Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Changes in coupled carbon‒nitrogen dynamics in a tundra ecosystem predate post-1950 regional warming


Arctic ecosystems are changing in response to recent rapid warming, but the synergistic effects of other environmental drivers, such as moisture and atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition, are difficult to discern due to limited monitoring records. Here we use geochemical analyses of 210Pb-dated lake-sediment cores from the North Slope of Alaska to show that changes in landscape nutrient dynamics started over 130 years ago. Lake carbon burial doubled between 1880 and the late-1990s, while current rates (~10 g C m−2 yr−1) represent about half the CO2 emission rate for tundra lakes. Lake C burial reflects increased aquatic production, stimulated initially by nutrients from terrestrial ecosystems due to late-19th century moisture-driven changes in soil microbial processes and, more recently, by atmospheric reactive N deposition. These results highlight the integrated response of Arctic carbon cycling to global environmental stressors and the degree to which C–N linkages were altered prior to post-1950 regional warming.


Terrestrial carbon stores in the Arctic are substantial1 and are mainly held in permafrost2; as such they represent a potential significant feedback into the climate system as soils warm3,4. However, as many key processes (e.g., photosynthesis, soil microbial respiration) in arctic ecosystems are often nitrogen (N) limited5, future alterations to organic carbon (C) pools may be linked to changes in N fluxes6,7, including fixation, cycling, and transfer among adjacent ecosystems8. Recent warming at high latitudes has resulted in deepening of the seasonal active layer and permafrost thawing with an associated increase in mineralisation of organic matter and release of CO2 and CH4 to the atmosphere4. Such warming also alters soil microbial processes, which releases nutrients (especially N9) that stimulate both terrestrial10 and aquatic productivity11, with potentially important consequences for regional rates of C storage.

Future impacts of changing temperature and precipitation on nutrient cycling and ecosystem function are difficult to assess because of the inherent limitations of short-term experimental approaches and the paucity of decadal-scale monitoring records, particularly at high latitudes. Similarly, few studies have evaluated how the coupling between C and N cycles may have shifted in response to past climatic variability12. As lakes are a key component of arctic landscapes and are often net heterotrophic (net ecosystem respiration > primary production)13,14, they may be critical sites to quantify centennial-scale responses of C and N biogeochemistry to climate change. For example, atmospheric warming is expected to increase CO2 efflux from lakes15; however, associated changes in terrestrial C storage and N cycling as well as altered hydrological pathways16 may also alter lateral transfer of terrestrial organic carbon as particulate (POC) and dissolved (DOC) to streams and lakes17, where it may be either stored in sediments14 or released to the atmosphere following bacterial respiration or photochemical mineralisation18,19. The degree to which these processes offset each other are poorly constrained17,20, in part because of complex changes in mobilisation and interaction of C and N as permafrost thaws21.

The landscapes of the North Slope of Alaska are now undergoing pronounced permafrost thaw (deepening of the active layer), altered seasonality, and declining snow cover22,23. While atmospheric temperatures have increased terrestrial productivity, warming soils have enhanced soil microbial activity and respiration thereby elevating CO2 and CH4 release4. At the same time soil N dynamics24, shrub expansion (greening)25, thermokarst, and soil erosion are all changing in complex manners22. These terrestrial processes have cascading effects on lakes and wetlands14, which are important landscape components for both C processing and storage18,26,27.

Here, we use whole-basin organic C burial rates and stable isotope analyses of C and N (δ13C; δ15N) in 210Pb-dated sediment cores (see Supplementary Fig. 1) to quantify how historic climate variation has altered coupled C and N cycles in five lakes located near the Toolik Lake Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) Field Station in the Kuparuk River Basin, Alaska, USA28 (Table 1). Data from these sediment records (see Supplementary Data #1) provide an integrated record of lake and catchment nutrient dynamics over the last ~200 years, and show that a combination of changing moisture availability, climate warming, and reactive N deposition over the past 130 years has increased aquatic production and aquatic C burial regionally. Importantly, changes to lake and catchment nutrient cycling were initiated in the late-nineteenth century by a post-Little Ice Age climatic rebound29 well before the rapid and more widely recognised post-1950s warming.

Table 1 Physicochemical characteristics of the study lakes.

Results and discussion

Aquatic and sediment carbon dynamics

Sediment records from the five study lakes show that mean regional C burial rates slowly increased from ~4 g C m−2 yr−1 in the nineteenth century, more than doubling by the 1990s (Fig. 1c). Both rates and trends over time are markedly similar across all sites (Supplementary Fig. 2). The background burial rates (~4 g C m−2 yr−1) characterise the natural C sequestration rate for lakes situated in moist, acidic tussock tundra, while present-day rates (~10–12 g C m−2 yr−1) represent nearly 50% of total C emissions from freshwater lakes in this region (~24 g C m−2 yr−1)18. Most importantly, burial rates increased substantially during a period of 100 years.

Fig. 1: Drivers of ecosystem change and environmental response in five lakes on the Alaskan North Slope.
figure 1

Environmental drivers: a Modelled temperature anomalies for the Arctic (blue filled circles)29 and measured mean annual temperature at Barrow (open brown circles)69. b Changes in nitrogen stocks in terrestrial ecosystem and soils at the Toolik LTER modelled by McKane et al.47 (solid lines); and changes in nitrate concentrations measured in a Greenland ice core70 (green filled circles). Limnological response: c Mean lake-wide carbon burial in the five study lakes integrated by decade (grey fill); and z-scores for carbon: nitrogen ratios (open squares) and carbon isotopic composition (filled black circles) in master cores from the same five lakes. Fitted trend lines and 95% confidence intervals (shading) from a general additive model (GAM). d z-scores for biogenic silica (BSi) (open circles) and axis-1 scores from a PCA ordination of fossil diatom assemblages (green filled circles) for cores from two of the study lakes. Fitted lines and confidence intervals from GAMs. e z-scores for nitrogen isotopes in cores with increasing (Perfect, Forgetful; blue symbols) and decreasing (Surprise, Relaxing; red symbols) trends. GAM trend lines and confidence intervals as in Panels c and d. For the environmental response variables in the sediment-core records, two time-lines of major ecological change (vertical lines), the first beginning around 1880 (carbon burial and stable isotopes) and the second ~1970 (diatoms and biogenic Si) are based on breakpoint analysis (see “Methods” and Supplementary information).

There is also clear sedimentary evidence that the increased C burial rates arose mainly from enhanced in-lake production, driven by changes in lake catchment nutrient cycling and increased N influx. Present-day sediment C/N ratios across all sites are <15 and δ13C values are around –30‰, both of which are essentially algal signatures30 and substantially lower than corresponding values for tussock peat or catchment runoff (Fig. 2a). In addition, the temporal trends in the sediment δ13C data are broadly similar (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 2b) and suggest that aquatic primary producers used CO2 respired from terrestrially fixed C rather than atmospheric CO213. This process is recognised as being important today19, but the δ13C profiles suggest that C dynamics started to change from ~1880 (Breakpoint = 1877; see “Methods” and Supplementary Fig. 3 for summary of breakpoint analyses). Algal communities—as summarised by PCA axis-1 scores of fossil diatom assemblages (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Figs. 2e and 4)—also began to shift in the late 1800s, followed by even more marked changes in the late-1960s (Breakpoint 1968). These trends are matched by accumulation rates of biogenic silica (BSi) (first breakpoint 1926; second 1978) (Fig. 1d), consistent with the overall increase in algal production inferred from the carbon proxies (C burial, C/N, and δ 13C).

Fig. 2: Contemporary aquatic biogeochemistry.
figure 2

a A comparison of carbon isotopic composition and carbon: nitrogen ratios in modern (core-top) sediment from the five study lakes with tussock peat (moss) and runoff water samples from the Toolik Lake catchment; and b a comparison of the change in sediment N concentrations with the change in nitrogen-isotopic composition between the nineteenth century (1800–1880) and the last 2 decades represented in the cores (1980–2000). The capital letters refer to the first letter of the five study lake names.

As the study lakes are shallow (mean depths = 2.7–4.9 m) and relatively clear (light attenuation, Ka = 0.33–0.75 m−1) (Table 1), autotrophic production is dominated by benthic algae31,32. This conclusion is supported by related studies of nearby lakes, where benthic diatoms together with Nitella and mosses contributed substantially to whole-lake metabolism33. Whole-lake (pelagic + benthic) production estimates in these lakes ranged from 4 to 20 g C m−2 yr−1 (ref. 18).

Given that the organic sediment in our study lakes is predominantly autochthonous in origin (see ref. 34 for a discussion of the effect of benthic algae on isotopic signatures; see also Fig. 2a), the observed increases in C burial strongly imply greater aquatic production, which in turn requires increased nutrient input. Lakes in the Kuparuk Basin are generally N-limited35, and nitrogen plays a central role in both terrestrial and aquatic productivity, as well as controlling community structure in this region36.

When interpreting sediment-core profiles, it is important, however, to recognise that their recent organic matter content is influenced to varying degrees by post-depositional diagenesis. Sediment C/N ratios initially reflect differential mineralisation rates, but as shown by Galman et al.37 C/N profiles stabilise very quickly, within 10 years or so. Therefore, the emphasis here has been placed on longer-term changes. Bulk sedimentation rates have also increased (see ref. 38), which tends to counter diagenetic effects due to more rapid burial of organic matter. Furthermore, using a multi-proxy approach serves to emphasise the ecological signal as opposed to diagenetic noise. Similarly, the range of morphometries and water chemistry of the 5 lakes compared to the coherence of the geochemical response suggests that diagenesis is not the main process driving the sediment records. We therefore contend that the change in carbon burial in our study lakes is linked closely to changes in N dynamics in catchment soils, as well as inputs of reactive atmospheric N (Nr).

Nitrogen biogeochemistry

The change in sediment N-isotopic signatures (δ15N) (Fig. 1e) also began in the late-nineteenth century (Breakpoint = 1847–1878; Supplementary Fig. 3), which is temporally consistent with increased N loading to area lakes as reflected in the increased C accumulation rates, δ13C, and lake productivity indicators (Fig. 1c, d and Supplementary Fig. 2). As δ15N of bulk organic matter records complex changes in N fluxes from multiple sources as well as changes in N cycling, the direction and magnitude of the δ15N trends vary considerably among our five lakes (Supplementary Fig. 2d). Specifically, two records show enrichment with 15N (Perfect, Forgetful), one (Efficient) changes little, while two (Surprise, Relaxing) exhibit declining δ15N (Fig. 1e). Although the latter pattern is consistent with an influx of isotopically depleted Nr from the atmosphere39, alternate patterns in these and other regional lakes40,41 demonstrate that N cycling is unlikely to be driven purely by atmospherically-derived N. The δ15N trends are unrelated in any significant way (Pearson’s r = −0.48 to 0.57 with all p-values > 0.32) to physicochemical characteristics of the study lakes (Table 1), indicating importance of the differences in catchment N sources and in-lake N fractionation processes. Consistent with this interpretation, we note that baseline (~1800) δ15N values vary from sources characteristic of recently fixed N2 (~0 ‰) to those in which terrestrial N is subject to intense recycling (~4 ‰)42.

That said, we note a striking pattern in the study lakes between the relative increase in sediment N content and the change in δ15N between the nineteenth century (1800–1880) and the last two decades represented in the cores (1980–2000). The lake cores with the largest increase in sediment N (∆N) (Perfect, Forgetful) show a positive shift in δ15N, while the lakes with the smallest increase in ∆N (Relaxing, Surprise) exhibit a negative shift in δ15N over time (Fig. 2b). Although the exact mechanism(s) for this strong relationship (r2 = 0.93) are uncertain, it suggests either differences in N-limitation (greater in lakes with the largest N increases) or in-lake N processing including N-fixation (greater in lakes with the smallest N increases), which is known to be important in Toolik area lakes32. Possible N sources are atmospheric Nr inputs as indicated elsewhere in the Arctic39,43 (Fig. 1b), and perhaps, most importantly in moist tundra, lateral transfer of mineralised-N released from thawing soils9,24. Permafrost thaw may also increase export of terrestrial P to lakes, a process that is important to offset the P-limitation of primary production imposed by increased N influx.

Synthesis: coupled terrestrial-aquatic biogeochemistry

There is now unambiguous evidence for widespread environmental change in the Arctic44, especially from studies on the North Slope of Alaska. Greening (shrub expansion), thawing permafrost and increased thermokarst erosion have occurred in association with marked increases in regional air temperature since 197422,45. The temporal disruption of C–N coupling within tundra landscapes, however, is not well constrained at decadal timescales46, such that longer-term evaluation requires a combination of ecosystem models47 and palaeolimnological methods48.

Here, we have identified two main periods of change in regional biogeochemistry and C cycling (Fig. 1b, c): the first starting in the mid- to late-nineteenth century as indicated by rising C burial and declining δ13C values (breakpoint = 1877; Supplementary Fig. 3); and a second beginning in the mid-twentieth century marked by accelerating C and BSi burial and changing algal composition (breakpoints for BSi 1926 and 1978, diatom turnover 1968). These temporal trends in sediment geochemistry are strikingly similar to those predicted by the results of ecosystem modelling47 that showed terrestrial N mineralisation and loss in the Kuparuk Basin increasing after ~1860 due to decreased soil moisture (Fig. 1b; see “Methods”)47. Typically, much of the N released from thawing soils is lost to the atmosphere through denitrification24,49, although some is also exported to streams and lakes where it can increase aquatic productivity50,51, as reflected in the sediment record.

Both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems in the Kuparuk Basin are highly sensitive to environmental forcing50, and our palaeolimnological results suggest that biogeochemical cycling of C and N first began to change in the late-nineteenth century (Fig. 1c, e) well before anthropogenic warming of the atmospheric was substantial. Although a reversal of the circum-Arctic cooling associated with the Little Ice Age (LIA), which spanned the period approximately 1300 to 1850 AD, is well documented, most regional warming occurred after ~195029 (Fig. 1a) due to a combination of human influence and a change in the Pacific Decadal Oscillation in the mid-1970s52. Further, the agreement between the two independent ecological hindcasts—modelled ecosystem N balance47 and sediment geochemical records—suggest that coupled aquatic-terrestrial C–N-dynamics in the Kuparuk Basin began to change in the late-nineteenth century driven by post-LIA changes in ecosystem and soil N processes (Fig. 1b) due to warming and altered soil moisture (see discussion in McKane et al.47). The sediment-core results thus highlight both the protracted nature of ecosystem response to global-change forcing at high latitudes and the importance of a holistic approach to terrestrial-aquatic linkages during the Anthropocene, especially of altered N cycling7,53.


Study sites

Study sites are located on the North Slope of the Brooks Range in Alaska, USA, in the vicinity of the Toolik Lake LTER Field Station38. The local vegetation is dominated by tussock tundra, and there is continuous permafrost. The study lakes are small (<10 ha) and relatively shallow, with maximum depths of 5–13 m (Table 1). Lake waters are slightly alkaline (pH ~8) and moderately dilute with conductivity ranging from 50 to 200 μS cm−1. DOC ranges from 2.7 to 4.3 ppm. There are no distinct inflow streams, and catchment:lake area ratios are small (1.2 to 4.5). The present-day lake ice-free period in this area is ~3.5 months, and monitoring data at nearby Toolik lake show no trend in either ice-off or ice-on over the last 20 years (

McKane et al.47 suggested that N mineralisation in tundra soils of the North Slope of Alaska is strongly dependent on moisture content. They provide a detailed discussion of the role soil moisture and other factors influence the model results. Much of the nitrogen released from thawing soils is lost from the terrestrial ecosystems through denitrification, and terrestrial uptake is not able to utilise the expanding nutrient pool, such that some portion is transferred laterally (associated with increased hydrological flux) to streams and lakes where it complements atmospheric Nr deposition and in situ fixation thereby increasing aquatic productivity. The latter change is recorded in the lake-sediment record.

Field and laboratory methods

Details of core retrieval and core processing can be found in Fitzgerald et al.38. Briefly, three piston cores from each lake were fully dated using 210Pb and analysed for organic content using standard loss-on-ignition methods54. 210Pb chronologies were determined for the last 150–200 years using the constant rate of supply (c.r.s.) model55 and extrapolated if needed to ca. 1800. 210Pb dating accuracy declines substantially in sediments older than 150 years, but because of very slow sedimentation rates and near-constant supported 210Pb, we were able to calculate dates for most cores back to c. 1800. The uncertainty for these dates is, of course, quite large, as shown in age-depth profiles in the Supplementary Fig. 1.

The dry mass sediment accumulation rate (DMAR, g cm−2 yr−1) was multiplied by the proportional biogenic silica (BSi) and organic matter (OM) content to derive BSi and OM accumulation rates. A correction of 0.46954 was applied to the latter to derive the organic carbon accumulation rate (CAR; g C m−2 yr−1).

Samples of tussock peat (moss) and runoff water were collected from a 1-ha experimental sub-catchment of Toolik Lake in 2016 and analysed for C and N isotopes.

Whole-basin C fluxes

Carbon burial rates derived from single cores are not representative of whole-basin rates due to the problem of sediment focussing56. As multiple cores from each study lake were dated (see above and ref. 38), the cores could be integrated into a whole-basin rate and a focusing correction factor determined for each core. The focusing-corrected CAR were then integrated into decadal intervals and averaged for each lake. Reported modern organic CAR values exclude the most recent decade (1990–2000), which may be biased high by incomplete mineralisation57.

Palaeolimnological proxies

A single, centrally-located core from each of the lakes was analysed for C and N isotopes, represented here in standard delta notation (δ13C and δ15N) relative to standard sources. Two additional proxies, biogenic silica (BSi) and fossil diatoms, were analysed on the central core for two of the lakes with good diatom preservation (Efficient and Perfect). Diatoms were poorly preserved in sediments of the other three lakes and so were not analysed. Biogenic silica content was determined using a timed-course alkaline extraction method58,59. Diatoms were identified and enumerated following standardised methods60, and community composition summarised as the first axis score in a PCA ordination. Stable isotopes were determined at the Institute of Environmental Change and Society, University of Regina, using a ThermoQuest, (F-MAT) Delta PLUS XL mass spectrometer coupled to a Carlo Erba elemental analyser and following Savage et al.61. δ13C values were not corrected for the Suess effect because the in-lake CO2 is mainly derived from recycled terrestrial carbon. The results of the Marine Biological Laboratory General Ecosystem Model (MBL-GEM) was used as an independent estimate of changing nitrogen dynamics in catchment soils and vegetation47.

Statistical analyses

Palaeolimnological data from each lake-sediment-core were transformed to z-scores for the purpose of inter-lake comparison, and the main changes in each proxy were undertaken on the mean z-scores of all lakes for a given variable (Supplementary Fig. 3). The rationale for this approach was that it allows identification of departures from regional trends in the geochemical data through time across all or groups of lakes, while removing lake-specific variability. However, Supplementary Fig. 5a–c show breakpoints estimated on each core individually (untransformed) for those proxies that were z-transformed for the main breakpoint analysis (δ13C, δ15N, and BSi).

Major trends in palaeolimnological proxies were characterised by fitting generalised additive models (GAMs)62 with a thin plate regression spline63. This method allows for non-linear modelling of trends with a formal assessment of uncertainty based on 95% confidence intervals64. To assess major areas of change in the geochemical and biological sediment records, breakpoint analyses were conducted to detect structural deviations from a simple linear regression model through time65. This method determines the optimal segmentation through an algorithm that computes the residual sum of squares for all possible break combinations given the minimum segment size of the time series (set at ~5–7% of the observations, dependent on sample size). Ninety-five percent confidence intervals were calculated for the observations associated with each breakpoint date following Bai and Perron65. GAMs were modelled using the “mgcv” package and breakpoint analyses were conducted using the “strucchange” package in the R Statistical Software62,66,67.

Data availability

The data used in this study are presented in Supplemental Material and available at: (; see ref. 68)


  1. Hugelius, G. et al. Estimated stocks of circumpolar permafrost carbon with quantified uncertainty ranges and identified data gaps. Biogeosciences 11, 6573–6593 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Olefeldt, D. et al. Circumpolar distribution and carbon storage of thermokarst landscapes. Nat. Commun. 7, (2016).

  3. McGuire, A. D. et al. Sensitivity of the carbon cycle in the Arctic to climate change. Ecol. Monogr. 79, 523–555 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Schuur, E. A. G. et al. Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback. Nature 520, 171–179 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chapin, D. M. & Bledsoe, C. S. Nitrogen fixation in Arctic plant communitiesin (eds. Chapin, F. S., Jefferies, R. L., Reynolds, J. F., Shaver, G. R. & Svoboda, J.) Arctic Ecossytems in a changing cliamte: an ecophysiological perspective 1992.

  6. Chapin, F. S. III. et al. The changing global carbon cycle: linking plant-soil carbon dynamics to global consequences. J. Ecol. 97, 840–850 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Elser, J. J. et al. Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 10, 1135–1142 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wookey, P. A. et al. Ecosystem feedbacks and cascade processes: understanding their role in the responses of Arctic and alpine ecosystems to environmental change. Glob. Change Biol. 15, 1153–1172 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Marin-Spiotta, E. et al. Paradigm shifts in soil organic matter research affect interpretations of aquatic carbon cycling: transcending disciplinary and ecosystem boundaries. Biogeochemistry 117, 279–297 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tape, K. D., Hallinger, M., Welker, J. M. & Ruess, R. W. Landscape heterogeneity of shrub expansion in arctic Alaska. Ecosystems 15, 711–724 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Myrstener, M. et al. Persistent nitrogen limitation of stream biofilm communities along climate gradients in the Arctic. Glob Change Biol. 24, 3680–3691 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Salmon, V. G. et al. Nitrogen availability increases in a tundra ecosystem during five years of experimental permafrost thaw. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 1927–1941 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kling, G. W., Kipphut, G. W. & Miller, M. C. Arctic lakes and streams as gas conduits to the atmosphere-implications for tundra carbon budgets. Science 251, 298–301 (1991).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kling, G. W., Kipphut, G. W., Miller, M. M. & O’Brien, W. J. Integration of lakes and streams in a landscape perspective: the importance of material processing on spatial patterns and temporal coherence. Freshwater Biol. 43, 477–497 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. DelSontro, T., Beaulieu, J. J. & Downing, J. A. Greenhouse gas emissions from lakes and impoundments: upscaling in the face of global change. Limnol. Oceanogr. Lett. 3, 64–75 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bring, A. et al. Arctic terrestrial hydrology: A synthesis of processes, regional effects, and research challenges. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 121, 621–649 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tank, S. E. et al. Landscape-level controls on dissolved carbon flux from diverse catchments of the circumboreal. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 26, (2012).

  18. Kling, G. W., Kipphut, G. W. & Miller, M. C. The flux of CO2 and CH4 from lakes and rivers in arctic Alaska. Hydrobiologia 240, 23–36 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cory, R. M., Ward, C. P., Crump, B. C. & Kling, G. W. Sunlight controls water column processing of carbon in arctic fresh waters. Science 345, 925–928 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kortelainen, P. et al. Carbon evasion/accumulation ratio in boreal lakes is linked to nitrogen. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 27, 363–374 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schuur, E. A. G. et al. The effect of permafrost thaw on old carbon release and net carbon exchange from tundra. Nature 459, 556–559 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bowden, W. B. et al. Sediment and nutrient delivery from thermokarst features in the foothills of the North Slope, Alaska: Potential impacts on headwater stream ecosystems. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 113, (2008).

  23. Curtis, J., Wendler, G., Stone, R. & Dutton, E. Precipitation decrease in the western arctic, with special emphasis on Barrow and Barter Island, Alaska. Int. J. Climatol. 18, 1687–1707 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yano, Y., Shaver, G. R., Giblin, A. E., Rastetter, E. B. & Nadelhoffer, K. J. Nitrogen dynamics in a small arctic watershed: retention and downhill movement of N-15. Ecol. Monogr. 80, 331–351 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tape, K., Sturm, M. & Racine, C. The evidence for shrub expansion in Northern Alaska and the Pan-Arctic. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 686–702 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Stackpoole, S. M. et al. Inland waters and their role in the carbon cycle of Alaska. Ecol. Appl. 27, 1403–1420 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tank, S. E. et al. Landscape matters: Predicting the biogeochemical effects of permafrost thaw on aquatic networks with a state factor approach. Permafr. Periglac. Process. 31, 358–370 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hobbie, J. E. & Kling, G. W. Alaska’s Changing Arctic: Ecological Consequences for Tundra, Streams, and Lakes. (Oxford University Press, 2014).

  29. Kaufman, D. S. et al. Recent warming reverses long-term Arctic cooling. Science 325, 1236–1239 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Meyers, P. A. & Ishiwatari, R. Lacustrine organic geochemistry-an overview of indicators of organic matter sources and diagenesis in lake sediments. Organ. Geochem. 20, 867–900 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vadeboncoeur, Y. et al. From Greenland to green lakes: cultural eutrophication and the loss of benthic pathways in lakes. Limnol. Oceanogr. 48, 1408–1418 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gettel, G. M., Giblin, A. E. & Howarth, R. W. Controls of benthic nitrogen fixation and primary production from nutrient enrichment of oligotrophic, Arctic lakes. Ecosystems 16, 1550–1564 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cornwell, J. C. & Banahan, S. A silicon budget for an alaskan arctic lake. Hydrobiologia 240, 37–44 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. France, R. L. C-13 enrichment in benthic compared to planktonic algae-foodweb implications. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 124, 307–312 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Levine, M. A. & Whalen, S. C. Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton production in Alaskan Arctic foothill lakes. Hydrobiologia 455, 189–201 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hobbie, S. E., Schimel, J. P., Trumbore, S. E. & Randerson, J. R. Controls over carbon storage and turnover in high-latitude soils. Glob. Change Biol. 6, 196–210 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Galman, V., Rydberg, J., de-Luna, S. S., Bindler, R. & Renberg, I. Carbon and nitrogen loss rates during aging of lake sediment: changes over 27 years studied in varved lake sediment. Limnol. Oceanogr. 53, 1076–1082 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fitzgerald, W. F. et al. Modern and historic atmospheric mercury fluxes in northern Alaska: Global sources and Arctic depletion. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39, 557–568 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Holtgrieve, G. W. et al. A coherent signature of anthropogenic nitrogen deposition to remote watersheds of the northern hemisphere. Science 334, 1545–1548 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hobbs, W. O. et al. Nitrogen deposition to lakes in national parks of the western Great Lakes region: Isotopic signatures, watershed retention, and algal shifts. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 30, 514–533 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Anderson, N. J. et al. Regional variability in the atmospheric nitrogen deposition signal and its transfer to the sediment record in Greenland lakes. Limnol. Oceanogr. 63, 2250–2265 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Brock, C. S., Leavitt, P. R., Schindler, D. E., Johnson, S. P. & Moore, J. W. Spatial variability of stable isotopes and fossil pigments in surface sediments of Alaskan coastal lakes: Constraints on quantitative estimates of past salmon abundance. Limnol. Oceanogr. 51, 1637–1647 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Curtis, C. J. et al. Spatial variations in snowpack chemistry, isotopic composition of NO3- and nitrogen deposition from the ice sheet margin to the coast of western Greenland. Biogeosciences 15, 529–550 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Post, E. et al. Ecological dynamics across the Arctic associated with recent climate change. Science 325, 1355–1358 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Jones, V. J. et al. The influence of Holocene tree-line advance and retreat on an arctic lake ecosystem: a multi-proxy study from Kharinei Lake, North Eastern European Russia. J. Paleolimnol. 46, 123–137 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kittel, T. G. F., Baker, B. B., Higgins, J. V. & Haney, J. C. Climate vulnerability of ecosystems and landscapes on Alaska’s North Slope. Reg. Environ. Change 11, S249–S264 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. McKane, R. B. et al. Reconstruction and analysis of historical changes in carbon storage in arctic tundra. Ecology 78, 1188–1198 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Leavitt, P. R. et al. Paleolimnological evidence of the effects on lakes of energy and mass transfer from climate and humans. Limnol. Oceanogr. 54, 2330–2348 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Tye, A. M. & Heaton, T. H. E. Chemical and isotopic characteristics of weathering and nitrogen release in non-glacial drainage waters on Arctic tundra. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 71, 4188–4205 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hobbie, J. E. et al. Impact of global change on biogeochemistry and ecosystems of an arctic freshwater system. Polar Res. 18, 207–214 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Whalen, S. C. & Cornwell, J. C. Nitrogen, phosphorus, and organic-carbon cycling in an Arctic lake. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 42, 797–808 (1985).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Mantua, N. J., Hare, S. R., Zhang, Y. & Wallace, J. M. Pacific interdecadal climate oscillation with impacts on salmon production. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 78, 1069–1079 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Galloway, J. N. et al. Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: Recent trends, questions, and potential solutions. Science 320, 889–892 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Dean, W. E. Determination of carbonate and organic-matter in calcareous sediments and sedimentary-rocks by loss on ignition-comparison with other methods. J. Sediment. Petrol. 44, 242–248 (1974).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Appleby, P. G. In Tracking Environmental Change Using Lake Sediments Volume 1: Basin Analysis, Coring, and Chronological Techniques (eds. Last, W. M. & Smol, J. P.) 171–203 (Kluwer, 2001).

  56. Engstrom, D. R. & Rose, N. L. A whole-basin, mass-balance approach to paleolimnology. J. Paleolimnol. 49, 333–347 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Dietz, R. D., Engstrom, D. R. & Anderson, N. J. Patterns and drivers of change in organic carbon burial across a diverse landscape: insights from 116 Minnesota lakes. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 29, 708–727 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. DeMaster, D. J. The supply and accumulation of silica in the marine environment. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 45, 1715–1732 (1981).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Conley, D. J. & Schelske, C. L. In Tracking Environmental Change Using lake Sediments: Biological Methods and Indicators (eds. Smol, J. P., Birks, H. J. B. & Last, W. M.) 281–293 (Kluwer, 2001).

  60. Renberg, I. A procedure for preparing large sets of diatom slides from sediment cores. J. Paleolimnol. 4, 87–90 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Savage, C., Leavitt, P. R. & Elmgren, R. Distribution and retention of effluent nitrogen in surface sediments of a coastal bay. Limnol. Oceanogr. 49, 1503–1511 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Wood, S. N. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R, 2nd edn. (Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2017).

  63. Wood, S. N. Thin-plate regression splines. J. R. Stat. Soc. (B) 65, 95–114 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Simpson, G. L. Modelling palaeoecological time series using generalized additive models. Front. Ecol. Evol. 6, 149 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Bai, J. & Perron, P. Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models. J Appl. Econ. 181, 1–22 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. R Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, (2013).

  67. Zeileis, A., Leisch, F., Hornik, K. & Kleiber, C. strucchange: An R package for testing for structural change in linear regression models. J. Stat. Softw. 7, 1–38 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Anderson, N. J., Engstrom, D. R., Leavitt, P. R., Flood, S. M. & Heathcote, A. J. Mendeley, (2020).

  69. The Alaska Climate Research Center. Climatological Data-Alaska’s Arctic, (2010).

  70. Hastings, M. G., Steig, E. J. & Sigman, D. M. Seasonal variations in N and O isotopes of nitrate in snow at Summit, Greenland: Implications for the study of nitrate in snow and ice cores. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 109, (2004).

  71. Tseng, C.-M., Lamborg, C. H., Fitzgerald, W. F. & Engstrom, D. R. Cycling of dissolved elemental mercury in Arctic Alaskan lakes. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 68, 1173–1184 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are grateful to Bill Fitzgerald (University of Connecticut), Carl Lamborg (University of California, Santa Cruz), Chun-Mao Tseng (Taiwan National University) for help with the core collection and Will Daniels (Brown University) for the water and peat isotope sampling. Jill Coleman Wasik and Erin Mortenson undertook the BSi and 210Pb dating analyses at the SCWRS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



N.J.A. and D.R.E. conceived and designed the study. N.J.A., D.R.E., and A.J.H. processed and analysed the data. P.R.L., N.J.A., S.M.F., and D.R.E. contributed data and interpretation. N.J.A. drafted the manuscript as lead author with significant contributions by all co-authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. John Anderson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Primary handling editor: Joe Aslin

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anderson, N.J., Engstrom, D.R., Leavitt, P.R. et al. Changes in coupled carbon‒nitrogen dynamics in a tundra ecosystem predate post-1950 regional warming. Commun Earth Environ 1, 38 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing