Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Moving beyond social categories by incorporating context in social psychological theory

Abstract

Across phenomena and areas of inquiry, social psychology often emphasizes social categories as the unit of explanation. However, the primacy of categories often leads social psychologists to neglect contextual features that might shape people’s psychologies and behaviour, limiting social psychology theories and their real-world applications. In this Perspective, we urge researchers to move beyond categories and incorporate context more deeply into their theorizing. To make this call actionable, we introduce social constructionism, assemblage theory and dynamic systems as alternative frameworks and present examples of how these frameworks already inform social psychology research. The work featured is not an exhaustive review of research emphasizing context in psychological theorizing, but rather serves to highlight the importance of alternatives to category-based or pseudo-universal frameworks. Social science that considers context must focus on psychological, structural and material features (rather than classifications), their interconnections, and temporal dynamism.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Case study.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brubaker, R. Ethnicity Without Groups (Harvard Univ. Press, 2004).

  2. Fields, K. E. & Fields, B. J. Racecraft: The Soul Of Inequality In American Life (Verso, 2012).

  3. Rodríguez-Muñiz, M. Figures Of The Future: Latino Civil Rights And The Politics Of Demographic Change (Princeton Univ. Press, 2021).

  4. Morgenroth, T. & Ryan, M. K. The effects of gender trouble: an integrative theoretical framework of the perpetuation and disruption of the gender/sex binary. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 16, 1113–1142 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sen, M. & Wasow, O. Race as a bundle of sticks: designs that estimate effects of seemingly immutable characteristics. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 19, 499–522 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Monk, E. P. Inequality without groups: contemporary theories of categories, intersectional typicality, and the disaggregation of difference. Sociol. Theory 40, 3–27 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brick, C., Hood, B., Ekroll, V. & de-Wit, L. Illusory essences: a bias holding back theorizing in psychological science. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 17, 491–506 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gillespie, A., Howarth, C. S. & Cornish, F. Four problems for researchers using social categories. Cult. Psychol. 18, 391–402 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bronfenbrenner, U. The Ecology Of Human Development: Experiments By Nature And Design (Harvard Univ. Press, 1996).

  10. Cialdini, R. B. We have to break up. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 4, 5–6 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gergen, K. J. Social psychology as history. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 26, 309–320 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lewin, K. Field theory and experiment in social psychology: concepts and methods. Am. J. Sociol. 44, 868–896 (1939).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ledgerwood, A., Pickett, C., Navarro, D., Remedios, J. D. & Lewis, N. A. The unbearable limitations of solo science: team science as a path for more rigorous and relevant research. Behav. Brain Sci. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/5yfmq (2021).

  14. Lewis, N. A. What counts as good science? How the battle for methodological legitimacy affects public psychology. Am. Psychol. 76, 1323–1333 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Winston, A. S. Defining Difference: Race And Racism In The History Of Psychology (American Psychological Association, 2004).

  16. Hester, N. & Gray, K. For black men, being tall increases threat stereotyping and police stops. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 2711–2715 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Agan, A. & Starr, S. Ban the box, criminal records, and racial discrimination: a field experiment. Q. J. Econ. 133, 191–235 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dixon-Román, E. Inheriting Possibility: Social Reproduction And Quantification In Education (Univ. Minnesota Press, 2017).

  19. Teo, T. Empirical race psychology and the hermeneutics of epistemological violence. Hum. Stud. 34, 237–255 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Adams, G., Estrada-Villalta, S. & Gómez Ordóñez, L. H. The modernity/coloniality of being: hegemonic psychology as intercultural relations. Int. J. Intercult. Relat. 62, 13–22 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fox, D. & Prilleltensky, I. Critical Psychology: An Introduction (Sage Publications, 1997).

  22. Martín-Baró, I., Aron, A. & Corne, S. Writings For A Liberation Psychology (Harvard Univ. Press, 1994).

  23. Okazaki, S., David, E. J. R. & Abelmann, N. Colonialism and psychology of culture: colonialism and psychology. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Compass 2, 90–106 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sabik, N. J., Matsick, J. L., McCormick-Huhn, K. & Cole, E. R. Bringing an intersectional lens to “open” science: an analysis of representation in the reproducibility project. Psychol. Women Q. 45, 475–492 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Salter, P. S., Adams, G. & Perez, M. J. Racism in the structure of everyday worlds: a cultural-psychological perspective. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 27, 150–155 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pessoa, L., Medina, L. & Desfilis, E. Refocusing neuroscience: moving away from mental categories and towards complex behaviours. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 377, 20200534 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Birhane, A. The impossibility of automating ambiguity. Artif. Life 27, 44–61 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D. & Funder, D. C. Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2, 396–403 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Syed, M. Psychology of COVID-19 preprint tracker. Preprint at OSF Preprints https://osf.io/m9axf/ (2020).

  30. IJzerman, H. et al. Use caution when applying behavioural science to policy. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 1092–1094 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. van Bavel, J. J. et al. Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 460–471 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Reid, A. E., Cialdini, R. B. & Aiken, L. S. Social norms and health behavior. In Handbook Of Behavioral Medicine: Methods And Applications (eds Steptoe, A., Freedland, K. E. & US Academy of Behavioral Medicine Research) 263–274 (Springer, 2010).

  33. Berkowitz, A. D. An overview of the social norms approach. In Changing The Culture Of College Drinking: A Socially Situated Health Communication Campaign (eds Lederman, L. C. & Stewart, L.) 193–214 (Hampton Press, 2005).

  34. Dickie, R., Rasmussen, S., Cain, R., Williams, L. & MacKay, W. The effects of perceived social norms on handwashing behaviour in students. Psychol. Health Med. 23, 154–159 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J. & Norenzayan, A. The weirdest people in the world? Behav. Brain Sci. 33, 61–83 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Premachandra, B. & Lewis, N. A. Do we report the information that is necessary to give psychology away? A scoping review of the psychological intervention literature 2000–2018. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 17, 226–238 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Derricks, V. & Earl, A. Information targeting increases the weight of stigma: leveraging relevance backfires when people feel judged. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 82, 277–293 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rimal, R. N., Lapinski, M. K. & Turner, M. M. The attribute-centered approach for understanding health behaviors: initial ideas and future research directions. Stud. Commun. Sci. 11, 15–34 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Earl, A. & Lewis, N. A. Health in context: new perspectives on healthy thinking and healthy living. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 81, 1–3 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rothman, A. J. ‘Is there nothing more practical than a good theory?’: why innovations and advances in health behavior change will arise if interventions are used to test and refine theory. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 1, 11 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Oyserman, D. & Lewis, N. A. Seeing the destination and the path: using identity-based motivation to understand and reduce racial disparities in academic achievement. Soc. Issues Policy Rev. 11, 159–194 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y. & Lindsay, D. S. Constraints on generality (COG): a proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 12, 1123–1128 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Whitsett, D. D. & Shoda, Y. An approach to test for individual differences in the effects of situations without using moderator variables. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 50, 94–104 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Lewis, N. A. Jr., Kougias, D. G., Takahashi, K. J. & Earl, A. The behavior of same-race others and its effects on black patients’ attention to publicly presented HIV-prevention information. Health Commun. 36, 1252–1259 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Momennejad, I., Sinclair, S. & Cikara, M. Computational justice: simulating structural bias and interventions. Preprint at bioRXiv https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/776211v1 (2019).

  46. Resnicow, K. & Page, S. E. Embracing chaos and complexity: a quantum change for public health. Am. J. Public. Health 98, 1382–1389 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Lewis, N. A. Jr. On ‘light-touches’ and ‘heavy-hands’: 2 strategies to tackle educational inequities. The Brookings Institution https://www.brookings.edu/blog/brown-center-chalkboard/2019/09/12/on-light-touches-and-heavy-hands-2-strategies-to-tackle-educational-inequities/ (2019).

  48. Paluck, E. L., Porat, R., Clark, C. S. & Green, D. P. Prejudice reduction: progress and challenges. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 72, 533–560 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Albarracin, D., Rothman, A. J., Di Clemente, R. & del Rio, C. Wanted: a theoretical roadmap to research and practice across individual, interpersonal, and structural levels of analysis. AIDS Behav. 14, 185–188 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Suls, J. & Rothman, A. Evolution of the biopsychosocial model: prospects and challenges for health psychology. Health Psychol. 23, 119–125 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Grzanka, P. R. & Cole, E. R. An argument for bad psychology: disciplinary disruption, public engagement, and social transformation. Am. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000853 (2021).

  52. Mook, D. G. In defense of external invalidity. Am. Psychol. 38, 379–387 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Latour, B. From multiculturalism to multinaturalism: what rules of method for the new socio-scientific experiments? Nat. Cult. 6, 1–17 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Barad, K. Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs J. Women Cult. Soc. 28, 801–831 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Grosz, E. A. The Incorporeal: Ontology, Ethics, And The Limits Of Materialism (Columbia Univ. Press, 2017).

  56. De Genova, N. The legal production of Mexican/migrant ‘“illegality”’. Lat. Stud. 2, 160–185 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Hochman, A. Racialization: a defense of the concept. Ethn. Racial Stud. 42, 1245–1262 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Hochman, A. Further defense of the racialization concept: a reply to Uyan. Du Bois Rev. 18, 31–48 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Morgenroth, T. & Ryan, M. K. Gender trouble in social psychology: how can Butler’s work inform experimental social psychologists’ conceptualization of gender? Front. Psychol. 9, 1320 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Reicher, S. & Hopkins, N. Psychology and the end of history: a critique and a proposal for the psychology of social categorization. Polit. Psychol. 22, 383–407 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Danziger, K. The varieties of social construction. Theory Psychol. 7, 399–416 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Gergen, K. J. The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. Am. Psychol. 40, 266–275 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Haslanger, S. Resisting Reality: Social Construction And Social Critique (Oxford Univ. Press, 2012).

  64. Hacking, I. The Social Construction of What? (Harvard Univ. Press, 1999).

  65. Rose, N. Power and subjectivity: critical history and psychology. In Historical Dimensions of Psychological Discourse (eds Graumann, C. F. & Gergen, K. J.) 103–124 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996).

  66. Danziger, K. Constructing the Subject: Historical Origins of Psychological Research (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990).

  67. Henriques, J., Hollway, W., Urwin, C., Venn, C. & Walkerdine, V. Changing The Subject: Psychology, Social Regulation, And Subjectivity (Routledge, 2004).

  68. Morss, J. R. Growing Critical Alternatives To Developmental Psychology (Routledge, 2002).

  69. Sampson, E. E. Deconstructing psychology’s subject. J. Mind Behav. 4, 135–164 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Stainton Rogers, R., Stenner, P. & Gleeson, K. Social Psychology: A Critical Agenda (Polity Press, Basil Blackwell, 1995).

  71. Papadopoulos, D. In the ruins of representation: identity, individuality, subjectification. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 47, 139–165 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Potter, J. & Wetherell, M. Discourse And Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour (Sage Publications, 1987).

  73. Blumer, H. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective And Method (Univ. California Press, 1969).

  74. Bolis, D. & Schilbach, L. ‘I interact therefore I am’: the self as a historical product of dialectical attunement. Topoi 39, 521–534 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Ásta. Categories we live by: the Construction of Sex, Gender, Race, and other Social Categories (Oxford Univ. Press, 2018).

  76. Deleuze, G. Difference and Repetition (Columbia Univ. Press, 1994).

  77. Gershman, S. J. & Cikara, M. Social-structure learning. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 29, 460–466 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Gershman, S. J. & Cikara, M. Structure learning principles of stereotype change. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://psyarxiv.com/52f9c/ (2021).

  79. Flores, R. D. & Schachter, A. Who are the “illegals”? The social construction of illegality in the United States. Am. Sociol. Rev. 83, 839–868 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Quintana, R. What race and gender stand for: using Markov blankets to identify constitutive and mediating relationships. J. Comput. Soc. Sci. 5, 751–779 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-021-00152-6.

  81. Schachter, A., Flores, R. D. & Maghbouleh, N. Ancestry, color, or culture? How whites racially classify others in the US. Am. J. Sociol. 126, 1220–1263 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Zuberi, T. Deracializing social statistics: problems in the quantification of race. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 568, 172–185 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Martinez, J. E. & Paluck, E. L. Quantifying shared and idiosyncratic judgments of racism in social discourse. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://psyarxiv.com/kfpjg/ (2020).

  84. Nichterlein, M. & Morss, J. R. Deleuze and Psychology: Philosophical Provocations to Psychological Practices (Routledge, 2016).

  85. Rosiek, J. L., Snyder, J. & Pratt, S. L. The new materialisms and indigenous theories of non-human agency: making the case for respectful anti-colonial engagement. Qual. Inq. 26, 331–346 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Todd, Z. An indigenous feminist’s take on the ontological turn: ‘ontology’ is just another word for colonialism: an indigenous feminist’s take on the ontological turn. J. Hist. Sociol. 29, 4–22 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Coole, D. H. New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, And Politics (Duke Univ. Press, 2010).

  88. De Landa, M. Assemblage Theory (Edinburgh Univ. Press, 2016).

  89. Haraway, D. J. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (Routledge, 1991).

  90. Dolphijn, R. & Tuin van der, I. New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies (Open Humanities Press, 2012).

  91. Bennett, J. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things (Duke Univ. Press, 2010).

  92. Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (Univ. Minnesota Press, 1987).

  93. Buchanan, I. Assemblage Theory And Method: An Introduction And Guide (Bloomsbury Academic, 2021).

  94. Rutzou, T. & Elder-Vass, D. On assemblages and things: fluidity, stability, causation stories, and formation stories. Sociol. Theory 37, 401–424 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism And Schizophrenia (Univ. Minnesota Press, 1983).

  96. Abbott, A. D. Processual Sociology (Univ. Chicago Press, 2016).

  97. Renault, E. Critical theory and processual social ontology. J. Soc. Ontol. 2, 17–32 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Tucker, I. Deleuze, sense, and life: Marking the parameters of a psychology of individuation. Theory Psychol. 22, 771–785 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Tucker, I. Deleuze, Simondon and the problem of psychological life. Annu. Rev. Crit. Psychol. 14, 127–144 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  100. Brown, S. D. & Stenner, P. Psychology Without Foundations: History, Philosophy And Psychosocial Theory (Sage, 2009).

  101. Feldman, M. J. & Lindquist, K. A. Women’s bodies emerge on the shoreline between biology and culture. Aeon https://aeon.co/essays/womens-bodies-emerge-on-the-shoreline-between-biology-and-culture (2021).

  102. Hochman, A. Replacing race: interactive constructionism about racialized groups. Ergo https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.12405314.0004.003 (2017).

  103. Saldanha, A. Reontologising race: the machinic geography of phenotype. Env. Plan. D 24, 9–24 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Rosa, J. & Flores, N. Unsettling race and language: toward a raciolinguistic perspective. Lang. Soc. 46, 621–647 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Wolfe, P. Traces of History: Elementary Structures Of Race (Verso, 2016).

  106. Price-Robertson, R. & Duff, C. Realism, materialism, and the assemblage: thinking psychologically with Manuel DeLanda. Theory Psychol. 26, 58–76 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Weheliye, A. G. Habeas Viscus: Racializing Assemblages, Biopolitics, And Black Feminist Theories of the Human (Duke Univ. Press, 2014).

  108. Brown, S. D. & Lunt, P. A genealogy of the social identity tradition: Deleuze and Guattari and social psychology. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 41, 1–23 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Richeson, J. A. & Sommers, S. R. Toward a social psychology of race and race relations for the twenty-first century. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 67, 439–463 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Cikara, M. Causes and consequences of coalitional cognition. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Vol. 64, (ed. Gawronski, B.) 65–128 (Elsevier, 2021).

  111. Diehl, M. The minimal group paradigm: theoretical explanations and empirical findings. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 1, 263–292 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P. & Flament, C. Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 1, 149–178 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Yamagishi, T. & Kiyonari, T. The group as the container of generalized reciprocity. Soc. Psychol. Q. 63, 116 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Spies, M. & Alff, H. Assemblages and complex adaptive systems: a conceptual crossroads for integrative research? Geogr. Compass 14, e12534 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Thelen, E. & Smith, L. B. A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action (MIT Press, 1994).

  116. Ahmed, S. A phenomenology of whiteness. Feminist Theory 8, 149–168 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. David, E. J. R. Internalized Oppression: The Psychology Of Marginalized Groups (Springer Publishing Company, 2014).

  118. Knowles, E. D., Lowery, B. S., Chow, R. M. & Unzueta, M. M. Deny, distance, or dismantle? How white Americans manage a privileged identity. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 9, 594–609 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Saperstein, A. & Penner, A. M. Racial fluidity and inequality in the United States. Am. J. Sociol. 118, 676–727 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Penner, A. M. & Saperstein, A. How social status shapes race. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 19628–19630 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. Egan, P. J. Identity as dependent variable: how Americans shift their identities to align with their politics. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 64, 699–716 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Jefferson, H. Storming the U.S. Capitol was about maintaining white power in America. FiveThirtyEight https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/storming-the-u-s-capitol-was-about-maintaining-white-power-in-america/ (2021).

  123. Hurston, Z. N. How it feels to be colored me. World Tomorrow 11, 215–216 (1928).

    Google Scholar 

  124. Syed, M. It’s 2 × 2 designs all the way down: social psychology’s over-reliance on experiments needlessly restricts diversity in the field. Preprint at OSF Preprints https://osf.io/u89e2 (2021).

  125. Falandays, J. B. Shedding our substantial baggage: towards a process-ontological turn in cognitive science. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://psyarxiv.com/zyq9f (2021).

  126. Sampson, T. D. The Assemblage Brain: Sense Making in Neuroculture (Univ. Minnesota Press, 2017).

  127. Köhne, A. C. J. The relationalist turn in understanding mental disorders: from essentialism to embracing dynamic and complex relations. Phil. Psychiat. Psychol. 27, 119–140 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Nichterlein, M. Putting the Deleuzian machine to work in psychology: critical and clinical becomings. Annu. Rev. Crit. Psychol. 14, 7–17 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  129. Hatzenbuehler, M. L. Structural stigma: research evidence and implications for psychological science. Am. Psychol. 71, 742–751 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. Major, B., Mendes, W. B. & Dovidio, J. F. Intergroup relations and health disparities: a social psychological perspective. Health Psychol. 32, 514–524 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. Meyer, I. H. Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychol. Bull. 129, 674–697 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  132. Grosz, E. A thousand tiny sexes: feminism and rhizomatics. Topoi 12, 167–179 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Clark, N. & Yusoff, K. Geosocial formations and the anthropocene. Theory Cult. Soc. 34, 3–23 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. Puar, J. K. Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times (Duke Univ. Press, 2017).

  135. Wiertz, T. Biopolitics of migration: an assemblage approach. Environ. Plan. C 39, 1375–1388 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  136. DeLanda, M. The new materiality. Archit. Des. 85, 16–21 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  137. Fox, N. J. & Alldred, P. New materialist social inquiry: designs, methods and the research-assemblage. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 18, 399–414 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Fox, N. J. & Alldred, P. Inside the research-assemblage: new materialism and the micropolitics of social inquiry. Sociol. Res. Online 20, 122–140 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Fox, N. J. & Alldred, P. Doing new materialist data analysis: a Spinozo-Deleuzian ethological toolkit. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. Theory Pract. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1933070 (2021).

  140. Latour, B. Reassembling The Social: An Introduction To Actor-Network-Theory (Oxford Univ. Press, 2005).

  141. Xiao, Y. J., Coppin, G. & Van Bavel, J. J. Perceiving the world through group-colored glasses: a perceptual model of intergroup relations. Psychol. Inq. 27, 255–274 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Coppin, G. et al. Swiss identity smells like chocolate: social identity shapes olfactory judgments. Sci. Rep. 6, 34979 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  143. Mohai, P. & Bryant, B. Is there a ‘race’ effect on concern for environmental quality? Public. Opin. Q. 62, 475 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  144. Song, H. et al. What counts as an “environmental” issue? Differences in issue conceptualization by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. J. Environ. Psychol. 68, 101404 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. Lewis, N. A., Green, D. J., Duker, A. & Onyeador, I. N. Not seeing eye to eye: challenges to building ethnically and economically diverse environmental coalitions. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 42, 60–64 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. Thomas, A. J., Woo, B., Nettle, D., Spelke, E. & Saxe, R. Early concepts of intimacy: young humans use saliva sharing to infer close relationships. Science 375, 311–315 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Fiske, A. P. The four elementary forms of sociality: framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychol. Rev. 99, 689–723 (1992).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Rai, T. S. & Fiske, A. P. Moral psychology is relationship regulation: moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. Psychol. Rev. 118, 57–75 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. Pinker, S., Nowak, M. A. & Lee, J. J. The logic of indirect speech. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 833–838 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  150. Roccas, S. & McCauley, C. Values and emotions in the relational models. In Relational Models Theory: a Contemporary Overview (ed. Haslam, N.) 263–285 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004).

  151. Asch, S. E. Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychol. Monogr. Gen. Appl. 70, 1–70 (1956).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  152. Schein, C. The importance of context in moral judgments. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 15, 207–215 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Earp, B. D., McLoughlin, K. L., Monrad, J. T., Clark, M. S. & Crockett, M. J. How social relationships shape moral wrongness judgments. Nat. Commun. 12, 5776 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  154. Weidman, A. C., Sowden, W. J., Berg, M. K. & Kross, E. Punish or protect? How close relationships shape responses to moral violations. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 46, 693–708 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Gaither, S. E., Apfelbaum, E. P., Birnbaum, H. J., Babbitt, L. G. & Sommers, S. R. Mere membership in racially diverse groups reduces conformity. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 9, 402–410 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  156. Yudkin, D. A., Gantman, A. P., Hofmann, W. & Quoidbach, J. Binding moral values gain importance in the presence of close others. Nat. Commun. 12, 2718 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  157. Niedenthal, P. M., Rychlowska, M., Wood, A. & Zhao, F. Heterogeneity of long-history migration predicts smiling, laughter and positive emotion across the globe and within the United States. PLoS ONE 13, e0197651 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  158. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P. & Xu, J. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 82, 878–902 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. Schlueter, E. & Scheepers, P. The relationship between outgroup size and anti-outgroup attitudes: a theoretical synthesis and empirical test of group threat- and intergroup contact theory. Soc. Sci. Res. 39, 285–295 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  160. Cikara, M., Fouka, V. & Tabellini, M. Hate crime towards minoritized groups increases as they increase in sized-based rank. Nat. Hum. Behav. (in the press).

  161. Rentfrow, P. J. & Jokela, M. Geographical psychology: the spatial organization of psychological phenomena. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 25, 393–398 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  162. Di Masso, A. Grounding citizenship: toward a political psychology of public space: grounding citizenship. Polit. Psychol. 33, 123–143 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  163. Enos, R. D. The Space Between Us: Social Geography And Politics (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2017).

  164. Hopkins, N. & Dixon, J. Space, place, and identity: issues for political psychology. Polit. Psychol. 27, 173–185 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  165. Van Lange, P. A. M., Rinderu, M. I. & Bushman, B. J. Aggression and violence around the world: a model of climate, aggression, and self-control in humans (CLASH). Behav. Brain Sci. 40, e75 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  166. Berman, M. G., Cardenas-Iniguez, C. & Meidenbauer, K. L. An environmental neuroscience perspective on the benefits of nature. In Nature and Psychology Vol. 67 (eds Schutte, A. R., Torquati, J. C. & Stevens, J. R.) 61–88 (Springer International Publishing, 2021).

  167. Gosling, S. D., Gifford, R. & McCunn, L. The selection, creation, and perception of interior spaces: an environmental psychology approach. In The Handbook Of Interior Architecture And Design (eds Brooker, G. & Weinthal, L.) 278–290 (Bloomsbury Visual Arts, 2013).

  168. Bonam, C. M., Taylor, V. J. & Yantis, C. Racialized physical space as cultural product. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Compass 11, e12340 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  169. Freeman, J. B., Penner, A. M., Saperstein, A., Scheutz, M. & Ambady, N. Looking the part: social status cues shape race perception. PLoS ONE 6, e25107–e25107 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  170. Gantman, A. P. & Paluck, E. L. A behavioral science framework for understanding college campus sexual assault. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211030264 (2021).

  171. Grzanka, P. R. & Miles, J. R. The problem with the phrase “intersecting identities”: LGBT affirmative therapy, intersectionality, and neoliberalism. Sex. Res. Soc. Policy 13, 371–389 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  172. Trawalter, S., Bart-Plange, D.-J. & Hoffman, K. M. A socioecological psychology of racism: making structures and history more visible. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 32, 47–51 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  173. Butler, J. Gender Trouble: Feminism And The Subversion Of Identity (Routledge, 2006).

  174. Foucault, M. The History of Sexuality Vol. 1 An Introduction (Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, 2012).

  175. Lamont, M., Adler, L., Park, B. Y. & Xiang, X. Bridging cultural sociology and cognitive psychology in three contemporary research programmes. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 866–872 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  176. Payne, B. K. & Hannay, J. W. Implicit bias reflects systemic racism. Trends Cogn. Sci. 25, 927–936 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  177. Riggs, D. W. & Augoustinos, M. The psychic life of colonial power: racialised subjectivities, bodies and methods. J. Community. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 15, 461–477 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  178. Archarya, A., Blackwell, M. & Sen, M. The political legacy of American slavery. J. Polit. 78, 44–44 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  179. Payne, B. K., Vuletich, H. A. & Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L. Historical roots of implicit bias in slavery. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 11693–11698 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  180. Ofosu, E. K., Chambers, M. K., Chen, J. M. & Hehman, E. Same-sex marriage legalization associated with reduced implicit and explicit antigay bias. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 8846–8851 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  181. Tankard, M. E. & Paluck, E. L. The effect of a Supreme Court decision regarding gay marriage on social norms and personal attitudes. Psychol. Sci. 28, 1334–1344 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  182. Spruill, M. & Lewis, N. A. Legal descriptions of police officers affect how citizens judge them. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 101, 104306 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  183. Martinez, J. E., Feldman, L. A., Feldman, M. J. & Cikara, M. Narratives shape cognitive representations of immigrants and immigration-policy preferences. Psychol. Sci. 32, 135–152 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  184. Martinez, J. E., Oh, D. & Todorov, A. Mental representations of immigrants encode racialized expectations of socio-structural positions. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://psyarxiv.com/cvhze (2021).

  185. Ferguson, M., Mann, T. C. & Wojnowicz, M. T. Rethinking duality: criticisms and ways forward. In Dual-process Theories of the Social Mind (eds Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B. & Trope, Y.) 578–594 (The Guilford Press, 2014).

  186. Barrett, L. F. Are emotions natural kinds? Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 1, 28–58 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  187. Yarkoni, T. The generalizability crisis. Behav. Brain Sci. 45, e1 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  188. Shelton, J. N. A reconceptualization of how we study issues of racial prejudice. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 4, 374–390 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  189. Gaither, S. E. Can diverse populations be considered mainstream science? Psychology Today https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/different-identities-different-perspectives/202003/can-diverse-populations-be-considered (2020).

  190. Saab, R., Ayanian, A. H. & Hawi, D. R. The status of Arabic social psychology: a review of 21st-century research articles. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 11, 917–927 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  191. Mejía, S. T. et al. Assessment of cognitive-motor performance costs, task prioritization, and adaptation to dishwashing under increased demand in older women with arthritis. Innov. Aging 5, igaa059 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  192. Gottwald, S. & Stedman, R. C. Preserving one’s meaningful place or not? Understanding environmental stewardship behaviour in river landscapes. Landsc. Urban. Plan. 198, 103778 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  193. Yudkin, D. A., Stolier, R. M. & Lewis, N. A. Changing perceptions around nontraditional career trajectories in psychological science. Trends Cogn. Sci. 25, 417–418 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  194. Momennejad, I. Collective minds: social network topology shapes collective cognition. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 377, 20200315 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  195. Luce, R. D. Individual Choice Behavior (John Wiley, 1959).

  196. Sen, A. K. Choice functions and revealed preference. Rev. Econ. Stud. 38, 307–317 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  197. Huber, J., Payne, J. W. & Puto, C. Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. J. Consum. Res. 9, 90–98 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  198. Simonson, I. Choice based on reasons: the case of attraction and compromise effects. J. Consum. Res. 16, 158–174 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  199. Pettibone, J. C. & Wedell, D. H. Examining models of nondominated decoy effects across judgment and choice. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 81, 300–328 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  200. Brandt, M. J. & Crawford, J. T. Studying a heterogeneous array of target groups can help us understand prejudice. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 28, 292–298 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  201. Chang, L. W. & Cikara, M. Social decoys: leveraging choice architecture to alter social preferences. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 115, 206–223 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  202. Bhui, R. & Gershman, S. J. Decision by sampling implements efficient coding of psychoeconomic functions. Psychol. Rev. 125, 985–1001 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  203. Louie, K., Khaw, M. W. & Glimcher, P. W. Normalization is a general neural mechanism for context-dependent decision making. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 6139–6144 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  204. Todorov, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Goren, A. & Hall, C. C. Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science 308, 1623–1626 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  205. Chang, L. W., Gershman, S. J. & Cikara, M. Comparing value coding models of context-dependence in social choice. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 85, 103847 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  206. Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A. & McGarty, C. Self and collective: cognition and social context. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 20, 454–463 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  207. Brewer, M. B. The social self: on being the same and different at the same time. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 17, 475–482 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  208. Lau, T., Pouncy, H. T., Gershman, S. J. & Cikara, M. Discovering social groups via latent structure learning. J. Exp. Psychol. 147, 1881–1891 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  209. Cokley, K. & Garba, R. Speaking truth to power: how Black/African psychology changed the discipline of psychology. J. Black Psychol. 44, 695–721 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  210. Miller, A. L., Stern, C. & Neville, H. Forging diversity-science-informed guidelines for research on race and racism in psychological science. J. Soc. Issues 75, 1240–1261 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  211. Hegarty, P. Gentlemen’s Disagreement: Alfred Kinsey, Lewis Terman, And The Sexual Politics Of Smart Men (Univ. Chicago Press, 2013).

  212. Pettit, M. Subject matter: human behavior, psychological expertise, and therapeutic lives. Soc. Stud. Sci. 45, 146–158 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  213. Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T. & Glick, P. The BIAS map: behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 92, 631–648 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  214. Rose, E. K. A constructivist perspective on empirical discrimination research. Preprint at https://ekrose.github.io/files/constructivism.pdf (2022).

  215. Bohren, J. A., Hull, P. & Imas, A. Systemic discrimination: theory and measurement. Preprint at http://www.nber.org/papers/w29820.pdf (2022).

  216. Graetz, N., Boen, C. E. & Esposito, M. H. Structural racism and quantitative causal inference: a life course mediation framework for decomposing racial health disparities. J. Health Soc. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221465211066108 (2022).

  217. Bryan, C. J., Tipton, E. & Yeager, D. S. Behavioural science is unlikely to change the world without a heterogeneity revolution. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 980–989 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  218. Smith, P. L. & Little, D. R. Small is beautiful: in defense of the small-N design. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 25, 2083–2101 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the National Science Foundation (CAREER award BCS-1653188 and BCS-2116543 awarded to M.C.), the Wojcicki-Troper Harvard Data Science Initiative postdoctoral fellowship fund (to J.E.M.) and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (grant 77117 to N.A.L.) for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors contributed equally to all aspects of the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mina Cikara.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Psychology thanks Cameron Brick, Jessica Remedios and Jerry Rosiek for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cikara, M., Martinez, J.E. & Lewis, N.A. Moving beyond social categories by incorporating context in social psychological theory. Nat Rev Psychol 1, 537–549 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00079-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00079-3

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing