Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Quantum cascade laser based hybrid dual comb spectrometer


Four-wave-mixing-based quantum cascade laser frequency combs (QCL-FC) are a powerful photonic tool, driving a recent revolution in major molecular fingerprint regions, i.e. mid- and far-infrared domains. Their compact and frequency-agile design, together with their high optical power and spectral purity, promise to deliver an all-in-one source for the most challenging spectroscopic applications. Here, we demonstrate a metrological-grade hybrid dual comb spectrometer, combining the advantages of a THz QCL-FC with the accuracy and absolute frequency referencing provided by a free-standing, optically-rectified THz frequency comb. A proof-of-principle application to methanol molecular transitions is presented. The multi-heterodyne molecular spectra retrieved provide state-of-the-art results in line-center determination, achieving the same precision as currently available molecular databases. The devised setup provides a solid platform for a new generation of THz spectrometers, paving the way to more refined and sophisticated systems exploiting full phase control of QCL-FCs, or Doppler-free spectroscopic schemes.


High-precision molecular spectroscopy in the terahertz range of the electromagnetic spectrum (0.1–10 THz) has attracted, in the last decades, ubiquitous attention from the scientific community. Indeed, it promises to enable fundamental physics research (e.g., time variation of fundamental constants1,2, assessment of the electric dipole moment of the electron3, parity violation in molecules4) while simultaneously providing deep impact on real-life applications5, spanning from environmental monitoring6,7 to health science8,9, from communication10,11 to security12,13. Many scientifically intriguing molecules present characteristic rotational and ro-vibrational absorptions in the THz region. Therefore, this domain is nowadays considered as a fingerprint region still under development14. One of the big photonic challenges of the last decades has been the realization of THz laser sources capable of addressing absorption linestrengths comparable or even stronger than fundamental, mid-infrared (mid-IR), vibration transitions, but over much narrower Doppler-limited linewidths, ruled by inverse linear relationship with the wavelength15. In order to tackle metrological-grade spectroscopic applications, these lasers sources should ideally be broadband or widely tunable, spectrally pure, high-power, and traceable against a primary frequency standard16. To this purpose, THz sources based on cascaded frequency multiplication17,18 or difference frequency generation sources19,20 can be used, although they usually emit low (µW) power levels. Single-frequency THz quantum cascade lasers (QCLs) have recently shown metrological-grade performances21, at the cost of limited mode-hop-free tunability range (few hundred MHz). Instead, spectroscopic setups based on frequency combs (FCs) offer the possibility to overtake much of these disadvantages.

In the frequency domain, a FC consists of a series of coherent and equally spaced lines, with a fixed phase relation, covering a broad spectrum. The coherence of the optical modes allows all the modes of a FC to be fully controlled in phase by only two parameters: repetition and carrier offset frequencies22. Initially conceived for frequency metrology23,24,25, FCs have been straightforwardly applied to high-precision spectroscopy of samples, with a variety of different techniques26,27. The importance of using FCs for broadband spectroscopy relies on the exploitation of the frequency accuracy and spectral resolution provided by stabilized FC modes. However, this happens only if each comb mode is spectrally resolved, otherwise the comb acts only as a bright, broadband light source. For this reason, a number of high-resolution dispersive as well as Fourier transform spectrometers have been developed, capable of resolving individual comb modes27. Among these techniques, one of the most successful is multi-heterodyne spectroscopy, commonly known as dual comb spectroscopy (DCS)28,29, which allows retrieving Fourier spectra without the need of moving interferometric components. This translates in much faster and spectrally resolved acquisitions. In the most general picture, a DCS setup consists of two FCs with slightly different repetition frequencies, mixed onto a fast detector. This generates a down-converted radio-frequency comb, whose modes carry all the relevant information of the mixed FCs. In order to acquire molecular spectra, one or both FCs interact with a gaseous sample before frequency mixing. In this way, the sample spectral information is encoded into the FCs radiation, and therefore translated to the radio frequency (RF) domain, where it can be easily acquired and analyzed.

The possibility of migrating FC sources, and therefore DCS setups, in the THz region has been initially allowed by down-converted frequency combs (DC-FCs), obtained by down-conversion of visible or near-IR pulses in photoconductive antennas30 or non-linear crystals31. Since then, a number of different THz dual-comb spectrometers have been developed (see ref. 32 and references therein). The main drawback of these setups, however, is the µW level power provided by the small efficiency of the involved non-linear processes. Recently, a new approach to THz FCs has been proposed, which relies on QCLs33,34, representing one of the most significant developments for semiconductor physics of the last 25 years35.

QCLs are current-driven semiconductor lasers based on intersubband transitions, whose spectral emission can be engineered with a proper nanoscale tailoring of the quantum wells building up the laser heterostructure. With respect to non-linear down-converting setups, they emit much higher power coherent THz radiation, even though their widespread use is still hampered by the need of cryogenic cooling36,37. Moreover, the short upper lasing state lifetime, compared to the cavity round trip time, prevents classical passive mode-locking in QCLs38. Active pulsed mode-locking has been achieved in THz QCLs, with limitations on pulses duration that cannot match the inverse of the gain bandwidth, which, by itself, limits significantly pulse shortening at values as low as 4 ps39,40. Nevertheless, a different route to THz FCs based on QCL-FCs has been demonstrated, in the mid-IR41 and THz42 regions, based on multimode-emitting, broad-gain Fabry-Pérot devices, that can spontaneously achieve comb operation regime, over a specific range of biases, thanks to four-wave-mixing (FWM) non-linear effects43. Thorough characterization of these devices with shifted-wave interference Fourier-transform spectroscopy (SWIFTS)44,45,46 and Fourier-transform analysis of comb emission (FACE)47,48 techniques has proven that, thanks to FWM, a tight and non-trivial phase relation is established among the emitted modes, leading to an emission profile which is deeply frequency and amplitude modulated, rather than pulsed.

QCL-FCs can therefore be used in DCS setups, aiming to exploit their high (>10 mW) optical power. This has been demonstrated in the mid-infrared29 but, in this regard, the THz region is still lagging behind. In fact, an etalon signal (i.e., simulating a real molecular absorption) has been recorded in 201649, and, more recently, low resolution spectra of ammonia gas50 and water vapor have been acquired51,52. With respect to DC-FCs-based setups, one of the limiting factors is the lack of mutual coherence between the two QCL-FCs, which leads to much shorter integration times, and, more importantly from a metrological point of view, to the lack of suitable referencing to the primary frequency standard.

Here, we demonstrate a hybrid approach to THz DCS, capable of merging the two main advantages of DC-FCs and QCL-FCs based dual-comb spectrometers, i.e., the accurate and absolute referencing of the retrieved molecular absorption frequency on one side, and the high sensitivity ensured by the high emitted power on the other. We believe that the proof-of-principle demonstration of this novel approach can finally unleash the full potential of THz DCS setups. Our spectrometer has been characterized and tested on molecular absorption profiles of methanol vapors, returning a state-of-the-art absolute accuracy of about 5 × 10−8 on the measured transitions line center determination.


Experimental Setup

The THz hybrid dual-comb spectrometer setup is based on multi-heterodyne down-conversion of a THz QCL-FC and a fully stabilized optically rectified THz frequency comb (OR-FC), generated by means of a femtosecond telecom laser (Menlo Systems, FC1500) and a non-linear crystal waveguide31. A schematic illustration of the setup is presented in Fig. 1a. A full description of the employed high dynamic range QCL-FC can be found in ref. 53. It is mounted on the cold finger of a liquid helium flux cryostat, and is driven in continuous-wave (CW) operation by an ultra-low-noise current driver (ppqSense, QubeCL-P05). Its repetition frequency, corresponding to the inverse of the cavity round trip time, is about 17.45 GHz, and can be extracted as intermodal beatnote frequency (fIBN), by means of a bias-tee (Marki Microwave, BT-0024SMG), mounted very close to the device. The same bias-tee can be also alternatively used for injection locking of the QCL-FC spacing, by means of a local oscillator (fLO). The QCL-FC output beam is collimated by means of an off-axis parabolic mirror, and propagates through a spectroscopy cell, filled with methanol vapors at a selectable pressure. The OR-FC has a repetition rate tunable by ~2% around 250 MHz (frep), and covers a broad spectrum of about 7 THz. For the purposes of this setup, it is optically filtered close to the center frequency of the QCL-FC, at around 3 THz. The emitted OR-FC beam is then fully transmitted through an ad hoc oriented wire-grid polarizer (WGP), that also acts as beam coupler. In fact, the QCL-FC beam is superimposed to the OR-FC beam using the WGP, and its transmittance/reflectance ratio is selected by means of a quarter waveplate (λ/4). The superimposed FC beams are then coupled to a fast mixer, i.e., an He-cooled hot electron bolometer (HEB, Scontel Technologies, RS0.3-3T1) that performs the down-conversion to radio frequencies. The RF range, down-converted frequency comb (RF-FC) is acquired by a spectrum analyzer (Tektronix, RSA5106A) with a 40 MHz real-time bandwidth. The portion of the QCL-FC that is not used for the multi-heterodyne down-conversion, representing most of the QCL emission, is coupled to a pyroelectric detector for QCL power monitoring, and for direct absorption spectroscopy. A GPS-disciplined Rubidium-Quartz oscillator chain is used as common frequency standard for the OR-FC repetition rate stabilization, for the spectrum analyzer acquisitions, and for the local oscillator fLO.

Fig. 1: Hybrid Dual Comb Spectrometer.

a Experimental setup scheme. OR-FC: optically rectified frequency comb; QCL-FC: quantum cascade laser frequency comb; WGP: wire grid polarizer; HEB: hot-electron bolometer; SA: spectrum analyzer; BP filter: band-pass filter. b Acquisition of the heterodyne beatnotes signal (HBN) on the SA, resulting from the mixing of the OR- and QCL-FC on the HEB.

An example of the RF-FC spectrum acquired by the spectrum analyzer is presented in Fig. 1b. In the down-conversion process the OR-FC repetition frequency is tuned to have a quasi-integer ratio between the two. This configuration makes the RF-FC heterodyne beatnotes (HBNs) distinguishable while sufficiently close, so that the spectroscopic information encoded in the QCL-FC light can be easily retrieved. Figure 1b shows 12 modes retrieved in the down conversion process, but while the ones close to the edge of the spectral coverage present a low signal to noise ratio, the most intense 9 modes can be used for molecular interrogation. It can also be noted that in the acquisition timescales their linewidth is about 200–500 kHz, depending on the mode order.

Hybrid DCS acquisitions

The QCL-FC emitted frequencies can be simultaneously tuned by changing either the device driving current, its operational temperature, or, in case of active injection locking loop, by changing the local oscillator frequency fLO. This latter possibility does not add, at the moment, any improvement in terms of spectroscopic accuracy, but will be an interesting feature in the next future, as discussed in the next section. While performing these scans, we acquire both the direct absorption and the DCS signals. The former is acquired by means of a pyroelectric detector and, to this purpose, the QCL beam is first modulated by a chopper wheel (see Fig. 1a), then demodulated using a lock-in amplifier. The DCS signal is obtained by acquiring a sequence of RF-FC spectra, and then extracting the amplitude of each HBN signal. A schematic representation of the acquisition procedure is reported in Fig. 2. In this way, we simultaneously scan and acquire portions of the molecular gas sample spectrum, that are separated by the QCL-FC intermodal frequency (fIBN), along the whole QCL-FC spectral coverage. In the specific case of the device employed in this work we scan nine portions of the THz spectrum, corresponding to the nine most intense QCL-FC modes. Thanks to the frequency scale provided by the OR-FC, the RF frequencies of the HBN can be readily converted into absolute THz frequencies, as thoroughly explained in the Methods section. It is worth noticing that the proposed setup is also robust with respect to experimental instabilities (mechanical vibrations, current and temperature fluctuations). In fact, these are translated into frequency variations of the QCL-FC modes, that are taken into account thanks to the absolute frequency scale.

Fig. 2: Schematic representation of the hybrid dual-comb spectroscopy signal acquisition.

Two quantum cascade laser frequency comb (QCL-FC) modes N (red) and M (blue) spaced by (N-M)·fIBN are frequency tuned by driving current or heat sink temperature variations. This tuning corresponds to variations in the down-converted heterodyne beatnotes (HBN) signals, having amplitudes that are continuously monitored. Retrieval of the variations in the HBN amplitudes enables simultaneous reconstruction of molecular transitions that are spaced by (N-M)·fIBN in the THz frequency domain. RF: radio frequency; IQCL: QCL driving current; TQCL: QCL heat-sink temperature.

Spectroscopic measurements

In this work, the hybrid THz dual comb spectrometer has been tested on methanol vapors at low pressure, and the QCL-FC frequency scans are performed at a fixed heat sink temperature of 29.5 K, while the device current is tuned in a 15 mA current range, with steps of about 0.05 mA. Figure 3a shows the direct absorption spectroscopy signal acquired with a methanol gas pressure of 170 Pa, while scanning the QCL driving current. Two absorption profiles are clearly visible but, as this pyroelectric signal is an integral of the intensities of all the QCL-FC modes, it is possible neither to distinguish which modes are involved in the absorption, nor to retrieve the absolute frequencies of the transitions. At the same time Fig. 3b, c shows portions of the DCS signal related to the mode labeled as 11 in Fig. 1b. In fact, the two absorption profiles are attributed to this mode only, while no other transitions are probed by the other modes during the scan. It is worth noticing that all the other modes’ frequencies are also simultaneously scanned and, if there were any transition, it would have been acquired and measured by our spectrometer. The absolute frequency scale calibration procedure, described in the Methods section, is applied for QCL-comb mode 11 close to both transition linecenters, and the resulting absolute frequency is shown on the x-axis of Fig. 3b, c. From Voigt fits of experimental data, single-shot acquisition accuracy of few hundreds kHz is obtained, i.e. a relative accuracy of ~7 × 10−8 on a single measurement.

Fig. 3: Direct absorption and multi-heterodyne dual-comb spectroscopy (DCS) signals.

a Direct absorption spectroscopic signal acquired from the pyroelectric detector, as integral of all the simultaneously emitted quantum cascade laser frequency comb (QCL-FC) modes. Two absorption features are observed at different QCL driving current. b, c Multi-heterodyne DCS spectra corresponding to these absorption features. Each point corresponds to the amplitude of the heterodyne beatnote (HBN) involved in the absorption, acquired in the down-converted radio frequency frequency comb spectrum. In these spectra the HBNs present a flat top, due to frequency instabilities. As a consequence, the uncertainty bars have been calculated as standard deviation on all the points of the HBN flat top.

Thanks to the absolute frequency scale, the two methanol transitions have been identified as the (J, K) = (11, 11 → 12, 12), and the (J, K) = (12, 11 → 13, 12), where J and K are the quantum numbers identifying the total angular momentum and its projection on the molecule axis. From here on these transitions are reported as transitions T1 and T2, respectively. In order to allow comparison of the absolute center frequency with molecular databases, the self pressure shift of each transition has to be measured. For this reason, the two molecular profiles were probed and acquired at different methanol gas pressure. Figure 4 shows acquisitions of the T1 methanol transition around 3.105363 THz. The experimental data and the Voigt fits are shown at gas pressures of 100, 140, and 240 Pa (Fig. 4a–c respectively), while the last panel shows the retrieved self pressure shift. The center frequency of the transition, and the uncertainty affecting the measurement can be calculated by the linear fit shown in Fig. 4d. The frequency value extrapolated at zero gas pressure is 3105363072(141) kHz, corresponding to an accuracy of 4.5 × 10−8. The less intense transition shown in Fig. 3 corresponds to the T2 methanol transition, acquired at pressures of 100, 180 and 300 Pa, respectively. These acquisitions, together with the retrieved pressure shift, are shown in Fig. 5. The center frequency extrapolated at zero pressure is 3105511610(196) kHz, corresponding to a relative uncertainty of 6.3 × 10−8. The results of the two linear fits are summarized in Table 1.

Fig. 4: Absorption coefficient (α) acquired from the multi-heterodyne dual comb spectroscopy spectra of the transition (J, K) = (11, 11 → 12, 12).

The transition has been acquired at methanol pressures of a 100, b 140 and c 240 Pa. Each point corresponds to the amplitude of the heterodyne beatnote (HBN) involved in the absorption, acquired in the down-converted radio frequency frequency comb spectrum. In these spectra the HBNs present a flat top, due to frequency instabilities. As a consequence, the uncertainty bars have been calculated as standard deviation on all the points of the HBN flat top. d The measured pressure shift is reported in the last panel, corresponding to a slope of −2.8(0.8) kHz/Pa. The retrieved center frequency for this transition is 3105363072(141) kHz. The uncertainty on the x-axis comes from the pressure gauge instrumental limit, while the uncertainty on the frequency center is due to the precision of the Voigt fits shown in the previous panels.

Fig. 5: Absorption coefficient (α) acquired from the multi-heterodyne dual comb spectroscopy spectra of the transition (J, K) = (12, 11 → 13, 12).

The transition has been acquired at methanol pressures of a 100, b 180 and c 300 Pa. Each point corresponds to the amplitude of the heterodyne beatnote (HBN) involved in the absorption, acquired in the down-converted radio frequency frequency comb spectrum. In these spectra the HBNs present a flat top, due to frequency instabilities. As a consequence, the uncertainty bars have been calculated as standard deviation on all the points of the HBN flat top. d The measured pressure shift is reported in the last panel, corresponding to a slope of −4.7(1.0) kHz/Pa. The retrieved center frequency for this transition is 3105511610(196) kHz. The uncertainty on the x-axis comes from the pressure gauge instrumental limit, while the uncertainty on the frequency center is due to the precision of the Voigt fits shown in the previous panels.

Table 1 Self-pressure shifts retrieval.

Finally, Fig. 6 shows the transitions center frequencies retrieved in this work, compared with previously available data for the same transitions. In particular, we report comparison with data from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory Molecular Spectroscopy (JPL) Catalog, by the California Institute of Technology, based on the simulations by Xu et al.54, with other experimental measurements55, and with calculated values from the same authors. In this latter work the center frequency values were measured at 200 Pa gas pressure, while the self-pressure shift was not retrieved. For this reason, we also report experimental data of ref. 55, frequency shifted according to our measured pressure shift coefficients of −2.8(0.8) kHz/Pa for T1, and −4.7(1.0) kHz/Pa for T2 (see Table 1). Remarkably, the comparison shows that our spectrometer allows performing measurements with the same level of accuracy of state-of-the-art molecular databases (JPL database), while its accuracy improves previous experimental measurements on the same transitions by one order of magnitude. Moreover, the measurements on both transitions T1 and T2 are in full agreement with the molecular database, while we have to make a distinction when comparing to ref. 55. In fact, regarding transition T1, Fig. 6a shows that the agreement of our measurements with the values reported in the JPL catalog is very good, but these both disagree with calculated and experimental values reported in ref. 55. The self-pressure shift coefficient alters these latter data in the right direction, but not enough to provide agreement. Regarding transition T2 (Fig. 6b), while the agreement between our data and the JPL catalog is good, there is good agreement also with the other experimental value. Once again, the measured pressure shift coefficient improves the agreement on experimentally measured values.

Fig. 6: Comparison between our measured linecenters (orange) for the transitions.

a (J, K) = (11, 11 → 12, 12) and b (J, K) = (12, 11 → 13, 12), and literature values retrieved from: the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) catalog (blue), measurements at 200 Pa by Moruzzi et al.55 (green), the same values frequency shifted thanks to the self-pressure shift coefficient measured in this work (red) and calculation performed by the same authors (violet). The error bars on our measurements come from the linear fit extrapolating the linecenter frequencies at zero pressure.


We have devised a THz hybrid DCS setup capable of performing molecular multi-heterodyne spectroscopy with state-of-the-art accuracy, challenging existing molecular databases. The proof-of-principle demonstration of frequency scans over the wide spectral coverage of a a state of the art, high dynamic range QCL-FC, at this level of accuracy, can pave the way to a new generation of trace gas analyzers based on THz radiation. In fact, while the transitions probed in this work were probed by the same mode, it is easy to imagine an ad hoc designed QCL-FC capable of simultaneously probing different transitions of a molecular gas, or even transitions of different molecular samples in a low-pressure gas mixture.

The spectrometer, however, presents some limitations that can be overcome in the next future. The limited tunability of the modes of the QCL device with temperature/current scans, that in our case is of few hundreds MHz, can be more than enough to perform high-accuracy acquisitions on selected molecular transitions, but might be a limitation in the analysis of complex gas mixtures. For these challenging applications, our spectrometer can in principle be equipped with an array of slightly frequency detuned THz QCLs, as well as broader dynamic range devices, such as dispersion compensated lasers56, or saturable-absorbers-equipped QCL-FCs. These devices can provide a broader spectral coverage and, at the same time, FC operation at higher driving currents, providing higher output power and broader frequency scans. Finally, the possibility of using room temperature difference frequency generation THz QCLs57 can move our spectrometer from table-top laboratory size to in situ operation size.

The accuracy on retrieval of linecenter frequencies is limited by the signal to noise ratio of the spectroscopic acquisitions. This limitation can be readily overcome by performing acquisitions with a fully phase-locked QCL-FC48. In fact, the possibility to perform frequency scans by tuning both the device current and the local oscillator frequency with active injection locking, confirms the feasibility of these acquisitions, and provides complete and independent control on the frequencies of the individual QCL-FC modes. This mode of operation was demonstrated for direct absorption spectroscopy21,58, and we therefore expect to improve the accuracy of our spectrometer by one order of magnitude, shifting the spectroscopic accuracy limit to the Doppler broadened transition profiles acquired. This further limitation can be overcome using sub-Doppler spectroscopic techniques, that are precluded to DC-FCs-based DCS, but can be implemented in our spectrometer, thanks to the significantly higher output power provided by a QCL-FC. Indeed, saturation effects and pump and probe setups have been implemented with QCL-based spectrometers59,60, although no metrological-grade measurements have been obtained yet. Finally, although having low finesse values, newly developed THz resonant cavities61,62 can also help to further enhance the spectrometer sensitivity, as routinely done in the visible or near infrared spectral domains63.


Absolute frequency scale calibration

The absolute frequency of each and every QCL-FC emitted mode can be retrieved thanks to the absolute frequency scale provided by the phase stabilized OR-FC, as schematically depicted in Fig. 7. The frequency of the Nth QCL-FC mode can be written as:

$$f_N = {\it{Mf}}_{\mathrm{rep}} \pm f_{\mathrm{b,N}}$$

where M is the order of the OR-FC mode beating with the Nth QCL-FC mode at higher or lower frequency, corresponding to different signs of the HBN frequency fb,N. As thoroughly explained in ref. 64, by keeping the QCL mode N frequency constant (i.e., keeping constant both operational temperature and driving current), by tuning frep and acquiring fb,N, the order M of the OR-FC mode can be unambiguously determined by a simple linear fit of eq. (1). Knowing the intermodal beatnote frequency fIBN, this also provides an absolute frequency scale for all the emitted QCL-FC modes. Indeed, the absolute frequency of each mode can be reconstructed by simply adding to the frequency of the Nth mode fIBN (or fLO in case of active injection locking), times the order difference.

Fig. 7: Illustration of the multi-heterodyne down-conversion process.

Schematic representation of the quantum cascade laser (QCL-) (red) and optically rectified (OR-) frequency comb (FC) (blue), whose modes are respectively spaced by fIBN and frep. These two repetition frequencies are tuned close to an integer ratio, allowing an ordered and distinguishable down-conversion to radio frequencies (RF). In fact, the down-converted RF-FC modes (green) are equally spaced by D, and their easily measurable RF frequencies are used to calibrate the absolute frequency scale of the QCL-FC, as described in the main text.

This procedure has been carried out twice, while the QCL is close to resonance with transitions T1 and T2, respectively. The linear fits retrieving the order of the OR-FC mode beating with QCL-FC mode 11 are presented in Fig. 8. The outcome of the fit regarding the slope are then rounded to the nearest integer, i.e., the order M of the OR-FC. Once the absolute frequency scale of the QCL-FC modes is calibrated, any variations in their frequencies, due to current or temperature tuning, as well as to experimental instabilities, is translated into exactly the same frequency variations of the corresponding HBN of the RF-FC. In this way it is possible to constantly track and monitor all the emitted QCL-FC frequencies simultaneously.

Fig. 8: Retrieval of the optically rectified frequency comb (OR-FC) modes order.

The frequency of the beatnote fb is plotted as a function of the OR-FC repetition frequency, while keeping the quantum cascade laser (QCL) driving current and operational temperature fixed. Plots a and b are relative to QCL mode 11 frequency interacting with transitions T1 and T2 respectively. The order M of the linear fit is extracted as linear slope, and then rounded to the nearest integer, i.e., M = 12455 for panel a and M = 12456 for panel b.

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Hudson, E. R., Lewandowski, H. J., Sawyer, B. C. & Ye, J. Cold molecule spectroscopy for constraining the evolution of the fine structure constant. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 143004 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Santamaria, L. et al. Assessing the time constancy of the proton-to-electron mass ratio by precision ro-vibrational spectroscopy of a cold molecular beam. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 300, 116–123 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Baron, J. et al. Order of magnitude smaller limit on the electric dipole moment of the electron. Science 343, 269–272 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Tokunaga, S. K. et al. Probing weak force-induced parity violation by high-resolution mid-infrared molecular spectroscopy. Mol. Phys. 111, 2363–2373 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Tonouchi, M. Cutting-edge terahertz technology. Nat. Photonics 1, 97–105 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Consolino, L. et al. THz QCL-based cryogen-free spectrometer for in Situ trace gas sensing. Sensors 13, 3331–3340 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kim, G.-R., Jeon, T.-I. & Grischkowsky, D. 910-m propagation of THz ps pulses through the Atmosphere. Opt. Express 25, 25422 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Locatelli, M. et al. Real-time terahertz digital holography with a quantum cascade laser. Sci. Rep. 5, 13566 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Rothbart, N., Holz, O., Koczulla, R., Schmalz, K. & Hübers, H. W. Analysis of human breath by millimeter-wave/terahertz spectroscopy. Sensors 19, 2719 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Xiao, Z. et al. Terahertz communication windows and their point-to-point transmission verification. Appl. Opt. 57, 7673 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ummethala, S. et al. THz-to-optical conversion in wireless communications using an ultra-broadband plasmonic modulator. Nat. Photonics 13, 519–524 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Gui, S., Li, J. & Pi, Y. Security imaging for multi-target screening based on adaptive scene segmentation with Terahertz Radar. IEEE Sens. J. 19, 2675–2684 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Momeni, A., Rouhi, K., Rajabalipanah, H. & Abdolali, A. An information theory-inspired strategy for design of re-programmable encrypted graphene-based coding metasurfaces at terahertz frequencies. Sci. Rep. 8, 6200 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Consolino, L., Cappelli, F., Siciliani de Cumis, M. & De Natale, P. QCL-based frequency metrology from the mid-infrared to the THz range: a review. Nanophotonics 8, 181–204 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Demtröder, W. Laser Spectroscopy 1: Basic Principles (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2014).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Consolino, L., Bartalini, S. & De Natale, P. Terahertz frequency metrology for spectroscopic applications: a review. J. Infrared, Millim., Terahertz Waves 38, 1289–1315 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Pearson, J. C. et al. Demonstration of a room temperature 2.48-2.75 THz coherent spectroscopy source. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 093105 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Cazzoli, G. & Puzzarini, C. Sub-doppler resolution in the THz frequency domain: 1 kHz accuracy at 1 THz by exploiting the lamb-dip technique. J. Phys. Chem. A 117, 13759–13766 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    De Regis, M. et al. Room-temperature continuous-wave frequency-referenced spectrometer up to 7.5 THz. Phys. Rev. Appl 10, 064041 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    De Regis, M., Consolino, L., Bartalini, S. & De Natale, P. Waveguided approach for difference frequency generation of broadly-tunable continuous-wave terahertz radiation. Appl. Sci. 8, 2374 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Bartalini, S. et al. Frequency-comb-assisted terahertz quantum cascade laser spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. X 4, 21006 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hänsch, T. W. Nobel lecture: passion for precision. Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 1297–1309 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Diddams, S. A. et al. Direct link between microwave and optical frequencies with a 300 THz femtosecond laser comb. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5102–5105 (2000).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Udem, T., Holzwarth, R. & Hänsch, T. W. Optical frequency metrology. Nature 416, 233–237 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Holzwarth, R. et al. Optical frequency synthesizer for precision spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2264–2267 (2000).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Maddaloni, P., Cancio, P. & De Natale, P. Optical comb generators for laser frequency measurement. Meas. Sci. Technol. 20(20), 1–19 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Picqué, N. & Hänsch, T. W. Frequency comb spectroscopy. Nat. Photonics 13, 146–157 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Coddington, I., Newbury, N. & Swann, W. Dual-comb spectroscopy. Optica 3, 414 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Villares, G., Hugi, A., Blaser, S. & Faist, J. Dual-comb spectroscopy based on quantum-cascade-laser frequency combs. Nat. Commun. 5, 5192 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Yasui, T., Kabetani, Y., Saneyoshi, E., Yokoyama, S. & Araki, T. Terahertz frequency comb by multifrequency-heterodyning photoconductivedetection for high-accuracy, high-resolution terahertz spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 241104 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Consolino, L. et al. Phase-locking to a free-space terahertz comb for metrological-grade terahertz lasers. Nat. Commun. 3, 1040 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Hu, G. et al. Dual terahertz comb spectroscopy with a single free-running fibre laser. Sci. Rep. 8, 11155 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Faist, J. et al. Quantum cascade laser. Science 264, 553–556 (1994).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Köhler, R. et al. Terahertz semiconductor-heterostructure laser. Nature 417, 156–159 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Vitiello, M. S., Scalari, G., Williams, B. & De Natale, P. Quantum cascade lasers: 20 years of challenges. Opt. Express 23, 5167 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Bosco, L. et al. Thermoelectrically cooled THz quantum cascade laser operating up to 210 K. Appl. Phys. Lett. 115, 010601 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kainz, M. A. et al. Thermoelectric-cooled terahertz quantum cascade lasers. Opt. Express 27, 20688 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Tzenov, P. et al. Passive and hybrid mode locking in multi-section terahertz quantum cascade lasers. N. J. Phys. 20, 053055 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Barbieri, S. et al. Coherent sampling of active mode-locked terahertz quantum cascade lasers and frequency synthesis. Nat. Photonics 5, 306–313 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Wang, F. et al. Short terahertz pulse generation from a dispersion compensated modelocked semiconductor laser. Laser Photonics Rev. 11, 1–9 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Hugi, A., Villares, G., Blaser, S., Liu, H. C. & Faist, J. Mid-infrared frequency comb based on a quantum cascade laser. Nature 492, 229–233 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Burghoff, D. et al. Terahertz laser frequency combs. Nat. Photonics 8, 462–467 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Friedli, P. et al. Four-wave mixing in a quantum cascade laser amplifier. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 222104 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Burghoff, D. et al. Evaluating the coherence and time-domain profile of quantum cascade laser frequency combs. Opt. Express 23, 1190 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Singleton, M., Jouy, P., Beck, M. & Faist, J. Evidence of linear chirp in mid-infrared quantum cascade lasers. Optica 5, 948 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Hillbrand, J., Andrews, A. M., Detz, H., Strasser, G. & Schwarz, B. Coherent injection locking of quantum cascade laser frequency combs. Nat. Photonics 13, 101–104 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Cappelli, F. et al. Retrieval of phase relation and emission profile of quantum cascade laser frequency combs. Nat. Photonics 13, 562–568 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Consolino, L. et al. Fully phase-stabilized quantum cascade laser frequency comb. Nat. Commun. 10, 2938 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Yang, Y. et al. Terahertz multiheterodyne spectroscopy using laser frequency combs. Optica 3, 499–502 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Westberg, J. et al. Terahertz dual-comb spectroscopy using quantum cascade laser frequency combs. in STu4D.2 (2018).

  51. 51.

    Sterczewski, L. A. et al. Terahertz hyperspectral imaging with dual chip-scale combs. Optica 6, 766 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Li, H. et al. Toward compact and real-time terahertz dual-comb spectroscopy employing a self-detection scheme. ACS Photonics 7, 49–56 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Garrasi, K. et al. High dynamic range, heterogeneous, terahertz quantum cascade lasers featuring thermally tunable frequency comb operation over a broad current range. ACS Photonics 6, 73–78 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Xu, L. H. et al. Torsion-rotation global analysis of the first three torsional states (νt = 0, 1, 2) and terahertz database for methanol. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 251, 305–313 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Moruzzi, G. et al. The spectrum of CH3OH between 100 and 200 cm−1: torsional and ‘forbidden’ transitions. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 144, 139–200 (1990).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Mezzapesa, F. P. et al. Tunable and compact dispersion compensation of broadband THz quantum cascade laser frequency combs. Opt. Express 27, 20231–20240 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Lu, Q., Wang, F., Wu, D., Slivken, S. & Razeghi, M. Room temperature terahertz semiconductor frequency comb. Nat. Commun. 10, 2403 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Kliebisch, O. et al. Unambiguous real-time terahertz frequency metrology using dual 10 GHz femtosecond frequency combs. Optica 5, 1431 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Consolino, L. et al. Saturated absorption in a rotational molecular transition at 2.5 THz using a quantum cascade laser. Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 021108 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Wienold, M., Alam, T., Schrottke, L., Grahn, H. T. & Hübers, H.-W. Doppler-free spectroscopy with a terahertz quantum-cascade laser. Opt. Express 26, 6692–6699 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Campa, A. et al. High-Q resonant cavities for terahertz quantum cascade lasers. Opt. Express 23, 3751 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Consolino, L. et al. Bow-tie cavity for terahertz radiation. Photonics 6, 1 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Bernhardt, B. et al. Cavity-enhanced dual-comb spectroscopy. Nat. Photonics 4, 55–57 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Consolino, L. et al. Spectral purity and tunability of terahertz quantum cascade laser sources based on intracavity difference-frequency generation. Sci. Adv. 3, e1603317 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors acknowledge financial support from the Qombs Project, EU-H2020-FET Flagship on Quantum Technologies grant no. 820419, the ERC Project 681379 (SPRINT), the EC Project 665158 (ULTRAQCL), the Italian ESFRI Roadmap (Extreme Light Infrastructure-ELI), EC–H2020 Laserlab-Europe grant agreement 654148, EPSRC (HyperTerahertz programme, EP/P021859/1). E.H.L. acknowledges support from the Royal Society and Wolfson Foundation. The article processing charges have been funded by the Qombs Project, EU-H2020-FET Flagship on Quantum Technologies grant no. 820419.

Author information




L.C. and S.B. conceived the experiment, L.C., M.N., and M.D.R. performed the measurements and analyzed the data, L.C. wrote the manuscript, M.N., M.D.R., F.C., M.S.V., and P.D.N. contributed to manuscript revision, K.G., F.P.M., and M.S.V. fabricated the THz QCL frequency comb, L.L., A.G.D., and E.H.L. grew the QCL heterostructure, L.C., M.N., M.D.R., and F.C. discussed the results, M.S.V. supervised the design and development of the THz QCL comb, the work was done under the joint supervision of P.D.N. and L.C.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luigi Consolino.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Consolino, L., Nafa, M., De Regis, M. et al. Quantum cascade laser based hybrid dual comb spectrometer. Commun Phys 3, 69 (2020).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing