Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Absence of superconductivity in bulk Nd1−xSrxNiO2


Superconductivity at 9–15 K was recently discovered in Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 films. Since the Ni1+ ionic state in NdNiO2 may have the same 3d9 outer-shell electronic orbital as in cuprate superconductors, it is interesting to know whether superconductivity has a similar mechanism in these two systems. Here we synthesize bulk samples of Nd1−xSrxNiO2 (x = 0, 0.2, 0.4) with inhomogeneous Sr distribution and Ni deficiency. Resistivity measurements show insulating behavior without the presence of superconductivity, different to the previously reported films. Although applying pressure up to about 50.2 GPa significantly suppresses the insulating behavior, superconductivity remains absent. The magnetization behavior exhibits a Curie–Weiss law with a paramagnetic moment of about 2 μB/f.u. Since the lattice constants derived from our diffraction data are very close to the previously reported superconducting Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 films, we suggest that superconductivity in that system may have arisen from interface or stress-related effects, or nickel deficiency in our bulk samples that might prevent the emergence of superconductivity.


Since the discovery of high critical temperature superconductivity (HTS) in cuprates in 19861, there are plenty of experimental and theoretical studies to explore the intrinsic mechanism for superconductivity2,3,4,5. There is a general agreement that the parent compound of cuprates like La2CuO4 is a Mott insulator with a charge transfer gap and long-range antiferromagnetic (AF) order6. With chemical doping, the long-range AF order will be suppressed at a hole doping level (p ≈ 0.02) and d-wave superconductivity emerges at a higher doping level (p ≥ 0.05)7,8,9. After the efforts more than three decades, some common features have been observed, but the intrinsic pairing mechanism of HTS remains unresolved yet. These include two-dimensional electronic structure and coexistence with an AF order or spin fluctuations, all these also occur in most iron-based10 and heavy fermion superconductors11. Moreover, in cuprates, it is also important that the spin S = 1/2 magnetic moment from 3d9 electrons forms the basic structure of the AF order. One intuitive way to explore the pairing mechanism of cuprates is to find additional high-TC superconductors with different transition metals but similar crystal and electronic structure12,13. The infinite-layer materials RNiO2 (R = La, Nd) are one of the ideal systems to simulate cuprates. First, the RNiO2 compounds have the same crystal structure (P4/mmm) as CaCuO2, which is a parent compound of high-TC cuprates and can reach a high-TC of about 110 K by hole doping14. Second, the Ni1+(3d9) oxidation state in RNiO2 is very similar to 3d9 configuration of Cu2+ in cuprates. Thus, many theoretical and experimental efforts have been put forward to investigate the RNiO2 as a promising candidate of cuprate-like Ni-based superconductor12,15,16,17.

Recently, superconductivity was observed at 9–15 K in the strontium doped infinite-layer nickelate thin films of Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 deposited on the SrTiO3 substrate18. This work has stimulated enormous interests, and plenty of theoretical works have been carried out19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31. Among them, Zhang et al. propose the parent compound of Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 as a self-doped Mott insulator26. This work suggests that the low-density Nd-5d conduction electrons couple with the localized Ni-3d electrons, which suppresses the long-range AF order and forms Kondo spin singlets at low temperatures. While, Botana and Norman argue that a large ratio of longer-range hopping to near-neighbor hopping is conducive for superconductivity both in cuprates and nickelates20. And Ryee et al. demonstrate that magnetic two-dimensionality induced by hole doping is the key factor for superconducting Nd1−xSrxNiO225. Bernardini et al.31 propose a possible difference between cuprates and nickelates based on the computed London penetration depth, and suggest that the latter does not follow the Uemura plot which holds well in underdoped cuprates. Hirayama et al.30 compare the electronic structure of cuprates and NdNiO2, and conclude that the Nd layer also forms Fermi pockets. And they also propose some other promising compounds analogues to high-TC cuprates. Several other groups also studied the dominant pairing instability in the framework of t–J model23,27. They proposed that superconductivity in nickelates has a d-wave symmetry, which is analogous to cuprates. However, since the report of discovering superconductivity in Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO218 thin films, no other experimental works have been reported up to now.

In this paper, we report the successful synthesis and physical properties of bulk Nd1−xSrxNiO2 (x = 0, 0.2, 0.4) samples. By using a three-step method, we prepare bulk Sr-doped NdNiO2 polycrystalline samples successfully with the similar doped composition of Sr as in the reported films. The structural and composition analyses reveal the formation of bulk Nd1−xSrxNiO2 phase which at this moment has low crystallinity, nickel deficiency, and inhomogeneous strontium distribution. The low crystallinity may be a common feature for the low-temperature topotactic reduction method, which can also be seen in the bulk form NdNiO2 samples32 and the superconducting Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO218 thin film. Magnetization measurements of the sample show a Curie–Weiss (C–W) like feature at high fields (1 and 3 T). The resistivity measurements at ambient and high pressures exhibit insulating behavior without the presence of superconductivity. We think the contradictory results compared with that of the reported films18 may be attributed to the interface or stress effect in films. Furthermore, in our samples, we find appreciable deficiency (5–9%) of Ni in the NiO2 planes. It would be interesting to know whether this feature occurs also in the reported films, which may lead to the absence of superconductivity in our bulk samples.


Sample characterization

Figure 1a shows the schematic crystal structures and the transformation from the 113 to 112 phase through the low-temperature topotactic reduction method. Here Nd/Sr, Ni and oxygen atoms are represented by the orange/purple, green and red spheres, respectively. To verify the formation of bulk Nd1−xSrxNiO2 phase, we conduct the room temperature XRD measurements with from 10° to 90° and the Rietveld refinements33 of Nd1−xSrxNiO2 (x = 0.2, 0.4) bulk samples. The results are shown in Fig. 1b, c. The XRD data of undoped NdNiO2 sample are shown in Supplementary Fig. 1. One can see that the Sr-doped samples have better crystallinity, which may be due to the fact that the valence of Ni in Nd1−xSrxNiO2 (x = 0.2, 0.4) is closer to 2+, and it is known that the Ni2+ state is much more stable than Ni1+. All the samples contain mainly the infinite-layer 112 phase and some amount of extra Ni appears as disconnected segregations. Some peaks of Nd1−xSrxNiO2 seem to be broader than others or have unexpected strong intensities, which may be induced by the disorder in these reflection planes and anisotropic particle size in layered materials. And the low crystallinity is a common feature for the samples fabricated by the low-temperature topotactic reduction method32. From the indices of those peaks as shown in Fig. 1c, it is obvious that the diffraction peaks of the class <hk0> are sharper. And the broader peaks are from the class where l has a nonzero value. It means that the NiO2 plane may be disordered, which is corresponding to the result of the nickel deficiency in present samples as inferred from the EDS measurement. The crystallographic data obtained from the Rietveld refinement profiles are shown in Table 1 and Supplementary Table 1. The lattice constant of c-axis increases with increasing doping contents. The lattice parameters of our bulk sample (x = 0.2) are a = 3.91 Å, c = 3.33 Å, which are in good agreement with the previous reports on the reported Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 thin film18.

Fig. 1: Crystal structure and Rietveld refinement analyses.

a The schematic structure and transformation from perovskite Nd1−xSrxNiO3 to infinite-layer Nd1−xSrxNiO2 by low-temperature reduction process with CaH2. b, c Powder X-ray diffraction patterns of Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 and Nd0.6Sr0.4NiO2 (circles) and Rietveld fitting curves (red lines) to the data. A small impurity peak around 33 degree marked with asterisk (*) in both samples may come from the unreacted (Nd,Sr)2NiO4 phase. The Miller indices of Nd0.6Sr0.4NiO2 sample are given in c.

Table 1 Lattice parameters obtained from the Rietveld refinements.

Figure 2a, b display the scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of Nd1−xSrxNiO2 (x = 0.2, 0.4) samples. As we can see, the grains could be clearly separated into two major morphologies, which are characterized by the argenteous crystals (dominant phase) and dark gray areas. The argenteous grains are interconnected, while the dark gray ones are well separated with each other. In order to have a deeper insight of the difference between the two different grains, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) is used to analyze the element concentration of all three samples. In each sample, we measure more than 20 spots randomly (marked by the red crosses in images of Fig. 2a, b and Supplementary Fig. 1). The results are shown in Fig. 2c–f. As there is uncertainty for the composition of carbon and oxygen, here we only study the contents of Nd, Sr, and Ni. Noting that the starting ratio of Nd/Sr/Ni in Nd1−xSrxNiO2 is stoichiometric when we fabricate the sample. The typical EDS patterns of different samples are given in Fig. 2c, d, we find that the argenteous grains have a composition of Nd1−xSrxNiyO2, while the dark gray grains show a composition of Ni (see Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Note 1). Two typical features can be identified for the Nd1−xSrxNiyO2: (1) The ratio of Ni: (Nd+Sr) is close to 1, although an appreciable deficiency of Ni can be seen from the EDS data. Figure 2e shows the mean value of Ni occupancy normalized by the summed concentration of Nd and Sr. The deficiency of Ni should be in the scale of 5–9% in all three samples (x = 0, 0.2, 0.4). The vacancies in nickel sites may cause the distortion of NiO2 plane and hence result in the shrinkage of the lattice constants of a and b. And the disorder in those reflection planes may induce the peak broadening of XRD. As shown in Supplementary Table 1, the concentration of nickel metal extracted from our XRD data is about 15 wt% for x = 0.2 sample and 17wt% for x = 0.4 sample, which is larger than the observed nickel deficiency in EDS measurement (about 5–9%). The inconsistent content of nickel metal concentration in Rietveld refinement and the observed nickel deficiency in EDS measurement may be induced by the different crystallinity, different grain size as well as the preferred orientation between Ni cluster and grains of Nd1−xSrxNiO2, which make the compositional ratio determined by XRD imprecise. (2) The doped Sr concentrations in Nd1−xSrxNiO2 (x = 0.2, 0.4) samples are close to the nominal values with a clear inhomogeneity of strontium content among grains, which indicates the effective doping level of Sr in our samples. In Fig. 2f, we show the proportion distribution of Sr concentrations, more than half of the grains reach the nominal concentration of Sr. The strontium content for both samples show distributions which are fitted to Gaussian functions. Through the fitting, we find that the average strontium content can be expressed as 0.16 ± 0.04 for x = 0.2 sample and 0.39 ± 0.05 for x = 0.4 sample. Furthermore, for both Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 and Nd0.6Sr0.4NiO2 samples, the proportion of Sr and Ni in different grains all shows a clear distribution around the nominal value, but the concentrations of Sr and Ni on each measured point have no clear correlation (see Supplementary Fig. 3). As we know, the defects and inhomogeneity in transition metal oxides should play an important role in the electronic transport, which have been widely observed in cuprates. For example, by using an X-ray microdiffraction apparatus, scientists found that the superconducting transition temperature and charge-density-wave domain are highly affected by the inhomogeneous oxygen defect order34,35,36. And also in nickelates, by using the similar apparatus on a NdNiO3 film, the paradigm of nanoscale phase inhomogeneity has been extended to the correlated electron system with an AFM ground state37. Thus, we believe the electronic transport in Nd1−xSrxNiO2 system may also be affected by the inhomogeneous distributions of Sr and Ni concentrations. Anyway, we believe our samples contain the right phase of Nd1−xSrxNiyO2 (x = 0.2, 0.4, y ranges from 0.91 to 0.95). The sensitivity of the SQUID instrument should be sufficient to detect the superconducting signal if partial of these grains are superconductive.

Fig. 2: Scanning electron micrograph images and energy dispersive spectroscopy analyses.

a, b SEM images of Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 and Nd0.6Sr0.4NiO2 samples. c, d The typical energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) of the spot 8 in (a) and spot 9 in (b), respectively. e The mean value of occupied ratio of nickel in Nd1−xSrxNiO2 (x = 0, 0.2, 0.4) samples. f The proportion distribution of Sr concentration by measuring EDS on different grains of the samples. A clear inhomogeneity of strontium content is observed. The strontium content can be addressed as 0.16 ± 0.04 for x = 0.2 sample and 0.39 ± 0.05 for x = 0.4 sample from the Gaussian fitting.

Magnetic and Electrical transport properties

Figure 3a–c shows the temperature dependence of magnetic moment (M–T) curves at different external magnetic fields for Nd1−xSrxNiO2 (x = 0, 0.2, 0.4) samples. The magnetic moment of all samples at high fields (μ0 H = 1 T and 3 T) increases with decreasing temperature in the whole temperature range, exhibiting approximately linear behavior at high temperature and a C–W like enhancement at low temperature. It should be noted that the low field (μ0 H = 1 mT) magnetization of all three samples shows a drop of magnetization at about 5 K, together with an obvious irreversibility between the ZFC and FC curves (see Supplementary Fig. 4). Such abnormal behavior at low field magnetization curve may indicate the presence of spin glassy state, probably due to magnetic impurities in compounds. To obtain a deeper understanding of magnetization behavior, we measure the magnetization hysteresis (M–H) curves of the Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 sample at different temperatures and show the data in Fig. 3d. We can safely exclude the possibility that the anomalous drop of magnetization at about 5 K is caused by superconductivity, because no superconducting like M–H curve is observed at 3 K (inset of Fig. 3d). The M–H curves show the presence of paramagnetic background with a ferromagnetic component, and the paramagnetic component decreases as the temperature increases. We think the ferromagnetic component is originated from the segregated phase of Ni. And the paramagnetic behavior is attributed to the Nd1−xSrxNiO2 phase. We have tried to fit the high field M–T curves in low-temperature region by the C–W law \(\chi = \chi _0 + \frac{C}{{T\, +\, T_\theta }}\). The fitting results are given in Fig. 3e, as shown by the red solid line, indicating a good quality of C–W fitting. Through the C–W fitting, we derive the effective magnetic moments μeff of Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 and Nd0.6Sr0.4NiO2, which are about 2.32 μB/f.u. and 2.03 μB/f.u., respectively. It should be noted that, before doing the C–W fitting, we need to remove the ferromagnetic background of nickel from the M–T curves by subtracting the curves of 1 T from those of 3 T. This is valid since the magnetization of Ni gets already saturated at the magnetic fields of 1 T and 3 T, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 5. The subtracted paramagnetic magnetic values \(\chi _P = (M_{3{\rm{T}}} - M_{1{\rm{T}}})/\Delta H\) is thus taken as the pure signal from the paramagnetic term. More details are given in Supplementary Note 2.

Fig. 3: Magnetic properties of Nd1−xSrxNiO2 (x = 0, 0.2, 0.4) samples.

ac Temperature dependence of magnetic moment measured at the fields of 1 and 3 T for NdNiO2, Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 and Nd0.6Sr0.4NiO2 samples. d Magnetization hysteresis loops for Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 sample at different temperatures. Inset shows a linear relation between M with H at low field. e Temperature dependence of \(\left( {\chi _P - \chi _{P0}} \right)^{ - 1}\) in the low-temperature region. The red line shows a linear relation of \(\left( {\chi _P - \chi _{P0}} \right)^{ - 1}\) versus T.

Electrical transport measurements are carried out at ambient pressure in the temperature range from 2 to 300 K. Figure 4a shows the comparison of the temperature dependence of resistivity for Nd1−xSrxNiO2 (x = 0, 0.2, 0.4) samples. It can be clearly seen that the resistivity of the three samples all show insulating behaviors. The inhomogeneous distributions of Sr and Ni concentrations we discussed above may play an important role in electrical transport behavior, but it cannot affect the conclusion that superconductivity is absent in our samples. Assuming partial grains or some fraction of the grains show superconductivity below a certain temperature, the resistivity and magnetization should present a drop. To understand the underlying physics of the electrical transport behavior in present materials, in Fig. 4b we present the ρ (T) curve within the frame of variable range hopping (VRH) model38 described as \(\rho = \rho _0{\rm{exp}}(T_0/T)^{ - 1/4}\), we can see that in a short period of temperature, it gives a linear relationship as highlighted by the red line, while the global fitting is not good. Also the band-gap model (ln ρ 1/T, shown in the bottom-right inset) and resistivity versus log1/T (shown in the top-left inset) are plotted, but all failed to fit the data at ambient pressure, suggesting that the insulating is not originated from the band gap and should possess by itself some exotic scattering reasons. Figure 4c, d shows the magnetic field dependent resistivity measured at different temperatures (T = 2, 5, 10, 20, 50 K). A sizable negative magnetoresistance (MR) \(\Delta \rho /\rho _0 = ( {\rho _H - \rho _0} )/\rho _0\) (about −10% at 5 T) is observed at 2 K. The negative MR at low temperature decreases with the increase of temperature, then the MR shows the crossover from a negative to a small positive MR behavior above 20 K. The negative MR in correlated oxides may be attributed to various mechanisms such as hopping conduction, magnetic scattering, or de-localization effect. As for the positive MR, researchers have proposed that the exchange correlation in different hopping sites (VRH type conduction) could give rise to positive MR39,40. Owing to the nickel segregations in our samples, the origin of negative and positive MR observed in the present compounds is not clear and more works deserve to be done.

Fig. 4: Temperature dependent resistivity and magnetoresistance at ambient pressure.

a Temperature dependence of resistivity for Nd1−xSrxNiO2 (x = 0, 0.2, 0.4) samples. b Temperature dependence of resistivity in ln ρ versus T −1/4 for Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2. The top inset shows the curve of ρ versus log(1/T) and the bottom inset shows the curve of ln ρ versus 1/T (band gap model) for Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2. c, d Field dependence of magnetoresistance Δρ/ρ0 at different temperatures for Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 and Nd0.6Sr0.4NiO2 samples. Both samples exhibit a reversal from negative magnetoresistance to positive magnetoresistance above 20 K.

Resistivity under high pressure

As shown above, an obvious conclusion drawn from the ρ (T) curves at ambient pressure is the insulating behavior. One can see that not only the magnitude of resistivity, but also the insulating features are strongly suppressed by doping more Sr. In order to induce a metallic or even a superconducting state, we also conduct high pressure electrical resistance measurement. The temperature dependence of resistivity at various pressures in Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 and Nd0.6Sr0.4NiO2 samples are shown in Fig. 5a and Supplementary Fig. 6. As discussed above, ρ (T) curves of Nd1−xSrxNiO2 exhibit an insulating behavior at ambient pressure. With application of pressure, the overall magnitude of the resistivity is continuously reduced. The insulating behavior is significantly weakened. The ratio ρ2K/ρ300K of Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 sample is about 350 with the external pressure of 3.2 GPa. With increasing pressure, the magnitude of ρ2K/ρ300K decreases progressively as shown in Fig. 5b. The improvement of conductivity under high pressures may be related to the redistribution of the Sr concentrations and modification of the nickel deficiency within grains. However, to prove this, one may need some microscopic analysis tools, such as synchrotron hard X-ray nanoimaging or small-angle scattering under high pressures, which have been used to reveal a novel micron-scaled ribbon phase in optimally doped Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ41. At the highest pressure of 50.2 GPa, the value of ρ2K/ρ300K has dropped to 6; however the ρ (T) curve still exhibits a semiconducting-like feature in whole temperature region. Then we try to fit the electrical transport behavior of Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 sample at the highest pressure and show the fitting in Fig. 5c. The fitting curves of band gap model (the top-left inset) and VRH model (the bottom-right inset) are given. The results show that both the band gap model and the VRH model fail to fit the data. Surprisingly, the ρ versus log(1/T) curve at the highest pressure (P = 50.2 GPa) becomes roughly linear, as highlighted by the red linear line in a temperature range between 3.5 and 23 K. This strange ρ log(1/T) behavior has been reported in some correlated oxides such as underdoped and overdoped cuprates or vanadium oxide V2Se2O, which may result from the electron correlation effect in correlated oxides with 3d transition metals42,43,44. Meanwhile, the high pressure may change the distribution of Sr element and Ni deficiency within the grains, but due to the high diffusing barrier between different grains, we would not believe the high pressure will change the composition distribution of Sr and Ni among different grains. Thus the improvement of conductivity under pressure may be attributed to two factors. (1) The pressure can improve the electric conduction through optimizing the grain boundaries among different grains; (2) The pressure can modify the electronic band structure by making the redistribution of Sr and Ni deficiency within each grain, as well as the bandwidth through compressing the atomic lattice. These possibilities can be better resolved in future work.

Fig. 5: Temperature dependent resistivity of Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 under pressures.

a Temperature dependence of resistivity for Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 at various pressures. b The applied pressure dependence of ρ2K/ρ300K for Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 sample derived from the ρ − T curve at different pressures. c The ρ versus ln(1/T) curve for Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 in the temperature range from 3.5 to 23 K at the pressure of 50.2 GPa together with the corresponding linear fit (red line). The top inset shows the curve of ln ρ versus 1/T, corresponding to band gap model. The bottom inset shows the curve of ln ρ versus T−1/4, corresponding to the VRH model.


After a systematic analysis of the data, a main experimental finding in bulk infinite-layer nickelates Nd1−xSrxNiO2 (x = 0, 0.2, 0.4) is the insulating behavior, which is in contrast to the metallic state and the superconductivity below 9–15 K in Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 thin film18. It is certainly very important to know whether the insulating behavior in the bulk Nd1−xSrxNiO2 is intrinsic. Based on the nice fitting to the XRD data and composition analysis on the grains of the samples, we can safely conclude that the main phase in the samples is definitely the Nd1−xSrxNiO2 (x = 0.2, 0.4) with only some disconnected segregation clusters of Ni. From previous literatures, we find that nickel is a metal with the resistivity of about 7.2 mΩ cm at room temperature45, so it would be a metallic behavior if the segregated grains of nickel form a conductive network. However, from our SEM image, the segregated nickel grains are well separated with each other. The behavior of resistance both in ambient and high pressure indicates that the insulating behavior is robust in our samples. Thus, the existence of disconnected nickel regions in samples may only affect the absolute value of resistivity, but not gives rise to the intrinsic insulating behavior. In principle, high pressure can compress the cell volume and reduce the lattice parameters of compound, resulting in insulator–metal transitions and even superconductivity46,47. The clear suppression of insulating behavior in our high-pressure study may be induced by the improving of the grain boundaries, modification of the bands, or the weakening of the correlation effect, which leads to an enhanced effective density of states at the Fermi energy.

Since we do not find superconductivity in our bulk samples with the same structure and close lattice constants as the reported films18, we would like to suggest several reasons to interpret this discrepancy. Firstly, the superconductivity in Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 films may arise from the interface or the stress effect given by the substrates. In the interface region, both the electron band and the doping level would be strongly modified, which could lead to superconductivity. The second reason may be the appreciable Ni deficiency (5–9%) in grains of Nd1−xSrxNiO2 of our samples, which may cause stronger buckling of the NiO2 planes and lead to a strong localization or scattering of charges. If this is the case, we need to make samples without Ni deficiency. It would be interesting to know whether the reported films also have Ni deficiency.

To summarize, we have successfully synthesized bulk Nd1−xSrxNiO2 (x = 0, 0.2, 0.4) samples and performed comprehensive studies of the physical properties. From structure and composition analyses by XRD and EDS, the tetragonal Nd1−xSrxNiO2 (x = 0, 0.2, 0.4) phase is established and the strontium content is inhomogeneous and sufficient in most grains, but the Ni is deficient. The electrical transport and magnetization measurements reveal an insulating behavior and a C–W like feature with a ferromagnetic background caused by nickel segregations. Electrical transport measurements under high pressure show that the insulating behavior can be effectively suppressed but superconductivity is still not observed.


Sample growth

To synthesize polycrystalline samples of Nd1−xSrxNiO2 (x = 0, 0.2, 0.4), we first prepare polycrystalline Nd2−2xSr2xNiO4 (x = 0, 0.2, 0.4) samples by the solid-state reaction of Nd2O3, NiO, and SrO at 1200 °C for 24 h. And then we use precursor Nd2−2xSr2xNiO4, NiO, and KClO4 to synthesize the Nd1−xSrxNiO3 (x = 0, 0.2, 0.4) with high pressure and high temperature. Here KClO4 is used as an excess oxygen source. Then the mixture is pressed into a pellet and sealed in a gold capsule. This procedure is done in a glove box with oxygen and water concentrations less than 0.1 ppm. The gold capsule is placed in a BN capsule and heated up to 1000 °C and stayed for 2 h at this temperature under a pressure of 2 GPa. The resultant compound is the perovskite Nd1−xSrxNiO3 phase which is verified by powder X-ray diffraction at room temperature (see Supplementary Fig. 7 and Supplementary Note 3). Next, the samples of Nd1−xSrxNiO2 are obtained by reacting Nd1−xSrxNiO3 (x = 0, 0.2, 0.4) with CaH2, which is similar to the previous report48,49. The obtained Nd1−xSrxNiO3 samples are washed by distilled water and then dried, ground with the CaH2 in a ratio of 1:3 and then pressed into pellets. The pellets are sealed in a quartz tube, followed by heating treatment at 280 °C for 20 h. Then the resultant pellets are crushed and washed with saturated NH4Cl in anhydrous ethanol to remove the residual CaH2 and the reacted byproduct CaO, and then dried in an evacuated oven. The target sample of the 112 phase in powder form is obtained. For measuring resistivity, the powders are pressed into a pellet again, and sealed with untouched CaH2 powders in a quartz tube, followed by another heating treatment at 180 °C for 10 h.

Physical properties measurements

The crystal structures of the prepared samples are determined by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) (Bruker D8 Advance) using Cu- radiation at room temperature with a scanning step of 0.01° and 2θ from 10° to 90°. The Rietveld refinements are done based on the TOPAS4.2 software32,50. The SEM photograph of the polycrystalline and the energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis spectrum are done by Phenom ProX (Phenom). The measurements are performed at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV. The DC magnetization is measured with a SQUID based on the vibrating sample technique (SQUID-VSM 7T, Quantum Design). The electrical resistances at ambient pressure are measured by the standard four-probe method using the physical property measurement system (PPMS 16T, Quantum Design). The high pressure resistivity measurements are performed by using the diamond avail cell (cryoDACPPMS, Almax easyLab)51.

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Bednorz, J. G. & Müller, K. A. Possible high Tc superconductivity in the Ba–La–Cu–O system. Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 64, 189–193 (1986).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Anderson, P. W. The resonating valence bond state in La2CuO4 and superconductivity. Science 235, 1196–1198 (1987).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Tsuei, C. C. & Kirtley, J. R. Pairing symmetry in cuprate superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 969–1016 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Lee, P. A., Nagaosa, N. & Wen, X.-G. Doping a Mott insulator: physics of high-temperature superconductivity. Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 17–85 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Keimer, B. et al. From quantum matter to high-temperature superconductivity in copper oxides. Nature 518, 179–186 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Vaknin, D. et al. Antiferromagnetism in La2CuO4−y. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2802–2805 (1987).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Shen, Z.-X. et al. Anomalously Large Gap Anistropy in the a–b Plane of Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1553–1556 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Wollman, D. A. et al. Experimental determination of the superconducting pairing state in YBCO from the phase coherence of YBCO-Pb dc SQUIDs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2134–2137 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Tsuei, C. C. et al. Pairing symmetry and flux quantization in a tricrystal superconducting ring of YBa2Cu3O7−δ. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 593–596 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kamihara, Y. et al. Iron-based layered superconductor La[O1−xFx]FeAs (x = 0.05–0.12) with Tc = 26 K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 3296–3297 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Si, Q. & Steglich, F. Heavy fermions and quantum phase transitions. Science 329, 1161–1166 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Chaloupka, J. & Khaliullin, G. Orbital order and possible superconductivity in LaNiO3/LaMO3 superlattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 016404 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Zhang, J. et al. Large orbital polarization in a metallic square-planar nickelate. Nature Phys. 13, 864–869 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Azuma, M. et al. Superconductivity at 110K in the infinite-layer compound (Sr1−xCax)1−yCuO2. Nature 356, 775–776 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Anisimov, V. I., Bukhvalov, D. & Rice, T. M. Electronic structure of possible nickelate analogs to the cuprates. Phys. Rev. B 59, 7901–7906 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Boris, A. V. et al. Dimensionality control of electronic phase transitions in nickel-oxide superlattices. Science 332, 937–940 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Middey, S. et al. Physics of ultrathin films and heterostructures of rare-earth nickelates. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 46, 305–334 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Li, D. et al. Superconductivity in an infinite-layer nickelate. Nature 572, 624–627 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Hirsch, J. E. & Marsiglio, F. Hole superconductivity in infinite-layer nickelates. Physica C: Supercond. Appl. 566, 1353534 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Botana, A. S. & Norman, M. R. Similarities and differences between infinite-layer nickelates and cuprates and implications for superconductivity. Phys. Rev. X 10, 011024 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Sakakibara, H. et al. Model construction and a possibility of cuprate-like pairing in a new d9 nickelate superconductor (Nd,Sr)NiO2. Preprint at (2019).

  22. 22.

    Hepting, M. et al. Electronic structure of the parent compound of superconducting infinite-layer nickelates. Nat. Mater. (2020).

  23. 23.

    Wu, X. et al. Robust \(d_{x^2 - y^2}\)-wave superconductivity of infinite-layer nickelates. Phys. Rev. B 101, 060504 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Nomura, Y. et al. Formation of 2D single-component correlated electron system and band engineering in the nickelate superconductor NdNiO2. Phys. Rev. B 100, 205138 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ryee, S. et al. Induced magnetic two-dimensionality by hole doping in superconducting Nd1−xSrxNiO2. Phys. Rev. B 101, 064513 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Zhang, G.-M., Yang, Y.-F. & Zhang, F.-C. Self-doped Mott insulator for parent compounds of nickelate superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 101, 020501 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Zhang, Y.-H. & Vishwanath, A. Type II t − J model in superconducting nickelate Nd1−xSrxNiO2. Preprint at (2019).

  28. 28.

    Gu, Y. et al. Hybridization and correlation effects in the electronic structure of infinite-layer nickelates. Preprint at (2019).

  29. 29.

    Hu, L.-H. & Wu, C. Two-band model for magnetism and superconductivity in nickelates. Phys. Rev. Research 1, 032046 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hirayama, M. et al. Materials design of dynamically stable d9 layered nickelates. Phys. Rev. B 101, 075107 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Bernardini, F., Olevano, V. & Cano, A. Magnetic penetration depth and TC in superconducting nickelates. Phys. Rev. Research 2, 013219 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Hayward, M. A. et al. Sodium hydride as a powerful reducing agent for topotactic oxide deintercalation: synthesis and characterization of the nickel(I) oxide LaNiO2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 8843–8854 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Rietveld, H. M. A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures. J. Appl. Cryst. 2, 65–71 (1969).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Fratini, M. et al. Scale-free structural organization of oxygen interstitials in La2CuO4+y. Nature 466, 841–844 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Poccia, N. et al. Optimum inhomogeneity of local lattice distortions in La2CuO4+y. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 109, 15685–15690 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Campi, G. et al. Inhomogeneity of charge-density-wave order and quenched disorder in a high-Tc superconductor. Nature 525, 359–362 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Li, J. et al. Scale-invariant magnetic textures in the strongly correlated oxide NdNiO3. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–7 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Mott, N. F. & Davis, E. A. Electronic Processes in Non-Crystalline Materials (Clarendon, Oxford, 1979).

  39. 39.

    Frydman, A. & Ovadyahu, Z. Spin and quantum interference effects in hopping conductivity. Solid State Commun. 94, 745–749 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Vaknin, A. et al. High-field magnetoconductance in Anderson insulators. Phys. Rev. B 54, 13604–13610 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Zhang, J. et al. Evolution of a novel ribbon phase in optimally doped Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ at high pressure and its implication to high-TC superconductivity. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 4182–4188 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Ando, Y. et al. Logarithmic divergence of both in-plane and out-of-plane normal-state resistivities of superconducting La2−xSrxCuO4 in the zero-temperature limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4662–4665 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Ono, S. et al. Metal-to-insulator crossover in the low-temperature normal state of Bi2Sr2−xLaxCuO6+δ. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 638–641 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Lin, H. et al. Structure and physical properties of CsV2Se2−xO and V2Se2O. Phys. Rev. B 98, 075132 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Jordan, L. & Swanger, W. H. The properties of pure nickel. Bur. Stand. J. Res. 5, 1291–1307 (1930).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Wang, Y. et al. Emergent superconductivity in an iron-based honeycomb lattice initiated by pressure-driven spin-crossover. Nat. Commun. 9, 1914 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Coak, M. J. et al. Isostructural Mott transition in 2D honeycomb antiferromagnet V0.9PS3. npj Quantum Mater. 38, (2019).

  48. 48.

    Takamatsu, T. et al. Low-temperature synthesis of the infinite-layer compound LaNiO2 by soft-chemical techniques. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 49, 093101 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Hayward, M. A. & Rosseinsky, M. J. Synthesis of the infinite layer Ni(I) phase NdNiO2+x by low temperature reduction of NdNiO3 with sodium hydride. Solid State Sci. 5, 839–850 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Cheary, R. W. & Coelho, A. A fundamental parameters approach to x-ray line-profile fitting. J. Appl. Cryst. 25, 109–121 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Wang, E. et al. Pressure induced superconductivity in the compound ScZrCo. New J. Phys. 20, 073036 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFA0300401 and 2016YFA0401704), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. A0402/11534005 and A0402/11674164), and the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDB25000000).

Author information




The samples were grown by Q.L., C.P.H, Y.Z., and X.Y.Z. The physical properties measurements were conducted by Q.L. and J.S. The structure and composition analyses were done by Q.L., C.P.H. and X.Y.Z. H.-H.W., X.Y.Z., and Q.L. wrote the manuscript with the supplementary by others. All authors have discussed the results and the interpretations.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiyu Zhu or Hai-Hu Wen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Q., He, C., Si, J. et al. Absence of superconductivity in bulk Nd1−xSrxNiO2. Commun Mater 1, 16 (2020).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing