Examines the factors that could affect how long botulinum toxin treatments work.
Discusses how botulinum toxins work on wrinkles, and their other uses.
Provides information the practitioner can use to educate their patients about how long their treatment should last.
Suggests that patient satisfaction with result and duration may improve with subsequent treatments.
Botulinum toxin is widely used in facial rhytide treatments. The duration of its effects influences treatment intervals, cost and convenience to the patient. These are key factors in successful aesthetic procedures. A review of the literature found that duration of effect was between two and six months, with most experiencing loss of maximal contraction for three to four months. Treatments may last between three to four months, and occasionally up to six months. No specific definition of effectiveness/efficacy has been described and used to measure comparable end points. Additional research should help clarify the impact of brand, age, gender, ethnicity, repetition of treatment and zinc-phytase supplementation.
The aim of this review article was to ascertain the duration of action of botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of glabellar frown lines1 in order to provide evidence-based advice to patients by ascertaining the average length of time a patient perceives their aesthetic botulinum toxin treatment lasts, and compare that to the published values.
The neurotoxin produced by the bacterium Clostridium botulinum, botulinum toxin, was first identified in 1897.2 It can produce muscle weakness or paralysis that has been exploited for treatments of muscle hyperactivity. It was first used by Dr Alan Scott to treat strabismus3 and subsequently prescribed for the treatment of muscle spasms in many other areas of the body. Scott concomitantly predicted other potential future applications, including a role in providing cosmetic enhancement.
The purified crystallised toxin serotype A (specifically Botox) was initially given FDA approval in 1989 for the treatment of involuntary muscle disorders such as strabismus.2 In 1993 Blitzer et al. described the use of the toxin for the management of 'hyper-functional lines of the face'; a cosmetic use was thus born.4 The latter worked by impeding the underlying muscle contraction causing relaxation and thus flattening of the overlying skin. Since then, its use in the treatment of rhytides (wrinkles) has spread considerably, with the global market forecast to hit $2.9 billion by 2018 according to Global Industry Analysts Inc.6 Indeed there has been a very large rise, with a spiralling increase in the number of patients seeking aesthetic treatments, with the market growing 6% in one year alone.7 A study by the UK Department of Health in 2013 estimated that 75% of the cosmetic market value in the UK is accounted for by botulinum toxin A and other non-surgical procedures.8
Owing to the dental origin of such aesthetic changes, the dental surgeon is ideally placed to diagnose and treat facial concerns; hence, there is a great overlap in these fields. As the dentist is trained in head and neck anatomy and performs injections regularly as part of their routine work it may follow that this procedure should become part of their practice. There are several well accepted techniques using botulinum toxin around the oral cavity, such as treatment of the 'gummy smile' or 'smoker's lines' in the upper lip. These are currently off-label uses for the toxin, and as such studies and clinical data are comparatively scarce. It is for this reason that this review focuses on the better studied, on-label, treatment of the glabellar region in order to achieve some homogeneity of studies compared.
In the UK, only three preparations of botulinum neurotoxin type A are licensed for the treatment of glabellar lines: OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox/Vistabel, Allergan), IncobotuliunumtoxinA (Bocouture/Xeomin, Merz) and AbobotulinumtoxinA (Azzalure/Dysport, Ipsen).9
The pharmacological effects of botulinum toxin
Neuromuscular transmission is usually achieved when the neurotransmitter acetylcholine is transported to presynaptic terminals (the nerve endings) in membrane vesicles which fuse with the cytoplasmic membrane leading to release of the neurotransmitter into the neuromuscular junction. (This is the process which administration of botulinum toxin blocks.) From here it diffuses across the synaptic gap to bind with the nicotinic cholinergic receptors on the postsynaptic membrane of the muscle surface.10 The effect of preventing neurotransmission at motor nerve endings is to temporarily denervate and hence relax the muscles local to the injection site.4
It is not yet known how the toxin is metabolised or otherwise eliminated from nerve endings.11 Indeed, there remain some considerable gaps in our knowledge of the mechanism for absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination of the toxin.12 However, it has been postulated that the toxin binds irreversibly to the synaptic nerve endings, and is then metabolised over the following months. It is likely that the protein degrades and is removed by the body and the pharmacological effects then cease.
There is no evidence of muscular atrophy following repeated botulinum toxin injections over long periods of time, but there have been incidences of resistance by antibody development. Certainly, with botulinum toxin treatments being so common, it follows that with greater numbers of treatments the number of incidents of immunity should rise. The latter has been reported to be rare; Kawashima and Harii found no incidence of antibody formation when testing the 363 subjects of their 2009 study.13 There is also no evidence of hypersensitivity developing. However, potential behavioural modification whereby the patient learns to avoid 'undesirable' facial movements may occur.4
The therapeutic scope of the toxin is quite varied (Box 1) Botulinum toxin has been used cosmetically since its cosmetic effects were documented in 1989. In facial aesthetic treatments the toxin works by causing weakening of the underlying muscle which exhibits habitual contraction, causing relaxation and thus flattening of the overlying skin.4 The use of botulinum toxin for treatment of facial rhytides is 'off-label' (an unlicensed but well accepted use) aside from glabellar lines and thus should be explained to the patient at point of consent.4
How the effects may be determined as ongoing
For ongoing effects to be assessed and measured, it is important to clarify what constitutes 'effective'. This is a very difficult question as the degree of effect varies, and the methods of assessing and measuring it are diverse.
Electromyographic (EMG) Guidance has been documented as an aid to locate where to inject the toxin. Although 'in neurologic indications EMG represents the gold standard for detection of muscular activity, the spatial resolution of this method probably limits its usefulness in aesthetic applications.'15 Studies have used a scoring system such as the Facial Wrinkle Score in order to assess the effect of toxin therapy. These are very subjective criteria and may vary between different assessors, and a disadvantage is they are subject to body dysmorphia if self-assessment is used.
Bhatnagar and co-workers16 have described the 'digital image speckle correlation' whereby skin detail such as the pores of the skin are used to map changes in skin surface overlying the muscles and thus 'track the degree of contraction' and associated skin displacement.
None of the methods investigated for measuring or quantifying longevity give a good standard, as there is no consensus on what is 'effective', nor a quantifiable, reproducible method by which to measure it. Only once 'effective' is defined can duration be assessed.
The patients' perceived outcomes are hugely important as this is what will contribute to patient satisfaction and as a result either repeat business or conversely, complaints. It is however subjective, and there may be many factors which influence the patients' self-reporting.17,18,19 As these elective treatments have a cosmetic, rather than a therapeutic value, the psychological health of a patient will hugely influence their perceived success as patients with body dysmorphic disorder do not typically benefit from cosmetic procedures.20
Among the studies included there were seven very different methods for assessing effective duration:
Patient perceived duration
Investigator-assessed wrinkle severity (by various subjective scales; FWS, GLSS)
Patient self-assessed wrinkle severity (as above)
Skin movement at maximal contraction
Improvement at repose
Length/depth of rhytide at maximal contraction compared to baseline
Ascher et al.21 used the time between first and second injection as their measure of duration. Repeat treatment intervals may be used to gauge how long a patient feels the treatment lasted satisfactorily. However, there are other factors: availability of clinics, cost of treatments, social factors around access to treatment such as time, distance, perceived healing time. The choice of outcome measures differs greatly; quantitative DISC and the more subjective assessment by both the plastic surgeon and the patient showed a clear correlation. However, the reappearance of muscle contraction (DISC) preceded the wrinkle appearance for patients by four to eight weeks, demonstrating that potentially the wrong measure was employed.17
Eight of the studies used patient assessment as at least one measure. This is relevant in a clinical setting, as the patient's perceived benefit would be a huge influence on their satisfaction and potential repeat business. It is however fraught with potential bias where the patient is aware of the desired outcome and also potentially the influence of cost and access where treatment intervals are concerned.
Dailey et al.22 used patient photographs which limited their population to lighter skin tones in order to be able to clearly image the rhytides. This variation in method obviously produces results that cannot be compared, that in the main-part measure something that although measurable, or subjectively quantifiable, is in truth not the effect that should be being considered for aesthetic purposes.
The durations of effects have been simplified by averaging out where possible, but it is important to note that in many cases the duration was deemed to go beyond the length of the study and as such these studies are a guide that effects are ongoing, but not a measure of the actual longevity.
It does not appear that there is an obvious pattern in assessment method and duration. Certainly, the patient perceived endpoint, which is weaker in terms of evidence has a shorter duration, so it may suggest that the longer durations are a better indicator (Fig. 1).
Factors that can affect the longevity of botulinum toxin treatment
There are many variables in treatments with botulinum toxin, both in the manner in which it is administered, and also the subject in which it is injected. If we know their effect, we may optimise results and give better advice.
Dose of toxin used, and its effect on longevity
Reduced dosages may result in unacceptably short durations.23 While a higher dose may be found to last longer, this must be weighed against higher doses potentially spreading to adjacent muscles with potentially adverse effects, and also the increased cost to the patient.
A study by Hankins et al.24 found there to be no significant difference in the longevity of effects from injection doses of 410 per site. Moreover, lower volumes used at a higher concentration were reported to be less uncomfortable, should have less spread, and thus be less likely to affect areas beyond the intended site.
Studies which test doses lower than recommended in the product information may be useful, as this may be common in practice, as they would be cheaper, and could also explain some poor treatment durations, and justify why clinicians should use the recommended doses.
Dose may not actually be comparable between products, and needs further investigation. Although there are conversions suggested between Speywood units, these vary in the literature, and may vary in different applications.
Where the durations are shown in order of dose, there is no clear pattern to suggest a good correlation. The doses are, however, mainly similar, and there are many other variables in the study designs. In addition, the doses are often altered to reflect for example the muscle mass, so higher doses may be being used in larger muscles.
Previous studies by Caruthers and co-workers25 and Lowe and co-workers26 reported that higher doses are more efficacious for longer in the applications they studied. This result was corroborated by Harii and Kawashima (2008)27 who found the mean duration rose from 7.9 weeks for 10 Units (U), to 9.4 weeks for 20 U. The study by Grimes et al. (2009)28 however suggests that 30 U is no more effective than 20 U in this small sample, so there may be an optimal dose. In fact Kane et al.29 found that as the dose increased, the percentage of responders decreased. However, it was suggested this was because those given larger doses were those with a greater muscle mass, and therefore were likely to be worse responders, so that this result was not directly related to the dose given. This would potentially impact on the gender results, as men tend to have greater muscle mass than women.
Licensed doses limit the study of the effect of dose on longevity, and so it is sensible that future research should include this in the study.
Area of treatment may impact treatment efficacy and duration. In a study by Blitzer et al. better results were found in the forehead than glabellar region (Fig. 1), however, this study concentrates on the glabellar alone.
Number of injection sites
Table 1 shows that most of the studies employed five injections sites (one mid-line in the procerus and two each side in the glabellar (see Fig. 2), in slightly different positions in some American studies) and there was no evidence to suggest the number of sites influences duration.
It has been found that zinc is required in the action of the light (50 kDa) chain. During translocation into the cytoplasm the light chain is denatured and the chelation site loses zinc, then having to regain another zinc from the cytosol's ambient pool.37 As a result recent studies suggest zinc may have an effect on the action of the toxin binding and hence potential implications on longevity. There was no mention of zinc as a variable in any of the papers reviewed; however, recent widespread press coverage26 has created interest from patients who wish to know if the addition of zinc is a viable method of increasing treatment longevity. According to the study by Koshy et al. (2012)38 92% of participants who received supplementary dietary zinc in combination with phytase supplements (phytase is believed to improve zinc absorption) had an increase in longevity. The level of evidence however is still poor as the patient sample receiving the zinc-phytase supplement marketed as 'Zytase' was relatively small38 and the author had a financial interest in the supplement. Therefore evidence is sparse and future research is needed in this area,39 especially as there is no scientific explanation why this effect should be found, nor is it known if those in the study were deficient in either zinc or phytase as suggested, such that the pool of zinc might have been sufficient without supplementation.
As can be seen in Table 1 almost all the research is based on trials of one brand; the end result of each is arguably only specific to that brand. This could be another variable on the longevity of effect in itself. Most of the research published has been carried out with editorial assistance or funding by one of the major pharmaceutical companies who produce the toxins. As such visibly unbiased discussion is lacking. The toxins are expensive and a large scale trial with all three of these licensed preparations would require significant funding.
Despite heterogeneity between studies, those with direct comparisons suggest that AbobotulinumtoxinA (Allergan, Dysport – Table 1) is superior to OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox, Allergan), and IncobotulinumtoxinA (Bocouture, Merz) may be even better, as the remainder of the studies using this toxin find the results to be ongoing at the end of the study duration, so no end point can be clearly extrapolated. This is illustrated in Figure 1. Figure 3 is a photograph of two of the brands commonly used in the UK.
An earlier study comparing skin structure in females of four different ethnic groups found that the sub-epidermal non-echogenic band, which is less pronounced in African Americans, is a sensitive marker of skin ageing. OCT imagery was used to show that the thickness of the dermal-epidermal junction (DEJ) decreased with age, but remained higher in African Americans than in Caucasians, confirming that skin ageing is delayed in African Americans compared with all other ethnic populations.40
The best comparison among the studies would be between the studies by Dailey et al. (2009)22 and Grimes et al. (2009).32 Sample sizes are similar18,41 and both use 100% female patients, injected on five occasions with OnabotulinumtoxinA. Unfortunately the studies are heterogeneous, as the age ranges differed but the mean age was 43.7.22 If we only compare the results where the same dose was used (2OU), by four months, patients in the group with Fitzpatrick types V/VI were still 60% satisfied, but there were only approximately 10% with response at maximum frown, as rated by both the patient and the assessor. There was however no blinding in the latter of these two trials. Therefore although the results appear to suggest a better longevity of effect in the lighter skin tones this is likely to be because these studies had less robust control on the assessment, and methods across the studies were heterogeneous so they cannot be directly compared. In fact Kane et al. found duration of effect to be slightly greater in African American subjects.29
Dailey et al.22 state that it is conceivable that further wrinkle reduction may be achieved with a treatment regimen that extends beyond 20 months,22 but there is paucity of data for treatments longer than one year. The study found that satisfaction improved with each treatment cycle; arguably those who were unsatisfied may be more likely to drop out.
One of the most important points from the results is that there is no average duration of effect, as so many of the end points are beyond the end of the time allocated to the study. No fewer than five of the studies included in the literature review found the effects to be ongoing past the last patient follow-up. In one study longevity was found to be between 10-21 weeks, while another study estimated 3-6 months longevity, which is arguably not precise enough to be very helpful to patients as a guide. The figures are so diverse that there is no simple advice that can be gleaned from them to inform patients. The effects may last between two and over six months. Furthermore the manner in which these results are measured may render these results inaccurate, as these studies reflect the perceived endpoint and treatment intervals respectively, which are two different measures. Moreover, the majority of studies examined the duration of the effect of the toxin on maximal contraction, not on wrinkle appearance at rest, which is in fact arguably the pertinent issue, as this is what most patients seeking glabellar treatment with toxin would want to achieve. One factor that was less well assessed in studies was that of practitioner competence, as these studies were often single practitioners, and none were students or trainees. This is likely to be a hugely influential factor in the successful outcome and longevity of the treatment as it may influence dose, position of injection and also communication with the patient.
In summary the current advice on longevity is flawed, as it is often based on the duration of loss of maximal contraction, and therefore not really describing the effect most patients probably seek. In review, having assessed what we know of how the different variables affect treatment duration it is possible to draw some conclusions and possible patient advice. The desirable duration of effect may differ according to its application. Advising not only on the duration but understanding the factors that may influence this could be used to achieve the most desirable duration for any given case.
Variable longevities of effect would be useful, as longer treatment durations reduce patient cost, and repeat visits, but shorter durations of effect may also be used to immobilise areas post-surgery. In the case of aesthetic treatments this could be a potential selling point for those patients who are unsure, and wish to 'try' a treatment before they commit.
Allergan. Full Prescribing Information. 2015 Available at: http://www.allergan.com/assets/pdf/botox_cosmetic_pi.pdf (accessed 28 August 2015).
Dolly J O, Aoki K R . The structure and mode of action of different botulinum toxins. Eur J Neurol 2006; 13: 1–9.
Carruthers A, Carruthers J . History of the cosmetic use of Botulinum A Exotoxin. Dermatol Surg 1998; 24: 1168–1169.
Blitzer A, Brin M F, Keen M S, Aviv J S . Botulinum toxin for the treatment of hyperfunctional lines of the face. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 119: 1018–1023.
Binder W J, Blitzer A, Brin M F . Treatment of hyperfunctional lines of the face with Botulinum Toxin A. Dermatol Surg 1998; 24: 1198–1205.
Research and Markets. Facial Aesthetics (Botulinum Toxin, Dermal Fillers) – Global Pipeline Analysis, Competitive Landscape and Market Forecasts to 2018. Dublin 2012. Available at: https://www.globalmarketanalyst.com/PRDetails/89/Facial-Aesthetics-Botulinum-Toxin-Dermal-Fillers-Global-Pipeline-Analysis-Competitive-Landscape-and-Market-Forecasts-to-2018 (accessed 5 February 2018).
American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Top Five Cosmetic Minimally Invasive Procedure 2014–2015.
Department of Health. Review of the Regulations of Cosmetic Interventions. Final Report. 2013. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/192028/Review_of_the_Regulation_of_Cosmetic_Interventions.pdf (accessed 5 February 2018).
Jandhyala R . UK registry for botulinum toxin type a use in cosmetic practice. J Aesthet Med 2015; 1: 1–5.
Rossetto O, Montecucco C . Chapter 2. How botulinum toxin works. Handbook of botulinum toxin treatment. Blackwell Science, 2003.
Foran P G, Mohammed N, Lisk G O et al. Evaluation of the therapeutic usefulness of botulinum neurotoxin B, C1, E and F compared with the long lasting Type A. J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 1363–1371.
Ravichandran E, Gong Y, Saleem F H, Ancharski D M, Joshi S G, Simpson L L . An initial assessment of the systemic pharmacokinetics of botulinum toxin. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2006; 318: 13431–13451.
Kawashima M, Harii K . An open-label, randomized, 64 week study repeating 10and 20U doses of botulinum toxin type A for treatment of glabellar lines in Japanese subjects. Int J Dermatol 2009; 48: 768–776.
Hicks R . Botox medical uses. 2015. Available at: https://www.webmd.boots.com/a-to-z-guides/botox-medical-uses (accessed 5 March 2015).
Klein A W, Mantell A . Electromyographic guidance in injecting botulinum toxin. Dermatol Surg 1998; 24: 1184–1186.
Bhatnagar D, Conkling N, Rafailovich M et al. An in vivo analysis of the effect and duration of treatment with botulinum toxin type A using digital image speckle correlation. Skin Res Technology 2013; 19: 220–229.
Lam T, Bengo P . A comparison of three retrospective self-reporting methods of measuring change in instructional practice. Am J Evaluation 2003; 24: 65–80.
Connor Gorber S, Schofield-Hurwitz S, Hardt J, Levasseur G, Tremblay M . The accuracy of self-reported smoking: a systematic review of the relationship between self-reported and cotinine-assessed smoking status. Nicotine Tob Res 2009; 11: 12–24.
Stone A A, Bachrach C A, Jobe J B, Kurtzman H S, Cain V S (eds). The science of self-report: implications for research and practice. Mahwah: Psychology Press, 1999
Crerand C E, Franklin M E, Sarwer D B . Body dysmorphic disorder and cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118: 167e180e.
Ascher B, Klap P, Marion MH . La toxine botulique dans le treatment de rides fronto-glabellaires et de la region orbitaire. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 1995; 40: 67–76.
Dailey R A, Philip A, Tardie G . Long-term treatment of glabellar rhytides using OnabotulinumtoxinA. Dermatol Surg 2011; 37: 918–928.
Klein A W . Dilution and storage of botulinum toxin. Dermatol Surg 1998; 24: 1179–1180.
Hankins C L, Strimling R, Rogers G S . Botulinum A Toxin for glabellar wrinkles. Dermatol Surg 1998; 24: 1181–1183.
Carruthers A, Carruthers J, Said S . Double-blind randomized, parallel group, dose ranging study of botulinum toxin type A (BOTOX, Allergan Inc.) in the treatment of glabellar lines. Munich, Germany, 2001.
Lowe N J, Ascher B, Heckman M . Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose response study of the safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin type A in subjects with crow's feet. Dermatol Surg. 2005; 31: 257–262.
Harii K I, Kawashima M . A double-blind, randomized, placebocontrolled, two-dose comparative study of Botulinum Toxin Type A for treating glabellar lines in Japanese subjects. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2008; 32: 724–730.
Shekelle P G, Woolf S H, Eccles M, Grimshaw J . Developing clinical guidelines. West J Med 1999; 170: 348–351.
Kane M A, Brandt F, Rohrich R J, Narins R S, Monheit G D, Huber M B . Evaluation of variable-dose treatment with a new US botulinum toxin type A (Dysport) for correction of moderate to severe glabellar lines: results from a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124: 1619–1629.
Kassir R, Kolluru A, Kassir M . Triple-blind, prospective, internally controlled comparative study between abobotulinumtoxinA and onabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of facial rhytids. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 2013; 3: 179–189.
Banegas R A, Farache F, Rancati A et al. The South American Glabellar Experience Study (SAGE): a multicenter retrospective analysis of real-world treatment patterns following the introduction of incobotulinumtoxina in Argentina. Aesthet Surg J 2013; 33: 1039–1045.
Grimes P E, Shabazz D . A four-month randomized, double-blind evaluation of the efficacy of botulinum toxin a for the treatment of glabellar lines in women with skin types V and VI. Dermatol Surg 2009; 35: 429–436.
Imhof M, Kühne, U . A phase III study of incobotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of glabellar frown lines. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 2011; 4: 28–34.
Prager W, Bee E K, Havermann I, Zschocke I . Onset, Longevity, and patient satisfaction with incobotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of glabellar frown lines: a single-arm, prospective clinical study. Clin Interv Aging 2013; 8: 449–456.
Proebstle T M, Chung G, Weissberg R, Pavicic T . Quantitative evaluation of the onset and longevity of the action of IncobotulinumtoxinA by skin displacement analysis in the treatment of glabellar frown lines. J Drugs Dermatol 2014; 13: 1067–1072.
Moy R, Maas C, Monheit G, Huber M B . Long-term safety and efficacy of a new botulinum toxin type A in treating glabellar lines. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2009; 11: 77–83.
Simpson L . The life history of a botulinum toxin molecule. Toxicon 2013; 68: 40–49.
Koshy J, Sharabi S, Feldman E, Hollier L, Patrinely J . Effect of dietary zinc and phytase supplementation on botulinum toxin treatments. J Drugs Dermatol 2012; 11: 507–512.
Bazian/NHS Choices. New zinc supplement Zytase is a 'botox-booster'. 10 September 2012. Available at: https://www.nhs.uk/news/medication/new-zinc-supplement-zytaze-is-a-botox-booster/ (accessed 6 February 2018).
Macfarlane J . Is this the new Botox booster? New pill 'keeps wrinkles at bay for 30% longer'. Available at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2200324/Botox-booster-Zytaze-New-pill-keeps-wrinkles-bay-30-cent-longer.html (accessed 6 February 2018).
Lowe N J, Maxwell A, Harper H . Botulinum A exotoxin for glabellar folds: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study with an electromyographic injection technique. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996; 35: 569–572.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wright, G., Lax, A. & Mehta, S. A review of the longevity of effect of botulinum toxin in wrinkle treatments. Br Dent J 224, 255–260 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.126
This article is cited by
Neue Botulinumtoxine in der ästhetischen Dermatologie
Der Hautarzt (2021)