Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

When scientists disagree

Stephen Blundell ponders the history of disagreements between scientists — from the ancient Greeks to questions about room-temperature superconductivity — and what they show about how to disagree well.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Newton, I. Letter to Edmund Halley on the Doctrine of Projectiles and Motions of the Heavens https://www.newtonproject.ox.ac.uk/catalogue/record/NATP00325 (1686).

  2. Gregory, J. Fred Hoyle’s Universe (Oxford Univ. Press, 2005).

  3. Alexander, R. G. The Leibniz–Clarke Correspondence (Manchester Univ. Press, 1977).

  4. Duhem, P. Le Mixte et la Combinaison Chimique: Essai sur l’évolution d’une Idée (C. Naud, 1902).

  5. Blundell, S. J. Superconductivity – A Very Short Introduction (Oxford Univ. Press, 2008).

  6. Taubes, G. Nobel Dreams (Random House, 1988).

  7. Lee, S. et al. The first room-temperature ambient-pressure superconductor. Preprint at https://arXiv.org/abs/2307.12008 (2023).

  8. Garisto, D. Allegations of scientific misconduct mount as physicist makes his biggest claim yet. Physics 16, 40 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jain, P. Phase transition of copper (I) sulfide and its implication for purported superconductivity of LK-99. Preprint at https://arXiv.org/abs/2308.05222 (2023).

  10. Shapin, S. A Social History of Truth (Univ. Chicago Press, 1994).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen J. Blundell.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blundell, S.J. When scientists disagree. Nat Rev Phys 5, 628–629 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-023-00647-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-023-00647-3

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing