Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Computational psychiatry and the lived experience of mental illness

The next generation of translational measures must exhibit greater construct validity in their capacity to capture the dynamic nature of mental illness.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Brendler, J., Silver, M., Haber, M. & Sargent, J. Madness, Chaos, and Violence: Therapy with Families at the Brink (Basic Books, 1991).

  2. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D. & Funder, D. C. Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2, 396–403 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu, C. C., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., Katovich, K. & Knutson, B. Affective traits link to reliable neural markers of incentive anticipation. Neuroimage 84, 279–289 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Huys, Q. J. M., Browning, M., Paulus, M. P. & Frank, M. J. Advances in the computational understanding of mental illness. Neuropsychopharmacology 46, 3–19 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, V. M., Chen, J., Gillan, C. M. & Price, R. B. Improving the reliability of computational analyses: model-based planning and its relationship with compulsivity. Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging 5, 601–609 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hitchcock, P. F., Fried, E. I. & Frank, M. J. Computational psychiatry needs time and context. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 73, 243–270 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hedge, C., Powell, G. & Sumner, P. The reliability paradox: why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences. Behav. Res. Methods 50, 1166–1186 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pascual-Leone, A., Herpertz, S. C. & Kramer, U. Experimental designs and the ‘emotion stimulus critique’: hidden problems and potential solutions in the study of emotion. Psychopathology 49, 60–68 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Loucks, L. et al. You can do that?!: feasibility of virtual reality exposure therapy in the treatment of PTSD due to military sexual trauma. J. Anxiety Disord. 61, 55–63 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Franklin, J. C., Huang, X. & Bastidas, D. Virtual reality suicide: development of a translational approach for studying suicide causes. Behav. Res. Ther. 120, 103360 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael T. Treadway.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author is a paid consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim. This work is not related to the views expressed in the current article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Treadway, M.T. Computational psychiatry and the lived experience of mental illness. Nat Rev Psychol 2, 67–68 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00142-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00142-z

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing