We describe the pellet sampling data set from the Vertebrate Collection of the Museum of Zoology of the University of Navarra. This data set compiles all information about small mammals obtained from the analysis of owl pellets. The collection consists on skulls, mandibles, and some skeletons of 36 species of more than 72,000 georeferenced specimens. These specimens come from the Iberian Peninsula although most samples were collected in Navarra, a highly diverse transitional area of 10,000 kilometre square sitting across three biogeographical regions. The collection spans more than forty years and is still growing as a result of the establishment of a barn owl pellet monitoring network in 2015. The program will provide critical information about the evolution of the small mammals’ community in this transition zone as it changes over time.
|Design Type(s)||observation design • data integration objective • biodiversity assessment objective|
|Measurement Type(s)||species identification from bone fragments|
|Technology Type(s)||pellet dissection|
|Sample Characteristic(s)||Tyto alba • excreta • Province of Navarra|
Machine-accessible metadata file describing the reported data (ISA-Tab format)
Background & Summary
Natural history collections are in the spotlight of scientific community as they provide long-term data of species distribution all around the world1. These data sets that cover long periods of time are valuable as they are key in understanding and documenting biodiversity, providing a base point in time that allow comparison between previous conditions and current ones2–4. Many areas of scientific research such as climate change ecology, biodiversity distribution and invasive species rely on these biological records found in natural history collections5–7. In fact, collections are usually composed of voucher specimens which are valuable now and in coming years as they can be revised, verified and re-used in the future2,8. However, large portions of the vast amount of collections that could be digitalized and shared via repositories like GBIF, DRYAD or FIGSHARE are still locked away9–11 and the access to this enormous information is still complicated12. Therefore, it is essential that we bring these natural history collections to light making them accessible for the wider research community, allowing the assessment of current and prediction of future status of the biodiversity apparently being compromised13,14.
The Museum of Zoology of University of Navarra (MZNA) was established in 1980 to safeguard material from the research carried out in the former department of Zoology and Ecology and now Environmental Biology department15. It is a Data Provider for the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) and curates collections of vertebrates (see e.g., refs 16,17) and invertebrates18. One of its most complete data sets in terms of taxonomic, temporal and spatial coverage is the ‘Pellet sampling’ data set (Data Citation 1) included in the Vertebrate Collection of MZNA19. This data set includes information about small mammals' records obtained from the analysis of barn owl pellets. It refers skulls, mandibles and skeletons of more than 72,000 georeferenced specimens belonging to 36 species. From 1967 on, this collection increased in terms of number of species, specimens and spatial coverage, and continues to grow as a result of the establishment in 2015 of a monitoring network based on pellet sampling. The monitoring program is designed to provide new data at least twice a year increasing temporal resolution and allowing the assessment of seasonal trends in the small mammals’ community.
Specimens in this data set come from a heterogeneous area where Alpine, Atlantic and Mediterranean biogeographical regions20 come in contact. The North of Navarra is influenced by the Atlantic Ocean and the Pyrenean Range, whereas as we are move South the region turns into Mediterranean conditions within less than 100 km, with a complete turnover in the flora and fauna communities. Highly diverse climate coupled to complex topography make this region a highly interesting area for studying the transition between Eurosiberian species (from Atlantic and Alpine biogeographical regions) to Mediterranean ones.
The coincidence of a small but highly diverse biogeographical area and a long-term data set well represented across that very area allows for meaningful studies on the distribution patterns of the small mammals’ community. It also provides an opportunity to assess possible changes in species distributional ranges as a result of the ongoing environmental changes13. Navarra is subject to significant changes in land use21 that can affect the composition of its small mammals’ community, as reported in other areas both in Europe and worlwide22,23. Long-term series of data like this data set can bring to light shifts in the distributional ranges of species coping with warmer conditions, land uses changes or invasive species4,22,24.
The ‘Pellet sampling’ data set contains specimens from the Iberian Peninsula but most of the records come from the province of Navarra (>70%). Thus, hereinafter we will refer to Navarra as the study extent of the database.
Navarra is located in the north of Spain and covers an area of 10,391 km2 (Fig. 1). It is located between the western end of the Pyrenees and the Ebro Basin, including Alpine, Atlantic and Mediterranean biogeographical regions inside its territory. Due to its location and topography, Navarra is characterized by a wide range of climate conditions varying from Oceanic to Mediterranean, and high landscape diversity is associated with these particular conditions25,26. The northern half of Navarra reaches mean altitudes above 800 m (range 200–2,000 m), 1,200–1,700 mm mean annual precipitation and moderate temperatures. Its landscape is dominated by pastures and beech and oak forests as well as pine repopulation for wood exploitation. Further South, climate and landscape shift to altitudes below 400 m and lower rainfall (<400 mm). The high diversity of flora and fauna in Navarra derives from this transition from Eurosiberian to Mediterranean region in a relatively small distance of 160 km along the north-south axis26, and as a result of the variety of habitats the small mammals’ community in Navarra, which includes 31 of the 34 species of native insectivorous and rodents cited in the Iberian Peninsula27, is also highly diverse.
Specimens were obtained from barn owl pellets. This method has been proven to give a useful picture of the small mammals’ community28,29. Pellets were collected in places commonly used by barn owls such as nests and roosts found in churches and barns30. When a locality was positive for pellets, all pellets were collected.
More systematic surveys were fielded during the acquisition of data for a regional mammal atlas. In this study, Navarra was gridded with 10×10 km cells. Sampling sites were searched for potential localities holding barn owls nests or roosts. These places were usually bell towers and barns. However, there have been additional contributions from different sources such as research projects, PhD researches, donations, occasional sampling, volunteers and student’s works.
All pellets brought to the laboratory were frozen at −20 °C for at least a week to remove bugs and then dried at 50 °C to avoid fungal growth. Afterwards, pellets were stored in plastic bags indicating sampling site and the date until they were processed.
Once dried, pellets were dissected separating bones from the remaining fur and feathers. Skulls and mandibles were preserved while other remains were discarded. Specimens were identified to species level when possible using suitable literature31. If key characters were missing (e.g., teeth), specimens were identified to genus level. Mandibles found separately from skull were stored as well and identified to family level. After identification, data was digitalized in the MZNA database and the specimens were sealed in zip plastic bags labelled with their accession number and stored in the MZNA collection facility. Specimens consisting on skull and mandibles were stored together.
Data management and standardization
All specimens were systematically recorded in the MZNA database system (Zootron v.4)32.
This collection is accessible through IPT portal from GBIF. We carried out a major effort for standardize the records to within the DarwinCore Terms33. We used 39 controlled terms to describe the information contained in the data set: id, modified, institutionCode, collectionCode, basisOfRecord, occurrenceID, catalogNumber, otherCatalogNumbers, recordedBy, individualCount, sex, preparations, disposition, eventDate, verbatimEventDate, continent, island, country, stateProvince, locality, verbatimElevation, minimumElevationInMeters, maximumElevationInMeters, verbatimCoordinates, decimalLatitude, decimalLongitude, geodeticDatum, CoordinateUncertaintyInMeters, identifiedBy, scientificName, kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, specificEpithet, taxonRank, scientificNameAuthorship. For all definitions of these terms see33.
The term eventDate must be interpreted as the date when pellets were collected, not as the date of the capture of the prey which is unknown although it lies between consecutive pellet collection events for a locality. When a nest or roost is sampled, the pellets found are the result of accumulation of hunting events by the raptor. The batch number can be found under the term otherCatalogNumbers.
The pellet sampling data set is hosted by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility and can be found in one.txt file (Data Citation 1) in DarwinCore standards of GBIF33. The data descriptor we present here corresponds to version 2.4 of this data set.
The data set is an occurrence-based table that contains 73,574 records of small mammals derived from the analysis of barn owl pellets (see also Fig. 2). More than the 99% of the records are georeferenced (73,474 records) and 73,316 records (99.6%) include at least the collection date with year resolution. However, the number of ‘complete’ records -those that reach species level, include full coordinates and complete day date (year, month and day) are 48,003 (65.2%).
The data set includes 5 orders, 10 families and 36 species. Rodents and soricomorphs make up most of the collection. Muridae and Soricidae are the most abundant families in the data set (Fig. 2), being 39.66 and 31.67% respectively, followed by Cricetidae with 28.51% of the total records. Information about bats, lagomorphs and carnivores is scarce, representing less than 1% of the collection (for more details in taxonomic coverage see Tables 1 and 2). Skulls and mandibles dominate the collection deposited in MZNA.
The resources of this data set are diverse including systematic surveys for the regional atlas, monitoring network, thesis projects, students work, occasional pellet sampling, donations and volunteer contributions. This variety of resources translated into varying completeness of the data, as each resource was fit for its particular purpose; but the aggregation of the records into the data set was designed to maintain their fitness-for-use (FFU) throughout34.
Most of the specimens come from the north of Iberian Peninsula (Fig. 1) and date from 1967 to the present time. The way in which data has accumulated over time is shown in Fig. 3. The years prior to the elaboration of a regional small mammals’ atlas27 peak between 1987 and 1992. Another period of constant sampling effort was the early 80’s. There is a gap after 1996. However, the establishment of the monitoring network in 2015 is being providing new sampling sites and specimens to the collection every year, increasing the temporal coverage and the possibility of use of this data in global change ecology, and changing distributional patterns or species distributional models. Data derived from this monitoring network will be updated annually.
While standardizing the records to DarwinCore standards, we carried out a major effort for checking errors and inconsistencies among the data. We followed the guidelines proposed by Chapman35 and checked taxonomical, geographical and temporal errors in the data set.
Most specimen identifications were verified by Dr Escala, professor of Zoology, the main responsible for the creation of the collection. Other experienced researchers have also contributed to the identification of specimens from this collection.
Various coordinate formats were found during the standardization of the data. Most localities were originally georeferenced within the UTM projection system and noted down as military grid coordinates, although more recently digitalized records already used geographic coordinates. However, as a requirement of DarwinCore standards, all coordinates in UTM/MGRS were transformed to geographic coordinates. Coordinate uncertainty was calculated using the point-radius method and given in meters. Verbatim coordinates are preserved in the data set and can be used as well. Finally, we checked locality consistency by visual inspection overlapping then against an administrative map using GIS38. We also searched coordinates in a gazetteer for localities that lacked this geographical information.
Temporal errors were checked. Collecting dates format was transformed to the ISO 8601 format (i.e., YYYY-MM-DD).
How to cite this article: Escribano, N. et al. Long-term data set of small mammals from owl pellets in the Atlantic-Mediterranean transition area. Sci. Data 3:160085 doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.85 (2016).
Boakes, E. H. et al. Distorted Views of Biodiversity: Spatial and Temporal Bias in Species Occurrence Data. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000385 (2010).
Clemann, N. et al. Value and impacts of collecting vertebrate voucher specimens, with guidelines for ethical collection. Mem. Museum Victoria 72, 141–151 (2014).
Boero, F., Kraberg, A. C., Krause, G. & Wiltshire, K. H. Time is an affliction: Why ecology cannot be as predictive as physics and why it needs time series. J. Sea Res. 101, 12–18 (2015).
Lindenmayer, D. B. et al. Value of long-term ecological studies. Austral Ecol. 37, 745–757 (2012).
Powney, G. D. & Isaac, N. J. B. Beyond maps: a review of the applications of biological records. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 115, 532–542 (2015).
Shaffer, H. B., Fisher, R. N. & Davidson, C. The role of natural history collections in documenting species declines. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 27–30 (1998).
Suarez, A. V. & Tsutsui, N. D. The Value of Museum Collections for Research and Society. Bioscience 54, 66–74 (2004).
Rocha, L. A. et al. Specimen collection: An essential tool. Science 344, 814–816 (2014).
Ariño, A. H. Approaches to estimating the universe of natural history collections data. Biodivers. Informatics 7, 81–92 (2010).
Beaman, R. & Cellinese, N. Mass digitization of scientific collections: New opportunities to transform the use of biological specimens and underwrite biodiversity science. Zookeys 209, 7–17 (2012).
Scoble, M. & Bourgoin, T. Natural history collections digitization: rationale and value. Biodivers. Informatics 7, 77–80 (2010).
Casas-marce, M., Revilla, E., Fernandes, M. & Delibes, M. The Value of Hidden Scientific Resources: Preserved Animal Specimens from Private Collections and Small Museums. Bioscience 62, 1077–1082 (2012).
Sala, O. E. et al. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287, 1770–1774 (2000).
Sánchez-Fernández, D., Lobo, J. M. & Hernández-Manrique, O. L. Species distribution models that do not incorporate global data misrepresent potential distributions: A case study using Iberian diving beetles. Divers. Distrib. 17, 163–171 (2011).
University of Navarra. Museum of Zoology at http://www.gbif.org/publisher/2f390a80-56f3-11da-880b-b8a03c50a862 (2016).
Salinas, J. A. & Ariño, A. H. Las Colecciones del Museo de Ciencias Naturales de la Universidad de Navarra. I. Vertebrados. Ser. Zool. 27, 1–101 (2000).
Escala, M. C., Galicia, D. & Ariño, A. H. Amphibians and Reptiles in the Museum of Zoology of the University of Navarra. Ser. Zool 31, 1–94 (2007).
Larraz, M. L. & Equisoain, J. J. Moluscos Terrestres y Acuáticos de Navarra (Norte de la Península Ibérica). Ser. Zool 23, 1–326 (1993).
Museum of Zoology of University of Navarra. Vertebrate Collection at http://datos.gbif.es/collectory/public/show/co82 (2016).
European Environment Agency. Biogeographical Regions. 1-6 (2016).
Fuchs, R., Herold, M., Verburg, P. H., Clevers, J. G. P. W. & Eberle, J. Gross changes in reconstructions of historic land cover/use for Europe between 1900 and 2010. Glob. Chang. Biol. 21, 1–16 (2014).
Szpunar, G., Aloise, G. & Mazzotti, S. Effects of global climate change on terrestrial small mammal communities in Italy. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 17, 1526–1533 (2008).
Torre, I., Gracia-Quintas, L., Arrizabalaga, A., Baucells, J. & Díaz, M. Are recent changes in the terrestrial small mammal communities related to land use change? A test using pellet analyses. Ecol. Res 30, 813–819 (2015).
Moritz, C. et al. Impact of a century of climate change on small-mammal communities in Yosemite National Park, USA. Science 322, 261–264 (2008).
Nogués-Bravo, D. Assessing the effect of environmental and anthropogenic factors on land-cover diversity in a Mediterranean mountain environment. Area 38, 432–444 (2006).
Loidi, J. & Báscones, J. C . Memoria del mapa de series de vegetación de Navarra. E 1:200.000. Gobierno de Navarra. Departamento de Medio Ambiente, Ordenacion del Territorio y Vivienda, (1995).
Escala, C., Irurzun, J. C., Rueda, A. & Ariño, A. H. Atlas de los Insectívoros y Roedores de Navarra. Análisis biogeográfico. Ser. Zool. 25 (1997).
Avenant, N. L. Barn owl pellets: a useful tool for monitoring small mammal communities? Belgian J. Zool. 135, 39–43 (2005).
Torre, I., Arrizabalaga, A. & Flaquer, C. Three methods for assessing richness and composition of small mammal communities. J. Mammal. 85, 524–530 (2004).
Taylor, I. Barn Owls: Predator-Prey Relationships and Conservation (Cambridge University Press, 2004).
Gosálbez, J. Insectivors i rosegadors de Catalunya (Ketres, 1987).
Ariño, A. H. Bibliography of Iberian polychaetes: A data base. Ophelia Suppl 5, 647–652 (1991).
Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG). Darwin Core Terms: A quick reference guide (2015) at http://www.tdwg.org/.
Hill, A. W., Otegui, J., Ariño, A. H. & Guralnick, R. P. GBIF Position Paper on Future Directions and Recommendations for Enhancing Fitness-for-Use Across the GBIF Network, version 1.0. (2010).
Chapman, A. D. Principles and Methods of Data Cleaning - Primary Species and Species-Occurrence Data, version 1.0. Report of the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (Copenhagen, 2005)
Palomo, L. J., Gisbert, J. & Blanco, J. C. Atlas y libro rojo de los mamíferos terrestres de España. Dirección General para la Biodiversidad-SECEM-SECEMU, (2007).
Wilson, D. E. & Reeder, D. M. Mammal Species of the World (2005) at http://vertebrates.si.edu/msw/mswCFApp/msw/index.cfm.
ESRI. ArcGIS deskopt 10.0. (2015).
University of Navarra, Museum of Zoology The Global Biodiversity Information Facility http://doi.org/10.15470/qomfu6 (2016)
We want to express our gratitude to all researches, volunteers and students that have collaborated to this collection providing pellets from different localities around the Iberian Peninsula. Without their unselfish effort, the collection would be far less complete. We also are thankful to Ana Amezcua, Ángel Chaves and María Imas and all technical personnel that have worked in the Museum of Zoology of University of Navarra and have curated the vertebrate collection of the MZNA. We would like also to show our gratitude to Katia Cezón (Spanish GBIF node) for her technical support in the publication of the dataset. We thank Asociación de Amigos of University of Navarra for supporting the PhD research of Nora Escribano. The Ministry of Science and Education provided partial support towards the digitalization of this collection through grants CGL2004-20867-E/BOS and CGL2008-05198-E/BOS.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Escribano, N., Galicia, D., Ariño, A. et al. Long-term data set of small mammals from owl pellets in the Atlantic-Mediterranean transition area. Sci Data 3, 160085 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.85