Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Coping with common PhD challenges by making the implicit explicit

It is normal to deal with difficult situations during PhD studies. Students and their advisors can set themselves up for success and minimize potential challenges with foreknowledge and by making expectations and workflows explicit.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Morey, R. D. & Morey, C. C. Habits and open science. APS Obs. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/habits-and-open-science (2016).

  2. Turoman, N., Hautekiet, C., Jeanneret, S., Valentini, B. & Langerock, N. Open and reproducible practices in developmental psychology research: the workflow of the WomCogDev lab as an example. Infant Child Dev. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2333 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rouder, J. N., Haaf, J. M. & Snyder, H. K. Minimizing mistakes in psychological science. Adv. Methods Pract. Psychol. Sci. 2, 3–11 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jaremka, L. M. et al. Common academic experiences no one talks about: repeated rejection, impostor syndrome, and burnout. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 15, 519–543 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. John, L. K., Loewenstein, G. & Prelec, D. Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychol. Sci. 23, 524–532 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D. & Simonsohn, U. False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychol. Sci. 22, 1359–1366 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C. & Mellor, D. T. The preregistration revolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 2600–2606 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. American Psychological Association. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association 7th ed. (APA, 2020).

  9. CRediT. 14 Contributor Roles https://credit.niso.org/ (2023).

  10. Aly, M. The key to a happy lab life is in the manual. Nature 561, 7–8 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks P. A. Fiave, C. Hautekiet, K. Jordan, N. Langerock, H. Mishima and N. Turoman for their feedback on the challenging situations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evie Vergauwe.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vergauwe, E. Coping with common PhD challenges by making the implicit explicit. Nat Rev Psychol 3, 6–7 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00267-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00267-9

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing