Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Viewpoint
  • Published:

Insect declines in the Anthropocene

Nature Reviews Earth & Environment volume 4, pages 683–686 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Reports of stark declines in invertebrate biomass prompted attention-grabbing news headlines about an ‘insect apocalypse’, fuelling public and scientific interest in the insect biodiversity crisis. However, substantial discussion has ensued regarding the magnitude and generality of these losses. In this Viewpoint, five researchers offer their views on the insect decline debate.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Hallmann, C. A. et al. More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas. PloS ONE 12, e0185809 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lister, B. C. & Garcia, A. Climate-driven declines in arthropod abundance restructure a rainforest food web. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E10397–E10406 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Thomas, C., Jones, T. H. & Hartley, S. E. ‘Insectageddon’: a call for more robust data and rigorous analyses. Glob. Chang. Biol. 25, 1891–1892 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Welti, E. A. R. et al. Studies of insect temporal trends must account for the complex sampling histories inherent to many long-term monitoring efforts. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 589–591 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cardoso, P. & Leather, S. R. Predicting a global insect apocalypse. Insect Conser. Divers. 12, 263–267 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Saunders, M. E., Janes, J. K. & O’Hanlon, J. C. Moving on from the insect apocalypse narrative: engaging with evidence-based insect conservation. BioScience 70, 80–89 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. van Klink, R. et al. Meta-analysis reveals declines in terrestrial but increases in freshwater insect abundances. Science 368, 417–420 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Almond, R. E. A., Grooten, M, Juffe Bignoli, D. & Petersen, T. (eds) Living Planet Report 2022 — Building a Nature-Positive Society (WWF, 2022).

  9. Simmons, B. I. et al. Worldwide insect declines: an important message, but interpret with caution. Ecol. Evol. 9, 3678–3680 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Forister, M. L. et al. Missing the bigger picture: why insect monitoring programs are limited in their ability to document the effects of habitat loss. Conserv. Lett. 16, e12951 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gebert, F. et al. Recent trends in stream macroinvertebrates: warm-adapted and pesticide-tolerant taxa increase in richness. Biol. Lett. 18, 20210513 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Seibold, S. et al. Arthropod decline in grasslands and forests is associated with landscape-level drivers. Nature 574, 671–674 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Staab, M. et al. Insect decline in forests depends on species’ traits and may be mitigated by management. Commun. Biol. 6, 338 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Miličić, M., Popov, S., Branco, V. V. & Cardoso, P. Insect threats and conservation through the lens of global experts. Conserv. Lett. 14, e12814 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dicks, L. V. et al. A global-scale expert assessment of drivers and risks associated with pollinator decline. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1453–1461 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Scheper, J. et al. Museum specimens reveal loss of pollen host plants as key factor driving wild bee decline in the Netherlands. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 17552–17557 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bell, J. R., Blumgart, D. & Shortall, C. R. Are insects declining and at what rate? An analysis of standardised, systematic catches of aphid and moth abundances across Great Britain. Insect Conserv. Divers. 13, 115–126 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Neff, F. et al. Different roles of concurring climate and regional land-use changes in past 40 years’ insect trends. Nat. Commun. 13, 7611 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Blüthgen, N., Staab, M., Achury, R. & Weisser, W. W. Unravelling insect declines: can space replace time? Biol. Lett. 18, 20210666 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Weisser, W. W., Blüthgen, N., Staab, M., Achury, R. & Müller, J. Experiments are needed to quantify the main causes of insect decline. Biol. Lett. 19, 20220500 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. van Klink, R. et al. Emerging technologies revolutionise insect ecology and monitoring. Trends Ecol. Evol. 37, 872–885 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Grames, E. M. et al. A framework and case study to systematically identify long‐term insect abundance and diversity datasets. Conserv. Sci. Prac. 4, e12687 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. van Klink, R., Bowler, D. E., Gongalsky, K. B. & Chase, J. M. Long-term abundance trends of insect taxa are only weakly correlated. Biol. Lett. 18, 20210554 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Slade, E. M. & Ong, X. R. The future of tropical insect diversity: strategies to fill data and knowledge gaps. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 58,, 101063 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Di Marco, M. et al. Changing trends and persisting biases in three decades of conservation science. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 10, 32–42 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fox, R. et al. The State of Britain’s Larger Moths 2021 (Butterfly Conservation, Rothamsted Research and UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, 2021).

  27. Kaiser-Bunbury, C. N. et al. Ecosystem restoration strengthens pollination networks. Nature 542, 223–227 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Outhwaite, C. L., Gregory, R. D., Chandler, R. E., Collen, B. & Isaac, N. J. B. Complex long-term biodiversity change among invertebrates, bryophytes and lichens. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 384–392 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

N.B. receives support from the German Research Foundation (DFG) (Biodiversity Exploratories SPP 1374, Reassembly FOR 5207) and Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (Feda Initiative, BioDivKultur). L.V.D. receives support from the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) (NE/V007173/1). M.L.F. receives support from the US National Science Foundation (DEB-2114793). C.L.O. receives support from NERC (NE/V006533/1). E.M.S. receives support from the Singapore Ministry of Education (MOE) Academic Research Fund Tier 2 grant (grant no. MOE-T2EP30221–0020).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ecological Networks, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany

    Nico Blüthgen

  2. Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Lynn V. Dicks

  3. School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

    Lynn V. Dicks

  4. Department of Biology, University of Nevada Reno, Reno, NV, US

    Matthew L. Forister

  5. Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, University College London, London, UK

    Charlotte L. Outhwaite

  6. Asian School of the Environment, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore

    Eleanor M. Slade

Authors
  1. Nico Blüthgen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lynn V. Dicks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matthew L. Forister
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Charlotte L. Outhwaite
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Eleanor M. Slade
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nico Blüthgen, Lynn V. Dicks, Matthew L. Forister, Charlotte L. Outhwaite or Eleanor M. Slade.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The Contributors

Nico Blüthgen is a professor for ecological networks at the Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany. Research projects from his lab and collaborators include land-use effects on insect communities, their interactions and functional roles in different ecosystems, from forests or grasslands in Germany to tropical rainforests in Ecuador. In the Ecuadorian Chocó, he currently studies multiple aspects of natural forest recovery from agricultural land.

Lynn Dicks is a professor of ecology at the University of Cambridge, UK. Her PhD was on the structure and functioning of flower-visiting insect communities, and she now leads research on insect conservation and management of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. She was a Co-ordinating Lead Author of the IPBES Assessment Report on Pollinators, Pollination and Food Production in 2016.

Matthew Forister is a professor in the Biology Department at the University of Nevada, Reno. Research in his lab focuses on insect ecology and evolution, in particular on the conservation of butterflies in the western United States. Forister and his students are now overseeing part of the Shapiro monitoring programme, adding to over five decades of butterfly observations across northern California.

Charlotte Outhwaite is a postdoctoral research fellow at the Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, University College London. Her research on insect biodiversity change encompasses large-scale patterns and responses to major pressures. Her lab uses invertebrates as model systems to help address the challenges and opportunities associated with conservation, management and restoration of human-modified landscapes.

Eleanor Slade is an Assistant Professor at the Asian School of the Environment, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore and PI of the Tropical Ecology and Entomology Lab (https://teelabntu.wixsite.com/home). Her research explores the links between invertebrate biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, and community interactions. The broader goal of her work is to solve challenges and opportunities associated with conservation, management and restoration of human-modified landscapes.

Related links

Global Insect Threat-Response Synthesis: https://glitrs.ceh.ac.uk/

New York Times coverage of insect apocalypse: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/27/magazine/insect-apocalypse.html

Status of Insects Research Coordination Network: https://statusofinsects.github.io/index.html

The Atlantic article on the insect decline debate: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/02/insect-apocalypse-really-upon-us/583018/

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blüthgen, N., Dicks, L.V., Forister, M.L. et al. Insect declines in the Anthropocene. Nat Rev Earth Environ 4, 683–686 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00478-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00478-x

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing