Article | Open | Published:

Controlling the quantum dynamics of a mesoscopic spin bath in diamond

Scientific Reports volume 2, Article number: 382 (2012) | Download Citation

Abstract

Understanding and mitigating decoherence is a key challenge for quantum science and technology. The main source of decoherence for solid-state spin systems is the uncontrolled spin bath environment. Here, we demonstrate quantum control of a mesoscopic spin bath in diamond at room temperature that is composed of electron spins of substitutional nitrogen impurities. The resulting spin bath dynamics are probed using a single nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centre electron spin as a magnetic field sensor. We exploit the spin bath control to dynamically suppress dephasing of the NV spin by the spin bath. Furthermore, by combining spin bath control with dynamical decoupling, we directly measure the coherence and temporal correlations of different groups of bath spins. These results uncover a new arena for fundamental studies on decoherence and enable novel avenues for spin-based magnetometry and quantum information processing.

Introduction

In the past few years, new advances in quantum science and technology have underscored the importance of understanding and controlling decoherence of single solid-state spins1,2,3. Decoherence of a single central spin in contact with a spin bath environment has been intensively studied in various systems such as quantum dots4,5,6,7, donors in silicon8 and defects in diamond9,10,11,12 through control and readout of the central spin. Here, we implement quantum control of both the central spin and its spin bath environment, thereby enabling a range of new experiments on the fundamentals of decoherence. Moreover, spin bath control is a crucial ingredient of recent proposals for environment-assisted magnetometry13, room-temperature quantum computing using spins in diamond14,15 and spin squeezing16.

Our study focuses on the electronic spin bath environment formed by nitrogen impurities surrounding a single NV centre in diamond (Fig 1a). The electron spin of the NV centre can be initialized and read out optically, and coherently controlled with high fidelity at room temperature using microwave magnetic pulses17,18,19. For controlling the quantum state of the bath spins, we apply short (tens-of-nanoseconds) radiofrequency (RF) pulses to the sample. The high intensity control fields that allow fast control of both the central NV spin and the bath spins are delivered through a broadband coplanar waveguide (CPW) fabricated on the diamond substrate.

Figure 1: Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of a spin bath using a single spin sensor.
Figure 1

(a) Schematic of the system: a single NV centre electronic spin (S = 1) is surrounded by a bath of electron spins (S = 1/2) belonging to substitutional N impurities. The applied external magnetic field B is aligned with the symmetry axis of the NV centre, which is oriented along the [111] crystallographic direction. Nitrogen impurities exhibit a static Jahn-Teller distortion, which results in an elongation of one of the four N-C bonds. As a result, the defect has a symmetry axis, also called the Jahn-Teller axis (indicated red), which is oriented along randomly along one of the crystallographic axes. There are therefore two geometric types of bath spins which are distinguished by their orientation of the Jahn-Teller axis relative to the external field B: those that have their JT axis at an angle α = 0°, and those with α = 109.5°. (b) Measurement sequence for spin bath spectroscopy. A spin echo sequence is applied to the NV spin using MW pulses; the bath spins are controlled by RF pulses. The evolution of the NV spin during the sequence is sketched in the Bloch spheres at the bottom, both for the case of no spin bath control (solid line), and for the case of spin bath control applied (dashed line) (see Supplementary information for details). (c) Upper panel: Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the spin bath. A magnetic field of 132 G is applied along the NV centre symmetry axis. Roman numbers label the different groups of N electron bath spins, according to their nuclear spin projections mI and angle α between their Jahn-Teller axis and the external magnetic field: I,V: mI = ±1 and α = 0°, II,IV: mI = ±1 and α = 109.5°, III: mI = 0 and α = 0° or 109.5°. Lower panel: Calculation of the spectrum (see Supplementary information).

The state of the (optically inactive) spin bath can in principle be monitored directly via the emitted RF radiation as in conventional electron spin resonance. However, this method requires many orders of magnitude more spins than contained in our mesoscopic region of interest, and is limited to high magnetic fields. Instead, we exploit the coupling of the bath spins to the single NV centre. The near-atomic size of the NV centre, combined with the strong (1/r3) distance dependence of the dipolar coupling to the surrounding bath spins, renders the NV spin mainly sensitive to a small number N (a few tens) of bath spins. This local spin bath exhibits a large statistical polarization (1/√N) that is felt by the NV centre as a magnetic dipolar field δb. The spin bath polarization and the corresponding value of the bath field δb change in time due to flip-flop processes within the bath, leading to dephasing of the NV centre spin on a timescale of about 300 ns19. This quasi-static dephasing is compensated in a spin echo sequence with a refocusing π-pulse (Fig 1b), yielding decay on a much longer timescale T2,NV = (2.6 ±0.1) μs19. However, if we induce changes in the state of the bath spins (thus changing the value of δb) by applying a high intensity RF pulse halfway the NV spin echo sequence, the refocusing is ineffective and the NV spin echo amplitude is reduced (Fig 1b). Therefore, by incorporating the spin bath control within a spin echo sequence of the NV centre the resulting spin bath dynamics can be probed.

Results

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of bath spins

To identify the environmental spins we perform magnetic resonance spectroscopy by sweeping the frequency of applied RF pulses while monitoring the NV spin echo amplitude (upper panel of Fig 1c). Several sharp dips are observed, demonstrating that spins in the environment are being rotated at these specific frequencies. The obtained spectrum matches that of single electron spins (S = 1/2) belonging to substitutional nitrogen (N) impurities20. We find excellent agreement with a theoretical spectrum (lower panel Fig. 1c) calculated using known values for the Zeeman energy and hyperfine interaction with the N nuclear spin, which is anisotropic due to a static Jahn-Teller distortion (Fig. 1a). Since the resonance frequencies are spaced by several line widths, only spins that belong to the same spectral group can exchange energy via flip-flop processes. The spin environment of the NV centre can therefore be decomposed into different spectral groups of electron spins (labelled I to V) that are distinguished by their hyperfine interaction with the host N nuclear spin.

With the resonance frequencies known, we can coherently control the spin environment. Fig. 2a shows the effect of short RF pulses at the resonance frequency of group II spins. Periodic revivals in the NV spin echo amplitude are observed as a function of RF pulse length, with a frequency that increases with RF pulse amplitude. This behaviour is the key signature of coherently driven (“Rabi”) oscillations, demonstrating that we have achieved quantum control of the spin environment. We note that the NV spin echo revives almost completely whenever the bath spins are rotated by a multiple of 2π, indicating that the environment has returned to the state it had before the RF pulse. We can control all other spin bath groups in a similar manner (Fig. 2b). In addition, our setup allows us to rotate several or all the groups simultaneously with multi-frequency control pulses.

Figure 2: Coherent control of the spin bath.
Figure 2

(a) Coherent driven oscillations of group II bath spins, using RF pulses of 298 MHz. Revivals in NV echo amplitude are observed whenever the bath spins from group II perform a 2π rotation. The maximum Rabi frequency extracted from fitting the upper trace at 20 dBm source power is f1 = (20.5 ± 0.1) MHz. (b) Independent coherent control of each group of bath spins. Solid lines are fits to with t the length of the RF pulse (see Supplementary information).

Spin echo double resonance (SEDOR)

The ability to control both the NV centre spin and its spin bath environment opens up a range of new possible experiments aimed at studying and manipulating the coupling between a central spin and a spin bath as well as investigating the internal bath dynamics. We first apply the bath control to measure the coupling of each of the bath spin groups to the NV centre spin using a spin echo double resonance (SEDOR) scheme21 (Fig. 3a). With this scheme the dephasing of the central spin induced by one particular group of bath spins can be probed, while the effect of all other dephasing channels (including other spin bath groups) is refocused. We find that, whereas the NV spin echo amplitude decays as , the SEDOR scheme yields a faster, Gaussian-shaped decay (see Fig. 3a). The Gaussian shape indicates that the decay observed with SEDOR is dominated by the quasi-static static dephasing channel that we have selectively turned on. Therefore, the SEDOR decay time directly yields the r.m.s. interaction strength bi between the NV spin and the ith spin bath group via. We find bI = (0.83±0.02) μs−1, bII = (1.59±0.03) μs−1, bIII = (1.58±0.04) μs−1 , bIV = (1.63±0.04) μs−1 and bV = (0.80±0.02) μs−1 (see Supplementary Fig. 1). These values are close to the ratio of expected from the abundance of each spectral group20, except for the slightly lower value for group III. This group is actually composed of two subgroups which spectrally do not coincide perfectly. The control fidelity is therefore lower for this group which results in a lower measured coupling in the SEDOR experiment.

Figure 3: Control of NV spin coherence by spin bath manipulation.
Figure 3

(a) Spin echo double resonance (SEDOR) experiment. The RF pulses have been calibrated to rotate a preselected group of bath spins over a π angle. The NV spin echo curve is fit to , SEDOR curves are fit to (see Supplementary information). (b) Dynamical suppression of NV centre spin dephasing through spin bath control. Free evolution of the NV spin is shown with (blue) and without (red) RF π-pulse applied to the bath spins. Solid lines are fits that include the detuning () of the MW driving field compared to the NV spin splitting, and local hyperfine interaction of 2.2 MHz with the host nuclear N spin. This hyperfine interaction is responsible for the observed beating pattern (see Supplementary information). The overall signal decays with a Gaussian envelope, with decay constant in the absence of the spin bath control (red) and with decay constant in the case where the bath control pulses are applied (blue).

The r.m.s. field fluctuations generated by the full electron spin bath are given by . This value falls short of the measured total dephasing rate of btotal = (3.6 ± 0.1) μs−1 (see Supplementary Fig. 2a), suggesting the presence of additional dephasing channels, such as the carbon-13 nuclear spins9,10 and magnetic field drifts, with a strength of . This interpretation is supported by independent measurements on an NV centre in a pure diamond sample with low nitrogen content under the same experimental conditions that yield bexcess = (2.06 ± 0.04) μs−1 (see Supplementary Fig. 2b) .

For applications in quantum information processing1 and spin-based dc-magnetometry2,3, suppressing dephasing is crucial. We now demonstrate that quantum control of the spin bath can be used to eliminate the effect of the spin bath on the free evolution dynamics of the NV centre spin (see Fig. 3b). By flipping all bath spins, the interaction between the NV centre and bath spins can be time-averaged to zero. This procedure is akin to dynamical decoupling as recently demonstrated on single NV centre spins19,22,23, but has the advantage that no control pulses on the NV centre itself are required. We find that a refocusing π-pulse applied simultaneously to all bath spins (Fig. 3b) increases up to the limit set by bexcess, indicating that dephasing by the electron spin bath is suppressed. Similar enhancement is achieved by continuous driving of all bath spins (see Supplementary Fig. 2a).

Coherence and temporal correlations of bath spins

By combining the spin bath control with the ability to freeze the evolution of the NV spin by dynamical decoupling19,22,23, coherence and temporal correlations during free evolution within the spin bath can be directly probed. We replace the single refocusing pulse of the spin echo sequence on the NV spin by a dynamical decoupling (DD) sequence with a net π-rotation (see Supplementary information). The DD sequence provides a means to temporarily turn off our sensor (the NV centre) as it is made insensitive to the magnetic environment for the duration of the DD sequence; the net π-rotation ensures that the refocusing action of the sequence is preserved. The two periods of free evolution τs of the NV spin now serve as sensing stages which each sample the dipolar field generated by the bath spins. The NV echo amplitude is therefore a measure of the correlation between the dipolar fields measured during the two sensing stages. While the sensor is switched off, we can apply multi-pulse RF sequences to individual spectral groups of bath spins to study their coherence during free evolution. An RF Ramsey sequence (Fig. 4a) and Hahn-echo sequence (Fig. 4b) is applied to spectral group i to measure its spin dephasing time and coherence time respectively. Data is shown for spectral groups I and II.

Figure 4: Coherent dynamics and temporal correlations of the spin bath.
Figure 4

(a) Measurement of decay during free evolution of spin bath groups I and II. The two sensing stages marked by τs serve to sample the magnetic environment before and after the Ramsey sequence is applied to the bath spins. The NV spin sensor is turned off while the RF Ramsey sequence is applied to the bath spins (see main text for details). Instead of detuning the RF pulse field with respect to the transition to observe fringes, an artificial detuning fa is introduced by changing the phase of the final RF π/2-pulse linearly with pulse separation . Solid lines are fits to (see Supplementary information for details). Additional contributions resulting from the off-resonant driving of spins from the nearest neighbouring group is taken into account by an extra oscillating term with frequency , which is given by the detuning of this group with respect to the pulse carrier. The fast modulation of Ramsey fringes for group I (upper panel) result from off-resonant driving of the more abundant spins from group II (). From the fits we extract the decay constants and . (b) Spin echo on spin bath groups I and II. The phase of the final RF π/2-pulse is changed as a function of total free evolution time τ as with fa = 10 MHz, resulting in oscillations in the NV spin echo amplitude with free evolution time τ. Solid lines are fits to from which the decay times T2,I = (1.9 ± 0.6) µs and T2,II = (0.89 ± 0.13) µs are extracted (see Supplementary information). (c) Measurement of temporal correlations on the full environment and on spin bath group II alone. During the sensing stages marked by, MW and RF π-pulses can be applied simultaneously to the NV spin and to the bath spins to selectively measure the correlation time of a particular group of bath spins. Solid lines are fits to (see Supplementary information).

The values we find for are similar for the two groups as expected, since all bath spins suffer from the same dephasing channels formed by spins from all groups. From the value of we estimate the local density of bath spins to be about 100 parts per million (see Supplementary information).

The bath spin-echo sequence yields different decay times, T2,I = (1.9 ± 0.6) μs and T2,II = (0.89 ± 0.13) μs, for spectral groups I and II. The difference in coherence times between different spectral groups may arise due to dephasing caused spins within the same group, in a process which is known as instantaneous diffusion24,25. The RF π-pulse does not refocus the dipolar interactions between spins of the same spectral group since these spins are themselves rotated by the RF π-pulse. The resulting intra-group dephasing is much stronger in group II because it contains three times more spins than group I.

To characterize the temporal correlations resulting from the dynamics in the environment we perform a direct measurement of the auto-correlation function and its 1/e decay time τC (see Supplementary information). The field generated by the complete magnetic environment is sampled during two sensing stages separated by a variable waiting time during which we turn off the NV centre sensor (Fig. 4c) and let the spin bath evolve freely26. As the sensor off-time is increased, the initial correlation between the two fields is gradually lost resulting in decreasing NV echo amplitude. We observe a decay of the auto-correlation function on a timescale of about 20 µs.

We can also find the correlation time of an individual spin bath group by inserting a SEDOR sequence in the sensing stage, as demonstrated for group II (Fig. 4c). The measured correlation time of group II is comparable to that of the complete magnetic environment, indicating that the coherence time of the NV centre is indeed limited by the dynamics of the electron spin bath. The measured correlation time is comparable to the value μs expected from mean-field theory19,24.

Discussion

In conclusion, we have demonstrated full quantum control of a spin bath surrounding a single NV centre. These results pave the way for a new class of experiments on spin bath decoherence, such as manipulating the correlation time of different spin bath groups and generating squeezed spin bath states16. Furthermore, the suppression of spin dephasing by spin-bath control may be exploited for protecting coherence in spin-based quantum technologies1,2,3,14,27,28. Finally, quantum control of nitrogen electron spins close to NV centres as demonstrated here enables implementation of quantum registers of individual N electron spins29,30, scalable coupling of NV centre quantum bits via spin chains15 and ultra-sensitive environment-assisted magnetometry13.

Methods

Device and setup

The diamond sample is a single crystal type Ib plate from Element Six, with a Nitrogen concentration specified to be below 200 parts-per-million. A high-bandwidth golden coplanar waveguide (CPW) structure for magnetic resonance is fabricated by electron beam lithography directly on top of the bulk diamond sample. A static magnetic field of 132 G aligned along the symmetry axis of the NV centre is generated by a custom-built four-coil vector magnet setup (Alpha Magnetics). Spin-dependent fluorescence of the NV-centre is detected using a home-built confocal microscope. To determine that the detected fluorescence originated from a single NV centre, we performed a measurement of the second-order intensity autocorrelation function to verify that the antibunching dip reached a value well below . Spin initialization and readout is achieved by 600 ns laser (532 nm) pulses. The timings of all microwave, radiofrequency and laser pulses are controlled by a 4-channel arbitrary waveform generator (Tektronix AWG5014). Each experiment is repeated for 2 M times to achieve statistical noise levels of order 1%. All experiments are performed at room temperature.

Phase and frequency control of MW and RF pulses is provided by IQ modulation using two vector sources (R&S SMBV 100A) with carrier set to 2.5 GHz and 400 MHz to control the NV spin and bath spins respectively. I and Q inputs of each vector source are controlled by two analogue channels of the AWG. Single and multi-frequency pulses on the RF channel are generated by proper IQ mixing to achieve image-frequency rejection. The modulated MW and RF signals are fed to two high power amplifiers (Amplifier Research 25S1G4 and 30W1000B respectively). After amplification the MW and RF signals are combined and delivered to the on-chip CPW. RF field inhomogeneities are <1% over the relevant length scales (10 nm) and therefore do not limit the control fidelity of the bath pulses.

Spin bath description

Substitutional Nitrogen impurities in diamond (also called P1 centres in literature) exhibit trigonal symmetry due to a static Jahn-Teller distortion in which one of the four N-C bonds is elongated. Most of the electron density is concentrated at the antibonding orbital belonging to this elongated N-C bond20,31. The close proximity of and partial overlap between the electron wavefunction and the N nucleus, combined with the trigonal symmetry, gives rise to a strong anisotropic hyperfine interaction between the defect's electronic spin (S = 1/2) and the host N nuclear spin (I = 1). The internal Hamiltonian of a nitrogen impurity in diamond is given by with A// = 114 MHz, MHz and P = 4.2 MHz and and are the operators for the electron and nuclear spin respectively of the nitrogen impurity20. The direction of the z-axis is set by the JT distortion axis and is therefore oriented along one of the four N-C bonds20. The outer two satellites (belonging to group I and V) in the spectrum of Fig. 1c result from nitrogen impurities which have a JT axis oriented along the externally applied field.

Both the reorientation of the JT axis32 and the nuclear spin-flips of the nitrogen impurities occur on timescales ranging from milliseconds to seconds. This is much shorter than the time required to build up statistics (tens of minutes per data point) but much longer than the time it takes to perform a single experimental run (several microseconds). These processes can therefore be treated as being quasi-static within one run, while at the same time we are averaging in the complete experiment over the full thermal distribution of all nuclear spin projections and JT orientations. Also, the differences in local configurations of N impurities around different NV centres will change the and parameters of the NV spin, but not the relevant ensemble properties of the spin bath33.

References

  1. 1.

    et al. Quantum computers. Nature 464, 45–53 (2010).

  2. 2.

    Scanning magnetic field microscope with a diamond single-spin sensor. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 243111 (2008).

  3. 3.

    et al. High-sensitivity diamond magnetometer with nanoscale resolution. Nature Phys. 4, 810 (2008).

  4. 4.

    et al. Dephasing time of GaAs electron-spin qubits coupled to a nuclear bath exceeding 200 μs. Nature Phys. 7, 109–113 (2011).

  5. 5.

    et al. Electron-nuclear interaction in 13C nanotube double quantum dots. Nature Phys. 5, 321–326 (2009).

  6. 6.

    et al. Locking electron spins into magnetic resonance by electron–nuclear feedback. Nature Phys. 5, 764–768 (2009).

  7. 7.

    et al. Confluence of resonant laser excitation and bidirectional quantum-dot nuclear-spin polarization. Nature Phys. 5, 758–763 (2009).

  8. 8.

    et al. Single-shot readout of an electron spin in silicon. Nature 467, 687–691 (2010).

  9. 9.

    et al. Coherent dynamics of coupled electron and nuclear spin qubits in diamond. Science 314, 281–285 (2006).

  10. 10.

    et al. Coherence of single spins coupled to a nuclear spin bath of varying density. Phys. Rev. B 80, 041201 (2008).

  11. 11.

    , , , & Coherent dynamics of a single spin interacting with an adjustable spin bath. Science 320, 352–355 (2008).

  12. 12.

    et al. Ultralong spin coherence time in isotopically engineered diamond. Nature Mat. 8, 383–387 (2009).

  13. 13.

    et al. Environment assisted precision measurement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 140502 (2011).

  14. 14.

    et al. Scalable architecture for a room temperature solid-state quantum processor. arXiv:1012.2864v1 (2011).

  15. 15.

    , & Coherent state transfer via highly mixed quantum spin chains. Phys. Rev. A 83, 032304 (2011).

  16. 16.

    , M .K., Vuletic, V. & Levitov, L. S. Generating entanglement and squeezed states of nuclear spins in quantum dots. arXiv:1101.3370v2 (2011).

  17. 17.

    , , , & Gigahertz dynamics of a strongly driven single quantum spin. Science 326, 1520–1522 (2009).

  18. 18.

    & Single defect centers in diamond: A review. Phys. Stat. Sol. 203, 3207–3225 (2006).

  19. 19.

    , , , & Universal dynamical decoupling of a single solid state spins from a spin bath. Science 330, 60–63 (2010).

  20. 20.

    , , & Electron-spin resonance of nitrogen donors in diamond. Phys. Rev. 115, 1546–1553 (1959).

  21. 21.

    Principles of Magnetic Resonance (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990).

  22. 22.

    , & Robust decoupling techniques to extend quantum coherence in diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 200402 (2010).

  23. 23.

    et al. Dynamical decoupling of a single-electron spin at room temperature. Phys. Rev. B 83, 081201 (2011).

  24. 24.

    & Spectral diffusion decay in spin resonance experiments. Phys. Rev. 125, 912–932 (1962).

  25. 25.

    , , & Electron spin relaxation times of phosphorus donors in silicon. Phys. Rev. B 68, 193207 (2003).

  26. 26.

    , , & The diamond Nitrogen-Vacancy center as a probe of random fluctuations in a nuclear spin ensemble. arXiv:1104.2546v1 (2011).

  27. 27.

    , , & Bias-voltage control of reversible nuclear spin polarization in double quantum dots. arXiv:1012.4545v2 (2011).

  28. 28.

    et al. Full coherent control of nuclear spins in an optically pumped single quantum dot. arXiv:1102.3636v1 (2011).

  29. 29.

    et al. Room-temperature coherent coupling of single spins in diamond. Nature Phys. 2, 408–413 (2006).

  30. 30.

    , , & Polarization and readout of coupled single spins in diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 087601 (2006).

  31. 31.

    & Electron spin resonance in the study of diamond. Rep. Prog. Phys. 41, 1201 (1978).

  32. 32.

    The Jahn-Teller effect and vibronic coupling at deep levels in diamond. Rep. Prog. Phys. 44, 787 (1981).

  33. 33.

    , , & Decoherence dynamics of a single spin versus spin ensemble. Phys. Rev. B 77, 245212 (2008).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank D. D. Awschalom, S. Frolov, G. D. Fuchs, K. Nowack, D. Ristè and L. M. K. Vandersypen for useful discussions. We gratefully acknowledge support from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the Dutch Organization for Fundamental Research on Matter (FOM), the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), and the European Union SOLID programme. Work at Ames Laboratory was supported by the Department of Energy—Basic Energy Sciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-07CH11358.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, P.O. Box 5046, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands

    • Gijs de Lange
    • , Toeno van der Sar
    • , Machiel Blok
    •  & Ronald Hanson
  2. Ames Laboratory and Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA

    • Zhi-Hui Wang
    •  & Viatcheslav Dobrovitski

Authors

  1. Search for Gijs de Lange in:

  2. Search for Toeno van der Sar in:

  3. Search for Machiel Blok in:

  4. Search for Zhi-Hui Wang in:

  5. Search for Viatcheslav Dobrovitski in:

  6. Search for Ronald Hanson in:

Contributions

G.d.L., T.v.d.S. and M.S.B. conducted the experiments, V.V.D. and Z.H.W. developed the theory. G.d.L. and R.H. wrote the paper. V.V.D. and R.H. supervised the project. All authors discussed the results, analysed the data and commented on the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Gijs de Lange or Ronald Hanson.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary information: Controlling the quantum dynamics of a mesoscopic spin bath in diamond

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00382

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.