There is no shortage of opinions on the impact of artificial intelligence and deep learning. We invited authors of Comment and Perspective articles that we published in roughly the first half of 2019 to look back at the year and give their thoughts on how the issue they wrote about developed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Public attitudes value interpretability but prioritize accuracy in Artificial Intelligence
Nature Communications Open Access 03 October 2022
Access options
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to Nature and 55 other Nature journal
$29.99
monthly
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
$99.00
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
$32.00
All prices are NET prices.
References
Heaven, D. Nature 574, 163–166 (2019).
Adams, R. AI & Soc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00918-7 (2019).
Rahwan, I. et al. Nature 568, 477–486 (2019).
Ramos, J., Wang, A. & Kim, S. Human reflexes help MIT’s HERMES rescue robot keep its footing. IEEE Spectrum https://go.nature.com/3580D0M (2019).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rich, A.S., Rudin, C., Jacoby, D.M.P. et al. AI reflections in 2019. Nat Mach Intell 2, 2–9 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0141-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0141-1
This article is cited by
-
Public attitudes value interpretability but prioritize accuracy in Artificial Intelligence
Nature Communications (2022)
-
Contributions from the Catholic Church to ethical reflections in the digital era
Nature Machine Intelligence (2020)