Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Mentorship practices that improve the culture of peer review

Nature Reviews Psychology volume 3, pages 2–3 (2024)Cite this article

Subjects

The current system of peer review drives racial and gender disparities in publication and funding outcomes and can suppress the perspectives of marginalized scholars. Established researchers have an opportunity to help to build a fairer and more inclusive peer review culture by advocating for and empowering their trainees.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Roberts, S. O. Dealing with diversity in psychology: science and ideology. Preprint at PsyArxiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/xk4yu (2022).

  2. Aly, M. et al. Changing the culture of peer review for a more inclusive and equitable psychological science. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001461 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoppe, T. A. et al. Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw7238 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Settles, I. H., Jones, M. K., Buchanan, N. T. & Brassel, S. T. Epistemic exclusion of women faculty and faculty of color: understanding scholar(ly) devaluation as a predictor of turnover intentions. J. Higher Educ. 93, 31–55 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu, F., Rahwan, T. & AlShebli, B. Non-White scientists appear on fewer editorial boards, spend more time under review, and receive fewer citations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2215324120 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Roberts, S. O. & Mortenson, E. Challenging the White = neutral framework in psychology. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 18, 597–606 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Draper, C. E. et al. Publishing child development research from around the world: An unfair playing field resulting in most of the world’s child population under-represented in research. Infant Child Dev. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2375 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Roberts, S. O., Bareket-Shavit, C., Dollins, F. A., Goldie, P. D. & Mortenson, E. Racial inequality in psychological research: trends of the past and recommendations for the future. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 15, 1295–1309 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Majid, A. Establishing psychological universals. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 2, 199–200 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Oreskes, N. Why Trust Science? (Princeton Univ. Press, 2019).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the National Science Foundation (DGE-2224777).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

    Mariam Aly

  2. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA

    Shahana Ansari & Amanda B. Diekman

  3. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA

    Eliana Colunga

  4. Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA

    M. J. Crockett

  5. University Center for Human Values, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA

    M. J. Crockett

  6. Department of Linguistics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA

    Matthew Goldrick

  7. Department of Psychology, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY, USA

    Pablo Gomez

  8. Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA

    Franki Y. H. Kung

  9. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

    Paul C. McKee

  10. Department of Psychology, North Park University, Chicago, IL, USA

    Miriam Pérez

  11. Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Sarah M. Stilwell

Authors
  1. Mariam Aly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shahana Ansari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eliana Colunga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. J. Crockett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Amanda B. Diekman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Matthew Goldrick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Pablo Gomez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Franki Y. H. Kung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Paul C. McKee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Miriam Pérez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Sarah M. Stilwell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mariam Aly.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aly, M., Ansari, S., Colunga, E. et al. Mentorship practices that improve the culture of peer review. Nat Rev Psychol 3, 2–3 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00261-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00261-1

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing