# Analogue of electromagnetically induced absorption in the microwave domain using stimulated Brillouin scattering

## Abstract

Electromagnetically induced transparency/absorption (EIT/EIA) tailor the amplitude and phase response of an absorption resonance to create large dispersion, which has been exploited for applications in slow- and fast-light, and quantum information science. Since EIA enhances (induces) absorption of an already existing absorption (transmission) profile, it leads to a significant reduction in output signal power. Induction of a narrow absorption feature within a gain resonance can compensate for the signal loss while creating large dispersion at the EIA feature frequency. However, the demonstration of an analogue of EIA exploiting gain resonances has remained elusive. Here, we exploit coherent interaction between the Brillouin gain resonances in orthogonal polarization states to demonstrate controlled excitation of an analogue of EIA over microwave frequency range of 2.5–43 GHz. We induce a narrow absorption feature (~6 MHz), with controllable depth and frequency, within Brillouin gain resonance, demonstrating a novel technique for microwave photonic processing.

## Introduction

The phenomenon of electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT), where a transmission window is induced in an otherwise absorption resonance, arises from the destructive quantum interference of different excitation pathways1. The reduced absorption is accompanied by a large dispersion at the transmission frequency. Recently, electromagnetically induced absorption (EIA)2, which is the counter phenomenon of invoking constructive interference between multiple interaction pathways to enhance/induce absorption, has been proposed and observed in atomic systems3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10, structural resonators11,12, plasmonic13,14, metamaterial15,16, and opto-electro-mechanical systems12,17,18,19. Similar to EIT, modification of the amplitude spectral response in EIA accompanies dispersion tuning20. EIT and its analog have been demonstrated in a variety of platforms such as atomic1, plasmonic21, opto-mechanical systems18,22, metamaterials23, and photonic-chip24 at optical, terahertz, and microwave frequencies. Demonstrations of EIT in these platforms have enabled applications such as slow light25,26, non-reciprocal light storage and control27,28, and microwave photonic delay and switching29,30,31.

However, in the case of EIA, limited applicability results from the fact that the enhanced/induced absorption reduces the signal power below the signal level in the absence of EIA, which further reduces the measurable signal power. Recently, an analog of EIA was exploited in a plasmonic structure at a low temperature of 20 K for demonstrating Faraday rotation32. Even for the EIT, it is practically difficult to make the induced transmission equal to the signal loss induced by the absorption resonance. Therefore, the output signal power in EIT is typically lower than the input signal and complete transparency is difficult to achieve25. It is, therefore, important to realize controlled excitation of narrow EIA features within a gain resonance such that the loss, which occurs in the conventional EIA and EIT process, is offset by the gain while still providing access to a large dispersion. If the absorption induced within the gain resonance is less than or equal to the amplification factor then we achieve large dispersion centered at the EIA feature frequency, which can be used for slow- and fast-light and phase shifting. However, if the depth of the EIA feature within the gain resonance is much larger than the amplification factor, then we can use EIA for realizing narrow bandwidth band-reject filters.

Real-world applications will further benefit from the excitation of gain enhanced EIA-like features in a platform that enables integration with existing photonic systems and allows optical and electrical control of the absorption feature depth and frequency over a wide frequency range. However, realization of an analog of EIA, which satisfy all the above-mentioned criteria, viz (i) EIA within a gain resonance, (ii) wideband operation within a given frequency regime, e.g. optical, terahertz, microwave (iii) access to dynamic control of EIA-like feature depth and frequency, and (iv) excitation in a waveguide platform that provides ease of integration with the existing photonic systems, is challenging.

Here we present the demonstration of an analog of electromagnetically induced absorption in the microwave domain by creating a controlled reduction of transmission (20–40 dB) in a narrow spectral window (~6 MHz) within a homogeneously broadened (36 MHz) gain resonance. We exploit the nonlinear optical process of backward stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS) to realize the gain resonance in the microwave domain and create an analog of EIA within it.

## Results

### Concept of the analog of EIA in RF domain

Figure 1 shows the concept of an analog of electromagnetically induced absorption in the microwave domain using backward SBS. We generate the optical probe using the intensity modulation of an optical carrier (ωc) from a laser diode (LD) with an radio frequency (RF) signal of frequency ΩRF. The modulated signal consists of a carrier (ωc), and the upper and lower sidebands (USB, LSB) at frequencies ωc + ΩRF and ωc − ΩRF, respectively (see Fig. 1a). Optical filtering of one of the modulation sidebands, ωc − ΩRF in Fig. 1a, using a narrow band optical filter, creates a probe having optical frequencies ωc and ωc + ΩRF.

In a backward SBS medium, the Brillouin shift ΩB = 2πνB for a pump of wavelength λp (frequency ωp) is given as $${\nu }_{\mathrm{B}}=\frac{2n{V}_{\mathrm{a}}}{{\lambda }_{\mathrm{P}}}$$, where n is the refractive index of the optical mode at λp and Va is the acoustic speed. A pump of frequency ωp then creates gain and loss resonances at frequencies ωs = ωp − ΩB and ωas = ωp + ΩB, respectively. The frequencies ωs and ωas are called the Stokes and anti-Stokes frequencies, respectively. The Brillouin gain (absorption) resonance has an associated phase response, whose slope depends on the Brillouin pump power and thus on the Brillouin gain and loss. The pump power-dependent Brillouin phase response finds use in slow- and fast-light33,34,35 and control of the phase matching condition in four-wave mixing36.

For an arbitrary pump polarization, the pump powers along the orthogonally polarized components (x and y) depend on the input polarization state of the pump. The x- and y-polarized pump components have the Brillouin shifts of ΩBx and ΩBy depending on the refractive indices nx and ny, respectively, along the two polarization axes. In our experiments, we tune the frequency ΩRF such that the modulation sideband of the probe (Fig. 1b) experiences Brillouin gain on counterpropagation to the pump (ωp). For an arbitrarily polarized probe, the x- and y-components of the modulation sideband interact with respective pump polarization components37,38,39 to create Lorentzian gain profiles at the Stokes frequencies ωsx = ωc + ΩRFx and ωsy = ωc + ΩRFy. Here ΩRFx and ΩRFy are the values of ΩRF for which ωp − ωsx = ωp −  (ωc + ΩRFx) = ΩBx and ωp − ωsy = ωp − (ωc + ΩRFy) = ΩBy. We use a single-mode fiber (SMF) as the Brillouin medium for which $$\frac{{\Omega }_{{\mathrm{{B}}}x}\, -\, {\Omega }_{{\mathrm{{B}}}y}}{2\pi } \sim$$ 100 kHz, where $$\frac{{\Omega }_{{\mathrm{{B}}}x}}{2\pi }$$ and $$\frac{{\Omega }_{{\mathrm{{B}}}y}}{2\pi }$$ are  ~11 GHz. The small difference in the Brillouin shifts for the two polarizations occur due to the small birefringence (Δn ~ 10−6) of the SMF. Due to the small difference between ΩBx and ΩBy, the Stokes frequencies ωsx and ωsy are nearly the same and gain resonances for the two orthogonal polarizations nearly overlap (see Fig. 1c). Since the phase slope for a Brillouin gain resonance depends on the pump power, Stokes polarization component with larger gain (solid red, Fig. 1c) has the large phase slope.

After counterpropagation to the pump in the SBS medium, the probe consists of x- and y-polarized carrier components Ecx and Ecy, respectively, and Brillouin gain processed Stokes components Esx and Esy, respectively. In the optical domain, the output intensity Ioptical = Esx +  Esy2 = Esx2 + Esy2 of the Brillouin gain resonance results from the two Lorentzian gain profiles centered at ωsx and ωsy (see Fig. 1c). The Brillouin gain, therefore, consists of the sum of two optical intensities, which do not carry any phase information and thus no interference occurs.

Photodetection of the probe, consisting of a carrier and SBS gain processed modulation sideband, followed by S21 measurement on a vector network analyser (VNA) results in the RF power $${S}_{\mathrm{{RF}}}({\Omega }_{\mathrm{{RF}}})=| {E}_{{\mathrm{c}}x}{E}_{{\mathrm{{s}}}x}+{E}_{{\mathrm{{c}}}y}{E}_{{\mathrm{{s}}}y}{| }^{2}=| {E}_{{\mathrm{{c}}}x}{E}_{{\mathrm{{s}}}x}{| }^{2}+| {E}_{{\mathrm{{c}}}y}{E}_{{\mathrm{{s}}}y}{| }^{2}+2{E}_{{\mathrm{{c}}}x}{E}_{{\mathrm{{s}}}x}{E}_{{\mathrm{{c}}}y}^{* }{E}_{{\mathrm{{s}}}y}^{* }$$ (see Supplementary Note 1). The phases and amplitudes of the Brillouin gain along the orthogonal polarizations gets transferred to the RF signals, which are generated by beating of the x- and y-polarized carrier with the x- and y-polarized gain processed modulation sidebands, respectively. The gain experienced by the probe polarization components along the x- and y-axis depends on the pump power along the respective axis38,39. Besides the SBS induced optical phase (ϕSBS), the intensity modulator introduces a bias voltage dependent phase shift (ϕmod, Fig. 1d)40,41, which is different for the orthogonally polarized probe components (Supplementary Fig. 1). The combined effect of ϕmod and ϕSBS is to shift the RF phases, corresponding to the x- and y-polarizations, along the phase (ϕ) axis (see Fig. 1d). By adjusting the pump polarization (Fig. 1b), we achieve larger gain for the Stokes polarization component with lower power and smaller gain for the Stokes polarization component of higher power such that the RF powers of the x- and y-polarized components are equalized at the EIA-like feature frequency (PRF, Fig. 1d). The combined effect of ϕmod and ϕSBS then results in RF phases (ϕ) of the x- (red solid) and y-polarized (green dashed) gain resonances to differ by  ~π at the frequency (see vertical line in ϕ, Fig. 1d) for which the RF amplitudes of the x- and y-polarized Brillouin gain are equal (PRF, Fig. 1d), which causes destructive interference. The destructive interference then introduces a large reduction in transmission within the Brillouin gain profile in the RF domain (see Fig. 1e). The coupling between the RF phases and amplitudes of two orthogonally polarized gain resonances, therefore, results in induced absorption. Coupling between the amplitude and phase response of different resonances has been exploited in a variety of photonic systems to demonstrate analogs of coherent interactions, e.g. Fano resonance, EIT3 over frequency regimes ranging from optical, THz to microwave.

Recently, an analog of EIT was demonstrated where the interference between two anti-Stokes Brillouin excitations was used to induce transparency in an absorption resonance27,28. In ref. 32, interference between a plasmon oscillation and a waveguide resonance was used to demonstrate an analog of EIA. In our demonstration, the transmission reduction within the gain profile occurs due to an interference between two orthogonally polarized gain resonances. It is therefore equivalent to an analog of EIA and is different from the spectral hole burning, which occurs in optical domain due to the pump depletion and gain saturation42,43,44.

The large reduction in transmission within the gain resonance introduces a sharp dispersion centered at the induced absorption frequency. Using the large dispersion slope, we obtain slow- and fast-light with an absolute resonant delay of more than a μs at the EIA-like feature frequency, which is much larger than the delay obtained using the conventional Brillouin gain for the same pump power. Recently, slow- and fast-light of microwave signals was achieved in superconducting nano electromechanical circuits exploiting EIT and using microwave control field29. We harness the optical and electrical control of the induced absorption feature through backward SBS and modulator bias, respectively, to achieve negative to positive delay tuning and photonic switching of microwave signals at room temperature, which has the potential for enabling microwave photonic signal processing applications. Since the SBS process acts as an optical filter that provides control over the amplitude and phase of the modulation sideband, our approach of creating an EIA analog should be realizable with any type of optical filter or gain resonance with complex transfer function.

### Controlled excitation of the EIA-like resonance

Figure 2a shows the experimental setup used for demonstrating the analog of EIA using backward SBS. We split a 1550 nm continuous-wave signal from a narrow linewidth (ΔνFWHM < 5 kHz) laser (Teraxion Inc.) into two arms using a fiber beam splitter. Here ΔνFWHM is the full-width at half-maximum bandwidth of the LD. In the probe arm, we use a z-cut intensity modulator (IM: Thorlabs) with a 3 dB bandwidth of 35 GHz to modulate the laser carrier (ωc). We use the RF signal (ΩRF) from a 43 GHz Vector Network Analyser (Keysight model: PNA N5224A) to drive the IM with RF signal powers in the range of 15–18 dBm. To control the bias voltage of the IM, we use a direct current power supply. The modulated signal is amplified using a low-noise erbium-doped fiber amplifier (Pritel) followed by filtering of one of the modulation sidebands using a fiber Bragg grating (FBG: AOS make) with a 3 dB bandwidth  <5 GHz. This results in an optical probe containing only a laser carrier and a single modulation sideband (Fig. 2a).

In the pump arm, we amplify the laser carrier (ωc) using a high-power erbium-doped fiber amplifier (Amonics: 2W) to control the pump power. For observing the induced absorption feature at the Brillouin shift (ΩB), we tune ΩRF around ΩB in the probe arm. The pump frequency ωp is, therefore, the same as the laser carrier frequency ωc. The pump and the probe are launched into a 500 m long SMF using circulators C1 and C2, respectively. In the SMF, the probe counterpropagates to the pump and the modulation sideband at ωc − ΩRF sees the Brillouin gain. The Brillouin gain experienced by the probe sideband is measured in the optical domain using an optical spectrum analyser (OSA-Anritsu). The RF gain resonance, which is generated due to the beating of the probe carrier ωc with the Stokes modulation sideband, is measured using a high-speed photodetector (Finisar) followed by the vector network analyser. The S21 measurement on the vector network analyser is used to obtain the RF amplitude, phase and delay response.

For demonstrating the analog of EIA at radio frequencies (ΩRF) other than ΩB, we modulate the laser carrier ωc in the pump arm using a phase modulator (Thorlabs). We use a 40 GHz signal generator (Agilent: E8257D) to modulate the laser in the pump arm. The modulation sideband of frequency of ωc + ΩRF + ΩB acts as the pump for the probe sideband of frequency ωc + ΩRF. We filter the carrier and other modulation sideband in the pump arm. In the pump and the probe arm, we use fiber polarization controllers (PCs) to control the polarization of the pump and the probe.

For a fixed pump power, when we align the pump and probe polarizations by adjusting their respective PCs, the maximum gain occurs. Figure 2b shows the normalized RF power Pnorm (dB) (black solid) and RF phase response (red dashed) at the Brillouin shift ΩB, which is  ~10.83 GHz for our SMF around 1550 nm, when the pump and probe polarizations are aligned and the IM bias voltage (Vb) is 1.36 V. A maximum gain of 40 dB appears when the pump and probe polarizations are aligned. The asymmetry in the Lorentzian profile in Fig. 2b occurs due to the gain seen by a higher order acoustic mode. As the pump and probe polarizations are misaligned while keeping the bias voltage fixed at 1.36 V, the gain drops to 25 dB (Fig. 2c). Tuning the bias voltage from 1.36 to 0.52 V then creates a large reduction (~37 dB) in transmission within the gain profile (Fig. 2d). This large dip in transmission occurs due to the destructive interference between the x- and y-polarized probe components as explained in Fig. 1. The tuning of the pump and probe polarizations splits the pump and probe power along the orthogonal polarizations in such a way that the probe polarization component with low (high) power sees the pump polarization component with higher (lower) power. Therefore, by adjusting the pump and probe polarizations we can equalize the RF signal amplitudes of the x- and y-polarized probes (see Fig. 1d). Tuning of Vb shifts the SBS phases (ϕSBS) seen by the x- and y-polarized probe components vertically along the phase axis (see Fig. 1d). Destructive interference occurs at the radio frequency for which the x- and y-polarized RF components have the same amplitude and a π phase shift exists between them. The induced absorption feature in Fig. 2d has a narrow 3 dB spectral width  ~6 MHz, which is six times smaller than the bandwidth of the conventional SBS gain profile in our SMF. The induced absorption feature introduces a sharp dispersion (see red dashed in Fig. 2d), which finds potential use in tunable RF delay applications29. Figure 2b–d shows that the tuning of the pump and probe polarizations in combination with Vb creates the condition for the destructive interference within the Brillouin gain profile.

Here, we show how the depth, frequency, and the number of induced absorption features within the gain resonance can be controlled. Figure 3a, b shows the experimental (solid black) and simulated (red dashed) plots, which are obtained from the model developed in the Supplementary Note 1, for the optical control of the EIA-like feature depth. Tuning the pump power from 215 mW (Fig. 3a) to 225 mW (Fig. 3b), at a fixed Vb, increases the depth of the induced absorption from 21 to 41 dB. To explain the origin of this large increase in the absorption due to a small change in the pump power, we plot the simulated RF amplitudes and phases for the orthogonal polarizations in the Supplementary Discussion. Supplementary Fig. 2 shows the simulated RF amplitude and phases of the orthogonal polarizations corresponding to the model fits in Fig. 3a, b. From our simulations, we note that with an increase in the pump power, the difference in the RF amplitudes of the orthogonally polarized components reduces from 0.4 to 0.05 dB (Supplementary Fig. 2b, e). However, the slight increase in the pump power still maintains the phase shift between the orthogonally polarized components at π. A higher pump power in Fig. 3b, therefore, equalized the RF amplitudes of the orthogonally polarized components better, thus optimizing the destructive interference to create larger absorption. Induced absorption of 21 dB in Fig. 3a is nearly the same as the gain, which shows that we can achieve transparency by making the induced absorption equal to the amplification provided by the gain resonance. Signal gain, loss and transparency are all measured with respect to the RF signal level for the pump-off case, which is the same as the level outside the gain bandwidth and is determined by the RF insertion loss of the photonic system.

To demonstrate tuning of the induced absorption feature frequency, we tune the bias voltage at a fixed pump power. Figure 3c, d shows the experimental and simulated plots for electrical control of the induced absorption feature frequency. Varying Vb from 4.186 (Fig. 3c) to 3.582 V (Fig. 3d) switches the induced absorption feature frequency from 10.819 to 10.828 GHz, which corresponds to a change of 9 MHz in the induced absorption frequency. The physics of the induced absorption feature frequency switching can be explained using the interference between the orthogonal polarization components (Supplementary Fig. 3) corresponding to the simulation results in Fig. 3c, d. Here the RF amplitudes of the two orthogonal polarizations are nearly equal at two different frequencies (Supplementary Fig. 3b, e). Tuning of the bias voltage causes the π phase shift condition to switch between these two frequencies, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 3c, f. Electrical control of the EIA-like feature frequency using a small change in the bias voltage has the potential for high-speed, high-resolution (sub 10 MHz) photonic switching of microwave signals29,45,46,47.

Finally, we explore the creation of induced absorption at multiple frequencies within the gain profile by controlling the polarizations of the pump and the probe, the pump power and Vb. Figure 3e, f shows the measured and simulated plots for the creation of induced absorption at one and two frequencies, respectively. Unlike electrical control where we switch the condition of destructive interference from one frequency to the other, we simultaneously create the condition for destructive interference at two frequencies in Fig. 3f. Once again, we explain these experimental results using the interference between the RF amplitudes and phases of the orthogonal polarizations (Supplementary Fig. 4) corresponding to the simulations in Fig. 3e, f. The 3 dB bandwidth of the dual frequency induced absorption in Fig. 3f is  ~11 MHz, which makes it a potential candidate for a high-resolution microwave photonic bandpass filter.

We have demonstrated the concept and control of the induced absorption depth, frequency, and number of absorption windows using a microwave frequency ΩRF equal to the Brillouin shift ΩB for our fiber. In order to demonstrate the analog of EIA at frequencies ΩRF other than ΩB, we modulate the optical field (ωc) in the pump arm, using an RF signal generator (Agilent:8257D), to obtain the Brillouin pump at ωc + ΩRF + ΩB while suppressing other frequencies in the pump arm. We demonstrate induced absorption features with a minimum depth of 35 dB from 2.5 to 43 GHz, a frequency variation with a factor of 17 (Fig. 4a–f). For demonstrating induced absorption in Fig. 4a–f, we optimize the system parameters such as the pump power, Vb, and the polarizations of the pump and the probe to maximize the absorption depth within the gain resonance. Induced absorption profiles in Fig. 4a–f accompany large dispersion, which is evident from the large slope of the phase spectrum (red dashed) in these figures. In order to obtain the phase profiles shown in Fig. 4a–f, we take the difference of the probe RF phase under the pump-on and pump-off condition. The sign of the phase in Fig. 4a is different from that shown in other figures, which enables tuning of the RF delay from positive to negative values. The wideband tunability of induced absorption feature complemented with large dispersion, and control over the induced absorption frequency and depth within the gain spectrum paves the way for RF photonic signal processing48 applications such as high-resolution two-channel RF switching, tunable RF delay and phase shifter, microwave photonic filters, and signal routing49.

### Excitation of induced absorption within EIT-like resonance

Most of the demonstrations of EIA and its analog have relied on enhancing the loss of an existing absorption resonance. Induction of an absorption feature within an EIT-like transparency window was recently proposed using a hybrid opto-electromechanical system18 and demonstrated at THz frequencies using a three-resonator metasurface system12, where a small absorption was induced in an EIT-like resonance. Using backward SBS, an EIT-like resonance can be created in the microwave domain exploiting a coherent interaction between the Brillouin Stokes and anti-Stokes resonance, under the condition that $$\frac{{P}_{\mathrm{{AS}}}}{{P}_{\mathrm{S}}}\gg 1$$ (ref. 50), where PAS and PS are the input powers of the probe modulation sidebands corresponding to the anti-Stokes and Stokes frequencies before SBS processing. Figure 5a shows an EIT-like resonance in the microwave domain centered at the Brillouin frequency ΩB. Creation of an EIT-like like resonance does not require interference between the orthogonal polarization components of the interacting pathways, as needed for induced absorption within a gain resonance. In order to create an EIT-like resonance in Fig. 5a, we use a FBG to make the ratio $$\frac{{P}_{\mathrm{{AS}}}}{{P}_{\mathrm{S}}}\gg 1$$ (ref. 50). We align the pump and probe polarizations to maximize the gain and loss seen by the Stokes and anti-Stokes sidebands, respectively. Since PASPS, Brillouin absorption creates an inverted Lorentzian that intersects with the Brillouin gain profile at two frequencies. If the phase difference between the intersecting gain and loss resonance at the intersection frequencies, where their amplitudes are the same, is equal to π, then destructive interference between them leads to creation of two rejection bands, one on each side of the transmission window. The resulting RF spectrum has the appearance of an EIT-like resonance30, as shown in Fig. 5a. The 3 dB bandwidth and depth of the rejection bands are 13 MHz and  ~38 dB, respectively. The 3 dB bandwidth of the transparency window and depth of the rejection sidebands are optically and electrically controllable.

In order to create induced absorption within the transparency window of EIT-like resonance, we adjust the polarization of the pump and probe while keeping the Vb fixed at a value of 5.958 V used in Fig. 5a. Tuning of the pump and probe polarizations reduces the depth of rejection sidebands (Fig. 5b) because different powers get coupled along each polarization axis and the condition of destructive interference is disturbed. When the intensity modulator bias voltage is tuned from 5.958 to 6.024 V, we observe a reduction of  ~35 dB in transmission over a narrow bandwidth of 6 MHz (Fig. 5b) within the transparency window. The induced absorption appears at the center of the transparency window, which primarily consist of the gain resonance50, when we adjust the pump and probe polarizations and vary the bias to create the condition for destructive interference of the gain resonances corresponding to orthogonal polarizations. This induced absorption feature within a transparency window is analogous to an exotic RF filter with three ultra-high rejection bands separated by 21 MHz. Similar to EIA-like features in Fig. 3a–c, induced absorption within an EIT-like resonance is flexible to optical and electrical control and accompanies large dispersion at the frequency of induced absorption. RF phase shifts of more than 360° are observed using induced absorption within an EIT-like resonance. The tuning of the phase slope sign corresponds to RF delay tuning from positive to negative delay.

The induced absorption within the EIT-like spectrum is tunable over a wide range of frequencies using a tunable pump configuration. Here, we demonstrate excitation of induced absorption within a transparency window over a frequency range of 2.5–43 GHz (Fig. 6). The controllability through optical and electrical means is also achievable at non-Brillouin frequencies. Tunability and control of an induced absorption feature within an EIT-like profile opens up high-resolution RF signal processing applications such as tunable RF delay, RF pulse shaping51, arbitrary waveform generation52, and notch filters17.

### RF delay using EIA-like resonance

It is evident from our results that an induced absorption feature within the homogeneously broadened Brillouin gain profile accompanies large dispersion. We use a vector network analyzer to measure the RF phase and group delay of the probe signals. In general, SBS provides a resonance group delay (Tgd) that depends on the Brillouin pump power (Pp) through the gain parameter $${G}_{\mathrm{b}}=\frac{{\mathrm{g}}_{b}{P}_{\mathrm{p}}{L}_{\mathrm{{eff}}}}{{A}_{\mathrm{{eff}}}}$$ as $${T}_{\mathrm{{gd}}}=\frac{{G}_{\mathrm{b}}}{{\Gamma }_{\mathrm{b}}}$$, where gb is the Brillouin gain coefficient, Leff is the effective length, Aeff is the effective mode area, and Γb is the Brillouin gain bandwidth. Large pump power and thus large gain imply more resonance delay. However, gain saturation53, pump depletion effects, and pulse distortion54,55, which occur at high pump powers, limit the maximum gain, which restricts the maximum delay to a few tens-of-nanoseconds. A number of Brillouin-based delay schemes have already been demonstrated27,33,34,35,56,57,58. In ref. 27, a delay of 110 μs was achieved by induction of a narrow transparency window (~17 kHz) in a microsphere resonance using forward SBS. We exploit backward SBS in a linear waveguide to induce a narrow absorption feature (~6–8 MHz) within a gain profile and achieve resonant RF group delay of up to a μs, which is nearly 30 times larger than the RF delay introduced due to a typical Brillouin gain resonance using the same pump power. Such large resonant delays enable wide delay tunability without introducing much pulse distortion as long as the pulse bandwidth is smaller than the delay medium bandwidth33,34,53. By controlling the polarizations of the pump and probe, modulator bias voltage, and the pump power, the delay can be tuned from negative to positive at a given microwave frequency.

Figure 7a shows the measured Lorentzian gain profile of Fig. 2b for the condition when both the pump and probe polarizations are aligned and the related RF delay is shown in Fig. 7b. Even with a large gain of 40 dB, the observed RF group delay at the Brillouin shift is only  ~40 ns. For the same pump power as in Fig. 7a, b, tuning the pump and probe polarization and intensity modulator bias voltage results in creation of a narrow band absorption (Fig. 7c) feature within the Brillouin gain profile. While the polarization adjustment reduces the gain to 25 dB in Fig. 7c, large dispersion at the induced absorption feature frequency introduces a large absolute delay of about 1 μs (Fig. 7d).

Using the tunable pump configuration, described earlier for wideband demonstration of induced absorption, we demonstrate RF delay and delay tuning from negative to positive value at non-Brillouin frequencies. Figure 8a, b shows the measured RF response and group delay, respectively, at a frequency of 17 GHz using induced absorption within an EIT-like resonance. By varying the bias and polarization conditions, we modify the RF amplitude and phase response of Fig. 8a to obtain the RF response in Fig. 8c. Figure 8d shows the RF delay response corresponding to the RF response shown in Fig. 8c. We, therefore, demonstrate the possibility of tuning the group delay from a negative (−800 ns) to positive (800 ns) value at a fixed frequency, as shown in Fig. 8b, d, by varying the bias and polarization conditions. The group delay tuning is verified by the change in the direction of the phase spectra slope (Fig. 8a, c). Such significantly large delay tunability over a wide frequency range is of importance in applications such as RF delay lines59 and buffers. The dispersion in this process can be tuned by adjusting the parameters such as input optical powers, applied voltage bias, and the power ratio between the polarization components to obtain large RF delay tunability in comparison with that obtained using just the SBS process. With the advent of on-chip SBS60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67, silicon intensity modulators68, and other chip-scale components, integrated circuits can be developed for realizing the analog of EIA for microwave photonic applications.

## Discussion

Most of the EIA demonstrations, reported so far, are based on enhancing the absorption of an existing absorption resonance. EIA through induction of absorption in a transmission profile was recently proposed18 and demonstrated at a fixed THz frequency12. In all these demonstrations, enhancement or induction of absorption reduces the signal power below the level before the EIA feature was created. In this work, we exploit coherent interaction between the orthogonal polarization components of a probe, which consists of a laser carrier and a single modulation sideband, to create narrow band absorption features within a homogeneously broadened Brillouin gain profile in the microwave domain. The amplification provided by the gain resonance offsets the signal loss due to induced absorption while still providing large dispersion. Since EIA can occur due to the enhancement of existing absorption or induction of absorption in a transmission or gain profile, we characterize EIA using the following two definitions:

$${\mathrm{{IF}}}=\frac{{T}_{\mathrm{{EIA}}}({\omega }_{\mathrm{o}})}{{T}^{\mathrm{{max}}}},$$
(1)
$${\mathrm{{EF}}}=\frac{{A}_{\mathrm{{EIA}}}({\omega }_{\mathrm{o}})}{A({\omega }_{\mathrm{o}})},$$
(2)

where IF is the induction factor, ωo is the resonance frequency of the EIA feature, TEIA(ωo) is the transmission at ωo when induced absorption occurs, Tmax is the maximum transmission of the transparency window or gain profile containing the induced absorption feature, EF is the absorption enhancement factor (EF), AEIA(ωo) is the absorption at ωo when induced absorption occurs, and A(ωo) is the absorption at ωo in the absence of absorption enhancement. The EF therefore refers to an increase in absorption in the presence of EIA compared to the absorption when EIA was absent and is consistent with the definition used to quantify EIA in literature2.

Table 1 shows a comparison of the absorption EF and IF achieved in different EIA systems. Each entry in the table is labeled using EF or IF to highlight the fact that if the EIA is due to enhancement of absorption or due to induction of absorption in a transparency or gain. For the entries in Table 1, we use the values given in literature or calculated19 them, wherever they were not given, from the data shown in the corresponding references using the definition for IF or EF. The EF in many of these systems is  <10. We use coherent Brillouin interactions to induce controlled reduction of transmission in the range of 20–40 dB (Fig. 3a, b) in a narrow spectral window (~6 MHz) within a Brillouin gain resonance. In our case, 40 dB of induced absorption correspond to an IF of 10,000.

Dynamic control of the induced absorption feature depth and frequency, using optical and electrical tuning of the amplitude and phase of the interfering gain resonances, has the potential to enable RF applications such as RF switching, tunable RF delay, and filtering. Narrow absorption features within an EIT-like resonance may find application in RF pulse shaping and simultaneous filtering of multiple signals. The SBS process in itself offers an edge to this technique where the central frequency of operation, bandwidth, and profile can be tuned using the input Brillouin pump parameters. The demonstration of controllable induced absorption in a fiber-optic platform using off-the-shelf components enables integration with existing fiber-based microwave photonic systems. Recent demonstrations of SBS in chalcogenide and silicon platforms along with on-chip silicon modulators, gratings, and lasers64,65 will enable integrated RF signal processing applications69,70 based on coherent Brillouin interactions. Since SBS provides optically tunable amplitude and phase response, this approach can be used with any gain medium with complex gain response.

## Data availability

All the experimental and simulated data are available in this paper. For more technical information, we provide the relevant data in the Supplementary Information. Further supporting information could be provided by the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

## References

1. 1.

Boller, K.-J., Imamoğlu, A. & Harris, S. E. Observation of electromagnetically induced transparency. Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2593–2596 (1991).

2. 2.

Lezama, A., Barreiro, S. & Akulshin, A. M. Electromagnetically induced absorption. Phys. Rev. A 59, 4732–4735 (1999).

3. 3.

Limonov, M. F., Rybin, M. V., Poddubny, A. N. & Kivshar, Y. S. Fano resonances in photonics. Nat. Photonics 11, 543–554 (2017).

4. 4.

Akulshin, A. M., Barreiro, S. & Lezama, A. Electromagnetically induced absorption and transparency due to resonant two-field excitation of quasidegenerate levels in Rb vapor. Phys. Rev. A 57, 2996–3002 (1998).

5. 5.

Goren, C., Wilson-Gordon, A. D., Rosenbluh, M. & Friedmann, H. Electromagnetically induced absorption due to transfer of coherence and to transfer of population. Phys. Rev. A 67, 033807 (2003).

6. 6.

Liang, S., Xu, Y. & Lin, Q. Simultaneous electromagnetically induced transparency and absorption in thermal atomic medium. Chin. Opt. Lett. 15, 090201 (2017).

7. 7.

Brazhnikov, D. V., Taichenachev, A. V., Tumaikin, A. M. & Yudin, V. I. Electromagnetically-induced-absorption resonance with high contrast and narrow width in the hanle configuration. Laser Phys. Lett. 11, 125702 (2014).

8. 8.

Islam, K. et al. Splitting of electromagnetically induced absorption signal in a five-level v-type atomic system. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 34, 2550–2557 (2017).

9. 9.

Taichenachev, A. V., Tumaikin, A. M. & Yudin, V. I. Electromagnetically induced absorption in a four-state system. Phys. Rev. A 61, 011802 (1999).

10. 10.

Kwon, M., Kim, K., Moon, H. S., Park, H. D. & Kim, J. B. Dependence of electromagnetically induced absorption on two combinations of orthogonal polarized beams. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 34, 2951–2961 (2001).

11. 11.

Liu, D. et al. Tunable multimode electromagnetically induced absorption transmission in metal-insulator-metal resonators. AIP Adv. 6, 025219 (2016).

12. 12.

Zhang, X. et al. Electromagnetically induced absorption in a three-resonator metasurface system. Sci. Rep. 5, 10737 (2015).

13. 13.

Taubert, R., Hentschel, M., Kästel, J. & Giessen, H. Classical analog of electromagnetically induced absorption in plasmonics. Nano Lett. 12, 1367–1371 (2012).

14. 14.

Zhong, N. et al. Analogue of electromagnetically induced absorption with double absorption windows in a plasmonic system. PLoS ONE 12, e0179609 (2017).

15. 15.

Na, B., Shi, J., Guan, C. & Wang, Z. From electromagnetically induced transparency to absorption in planar optical metamaterials. Chin. Opt. Lett. 11, 111602 (2013).

16. 16.

Tassin, P. et al. Electromagnetically induced transparency and absorption in metamaterials: The radiating two-oscillator model and its experimental confirmation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 187401 (2012).

17. 17.

Hocke, F. et al. Electromechanically induced absorption in a circuit nano-electromechanical system. N. J. Phys. 14, 123037 (2012).

18. 18.

Qu, K. & Agarwal, G. S. Phonon-mediated electromagnetically induced absorption in hybrid opto-electromechanical systems. Phys. Rev. A 87, 031802 (2013).

19. 19.

Naweed, A., Farca, G., Shopova, S. I. & Rosenberger, A. T. Induced transparency and absorption in coupled whispering-gallery microresonators. Phys. Rev. A 71, 043804 (2005).

20. 20.

Vafafard, A., Zaakeri, H., Zohravi, L. E. & Mahmoudi, M. Phase-controlled optical bistability via electromagnetically induced absorption. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 31, 1981–1985 (2014).

21. 21.

Zhang, S., Genov, D. A., Wang, Y., Liu, M. & Zhang, X. Plasmon-induced transparency in metamaterials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 047401 (2008).

22. 22.

Weis, S. et al. Optomechanically induced transparency. Science 330, 1520–1523 (2010).

23. 23.

Zhang, J., Xiao, S., Jeppesen, C., Kristensen, A. & Mortensen, N. A. Electromagnetically induced transparency in metamaterials at near-infrared frequency. Opt. Express 18, 17187–17192 (2010).

24. 24.

Zhu, Y., Hu, X., Yang, H. & Gong, Q. On-chip plasmon-induced transparency based on plasmonic coupled nanocavities. Sci. Rep. 4, 3752 (2014).

25. 25.

Hau, L. V., Harris, S. E., Dutton, Z. & Behroozi, C. H. Light speed reduction to 17 metres per second in an ultracold atomic gas. Nature 397, 594 (1999).

26. 26.

Safavi-Naeini, A. H. et al. Electromagnetically induced transparency and slow light with optomechanics. Nature 472, 69 (2011).

27. 27.

Kim, J., Kuzyk, M. C., Han, K., Wang, H. & Bahl, G. Non-reciprocal Brillouin scattering induced transparency. Nat. Phys. 11, 275 (2015).

28. 28.

Dong, C.-H. et al. Brillouin-scattering-induced transparency and non-reciprocal light storage. Nat. Commun. 6, 6193 (2015).

29. 29.

Zhou, X. et al. Slowing, advancing and switching of microwave signals using circuit nanoelectromechanics. Nat. Phys. 9, 179 (2013).

30. 30.

Choudhary, A. et al. High-resolution, on-chip rf photonic signal processor using Brillouin gain shaping and RF interference. Sci. Rep. 7, 5932 (2017).

31. 31.

D’Ambrosio, V., Carvacho, G., Agresti, I., Marrucci, L. & Sciarrino, F. Tunable two-photon quantum interference of structured light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 013601 (2019).

32. 32.

Floess, D. et al. Plasmonic analog of electromagnetically induced absorption leads to giant thin film faraday rotation of 14 degree. Phys. Rev. X 7, 021048 (2017).

33. 33.

Okawachi, Y. et al. Tunable all-optical delays via Brillouin slow light in an optical fiber. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 153902 (2005).

34. 34.

González-Herráez, M., Song, K.-Y. & Thévenaz, L. Optically controlled slow and fast light in optical fibers using stimulated Brillouin scattering. Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 081113 (2005).

35. 35.

Pant, R., Stenner, M. D., Neifeld, M. A. & Gauthier, D. J. Optimal pump profile designs for broadband sbs slow-light systems. Opt. Express 16, 2764–2777 (2008).

36. 36.

Mateo, E., Yaman, F. & Li, G. Control of four-wave mixing phase-matching condition using the Brillouin slow-light effect in fibers. Opt. Lett. 33, 488–490 (2008).

37. 37.

Thevenaz, L., Zadok, A., Eyal, A. & Tur, M. All-Optical Polarization Control through Brillouin Amplification. In 2008 Conference on Optical Fiber Communication/National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference, 1–3 (OFC conference IEEE, 2008).

38. 38.

Zadok, A., Zilka, E., Eyal, A., Thévenaz, L. & Tur, M. Vector analysis of stimulated Brillouin scattering amplification in standard single-mode fibers. Opt. Express 16, 21692–21707 (2008).

39. 39.

Shmilovitch, Z. et al. Dual-pump push-pull polarization control using stimulated Brillouin scattering. Opt. Express 19, 25873–25880 (2011).

40. 40.

Dennis, T. & Williams, P. A. Chirp characterization of external modulators with finite extinction ratio using linear optical sampling. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 22, 646–648 (2010).

41. 41.

Rogers, C. E.III, Carini, J. L., Pechkis, J. A. & Gould, P. L. Characterization and compensation of the residual chirp in a mach-zehnder-type electro-optical intensity modulator. Opt. Express 18, 1166–1176 (2010).

42. 42.

Takushima, Y. & Kikuchi, K. Spectral gain hole burning and modulation instability in a Brillouin fiber amplifier. Opt. Lett. 20, 34–36 (1995).

43. 43.

Kovalev, V. I. & Harrison, R. G. Observation of inhomogeneous spectral broadening of stimulated Brillouin scattering in an optical fiber. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1879–1882 (2000).

44. 44.

Juarez, A. A., Vilaseca, R., Zhu, Z. & Gauthier, D. J. Room-temperature spectral hole burning in an engineered inhomogeneously broadened resonance. Opt. Lett. 33, 2374–2376 (2008).

45. 45.

Han, S., Seok, T. J., Quack, N., Yoo, B.-W. & Wu, M. C. Large-scale silicon photonic switches with movable directional couplers. Optica 2, 370–375 (2015).

46. 46.

Jiang, H., Yan, L., Pan, W., Luo, B. & Zou, X. Ultra-high speed RF filtering switch based on stimulated Brillouin scattering. Opt. Lett. 43, 279–282 (2018).

47. 47.

Ge, J. & Fok, M. P. Ultra high-speed radio frequency switch based on photonics. Sci. Rep. 5, 17263 (2015).

48. 48.

Pant, R. et al. On-chip stimulated Brillouin scattering for microwave signal processing and generation. Laser Photonics Rev. 8, 653–666.

49. 49.

Brown, A. W. & Xiao, M. All-optical switching and routing based on an electromagnetically induced absorption grating. Opt. Lett. 30, 699–701 (2005).

50. 50.

Pant, A. S. S., Ravi & Yelikar, A. Wideband excitation of fano resonances and induced transparency by coherent interactions between Brillouin resonances. Sci. Rep. 8, 9175 (2018).

51. 51.

Buffa, R., Cavalieri, S. & Tognetti, M. V. Coherent control of temporal pulse shaping by electromagnetically induced transparency. Phys. Rev. A 69, 033815 (2004).

52. 52.

Khan, M. H. et al. Ultrabroad-bandwidth arbitrary radiofrequency waveform generation with a silicon photonic chip-based spectral shaper. Nat. Photonics 4, 117 (2010).

53. 53.

Zhu, Z. et al. Numerical study of all-optical slow-light delays via stimulated Brillouin scattering in an optical fiber. JOSA B 22, 2378–2384 (2005).

54. 54.

González-Herráez, M., Martin-Lopez, S. & Thévenaz, L. Analytical expression of pulse broadening in an arbitrary linear slow light medium. Opt. Lett. 37, 3171–3173 (2012).

55. 55.

Zhang, L., Soto, M. A. & Thévenaz, L. Minimizing distortion and enlarging group delay in Brillouin slow light systems by gain profile optimization. In Asia Communications and Photonics Conference 2014, (Shanghai, China, 2014) OSA Technical Digest (online) (Optical Society of America, 2014), paper ATh2C.4.

56. 56.

Chin, S. et al. Broadband true time delay for microwave signal processing, using slow light based on stimulated Brillouin scattering in optical fibers. Opt. Express 18, 22599–22613 (2010).

57. 57.

Merklein, M., Stiller, B. & Eggleton, B. J. Brillouin-based light storage and delay techniques. J. Opt. 20, 083003 (2018).

58. 58.

Preussler, S., Wiatrek, A., Jamshidi, K. & Schneider, T. Quasi-light-storage enhancement by reducing the Brillouin gain bandwidth. Appl. Opt. 50, 4252–4256 (2011).

59. 59.

Kim, M., Hacker, J. & DeNatale, J. A DC-to-40 GHz four-bit RF MEMS true-time delay network. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 11, 56–58 (2001).

60. 60.

Pant, R. et al. On-chip stimulated Brillouin scattering. Opt. Express 19, 8285–8290 (2011).

61. 61.

Lee, H. et al. Chemically etched ultrahigh-q wedge-resonator on a silicon chip. Nat. Photonics 6, 369 (2012).

62. 62.

Shin, H. et al. Tailorable stimulated Brillouin scattering in nanoscale silicon waveguides. Nat. Commun. 4, 1944 (2013).

63. 63.

Van Laer, R., Kuyken, B., Van Thourhout, D. & Baets, R. Interaction between light and highly confined hypersound in a silicon photonic nanowire. Nat. Photonics 9, 199 (2015).

64. 64.

Otterstrom, N. T., Behunin, R. O., Kittlaus, E. A., Wang, Z. & Rakich, P. T. A silicon Brillouin laser. Science 360, 1113–1116 (2018).

65. 65.

Gundavarapu, S. et al. Sub-Hertz fundamental linewidth photonic integrated Brillouin laser. Nat. Photonics 13, 60–67 (2019).

66. 66.

Eggleton, B. J., Poulton, C. G., Rakich, P. T., Steel, M. J. & Bahl, G. Brillouin integrated photonics. Nat. Photonics 1–14 (2019).

67. 67.

Wiederhecker, G. S., Dainese, P. & Mayer Alegre, T. P. Brillouin optomechanics in nanophotonic structures. APL Photonics 4, 071101 (2019).

68. 68.

Li, M., Wang, L., Li, X., Xiao, X. & Yu, S. Silicon intensity Mach Zehnder modulator for single lane 100Gb/s applications. Photon. Res. 6, 109–116 (2018).

69. 69.

Marpaung, D., Yao, J. & Capmany, J. Integrated microwave photonics. Nat. Photonics 13, 80 (2019).

70. 70.

Chen, L. R. Silicon photonics for microwave photonics applications. J. Lightwave Technol. 35, 824–835 (2017).

## Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the financial support of Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB) of the Department of Science and Technology (DST) through Ramanujan Fellowship (Fellowhship no: SB/S2/RJN-069/2014) and IISER-TVM start-up grant.

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

R.P. conceived and developed the idea. R.P. and S.S.A. designed the experiments. S.S.A. and A.B.Y. made experimental setup and conducted measurements. R.P. and S.S.A. analyzed the results and wrote the manuscript. R.P. supervised the project.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ravi Pant.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

A., S.S., Yelikar, A.B. & Pant, R. Analogue of electromagnetically induced absorption in the microwave domain using stimulated Brillouin scattering. Commun Phys 3, 109 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-020-0367-6