Can land use intensification in the Mallee, Australia increase the supply of soluble iron to the Southern Ocean?

Abstract

The supply of soluble iron through atmospheric dust deposition limits the productivity of the Southern Ocean. In comparison to the Northern Hemisphere, the Southern Hemisphere exhibits low levels of dust activity. However, given their proximity to the Southern Ocean, dust emissions from continental sources in the Southern Hemisphere could have disproportionate impact on ocean productivity. Australia is the largest source of dust in the Southern Hemisphere and aeolian transport of dust has major ecological, economic and health implications. In the Mallee, agriculture is a major driver of dust emissions and dust storms that affect Southeastern Australia. In this study, we assess the dust generating potential of the sediment from the Mallee, analyze the sediment for soluble iron content and determine the likely depositional region of the emitted dust. Our results suggest that the Mallee sediments have comparable dust generating potential to other currently active dust sources in the Southern Hemisphere and the dust-sized fraction is rich in soluble iron. Forward trajectory analyses show that this dust will impact the Tasman Sea and the Australian section of the Southern Ocean. This iron-rich dust could stimulate ocean productivity in future as more areas are reactivated as a result of land-use and droughts.

Introduction

Satellite observations show that the most active dust sources on Earth are in the Northern Hemisphere1,2, which accounts for 80 to 90% of the global dust emissions3, while the Southern Hemisphere exhibits relatively low dust concentrations. Atmospheric dust is an important source of iron to the high nutrient low chlorophyll (HNLC) waters of the Southern Ocean4,5, although upwelling6 and hydrothermal activity7 are also considered to be important contributors. Because of the low rates of atmospheric dust deposition in the Southern Hemisphere, the productivity of the Southern Ocean is constrained by the limited supply of soluble iron6,8,9. It has been argued that fluctuations of atmospheric CO2 concentrations during glacial-interglacial transitions can be explained by changes in supply of iron in dust10,11 resulting from changes in dust emissions associated with periods of aridification or revegetation in continental land masses12.

Presently, the main active dust sources in the Southern Hemisphere include the Lake Eyre Basin in Australia, the Makgadikgadi and Etosha pans in southern Africa and the Salar de Uyuni region in Bolivia13. Land-use practices such as deforestation and overgrazing have potential to activate new dust sources in the Southern Hemisphere14,15 with significant impacts to downwind soils and ecosystems. Potential new dust sources that could be activated as an effect of land use have been identified in Patagonia14, the Kalahari16, while in Australia the effect of land use on dust emissions has seldom been investigated in the context of its impact on ocean productivity.

Even though the contribution by dust sources in the Southern Hemisphere to the global dust budget is minimal, these sources could have disproportionately large global impact given the proximity to the Southern Ocean4. Therefore Australia is an ideal laboratory to study the connection between wind erosion, dust transport and ocean productivity. One of the largest dust sources in the Southern Hemisphere13,17, Australia plays an important role in the supply of dust to the Southern Ocean11,18 and adjacent marine and terrestrial systems19,20,21,22. Dust storms in Australia generally coincide with periods of drought23,24,25 and these events can pose serious threats to local economy and human health13,26. For example, it has been estimated that the September 2009 dust storm in New South Wales caused $299 millions in economic damage27. The impact of soil erosion is often manifested also in a reduction of soil fertility and agricultural productivity28. The increased frequency of dust storms has detrimental effects on human health29; for example dust combined with bushfire smoke led to increased mortality in Sydney30 and widespread respiratory illnesses31.

It is believed that Australia was a significant source of dust during the Last Glacial Maximum32, when increased aridity caused intense deflation of sediments from the continental sources to the Tasman Sea33. Satellite records suggest that the Lake Eyre Basin is the primary dust source in Australia1,2 and episodic dust activity is seen in the Strzelecki Desert1,34. Central Australia and the Mallee within the Murray-Darling Basin are identified as other dust sources35. Although evidence of the extent of wind erosion in the Mallee can be found in land degradation surveys as early as the 1930s36, very little is known about the amount of dust that can be emitted from the Mallee. Numerous studies have investigated the impacts of Australian dust on Southern Ocean biogeochemistry5,37,38,39 or adjacent marine systems22,39 however, it is unclear how dust emissions from the Mallee might affect the supply of iron and likely affect the productivity of the Southern Ocean. To this end, this study will assess the dust generating potential of the sediments from the Mallee, analyze the soluble iron content in the dust-sized fraction of the sediments and determine the likely deposition region of the emitted dust. Other studies15,40 have shown that the use of a laboratory dust generator could allow for assessing the potential of sediments to emit dust.

Results

The grain size analysis shows that sediments from the Mallee are sandy with interdunes rich in silt-sized fractions (Table 1). To place these numbers in the broader context of dust emissions potentially supplying iron to the Southern Ocean, we ran the dust generator for sediments from dust sources in Southern Africa, including the southern Kalahari interdunes that could be activated by overgrazing and climate change15, as well as the currently active dust sources of the Makgadikgadi and Etosha pans (Figure 1a). The dust generating potential for sediments from interdunes and dune crests from the agricultural fields of the Mallee region is greater than the salt pan and the Little Desert (Table 2, Figure 1b). PM10 concentrations were on average 74.86 mg m−3 for the dune crests and 80.4 mg m−3 for interdunes. The PM10 concentration of the Little Desert soil is at least one order of magnitude smaller than the interdune and dune sediments (Figure 1b).

Table 1 Study sites in the Mallee. The grain size distribution was analyzed for a subsample of the soil collected from the study sites
Table 2 PM10 values from the dust generator experiment (with ±1 standard deviation)
Figure 1
figure1

(a) Map of the Southern Hemisphere dust sources included in this study (b) PM10 concentration (mg m−3) from the dust generation experiments with ±1 standard deviation. PM10 values from Little Desert Transect are aggregated. (c) The dust potential per unit mass (mg m−3 g−1, with ±1 standard deviation) for the Makgadikgadi Pan (MG), Etosha Pan (ET), southern Kalahari interdunes (ID) and the Mallee dune crests (DC), interdune (ID), salt pan (SP) and little desert (LD) (d) Iron-in-dust potential (μg m−3, with ±1 standard deviation) is calculated by multiplying PM10 concentration with the ferrous ion, Fe(II) (grey bars) and with total soluble iron (FeTS) (white bars). (Information on the PM10 concentration from Southern African dust sources are available in Supplementary Table S1). This map was created in ArcGIS (ESRI, Redlands, CA).

The southern Kalahari interdunes have the greatest dust generating potential and thus preferred for this comparison than vegetated dune crests and bare dunes in the region15. A comparison of dust concentration per unit mass (only for PM10) between the Mallee and the Southern African sediments reveals that the Makgadikgadi Pan sediments have the highest potential (~118 mg m−3 g−1), followed by the Etosha Pan (~77 mg m−3 g−1) and the Mallee soils (~61 mg m−3 g−1 for the dune crests and 69 mg m−3 g−1 for interdunes) (Figure 1c). The southern Kalahari interdunes have a potential of about 7 mg m−3 g−1. PM10 concentration values for sediments collected from the Makgadikgadi Pan (19–435 mg m−3 g−1) and the Mallee dune crests (19–281 mg m−3 g−1) have a broad range of variability (Figure 1c).

The soluble iron content is higher in the parent soil for both ferrous ion, Fe(II) and total soluble iron, FeTS (Table 3). The iron contents of soils from dune crests and interdunes are similar in magnitude for both dust fraction and parent soil. The iron-in-dust potential is a useful measure to assess the potential for soluble iron emissions of different dust sources. It can be expressed as the product of the PM10 concentration to the iron content in the dust fraction. For Fe(II), the iron-in-dust potential is the greatest in soil from the dune crest, followed by interdunes, salt pan and the little desert sediments (Figure 1d). However, for FeTS, the salt pan and the interdune sediments have comparable iron-in-dust potential (Figure 1d).

Table 3 Soluble ferrous, Fe(II) and total soluble iron, FeTs content in mg g−1 of Mallee sediments (with ±1 standard deviation). D denotes the fine fraction less than 45 μm and P is the parent soil

The spatial distribution of the terminal location of the 7-day forward trajectories originating at 500 m a.s.l from the Mallee for the period 1999–2009 shows that the recurrent dust transport pathways from the Mallee are to the South Pacific Ocean (Figure 2).

Figure 2
figure2

The spatial distribution of 7-day forward trajectories between 1999–2009 origininating from the Mallee initiated at 500 m a.s.l.

The percentages are calculated with the total number of terminations in a 5° by 5° grid. This map was created in ArcGIS (ESRI, Redlands, CA).

Discussion

Wind erosion is a major cause of loss of soil resources and land degradation in drylands26 and its intensification often results from the expansion of agriculture41. In Australia, the European colonization led to rapid changes in land use, which contributed to soil erosion and dust emissions42. In the case of the Mallee, the driver of degradation was the development of agriculture and overgrazing, which resulted in some of the highest wind erosion rates in Australia36. Our results show that the potential of the Mallee soils to emit dust is comparable to other currently active dust sources in the Southern Hemisphere (Figure 1c); the deposition of this iron rich dust could possibly alter the productivity and biogeochemical cycling of the South Pacific Ocean.

The percentage of clay and silt sized particles is greater in the Mallee sediments than in the southern Kalahari interdunes (for southern Kalahari grain size data see Bhattachan et al.16). However, we note that the percentage of clay and silt sized particles in soil is not a robust measure of dust generating potential of a source and other mechanisms such as sandblasting and breaking up of loose aggregates during erosion could affect the dust generating potential43. Thus, while a laboratory dust generator is useful in quantifying the amount of dust that can be generated by soil from different sources, it cannot simulate the effect of saltation on dust generation. The dust generating potential of the Mallee soil (both dune crests and interdunes) is much greater than the southern Kalahari interdunes (Figure 1c). The Little Desert Transect has the smallest dust potential compared to the interdune and dune sediments however, the dust generating potential of the well-managed farmlands in southern Kalahari is equal to soil found in the protected and managed Little Desert National Park (Figure 1c). It is also interesting to note that the salt pan in the Mallee does not have a high dust generating potential, unlike the salt pans of Southern Africa. This low dust generating potential of the salt pan sediments in the Mallee could be attributed to the lack of ephemeral streams and lunette dunes that supply sediments rich with fine particles, which are prevalent in the Makgadikgadi and Etosha Pans.

The Fe(II) content in the dust fraction between the sediments from the Mallee interdunes and the southern Kalahari interdunes are equal whereas FeTS is slightly greater in soil in the Mallee44. Because soils in Australia are highly weathered, any iron present in such soils is likely to be in hematite and goethite forms, with low amount of ferrihydrite, which in fact is the most labile form of iron oxide23. Mackie et al.45 suggest that ground-based processes such as weathering and abrasion are credited for low amount of ferrihydrite in dust from Australian sources and any ferrihydrite that is left, it is either transformed to hematite or goethite23 or lost during saltation because of aeolian abrasion46,47. It is suggested that soluble form of iron is likely to be redistributed to smaller grains during saltation45. Our results show that iron present in the Mallee soil is bound in the coarse fraction (Table 3) and the potential of sand grains emitting iron rich fine particles during entrainment could be high. Furthermore, when dust is transported, atmospheric processing especially in clouds is likely to enhance the solubililty and therefore bioavailability of iron48,49.

The dust-storm frequency in Australia reaches the highest during austral spring and summer50 and the main pathway for dust leaving Australia is over the Tasman Sea and south over the Southern Ocean21,38,39. It has been suggested that the deposition of iron-rich Australian dust in the HNLC waters of the Southern Ocean could impact its productivity5. However, in some cases, phytoplankton response was undetected after major dust storms18,23 likely because the timing of the event and light availability, which are other important factors controlling ocean productivity. In fact, the deposition of dust is expected to stimulate blooms later in spring or summer when the ocean is more receptive and light is available39,51. Our results from the forward trajectory analysis (Figure 2) show that dust from the Mallee has higher probability of depositing over the Tasman Sea and the Subantartic Water Ring Province, which is consistent with other studies17,21,38,39. Dust from other sources in Australia, for example, the Lake Eyre Basin (the largest dust source within Australia), however, predominately travels towards the northwest shelf and Great Barrier Reef and not to the Southern Ocean (south of 45° S)51. Hence, an increase in dust emissions from the Mallee of the Murray-Darling Basin could have significant impacts on the productivity of the Tasman Sea and the Southern Ocean.

There is some evidence that dunes in Australia can emit dust, particularly after fire induced vegetation loss52,53. Within the Lake Eyre Basin, only 4% of the emissions originated from the actual lakebed whereas dunes accounted for 37% of the plumes52. Loss of vegetation cover resulting from increased aridification54 and land use (e.g., agriculture, overgrazing) has also been related to the remobilization of stabilized dunefields and enhanced dust emissions in the southern Kalahari16. Given the potentially strong coupling between Australian land-use practices, dust emissions and iron delivery to the HNLC waters of the Southern Hemisphere, intensification of agriculture and land degradation in Australia (and the Mallee in particular) could result in an increase in ocean productivity in the South Pacific Ocean.

Methods

Study sites

Triplicated soil samples (about 50 g) were collected from the top 2 cm of soil from six agricultural sites and a salt pan in the Mallee region (Supplementary Figure S1a). These sites are about 2 km away from the banks of the Murray River in an area with a gently rolling topography resulting from relict dunes (Table 1). Additional sampling was performed in the Little Desert National Park (Victoria, Australia) in a duneland that is currently stabilized by grass and woody vegetation (Supplementary Figure S1b). The study site locations for soil samples collected from the southern Kalahari interdunes and the Makgadikgadi and Etosha Pans are included in supplementary table S1. The grain size distribution of the Mallee soils was measured on a subsample run through a laboratory particle size analyzer (LS 13 320, Beckman Coulter®).

Dust generator

The dust generating potential of the samples collected in the Mallee region of southern Australia and the existing and potential dust sources in Southern Africa was determined using a laboratory dust generator (Custom Products, Big Spring, TX) (Supplementary Figure S1c). Each run was performed with approximately 1 g of soil sample placed in a tube, which rotates around a horizontal pivot axis at the speed of 13 rounds per minute with a 4 s pause between each rotation. A pump draws air from the rotating tube at a rate of 14 L per minute. When the tube is in motion, the sediment falls to the bottom of the tube thereby generating dust. The entrained dust is drawn into the settling chamber where dust concentrations are measured by a dust sensor attached to an aerosol spectrometer (Grimm, Model 1.108). The data units used by the spectrometer are in particle count per liter for particle diameters ranging between 0.3 and 20 μm. The conversion from particle count per liter to concentration (mg m−3) is performed as described in Bhattachan et al.15. PM10 values (particulate matter less than 10 μm in diameter; expressed in mg m−3) are reported in table 2 and table S1.

Soluble iron

The samples were sieved through a 45 μm sieve to separate the dust sized fraction from the parent soil. The dust fraction and parent soil were then analyzed for total soluble iron, FeTs and soluble ferrous ion, Fe(II). To determine the soluble iron content, 10 ml of 0.5 M HCl were added to 0.25 g of sample and the solution was shaken for an hour, filtered through a nucleopore filter to eliminate particulate matter. An acetate buffer was used to raise the pH to 5.5 and a 0.1 M ferrozine was added to the solution to measure the Fe(II) content on a UV photospectrometer (Shimadzu 4100) at 562 nm55. FeTs was measured using the above method after reduction of Fe(II) by adding 0.01 M of hydroxylamine hydrochrolide.

Forward trajectory analysis

The 7-day forward trajectories were determined using Hybrid Singe Particle Langrangian Integrated Trajectory Model (HYSPLIT)56, originating from a point within the Mallee (35.013256° S, 143.255357° E) for years 1999 to 2009. The model used NCEP/NCAR reanalysis dataset for years 1999–2005 and the GDAS1 data for years 2006–2009. Forward trajectories were run at altitude of 500 a.s.l. every day at 05 UTC.

References

  1. Prospero, J. M., Ginoux, P., Torres, O., Nicholson, S. E. & Gill, T. E. Environmental characterization of global sources of atmospheric soil dust identified with the Nimbus 7 Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) absorbing aerosol product. Rev. Geophys. 40, 31, 10.1029/2000rg000095 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Washington, R., Todd, M., Middleton, N. J. & Goudie, A. S. Dust-storm source areas determined by the total ozone monitoring spectrometer and surface observations. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geog. 93, 297–313, 10.1111/1467-8306.9302003 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ginoux, P. et al. Sources and distributions of dust aerosols simulated with the GOCART model. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 20255 (2001).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jickells, T. D. et al. Global iron connections between desert dust, ocean biogeochemistry and climate. Science 308, 67–71, 10.1126/science.1105959 (2005).

    CAS  ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cassar, N. et al. The Southern Ocean biological response to Aeolian iron deposition. Science 317, 1067–1070, 10.1126/science.1144602 (2007).

    CAS  ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Debaar, H. J. W. et al. Importance of iron for plankton blooms and carbon-dioxide drawdown in the Southern Ocean. Nature 373, 412–415, 10.1038/373412a0 (1995).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tagliabue, A. et al. Hydrothermal contribution to the oceanic dissolved iron inventory. Nature Geosci. 3, 252–256, 10.1038/ngeo818 (2010).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Martin, J. H. & Fitzwater, S. E. Iron-deficiency limits phytoplankton growth in the Northeast Pacific Subantartic. Nature 331, 341–343, 10.1038/331341a0 (1988).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Martin, J. H. et al. Testing the Iron Hypothesis in ecosystems of the Equatorial Pacific Ocean. Nature 371, 123–129, 10.1038/371123a0 (1994).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Martin, J. H. Glacial-Interglacial CO2 Change: The Iron Hypothesis. Paleoceanogr. 5, 1–13, 10.1029/PA005i001p00001 (1990).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mahowald, N. et al. Dust sources and deposition during the last glacial maximum and current climate: A comparison of model results with paleodata from ice cores and marine sediments. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 104, 15895–15916, 10.1029/1999jd900084 (1999).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ridgwell, A. J. Dust in the Earth system: the biogeochemical linking of land, air and sea. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London A 360, 2905–2924, 10.1098/rsta.2002.1096 (2002).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Goudie, A. & Middleton, N. Desert dust in the global system. (Springer Verlag, 2006).

  14. McConnell, J. R., Aristarain, A. J., Banta, J. R., Edwards, P. R. & Simoes, J. C. 20th-century doubling in dust archived in an Antartic Peninsula ice core parallels climate change and desertification in South America. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 5743–5748 (2007).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bhattachan, A. et al. The Southern Kalahari: a potential new dust source in the Southern Hemisphere? Environ. Res. Lett. 7, 7, 10.1088/1748-9326/7/2/024001 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bhattachan, A., D'Odorico, P., Okin, G. S. & Dintwe, K. Potential dust emissions from the southern Kalahari's dunelands. J. Geophys. Res.- Earth Surf. 118, 307–314 (2013).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tanaka, T. Y. & Chiba, M. A numerical study of the contributions of dust source regions to the global dust budget. Global Planet. Change 52, 88–104, 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.02.002 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Boyd, P. W. et al. Episodic enhancement of phytoplankton stocks in New Zealand subantarctic waters: Contribution of atmospheric and oceanic iron supply. Global Biogeochem. Cy. 18, 23, 10.1029/2002gb002020 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Knight, A. W., McTainsh, G. H. & Simpson, R. W. Sediment loads in an Australian dust storm - implications for present and past dust processes. Catena 24, 195–213, 10.1016/0341-8162(95)00026-o (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Marx, S. K., Kamber, B. S. & McGowan, H. A. Provenance of long-travelled dust determined with ultra-trace-element composition: a pilot study with samples from New Zealand glaciers. Earth Surf. Proc. Land. 30, 699–716, 10.1002/esp.1169 (2005).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McGowan, H. A., Kamber, B., McTainsh, G. H. & Marx, S. K. High resolution provenancing of long travelled dust deposited on the Southern Alps, New Zealand. Geomorph. 69, 208–221, 10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.01.005 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shaw, E. C., Gabric, A. J. & McTainsh, G. H. Impacts of aeolian dust deposition on phytoplankton dynamics in Queensland coastal waters. Mar. Freshwater Res. 59, 951–962, 10.1071/mf08087 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mackie, D. S. et al. Biogeochemistry of iron in Australian dust: From eolian uplift to marine uptake. Geochem. Geophys. Geosys. 9, 24, 10.1029/2007gc001813 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. McTainsh, G., Chan, Y. C., McGowan, H., Leys, J. & Tews, K. The 23rd October 2002 dust storm in eastern Australia: characteristics and meteorological conditions. Atmos. Environ. 39, 1227–1236, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.10.016 (2005).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shao, Y. & Leslie, L. M. Wind erosion prediction over the Australian continent. J. Geophys. Res.- Atmos. 102, 30091–30105 (1997).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ravi, S. et al. Aeolian processes and the biosphere. Rev. Geophys. 49, Rg3001 10.1029/2010rg000328 (2011).

  27. Tozer, P. & Leys, J. Dust storms - what do they really cost? Rangeland J. 35, 131–142, 10.1071/rj12085 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pimentel, D. et al. Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits. Science 267, 1117–1122 (1995).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Goudie, A. S. Desert dust and human health disorders. Environ. Internat. 63, 101–113 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Johnston, F., Hanigan, I., Henderson, S., Morgan, G. & Bowman, D. Extreme air pollution events from bushfires and dust storms and their association with mortality in Sydney, Australia 1994–2007. Environ. Res. 111, 811–816, 10.1016/j.envres.2011.05.007 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Merrifield, A., Schindeler, S., Jalaludin, B. & Smith, W. Health effects of the September 2009 dust storm in Sydney, Australia: did emergency department visits and hospital admissions increase? Environ. Health 12, 7, 10.1186/1476-069x-12-32 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bullard, J. E. & McTainsh, G. H. Aeolian-fluvial interactions in dryland environments: examples, concepts and Australia case study. Prog. Phys. Geog. 27, 471–501 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hesse, P. P. & McTainsh, G. H. Last glacial maximum to early Holocene wind strength in the mid-latitudes of the Southern Hemisphere from aeolian dust in the Tasman Sea. Quat. Res. 52, 343–349 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mitchell, R. M., Campbell, S. K. & Qin, Y. Recent increase in aerosol loading over the Australian arid zone. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 1689–1699 (2010).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. McTainsh, G. H. & Pitblado, J. R. Dust storms and related phenomena measured from meteorological records in Australia. Earth Surf. Proc. Land. 12, 415–424, 10.1002/esp.3290120407 (1987).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. McTainsh, G. H., Lynch, A. W. & Burgess, R. C. Wind Erosion in Eastern Australia. Austral. J. Soil Res. 28, 323–339, 10.1071/sr9900323 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bowie, A. R. et al. Biogeochemical iron budgets of the Southern Ocean south of Australia: Decoupling of iron and nutrient cycles in the subantarctic zone by the summertime supply. Global Biogeochem. Cy. 23, 14, 10.1029/2009gb003500 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gabric, A. J., Cropp, R., Ayers, G. P., McTainsh, G. & Braddock, R. Coupling between cycles of phytoplankton biomass and aerosol optical depth as derived from SeaWiFS time series in the Subantarctic Southern Ocean. Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 4, 10.1029/2001gl013545 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gabric, A. J. et al. Australian dust storms in 2002–2003 and their impact on Southern Ocean biogeochemistry. Global Biogeochem. Cy. 24, 17, 10.1029/2009gb003541 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Singer, A., Zobeck, T., Poberezsky, L. & Argaman, E. The PM10 and PM2.5 dust generation potential of soils/sediments in the Southern Aral Sea Basin, Uzbekistan. J. Arid Environ. 54, 705–728, 10.1006/jare.2002.1084 (2003).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lal, R. & Stewart, B. A. Soil degradation. Vol. 11 (Springer Verlag, 1990).

  42. McTainsh, G. H. & Leys, J. F. in Land Degradation Processes in Australia. (eds McTainsh, G. H. & Boughton, W. C.) Ch. 7, 188–233 (Longman-Chesire, 1993).

  43. Gill, T. E., Zobeck, T. M. & Stout, J. E. Technologies for laboratory generation of dust from geological materials. J. Hazard. Mat. 132, 1–13 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Bhattachan, A., D'Odorico, P. & Okin, G. S. Biogeochemistry of Southern African Dust. (in review).

  45. Mackie, D., Peat, J., McTainsh, G. H., Boyd, P. & Hunter, K. Soil abrasion and eolian dust production: Implications for iron partitioning and solubility. Geochem. Geophys. Geosys. 7 (2006).

  46. Bullard, J. E. M. G. H. & Pudmenzky, C. Factors affecting the nature and rate of dust production from natural dune sands. Sedimento. 54, 169–182 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Bullard, J. E. & White, K. Dust production and the release of iron oxides resulting from the aeolian abrasion of natural dune sands. Earth Surf. Proc. Land. 30, 95–106 (2005).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Baker, A. & Croot, P. Atmospheric and marine controls on aerosol iron solubility in seawater. Mar. Chem. 120, 4–13 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Mahowald, N. M. et al. Atmospheric global dust cycle and iron inputs to the ocean. Global Biogeochem. Cy. 19 (2005).

  50. McTainsh, G., Lynch, A. & Tews, E. Climatic controls upon dust storm occurrence in eastern Australia. J. Arid Environ. 39, 457–466 (1998).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Cropp, R. A. et al. The likelihood of observing dust-stimulated phytoplankton growth in waters proximal to the Australian continent. J. Mar. Sys. 117, 43–52 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Bullard, J., Baddock, M., McTainsh, G. & Leys, J. Sub-basin scale dust source geomorphology detected using MODIS. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, 6, 10.1029/200nl033928 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Strong, C. L., Bullard, J. E., Dubois, C., McTainsh, G. H. & Baddock, M. C. Impact of wildfire on interdune ecology and sediments: An example from the Simpson Desert, Australia. J. Arid Environ. 74, 1577–1581, 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2010.05.032 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Thomas, D. S. G., Knight, M. & Wiggs, G. F. S. Remobilization of Southern African desert dune systems by twenty-first century global warming. Nature 435, 1218–1221 (2005).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Stookey, L. L. Ferrozine-A New Spectrophotometric Reagent for Iron. Analyt. Chem. 42, 779 (1970).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Draxler, R. R. & Rolph, G. D. (NOAA Air Resour. Lab, Silver Spring, Md., 2003).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the National Science Foundation, through grant EAR 1147545. We are thankful to Noaa Spiekermann and Shamika Ranasinghe for their help with HYSPLIT analysis and Ted Zobeck (USDA-ARS, Lubbock, TX) for sharing with us the design of Lubbock dust generator. We gratefully acknowledge the NOAA Air Resources Laboratory (ARL) for the provision of the HYSPLIT transport and dispersion model and/or READY website (www.arl.noaa.gov/ready.php) used in this publication. This article was published in part thanks to funds provided by the University of Virginia Library Open Access Fund.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.B. and P.D. designed the study; A.B. performed analysis; and both authors contributed to the interpretation of the results and the writing of the paper.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder in order to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhattachan, A., D'Odorico, P. Can land use intensification in the Mallee, Australia increase the supply of soluble iron to the Southern Ocean?. Sci Rep 4, 6009 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06009

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.