Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Digital twins in mechanical and aerospace engineering

Abstract

Digital twins bring value to mechanical and aerospace systems by speeding up development, reducing risk, predicting issues and reducing sustainment costs. Realizing these benefits at scale requires a structured and intentional approach to digital twin conception, design, development, operation and sustainment. To bring maximal value, a digital twin does not need to be an exquisite virtual replica but instead must be envisioned to be fit for purpose, where the determination of fitness depends on the capability needs and the cost–benefit trade-offs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The elements of a digital twin.
Fig. 2: The digital twin life cycle.
Fig. 3: Digital twin trade-offs.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AIAA Digital Engineering Integration Committee Digital Twin: Definition and Value AIAA and AIA Position Paper (AIAA, 2020).

  2. Foundational Research Gaps and Future Directions for Digital Twins Consensus Study Report (NASEM, 2023).

  3. Tao, F., Zhang, H. & Zhang, C. Advancements and challenges of digital twins in industry. Nat. Comput. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-024-00603-w (2024).

  4. Trimble, S. Digital twin helps Pratt expand F119 performance for F-22. Aviation Week and Space Technology (3 October 2022).

  5. NRC Assessing the Reliability of Complex Models: Mathematical and Statistical Foundations of Verification, Validation, and Uncertainty Quantification (National Academies Press, 2012).

  6. AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Committee Guide for the Verification and Validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations (AIAA, 1998).

  7. Karniadakis, G. E. et al. Physics-informed machine learning. Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 422–440 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Peherstorfer, B. & Willcox, K. Data-driven operator inference for nonintrusive projection-based model reduction. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 306, 196–215 (2016).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghattas, O. & Willcox, K. Learning physics-based models from data: perspectives from inverse problems and model reduction. Acta Numer. 30, 445–554 (2021).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Brunton, S. L., Proctor, J. L. & Kutz, J. N. Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 3932–3937 (2016).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Baker, N. et al. Workshop Report on Basic Research Needs for Scientific Machine Learning: Core Technologies for Artificial Intelligence (US DOE Office of Science, 2019).

  12. Kapteyn, M. G., Pretorius, J. & Willcox, K. A probabilistic graphical model foundation for enabling predictive digital twins at scale. Nat. Comput. Sci. 1, 337–347 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Verification, Validation, and Uncertainty Quantification Terminology in Computational Modeling and Simulation Standard (ASME, 2022).

Download references

Acknowledgements

K.W. acknowledges support from Department of Energy grant DE-SC0021239 and Air Force Office of Scientific Research grants FA9550-21-1-0084 and FA9550-22-1-0419.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Both authors contributed to the conception, writing and editing of this paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Willcox.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

A.F. is part of RTX, an aerospace and defense enterprise company. K.W. declares no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Computational Science thanks Kristi Morgansen and Omer San for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Fernando Chirigati, in collaboration with the Nature Computational Science team.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferrari, A., Willcox, K. Digital twins in mechanical and aerospace engineering. Nat Comput Sci 4, 178–183 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-024-00613-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-024-00613-8

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics