Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY

A cautionary tale from the machine scientist

Machine reading and knowledge extraction methods can be used to mine the scientific literature and reveal the direction and robustness of discoveries. Such efforts now point to the importance of independent tests of reported claims.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Enlightenment salon.

Art Collection 2 / Alamy Stock Photo

References

  1. Belikov, A. V., Rzhetsky, A. & Evans, J. Nat. Mach. Intell. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00474-8 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. King, R. et al. Nature 427, 247–252 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schmidt, M. & Lipson, H. Science 324, 81–85 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Evans, J. & Rzhetsky, A. Science 329, 399–400 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Guimerà, R. et al. Sci. Adv. 6, eaav6971 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D. & Ioannidis, J. P. A. Sci. Transl. Med. 8, 341ps12 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nissen, S. B., Magidson, T., Gross, K. & Bergstrom, C. T. eLife 5, e21451 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stoeger, T., Gerlach, M., Morimoto, R. I. & Amaral, L. A. N. PLoS Biol. 16, e2006643 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Danchev, V., Rzhetsky, A. & Evans, J. A. eLife 8, e43094 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lemaitre, B. FEBS J. 284, 875–882 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Amaral, L. A. N. https://amaral.northwestern.edu/blog/how-do-we-tell-whether-scientific-technology-has-r (2019).

  12. Alberts, B., Kirschner, M. W., Tilghman, S. & Varmus, H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5773–5777 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luís A. Nunes Amaral.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amaral, L.A.N. A cautionary tale from the machine scientist. Nat Mach Intell 4, 416–417 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00491-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00491-7

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing