Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Graduate students need more quantitative methods support

Nature Reviews Psychology volume 3, pages 140–141 (2024)Cite this article

Subjects

Graduate students in psychology need hands-on support to conduct research using quantitative techniques that exceed their curricular training. If supervisors are not willing or able to provide this support, student-led projects must be redesigned to leverage basic statistical skills learned in the classroom.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Thompson, R., Wylie, J. & Hanna, D. Maths anxiety in psychology undergraduates: a mixed-methods approach to formulating and implementing interventions. Psychol. Teach. Rev. 22, 58–68 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Carpenter, T. P. & Kirk, R. E. Are psychology students getting worse at math? Trends in the math skills of psychology statistics students across 21 years. Educ. Stud. 43, 282–295 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blanca, M. J., Alarcón, R. & Bono, R. Current practices in data analysis procedures in psychology: What has changed? Front. Psychol. 9, 2558 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Hertzog, C., Dunlosky, J., Robinson, A. E. & Kidder, D. P. Encoding fluency is a cue used for judgments about learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 29, 22–34 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pek, J. & Bauer, D. J. How can we move advanced methodology into practice more effectively? Policy Insights Behav. Brain Sci. 10, 3–10 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. American Psychological Association. Report of the Task Force for Increasing the Number of Quantitative Psychologists (APA, 2009).

  7. Shrout, P. E. & Rodgers, J. L. Psychology, science, and knowledge construction: Broadening perspectives from the replication crisis. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 69, 487–510 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hardwicke, T. E. & Vazire, S. Transparency is now the default at Psychological Science. Psychol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976231221573 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. GAISE College Report ASA Revision Committee. Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education (GAISE) College Report 2016 (ASA, 2016).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

    Andrea L. Howard

Authors
  1. Andrea L. Howard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea L. Howard.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Howard, A.L. Graduate students need more quantitative methods support. Nat Rev Psychol 3, 140–141 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-024-00288-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-024-00288-y

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing