Article | Open Access | Published:

Fe2O3 Nanoparticles Wrapped in Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes With Enhanced Lithium Storage Capability

Scientific Reports volume 3, Article number: 3392 (2013) | Download Citation


We have designed a novel hybrid nanostructure by coating Fe2O3 nanoparticles with multi-walled carbon nanotubes to enhance the lithium storage capability of Fe2O3. The strategy to prepare Fe2O3@MWCNTs involves the synthesis of Fe nanoparticles wrapped in MWCNTs, followed by the oxidation of Fe nanoparticles under carbon dioxide. When used as the anode in a Li-ion battery, this hybrid material (70.32 wt% carbon nanotubes, 29.68 wt% Fe2O3) showed a reversible discharge capacity of 515 mAhg−1 after 50 cycles at a density of 100 mAg−1 and the capacity based on Fe2O3 nanoparticles was calculated as 1147 mAhg−1, Three factors are responsibile for the superior performance: (1) The hollow interiors of MWCNTs provide enough spaces for the accommodation of large volume expansion of inner Fe2O3 nanoparticles, which can improving the stability of electrode; (2) The MWCNTs increase the overall conductivity of the anode; (3) A stable solid electrolyte interface film formed on the surface of MWCNTs may reduce capacity fading.


With a fast-developing technology in electric energy storage, Li-ion batteries (LIBs) have become the predominant power source for portable electronics due to their high energy density, long lifespan and environment benignity1,2. Up to now, although great progress have been achieved by using graphite as anode material for commercial LIBs, the lower theoretical capacity (372 mAhg−1) of graphite limits its further practical application3,4,5. Transition metal oxides, as anode materials for LIBs, have gained significant momentum due to their higher theoretical capacities than graphite by the formation of metal simple substance through a chemical conversion mechanism6,7. Among these transition metal oxides materials, Fe2O3 is believed to be a promising candidate to replace graphite because of its high theoretical capacity (1007 mAhg−1), low cost, ease of fabrication and environmental benignity8,9,10. In principle, the lithium storage capacity of Fe2O3 is attributed to the reversible conversion reaction between Li+ ions and Fe2O3, leading to the formation of Fe NPs in a Li2O matrix. Generally, the conversion reaction will results in fast capacity fading of Fe2O3 due to the drastic volume variation and severe destruction of the electrode upon electrochemical cycling. In addition, the low conductivity of Fe2O3 also induces additional performance degradation, especially at high current densities11. Furthermore, during the cycle process, the solid electrolyte interface (SEI) films formed at the interface between Fe2O3 and liquid electrolyte can be broken owing to the shrink of Fe2O3 anode materials. When the fresh Fe2O3 is exposes to the electrolyte again, the thicker of SEI film will increase with each charge/discharge cycle, which obviously leads to a degradation in battery performance12. In order to solve puzzle of Fe2O3 anode materials, all kinds of approach including the synthesis of hollow-structured Fe2O3 have been attempted13,14,15. Although the hollow structure can provide high surface area, short lithium diffusion length to enhance the rate capacity and extra free space to alleviate the volume variation, it is still a challenge to deal with low conductivity and unstable SEI films of Fe2O3 anode materials16.

Fabrication of hybrid nanomaterials with carbon coating has been considered as one of the most effective ways towards high-performance electrode materials for LIBs, especially for the electrode materials with volume variation during the charge-discharge process17. Under the stimulus of their special properties, various carbon-mixed Fe2O3 anode materials have been reported18,19,20,21. Due to their porous structure and execllent electrical conductivity, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are widely used in the filed of preparation of hybrid electrode materials. For example, Zhou et al. have prepared a nanosized Fe2O3 decorated single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) membrane as a high-performance flexible anode for LIBs, showing a discharge capacity of 801 mAhg−1 after 90 cycles. The highly conducting SWCNT network in membrane not only facilitates electron conduction of Fe2O3, but also buffers the strain of Fe2O322. Lou's group have synthesized carbon-coated Fe2O3 hollow nanohorns on the CNTs backbone for superior lithium storage capability. The CNTs backbone and the outmost continuous carbon nanocoating may serve as a structural buffering layer to cushion the internal strain. This hybrid nanomaterial demonstrates a discharge capacity of 820 mAhg−1 after 100 cycles, while CNT@Fe2O3 without carbon coating has a discharge capacity of 660 mAhg−1 23. In addition to the well conductivity, CNTs have other advantages in the application of electrode for LIBs. The hollow interior of CNTs is an ideal carrier for metal oxide NPs, which could provide enough inner space for the large volume expansion of metal oxide NPs in charge/discharge cycling of batteries. Furthermore, a stable SEI film could be formed during lithiation and delithiation because the electrolyte will contact with the outer surface of CNTs. Therefore, the purpose of this work is to design a novel hybrid material with discontinuous Fe2O3 NPs wrapped in MWCNTs and investigated its potential application as an anode material in lithium ion batteries.


Fig. 1 schematically illustrates the procedure to generate Fe2O3@MWCNTs. First, Fe@MWCNTs are synthesized by placing dried ferrocene in a vacuum tube, which has been reported by our group24,25. Firstly, Fe NPs are generated in the decomposition process of ferrocene, then the chemical bonds of C–H are ruptured and the graphitic shells are formed due to the Fe NPs acting as catalysts26. Second, in order to obatin the hybrid nanostructure of Fe2O3@MWCNTs, the Fe@MWCNTs were conducted at high temperature (700°C) using carbon dioxide as surrounding environment for oxidation of Fe NPs and for protection of MWCNTs27. When used as anode material for LIBs, the Fe2O3 NPs react with lithium ions and form Fe NPs in a Li2O matrix during the discharge process, then reversibly react in the charge process. Owing to the structural stability of MWCNTs and discontinuous distribution of Fe2O3 NPs, this volume change of Fe2O3 NPs only occurs in the hollow interior of MWCNTs, which can provide the enough inner space for accommodation of the large volume variation. The larger inner space for enhanced lithium storage capability have been confirmed by previous papers including tin-NPs encapsulated in elastic hollow carbon spheres28, Si NPs encapsulated in continuous hollow carbon tubes29 and hollow carbon nanofiber-encapsulated sulfur30. However, compared with above the amorphous carbon coating, MWCNTs will have a relatively stronger conductivity, which obviously enhance conductivity of Fe2O3 as anode materials.

Figure 1: Schematic illustration of the formation and discharge/charge process of Fe2O3@MWCNTs.
Figure 1

The crystallographic structure of the hybrid material was analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), shown in Fig. 2(a). In black line (Fe@MWCNTs), a relatively strong peak centred at 44.8° and a weak peak centred at 65.2° are observed, which can be indexed as crystalline Fe (110) and (200) diffractions (JCPDF 89-4186), respectively. A weak broadening diffraction peak at 26.3° is well indexed as the (002) reflection of graphite (JCPDF 75-2078). After high temperature oxidation of Fe@MWCNTs using carbon dioxide as oxidant, the sharp diffraction peak at 18.4°, 30.3°, 35.7°, 37.3°, 43.3°, 53.8°, 57.3°, 62.9° can be obviously found, which correspond well to the (111), (220), (311), (222), (400), (422), (511) and (440) crystal planes of iron oxide (JCPDS file 19-0629, Fe2O3, or JCPDS file 39-1346, Fe2O3), respectively. However, it is hard to identify the iron oxides Fe3O4 or gamma-Fe2O3 due to their same spinel structure and similar lattice parameter a (0.8346 nm for gamma-Fe2O3 and 0.8396 nm for Fe3O4)31. Simultaneously, the diffraction peaks of Fe disappear and the peak of graphite still remain, which means the completely conversion from Fe@MWCNTs to iron oxide@MWCNTs.

Figure 2
Figure 2

(a) X-ray diffraction patterns of Fe@MWCNTs and Fe2O3@MWCNTs, (b) Raman spectrum of Fe2O3@MWCNTs, (c) SEM, (d) TEM and (e–f) HRTEM images of Fe2O3@MWCNTs.

Because of the similar XRD pattern of gamma-Fe2O3 and Fe3O4, the Raman spectrum was used to further confirm the composition of the hybrid material. Fig. 2(b) shows the Raman spectrum of Fe2O3@MWCNTs at the range of 100–1900 cm−1. According to the previous report, the peaks located at 216 cm−1, 280 cm−1 and 390 cm−1 should result from one A1g mode and two Eg modes of Fe2O3, respectively32. Meanwhile, compared with standard Fe2O3 Raman spectrum, a small blue-shift may attribute to the interaction between Fe2O3 and MWCNTs33. Moreover, the peak at around 1576 cm−1 involves the in-plane bond stretching motion of pairs of carbon sp2 atoms, which also exists in the G mode with E2g symmetry. The D mode of graphite around 1346 cm−1 is related to the degree of disorder in carbon sp2 bonded clusters in graphite24. Therefore, the two peaks indicate the existence of carbon in the products. In addition, the two peaks can be used to evaluate the extent of carbon-containing defects. From the Raman spectrum, it can be seen that the MWCNTs contain graphitic structures and defects, which may be helpful to enhance the diffusion rate of Li+ ions and electronics.

The morphology and microstructure of Fe@MWCNTs were examined by SEM and TEM, shown in Fig. S1 and Fig. S2. As shown in Fig. S1, the as-obtained Fe@MWCNTs display standard 1D nanostructures. The TEM image shown in Fig. S2(a) reveals that Fe@MWCNTs have nanotube structures with discontinuous Fe NPs wrapped in CNTs. When the size of some Fe nanoparticles is larger than the inner diameter of the CNTs, the wrapped parts of CNTs may deform, which can be observed from Fig. S2(a). Moreover, it is interesting to find that these nanotubes have a hemispherical “Fe nanoparticles cap” at each end of the cylinder (Fig. S2(b)), resulting in large number of nanoparticles to be visible within the micrograph field of view24. After oxidation, the appearance of Fe2O3@MWCNTs had not been changed and remained the 1D nanostructures, which can be clearly seen from the SEM image shown in Fig. 2(c). Furthermore, it can be observed that there are many crevices in the surface of MWCNTs, which is useful to increase the contact area of electrode and electrolyte. The TEM image shown in Fig. 2(d) illustrates that the Fe2O3 NPs are still wrapped in MWCNTs without injuring the wall of MWCNTs. The energy-dispersive X-ray spectrum (Fig. S3) of a single MWCNT indicates the existence of Fe, C and O without other impurity elements. A high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image shown in Fig. 2(e) clearly demonstrates the graphite layer of carbon nanotube and a 10 nm pore diameter of single MWCNT. Another HRTEM image shown in Fig. 2(f) displays the lattice fringes with a space of 0.209 nm, which can be indexed as (400) lattice plane of Fe2O3. The result of the electron microscopy characterization is of good agreement with XRD and Raman characterizations, confirming the successful preparation of Fe2O3@MWCNTs.

For further investigation of the chemical composition of the as-prepared Fe2O3@MWCNTs, the XPS measurements were carried out. Fig. S4 exhibits a wide scan XPS survey spectrum of Fe2O3@MWCNTs between 0 and 1100 eV. The characteristic peaks of C, Fe, and O can be indexed clearly. Meanwhile, the spectrum of Fe 2p is shown in Fig. S5, and the peaks at 710.9 eV and 724.5 eV correspond to the Fe 2p3/2 and Fe 2p1/2, respectively34. The N2 absorption/desorption isotherms at 77 K are shown in Fig. S6 and a characteristic of a type IV with type H3 hysteresis loop. The specific surface area calculated with the BET model is 42.55 m2g−1. The pore size distribution (Fig. S7) has a relatively wide peak of 10 nm, corresponding well with the previous microscopy findings. The mass fraction of Fe2O3 and MWCNTs is 29.68% and 70.32% according to the ICP characterization.


To investigate the electrochemical performance of Fe2O3@MWCNTs, two-electrode 2032 coin cells with Fe2O3@MWCNTs anodes were fabricated with Li metal as the counter electrode. The electrochemical performance of Fe2O3@MWCNTs was firstly evaluated by cyclic voltammetry (CV) in the 0–3.0 V voltage window at the scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1 (Fig. 3(a)). It is clearly seen from the CV curves that there is a substantial difference between the first and the subsequent cycles. There is obviously one reduction peak in the potential of 0.6 V, which appears only in the first cycle. This peak corresponds to the Li+ ions insertion into Fe2O3 and the formation of Li2O. The first anodic scan shows an extended peak between 1.6 V and 1.9 V, which corresponds to oxidation of Fe to Fe3+ ions to re-form Fe2O3. For the second and third curves, a broad reduction peak at 0.85 V is observed, which indicates the reversibility and capacity stability. This broadening is due to the amorphous nature/crystal structure destruction of the electrode material34. Fig. 3(b) shows the discharge and charge voltage profiles of different cycles at a current density of 100 mAg−1, in good agreement with the CV measurements. A plateau at 0.75 V can be observed only in the first discharge voltage profile, which means the formation of Fe and Li2O, corresponding to the peaks in CV curves. In the subsequent discharge profiles, the plateau moves to 0.9 V because of the change of crystalline structure in the first cycle35. When the discharged electrode has been charged to 3.0 V, a smooth voltage profile is observed until 1.5 V which is followed by sloping voltage plateau up to 2.0 V and a steep rise up to 3.0 V, implying the regeneration of Fe2O3. The discharge and charge capacities of the 1st cycle are 870 and 573 mAhg−1, respectively, with an initial coulombic efficiency of 65.9%. The discharge capacity of the 2nd cycle is 580 mAhg−1. Such an irreversible capacity (290 mAhg−1) is attributed to the formation of SEI layer and irreversible electrochemical reactions between lithium ions and electrode material.

Figure 3
Figure 3

(a) Cyclic voltammetry of Fe2O3@MWCNTs between 3 and 0 V at a scan rate of 0.1 mVs−1, (b) Galvanostatic discharge/charge voltage profiles of Fe2O3@MWCNTs at a current density of 100 mAg−1, (c) Discharge capacities versus cycle number of Fe2O3@MWCNTs, MWCNTs, the composite and commercial Fe2O3 at the current density of 100 mAg−1 between 3 and 0 V, (d) Discharge and charge capacity of Fe2O3@MWCNTs at different current densities between 3 and 0 V.

To investigate the impact of unique structure of Fe2O3@MWCNTs on lithium storage capability, the coin cells based on MWCNTs, commercial Fe2O3, the composite of Fe2O3 and MWCNTs (same mass ratio with Fe2O3@MWCNTs) have been assembled and test under the same condition with Fe2O3@MWCNTs. The curves of capacity versus cycle number at a current density of 100 mAg−1 were shown in Fig. 3(c). Compared with the contrast, Fe2O3@MWCNTs exhibited a reasonable cycle performance. Despite the capacity decayed in the first cycle, even after 50 cycles, the discharge capacity can retain a value of 515 mAhg−1. Simultaneously, the initial coulombic efficiency of 47% recovered to 96% in the second cycle, and maintained almost 95% in the subsequent cycles (Fig. S8). As a comparison, MWCNTs, commercial Fe2O3 and the composite only exhibited the 50th discharge capacities of 248 mAgh−1, 130 mAhg−1 and 192 mAhg−1, respectively. Although the discharge capacity of Fe2O3@MWCNTs is not larger than the previous reports of Fe2O3/CNTs composite anode owing to the relatively low loading ratio of Fe2O3 nanoparticles. However, according to the discharge capacity (Fe2O3@MWCNTs: 515 mAhg−1, MWCNTs: 248 mAhg−1) and mass ratio (Fe2O3: 29.68%, MWCNTs: 70.32%), the discharge capacity contributed by Fe2O3 NPs can be calculated as 1147 mAhg−1 (Fig. S9), which is higher than the previous reports8,9,10,11,13,14,15,18,19,20,21. This high value is even larger than the theoretical capacity of Fe2O3 (1007 mAhg−1), suggesting that such a MWCNTs wrapping structure can enhance the lithium storage capability of Fe2O3 and ensure the complete reaction between Fe2O3 and Li+ ions. As mentioned above, Fe2O3 NPs react with Li+ ions and cause volume change inside MWCNTs. Furthermore, a stable SEI film can form in the outside of MWCNTs. Thus, Fe2O3@MWCNTs exhibits higher and more stable lithium storage capability than commercial Fe2O3 and the composite. Although the commercial Fe2O3 shows a high initial discharge capacity of 1152 mAhg−1, the capacity suffers a fast fading in the following cycles. When tested at the current density of 500 mAg−1, Fe2O3@MWCNTs also delivered a discharge capacity of 430 mAgh−1 after 40 cycles (Fig. S10), which is better than that for commercial graphite anodes.

In addition to the cycling performance, the high-rate capability is also important especially for high-power applications. Benefited from the unique hybrid structure, the Fe2O3@MWCNTs exhibited an excellent rate performance which is shown in Fig. 3(d). Even cycled at a high rate of 2000 mAg−1 (3.6 C), this material can still deliver an average discharge of 320 mAhg−1. When the current rate is restored to 100 mAg−1, a stable capacity of 520 mAhg−1 is resumed.

For revealing the structural evolution of Fe2O3@MWCNTs, the electrode after 50 cycles was examined by TEM, which is shown in Fig. 4(a). The structure of a single MWCNT is well preserved, implying the excellent stability of the graphite wall. It has been reported that CNTs can enhance the electrical conductivity transition metal oxide36. Because of the existence of large amount of MWCNTs, Fe2O3@MWCNTs exhibit much lower resistance than the bare Fe2O3, as evidenced by the drastically reduced diameter of the semicircle at high-frequency region in the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) patterns (Fig. 4(b)). Moreover, Waki's group has proven that the defects on MWCNTs had positive effects on Li storage property37. According to the Raman spectrum shown in Fig. 2b, there is a sharp peak of D mode of graphite around 1346 cm−1 which is related to the degree of disorder in carbon sp2 bonded clusters in graphite. This confirms that MWCNTs have a large amount of defects such as graphitic edges and disordered structures. From the SEM image in Fig. 2c, it can also be seen some crevices in the surface of MWCNTs, which are useful for the accessing of electrolyte into the hollow interior of MWCNTs. Thus the Li+ ions diffusion and electron transfer are also facilitated to give the greatly enhanced electrochemical performance of Fe2O3@MWCNTs. Besides, the synergistic effect between Fe2O3 and MWCNTs, for example, storing Li+ ions in the interface between Fe2O3 and MWCNTs, can also enhance the discharge capacity.

Figure 4
Figure 4

(a) TEM image of the Fe2O3@MWCNTs after 50 cycles, (b) Nyquist plots of ac impedance spectra of Fe2O3@MWCNTs and commercial Fe2O3.

In summary, we have designed and synthesized a novel hybrid nanomaterial of Fe2O3 NPs wrapped in multi-walled carbon nanotubes. This hybrid nanostructure exhibits a discharge capacity of 515 mAhg−1, after 50 cycles as anode electrode for LIBs, while the capacity is calculated as 1147 mAhg−1 based on the mass ratio of Fe2O3 NPs. Such an enhanced property could be attributed to the unique structure of MWCNTs wrapping, which not only accommodates the large volume variation but also enhances the overall conductivity. Moreover, a stable SEI film formed on the surface of MWCNTs also reduces capacity fading. This hybrid structure can be also applied to enhancing other electrode materials.



All chemicals are of analytical grade and used without purification. The synthesis of Fe2O3 nanoparticles wrapped in multi-walled carbon nanotubes (Fe2O3@MWCNTs) contains two steps: Synthesis of Fe nanoparticles wrapped in multi-walled carbon nanotubes (Fe@MWCNTs) and Oxidation of Fe nanoparticles to Fe2O3 nanoparticles. The synthesis method of Fe@MWCNTs has been reported by our group24. In a typical synthesis, dried ferrocene (0.02 g) were placed into a quartz tube with the inner diameter of 12 mm and effective heating length 150 mm. After being vacuumed, the quartz tube containing ferrocene was sealed. After that, the quartz tube was placed into a tube furnace and heated to 200°C and maintained for 1 h so that the ferrocene can be slowly sublimed in the quartz tube. Subsequently, in order to gradually decompose ferrocene inthe quartz tube, the tube furnace was heated to and maintainedat 400°C for 1 h. Finally, the tube furnace was heated to and maintained at 950°C. After 4 h, the tube furnace was naturally cooled to room temperature. After breaking the quartz tube and intense sonication for 30 min in a beaker, a black solution was obtained and the black products were collected under the induction of a magnet with 0.20 T and washed with ethanol for three times. Then the as-prepared Fe@MWCNTs were oxidized to Fe2O3@MWCNTs using carbon dioxide. The annealing process in carbon dioxide was performed at 700°C for 30 min with a heat rate of 10°C min−1 to obtain Fe2O3@MWCNTs.


The powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were collected on a Japan Rigaku D/MAX-cA X-ray diffractometer equipped with Cu Ka radiation over the 2θ range of 10–80°. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were performed on a JEOL JSM-6700M scanning electron microscope. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained on a Hitachi H-800 transmission electron microscope, using an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images was taken on a JEOL-2010 transmission electron microscope, which was operated at 200 kV. Energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis was obtained with an EDAX detector installed on the same HRTEM. The Raman spectrum was taken on a LABRAM-HR Confocal Laser Micro-Raman spectrometer using an Ar+ laser with 514.5 nm at room temperature. X-ray Photoelectron Spectrum (XPS) was performed on an ESCALAB 250 X-ray Photoelectron Spectrometer with Al Ka radiation. Specific surface areas were calculated from the results of N2 physisorption at 77 K (Micromeritics ASAP 2020) by using the BET (Brunauer–Emmet–Teller) and BJH (Barrett–Joyner–Halenda). 1 mg Fe2O3@MWCNTs was dissolved in 50 mL hydrochloric acid (concentration: 1 molL−1). After intense sonication for 10 min, the mixed solution was transferred into a 75 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave and maintained at 120°C for 8 h and then naturally cooled to room temperature. After centrifuging, the concentration of iron ions in solution was measured using indictive coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (Atomscan Advantage).

Electrochemical measurements

The electrochemical behavior of the as-prepared Fe2O3@MWCNTs was examined using CR2032 coin type cells vs. Li with 1 M LiPF6 in ethylene carbonate and diethyl carbonate (EC:DEC = 1:1, v/v) as the electrolyte. The working electrode was fabricated by compressing a mixture of the active materials, conductive material (acetylene black), and binder (polyvinylidene fluoride) in a weight ratio of Fe2O3@MWCNTs/carbon/PVDF = 7:1:2 onto a copper foil current collector, then drying at 60°C for 12 h. The cells were assembled in an argon-filled glove box (MBraun Labmaster 130). The electrode capacity was measured by a galvanostatic discharge-charge method in the voltage range between 3 V and 0 V at a current density of 100 mA g−1 on a battery test system (Neware CT-3008W). Cyclic voltammetry was performed using an electrochemical workstation (CHI 660C) between 0–3 V at a scan rate of 0.1 mVs−1. The impedance spectra of the cells were measuredon an electrochemical workstation (CHI 660C) in the frequency range of 0.001–100 kHz.


  1. 1.

    & Building better batteries. Nature 451, 652–657 (2008).

  2. 2.

    , & Nanomaterials for rechargeable lithium batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 2930–2946 (2008).

  3. 3.

    & Challenges for rechargeable Li batteries. Chem. Mater. 22, 587–603 (2009).

  4. 4.

    , , & Recent developments in nanostructured anode materials for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 2682–2699 (2011).

  5. 5.

    et al. Hollow Porous SiO2 Nanocubes Towards High-performance Anodes for Lithium-ion Batteries. Sci. Rep. 3, 1568; 10.1038/srep01568 (2013).

  6. 6.

    , , , & Nano-sized transition-metal oxides as negative-electrode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Nature 407, 496–499 (2000).

  7. 7.

    et al. Co3O4 nanocages for high-performance anode material in lithium-ion batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 7227–7235 (2012).

  8. 8.

    , , , & Synthesis of hematite (r-Fe2O3) nanorods: diameter-size and shape effects on their applications in magnetism, lithium ion battery, and gas sensors. J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 17806–17812 (2006).

  9. 9.

    & 1D hollow a-Fe2O3 electrospun nanofibers as high performance anode material for lithium ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 23049–23056 (2012).

  10. 10.

    , , , & Formation of Fe2O3 Microboxes with Hierarchical Shell Structures from Metal−Organic Frameworks and Their Lithium Storage Properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 17388–17391 (2012).

  11. 11.

    , , & Spindle-like Mesoporous α-Fe2O3 Anode Material Prepared from MOF Template for High-Rate Lithium Batteries. Nano Lett. 12, 4988–4991 (2012).

  12. 12.

    et al. Stable cycling of double-walled silicon nanotube battery anodes through solid-electrolyte interphase control. Nat. Nanotech. 7, 310–315 (2012).

  13. 13.

    , , , & Quasiemulsion-templated formation of α-Fe2O3 hollow spheres with enhanced lithium storage properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 17146–17148 (2011).

  14. 14.

    , , , & Uniform hematite nanocapsules based on an anode material for lithium ion batteries. Electrochem. Commun. 12, 382–385 (2010).

  15. 15.

    et al. Nanoparticulate iron oxide tubes from microporous organic nanotubes as stable anode materials for lithium ion batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 6626–6630 (2012).

  16. 16.

    , & Metal oxide hollow nanostructures for lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 24, 1903–1911 (2012).

  17. 17.

    et al. Graphene/metal oxide composite electrode materials for energy storage. Nano Energy 1, 107–131 (2012).

  18. 18.

    et al. Nanoengineered polypyrrole-coated Fe2O3@C multifunctional composites with an improved cycle stability as lithium-ion anodes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 1692–1700 (2013).

  19. 19.

    et al. Simple fabrication of a Fe2O3/carbon composite for use in a high-performance lithium ion battery. Carbon 52, 565–573 (2013).

  20. 20.

    et al. α-Fe2O3 nanoparticle-loaded carbon nanofibers as stable and high-capacity anodes for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 4, 2672–2679 (2012).

  21. 21.

    et al. Carbon-encapsulated Fe3O4 nanoparticles as a high-rate lithium ion battery anode material. ACS. Nano 7, 4459–4469 (2013).

  22. 22.

    et al. A nanosized Fe2O3 decorated single-walled carbon nanotube membrane as a high-performance flexible anode for lithium ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 17942–17946 (2012).

  23. 23.

    , , , & Assembling carbon-coated α-Fe2O3 hollow nanohorns on the CNT backbone for superior lithium storage capability. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 5252–5256 (2012).

  24. 24.

    et al. Fe nanoparticle-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes: one-pot synthesis and their applications in magnetic removal of heavy metal ions. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 9230–9236 (2012).

  25. 25.

    et al. Iron encapsulated within pod-like carbon nanotubes for oxygen reduction reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 371–375 (2013).

  26. 26.

    , , & Carbon nanotubes and spheres produced by modified ferrocene pyrolysis. Chem. Mater. 14, 3990–3994 (2002).

  27. 27.

    , , , & Fe3O4 anchored onto helical carbon nanofibers as high-performance anode in lithium-ion batteries. ChemSusChem. 5, 1397–1400 (2012).

  28. 28.

    et al. Tin-nanoparticles encapsulated in elastic hollow carbon spheres for high-performance anode material in lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 20, 1160–1165 (2008).

  29. 29.

    et al. Engineering empty space between Si nanoparticles for lithium-ion battery anodes. Nano Lett. 12, 904–909 (2012).

  30. 30.

    , , , & Hollow carbon nanofiber-encapsulated sulfur cathodes for high specific capacity rechargeable lithium batteries. Nano Lett. 11, 4462–4467 (2011).

  31. 31.

    The structure of ferromagnetic ferric oxide. J. Philos. Mag. 12, 1089–1106 (1931).

  32. 32.

    , & Raman microspectroscopy of some iron oxides and oxyhydroxides. J. Raman Spectrosc. 28, 873–878 (1997).

  33. 33.

    , , , & Platinum-maghemite core-shell nanoparticles using a sequential synthesis. Nano Lett. 3, 261–264 (2003).

  34. 34.

    et al. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 12198–12204 (2012).

  35. 35.

    et al. Fe3O4–pyrolytic graphite oxide composite as an anode material for lithium secondary batteries. Electrochimica Acta. 90, 426–432 (2013).

  36. 36.

    et al. Origin of bonding between the SWCNT and the Fe3O4(001) surface and the enhanced electrical conductivity. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2, 2853–2858 (2011).

  37. 37.

    , & Nano-drilled multiwalled carbon nanotubes: characterizations and application for LIB anode materials. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 25167–25173 (2012).

Download references


This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (NSFC, U1232211, 21071137) and Foundation of National Science Base (20772188).

Author information


  1. Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at Microscale, Department of Materials Science & Engineering & Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, P. R. China

    • Nan Yan
    • , Xuhui Zhou
    • , Yan Li
    • , Fang Wang
    • , Hao Zhong
    •  & Qianwang Chen
  2. Department of Chemistry, College of Staten Island, and The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, Staten Island, NY 10314, USA

    • Hui Wang


  1. Search for Nan Yan in:

  2. Search for Xuhui Zhou in:

  3. Search for Yan Li in:

  4. Search for Fang Wang in:

  5. Search for Hao Zhong in:

  6. Search for Hui Wang in:

  7. Search for Qianwang Chen in:


Q.W.C. and N.Y. designed the research, analysed data and wrote the paper. N.Y. and X.H.Z. carried out the electrochemical and physical measurements. H.Z., Y.L., F.W. and H.W. performed electrochemical measurements and other characterization.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qianwang Chen.

Supplementary information

Word documents

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    supporting information

About this article

Publication history





Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.