Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Detailed monitoring reveals the nature of submarine turbidity currents

Nature Reviews Earth & Environment volume 4, pages 642–658 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Seafloor sediment flows, called turbidity currents, form the largest sediment accumulations, deepest canyons and longest channels on Earth. It was once thought that turbidity currents were impractical to measure in action, especially given their ability to damage sensors in their path, but direct monitoring since the mid-2010s has measured them in detail. In this Review, we summarize knowledge of turbidity currents gleaned from this direct monitoring. Monitoring identifies triggering mechanisms from dilute river plumes, and shows how rapid sediment accumulation can precondition slope failure, but the final triggers can be delayed and subtle. Turbidity currents are consistently more frequent than predicted by past sequence-stratigraphic models, including at sites >300 km from any coast. Faster flows (more than ~1.5 m s–1) are driven by a dense near-bed layer at their front, whereas slower flows are entirely dilute. This frontal layer sometimes erodes large (>2.5 km3) volumes of sediment, yet maintains a near-uniform speed, leading to a travelling-wave model. Monitoring shows that flows sculpt canyons and channels through fast-moving knickpoints, and shows how deposits originate. Emerging technologies with reduced cost and risk can lead to widespread monitoring of turbidity currents, so their sediment and carbon fluxes can be compared with other major global transport processes.

Key points

  • Previously, submarine turbidity currents were thought to be impractical to monitor in action, mainly owing to their ability to damage sensors in their path, but detailed monitoring is now possible and is revealing major new insights.

  • Direct monitoring is identifying triggers for flows, such as very dilute river plumes, and consistently shows that turbidity currents occur much more frequently than predicted by past models such as sequence-stratigraphic models.

  • Owing to turbidity currents, the global burial efficiency of terrestrial organic carbon (28–45%) in marine sediments is substantially higher than previous estimates of 10–30%, and even higher (>60–80%) during glacial low-stands.

  • Fast (>1.5 m s–1) turbidity currents are driven by a dense (10–30% concentration) near-bed layer at their front, which must be included in flow models, whereas slower flows are entirely dilute.

  • This dense frontal layer sometimes erodes large sediment volumes (as for ignition), yet maintains a near-uniform speed (as for autosuspension), leading to a new, travelling-wave model for flow behaviour.

  • Direct monitoring reveals how flows sculpt canyons and channels, such as through supercritical bedforms and internally generated fast-moving knickpoints, and how deposits record flow processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Comparison between turbidity currents and other major global sediment transfer processes.
Fig. 2: Turbidity currents have a globally important role in organic carbon burial.
Fig. 3: Direct monitoring of turbidity currents.
Fig. 4: Insights into the causes of turbidity currents.
Fig. 5: Submarine fans and frequency of turbidity-current activity.
Fig. 6: Insights into the internal structure of turbidity currents.
Fig. 7: A new view of how turbidity currents behave.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kuenen, P. H. & Migliorini, C. I. Turbidity currents as a cause of graded bedding. J. Geol. 58, 91–127 (1950).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Heezen, B. C. & Ewing, M. Turbidity currents and submarine slumps, and the 1929 Grand Banks earthquake. Am. J. Sci. 250, 849–873 (1952).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Piper, D. J. W., Cochonat, P. & Morrison, M. L. The sequence of events around the epicenter of the 1929 Grand Banks earthquake: initiation of the debris flows and turbidity current inferred from side scan sonar. Sedimentology 46, 79–97 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Talling, P. J. et al. Longest sediment flows yet measured show how major rivers connect efficiently to deep-sea. Nat. Commun. 13, 4193 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Talling, P. J. et al. Novel sensor array helps to understand submarine cable faults off West Africa. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.31223/X5W328 (2022).

  6. Carter, L., Milliman, J., Talling, P. J., Gavey, R. & Wynn, R. B. Near-synchronous and delayed initiation of long run-out submarine sediment flows from a record breaking river-flood, offshore Taiwan. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L12063 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carter, L., Gavey, R., Talling, P. & Liu, J. Insights into submarine geohazards from breaks in subsea telecommunication cables. Oceanography 27, 58–67 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Galy, V. et al. Efficient organic carbon burial in the Bengal fan sustained by the Himalayan erosional system. Nature 450, 407–410 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kao, S.-J. et al. Preservation of terrestrial organic carbon in marine sediments offshore Taiwan: mountain building and atmospheric carbon dioxide sequestration. Earth Surf. Dynam. 2, 127–139 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hilton, R. G. & West, A. J. Mountains, erosion and the carbon cycle. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 284–299 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Berner, R. A. Biogeochemical cycles of carbon and sulfur and their effect on atmospheric oxygen over Phanerozoic time. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 73, 97–122 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Burdige, D. J. Burial of terrestrial organic matter in marine sediments: a reassessment. Glob. Biog. Cycles 19, GB4011 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Blair, N. L. & Aller, R. C. The fate of terrestrial organic carbon in the marine environment. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 4, 401–423 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Talling, P. J. et al. The global turbidity current pump and its implications for organic carbon cycling. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-032223-103626 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Amaro, T. et al. The Whittard Canyon — a case study of submarine canyon processes. Prog. Oceanogr. 146, 38–57 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rabouille, C., Baudin, F., Dennielou, B. & Olu, K. Organic carbon transfer and ecosystem functioning in the terminal lobes of the Congo deep-sea fan: outcomes of the Congolobe project. Deep Sea Res. Part II 142, 1–6 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mountjoy, J. J. et al. Earthquakes drive large-scale submarine canyon development and sediment supply to deep-ocean basins. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar3748 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Puig, P. et al. Ploughing the deep-sea floor. Nature 489, 286–289 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kane, I. A. & Clare, M. A. Dispersion, accumulation, and the ultimate fate of microplastics in deep-marine environments: a review and future directions. Front. Earth Sci. 7, 00080 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Goldfinger, C. Submarine paleoseismology based on turbidite records. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 3, 35–66 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Howarth, J. D. et al. Calibrating the marine turbidite paleoseismometer using the 2016 Kaikōura earthquake. Nat. Geosci. 14, 161–167 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Talling, P. J. Fidelity of turbidites as earthquake records. Nat. Geosci. 14, 113–116 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pettingill, H. S. & Weimer, P. Worldwide deepwater exploration and production: past, present, and future. Lead. Edge 21, 371 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Peakall, J. & Sumner, E. J. Submarine channel flow processes and deposits: a process-product perspective. Geomorphology 244, 95–120 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Parker, G., Fukushima, Y. & Pantin, H. M. Self-accelerating turbidity currents. J. Fluid Mech. 171, 145–181 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lowe, D. R. Sediment gravity flows. 2. Depositional models with special reference to high density turbidity currents. J. Sedim. Petrol. 52, 279–298 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Inman, D. L., Nordstrom, C. E. & Reinhard, E. F. Currents in submarine canyons: an air–sea–land interaction. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 8, 275–310 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dill, R. F. Earthquake effects on fill of Scripps submarine canyon. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 80, 321–328 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hay, A. E., Burling, E. W. & Murray, J. W. Remote acoustic detection of a turbidity current surge. Science 217, 833–845 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bornhold, B. D., Ren, P. & Prior, D. B. High-frequency turbidity currents in British Columbia fjords. Geo-Mar. Lett. 14, 238–243 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Khripounoff, A. et al. Direct observation of intense turbidity current activity in the Zaire submarine valley at 4000 m water depth. Mar. Geol. 194, 151–158 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Talling, P. J. et al. Key future directions for research on turbidity currents and their deposits. J. Sedim. Res. 85, 153–169 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kneller, B. & Buckee, C. The structure and fluid mechanics of turbidity currents: a review of some recent studies and their geological implications. Sedimentology 47, 62–94 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Xu, J. P., Noble, M. A. & Rosenfeld, L. K. In-situ measurements of velocity structure within turbidity currents. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L09311 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Paull, C. K. et al. Powerful turbidity currents driven by dense basal layers. Nat. Commun. 9, 4114 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Azpiroz-Zabala, M. et al. Newly recognized turbidity current structure can explain prolonged flushing of submarine canyons. Sci. Adv. 3, e1700200 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Simmons, S. M. et al. Novel acoustic method provides first detailed measurements of sediment concentration structure within submarine turbidity currents. J. Geophy. Res. 125, e2019JC015904 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hughes Clarke, J. E. First wide-angle view of channelized turbidity currents links migrating cyclic steps to flow characteristics. Nat. Commun. 7, 11896 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hage, S. et al. Direct monitoring reveals initiation of turbidity currents from extremely dilute river plumes. Geophy. Res. Lett. 46, 11310–11320 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Pope, E. L. et al. First source-to-sink monitoring shows dense head determines sediment gravity flow runout. Sci. Adv. 8, eabj3220 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Liu, J. T., Kao, S.-J., Huh, C.-A. & Hung, C.-C. Gravity flows associated with flood events and carbon burial: Taiwan as instructional source area. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 5, 47–68 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Liu, J. T. et al. Cyclone induced hyperpycnal turbidity currents in a submarine canyon. J. Geophys. Res. 117, C04033 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Normandeau, A. et al. Storm-induced turbidity currents on a sediment-starved shelf: insight from direct monitoring and repeat seabed mapping of upslope migrating bedforms. Sedimentology 67, 1045–1068 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Xu, J. P., Swarzenski, P. W., Noble, M. & Li, A.-C. Event-driven sediment flux in Hueneme and Mugu submarine canyons, southern California. Mar. Geol. 269, 74–88 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Khripounoff, A., Crassous, P., Lo Bue, N., Dennielou, B. & Silva Jacinto, R. Different types of sediment gravity flows detected in the Var submarine canyon (northwestern Mediterranean Sea). Prog. Oceanogr. 106, 138–153 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Heerema, K. et al. How distinctive are flood-triggered turbidity currents? J. Sedim. Res. 92, 1–11 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Lintern, D. G., Hill, P. R. & Stacey, C. Powerful unconfined turbidity current captured by cabled observatory on the Fraser River delta slope, British Columbia, Canada. Sedimentology 63, 1041–1064 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Hill, P. R. & Lintern, D. G. Turbidity currents on the open slope of the Fraser delta. Mar. Geol. 445, 106738 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang, Z. et al. Direct evidence of a high-concentration basal layer in a submarine turbidity current. Deep Sea Res. Part I 161, 103300 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hage, S. et al. How to recognize crescentic bedforms formed by supercritical turbidity currents in the rock record: insights from active submarine channels. Geology 6, 563–566 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Maier, K. L. et al. Linking direct measurements of turbidity currents to submarine canyon-floor deposits. Front. Earth Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00144 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Meng, L., Wang, Z. & Xu, J. Two distinct types of turbidity currents observed in the Manila Trench, South China Sea. Commun. Earth Env. 4, 108 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Gwiazda, R. et al. Near-bed structure of sediment gravity flows measured by motion-sensing ‘boulder-like’ benthic event detectors (BEDs) in Monterey Canyon. J. Geophys. Res. 127, JF006437 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Hill, P. Changes in submarine channel morphology and slope sedimentation patterns from repeat multibeam surveys in the Fraser River delta, western Canada. Int. Assoc. Sedimentol. Spec. Pub. 44, 47–70 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Talling, P. J., Paull, C. K. & Piper, D. J. W. How are subaqueous sediment density flows triggered, what is their internal structure and how does it evolve? Direct observations from monitoring of active flows. Earth Sci. Rev. 125, 244–287 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Piper, D. J. W. & Normark, W. R. Processes that initiate turbidity currents and their influence on turbidites: a marine geology perspective. J. Sedim. Res. 79, 347–362 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Clare, M. A. et al. Direct monitoring of active geohazards: emerging geophysical tools for deep-water assessments. Surf. Geophys. 15, 427–444 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Mulder, T., Syvitski, J. P. M., Migneon, S., Faugeres, J. C. & Savoye, B. Marine hyperpycnal flows: initiation, behaviour, and related deposits. A review. Mar. Petrol. Geol. 20, 861–882 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Hizzett, J. L. et al. Which triggers produce the most erosive, frequent and longest runout turbidity currents on deltas? Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 855–863 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Clare, M. A., Hughes Clarke, J. E., Talling, P. J., Cartigny, M. J. & Pratomo, D. G. Preconditioning and triggering of offshore slope failures and turbidity currents revealed by most detailed monitoring yet at a fjord-head delta. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 450, 208–220 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Bailey, L. P. et al. Preconditioning by sediment accumulation can produce powerful turbidity currents without major external triggers. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 562, 116845 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Sawyer, D. & DeVore, J. Evidence for seismic strengthening from undrained shear strength measurements. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 10216–10221 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  63. McHugh, C. M. et al. Remobilization of surficial slope sediment triggered by the A.D. 2011 Mw9 Tohoku-Oki earthquake and tsunami along the Japan Trench. Geology 44, 391–394 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Moernaut, J. et al. Lacustrine turbidites as a tool for quantitative earthquake reconstruction: new evidence for a variable rupture mode in south central Chile. J. Geophys. Res. 119, 1607–1633 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Hunt, J. E., Wynn, R. B., Masson, D. G., Talling, P. J. & Teagle, D. A. Sedimentological and geochemical evidence for multistage failure of volcanic island landslides: a case study from Icod landslide on north Tenerife, Canary Islands. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 12, GC003740 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Posamentier, H. W., Erskine, R. D. & Mitchum, R. M. Jr. in Seismic Facies and Sedimentary Processes of Submarine Fans and Turbidite Systems (eds Welmer, B. & Link, M. H.) 127–136 (Springer, 1991).

  67. Harris, P. T. & Whiteway, T. Global distribution of large submarine canyons: geomorphic differences between active and passive continental margins. Mar. Geol. 285, 69–86 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Bernhardt, A. & Schwanghart, W. Where and why do submarine canyons remain connected to the shore during sea‐level rise? Insights from global topographic analysis and bayesian regression. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2020GL092234 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Heijnen, M. S. et al. Challenging the highstand-dormant paradigm for land-detached submarine canyons. Nat. Commun. 13, 3448 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Covault, J. A. & Graham, S. A. Submarine fans at all sea-level stands: tectono-morphologic and climatic controls on terrigenous sediment delivery to the deep-sea. Geology 38, 939–942 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Milliman, J. D. & Farnsworth, K. L. River Discharge to the Coastal Ocean: A Global Synthesis (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2011).

  72. Rogers, K. G., Goodbred, S. L. Jr. & Khan, S. R. Shelf-to-canyon connections: transport-related morphology and mass balance at the shallow-headed, rapidly aggrading Swatch of No Ground (Bay of Bengal). Mar. Geol. 369, 288–299 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Wright, L. D., Friedrichs, C. T., Kim, S. C. & Scully, M. E. Effects of ambient currents and waves on gravity-driven sediment transport on continental shelves. Mar. Geol. 175, 25–45 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Wheatcroft, R. A. & Sommerfield, C. K. River sediment flux and shelf sediment accumulation rates on the Pacific Northwest margin. Cont. Shelf Res. 25, 311–332 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Aller, R. C. & Blair, N. E. Carbon remineralization in the Amazon–Guianas mobile mudbelt: a sedimentary incinerator. Cont. Shelf Res. 26, 2241–2259 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Smith, R., Bianchi, T., Allison, M. & Savage, C. High rates of organic carbon burial in fjord sediments globally. Nat. Geosci. 8, 450–453 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Dunne, J. P., Darmiento, J. L. & Gnanadesikan, A. Synthesis of global particle export from the surface ocean and cycling through ocean interior and on the seafloor. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 21, GB4006 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Sundquist, E. T. The global carbon-dioxide budget. Science 259, 934–941 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Cartapanis, O., Galbraith, E. D., Bianchi, D. & Jacard, S. L. Carbon burial in deep-sea sediment and implications for oceanic inventories of carbon and alkalinity over the last glacial cycle. Clim. Past 14, 1819–1850 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Li, Z., Zhang, Y. G., Torres, M. & Mills, B. J. W. Neogene burial of organic carbon in the global ocean. Nature 613, 90–95 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Maier, K. L. et al. Sediment and organic carbon transport and deposition driven by internal tides along Monterey Canyon, offshore California. Deep Sea Res. 153, 103108 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Karine, O. et al. Cold-seep-like macrofaunal communities in organic- and sulfide-rich sediments of the Congo deep-sea fan. Deep. Sea Res. 142, 180–196 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Canals, M. et al. Flushing submarine canyons. Nature 444, 354–357 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Kao, S. J. et al. Cyclone driven deep-sea injection of freshwater and heat by hyperpycnal flow in the subtropics. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L21702 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Shanmugam, G. & Moiola, R. J. Reinterpretation of depositional processes in a classic flysch sequence (Pennsylvanian Jackfork Group), Ouachita Mountains, Arkansas and Oklahoma. AAPG Bull. 79, 672–695 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Talling, P. J., Sumner, E. J., Masson, D. G. & Malgesini, G. Subaqueous sediment density flows: depositional processes and deposit types. Sedimentology 59, 1937–2003 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Heerema, C. J. et al. What determines the downstream evolution of turbidity currents? Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 532, 116023 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Talling, P. J. et al. Onset of submarine debris flow deposition far from original giant landslide. Nature 450, 541–544 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. McCave, I. N. & Jones, K. P. N. Deposition of ungraded muds from high-density non-turbulent turbidity currents. Nature 133, 250–252 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Gavey, R. et al. Frequent sediment density flows during 2006 to 2015 triggered by competing seismic and weather cycles: observations from subsea cable breaks off southern Taiwan. Mar. Geol. 384, 147–158 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Traer, M. M., Hilley, G. E., Fildani, A. & McHargue, T. The sensitivity of turbidity currents to mass and momentum exchanges between these underflows and their surroundings. J. Geophys. Res. 117, F01009 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Kostic, S. & Parker, G. The response of turbidity currents to a canyon-fan transition: hydraulic jumps and depositional signatures. J. Hydraul. Res. 44, 631–653 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Covault, J. A., Kostic, S., Paull, C. K., Ryan, H. F. & Fildani, A. Submarine channel initiation, filling and maintenance from sea-floor geomorphology and morphodynamic modelling of cyclic steps. Sedimentology 61, 1031–1054 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Cartigny, M. J. B., Ventra, D., Postma, G. & Van den Berg, J. H. Morphodynamics and sedimentary structures of bedforms under supercritical-flow conditions: new insights from flume experiments. Sedimentology 61, 712–748 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Slootman, A. & Cartigny, M. J. B. Cyclic steps: review and aggradation-based classification. Earth Sci. Rev. 201, 102949 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Symons, W. O., Sumner, E. J., Talling, P. J., Cartigny, M. J. B. & Clare, M. A. Large-scale sediment waves and scours on the modern seafloor and their implications for the prevalence of supercritical flows. Mar. Geol. 371, 140–178 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Pope, E. L. et al. Origin of spectacular fields of submarine sediment waves around volcanic islands. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 493, 12–24 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Heijnen et al. Rapidly-migrating and internally-generated knickpoints can control submarine channel evolution. Nat. Commun. 11, 3129 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Chen, Y. et al. Knickpoints and crescentic bedform interactions in submarine channels. Sedimentology 69, 1358–1377 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Heijnen, M. S. et al. Fill, flush or shuffle: how is sediment carried through submarine channels to build lobes? Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 584, 117481 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Corney, R. K. T. et al. The orientation of helical flow in curved channels. Sedimentology 53, 249–257 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Imran, J. et al. Helical flow couplets in submarine gravity under-flows. Geology 35, 659–662 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Azpiroz-Zabala, M. et al. A general model for the helical structure of geophysical flows in channel bends. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 56721 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Daly, R. A. Origin of submarine ‘canyons’. Am. J. Sci. 31, 401–420 (1936).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Forel, F.-A. Les ravins sous-lacustres des fleuves glaciaires. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 11, 1–3 (1885).

    Google Scholar 

  106. Pope, E. L. et al. Landslide-dams affect sediment and carbon fluxes in deep-sea submarine canyons. Nat. Geosci. 15, 845–853 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Maier, K. L. et al. Submarine fan development revealed by integrated high-resolution datasets from La Jolla Fan, offshore California. J. Sedim. Res. 90, 468–479 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Paull, C. K. et al. Anatomy of the La Jolla submarine canyon system: offshore Southern California. Mar. Geol. 335, 16–34 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Hodgson, D. M., Peakall, J. & Maier, K. L. Submarine channel mouth settings: processes, geomorphology, and deposits. Front. Earth Sci. 10, 790320 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Wolfson-Schwehr, M. et al. Time-lapse seafloor surveys reveal how turbidity currents and internal tides in Monterey Canyon interact with the seabed at centimeter-scale. J. Geophys. Res. 128, e2022JF006705 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Mutti, E., Bernoulli, D., Ricci-Lucchi, F. & Tinterri, R. Turbidites and turbidity currents from alpine ‘flysch’ to the exploration of continental margins. Sedimentology 56, 267–318 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Baas, J. H., Van Kesteren, W. & Postma, G. Deposits of depletive high-density turbidity currents: a flume analogue of bed geometry, structure and texture. Sedimentology 51, 1053–1088 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Nielsen T., Shew, R. D., Steffens, G. S. & Studlick, J. R. J. Atlas of Deepwater Outcrops: Studies in Geology 56 (Shell Exploration and Production/AAPG, 2007).

  114. Englert, R. G. et al. Quantifying the three-dimensional stratigraphic expression of cyclic steps by integrating seafloor and deep-water outcrop observations. Sedimentology 68, 1465–1501 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Vendettuoli, D. et al. Daily bathymetric surveys document how stratigraphy is built and its extreme incompleteness: one summer offshore Squamish Delta, British Columbia. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 515, 231–247 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Talling, P. J. On the frequency distribution of turbidite thickness. Sedimentology 48, 1297–1329 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Malgesini, G. et al. Quantitative analysis of submarine-flow deposit shape in the Marnoso-Arenacea formation: what is the signature of hindered settling from dense near-bed layers? J. Sedim. Res. 85, 170–191 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Iverson, R. M., Logan, M., LaHusen, R. G. & Berti, M. The perfect debris flow? Aggregated results from 28 large‐scale experiments. J. Geophys. Res. 115, F03005 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  119. Clare, M. et al. Lessons learned from monitoring of turbidity currents and guidance for future platform designs. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Pub. 500, 605–634 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Baker, M. et al. Seabed seismometers reveal duration and structure of longest runout sediment flows on Earth. Abstract EGU23-7549 https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-7549 (2023).

  121. Hay, A. E., Hatcher, M. G. & Hughes Clarke, J. E. Underwater noise from submarine turbidity currents. JASA Express Lett. 1, 070801 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Fan, W., McGuire, J. J. & Shearer, P. M. Abundant spontaneous and dynamically triggered submarine landslides in the Gulf of Mexico. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL087213 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Covault, J. A. Submarine fans and canyon-channel systems: a review of processes, products, and models. Nat. Educ. Knowl. 3, 4 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  124. Martin, J., Palanques, A., Vitorino, J., Oliveira, A. & de Stigter, H. C. Near-bottom particulate matter dynamics in the Nazaré submarine canyon under calm and stormy conditions. Deep Sea Res. II 58, 2388–2400 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Lambert, A. & Giovanoli, F. Records of riverborne turbidity currents and indications of slope failures in the Rhone delta of Lake Geneva. Limnol. Oceanog. 33, 458–468 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Baudin, F., Rabouille, C. & Dennielou, B. Routing of terrestrial organic matter from the Congo River to the ultimate sink in the abyss: a mass balance approach. Geol. Belg. 23/1-2, 41–52 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

P.J.T. discloses support for this work from the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) (grant numbers NE/S010068/1, NE/R001952/1 and NE/K011480/1). K.L.M. acknowledges funding from NIWA Marine Geological Resources Programme and Marsden Grant 21-NIW-014). S.H. has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 899546. M.A.C. acknowledges funding from NERC including National Capability Programme (NE/R015953/1) Climate Linked Atlantic Sector Science (CLASS), Environmental Risks to Infrastructure: Identifying and Filling the Gaps (NE/P005780/1) and New Field-scale Calibration of Turbidity Current Impact Modelling (NE/P009190/1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of Durham, Durham, UK

    Peter J. Talling

  2. Department of Geography, University of Durham, Durham, UK

    Matthieu J. B. Cartigny, Ed Pope & Megan Baker

  3. Ocean BioGeosciences Group, National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, UK

    Michael A. Clare

  4. School of Ocean and Earth Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

    Maarten Heijnen

  5. Geo-Ocean, University of Brest, CNRS, IFREMER, Plouzané, France

    Sophie Hage & Ricardo Silva Jacinto

  6. Energy and Environment Institute, University of Hull, Hull, UK

    Dan R. Parsons & Steve M. Simmons

  7. Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Moss Landing, CA, USA

    Charlie K. Paull & Roberto Gwiazda

  8. Geological Survey of Canada, Natural Resources Canada, Sidney, British Columbia, Canada

    Gwyn Lintern

  9. University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA

    John E. Hughes Clarke

  10. Southern University of Science and Technology, Guangdong, China

    Jingping Xu

  11. National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Te Whanganui-a-Tara Wellington, Aotearoa, New Zealand

    Katherine L. Maier

Authors
  1. Peter J. Talling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthieu J. B. Cartigny
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ed Pope
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Megan Baker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michael A. Clare
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Maarten Heijnen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sophie Hage
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Dan R. Parsons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Steve M. Simmons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Charlie K. Paull
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Roberto Gwiazda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Gwyn Lintern
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. John E. Hughes Clarke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Jingping Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Ricardo Silva Jacinto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Katherine L. Maier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors researched data for the article. M.J.B.C., E.P., M.B., M.A.C., M.H., S.H., D.R.P., C.K.P., G.L. and P.J.T. contributed substantially to discussion of the content. P.J.T. wrote the article. M.J.B.C., E.P., M.B., M.A.C., M.H., S.H., D.R.P., C.K.P., R.G., G.L., R.S.J. and P.J.T. reviewed and/or edited the manuscript before submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter J. Talling.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Earth and Environment thanks Chengliang Gong, Michele Rebesco and David Piper for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Glossary

Acoustic Doppler current profiler

Sensor emitting a sound-pulse that is scattered from sand and mud particles within a turbidity current, which measures the speed of those particles at different heights above the seabed to produce a velocity profile.

Autosuspension

A near-equilibrium state that occurs when the settling of sand and mud from a turbidity current is balanced by seafloor erosion, leading to near-uniform flow velocity.

Dissipation

A negative feedback loop leading to the deceleration of a turbidity current, as the settling of sand and mud causes the flow to become less dense and slower, causing further settling.

Frontal cell

The frontal part of faster-moving (more than ~1.5 m s–1) turbidity current that is faster than the rest of the flow, and contains a near-bed layer with high sediment concentrations.

Ignition

Positive feedback leading to the acceleration of a turbidity current owing to seafloor erosion that causes the flow to become even faster and denser, leading to more erosion.

Remineralization

The process by which organic carbon is turned into CO2.

Submarine canyon

A valley that is deeply incised into the seafloor through which turbidity currents flow, which is much deeper than a submarine channel.

Submarine channel

A channel incised into the seafloor (less deeply than a canyon) through which turbidity currents flow. Its upraised flanks (called levees) can lie above the surrounding seabed.

Submarine fan

A large-scale accumulation of sediment formed by turbidity currents that comprises a canyon, channel with levees (upraised flanks of a submarine channel that lie above the surrounding seafloor, formed by the overspill of turbidity currents from the channel), and a lobe (a region that lies beyond the end of a submarine channel, where turbidity currents expand, often characterized by unusually rapid sediment deposition and scours).

Supercritical flow

Flows can exist in two basic states: either thin and fast (‘supercritical’) flow or thick and slow (‘subcritical’) flow, which are separated by a hydraulic jump.

Turbidite

Layer of sand and mud that has settled out from a turbidity current to form a deposit on the ocean or lake floor.

Turbidity currents

Underwater avalanches of sediment and water that are denser than the surrounding water and thus move down-slope along the ocean or lake floor.

Varves

A varve is a thin layer of fine sediment that represents the deposit of a single year within a lake.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Talling, P.J., Cartigny, M.J.B., Pope, E. et al. Detailed monitoring reveals the nature of submarine turbidity currents. Nat Rev Earth Environ 4, 642–658 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00458-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00458-1

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene