As the total value of the global financial market outgrew the value of the real economy, financial institutions created a global web of interactions that embodies systemic risks. Understanding these networks requires new theoretical approaches and new tools for quantitative analysis. Statistical physics contributed significantly to this challenge by developing new metrics and models for the study of financial network structure, dynamics, and stability and instability. In this Review, we introduce network representations originating from different financial relationships, including direct interactions such as loans, similarities such as co-ownership and higher-order relations such as contracts involving several parties (for example, credit default swaps) or multilayer connections (possibly extending to the real economy). We then review models of financial contagion capturing the diffusion and impact of shocks across each of these systems. We also discuss different notions of ‘equilibrium’ in economics and statistical physics, and how they lead to maximum entropy ensembles of graphs, providing tools for financial network inference and the identification of early-warning signals of system-wide instabilities.
Modelling the financial system as a network is crucial to capture the complex interactions between financial institutions.
Such a network is naturally a time-dependent multiplex, because relationships between financial institutions are of many different kinds and keep changing.
Models of financial contagion enable understanding of how shocks propagate from one financial institution to another.
Missing information on financial networks can be ‘reconstructed’ using maximum entropy approaches borrowed from statistical mechanics.
Techniques based on financial networks have been adopted by practitioners and policy institutions.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Scientific Reports Open Access 28 July 2022
Nature Communications Open Access 14 June 2022
Scientific Reports Open Access 11 May 2022
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to the entire Nature family of 50+ journals
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Lazer, D. et al. Computational social science. Science 323, 721–723 (2009).
Pentland, A. Social Physics: How Good Ideas Spread-The Lessons from a New Science (Penguin, 2014).
Buchanan, M. The Social Atom: Why the Rich Get Richer, Cheaters Get Caught, and Your Neighbor Usually Looks Like You (Bloomsbury, 2008).
Ball, P. Why Society is a Complex Matter: Meeting Twenty-first Century Challenges with a New Kind of Science (Springer, 2012).
Caldarelli, G., Wolf, S. & Moreno, Y. Physics of humans, physics for society. Nat. Phys. 14, 870–870 (2018).
Auyang, S. Y. Foundations of Complex-system Theories: In Economics, Evolutionary Biology, and Statistical Physics (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1998).
Mantegna, R. N. & Stanley, H. E. An Introduction to Econophysics: Correlations and Complexity in Finance (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1999).
Barabási, A.-L. The network takeover. Nat. Phys. 8, 14–16 (2012).
Castellano, C., Fortunato, S. & Loreto, V. Statistical physics of social dynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 591–646 (2009).
Pastor-Satorras, R., Castellano, C., Van Mieghem, P. & Vespignani, A. Epidemic processes in complex networks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 925–979 (2015).
Perc, M. et al. Statistical physics of human cooperation. Phys. Rep. 687, 1–51 (2017).
Cimini, G. et al. The statistical physics of real-world networks. Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 58–71 (2019).
May, R. M. & Arinaminpathy, N. Systemic risk: the dynamics of model banking systems. J. R. Soc. Interface 7, 823–838 (2010).
Beale, N. et al. Individual versus systemic risk and the regulator’s dilemma. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 12647–12652 (2011).
Battiston, S., Puliga, M., Kaushik, R., Tasca, P. & Caldarelli, G. DebtRank: too central to fail? Financial networks, the Fed and systemic risk. Sci. Rep. 2, 541 (2012).
Battiston, S. et al. Complexity theory and financial regulation. Science 351, 818–819 (2016).
Cimini, G., Squartini, T., Garlaschelli, D. & Gabrielli, A. Systemic risk analysis on reconstructed economic and financial networks. Sci. Rep. 5, 15758 (2015). In this paper the entropy-based approach is tailored to the reconstruction of financial networks.
Battiston, S., Caldarelli, G., May, R. M., Roukny, T. & Stiglitz, J. E. The price of complexity in financial networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 10031–10036 (2016).
Iori, G., Jafarey, S. & Padilla, F. G. Systemic risk on the interbank market. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 61, 525–542 (2006).
Henry, J. & Kok, C. (eds) A macro stress testing framework for assessing systemic risks in the banking sector. Occasional Paper Series, no. 152. European Central Bank https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpops/ecbocp152.pdf (2013).
Abad, J. et al. Shedding light on dark markets: first insights from the new EU-wide OTC derivatives dataset. Occasional Paper Series, no. 11. European Systemic Risk Board https://www.esrb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/occasional/20160922_occasional_paper_11.en.pdf (2016).
Churm, R. & Nahai-Williamson, P. in Stress Testing: Approaches, Methods and Applications 2nd edn (eds Siddique, A., Hasan, I. & Lynch, D.) (Risk Books, 2019).
Allen, F. & Babus, A. in The Network Challenge: Strategy, Profit, and Risk in an Interlinked World (eds Kleindorfer, P. R. & Wind, Y.) 367–382 (Wharton School Publishing, 2009).
Elliott, M., Golub, B. & Jackson, M. O. Financial networks and contagion. Am. Econ. Rev. 104, 3115–3153 (2014).
Acemoglu, D., Ozdaglar, A. & Tahbaz-Salehi, A. Systemic risk and stability in financial networks. Am. Econ. Rev. 105, 564–608 (2015).
Stiglitz, J. E. Risk and global economic architecture: Why full financial integration may be undesirable. Am. Econ. Rev. 100, 388–392 (2010).
Haldane, A. G. Rethinking the financial network. Speech given at the Financial Student Association, Amsterdam. Bank of England https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/speech/2009/rethinking-the-financial-network (2009).
Yellen, J. L. Interconnectedness and systemic risk – lessons from the financial crisis and policy implications. Speech by Ms Janet L Yellen, Vice Chair of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, at the American Economic Association/American Finance Association Joint Luncheon, San Diego, California, 4 January 2013. Bank for International Settlements https://www.bis.org/review/r130107a.pdf (2013).
Draghi, M. Building on the achievements of post-crisis reforms. Speech by Mario Draghi, President of the ECB and Chair of the European Systemic Risk Board, at the second annual conference of the ESRB, Frankfurt am Main, 21 September 2017. European Central Bank https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2017/html/ecb.sp170921.en.html (2017).
Glasserman, P. & Young, H. P. Contagion in financial networks. J. Econ. Lit. 54, 779–831 (2016).
International Money Fund. World economic outlook report: October 2018. International Monetary Fund https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2018/09/24/world-economic-outlook-october-2018 (2018).
Bardoscia, M., Battiston, S., Caccioli, F. & Caldarelli, G. Pathways towards instability in financial networks. Nat. Commun. 8, 14416 (2017). This paper connects the stability of financial networks to the presence of specific topological structures.
Roukny, T., Battiston, S. & Stiglitz, J. E. Interconnectedness as a source of uncertainty in systemic risk. J. Financial Stab. 35, 93–106 (2018).
Colander, D. et al. The financial crisis and the systemic failure of the economics profession. Crit. Rev. 21, 249–267 (2009).
Weber, M. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (Univ. California Press, 1978).
Hill, J. G. & Thomas, R. S. (eds) Research Handbook on Shareholder Power (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015).
Kogut, B. & Walker, G. The small world of Germany and the durability of national networks. Am. Sociol. Rev. 66, 317–335 (2001).
Corrado, R. & Zollo, M. Small worlds evolving: governance reforms, privatizations, and ownership networks in Italy. Ind. Corp. Change 15, 319–352 (2006).
Fichtner, J., Heemskerk, E. M. & Garcia-Bernardo, J. Hidden power of the Big Three? Passive index funds, re-concentration of corporate ownership, and new financial risk. Bus. Politics 19, 298–326 (2017).
Garlaschelli, S., Castri, M. & Servedio, G. The scale free nature of market investment networks. Physica A 350, 491–499 (2005).
Glattfelder, J. B. & Battiston, S. Backbone of complex networks of corporations: the flow of control. Phys. Rev. E 80, 036104 (2009).
Vitali, S., Glattfelder, J. B. & Battiston, S. The network of global corporate control. PLoS ONE 6, e25995 (2011).
Vitali, S. & Battiston, S. The community structure of the global corporate network. PLoS ONE 9, e104655 (2014).
Vitali, S. & Battiston, S. Geography versus topology in the European ownership network. New J. Phys. 13, 63021 (2011).
Glattfelder, J. B. & Battiston, S. The architecture of power: Patterns of disruption and stability in the global ownership network. Social Science Research Network https://ssrn.com/abstract=3314648 (2019).
Boss, M., Elsinger, H., Summer, M. & Thurner, S. Network topology of the interbank market. Quant. Finance 4, 677–684 (2004). This is one of the first papers to empirically characterize a real-world (the Austrian) interbank network.
Soramäki, K., Bech, M. L., Arnold, J., Glass, R. J. & Beyeler, W. E. The topology of interbank payment flows. Physica A 379, 317–333 (2007).
Müller, J. Interbank credit lines as a channel of contagion. J. Financial Serv. Res. 29, 37–60 (2006).
De Masi, G., Iori, G. & Caldarelli, G. Fitness model for the Italian interbank money market. Phys. Rev. E 74, 066112 (2006).
Iori, G., De Masi, G., Precup, O. V., Gabbi, G. & Caldarelli, G. A network analysis of the Italian overnight money market. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 32, 259–278 (2008). This paper provides an empirical characterization of the network of the Italian segment of the European overnight money.
Iazzetta, C. & Manna, M. The topology of the interbank market: developments in Italy since 1990. Social Science Research Network https://ssrn.com/abstract=1478472 (2009).
Finger, K., Fricke, D. & Lux, T. Network analysis of the e-MID overnight money market: the informational value of different aggregation levels for intrinsic dynamic processes. Comput. Manag. Sci. 10, 187–211 (2013).
Demiralp, S., Preslopsky, B. & Whitesell, W. Overnight interbank loan markets. J. Econ. Bus. 58, 67–83 (2006).
Bech, M. L. & Atalay, E. The topology of the federal funds market. Physica A 389, 5223–5246 (2010).
Degryse, H. & Nguyen, G. et al. Interbank exposures: An empirical examination of contagion risk in the Belgian banking system. Int. J. Cent. Bank. 3, 123–171 (2007).
Cajueiro, D. O. & Tabak, B. M. The role of banks in the Brazilian interbank market: does bank type matter? Physica A 387, 6825–6836 (2008).
e Santos, E. B. & Cont, R. The Brazilian interbank network structure and systemic risk. Working Paper n. 219. Banco Central do Brasil https://www.bcb.gov.br/pec/wps/ingl/wps219.pdf (2010).
Imakubo, K. & Soejima, Y. et al. The transaction network in Japan’s interbank money markets. Monet. Econ. Stud. 28, 107–150 (2010).
Squartini, T., van Lelyveld, I. & Garlaschelli, D. Early-warning signals of topological collapse in interbank networks. Sci. Rep. 3, 3357 (2013).
León, C. & Berndsen, R. J. Rethinking financial stability: challenges arising from financial networks’ modular scale-free architecture. J. Financial Stab. 15, 241–256 (2014).
Craig, B. & Von Peter, G. Interbank tiering and money center banks. J. Financ. Intermed. 23, 322–347 (2014).
Martinez-Jaramillo, S., Alexandrova-Kabadjova, B., Bravo-Benitez, B. & Solórzano-Margain, J. P. An empirical study of the Mexican banking system’s network and its implications for systemic risk. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 40, 242–265 (2014).
Van Lelyveld, I. et al. Finding the core: Network structure in interbank markets. J. Bank. Finance 49, 27–40 (2014).
Gabrieli, S. & Georg, C.-P. A network view on interbank market freezes. Social Science Research Network https://ssrn.com/abstract=2797027 (2014).
Fricke, D. & Lux, T. Core–periphery structure in the overnight money market: Evidence from the e-MID trading platform. Comput. Econ. 45, 359–395 (2015).
Silva, T. C., Guerra, S. M., Tabak, B. M. & de Castro Miranda, R. C. Financial networks, bank efficiency and risk-taking. J. Financial Stab. 25, 247–257 (2016).
Kojaku, S., Cimini, G., Caldarelli, G. & Masuda, N. Structural changes in the interbank market across the financial crisis from multiple core–periphery analysis. J. Netw. Theory Finance 4, 33–51 (2018).
In’t Veld, D., van der Leij, M. & Hommes, C. The formation of a core-periphery structure in heterogeneous financial networks. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 119, 103972 (2020).
Barucca, P. & Lillo, F. Disentangling bipartite and core-periphery structure in financial networks. Chaos Solitons Fract. 88, 244–253 (2016).
Cont, R. & Kokholm, T. Central clearing of OTC derivatives: bilateral vs multilateral netting. Stat. Risk Model. 31, 3–22 (2014).
Cont, R. & Minca, A. Credit default swaps and systemic risk. Ann. Oper. Res. 247, 523–547 (2016).
Duffie, D., Scheicher, M. & Vuillemey, G. Central clearing and collateral demand. J. Financial Econ. 116, 237–256 (2015).
Heath, A., Kelly, G., Manning, M., Markose, S. & Shaghaghi, A. R. CCPs and network stability in OTC derivatives markets. J. Financial Stab. 27, 217–233 (2016).
Markose, S., Giansante, S. & Shaghaghi, A. R. A systemic risk assessment of otc derivatives reforms and skin-in-the-game for CCPs. Bank of France https://publications.banque-france.fr/sites/default/files/medias/documents/fsr21_web.pdf#page=111 (2017).
Duffie, D. & Zhu, H. Does a central clearing counterparty reduce counterparty risk? Rev. Asset Pricing Stud. 1, 74–95 (2011).
Poce, G. et al. What do central counterparties default funds really cover? A network-based stress test answer. J. Netw. Theory Finance 4, 43–57 (2018).
Huang, X., Vodenska, I., Wang, F., Havlin, S. & Stanley, H. E. Identifying influential directors in the United States corporate governance network. Phys. Rev. E 84, 046101 (2011).
Huang, X., Vodenska, I., Havlin, S. & Stanley, H. E. Cascading failures in bi-partite graphs: model for systemic risk propagation. Sci. Rep. 3, 1219 (2013).
Mantegna, R. N. Hierarchical structure in financial markets. Eur. Phys. J. B 11, 193–197 (1999). This paper builds a hierarchical tree of stocks starting from the correlations of their returns.
Tumminello, M., Aste, T., Di Matteo, T. & Mantegna, R. N. A tool for filtering information in complex systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 10421–10426 (2005).
Kremer, M., Becker, A. P., Vodenska, I., Stanley, H. E. & Schäfer, R. Economic and political effects on currency clustering dynamics. Quant. Finance 19, 705–716 (2019).
Billio, M., Getmansky, M., Lo, A. & L., P. Econometric measures of connectedness and systemic risk in the finance and insurance sectors. J. Financ. Econ. 104, 535–559 (2012).
MacMahon, M. & Garlaschelli, D. Community detection for correlation matrices. Phys. Rev. X 5, 021006 (2015).
Almog, A., Besamusca, F., MacMahon, M. & Garlaschelli, D. Mesoscopic community structure of financial markets revealed by price and sign fluctuations. PLoS ONE 10, e0133679 (2015).
Anagnostou, I., Squartini, T., Kandhai, D. & Garlaschelli, D. Uncovering the mesoscale structure of the credit default swap market to improve portfolio risk modelling. Quant. Finance 10.1080/14697688.2021.1890807 (2021).
Verma, A., Buonocore, R. J. & Di Matteo, T. A cluster driven log-volatility factor model: a deepening on the source of the volatility clustering. Quant. Finance 19, 981–996 (2019).
Bonanno, G., Caldarelli, G., Lillo, F. & Mantegna, R. N. Topology of correlation-based minimal spanning trees in real and model markets. Phys. Rev. E 68, 046130 (2003).
Bartesaghi, P., Benzi, M., Clemente, G. P., Grassi, R. & Estrada, E. Risk-dependent centrality in economic and financial networks. SIAM J. Financ. Math. 11, 526–565 (2020).
Laloux, L., Cizeau, P., Bouchaud, J.-P. & Potters, M. Noise dressing of financial correlation matrices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1467 (1999).
Plerou, V. et al. Random matrix approach to cross correlations in financial data. Phys. Rev. E 65, 066126 (2002).
Lillo, F. & Mantegna, R. Spectral density of the correlation matrix of factor models: A random matrix theory approach. Phys. Rev. E 72, 016219 (2005).
Barucca, P., Kieburg, M. & Ossipov, A. Eigenvalue and eigenvector statistics in time series analysis. Europhys. Lett. 129, 60003 (2020).
Mehta, M. L. Random Matrices (Elsevier, 2004).
Livan, G., Novaes, M. & Vivo, P. Introduction to Random Matrices: Theory and Practice Vol. 26 (Springer, 2018).
Ahelegbey, D., Billio, M. & R., C. Bayesian graphical models for structural vector autoregressive processes. J. Appl. Econ. 31, 357–386 (2016).
Ahelegbey, D., Billio, M. & R., C. Sparse graphical vector autoregression: a Bayesian approach. Ann. Econ. Stat. 123/124, 333–361 (2016).
Bianconi, G. Multilayer Networks: Structure and Function (Oxford Univ. Press, 2018).
Battiston, S., Caldarelli, G. & Garas, A. Multiplex and Multilevel Networks (Oxford Univ. Press, 2018).
Langfield, S., Liu, Z. & Ota, T. Mapping the UK interbank system. J. Bank. Finance 45, 288–303 (2014).
Molina-Borboa, J. L., Martínez-Jaramillo, S., López-Gallo, F. & van der Leij, M. A multiplex network analysis of the Mexican banking system: link persistence, overlap and waiting times. J. Netw. Theory Finance 1, 99–138 (2015).
Bargigli, L., di Iasio, G., Infante, L. & Pierobon, F. The multiplex structure of interbank networks. Quant. Finance 15, 673–691 (2015).
Vodenska, I. et al. Community analysis of global financial markets. Risks 4, 13 (2016).
Vodenska, I., Aoyama, H., Fujiwara, Y., Iyetomi, H. & Arai, Y. Interdependencies and causalities in coupled financial networks. PLoS ONE 11, e0150994 (2016).
Curme, C., Stanley, H. E. & Vodenska, I. Coupled network approach to predictability of financial market returns and news sentiments. Int. J. Theor. Appl. Finance 18, 1550043 (2015).
Berndsen, R. J., León, C. & Renneboog, L. Financial stability in networks of financial institutions and market infrastructures. J. Financ. Stab. 35, 120–135 (2016).
Bardoscia, M., Bianconi, G. & Ferrara, G. Multiplex network analysis of the UK over-the-counter derivatives market. Int. J. Finance Econ. 24, 1520–1544 (2019).
de Jeude, Jv. L., Aste, T. & Caldarelli, G. The multilayer structure of corporate networks. New J. Phys. 21, 025002 (2019).
Heise, S. & Kühn, R. Derivatives and credit contagion in interconnected networks. Eur. Phys. J. B 85, 115 (2012).
Brunnermeier, M. K. et al. Assessing contagion risks in the CDS market. Occasional Paper Series, no. 4. European Systemic Risk Board https://www.esrb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/occasional/20130917_occasional_paper_4.pdf (2013).
Roukny, T., George, C.-P. & Battiston, S. A network analysis of the evolution of the German interbank market. Social Science Research Network https://ssrn.com/abstract=2796998 (2014).
D’Errico, M., Battiston, S., Peltonen, T. & Scheicher, M. How does risk flow in the credit default swap market? J. Financ. Stab. 35, 53–74 (2018).
Schuldenzucker, S., Seuken, S. & Battiston, S. Default ambiguity: Credit default swaps create new systemic risks in financial networks. Manage. Sci. 66, 1783–2290 (2019).
Papp, P. A. & Wattenhofer, R. Default ambiguity: finding the best solution to the clearing problem. Preprint at arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.07741 (2020).
Papp, P. A. & Wattenhofer, R. Sequential defaulting in financial networks. Preprint at arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.10485 (2020).
Eisenberg, L. & Noe, T. H. Systemic risk in financial systems. Manage. Sci. 47, 236–249 (2001). This paper introduces the foundational framework for clearing of interbank obligations and derives key results on the existence of solutions.
Rogers, L. C. & Veraart, L. A. Failure and rescue in an interbank network. Manage. Sci. 59, 882–898 (2013).
Banerjee, T. & Feinstein, Z. Impact of contingent payments on systemic risk in financial networks. Math. Financ. Econ. 13, 617–636 (2019).
Bardoscia, M., Ferrara, G., Vause, N. & Yoganayagam, M. Full payment algorithm. Social Science Research Network https://ssrn.com/abstract=3344580 (2019).
Banerjee, T., Bernstein, A. & Feinstein, Z. Dynamic clearing and contagion in financial networks. Preprint at arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.02091 (2018).
Paddrik, M., Rajan, S. & Young, H. P. Contagion in derivatives markets. Manage. Sci. 66, 3295–3798 (2020).
Bardoscia, M., Ferrara, G., Vause, N. & Yoganayagam, M. Simulating liquidity stress in the derivatives market. Social Science Research Network https://ssrn.com/abstract=3508655 (2019).
Cont, R., Moussa, A. & Santos, E. B. in Handbook on Systemic Risk (eds Fouque, J.-P. & Langsam, J. A.) chap. 13, 327–336 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Furfine, C. H. Interbank exposures: quantifying the risk of contagion. J. Money Credit Bank. 35, 111–129 (2003).
Gleeson, J. P., Hurd, T., Melnik, S. & Hackett, A. in Advances in Network Analysis and its Applications (ed. Kranakis, E.) 27–56 (Springer, 2012).
Amini, H., Cont, R. & Minca, A. Resilience to contagion in financial networks. Math. Finance 26, 329–356 (2016).
Bardoscia, M., Battiston, S., Caccioli, F. & Caldarelli, G. DebtRank: a microscopic foundation for shock propagation. PLoS ONE 10, e0130406 (2015).
Bardoscia, M., Caccioli, F., Perotti, J. I., Vivaldo, G. & Caldarelli, G. Distress propagation in complex networks: the case of non-linear DebtRank. PLoS ONE 11, e0163825 (2016).
Fink, K., Krüger, U., Meller, B. & Wong, L.-H. The credit quality channel: modeling contagion in the interbank market. J. Financ. Stab. 25, 83–97 (2016).
Elsinger, H., Lehar, A. & Summer, M. Risk assessment for banking systems. Manag. Sci. 52, 1301–1314 (2006).
Fischer, T. No-arbitrage pricing under systemic risk: accounting for cross-ownership. Math. Finance 24, 97–124 (2014).
Barucca, P. Network valuation in financial systems. Math. Finance 30, 1181–1204 (2020). This paper shows that different previously unrelated models of financial contagion can all be mapped to valuation models on a network.
Bardoscia, M., Barucca, P., Codd, A. B. & Hill, J. Forward-looking solvency contagion. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 108, 103755 (2019).
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Basel III: a global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems. Bank for International Settlements https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs189.pdf (2011).
Wells, S. Financial interlinkages in the United Kingdom’s interbank market and the risk of contagion. Bank of England http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/archive/Documents/historicpubs/workingpapers/2004/wp230.pdf (2004).
Mistrulli, P. E. Assessing financial contagion in the interbank market: Maximum entropy versus observed interbank lending patterns. J. Bank. Finance 35, 1114–1127 (2011).
Hüser, A.-C., Hałaj, G., Kok, C., Perales, C. & van der Kraaij, A. The systemic implications of bail-in: a multi-layered network approach. J. Financ. Stab. 38, 81–97 (2018).
Feinstein, Z. et al. Sensitivity of the Eisenberg–Noe clearing vector to individual interbank liabilities. SIAM J. Financ. Math. 9, 1286–1325 (2018).
Gai, P., Haldane, A. & Kapadia, S. Complexity, concentration and contagion. J. Monet. Econ. 58, 453–470 (2011).
Brandi, G., Clemente, R. D. & Cimini, G. Epidemics of liquidity shortages in interbank markets. Physica A 507, 255–267 (2018).
Cimini, G. & Serri, M. Entangling credit and funding shocks in interbank markets. PLoS ONE 11, e0161642 (2016).
Allen, F. & Gale, D. Financial contagion. J. Polit. Econ. 108, 1–33 (2000). This paper builds a model of financial contagion that shows that fully connected networks are more robust than sparser networks.
Freixas, X., Parigi, B. M. & Rochet, J.-C. Systemic risk, interbank relations, and liquidity provision by the central bank. J. Money Credit Bank. 32, 611–638 (2000).
Battiston, S., Gatti, D. D., Gallegati, M., Greenwald, B. & Stiglitz, J. E. Default cascades: when does risk diversification increase stability? J. Financ. Stab. 8, 138–149 (2012).
Battiston, S., Delli Gatti, D., Gallegati, M., Greenwald, B. & Stiglitz, J. E. Liaisons dangereuses: increasing connectivity, risk sharing, and systemic risk. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 36, 1121–1141 (2012).
Acemoglu, D., Ozdaglar, A. & Tahbaz-Salehi, A. Systemic risk and stability in financial networks. Am. Econ. Rev. 105, 564–608 (2015).
Gai, P. & Kapadia, S. Contagion in financial networks. Proc. R. Soc. A 466, 2401–2423 (2010). This is one of the first papers to show that financial networks may be robust yet fragile, meaning that contagion events are rare but extremely severe.
Nier, E., Yang, J., Yorulmazer, T. & Alentorn, A. Network models and financial stability. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 31, 2033–2060 (2007).
Kobayashi, T. Network versus portfolio structure in financial systems. Eur. Phys. J. B 86, 434 (2013).
Lenzu, S. & Tedeschi, G. Systemic risk on different interbank network topologies. Physica A 391, 4331–4341 (2012).
Roukny, T., Bersini, H., Pirotte, H., Caldarelli, G. & Battiston, S. Default cascades in complex networks: topology and systemic risk. Sci. Rep. 3, 2759 (2013).
Markose, S., Giansante, S. & Shaghaghi, A. R. ‘Too interconnected to fail’ financial network of US CDS market: Topological fragility and systemic risk. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 83, 627–646 (2012).
Glasserman, P. & Young, H. P. How likely is contagion in financial networks? J. Bank. Finance 50, 383–399 (2015).
Ramadiah, A. et al. Network sensitivity of systemic risk. J. Netw. Theory Finance 5, 53–72 (2020).
Batiz-Zuk, E., López-Gallo, F., Martínez-Jaramillo, S. & Solórzano-Margain, J. P. Calibrating limits for large interbank exposures from a system-wide perspective. J. Financ. Stab. 27, 198–216 (2016).
Capponi, A., Dooley, J. M., Oet, M. V. & Ong, S. J. Capital and resolution policies: the US interbank market. J. Financ. Stab. 30, 229–239 (2016).
Alter, A., Craig, B. & Raupach, P. Centrality-based capital allocations and bailout. Int. J. Cent. Bank. 11, 329–377 (2015).
Minca, A. & Sulem, A. Optimal control of interbank contagion under complete information. Stat. Risk Model. 31, 23–48 (2014).
Capponi, A. & Chen, P.-C. Systemic risk mitigation in financial networks. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 58, 152–166 (2015).
Jackson, M. O. & Pernoud, A. Credit freezes, equilibrium multiplicity, and optimal bailouts in financial networks. Social Science Research Network https://ssrn.com/abstract=3735251 (2021).
Majdandzic, A. et al. Multiple tipping points and optimal repairing in interacting networks. Nat. Commun. 7, 10850 (2016).
Delpini, D. et al. Evolution of controllability in interbank networks. Sci. Rep. 3, 1626 (2013).
Galbiati, M., Delpini, D. & Battiston, S. The power to control. Nat. Phys. 9, 126–128 (2013).
Poledna, S. & Thurner, S. Elimination of systemic risk in financial networks by means of a systemic risk transaction tax. Quant. Finance 16, 1599–1613 (2016).
Thurner, S. & Poledna, S. DebtRank-transparency: Controlling systemic risk in financial networks. Sci. Rep. 3, 1888 (2013).
Diem, C., Pichler, A. & Thurner, S. What is the minimal systemic risk in financial exposure networks?. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 116, 103900 (2020).
Caccioli, F., Shrestha, M., Moore, C. & Farmer, J. D. Stability analysis of financial contagion due to overlapping portfolios. J. Bank. Finance 46, 233–245 (2014). This paper introduces a network model of contagion due to fire sales and overlapping portfolios, and it shows how contagion through this channel can be modelled as a multitype Galton–Watson process.
Greenwood, R., Landier, A. & Thesmar, D. Vulnerable banks. J. Financ. Econ. 115, 471–485 (2015).
Corsi, F., Marmi, S. & Lillo, F. When micro prudence increases macro risk: the destabilizing effects of financial innovation, leverage, and diversification. Oper. Res. 64, 1073–1088 (2016).
Duarte, F. & Eisenbach, T. M. Fire-sale spillovers and systemic risk. Social Science Research Network https://ssrn.com/abstract=2340669 (2018).
Cont, R. & Schaanning, E. Fire sales, indirect contagion and systemic stress testing. Social Science Research Network https://ssrn.com/abstract=2541114 (2017).
Bouchaud, J.-P., Farmer, J. D. & Lillo, F. in Handbook of Financial Markets: Dynamics and Evolution (eds Hens, T. & Schenk-Hoppé, K. R.) 57–160 (Elsevier, 2009).
Watts, D. J. A simple model of global cascades on random networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 5766–5771 (2002).
Ramadiah, A., Fricke, D. & Caccioli, F. Backtesting macroprudential stress tests. Social Science Research Network https://ssrn.com/abstract=3674323 (2020).
Sakamoto, Y. & Vodenska, I. Systemic risk propagation in bank-asset network: new perspective on Japanese banking crisis in the 1990s. J. Complex Netw. 5, 315–333 (2016).
Sakamoto, Y. & Vodenska, I. Impact of bankruptcy through asset portfolios. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 225, 1311–1316 (2016).
Smolyak, A., Levy, O., Vodenska, I., Buldyrev, S. & Havlin, S. Mitigation of cascading failures in complex networks. Sci. Rep. 10, 16124 (2020).
Adrian, T. & Shin, H. S. Liquidity and leverage. J. Financ. Intermed. 19, 418–437 (2010).
Shin, H. S. Risk and Liquidity (Oxford Univ. Press, 2010).
Cont, R. & Schaanning, E. Monitoring indirect contagion. J. Bank. Finance 104, 85–102 (2019).
Guo, W., Minca, A. & Wang, L. The topology of overlapping portfolio networks. Stat. Risk Model. 33, 139–155 (2016).
Braverman, A. & Minca, A. Networks of common asset holdings: aggregation and measures of vulnerability. J. Netw. Theory Finance 4, 53–78 (2018).
Fricke, C. & Fricke, D. Vulnerable asset management? The case of mutual funds. Social Science Research Network https://ssrn.com/abstract=2866301 (2017).
Baranova, Y., Coen, J., Noss, J. & Lowe, P. Simulating stress across the financial system: the resilience of corporate bond markets and the role of investment funds. Social Science Research Network https://ssrn.com/abstract=3134656 (2017).
Fricke, D. & Wilke, H. Connected funds. Social Science Research Network https://ssrn.com/abstract=3684270 (2020).
Delpini, D., Battiston, S., Caldarelli, G. & Riccaboni, M. Systemic risk from investment similarities. PLoS ONE 14, e0217141 (2019).
Farmer, J. D., Kleinnijenhuis, A. M., Nahai-Williamson, P. & Wetzer, T. Foundations of system-wide financial stress testing with heterogeneous institutions. Social Science Research Network https://ssrn.com/abstract=3601846 (2020).
Caccioli, F., Ferrara, G. & Ramadiah, A. Modelling fire sale contagion across banks and non-banks. Social Science Research Network https://ssrn.com/abstract=3647204 (2020).
Kusnetsov, M. & Veraart, L. A. M. Interbank clearing in financial networks with multiple maturities. SIAM J. Financ. Math. 10, 37–67 (2019).
Feinstein, Z. Obligations with physical delivery in a multilayered financial network. SIAM J. Financ. Math. 10, 877–906 (2019).
Burkholz, R., Leduc, M. V., Garas, A. & Schweitzer, F. Systemic risk in multiplex networks with asymmetric coupling and threshold feedback. Physica D 323, 64–72 (2016).
Brummitt, C. D. & Kobayashi, T. Cascades in multiplex financial networks with debts of different seniority. Phys. Rev. E 91, 062813 (2015).
Poledna, S., Molina-Borboa, J. L., Martínez-Jaramillo, S., van der Leij, M. & Thurner, S. The multi-layer network nature of systemic risk and its implications for the costs of financial crises. J. Financ. Stab. 20, 70–81 (2015).
Montagna, M. & Kok, C. Multi-layered interbank model for assessing systemic risk. Working Paper Series, no. 1944. European Central Bank https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp1944.en.pdf (2016).
Bookstaber, R. & Kenett, D. Y. Looking deeper, seeing more: a multilayer map of the financial system. OFR Brief Series, no. 16-06. Office of Financial Research https://www.financialresearch.gov/briefs/files/OFRbr_2016-06_Multilayer-Map.pdf (2016).
Cifuentes, R., Ferrucci, G. & Shin, H. S. Liquidity risk and contagion. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 3, 556–566 (2005).
Caccioli, F., Farmer, J. D., Foti, N. & Rockmore, D. Overlapping portfolios, contagion, and financial stability. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 51, 50–63 (2015).
Poledna, S., Martínez-Jaramillo, S., Caccioli, F. & Thurner, S. Quantification of systemic risk from overlapping portfolios in the financial system. J. Financial Stab. 52, 100808 (2021).
Squartini, T. & Garlaschelli, D. Maximum-Entropy Networks. Pattern Detection, Network Reconstruction and Graph Combinatorics (Springer, 2017).
Squartini, T. & Garlaschelli, D. Stationarity, non-stationarity and early warning signals in economic networks. J. Complex Netw. 3, 1–21 (2015).
Mastrandrea, R., Squartini, T., Fagiolo, G. & Garlaschelli, D. Enhanced reconstruction of weighted networks from strengths and degrees. New J. Phys. 16, 043022 (2014).
Acemoglu, D., Ozdaglar, A. E. & Tahbaz-Salehi, A. Systemic risk in endogenous financial networks. Social Science Research Network https://ssrn.com/abstract=2553900 (2015).
Cabrales, A., Gottardi, P. & Vega-Redondo, F. Risk sharing and contagion in networks. Rev. Financ. Stud. 30, 3086–3127 (2017).
Farboodi, M. Intermediation and voluntary exposure to counterparty risk. Social Science Research Network https://ssrn.com/abstract=2535900 (2014).
Bargigli, L., Lionetto, A. & Viaggiu, S. A statistical test of Walrasian equilibrium by means of complex networks theory. J. Stat. Phys. 165, 351–370 (2016).
Squartini, T., Caldarelli, G., Cimini, G., Gabrielli, A. & Garlaschelli, D. Reconstruction methods for networks: the case of economic and financial systems. Phys. Rep. 208, 1–47 (2018).
Upper, C. & Worms, A. Estimating bilateral exposures in the German interbank market: Is there a danger of contagion? Eur. Econ. Rev. 48, 827–849 (2004).
Parisi, F., Squartini, T. & Garlaschelli, D. A faster horse on a safer trail: generalized inference for the efficient reconstruction of weighted networks. New J. Phys. 22, 053053 (2020).
Anand, K., Craig, B. & Von Peter, G. Filling in the blanks: Network structure and interbank contagion. Quant. Finance 15, 625–636 (2015).
Gandy, A. & Veraart, L. A. A Bayesian methodology for systemic risk assessment in financial networks. Manage. Sci. 63, 4428–4446 (2016).
Park, J., & Newman, M. E. J. Statistical mechanics of networks. Phys. Rev. E 70, 066117 (2004).
Squartini, T. & Garlaschelli, D. Analytical maximum-likelihood method to detect patterns in real networks. New J. Phys. 13, 083001 (2011).
Shannon, C. E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 623–656 (1948).
Jaynes, E. T. Information theory and statistical mechanics. Phys. Rev. 106, 620–630 (1957). Milestone paper showing that equilibrium statistical mechanics provides an unbiased prescription to make inferences from partial information.
Gabrielli, A., Mastrandrea, R., Caldarelli, G. & Cimini, G. Grand canonical ensemble of weighted networks. Phys. Rev. E 99, 030301 (2019).
Cimini, G., Squartini, T., Gabrielli, A. & Garlaschelli, D. Estimating topological properties of weights networks from limited information. Phys. Rev. E 92, 040802 (2015).
Caldarelli, G., Capocci, A., De Los Rios, P. & Muñoz, M. A. Scale-free networks from varying vertex intrinsic fitness. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 258702 (2002).
Anand, K. et al. The missing links: a global study on uncovering financial network structures from partial data. J. Financ. Stab. 35, 107–119 (2018). This paper performs an extensive comparison of reconstruction methods on various empirical financial networks.
Mazzarisi, P. & Lillo, F. in Econophysics and Sociophysics: Recent Progress and Future Directions (eds Abergel, F. et al.) 201–215 (Springer, 2017).
Ramadiah, A., Caccioli, F. & Fricke, D. Reconstructing and stress testing credit networks. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 111, 103817 (2020).
Lebacher, M., Cook, S., Klein, N. & Kauermann, G. In search of lost edges: a case study on reconstructing financial networks. Preprint at arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.01274 (2019).
Serrano, M. & Boguna, M. Topology of the world trade web. Phys. Rev. E 68, 015101 (2003).
Fagiolo, G., Reyes, J. & Schiavo, S. World-trade web: topological properties, dynamics, and evolution. Phys. Rev. E 79, 036115 (2009).
Barigozzi, M., Fagiolo, G. & Garlaschelli, D. Multinetwork of international trade: a commodity-specific analysis. Phys. Rev. E 81, 046104 (2010).
Fronczak, A. Structural Hamiltonian of the international trade network. Acta Phys. Pol. B 5, 31–46 (2012).
Fronczak, A. & Fronczak, P. Statistical mechanics of the international trade network. Phys. Rev. E 85, 056113 (2012).
Duenas, M. & Fagiolo, G. Modeling the international-trade network: a gravity approach. J. Econ. Interact. Coord. 8, 155–178 (2013).
Fagiolo, G., Squartini, T. & Garlaschelli, D. Null models of economic networks: the case of the world trade web. J. Econ. Interact. Coord. 8, 75–107 (2012).
Gualdi, S., Cimini, G., Primicerio, K., Di Clemente, R. & Challet, D. Statistically validated network of portfolio overlaps and systemic risk. Sci. Rep. 6, 39467 (2016).
Saracco, F., Di Clemente, R., Gabrielli, A. & Squartini, T. Randomizing bipartite networks: the case of the World Trade Web. Sci. Rep. 5, 10595 (2015).
Saracco, F. et al. Inferring monopartite projections of bipartite networks: an entropy-based approach. New J. Phys. 19, 053022 (2017).
Newman, M. E., Strogatz, S. H. & Watts, D. J. Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. Phys. Rev. E 64, 026118 (2001).
Bianconi, G. Entropy of network ensembles. Phys. Rev. E 79, 036114 (2009).
Coolen, A. C. C., De Martino, A. & Annibale, A. Constrained Markovian dynamics of random graphs. J. Stat. Phys. 136, 1035–1067 (2009).
Del Genio, C. I., Kim, H., Toroczkai, Z. & Bassler, K. E. Efficient and exact sampling of simple graphs with given arbitrary degree sequence. PLoS ONE 5, e10012 (2010).
Artzy-Randrup, Y. & Stone, L. Generating uniformly distributed random networks. Phys. Rev. E 72, 056708 (2005).
Blitzstein, J. & Diaconis, P. A sequential importance sampling algorithm for generating random graphs with prescribed degrees. Internet Math. 6, 489–522 (2011).
Tumminello, M., Micciché, S., Lillo, F., Piilo, J. & Mantegna, R. N. Statistically validated networks in bipartite complex systems. PLoS ONE 6, e17994 (2011).
Strona, G., Nappo, D., Boccacci, F., Fattorini, S. & San-Miguel-Ayanz, J. A fast and unbiased procedure to randomize ecological binary matrices with fixed row and column totals. Nat. Commun. 5, 4114 (2014).
Carstens, C. J. Proof of uniform sampling of binary matrices with fixed row sums and column sums for the fast curveball algorithm. Phys. Rev. E 91, 042812 (2015).
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Macroeconomic impact assessment of OTC derivatives regulatory reforms. Bank for International Settlements https://www.bis.org/publ/othp20.pdf (2013).
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Making supervisory stress tests more macroprudential: Considering liquidity and solvency interactions and systemic risk. Bank for International Settlements https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/wp29.pdf (2015).
Alves, I. et al. Network analysis of the EU insurance sector. Occasional Paper, no. 7. European Systemic Risk Board https://www.esrb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/occasional/20150713_occasional_paper_7.pdf (2015).
Bank of England. Stress testing the UK banking system: 2016 results. Bank of England https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/stress-testing/2016/stress-testing-the-uk-banking-system-2016-results.pdf (2016).
Bank of England. Stress testing the UK banking system: 2017 results. Bank of England https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/stress-testing/2017/stress-testing-the-uk-banking-system-2017-results.pdf (2017).
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Global systemically important banks: updated assessment methodology and the higher loss absorbency requirement. Bank for International Settlements https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs255.pdf (2013).
Anand, K., Gai, P. & Marsili, M. Rollover risk, network structure and systemic financial crises. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 36, 1088–1100 (2012).
Mazzarisi, P., Barucca, P., Lillo, F. & Tantari, D. A dynamic network model with persistent links and node-specific latent variables, with an application to the interbank market. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 281, 50–65 (2020).
Hatzopoulos, V., Iori, G., Mantegna, R. N., Miccichè, S. & Tumminello, M. Quantifying preferential trading in the e-MID interbank market. Quant. Finance 15, 693–710 (2015).
Silva, T. C., da Silva, M. A. & Tabak, B. M. Systemic risk in financial systems: a feedback approach. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 144, 97–120 (2017).
Silva, T. C., da Silva Alexandre, M. & Tabak, B. M. Bank lending and systemic risk: a financial-real sector network approach with feedback. J. Financial Stab. 38, 98–118 (2018).
Cortes, G. S., Silva, T. C. & Van Doornik, B. F. N. Credit shock propagation in firm networks: evidence from government bank credit expansions. Working Papers, no. 507. Banco Central do Brasil https://www.bcb.gov.br/pec/wps/ingl/wps507.pdf (2019).
Battiston, S., Mandel, A., Monasterolo, I., Schütze, F. & Visentin, G. A climate stress-test of the financial system. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 283–288 (2017).
Upper, C. Simulation methods to assess the danger of contagion in interbank markets. J. Financ. Stab. 7, 111–125 (2011).
Bacharach, M. Estimating nonnegative matrices from marginal data. Int. Econ. Rev. 6, 294–310 (1965).
Baral, P. & Fique, J. P. Estimation of bilateral exposures – A copula approach. CIRANO http://www.cirano.qc.ca/conferences/public/pdf/networks2012/02-BARAL-FIQUE-Estimation_of_Bilateral_Exposures-A_Copula_Approach.pdf (2012).
Di Gangi, D., Lillo, F. & Pirino, D. Assessing systemic risk due to fire sales spillover through maximum entropy network reconstruction. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 94, 117–141 (2018).
Drehmann, M. & Tarashev, N. Measuring the systemic importance of interconnected banks. J. Financ. Intermed. 22, 586–607 (2013).
Mastromatteo, I., Zarinelli, E. & Marsili, M. Reconstruction of financial networks for robust estimation of systemic risk. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2012, P03011 (2012).
Moussa, A. Contagion and systemic risk in financial networks. Ph.D. thesis, Columbia Univ. (2011).
Montagna, M. & Lux, T. Contagion risk in the interbank market: A probabilistic approach to cope with incomplete structural information. Quant. Finance 17, 101–120 (2017).
Hałaj, G. & Kok, C. Assessing interbank contagion using simulated networks. Comput. Manag. Sci. 10, 157–186 (2013).
Fronczak, A. in Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining (eds Alhajj, R. & Rokne, J.) (Springer, 2014).
G.C. acknowledges support from the EU project HumanE-AI-Net, no. 952026. D.G. acknowledges support from the Dutch Econophysics Foundation (Stichting Econophysics, Leiden, the Netherlands) and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO/OCW). F.S. and T.S. acknowledge support from the EU project SoBigData++, no. 871042.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Any views expressed are solely those of the author(s) and so cannot be taken to represent those of the Bank of England or to state Bank of England policy.
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Physics thanks Ladislav Krištoufek, Helmut Elsinger and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
- Bipartite networks
Networks in which nodes are of two different types, say A and B (for instance, companies and directors), and links exist only between nodes of different type (for instance, a director being connected to a company if they sit on the board of that company).
- Multiplex networks
Collections of networks (also called layers) with the same set of nodes, but with different links. In this context, multiplex networks are used to represent different kinds of linkages between financial institutions.
Items on the balance sheet of an institution that have a positive economic value because they generate present or future income.
A network structure characterized by a large clustering coefficient and a small average shortest path length.
- Community structure
A network characterization in which nodes can be grouped into sets such that each set of nodes is densely connected internally.
On a network, a sequence of consecutive edges connecting a sequence of distinct nodes. The shortest path between two nodes is the path of minimal length connecting them.
The tendency of nodes to be linked to other nodes with dissimilar degrees. Conversely, assortativity is the tendency for nodes to be linked to other nodes with similar degrees.
- One-mode projections
A one-mode projection of a bipartite network contains only nodes of one type (say A) and any two such nodes are connected to each other with an intensity proportional to the number of their common neighbours of the other type in the original bipartite network (for instance, two directors are connected by a link indicating the number of common boards on which they sit).
- Filtered matrix
Matrix, for instance representing correlations, that has been statistically validated (or otherwise processed to eliminate the effects of noise) so that, ideally, only statistically significant information is retained.
Refers to the case in which the liquid assets (such as cash) of one institution are larger than its short-term liabilities (such as loans to be paid back overnight).
Items on the balance sheet of an institution that have a negative economic value because they represent debt to be repaid, potentially at different times (or maturities) in the future.
In accounting, equity is defined by the balance sheet identity as the difference between assets and liabilities. Therefore, it represents the net worth of the institution.
Solvency refers to the case in which the assets of one institution are larger than its liabilities and, therefore, its equity is positive.
(VaR). Risk measure defined as a (typically) large quantile of the probability distribution of losses. For example, when the quantile is 0.99 and the distribution of losses is over a time horizon of 1 year, it is interpreted as the loss that occurs once every 100 years.
- Expected shortfall
(ES). Risk measure defined as the mean loss exceeding a (typically) large quantile of the probability distribution of losses. It is always larger than the value-at-risk at the same quantile.
Quantities representing the structural properties either to be enforced in the network reconstruction process or to be discounted in the network validation process.
- Shannon entropy
Functional quantifying the amount of uncertainty associated with a probability distribution (see Box 2). Its maximum is attained for a uniform distribution.
The fraction of possible connections that are actually realized in a network.
About this article
Cite this article
Bardoscia, M., Barucca, P., Battiston, S. et al. The physics of financial networks. Nat Rev Phys 3, 490–507 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00322-5
This article is cited by
Nature Communications (2022)
Communications Physics (2022)
Scientific Reports (2022)
Scientific Reports (2022)
Scientific Reports (2022)