Abstract
The quasionedimensional, chiral crystal structure of Selenium has fascinating implications: we report simultaneous magnetic and ferroelectric order in single crystalline Se microtubes below ≈40 K. This is accompanied by a structural transition involving a partial fragmentation of the infinite chains without losing overall crystalline order. Raman spectral data indicate a coupling of magnons with phonons and electric field, while the dielectric constant shows a strong dependence on magnetic field. Our firstprinciples theoretical analysis reveals that this unexpected multiferroic behavior originates from Selenium being a weak topological insulator. It thus exhibits stable electronic states at its surface, and magnetism emerges from their spin polarization. Consequently, the broken twofold rotational symmetry permits switchable polarization along its helical axis. We explain the observed magnetoelectric couplings using a Landau theory based on the coupling of phonons with spin and electric field. Our work opens up a new class of topological surfacemultiferroics with chiral bulk structure.
Introduction
Multiferroic materials in which ferromagnetism and ferroelectricity not only coexist but are intrinsically coupled are of great technological interest and have been a subject of intense research^{1,2,3}. Biferroic behavior has so far been seen in either lowsymmetry, complex oxides^{4} or composite multiphase materials^{5,6,7}.The mutually exclusive nature of ferromagnetism and ferroelectricity is ascribed to symmetry restrictions as well as conflicting chemical requirements^{8}. A possible solution is offered by systems in which different ions or functional groups are responsible for different types of ferroic order. In such ‘TypeI’ multiferroics, magnetism and ferroelectricity originate independently from different sublattices (e.g., BiFeO_{3}^{9,10}) and necessarily exhibit a weak coupling. In ‘TypeII’ multiferroics, on the other hand, ferroelectricity is induced by certain types of noncollinear (e.g., cycloidal) spin order that breaks inversion symmetry. Such systems (that include certain rare earth manganites^{11,12}) show an intrinsic coupling between the ferroelectric and magnetic order parameters^{13,14}.
Very recently, a particularly interesting connection has been suggested between multiferroic systems and topological insulators^{15,16}. The geometric part of the orbital magnetoelectric coupling in 3dimensional topological insulators has been shown to be analogous to polarization or the geometric phase of 1D topological insulators. While the former relates to ChernSimons 3form, the latter corresponds to ChernSimons 1form, and hence these properties are quantized in topological insulators. These novel ideas are yet to be demonstrated experimentally through identification of topological insulators exhibiting magnetoelectric coupling. It is relatively simpler to think of a 3D insulator with quasi1D structure of special symmetry that would exhibit a quantized polarization, and hence a surface charge. A possible spontaneous magnetic ordering of this surface charge can potentially give rise to interesting types of magnetoelectric coupling under certain symmetry conditions, and is shown here to manifest in one of the simplest materials, elemental selenium.
Even though the earliest known elemental semiconductor and photoconductor, Se^{17}, has an unusual, quasioneD, chiral structure, it has attracted little attention as a potential multiferroic. The crystal structure of trigonal Se (space group P3_{1}21) consists of parallel, helical atomic chains with three atoms per unit cell. The atoms within a helix are covalently bonded, and the weakly coupled helical chains are arranged on a hexagonal lattice. With a 4 s^{2}p^{4} configuration, Se was so far believed to be an insulator with no magnetic ordering^{18,19}. We have, however, found evidence for both magnetic and ferroelectric order in Se microtubes below ≈40 K. Both our experimental and theoretical studies suggest that the magnetic ordering occurs mainly at the crystal surface. Further, though bulk Se is insulating, our electronic structure calculations show metallic behavior at its surface, which is shown to originate from a nontrivial topology of electronic states of bulk Se. This explains why the phenomenon was missed earlier in bulk Se, while we succeeded in capturing it in samples of reduced dimensionality. The complex, chiral structure and consequent nontrivial electronic topology of Selenium are ultimately responsible for the unprecedented observation of multiferroic order in an elementary system. This obviously suggests that other materials with similar structure should also be investigated for multiferroic behavior.
Results
Observation of magnetization and electrical polarization in Se
Our studies involved perfect single crystals of Se in the form of hexagonallyfaceted, hollow microtubes: ≈5 mm long and 50–300 μm in diameter (Fig. 1(a)), grown by vapor transport with an amorphous Se pellet (99.999%) as precursor. The Xray diffraction pattern matched perfectly with trigonal Se (Fig. 1(b)), while transmission electron microscopy showed excellent crystalline order (Fig. 1(c)) and no surface contamination. Energy dispersive Xray analysis indicated 100% Se and Xray fluorescence analysis showed about 1% Sulfur, but no other impurities down to a detection limit of 10–100 ppm.
Magnetic hysteresis measurements were performed in the 2–100 K range on a bunch of ≈10 microtubes with field parallel to the long axis of the rods. At 2 K, the samples showed complete saturation of magnetization, with the MH curve indicating either antiferromagnetic or weak (canted) ferromagnetic behavior (Fig. 2(a)). The saturation of magnetization gradually disappears with increasing temperature. The temperature dependence of the saturation magnetization (Fig. 2(b)) indicates a transition temperature near 40 K, also supported by Raman data. Ferroelectric hysteresis measurements were carried out with the sample dipped in liquid N_{2} and liquid He, to negate the effect of heating caused by the large applied voltage. At 4.2 K, the data clearly indicate polarization saturation and hence ferroelectric order (Fig. 2(c)). At 77 K, the sample exhibited large area loops expected from a lossy dielectric. An expanded view of the 4 K data (Fig. 2(c), inset) supports the ferroelectric nature of the ordering. The increase in the dielectric loss at higher temperature (well above T_{C}) occurs because Selenium is a semiconductor. At low temperatures (in the ferroelectric phase), it is basically insulating. As the temperature rises, charge carriers are increasingly available in the conduction band, as reflected in the observed lossy hysteresis loop at 77 K. Capacitance measurements at different frequencies with voltage applied parallel to the rods show a prominent peak at ≈ 40 K (Fig. 2(d)), which indicates the ferroelectric ordering temperature. Up to 80 kHz, these data remain essentially unchanged, as dielectric dispersion effects are expected only at higher frequencies. Further confirmation is provided by pyroelectric measurements performed by first cooling the Se microtubes in an electric field applied along the caxis, followed by a measurement of the temperature dependence of the absolute charge. We observed a clear, reversible pyroelectric signal below ≈ 50 K (Supplementary Information: Fig. S1). Both the ferroelectric loop and the pyroelectric signal are somewhat asymmetric with respect to the polarity of the applied field. This indicates a history dependence which is discussed later.
Observation of spinchargelattice (phonon) coupling
Crucial insights pertaining to the spinchargelattice coupling – central to the nature of the multiferroic behaviour – are provided by Raman spectroscopy. At 300 K, we observed a single intense mode at 232 cm^{−1} (Fig. 3, bottom), which has been identified as the E phonon in trigonal Se^{20}. However, at 4 K, we also observed intense modes in the 400–750 cm^{−1} region. The extended nature of these modes and the multiple features associated with them indicate that they arise from higher order, nonphononic elementary excitations – which we believe to be magnons. These modes are resonantly enhanced at 647.1 nm and barely observable at other wavelengths (Supplementary Information: Fig. S2). We could confirm the magnonic origin of these modes by simply applying an external magnetic field: even a relatively small field (≈0.1 kOe) severely distorted these modes, while the phonon mode was not affected. The shaded regions in Fig. 3 show the imaginary part of the Raman response function: χ″(ω) ~ I(ω)/[1 + n(ω)] at different temperatures (I(ω) = Raman scattering intensity, ω = Stokes shift and the Bose factor, n(ω) = 1/[exp(ℏω/kT) − 1]). The area under the magnon spectrum shows rapid extinction in the 30–50 K range (Fig. 4(a)), though weak magnetic fluctuations probably persist until 100 K, consistent with the temperature dependence of the magnetization (Fig. 2(b)). This supports our assignment of these high frequency spectral features to higher order magnon modes. It is important to reiterate at this point that all our data indicate that – within experimental uncertainty  the magnetic and ferroelectric transition temperatures are practically coincident (40±10 K).
The possibility of magnetoelectric coupling was probed by applying a dc electric field normal to the Se microrods, using a specially fabricated holder. Fig. 4(b) shows that the magnon frequencies are strongly affected by the applied field, while the phonon frequency remains almost constant (Supplementary Information: Fig. S3). Further, the magnon frequency shift changes sign with the electric field direction. This important observation (along with the magnetic field dependence of the dielectric response) is an unambiguous manifestation of the coupling between the charge and spin order parameters. Magnetoelectric coupling in the system is conclusively proven by the magnetic field dependence of the dielectric response: the peak in the dielectric response disappears in an applied magnetic field of 2 T (Fig. 4(c)). The Raman data provides another significant input: the phonon mode intensity falls sharply in the vicinity of the magnetic transition temperature, though it does not vanish (Fig. 4(a)). This indicates a strong spinphonon coupling in the system.
The relatively low value of the saturation magnetization of the Se microtubes (M_{S} ≈10^{−3} μ_{B}/atom at 2 K) indicates a surface origin (note that 0.1–0.01% of the Se atoms reside on the tube surface). This is corroborated by our observation that for two samples with different average tube diameters, M_{S} scales roughly with the specific surface area (Fig. 2(b)).
Firstprinciples theory of electronic structure and topology of Se
We now discuss the possible origin of the surface moments in the Se microstructures. Our firstprinciples calculations based on density functional theory (DFT) with generalized gradient approximation (GGA) to exchange correlation energy estimate the structural parameters: a = 4.47Å and c = 5.04Å, within 3% of their reported values^{21}. We find an indirect band gap of 1.1 eV, which is underestimated with respect to the experimental value^{22} by ≈41% (a known limitation of the DFT method). For bulk Se, our calculations with local spin or magnetic moments on Se sites initialized with ferromagnetic (FM) and antiferromagnetic (AFM) ordering resulted in a state with vanishing magnetic moments, confirming our earlier prediction^{19} that bulk Se is nonmagnetic.
We next investigated the possible presence of magnetic moments in 2–8 atom, helical chains of Se, initialized with different types of magnetic order along the chains. For all except the 3atom chains, the selfconsistent electronic ground state clearly exhibits an ordering of magnetic moments, with the moments confined to the ends of the chains (Supplementary Information: Fig. S4). For oddatom chains, the initial AFM state deevolved into a FM state, while evenatom chains exhibit stable ordering of both AFM and FM types, with very similar energies. This supports our contention that the observed magnetism originates from the surface or boundary. In this connection, the appearance of a weak Raman line at ≈250 cm^{−1} (Fig. 3) at low temperatures is significant. It indicates the nucleation of the αmonoclinic structure^{23} as a minority phase within the (majority) trigonal structure. Evidence for the partial nucleation of this αmonoclinic phase at low temperatures is also seen in temperaturedependent XRD measurements. We propose that these small, second phase nuclei merely act as somewhat extended point defects and cause the fragmentation of the infinite helical chains of trigonal Se into shorter fragments, without an overall loss of crystal symmetry.
To simulate the (0001) surface, we studied slabs consisting of 10 and 11 atomic planes separated from its periodic images by a vacuum of 1 nm along cdirection and initialized with AFM and FM ordering of spins at its surface. The nonmagnetic state of the slab exhibits a metallic electronic structure (Fig. 5(a)), and the bands crossing the Fermi energy are localized at the surfaces. As Se is quasionedimensional, we expect this electronic structure to be unstable possibly with respect to magnetic ordering. Keeping in mind that magnetism in graphene nanoribbons arising from its edge states is stabilized by onsite correlation^{24}, we simulated the Se slab by including onsite correlation with Hubbard U = 1 eV to 5 eV, and initial states with AFM and FM ordering. For all the Hubbard U values, magnetic moments and the nature of electronic structure (with band gap increasing with U) of the selenium slab remain qualitatively the same (see Supplementary Information: Fig. S5). In contrast to bulk Se, the selfconsistent solution exhibits nonzero (~0.5 μ_{B}/atom) local magnetic moments on the surface atoms even after structural relaxation. The relaxed structures with AFM and FM configurations are energetically the same, implying only a weak interaction between the moments at the opposite slabsurfaces. A band gap opens up in the electronic structure upon magnetic ordering at the Se slab surfaces (Fig. 5(b) and (c)), and the visualization of the spindensity isosurfaces (Figs. 5(d) and (e)) clearly shows that the surface states are responsible for the magnetic character of the slabs. An increase in the onsite correlation energy U results in further stabilization of the surface spins and their ordering.
The robustness of the surface states of the Se slab and their resemblance to the localized states at the end of single helical chains of Se prompt us to trace their origin to the electronic topology^{25} of bulk Se. As Se has a quasionedimensional structure, we note that the relevant topological invariant is essentially the Berry phase of occupied electronic states, which is essentially the polarization^{26}. Symmetry considerations predict zero polarization in the ab plane as well as along the caxis of bulk Se. Berryphase calculations confirm the former expectation but predict a halfinteger quantum polarization, P_{z} = e/A along zaxis (e = electronic charge, A = unit cell area). This does not violate symmetry principles, since polarization – as a Berry phase – can be estimated only within an integer quantum polarization. Thus, P and −P (obtained by applying inversion symmetry or a twofold rotation along an axis in the abplane in case of Se) may differ by an integer quantum; hence a halfinteger quantum polarization is allowed by symmetry even in centrosymmetric systems^{27}. We believe bulk Se is the only system known so far to exhibit a halfinteger quantum electronic polarization (i.e. the electronic structure of bulk Se has an overall Berry phase of π) and its total (ionic + electronic) polarization remains invariant upon any shift in origin. This would naturally support electronic charge at the surfaces and consequently the magnetism. Ordering of spins at the surface breaks the twofold symmetry of Se (see Figure 5) and gives rise to a switchable polarization. This necessarily implies that the ferroelectric and magnetic ordering temperatures are identical, in conformity with our experimental observations. Such magnetically induced polarization, though small, inherently involves a strong magnetoelectric coupling^{28}. We point out that Se is a weak topological insulator (TI), being a 2D array of 1D insulators with nontrivial topological invariant. This is reflected in an even number of band crossings at the Fermi energy (Fig. 5) in the electronic structure of the nonmagnetic state. As a result, its surface states are not as robust against disorder as those of a strong 3D TI. Finally, as the topological invariant of bulk Se is linked to its structure and forced by its symmetry, it can be considered a crystalline TI^{29}.
Origin of the magnetoelectric effect: spinchargephonon coupling
To understand the unusual Raman spectra observed by us, we now present an analysis of the phonons and their coupling with spin and electric field. Our theoretical estimates of the phonon frequencies of bulk Se (217 cm^{−1} for the E mode and 89 cm^{−1} for an IRactive A_{2} mode) are in reasonable agreement with observations (232 cm^{−1} and 82 cm^{−1}, respectively). The HellmanFeynman forces on Se atoms in the nonmagnetic state with atomic structure obtained by minimizing energy of the ferromagnetic state give the lowest order spinphonon coupling. Projecting these onto the phonon eigenvectors, we establish that the Ramanactive E mode at 217 cm^{−1} exhibits the largest spinphonon coupling and the lower energy E mode at 128 cm^{−1} shows noticeable coupling with spin. This spinphonon coupling is responsible for the concurrent anomalies in magnon and phonon modes seen in the Raman spectra near the magnetic ordering temperature. A weak structural distortion (implied by the appearance of a low intensity Raman A_{1} mode at low temperatures, see Fig. 3) at the magnetic/ferroelectric transition can be also ascribed to the spinphonon coupling. Though the three Se atoms in the trigonal crystal cell are symmetry equivalent and homopolar, an external electric field does couple to its lattice (phonons) due its nontrivial symmetry (see Table I). The tensorial character of the coupling of electric field with the atomic displacements (Born dynamical charges) permits a nonzero charge Z for Se atoms positioned on the xaxis, with the electric field also along xaxis, e.g., (Z)_{xx} = 0.70.
Having established the coupling of phonons with spin and electric field based on experimental and firstprinciples theoretical evidence, we express free energy of Se surface as a function of spin (S), phonon coordinate (u) and electric field (E), using a Landaulike theory: , where K = μω^{2} is the phonon spring constant, Z is the dynamical charge, L is the spinphonon coupling and J, the exchange coupling. Minimizing energy with respect to u, we obtain the effective free energy: , where the three terms are, respectively, the phonon contribution to the dielectric constant, the phononrenormalized exchange coupling and the phononmediated linear magnetoelectric coupling. We note that magnon frequency is determined by the effective exchange coupling.
Since this linear theory does not explain the electric field dependence of magnon frequency (a third order effect), we consider the third order coupling of a phonon with the electric field: H = αu^{2}E, with . We determine α by distorting the structure with the atomic displacements (u) by ≈1% of the lattice constant and estimating the Born dynamical charges of phonons using DFT linear response. Interestingly, lower energy modes exhibit the strongest third order coupling with electric field, while α of the Ramanactive E mode is relatively much weaker (see Table I), which explains the observed independence of the E mode on electric field. The exchange coupling, renormalized by lower energy modes, can be shown to change with electric field as: . In this model, the observed dependence of magnon frequency on electric field originates from the third order phononelectric field and linear spinphonon couplings. Similarly, dielectric constant varies linearly with magnetic field and the magnetocapacitance is proportional to:
Discussion
We have established the existence of ferromagnetic order in Se microrods below ≈40 K from bulk magnetization and magnon scattering data. Ferroelectric order in a similar temperature range is indicated by a peak in the dielectric response near T_{C}, reversible spontaneous polarization (evidenced by pyroelectric response on field reversal), and ferroelectric hysteresis, with a clear tendency towards saturation. We point out that the possible existence of piezoelectricity with fairly high electromechanical coupling had already been suggested some time back^{30}. Magnetoelectric coupling is clearly indicated by our data on the magnetic field dependence of the dielectric response and the electrical field dependence of the magnon mode frequencies.
While the possibility of magnetoelectric coupling at the surface of magnetic metals has recently been pointed out^{31}, the emergence of multiferroic behavior in a nonmagnetic, elemental semiconductor is certainly quite astonishing. Indeed, ferroelectricity and magnetism are neither expected, nor observed in bulk Se. Our work suggests that the chiral arrangement of Se atoms leads to a coupling between the lattice and electric field, while the spinpolarized surface arises from its unique electronic structure with nontrivial topology, reflected in a Berry phase of π. This highly unusual coupling of its lattice with the electric field, surface spins or magnetic excitations allows elemental Se to acquire multiferroic properties, observable only in lowdimensional samples. The surface origin of the phenomenon necessarily implies that the volumenormalized polarization and magnetization do not appear very large. Interestingly, the multiferroic transition appears to be associated with the nucleation of a small fraction of the αmonoclinic phase (in which the Se atoms are arranged in 8member rings, rather than long chains), that increases with decreasing temperature below T_{C}. We suggest that dispersed nuclei of this minority phase effectively break up the infinite 1D chains of the majority trigonal phase into shorter lengths, thus maximizing their number, but not affecting the overall crystalline order. This model also explains the history dependence, e.g., in the pyroelectric data, since cooling the sample below T_{C} would each time produce a different realization of the geometric arrangement of the short chains. Significantly, our work uncovers a new route to multiferroic behavior that is not strongly restricted by symmetry, and indicates that similar magnetoelectric surface properties could well emerge in other semiconductors with lowsymmetry chiral space group. At the same time, our observations provide strong experimental support to the recent theoretical investigations that propose electronic topology as a novel origin of magnetoelectric coupling.
Methods
Magnetic measurements were made in a Quantum Design SQUID magnetometer. Raman spectra were recorded in the backscattering geometry with incident polarization parallel to the microrod axis, using a JobinYvon T64000 triple grating spectrometer with a Kr laser 647.1 nm excitation. Dielectric (capacitance) measurements were carried out in a He cryostat (uniformly illuminated through an optical window) by placing the Se microtubes on a 10 mm × 8 mm Sapphire substrate. Ferroelectric hysteresis measurements were made by sandwiching the microtubes between two 6 mm diameter copper plates specially customized for low temperature measurements. In both cases, contacts were made with low temperature Silver paste. Firstprinciples calculations were based on density functional theory (DFT) as implemented in the Quantum ESPRESSO^{32} package with spindensity dependent generalised gradient approximation (GGA) to exchangecorrelation function (Perdew, Burke and Ernzerhof^{33}) and ultrasoft pseudopotentials^{27} to represent the interaction between ionic cores and valence electrons. Spin polarized calculations were performed using the GGA + U method^{34} with U = 1 eV to 5 eV. Electric polarization was determined using the Berry's phase approach^{35}. Occupation numbers were smeared using a FermiDirac scheme with a broadening of 0.005 Ry. For GGA calculations, KohnSham wavefunctions were represented with a plane wave basis with an energy cutoff of 50 Ry and kinetic energy cutoff for charge density of 400 Ry. Integration over the Brillouin zone was carried out using the MonkhorstPack scheme with regular 5 × 5 × 5 and 6 × 6 × 1 meshes of kpoints for bulk and slab calculations, respectively. Some of the subtle results (e.g., Berry phase polarization) were reproduced with LDA^{36}, and HGH pseudopotentials^{37} and energy cutoff of 70 Ry using ABINIT package^{38,39}.
References
 1.
Wang, K. F., Liu, J.M. & Ren, Z. F. Multiferroicity: the coupling between magnetic and polarization orders. Adv. Phys. 58, 321–448 (2009).
 2.
Eerenstein, W., Mathur, N. D. & Scott, J. F. Multiferroic and magnetoelectric materials. Nature 442, 759–765 (2006).
 3.
Ramesh, R. & Spaldin, N. A. Multiferroics: progress and prospects in thin films. Nature Materials 6, 21–29 (2007).
 4.
Prellier, W., Singh, M. P. & Murugavel, P. The singlephase multiferroic oxides: from bulk to thin film. J. Phys. Con. Mat. 17, R803–832 (2005).
 5.
Zheng, H. et al. Multiferroic BaTiO_{3}CoFe_{2}O_{4} nanostructures. Science 303, 661–663 (2004).
 6.
Fiebig, M. Revival of the magnetoelectric effect. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 38, R123–R152 (2005).
 7.
Nan, C. W., Bichurin, M. I., Dong, S. X., Viehland, D. & Srinivasan, G. Multiferroic magnetoelectric composites: Historical perspective, status, and future directions. J. Appl. Phys. 103, 031101 (2008).
 8.
Hill, N. A. Why are there so few magnetic ferroelectrics? J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 6694–6709 (2000).
 9.
Catalan, G. & Scott, J. F. Physics and Applications of Bismuth Ferrite. Adv. Mater. 21, 2463–2485 (2009).
 10.
Neaton, J. B., Ederer, C., Waghmare, U. V., Spaldin, N. A. & Rabe, K. M. Firstprinciples study of spontaneous polarization in multiferroic BiFeO_{3}. Phys. Rev. B 71, 014113 (2005).
 11.
Kimura, T. et al. Magnetic control of ferroelectric polarization. Nature 426, 55–58 (2003).
 12.
Hur, N. et al. Electric polarization reversal and memory in a multiferroic material induced by magnetic fields. Nature 429, 392–395 (2004).
 13.
Cheong, S.W. & Mostovoy, M. Multiferroics: a magnetic twist for ferroelectricity. Nature Materials 6, 13–20 (2007).
 14.
Tokura, Y. & Seki, S. Multiferroics with Spiral Spin Orders. Adv. Mater. 22, 1554–1565 (2010).
 15.
Qi, X.L., Hughes, T. L. & Zhang, S.C. Topological field theory of timereversal invariant insulators. Phys. Rev. B 78, 195424 (2008).
 16.
Essin, A. M. Moore, J. E. & Vanderbilt, D. Magnetoelectric Polarizability and Axion Electrodynamics in Crystalline Insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 146805 (2009).
 17.
Pearson, G. L. & Brattain, W. H. History of Semiconductor Research, Proc. IRE 43, 1794–1806 (1955).
 18.
Dharmatti, S. S. Anomalous Diamagnetism of Selenium. Nature 134, 497 (1934).
 19.
Kahaly, M. U., Ghosh, P., Narasimhan, S. & Waghmare, U. V. Size dependence of structural, electronic, elastic, and optical properties of selenium nanowires: A firstprinciples study. J. Chem. Phys. 128, 044718 (2008).
 20.
Lucovsky, G., Mooradian, A., Taylor, W., Wright, G. B. & Keezer, R. C. Identification of the fundamental vibrational modes of trigonal, αmonoclinic and amorphous Selenium. Solid State Comm. 5, 113–117 (1967).
 21.
McCann, D. R. & Cartz, L. Bond distances and chain angle of hexagonal selenium at high pressure. J. Appl. Phys. 43, 4473–4477 (1972).
 22.
Fischer, R. Absorption and electroabsorption of trigonal Selenium near the fundamental absorption edge. Phys. Rev. B 5, 3087–3094 (1972).
 23.
Abdullaev, G. B., Asadov, Y. G. & Mamedov, K. P. in The Physics of Selenium and Tellurium edited by Cooper, W. C. (Pergamon, Oxford, 1969) p. 188.
 24.
Yazyev, O. V. Emergence of magnetism in graphene materials and nanostructures. Rep. Prog. Phys. 73, 056501 (2010).
 25.
Hasan, M. Z. & Moore, J. E. ThreeDimensional Topological Insulators,. in Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, Vol 2 (ed Langer, J. S.) 55–78 (Annual Reviews, 2011).
 26.
Soluyanov, A. A. & Vanderbilt, D. Computing topological invariants without inversion symmetry. Phys. Rev. B 83, 235401 (2011).
 27.
Vanderbilt, D. Soft selfconsistent pseudopotentials in a generalized eigenvalue formalism. Phys. Rev. B 41, 7892–7895 (1990).
 28.
Mostovoy, M. Ferroelectricity in Spiral Magnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 067601 (2006).
 29.
Fu, L. Topological Crystalline Insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 106802 (2011).
 30.
Dieulesaint, E. & Royer, D. Properties of piezoelectric Selenium and Selenium layers. Ferroelectrics 42, 187–195 (1982).
 31.
Gerhard, L. Magnetoelectric coupling at metal surfaces. Nature Nanotechnology 5, 792–797 (2010).
 32.
Giannozzi, P. et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and opensource software project for quantum simulations of materials. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21, 395502 (2009).
 33.
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).
 34.
Cococcioni, M. & de Gironcoli, S. Linear response approach to the calculation of the effective interaction parameters in the LDA + U method. Phys. Rev. B 71, 035105 (2005).
 35.
KingSmith, R. D. & Vanderbilt, D. Theory of polarization of crystalline solids. Phys. Rev. B 47, 1651–1654 (1993).
 36.
Kohn, W. & Sham, L. J. SelfConsistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects. Phys. Rev. 140, A1133–A1138 (1965).
 37.
Hartwigsen, C., Goedecker, S. & Hutter, J. Relativistic separable dualspace Gaussian pseudopotentials from H to Rn. Phys. Rev. B 58, 3641–3662 (1998).
 38.
Gonze, X. et al. Firstprinciples computation of material properties: the ABINIT software project. Computational Materials Science 25, 478–492 (2002).
 39.
Goedecker, S. Fast radix 2, 3, 4, and 5 kernels for fast Fourier transformations on computers with overlapping MultiplyAdd Instructions. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 18, 1605–1611 (1997).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge Dr. A. Thamizhavel for useful suggestions regarding crystal growth, Dr. A. V. Gopal and Dr. M. Deshmukh for providing access to certain experimental facilities and Dr. S. B. Roy (RRCAT, Indore) for discussions. We thank Ms. B. Chalke and Mr. N. Kulkarni for their help with the electron microscopy and Xray diffraction measurements, respectively.
Author information
Affiliations
Department of Condensed Matter Physics & Materials Science, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai 400005, India
 Anirban Pal
 , Smita Gohil
 , Shankar Ghosh
 & Pushan Ayyub
Theoretical Sciences Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bangalore 560064, India
 Sharmila N. Shirodkar
 & Umesh V. Waghmare
Authors
Search for Anirban Pal in:
Search for Sharmila N. Shirodkar in:
Search for Smita Gohil in:
Search for Shankar Ghosh in:
Search for Umesh V. Waghmare in:
Search for Pushan Ayyub in:
Contributions
A.P. carried out the experiments and analysed the data, S. Gohil participated in the Raman experiments; S.N.S. and U.V.W. carried out the theoretical calculations and analysis; S. Ghosh and P.A. planned the study; P.A. and U.V.W. wrote the paper with inputs from S. Ghosh and S.N.S.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Pushan Ayyub.
Supplementary information
PDF files
 1.
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercialNoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/byncnd/3.0/
To obtain permission to reuse content from this article visit RightsLink.
About this article
Further reading

1.
How different are Te clusters—a firstprinciples study
Journal of Nanoparticle Research (2018)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.