Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

The hidden sustainability cost of the reproducibility crisis

Nature Reviews Physics volume 6, pages 4–5 (2024)Cite this article

Subjects

Reproducibility is known to be one of the biggest issues facing science today — but what is less discussed is its connection to science’s environmental impact, as experiments that aren’t replicable still consume resources. Joanna Marshall-Cook and Martin Farley describe processes that can both improve sustainability in science and help tackle the reproducibility crisis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Percentages of 1,576 surveyed scientists who had ever failed to reproduce an experiment.

References

  1. Heye, T. et al. The energy consumption of radiology: energy- and cost-saving opportunities for CT and MRI operation. Radiology 295, 593–605 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ravilious, K. CERN’s emissions equal to a large cruise liner, says report. Physics World https://physicsworld.com/a/cerns-emissions-equal-to-a-large-cruise-liner-says-report/ (2020).

  3. Jones, N. How to stop data centres from gobbling up the world’s electricity. Nature 561, 163–166 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. UNESCO. The race against time for smarter development. UNESCO https://www.unesco.org/reports/science/2021/en (2021).

  5. Prinz, F., Schlange, T. & Asadullah, K. Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 10, 712 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baker, M. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature 533, 452–454 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Marek, S. et al. Reproducible brain-wide association studies require thousands of individuals. Nature 603, 654–660 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Urbina, M., Watts, A. & Reardon, E. Labs should cut plastic waste too. Nature 528, 479 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. From exploration to enterprise. Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 75 (2022).

  10. Mische, S. M. et al. A review of the scientific rigor, reproducibility, and transparency studies conducted by the ABRF research groups. J. Biomol. Tech. 31, 11–26 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University College London, London, UK

    Joanna Marshall-Cook & Martin Farley

Authors
  1. Joanna Marshall-Cook
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin Farley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Farley.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marshall-Cook, J., Farley, M. The hidden sustainability cost of the reproducibility crisis. Nat Rev Phys 6, 4–5 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-023-00674-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-023-00674-0

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing