Mercury (Hg) is a global pollutant that emits in large quantities to the atmosphere (>6,000–8,000 Mg Hg per year) through anthropogenic activities, biomass burning, geogenic degassing and legacy emissions from land and oceans. Up to two-thirds of terrestrial Hg emissions are deposited back onto land, predominantly through vegetation uptake of Hg. In this Review, we assemble a global database of over 35,000 Hg measurements taken across 440 sites and synthesize the sources, distributions and sinks of Hg in foliage and vegetated ecosystems. Lichen and mosses show higher Hg concentrations than vascular plants, and, whereas Hg in above-ground biomass is largely from atmospheric uptake, root Hg is from combined soil and atmospheric uptake. Vegetation Hg uptake from the atmosphere and transfer to soils is the major Hg source in all biomes, globally accounting for 60–90% of terrestrial Hg deposition and decreasing the global atmospheric Hg pool by approximately 660 Mg. Moreover, it reduces the Hg deposition to global oceans, which, in the absence of vegetation, might receive an additional Hg deposition of 960 Mg per year. Vegetation uptake mechanisms need to be better constrained to understand vegetation cycling, and model representation of vegetation Hg cycling should be improved to quantify global vegetation impacts.
In forest ecosystems, 60–90% of mercury (Hg) originates from vegetation uptake of atmospheric gaseous elemental mercury (Hg(0)), providing 1,180–1,410 Mg per year of terrestrial Hg deposition.
Vegetation uptake of atmospheric Hg(0) lowers the global atmospheric Hg burden by 660 Mg and reduces deposition to global oceans, which would receive an additional Hg deposition of 960 Mg per year without vegetation.
Lichen and mosses show higher Hg concentrations than vascular plants, and, whereas Hg in above-ground biomass is largely from atmospheric uptake, root Hg is from combined soil and atmospheric uptake.
The seasonality of atmospheric Hg(0) concentrations in the Northern Hemisphere is controlled by vegetation uptake. Simulations without vegetation show weak seasonal cycles and cannot reproduce observations.
Large knowledge gaps exist in understanding physiological and environmental controls of vegetation Hg uptake and transport within plants, limiting our mechanistic and molecular-level understanding of vegetation Hg uptake.
Improved model parameterizations and harmonized observational data of vegetation Hg uptake, along with whole-ecosystem Hg(0) exchange measurements, are needed to improve the assessment of vegetation impacts on global Hg cycling.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
The Roles of the Moss Layer in Mediating Tree Seedling Environmental Stress, Mercury Exposure, and Regeneration in High-Elevation Conifer Forests
Ecosystems Open Access 23 November 2022
Communications Earth & Environment Open Access 19 November 2022
Nature Communications Open Access 24 August 2022
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to Nature and 55 other Nature journal
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $6.58 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Obrist, D. et al. A review of global environmental mercury processes in response to human and natural perturbations: Changes of emissions, climate, and land use. Ambio 47, 116–140 (2018). Reviews Hg wet and dry deposition to terrestrial ecosystems, ocean Hg(0) evasion to the atmosphere, global aquatic Hg releases and predicts that land use and climate change impacts on Hg cycling will be large.
Obrist, D. et al. Tundra uptake of atmospheric elemental mercury drives Arctic mercury pollution. Nature 547, 201–204 (2017). Finds 71% of total Hg deposition over 2 years was derived from gaseous dry deposition of Hg(0), consistent with source characterization in plants and soils using stable Hg isotopes.
Mao, H., Cheng, I. & Zhang, L. Current understanding of the driving mechanisms for spatiotemporal variations of atmospheric speciated mercury: a review. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 12897–12924 (2016).
Selin, H. et al. Linking science and policy to support the implementation of the Minamata Convention on Mercury. Ambio 47, 198–215 (2018).
United Nations Environment Programme. UNEP chemicals and health branch. Geneva Environment Network https://www.genevaenvironmentnetwork.org/environment-geneva/organizations/unep-chemicals-and-waste-branch/ (2019).
Horowitz, H. M. et al. A new mechanism for atmospheric mercury redox chemistry: implications for the global mercury budget. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 6353–6371 (2017).
Kumar, A., Wu, S., Huang, Y., Liao, H. & Kaplan, J. O. Mercury from wildfires: Global emission inventories and sensitivity to 2000–2050 global change. Atmos. Environ. 173, 6–15 (2018).
Outridge, P. M., Mason, R. P., Wang, F., Guerrero, S. & Heimburger-Boavida, L. E. Updated global and oceanic mercury budgets for the United Nations Global Mercury Assessment 2018. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 11466–11477 (2018). Presents a current understanding of the global environmental Hg cycling by reporting estimates and uncertainties of global Hg emissions, fluxes and budgets.
Cohen, M. D. et al. Modeling the global atmospheric transport and deposition of mercury to the Great Lakes. Elementa Sci. Anthrop. 4, 000118 (2016).
Song, S. et al. Top-down constraints on atmospheric mercury emissions and implications for global biogeochemical cycling. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 7103–7125 (2015).
Zhang, Y. et al. A coupled global atmosphere-ocean model for air-sea exchange of mercury: Insights into wet deposition and atmospheric redox chemistry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 5052–5061 (2019).
Iverfeldt, Å. Mercury in forest canopy throughfall water and its relation to atmospheric deposition. Water Air Soil Pollut. 56, 553–564 (1991).
Munthe, J., Hultberg, H. & Iverfeldt, A. Mechanisms of deposition of methylmercury and mercury to coniferous forests. Water Air Soil Pollut. 80, 363–371 (1995).
Niu, Z. C., Zhang, X. S., Wang, Z. W. & Ci, Z. J. Field controlled experiments of mercury accumulation in crops from air and soil. Environ. Pollut. 159, 2684–2689 (2011).
Wang, J., Feng, X., Anderson, C. W., Xing, Y. & Shang, L. Remediation of mercury contaminated sites–a review. J. Hazard. Mater. 221-222, 1–18 (2012).
Ranieri, E. et al. Phytoextraction technologies for mercury- and chromium-contaminated soil: a review. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 95, 317–327 (2020).
Hou, D. et al. Metal contamination and bioremediation of agricultural soils for food safety and sustainability. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 366–381 (2020).
Grigal, D., Kolka, R., Fleck, J. & Nater, E. Mercury budget of an upland-peatland watershed. Biogeochemistry 50, 95–109 (2000).
Grigal, D. F. Mercury sequestration in forests and peatlands: A review. J. Environ. Qual. 32, 393–405 (2003).
St. Louis, V. et al. Importance of the forest canopy to fluxes of methyl mercury and total mercury to boreal ecosystems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35, 3089–3098 (2001).
Jiskra, M., Sonke, J. E., Agnan, Y., Helmig, D. & Obrist, D. Insights from mercury stable isotopes on terrestrial–atmosphere exchange of Hg(0) in the Arctic tundra. Biogeosciences 16, 4051–4064 (2019).
Uprety, S. & Cao, C. Radiometric comparison of 1.6-μm CO2 absorption band of Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) TANSO-FTS with Suomi-NPP VIIRS SWIR band. J. Atmos. Ocean Technol. 33, 1443–1453 (2016).
Jiskra, M. et al. A vegetation control on seasonal variations in global atmospheric mercury concentrations. Nat. Geosci. 11, 244–250 (2018). Shows terrestrial vegetation acts as a global Hg(0) pump, which controls seasonal variations of atmospheric Hg(0).
Obrist, D. et al. A synthesis of terrestrial mercury in the western United States: Spatial distribution defined by land cover and plant productivity. Sci. Total Environ. 568, 522–535 (2016).
Obrist, D. Mercury distribution across 14 U.S. forests. Part II: Patterns of methyl mercury concentrations and areal mass of total and methyl mercury. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 5921–5930 (2012).
Obrist, D. et al. Mercury distribution across 14 U.S. forests. Part I: Spatial patterns of concentrations in biomass, litter, and soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 3974–3981 (2011).
Evers, D. C. et al. Biological mercury hotspots in the northeastern United States and southeastern Canada. Bioscience 57, 29–43 (2007).
Driscoll, C. T. et al. Mercury contamination in forest and freshwater ecosystems in the northeastern United States. Bioscience 57, 17–28 (2007).
Fleck, J. A. et al. Mercury and methylmercury in aquatic sediment across western North America. Sci. Total. Environ. 568, 727–738 (2016).
Hsu-Kim, H. et al. Challenges and opportunities for managing aquatic mercury pollution in altered landscapes. Ambio 47, 141–169 (2018).
Shanley, J. B. et al. Comparison of total mercury and methylmercury cycling at five sites using the small watershed approach. Environ. Pollut. 154, 143–154 (2008).
Riscassi, A. L. & Scanlon, T. M. Particulate and dissolved mercury export in streamwater within three mid-Appalachian forested watersheds in the US. J. Hydrol. 501, 92–100 (2013).
Sonke, J. E. et al. Eurasian river spring flood observations support net Arctic Ocean mercury export to the atmosphere and Atlantic Ocean. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E11586–E11594 (2018).
Douglas, T. A. & Blum, J. D. Mercury isotopes reveal atmospheric gaseous mercury deposition directly to the Arctic coastal snowpack. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 6, 235–242 (2019).
Strok, M., Baya, P. A., Dietrich, D., Dimock, B. & Hintelmann, H. Mercury speciation and mercury stable isotope composition in sediments from the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Sci. Total. Environ. 671, 655–665 (2019).
Jiskra, M., Wiederhold, J. G., Skyllberg, U., Kronberg, R.-M. & Kretzschmar, R. Source tracing of natural organic matter bound mercury in boreal forest runoff with mercury stable isotopes. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 19, 1235–1248 (2017).
Janssen, S. et al. Chemical and physical controls on mercury source signatures in stream fish from the northeastern United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 10110–10119 (2019).
Madigan, D. et al. Mercury stable isotopes reveal influence of foraging depth on mercury concentrations and growth in Pacific bluefin tuna. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 6256–6264 (2018).
Li, M. et al. Environmental origins of methylmercury accumulated in subarctic estuarine fish indicated by mercury stable isotopes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 11559–11568 (2016).
Arnold, J., Gustin, M. S. & Weisberg, P. J. Evidence for nonstomatal uptake of Hg by aspen and translocation of Hg from foliage to tree rings in Austrian pine. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 1174–1182 (2018). Reveals Hg accumulation into tree rings via stomata and subsequent translocation by way of phloem, and highlights that the use of trees as temporal proxies requires further investigation.
Peckham, M. A., Gustin, M. S., Weisberg, P. J. & Weiss-Penzias, P. Results of a controlled field experiment to assess the use of tree tissue concentrations as bioindicators of air Hg. Biogeochemistry 142, 265–279 (2019).
Greger, M., Wang, Y. D. & Neuschutz, C. Absence of Hg transpiration by shoot after Hg uptake by roots of six terrestrial plant species. Environ. Pollut. 134, 201–208 (2005).
Stamenkovic, J. & Gustin, M. S. Nonstomatal versus stomatal uptake of atmospheric mercury. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 1367–1372 (2009).
Chiarantini, L. et al. Black pine (Pinus nigra) barks as biomonitors of airborne mercury pollution. Sci. Total. Environ. 569, 105–113 (2016).
Cocking, D., Rohrer, M., Thomas, R., Walker, J. & Ward, D. Effects of root morphology and Hg concentration in the soil on uptake by terrestrial vascular plants. Water Air Soil Pollut. 80, 1113–1116 (1995).
Juillerat, J. I., Ross, D. S. & Bank, M. S. Mercury in litterfall and upper soil horizons in forested ecosystems in Vermont, USA. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 31, 1720–1729 (2012).
Obrist, D., Johnson, D. W. & Edmonds, R. L. Effects of vegetation type on mercury concentrations and pools in two adjacent coniferous and deciduous forests. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 175, 68–77 (2012).
Laacouri, A., Nater, E. A. & Kolka, R. K. Distribution and uptake dynamics of mercury in leaves of common deciduous tree species in Minnesota, USA. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 10462–10470 (2013).
Lodenius, A., Tulisalo, E. & Soltanpour-Gargari, A. Exchange of mercury between atmosphere and vegetation under contaminated conditions. Sci. Total. Environ. 304, 169–174 (2003).
Fay, L. & Gustin, M. Assessing the influence of different atmospheric and soil mercury concentrations on foliar mercury concentrations in a controlled environment. Water Air Soil Pollut. 181, 373–384 (2007).
Niu, Z. et al. Field controlled experiments on the physiological responses of maize (Zea mays L.) leaves to low-level air and soil mercury exposures. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 21, 1541–1547 (2014).
Assad, M. et al. Mercury uptake into poplar leaves. Chemosphere 146, 1–7 (2016).
Millhollen, A. G., Gustin, M. S. & Obrist, D. Foliar mercury accumulation and exchange for three tree species. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 6001–6006 (2006).
Mao, Y., Li, Y., Richards, J. & Cai, Y. Investigating uptake and translocation of mercury species by sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense) using a stable isotope tracer technique. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 9678–9684 (2013).
Graydon, J. A. et al. Investigation of uptake and retention of atmospheric Hg(II) by boreal forest plants using stable Hg isotopes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 4960–4966 (2009).
Cui, L. W. et al. Accumulation and translocation of (198)Hg in four crop species. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 33, 334–340 (2014).
Yuan, W. et al. Stable isotope evidence shows re-emission of elemental mercury vapor occurring after reductive loss from foliage. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 651–660 (2019). Shows odd-MIF isotope fractionation during photochemical reduction and re-emission from foliage.
Olson, C. L., Jiskra, M., Sonke, J. E. & Obrist, D. Mercury in tundra vegetation of Alaska: Spatial and temporal dynamics and stable isotope patterns. Sci. Total Environ. 660, 1502–1512 (2019).
Sun, L., Lu, B., Yuan, D., Hao, W. & Zheng, Y. Variations in the isotopic composition of stable mercury isotopes in typical mangrove plants of the Jiulong estuary, SE China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 24, 1459–1468 (2017).
Graydon, J. A. et al. The role of terrestrial vegetation in atmospheric Hg deposition: Pools and fluxes of spike and ambient Hg from the METAALICUS experiment. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 26, GB1022 (2012).
Rutter, A. P. et al. Dry deposition of gaseous elemental mercury to plants and soils using mercury stable isotopes in a controlled environment. Atmos. Environ. 45, 848–855 (2011).
Bishop, K. H., Lee, Y. H., Munthe, J. & Dambrine, E. Xylem sap as a pathway for total mercury and methylmercury transport from soils to tree canopy in the boreal forest. Biogeochemistry 40, 101–113 (1998). Finds that 11% of the total Hg in litterfall was transported from soils to needles in xylem sap.
Beauford, W., Barber, J. & Barringer, A. Uptake and distribution of mercury within higher plants. Physiol. Plant. 39, 261–265 (1977).
Cavallini, A., Natali, L., Durante, M. & Maserti, B. Mercury uptake, distribution and DNA affinity in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) plants. Sci. Total. Environ. 243, 119–127 (1999).
Blackwell, B. D. & Driscoll, C. T. Using foliar and forest floor mercury concentrations to assess spatial patterns of mercury deposition. Environ. Pollut. 202, 126–134 (2015).
Amado Filho, G. M., Andrade, L. R., Farina, M. & Malm, O. Hg localisation in Tillandsia usneoides L. (Bromeliaceae), an atmospheric biomonitor. Atmos. Environ. 36, 881–887 (2002).
Du, S.-H. & Fang, S. C. Catalase activity of C3 and C4 species and its relationship to mercury vapor uptake. Environ. Exp. Botany 23, 347–353 (1983).
Leonard, T. L., Taylor, G. E., Gustin, M. S. & Fernandez, G. C. J. Mercury and plants in contaminated soils: 1. Uptake, partitioning, and emission to the atmosphere. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 17, 2063–2071 (1998).
Converse, A. D., Riscassi, A. L. & Scanlon, T. M. Seasonal variability in gaseous mercury fluxes measured in a high-elevation meadow. Atmos. Environ. 44, 2176–2185 (2010).
Fritsche, J. et al. Elemental mercury fluxes over a sub-alpine grassland determined with two micrometeorological methods. Atmos. Environ. 42, 2922–2933 (2008).
Fu, X. et al. Depletion of atmospheric gaseous elemental mercury by plant uptake at Mt. Changbai, Northeast China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 12861–12873 (2016).
Manceau, A., Wang, J., Rovezzi, M., Glatzel, P. & Feng, X. Biogenesis of mercury–sulfur nanoparticles in plant leaves from atmospheric gaseous mercury. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 3935–3948 (2018). Reports the formation of stable Hg sulfur nanoparticles in foliage based on spectroscopy.
Carrasco-Gil, S. et al. Mercury localization and speciation in plants grown hydroponically or in a natural environment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 3082–3090 (2013).
Carrasco-Gil, S. et al. Complexation of Hg with phytochelatins is important for plant Hg tolerance. Plant Cell Environ. 34, 778–791 (2011).
Niu, Z. et al. The linear accumulation of atmospheric mercury by vegetable and grass leaves: Potential biomonitors for atmospheric mercury pollution. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 20, 6337–6343 (2013).
Frescholtz, T. F., Gustin, M. S., Schorran, D. E. & Fernandez, G. C. J. Assessing the source of mercury in foliar tissue of quaking aspen. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 22, 2114–2119 (2003).
Zhou, J. et al. Mercury fluxes, budgets, and pools in forest ecosystems of China: A review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 1411–1450 (2020).
Gunda, T. & Scanlon, T. M. Topographical influences on the spatial distribution of soil mercury at the catchment scale. Water Air Soil Pollut. 224, 1511 (2013).
Lindberg, S. E., Hanson, P. J., Meyers, T. P. & Kim, K. H. Air/surface exchange of mercury vapor over forests - The need for a reassessment of continental biogenic emissions. Atmos. Environ. 32, 895–908 (1998).
Poissant, L., Pilote, M., Yumvihoze, E. & Lean, D. Mercury concentrations and foliage/atmosphere fluxes in a maple forest ecosystem in Québec, Canada. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 113, D10307 (2008).
Ericksen, J. A. & Gustin, M. S. Foliar exchange of mercury as a function of soil and air mercury concentrations. Sci. Total Environ. 324, 271–279 (2004).
Luo, Y. et al. Foliage/atmosphere exchange of mercury in a subtropical coniferous forest in south China. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 121, 2006–2016 (2016).
Teixeira, D. C., Lacerda, L. D. & Silva-Filho, E. V. Foliar mercury content from tropical trees and its correlation with physiological parameters in situ. Environ. Pollut. 242, 1050–1057 (2018).
Bacci, E., Gaggi, C., Duccini, M., Bargagli, R. & Renzoni, A. Mapping mercury vapours in an abandoned cinnabar mining area by azalea (Azalea indica) leaf trapping. Chemosphere 29, 641–656 (1994).
Du, S. H. & Fang, S. C. Uptake of elemental mercury vapor by C3 and C4 species. Environ. Exp. Botany 22, 437–443 (1982).
Battke, F., Ernst, D., Fleischmann, F. & Halbach, S. Phytoreduction and volatilization of mercury by ascorbate in Arabidopsis thaliana, European beech and Norway spruce. Appl. Geochem. 23, 494–502 (2008).
Wohlgemuth, L. et al. A bottom-up quantification of foliar mercury uptake fluxes across Europe. Biogeosciences 17, 6441–6456 (2020).
Ollerova, H., Maruskova, A., Kontrisova, O. & Pliestikova, L. Mercury accumulation in Picea abies (L.) Karst. needles with regard to needle age. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 19, 1401–1404 (2010).
Hutnik, R. J., McClenahen, J. R., Long, R. P. & Davis, D. D. Mercury accumulation in Pinus nigra (Austrian Pine). Northeast. Nat. 21, 529–540 (2014).
Navratil, T. et al. Decreasing litterfall mercury deposition in central European coniferous forests and effects of bark beetle infestation. Sci. Total Environ. 682, 213–225 (2019).
Hall, B. D. & Louis, V. L. S. Methylmercury and total mercury in plant litter decomposing in upland forests and flooded landscapes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38, 5010–5021 (2004).
Rasmussen, P. E., Mierle, G. & Nriagu, J. O. The analysis of vegetation for total mercury. Water Air Soil Pollut. 56, 379–390 (1991).
Zhang, H. H., Poissant, L., Xu, X. H. & Pilote, M. Explorative and innovative dynamic flux bag method development and testing for mercury air–vegetation gas exchange fluxes. Atmos. Environ. 39, 7481–7493 (2005).
Zhou, J., Wang, Z. W., Sun, T., Zhang, H. & Zhang, X. S. Mercury in terrestrial forested systems with highly elevated mercury deposition in southwestern China: The risk to insects and potential release from wildfires. Environ. Pollut. 212, 188–196 (2016).
Clackett, S. P., Porter, T. J. & Lehnherr, I. 400-year record of atmospheric mercury from tree-rings in Northwestern Canada. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 9625–9633 (2018).
Jung, R. & Ahn, Y. S. Distribution of mercury concentrations in tree rings and surface soils adjacent to a phosphate fertilizer plant in southern Korea. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 99, 253–257 (2017).
Kang, H. H. et al. Characterization of mercury concentration from soils to needle and tree rings of Schrenk spruce (Picea schrenkiana) of the middle Tianshan Mountains, northwestern China. Ecol. Indic. 104, 24–31 (2019).
Navratil, T. et al. Larch tree rings as a tool for reconstructing 20th century Central European atmospheric mercury trends. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 11060–11068 (2018).
Navratil, T. et al. The history of mercury pollution near the Spolana chlor-alkali plant (Neratovice, Czech Republic) as recorded by Scots pine tree rings and other bioindicators. Sci. Total. Environ. 586, 1182–1192 (2017).
Schneider, L., Allen, K., Walker, M., Morgan, C. & Haberle, S. Using tree rings to track atmospheric mercury pollution in Australia: The legacy of mining in Tasmania. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 5697–5706 (2019).
Wright, G., Woodward, C., Peri, L., Weisberg, P. J. & Gustin, M. S. Application of tree rings dendrochemistry for detecting historical trends in air Hg concentrations across multiple scales. Biogeochemistry 120, 149–162 (2014).
Hojdova, M. et al. Changes in mercury deposition in a mining and smelting region as recorded in tree rings. Water Air Soil Pollut. 216, 73–82 (2011).
Tangahu, B. V. et al. A review on heavy metals (As, Pb, and Hg) uptake by plants through phytoremediation. Int. J. Chem. Eng. 2011, 939161 (2011).
Farella, N., Lucotte, M., Davidson, R. & Daigle, S. Mercury release from deforested soils triggered by base cation enrichment. Sci. Total Environ. 368, 19–29 (2006).
Clemens, S. Toxic metal accumulation, responses to exposure and mechanisms of tolerance in plants. Biochimie 88, 1707–1719 (2006).
Clemens, S. & Ma, J. F. Toxic heavy metal and metalloid accumulation in crop plants and foods. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 67, 489–512 (2016).
Park, J. et al. The phytochelatin transporters AtABCC1 and AtABCC2 mediate tolerance to cadmium and mercury. Plant J. 69, 278–288 (2012).
Wang, J. J. et al. Fine root mercury heterogeneity: metabolism of lower-order roots as an effective route for mercury removal. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 769–777 (2012). Reports that the estimated Hg return flux from dead, fine roots outweighed that from leaf litter, and ephemeral first-order roots that constituted 7.2–22.3% of total fine root biomass might have contributed the most to this flux.
Zhou, J. et al. Influence of soil mercury concentration and fraction on bioaccumulation process of inorganic mercury and methylmercury in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22, 6144–6154 (2015).
Yin, R., Feng, X. & Meng, B. Stable mercury isotope variation in rice plants (Oryza sativa L.) from the Wanshan mercury mining district, SW China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 2238–2245 (2013).
Wang, X. et al. Underestimated sink of atmospheric mercury in a deglaciated forest chronosequence. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 8083–8093 (2020).
Rewald, B., Ephrath, J. E. & Rachmilevitch, S. A root is a root is a root? Water uptake rates of Citrus root orders. Plant Cell Environ. 34, 33–42 (2011).
Balabanova, B., Stafilov, T., Sajn, R. & Andonovska, K. B. Quantitative assessment of metal elements using moss species as biomonitors in downwind area of lead-zinc mine. J. Environ. Sci. Health A 52, 290–301 (2017).
Lopez Berdonces, M. A., Higueras, P. L., Fernandez-Pascual, M., Borreguero, A. M. & Carmona, M. The role of native lichens in the biomonitoring of gaseous mercury at contaminated sites. J. Environ. Manage. 186, 207–213 (2017).
Pradhan, A. et al. Heavy metal absorption efficiency of two species of mosses (Physcomitrella patens and Funaria hygrometrica) studied in mercury treated culture under laboratory condition. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 225, 012225 (2017).
Solberg, Y. & Selmerolsen, A. R. Studies on chemistry of lichens and mosses. 17. Mercury content of several lichen and moss species collected in Norway. Bryologist 81, 144–149 (1978).
Stankovic, J. D., Sabovljevic, A. D. & Sabovljevic, M. S. Bryophytes and heavy metals: a review. Acta Bot. Croat. 77, 109–118 (2018).
Hauck, M. & Runge, M. Occurrence of pollution-sensitive epiphytic lichens in woodlands affected by forest decline: a new hypothesis. Flora 194, 159–168 (1999).
Salemaa, M., Derome, J., Helmisaari, H. S., Nieminen, T. & Vanha-Majamaa, I. Element accumulation in boreal bryophytes, lichens and vascular plants exposed to heavy metal and sulfur deposition in Finland. Sci. Total Environ. 324, 141–160 (2004).
Lodenius, M. Dry and wet deposition of mercury near a chlor-alkali plant. Sci. Total Environ. 213, 53–56 (1998).
Zechmeister, H. G., Hohenwallner, D., Riss, A. & Hanus-Illnar, A. Variations in heavy metal concentrations in the moss species Abietinella abietina (Hedw.) Fleisch according to sampling time, within site variability and increase in biomass. Sci. Total Environ. 301, 55–65 (2003).
Bargagli, R. Moss and lichen biomonitoring of atmospheric mercury: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 572, 216–231 (2016). Highlights that cryptogams are good biomonitors of Hg natural/anthropogenic point sources, but estimates of air Hg concentrations and fluxes based on cryptogams are not reliable.
Wolterbeek, H. T. & Bode, P. Strategies in sampling and sample handling in the context of large-scale plant biomonitoring surveys of trace element air pollution. Sci. Total Environ. 176, 33–43 (1995).
Wolterbeek, H. T., Garty, J., Reis, M. A. & Freitas, M. C. Biomonitors in use: lichens and metal air pollution. Trace Metals Contam. Environ. 6, 377–419 (2003).
Dolegowska, S. & Migaszewski, Z. M. Plant sampling uncertainty: a critical review based on moss studies. Environ. Rev. 23, 151–160 (2015).
Tyler, G. Bryophytes and heavy metals: a literature review. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 104, 231–253 (1990).
Onianwa, P. C. Monitoring atmospheric metal pollution: A review of the use of mosses as indicators. Environ. Monit. Assess. 71, 13–50 (2001).
Wang, X., Yuan, W., Feng, X., Wang, D. & Luo, J. Moss facilitating mercury, lead and cadmium enhanced accumulation in organic soils over glacial erratic at Mt. Gongga, China. Environ. Pollut. 254, 112974 (2019).
Vannini, A., Nicolardi, V., Bargagli, R. & Loppi, S. Estimating atmospheric mercury concentrations with lichens. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 8754–8759 (2014).
Adamo, P. et al. Natural and pre-treatments induced variability in the chemical composition and morphology of lichens and mosses selected for active monitoring of airborne elements. Environ. Pollut. 152, 11–19 (2008).
Bargagli, R. The elemental composition of vegetation and the possible incidence of soil contamination of samples. Sci. Total Environ. 176, 121–128 (1995).
Bargagli, R. & Mikhailova, I. in Monitoring with Lichens - Monitoring Lichens Vol. 7 (eds Nimis, P. L., Scheidegger, P. L. & Wolseley, P. A.) 65–84 (Springer, 2002).
Nieboer, E. & Richardson, D. H. S. Lichens as monitors of atmospheric deposition. Abstr. Pap. Am. Chem. Soc. 146 (1979).
Walther, D. A. et al. Temporal changes in metal levels of the lichens Parmotrema praesorediosum and Ramalina stenospora, Southwest Louisiana. Water Air Soil Pollut. 53, 189–200 (1990).
Garty, J. Biomonitoring atmospheric heavy metals with lichens: Theory and application. Crit. Rev. Plant. Sci. 20, 309–371 (2001).
Nickel, S. et al. Modelling and mapping heavy metal and nitrogen concentrations in moss in 2010 throughout Europe by applying Random Forests models. Atmos. Environ. 156, 146–159 (2017).
Harmens, H. et al. Mosses as biomonitors of atmospheric heavy metal deposition: Spatial patterns and temporal trends in Europe. Environ. Pollut. 158, 3144–3156 (2010).
Frescholtz, T. F. & Gustin, M. S. Soil and foliar mercury emission as a function of soil concentration. Water Air Soil Pollut. 155, 223–237 (2004).
Canario, J. et al. Salt-marsh plants as potential sources of Hg-0 into the atmosphere. Atmos. Environ. 152, 458–464 (2017).
Graydon, J. A., St. Louis, V. L., Lindberg, S. E., Hintelmann, H. & Krabbenhoft, D. P. Investigation of mercury exchange between forest canopy vegetation and the atmosphere using a new dynamic chamber. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 4680–4688 (2006).
Battke, F., Ernst, D. & Halbach, S. Ascorbate promotes emission of mercury vapour from plants. Plant. Cell Environ. 28, 1487–1495 (2005).
Lindberg, S. E., Dong, W. J. & Meyers, T. Transpiration of gaseous elemental mercury through vegetation in a subtropical wetland in Florida. Atmos. Environ. 36, 5207–5219 (2002).
Ericksen, J. A. et al. Accumulation of atmospheric mercury in forest foliage. Atmos. Environ. 37, 1613–1622 (2003).
Fay, L. & Gustin, M. S. Investigation of mercury accumulation in cattails growing in constructed wetland mesocosms. Wetlands 27, 1056–1065 (2007).
Agnan, Y., Le Dantec, T., Moore, C. W., Edwards, G. C. & Obrist, D. New constraints on terrestrial surface atmosphere fluxes of gaseous elemental mercury using a global database. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 507–524 (2016). Using available terrestrial surface–atmosphere Hg(0) flux studies reveals that, based on the current measurements available, global assimilation by vegetation cannot be determined appropriately with global flux uncertainty ranging from a net deposition of 513 Mg to a net emission of 1,353 Mg per year.
Sommar, J., Osterwalder, S. & Zhu, W. Recent advances in understanding and measurement of Hg in the environment: Surface-atmosphere exchange of gaseous elemental mercury (Hg0). Sci. Total Environ. 721, 137648 (2020).
Hanson, P. J., Lindberg, S. E., Tabberer, T. A., Owens, J. G. & Kim, K. H. Foliar exchange of mercury-vapor - evidence for a compensation point. Water Air Soil Pollut. 80, 373–382 (1995).
Stamenkovic, J. et al. Atmospheric mercury exchange with a tallgrass prairie ecosystem housed in mesocosms. Sci. Total Environ. 406, 227–238 (2008).
Zhou, J., Wang, Z., Zhang, X. & Sun, T. Investigation of factors affecting mercury emission from subtropical forest soil: a field controlled study in southwestern China. J. Geochem. Explor. 176, 128–135 (2017).
Zhou, J., Wang, Z., Zhang, X., Driscoll, C. T. & Lin, C. J. Soil–atmosphere exchange flux of total gaseous mercury (TGM) at subtropical and temperate forest catchments. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2020, 16117–16133 (2020).
Bash, J. O. & Miller, D. R. Growing season total gaseous mercury (TGM) flux measurements over an Acer rubrum L. stand. Atmos. Environ. 43, 5953–5961 (2009).
Fritsche, J. et al. Summertime elemental mercury exchange of temperate grasslands on an ecosystem-scale. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8, 7709–7722 (2008).
Lee, X., Benoit, G. & Hu, X. Z. Total gaseous mercury concentration and flux over a coastal saltmarsh vegetation in Connecticut, USA. Atmos. Environ. 34, 4205–4213 (2000).
Slemr, F. et al. in Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Heavy Metals in the Environment Vol. 1 (ed Pirrone, N.) 497 (E3S Web of Conferences, 2013).
Yuan, W. et al. Process factors driving dynamic exchange of elemental mercury vapor over soil in broadleaf forest ecosystems. Atmos. Environ. 219, 117047 (2019).
Castro, M. S. & Moore, C. W. Importance of gaseous elemental mercury fluxes in western Maryland. Atmosphere 7, 110 (2016).
Osterwalder, S. et al. Mercury evasion from a boreal peatland shortens the timeline for recovery from legacy pollution. Sci. Rep. 7, 16022 (2017).
Yu, Q. et al. Gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) fluxes over canopy of two typical subtropical forests in south China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18, 495–509 (2018).
Baya, A. P. & Van Heyst, B. Assessing the trends and effects of environmental parameters on the behaviour of mercury in the lower atmosphere over cropped land over four seasons. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 8617–8628 (2010).
Zhu, W., Sommar, J., Lin, C. J. & Feng, X. Mercury vapor air–surface exchange measured by collocated micrometeorological and enclosure methods–Part II: Bias and uncertainty analysis. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 5359–5376 (2015).
Blum, J. D., Sherman, L. S. & Johnson, M. W. Mercury isotopes in earth and environmental sciences. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 42, 249–269 (2014).
Kwon, S. Y. et al. Mercury stable isotopes for monitoring the effectiveness of the Minamata Convention on Mercury. Earth Sci. Rev. 203, 103111 (2020).
Enrico, M. et al. Atmospheric mercury transfer to peat bogs dominated by gaseous elemental mercury dry deposition. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 2405–2412 (2016). Proposes Δ200Hg as a conservative tracer for atmospheric deposition pathways.
Gratz, L. E., Keeler, G. J., Blum, J. D. & Sherman, L. S. Isotopic composition and fractionation of mercury in Great Lakes precipitation and ambient air. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 7764–7770 (2010).
Chen, J., Hintelmann, H., Feng, X. & Dimock, B. Unusual fractionation of both odd and even mercury isotopes in precipitation from Peterborough, ON, Canada. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 90, 33–46 (2012).
Sherman, L. S., Blum, J. D., Keeler, G. J., Demers, J. D. & Dvonch, J. T. Investigation of local mercury deposition from a coal-fired power plant using mercury isotopes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 382–390 (2012).
Demers, J. D., Blum, J. D. & Zak, D. R. Mercury isotopes in a forested ecosystem: Implications for air-surface exchange dynamics and the global mercury cycle. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 27, 222–238 (2013). Demonstrates that dry deposition represents a major deposition pathway through the use of Hg stable isotopes.
Demers, J. D., Sherman, L. S., Blum, J. D., Marsik, F. J. & Dvonch, J. T. Coupling atmospheric mercury isotope ratios and meteorology to identify sources of mercury impacting a coastal urban-industrial region near Pensacola, Florida, USA. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 29, 1689–1705 (2015).
Wang, Z. et al. Mass-dependent and mass-independent fractionation of mercury isotopes in precipitation from Guiyang, SW China. C. R. Geosci. 347, 358–367 (2015).
Fu, X., Marusczak, N., Wang, X., Gheusi, F. & Sonke, J. E. Isotopic composition of gaseous elemental mercury in the free troposphere of the Pic du Midi observatory, France. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 5641–5650 (2016).
Yu, B. et al. Isotopic composition of atmospheric mercury in China: new evidence for sources and transformation processes in air and in vegetation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 9262–9269 (2016).
Tsui, M. T. et al. Sources and transfers of methylmercury in adjacent river and forest food webs. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 10957–10964 (2012).
Liu, H. -w. et al. Mercury isotopic compositions of mosses, conifer needles, and surface soils: Implications for mercury distribution and sources in Shergyla Mountain, Tibetan Plateau. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 172, 225–231 (2019).
Jiskra, M. et al. Mercury deposition and re-emission pathways in boreal forest soils investigated with Hg isotope signatures. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 7188–7196 (2015).
Zheng, W., Obrist, D., Weis, D. & Bergquist, B. A. Mercury isotope compositions across North American forests. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 30, 1475–1492 (2016).
Woerndle, G. E. et al. New insights on ecosystem mercury cycling revealed by stable isotopes of mercury in water flowing from a headwater peatland catchment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 1854–1861 (2018).
Fu, X. et al. Significant seasonal variations in isotopic composition of atmospheric total gaseous mercury at forest sites in China caused by vegetation and mercury sources. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 13748–13756 (2019).
Sun, R. et al. Modelling the mercury stable isotope distribution of Earth surface reservoirs: implications for global Hg cycling. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 246, 156–173 (2019).
Wang, X. et al. Climate and vegetation as primary drivers for global mercury storage in surface soil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 10665–10675 (2019).
Biswas, A., Blum, J. D., Bergquist, B. A., Keeler, G. J. & Xie, Z. Q. Natural mercury isotope variation in coal deposits and organic soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 8303–8309 (2008).
Guedron, S. et al. Mercury isotopic fractionation during pedogenesis in a tropical forest soil catena (French Guiana): Deciphering the impact of historical gold mining. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 11573–11582 (2018).
Grasby, S. E. et al. Isotopic signatures of mercury contamination in latest Permian oceans. Geology 45, 55–58 (2017).
Lepak, R. F. et al. Use of stable isotope signatures to determine mercury sources in the Great Lakes. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2, 335–341 (2015).
Araujo, B. F., Hintelmann, H., Dimock, B., Almeida, M. G. & Rezende, C. E. Concentrations and isotope ratios of mercury in sediments from shelf and continental slope at Campos Basin near Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Chemosphere 178, 42–50 (2017).
Gleason, J. D. et al. Sources and cycling of mercury in the paleo Arctic Ocean from Hg stable isotope variations in Eocene and Quaternary sediments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 197, 245–262 (2017).
Masbou, J. et al. Hg-stable isotope variations in marine top predators of the Western Arctic Ocean. ACS Earth Space Chem. 2, 479–490 (2018).
Fu, X. et al. Atmospheric wet and litterfall mercury deposition at urban and rural sites in China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 11547–11562 (2016).
Wright, L. P., Zhang, L. & Marsik, F. J. Overview of mercury dry deposition, litterfall, and throughfall studies. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 13399–13416 (2016).
Zhang, L. et al. The estimated six-year mercury dry deposition across North America. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 12864–12873 (2016). Shows that GEM dry deposition over vegetated surfaces will not decrease, and, sometimes, might even increase with decreasing anthropogenic emissions.
Wang, X., Bao, Z. D., Lin, C. J., Yuan, W. & Feng, X. B. Assessment of global mercury deposition through litterfall. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 8548–8557 (2016). First study to estimate the global spatial distribution and budget of Hg dry deposition via plant Hg uptake using comprehensive litterfall data.
Dastoor, A. P. et al. Modeling dynamic exchange of gaseous elemental mercury at polar sunrise. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 5183–5188 (2008).
Cooke, C. A., Martinez-Cortizas, A., Bindler, R. & Gustin, M. S. Environmental archives of atmospheric Hg deposition–A review. Sci. Total Environ. 709, 134800 (2020).
Zhang, H., Holmes, C. D. & Wu, S. Impacts of changes in climate, land use and land cover on atmospheric mercury. Atmos. Environ. 141, 230–244 (2016).
Melendez-Perez, J. J. et al. Soil and biomass mercury emissions during a prescribed fire in the Amazonian rain forest. Atmos. Environ. 96, 415–422 (2014).
Richardson, J. B. & Friedland, A. J. Mercury in coniferous and deciduous upland forests in northern New England, USA: implications of climate change. Biogeosciences 12, 6737–6749 (2015).
Yang, Y., Yanai, R. D., Driscoll, C. T., Montesdeoca, M. & Smith, K. T. Concentrations and content of mercury in bark, wood, and leaves in hardwoods and conifers in four forested sites in the northeastern USA. PLoS ONE 13, e0196293 (2018).
Zhou, J., Wang, Z. W., Zhang, X. S. & Gao, Y. Mercury concentrations and pools in four adjacent coniferous and deciduous upland forests in Beijing, China. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 122, 1260–1274 (2017).
Obrist, D. Atmospheric mercury pollution due to losses of terrestrial carbon pools? Biogeochemistry 85, 119–123 (2007).
Demers, J. D., Driscoll, C. T., Fahey, T. J. & Yavitt, J. B. Mercury cycling in litter and soil in different forest types in the Adirondack region, New York, USA. Ecol. Appl. 17, 1341–1351 (2007).
Heyes, A., Moore, T. R. & Rudd, J. W. M. Mercury and methylmercury in decomposing vegetation of a pristine and impounded wetland. J. Environ. Qual. 27, 591–599 (1998).
Wang, X. et al. Enhanced accumulation and storage of mercury on subtropical evergreen forest floor: Implications on mercury budget in global forest ecosystems. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 121, 2096–2109 (2016).
Zhou, J., Wang, Z. W. & Zhang, X. S. Deposition and fate of mercury in litterfall, litter, and soil in coniferous and broad-leaved forests. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 123, 2590–2603 (2018).
Yuan, W. et al. Stable mercury isotope transition during postdepositional decomposition of biomass in a forest ecosystem over five centuries. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 8739–8749 (2020).
Pokharel, A. K. & Obrist, D. Fate of mercury in tree litter during decomposition. Biogeosciences 8, 2507–2521 (2011).
Lim, A. G. et al. A revised pan-Arctic permafrost soil Hg pool based on Western Siberian peat Hg and carbon observations. Biogeosciences 17, 3083–3097 (2020).
Wright, L. P. & Zhang, L. An approach estimating bidirectional air-surface exchange for gaseous elemental mercury at AMNet sites. J. Adv. Model Earth Syst. 7, 35–49 (2015).
Zhu, W. et al. Global observations and modeling of atmosphere–surface exchange of elemental mercury: a critical review. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 4451–4480 (2016). Reviews the state of science in the atmosphere–surface exchange mechanisms, observation techniques and model parameterizations.
Wesely, M. L. & Hicks, B. B. A review of the current status of knowledge on dry deposition. Atmos. Environ. 34, 2261–2282 (2000).
Christensen, J. H., Brandt, J., Frohn, L. M. & Skov, H. Modelling of mercury in the Arctic with the Danish Eulerian Hemispheric Model. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 4, 2251–2257 (2004).
Dastoor, A. et al. Atmospheric mercury in the Canadian Arctic. Part II: Insight from modeling. Sci. Total. Environ. 509, 16–27 (2015).
De Simone, F., Gencarelli, C. N., Hedgecock, I. M. & Pirrone, N. Global atmospheric cycle of mercury: a model study on the impact of oxidation mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 21, 4110–4123 (2014).
Holmes, C. D., Jacob, D. J., Soerensen, A. L. & Corbitt, E. S. Global atmospheric budget of mercury including oxidation of Hg(0) by bromine atoms. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 74, A413–A413 (2010).
Travnikov, O. & Ilyin, I. in Mercury Fate and Transport in the Global Atmosphere (eds Pirrone, N. & Mason, R.) 571–587 (Springer, 2009).
Kerkweg, A. et al. An implementation of the dry removal processes DRY DEPosition and SEDImentation in the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 6, 4617–4632 (2006).
Wesely, M. L. & Lesht, B. M. Comparison of RADM dry deposition algorithms with a site-specific method for inferring dry deposition. Water Air Soil Pollut. 44, 273–293 (1989).
Zhang, L., Brook, J. & Vet, R. A revised parameterization for gaseous dry deposition in air-quality models. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 3, 2067–2082 (2003).
Zhang, L., Wright, L. P. & Blanchard, P. A review of current knowledge concerning dry deposition of atmospheric mercury. Atmos. Environ. 43, 5853–5864 (2009).
Huang, J., Miller, M. B., Edgerton, E. & Gustin, M. S. Deciphering potential chemical compounds of gaseous oxidized mercury in Florida, USA. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 1689–1698 (2017).
Travnikov, O. et al. Multi-model study of mercury dispersion in the atmosphere: atmospheric processes and model evaluation. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 5271–5295 (2017). Reviews global Hg models and their differences, uncertainties and evaluation with measurements.
Bash, J. O., Miller, D. R., Meyer, T. H. & Bresnahan, P. A. Northeast United States and Southeast Canada natural mercury emissions estimated with a surface emission model. Atmos. Environ. 38, 5683–5692 (2004).
Durnford, D. et al. How relevant is the deposition of mercury onto snowpacks?–Part 2: A modeling study. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 9251–9274 (2012).
Fisher, L. S. & Wolfe, M. H. Examination of mercury inputs by throughfall and litterfall in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Atmos. Environ. 47, 554–559 (2012).
Gbor, P. K. et al. Improved model for mercury emission, transport and deposition. Atmos. Environ. 40, 973–983 (2006).
Lin, C. J., Lindberg, S. E., Ho, T. C. & Jang, C. Development of a processor in BEIS3 for estimating vegetative mercury emission in the continental United States. Atmos. Environ. 39, 7529–7540 (2005).
Selin, N. E. et al. Global 3-D land-ocean-atmosphere model for mercury: Present-day versus preindustrial cycles and anthropogenic enrichment factors for deposition. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 22, GB2011 (2008).
Shetty, S. K., Lin, C.-J., Streets, D. G. & Jang, C. Model estimate of mercury emission from natural sources in East Asia. Atmos. Environ. 42, 8674–8685 (2008).
Smith-Downey, N. V., Sunderland, E. M. & Jacob, D. J. Anthropogenic impacts on global storage and emissions of mercury from terrestrial soils: Insights from a new global model. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 115, G03008 (2010).
Xu, X. H., Yang, X. S., Miller, D. R., Helble, J. J. & Carley, R. J. Formulation of bi-directional atmosphere-surface exchanges of elemental mercury. Atmos. Environ. 33, 4345–4355 (1999).
Bash, J. O. Description and initial simulation of a dynamic bidirectional air-surface exchange model for mercury in Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 115, D06305 (2010). Describes the most comprehensive scheme for modelling bidirectional Hg exchange fluxes over the vegetation canopy by defining dynamic compensation points based on partitioning coefficients across air–foliage and air–soil surfaces.
Wang, X., Lin, C. J. & Feng, X. Sensitivity analysis of an updated bidirectional air–surface exchange model for elemental mercury vapor. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 6273–6287 (2014).
Lin, C.-J. et al. Scientific uncertainties in atmospheric mercury models I: Model science evaluation. Atmos. Environ. 40, 2911–2928 (2006).
Graydon, J. A. et al. Investigation of uptake and retention of atmospheric Hg(II) by boreal forest plants using stable Hg isotopes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 4960–4966 (2009).
Zhang, H. et al. Assessing air–surface exchange and fate of mercury in a subtropical forest using a novel passive exchange-meter device. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 4869–4879 (2019).
Khan, T. R., Obrist, D., Agnan, Y., Selin, N. E. & Perlinger, J. A. Atmosphere-terrestrial exchange of gaseous elemental mercury: parameterization improvement through direct comparison with measured ecosystem fluxes. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 21, 1699–1712 (2019). Demonstrates that the use of resistance-based models combined with the new soil re-emission flux parameterization is able to reproduce observed diel and seasonal patterns of Hg(0) exchange in these ecosystems.
Dastoor, A. P. & Larocque, Y. Global circulation of atmospheric mercury: a modelling study. Atmos. Environ. 38, 147–161 (2004).
Fraser, A., Dastoor, A. & Ryjkov, A. How important is biomass burning in Canada to mercury contamination? Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18, 7263–7286 (2018).
Kos, G. et al. Evaluation of discrepancy between measured and modelled oxidized mercury species. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 4839–4863 (2013).
Angot, H. et al. Global and local impacts of delayed mercury mitigation efforts. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 12968–12977 (2018).
Kwon, S. Y. & Selin, N. E. Uncertainties in atmospheric mercury modeling for policy evaluation. Curr. Pollut. Rep. 2, 103–114 (2016).
Vorholt, J. Microbial life in the phyllosphere. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 828–840 (2012).
Cole, A. et al. Ten-year trends of atmospheric mercury in the high Arctic compared to Canadian sub-Arctic and mid-latitude sites. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 1535–1545 (2013).
Gay, D. A. et al. The Atmospheric Mercury Network: measurement and initial examination of an ongoing atmospheric mercury record across North America. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 11339–11349 (2013).
Tørseth, K. et al. Introduction to the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) and observed atmospheric composition change during 1972–2009. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 5447–5481 (2012).
Sprovieri, F. et al. Atmospheric mercury concentrations observed at ground-based monitoring sites globally distributed in the framework of the GMOS network. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 11915–11935 (2016).
Custodio, D., Ebinghaus, R., Spain, T. G. & Bieser, J. Source apportionment of atmospheric mercury in the remote marine atmosphere: Mace Head GAW station, Irish western coast. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20, 7929–7939 (2020).
Slemr, F. et al. Atmospheric mercury in the Southern Hemisphere–Part 1: Trend and inter-annual variations in atmospheric mercury at Cape Point, South Africa, in 2007–2017, and on Amsterdam Island in 2012–2017. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20, 7683–7692 (2020).
Slemr, F. et al. Comparison of mercury concentrations measured at several sites in the Southern Hemisphere. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 3125–3133 (2015).
Howard, D. et al. Atmospheric mercury in the Southern Hemisphere tropics: seasonal and diurnal variations and influence of inter-hemispheric transport. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 11623–11636 (2017).
McLagan, D. S. et al. Global evaluation and calibration of a passive air sampler for gaseous mercury. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18, 5905–5919 (2018).
Liu, Z. et al. A review on phytoremediation of mercury contaminated soils. J. Hazard. Mater. 400, 123138 (2020).
Anjum, N. A., Duarte, A. C., Pereira, E. & Ahmad, I. Juncus maritimus root biochemical assessment for its mercury stabilization potential in Ria de Aveiro coastal lagoon (Portugal). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22, 2231–2238 (2015).
Shehu, J. et al. Hyperaccumulators of mercury in the industrial area of a PVC factory in Vlora (Albania). Arch. Biol. Sci. 66, 1457–1463 (2014).
Qian, X. et al. Total mercury and methylmercury accumulation in wild plants grown at wastelands composed of mine tailings: Insights into potential candidates for phytoremediation. Environ. Pollut. 239, 757–767 (2018).
Pogrzeba, M. et al. Dactylis glomerata L. cultivation on mercury contaminated soil and its physiological response to granular sulphur aided phytostabilization. Environ. Pollut. 255, 113271 (2019).
Moreno, F. N. et al. Effect of thioligands on plant-Hg accumulation and volatilisation from mercury-contaminated mine tailings. Plant Soil 275, 233–246 (2005).
Rascio, N. & Navari-Izzo, F. Heavy metal hyperaccumulating plants: How and why do they do it? And what makes them so interesting? Plant Sci. 180, 169–181 (2011).
Wang, J. et al. Ammonium thiosulphate enhanced phytoextraction from mercury contaminated soil–Results from a greenhouse study. J. Hazard. Mater. 186, 119–127 (2011).
Franchi, E. et al. Phytoremediation of a multi contaminated soil: mercury and arsenic phytoextraction assisted by mobilizing agent and plant growth promoting bacteria. J. Soil. Sediment. 17, 1224–1236 (2017).
Smolinska, B. The influence of compost and nitrilotriacetic acid on mercury phytoextraction by Lepidium sativum L. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 95, 950–958 (2020).
Wang, J. et al. Thiosulphate-induced phytoextraction of mercury in Brassica juncea: Spectroscopic investigations to define a mechanism for Hg uptake. Environ. Pollut. 242, 986–993 (2018).
Fan, Y. et al. Phytoextraction potential of soils highly polluted with cadmium using the cadmium/zinc hyperaccumulator Sedum plumbizincicola. Int. J. Phytoremediation 21, 733–741 (2019).
We would like to thank X. Wang and C.-J. Lin for providing us with Hg litterfall deposition fluxes and biome geospatial boundary masks that allowed us to compare model results with litterfall deposition for various biomes of the world. We thank the three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. Funding was provided by the US National Science Foundation (AGS award no. 1848212 and DEB award no. 2027038). M.J. acknowledges funding from the Swiss National Science Foundation grant PZ00P2_174101. We thank James Gray for editorial comments on the manuscript.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Earth & Environment thanks Charles Driscoll, Karin Eklof and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
- Minamata Convention on Mercury
An international treaty named after the city of Minamata in Japan that experienced devastating Hg contamination in the 1950s.
- Legacy emissions
Re-volatilization of past atmospheric deposition from anthropogenic and geogenic sources stored in surface reservoirs, such as soils and water.
- Vascular plants
Group of plants with specialized tissues that include coniferous and flowering plants.
Apertures in leaves that control gas exchange (such as carbon dioxide and water vapour) between plants and the atmosphere.
Outer protective layers on epidermal cells of leaves, often consisting of waxy, water-repellent substances.
- Non-vascular vegetation
Plants that do not have specialized vascular tissues, which include algae, mosses, livermorts and hornworts; lichen are often grouped into this category, although they are symbiotic partnerships between a fungus and an alga.
The study of plant function and behaviour, including growth, metabolism, reproduction, defence and communication.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, J., Obrist, D., Dastoor, A. et al. Vegetation uptake of mercury and impacts on global cycling. Nat Rev Earth Environ 2, 269–284 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00146-y
This article is cited by
Communications Earth & Environment (2022)
Pollution characteristics and health risk assessment of potentially toxic elements in soils around China’s gold mines: a meta-analysis
Environmental Geochemistry and Health (2022)
Estimation of mercury emissions from the forest floor of a pine plantation during a wildfire in central Portugal
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment (2022)
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology (2022)
Spatial–temporal variations and pollution risks of mercury in water and sediments of urban lakes in Guangzhou City, South China
Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2022)