kim, D. K., Koester, K. J. & Ritchie, R. O. Indentation techniques for evaluating the fracture toughness of biomaterials and hard tissues. J. Mechan. Behav. Bio. Materials 52, 384–395 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Léger, J. M. et al. Discovery of hardest known oxide. Nature 383, 401 (1996).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Dubrovinsky, L. S. et al. The hardest known oxide. Nature 410, 653–654 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Oganov, A. R. & Lyakhov, A. O. Towards the theory of hardness of materials. J. Superhard Mater. 32, 143–147 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Yao, W. et al. Grain size dependence of fracture toughness for fine grained alumina. Scripta Mater. 65, 143–146 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Nishiyama, N. et al. Transparent nanocrystalline bulk alumina obtained at 7.7 GPa and 800°C. Scripta Mater. 69, 362–365 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Brazhkin, V. V. et al. Elastic moduli and the mechanical properties of stishovite single crystals. Phys. Usp. 45, 447–448 (2002).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. McMeeking, R. M. & Evans, A. G. Mechanics of transformation-toughening in brittle materials. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 65, 242–246 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Budiansky, B., Hutchinson, J. W. & Lambropoulos, J. C. Continuum theory of dilatant transformation toughening in ceramics. Int. J. Solids and Structures 19, 337–355 (1983).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Trunec, M. & Chlup, Z. Higher fracture toughness of tetragonal zirconia ceramics through nanocrystalline structure. Scripta Mater. 61, 56–59 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Bradt, R. C., Newnham, R. E. & Biggers, J. V. The toughness of jade. Amer. Mineral. 58, 727–732 (1973).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Nakamura, E. & Sato, K. Managing the scarcity of chemical elements. Nature Mater. 10, 158–161 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Anstis, G. R., Chantikul, P., Lawn, B. R. & Marshall, D. B. A critical evaluation of indentation techniques for measuring fracture toughness: I, direct crack measurements. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 64, 533–538 (1981).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank H. Hosono, H. Yamane, S. Tsuneyuki, I. Yamada, M. Yuki, H, Yavas and M. Wilke for helpful discussions. We are grateful to I. Tanaka for allowing us to use computational resources in Kyoto University to perform first-principles calculations and for useful discussions. We also thank J. Michalikova, H-P. Liermann, M. Miyakawa, F. Kawamura, T. Ikeda, K. Fujimaki and T. Shinmei for technical assistance. We are grateful to W. Drube, H. Franz and E. Weckert for encouragement during this study. XANES measurements were performed at SPring-8 (No. 2013B1913 and No. 2014A1224). This research was supported by JST, PRESTO, New Materials Science and Element Strategy granted to N. N.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

N.N. and F.W. designed the research. N.N., T.T., E.K., K.Y. and T.I. synthesized samples by high-pressure experiments. H.O. performed TEM observations and N.N. and H.O. performed FESEM observations. N.N., H.O., M.M., M.T. and T.I. discussed and interpreted images obtained by FESEM observations. N.N., Y.T., H.M. and M.M. performed XANES measurements. H.M. performed first-principles calculations of XANES spectra. N.N. and K.W. measured mechanical properties. N.N., E.K. and J.B. performed XRD measurements and analyzed the data. N.N., F.W., T.T., H.O. and H.M. wrote the paper.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information

supplementary information

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder in order to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nishiyama, N., Wakai, F., Ohfuji, H. et al. Fracture-induced amorphization of polycrystalline SiO2 stishovite: a potential platform for toughening in ceramics. Sci Rep 4, 6558 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06558

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing