Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.


The expansion of the Universe is faster than expected


This article has been updated

The present rate of the expansion of our Universe, the Hubble constant, can be predicted from the cosmological model using measurements of the early Universe, or more directly measured from the late Universe. But as these measurements improved, a surprising disagreement between the two appeared. In 2019, a number of independent measurements of the late Universe using different methods and data provided consistent results, making the discrepancy with the early Universe predictions increasingly hard to ignore.

Key advances

  • The local or late Universe measurement of the Hubble constant improved from 10% uncertainty 20 years ago to less than 2% by 2019.

  • In 2019, multiple independent teams presented measurements with different methods and different calibrations to produce consistent results.

  • These late Universe estimations disagree at 4\(\sigma \) to 6\(\sigma \) with predictions made from the cosmic microwave background in conjunction with the standard cosmological model, a disagreement that is hard to explain or ignore.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Disagreement between the Hubble constant prediction from the cosmological model using measurements of the early Universe and the more direct measurements from the late Universe.

Change history

  • 10 January 2020

    The Competing interest statement is added as it was missing from the previous version.


  1. 1.

    Riess, A. G. et al. Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid standards provide a 1% foundation for the determination of the Hubble constant and stronger evidence for physics beyond ΛCDM. Astrophys. J. 876, 85 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Pietrzyn´ski, G. et al. A distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud that is precise to one per cent. Nature 567, 200–203 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Reid, M. J., Pesce, D. W. & Riess A. G. An improved distance to NGC 4258 and its implications for the Hubble constant. Astrophys. J. Lett. 886, L27 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Wong K. C. et al. H0LiCOW XIII. A 2.4% measurement of H0 from lensed quasars: 5.3σ tension between early and late-Universe probes. Preprint at: (2019).

  5. 5.

    Shajib, A. J. et al. STRIDES: A 3.9 per cent measurement of the Hubble constant from the strong lens system DES J0408-5354. Preprint at: (2019).

  6. 6.

    Freedman, W. L. et al. The Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program. VIII. An independent determination of the Hubble constant based on the tip of the red giant branch. Astrophys. J. 882, 34 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Yuan, W. et al. Consistent calibration of the tip of the red giant branch in the Large Magellanic Cloud on the Hubble Space Telescope photometric system and a re-determination of the Hubble constant. https://10.3847/1538-4357/ab4bc9 (2019).

  8. 8.

    Huang, C. D. et al. Hubble Space Telescope observations of Mira variables in the type Ia supernova host NGC 1559: an alternative candle to measure the Hubble constant. Astrophys. J. in the press.

  9. 9.

    Verde, L., Treu, T. & Riess, A. G. Tensions between the early and the late Universe. Nat. Astron. 3, 891–895 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Knox, L & Millea, M. The Hubble hunter’s guide. Preprint at: (2019).

  11. 11.

    Wu, H. Y. & Huterer, D. Sample variance in the local measurements of the Hubble constant. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 471, 4946–4955 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kenworthy, W. D., Scolnic, D. & Riess, A. G. The local perspective on the Hubble tension: local structure does not impact measurement of the Hubble constant. https://10.3847/1538-4357/ab0ebf (2019).

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam G. Riess.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Riess, A.G. The expansion of the Universe is faster than expected. Nat Rev Phys 2, 10–12 (2020).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing