A selection of abstracts of clinically relevant papers from other journals. The abstracts on this page have been chosen and edited by John R. Radford.
Abstract
Very rarely are issues of public interest more important than maintaining patient confidentiality.
Main
Coggon J, Wheeler R. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2010; 92: 113–117
Confidentiality is founded on 'the need for “reciprocal confidence”, if intimate information is to be shared'. It is applicable universally. For example, the authors cite a past injunction against a national newspaper from naming an HIV-positive dentist. Although this ruling 'inhibit(ed) a legitimate public debate over the ability or otherwise of HIV-positive dentists to continue in practice', it would have transgressed private information. When practitioners are confronted with dilemmas associated with patient confidentiality, a pragmatic approach would be 'proportionate disclosures on the basis of an obligation'. This is particularly relevant when violent crime has been perpetrated. Alternatively, permission could be sought from 'who(m) may be empowered to provide it (the patient)'. If there is an impasse, advice should be sought from the local Clinical Ethics Committee.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Confidence and conflicts of duty in surgery. Br Dent J 208, 521 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.538
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.538