Peri-implantitis is a poorly understood condition which is difficult to manage and better prevented with careful control of all phases of treatment.
Many aspects of prosthodontic treatment have an impact on peri-implant heath with far reaching potential consequences.
Prosthodontic procedures such as impression taking, temporisation, and cementation may have long term consequences as a result of contamination of the implant surface.
The use of low cost generic components, inappropriate materials, and poor decisions made in the laboratory may all impact upon peri-implant health.
Peri-implantitis has been described as progressive crestal bone loss around a dental implant. The condition is poorly understood, and is challenging to manage; it is commonly and widely attributed to issues with the implant, the implant surface, surgical technique and oral hygiene. The effect of prosthodontic stages of treatment on the postoperatively established state has not been adequately investigated. It is the authors' contention that the manner in which the implant is restored contributes significantly to prognosis and peri-implant disease experience, and that the role of prosthodontic aspects of treatment in the causation of peri-implantitis may be seriously underestimated. The prosthodontist has a clear role and responsibility in the avoidance of future peri-implant problems by ensuring that implants are restored in an entirely biologically and biomechanically sound manner. The number of implant treatments carried out year-on-year is rising apace, with more and more implants being restored in general dental practice. With the rapid emergence of lower cost dental implant systems and a broadening range of generic restorative options and components for well-established systems, there is an increasing need to consider and understand how the implant restorative process may have a negative impact upon the peri-implant tissues, and how this effect may be minimised and peri-implant health promoted and maintained by paying attention to detail throughout the entire process.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $20.79 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Zitzmann N U, Berglundh T . Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35: 286–291.
Lindhe J, Meyle J ; Group D of European Workshop on Periodontology. Peri-implant diseases: consensus report of the sixth European workshop on periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35: 282–285.
Fransson C, Wennstro¨m J, Tomasi C, Berglundh T . Extent of periimplantitisassociated bone loss. J Clin Periodontol 2009; 36: 357–363.
Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson A R . The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986; 1: 11–25.
Roos J, Sennerby L, Lekholm U, Jemt T, Gröndahl K, Albrektsson T . A qualitative and quantitative method for evaluating implant success: a 5-year retrospective analysis of the Brånemark implant. Int J Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12: 504–514.
Roos-Jansåker A M, Lindahl C, Renvert H, Renvert S . Ninetofourteen-year follow-up of implant treatment. Part II: presence of peri-implant lesions. J Clin Periodontol 2006; 33: 290–295.
Jemt T, Albrektsson T . Do long-term followed-up Brånemark implants commonly show evidence of pathological bone breakdown? A review based on recently published data. Periodontol 2000 2008; 47: 133–142.
Albrektsson T, Canullo L, Cochran D, De Bruyn H . 'Peri-implantitis': a complication of a foreign body or a man-made 'disease'. Facts and fiction. Clin Impant Dent Relat Res 2016; 18: 840–849.
Graziani F, Figuero E, Herrera D . Systematic review of quality of reporting, outcome measurements and methods to study efficacy of preventive and therapeutic approaches to peri-implant diseases. J Clin Periodontol 2012; 39: 224–244.
Esposito M, Grusovin M G, Worthington H V . Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri-implantitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 1: CD004970.
Salvi G E, Carollo-Bittel B, Lang N P . Effects of diabetes mellitus on periodontal and peri-implant conditions: update on associations and risks. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35: 398–409.
Turri A, Rossetti P H, Canullo L, Grusovin M G, Dahlin C . Prevalence of peri-implantitis in medically compromised patients and smokers: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016; 31: 111–118.
Mombelli A, Müller N, Cionca N . The epidemiology of peri-implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 67–76.
Heitz-Mayfield L J . Peri-implant diseases: diagnosis and risk indicators. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35: 292–304.
Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A . Oral implant surfaces: Part 1 – review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 536–543.
Alani A, Bishop K . Peri-implantitis. Part 2: Prevention and maintenance of peri-implant health. Br Dent J 2014; 217: 289–297.
Alani A, Bishop K, Renton T, Djemal S . Update on guidelines for selecting appropriate patients to receive treatment with dental implants: priorities for the NHS-the position after 15 years. Br Dent J 2014; 217: 189–190.
Mattheos N, Albrektsson T, Buser D et al. 1st European Consensus Workshop in Implant Dentistry University Education. Teaching and assessment of implant dentistry in undergraduate and postgraduate education: a European consensus. Eur J Dent Educ 2009; 13: 11–17.
Canullo L, Bignozzi I, Cocchetto R, Cristalli M P, Iannello G . Immediate positioning of a definitive abutment versus repeated abutment replacements in post-extractive implants: 3-year follow-up of a randomised multicentre clinical trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2010; 3: 285–296.
Swope E M, James R A . A longitudinal study on hemidesmosome formation at the dental implant-tissue overflow. J Oral Implantol 1981; 9: 412–422.
Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Lindhe J . The mucosal barrier following abutment dis/reconnection. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 1997; 24: 568–572.
Rompen E, Domken O, Degidi M, Pontes A E, Piatelli A . The effect of material characteristics, of surface topography and of implant components and connections on soft tissue integration: a literature review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 55–67.
Grandi T, Guazzi P, Samarani R, Maghaireh H, Grandi G . One abutment-one time versus a provisional abutment in immediately loaded post-extractive single implants: a 1-year follow-up of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2014; 7: 141–149.
Machtei E E, Frankenthal S, Levi G et al. Treatment of peri-implantitis using multiple applications of chlorhexidine chips: a double-blind, randomized multi-centre clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 2012; 39: 1198–1205.
Wadhwani C, Schonnenbaum T R, Audia F, Chung K H . In-Vitro Study of the Contamination Remaining on Used Healing Abutments after Cleaning and Sterilizing in Dental Practice. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2016; 18: 1069–1074.
Cakan U, Delibasi C, Er S, Kivanc M . Is it safe to reuse dental implant healing abutments sterilized and serviced by dealers of dental implant manufacturers? An in vitro sterility analysis. Implant Dent 2015; 24: 174–179.
Ko H C, Han J S, Bächle M, Jang J H, Shin S W, Kim D J . Initial osteoblast-like cell response to pure titanium and zirconia/ alumina ceramics. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 1349–1355.
Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Glantz P O, Lindhe J . The mucosal attachment at different abutments. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 1998; 25: 721–727.
Park J M, Lee J B, Heo S J, Park EJ . A comparative gold UCLA-type and CAD/CAM titanium implant abutments. J Adv Prosthodont 2014; 6: 46–52.
Kano S C, Binon P, Bonfante G, Curtis D A . Effect of casting procedure on screw loosening in UCLA-type abutments. J Prosthodont 2006; 15: 77–81.
Carlson B, Carlsson G E . Prosthodontic complications in osseointegrated dental implant treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994; 9: 90–94.
Chee W, Jivraj S . Screw versus cemented implant-supported restorations. Br Dent J 2006; 201: 501–507.
Gjelvold B, Sohrabi M M, Chrcanovic B R . Angled screw channel: an alternative to cemented single-implant restorations – three clinical examples. Int J Prosthodont 2016; 29: 74–76.
Su H, González-Martin O, Weisgold A, Lee E . Considerations of implant abutment and crown contour: critical contour and subcritical contour. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010; 30: 335–343.
Chrcanovic B R, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A . Platform switch and dental implants: A meta-analysis. J Dent 2015; 43: 629–646.
Romanos G E, Javed F . Platform switching minimises crestal bone around dental implants: truth or myth? J Oral Rehabil 2014; 41: 700–708.
Heitz-Mayfield L J, Needleman I, Salvi G E, Pjetursson B E . Consensus statements and clinical recommendations for prevention and management of biologic and technical implant complications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29: 346–350.
Serino G, Ström C . Peri-implantitis in partially edentulous patients: association with inadequate plaque control. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 169–174.
Haack J E, Sakaguchi R L, Sun T, Coffey J P . Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995; 10: 529–536.
Jemt T . Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Brånemark implants in edentulous jaws: a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991; 6: 270–276.
De Araújo Nobre M A, Maló P . The influence of rehabilitation characteristics in the incidence of peri-implant pathology: a case-control study. J Prosthodont 2014; 23: 21–30.
Berglundh T, Persson L, Klinge B . A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 29: 197–212.
Quirynen M, Bollen C M, Eyssen H, van Steenberghe D . Microbial penetration along the implant components of the Brånemark system. An in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994; 5: 239–244.
Do Nascimento C, Pita M S, Calefi PL, de Oliveira Silva T S, Dos Santos J B, Pedrazzi V . Different sealing materials preventing the microbial leakage into the screw-retained implant restorations: an in vitro analysis by DNA checkerboard hybridization. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017; 28: 242–250.
Hebel K S, Gajjar R C . Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restoration: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 77: 28–35.
Wilson TG Jr . The positive relationship between excess cement and peri-implant disease: a prospective clinical endoscopic study. J Periodontol 2009; 80: 1388–1392.
Korsch M, Obst U, Walther W . Cement-associated peri-implantitis: a retrospective clinical observational study of fixed implant-supported restorations using a methacrylate cement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014; 25: 797–802.
Liang T, Hu X, Zhu L, Pan X, Zhou Y, Liu J . Comparative in vitro study of cementing techniques for implant-supported restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 116: 59–66.
Naert I, Duyck J, Vandamme K . Occlusal overload and bone/implant loss. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 95–107.
Kim Y, Oh T J, Misch C E, Wang H L . Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 26–35.
About this article
Cite this article
Dawood, A., Marti, B. & Tanner, S. Peri-implantitis and the prosthodontist. Br Dent J 223, 325–332 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.755
Current Oral Health Reports (2020)
Der MKG-Chirurg (2020)
Experience with bruxism in the everyday oral implantology practice in the Netherlands: a qualitative study
BDJ Open (2018)
Annual review of selected scientific literature: A report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (2018)