Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Diversifying collaboration networks to increase equity in psychology

Insular collaboration networks contribute to inequities in academic psychology by concentrating resources and reputation among members of majority groups. By actively diversifying their networks, researchers can improve their science and reduce inequity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it


Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Odic, D. & Wojcik, E. H. The publication gender gap in psychology. Am. Psychol. 75, 92–103 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ceci, S. J., Ginther, D. K., Kahn, S. & Williams, W. M. Women in academic science: a changing landscape. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 15, 75–141 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Roberts, S. O., Bareket-Shavit, C., Dollins, F. A., Goldie, P. D. & Mortenson, E. Racial inequality in psychological research: trends of the past and recommendations for the future. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 15, 1295–1309 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yerbury, J. J. & Yerbury, R. M. Disabled in academia: to be or not to be, that is the question. Trends Neurosci. 44, 507–509 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Eaton, A. A., Saunders, J. F., Jacobson, R. K. & West, K. How gender and race stereotypes impact the advancement of scholars in STEM: professors’ biased evaluations of physics and biology post-doctoral candidates. Sex Roles 82, 127–141 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gruber, J. et al. The future of women in psychological science. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 16, 483–516 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Piocuda, J. E., Smyers, J. O., Knyshev, E., Harris, R. J. & Rai, M. Trends of internationalization and collaboration in U.S. psychology journals 1950–2010. Arch. Sci. Psychol. 3, 82–92 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Joseph, T. D. & Hirshfield, L. E. ‘Why don’t you get somebody new to do it?’ Race and cultural taxation in the academy. Ethn. Racial Stud. 34, 121–141 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hofstra, B. et al. The diversity–innovation paradox in science. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 9284–9291 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheplygina, V., Hermans, F., Albers, C., Bielczyk, N. & Smeets, I. Ten simple rules for getting started on Twitter as a scientist. PLOS Computat. Biol. 16, e1007513 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The author thanks D. Vuvan for feedback on a previous version of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erica Hsiung Wojcik.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wojcik, E.H. Diversifying collaboration networks to increase equity in psychology. Nat Rev Psychol 1, 9–10 (2022).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing