Experimental test of the relation between coherence and path information

Article metrics

Abstract

Quantum coherence stemming from the superposition behaviour of a particle beyond the classical realm, serves as one of the most fundamental features in quantum mechanics. The wave-particle duality phenomenon, which shares the same origin, has a strong relationship with quantum coherence. Recently, an elegant relation between quantum coherence and path information has been theoretically derived. Here, we experimentally test such new duality by l1-norm measure and the minimum-error state discrimination. We prepare three classes of two-photon states encoded in polarisation degree of freedom, with one photon serving as the target and the other photon as the detector. We observe that wave-particle-like complementarity and Bagan’s equality, defined by the duality relation between coherence and path information, is well satisfied. Our results may shed new light on the original nature of wave-particle duality and on the applications of quantum coherence as a fundamental resource in quantum technologies.

Introduction

Coherence was recognised early as a superposition of optical fields in the theory of electromagnetic waves. Together with the energy quantisation, a quantum version of coherence has become one of the most fundamental features that can mark the departure of quantum mechanics from the classical realm1,2,3,4,5. Carrying out general quantum operations remotely under local operations and classical communication requires quantum states that contain consumable resources. Quantum entanglement is found to have strong connection with coherence6,7,8 and may even originate from it9. The development of quantum technologies demands a reassessment of fundamental resources such as quantum coherence, including relations with other quantum physical phenomena and rigorous quantitative description10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17.

Among these quantum physical phenomena, wave-particle duality has been a unified picture to fully describe the behaviour of quantum-scale objects. Quantitative characterisations of such wave-particle duality relations have been extensively investigated, aiming to set an upper bound on the sum of the wave behaviour and the particle behaviour for a given interferometer3,4. Based on the fringe visibility V of the interference pattern and the path distinguishability D, a wave-particle duality relation is given by V2 + D2 ≤ 1, which means that full wave-behaviour (V = 1) implies no particle behaviour (D = 0) and vice-versa.

Recently, Bagan et al.18 proposed another elegant relation to characterise the new wave-particle-like duality based on the coherence \(C^{l_1}\) which quantifies the wave nature of a state and the path information which is given by the minimum-error state discrimination between the detector state and the target state. In this paper, we experimentally test such new duality relation by l1-norm measure and the minimum-error state discrimination. By preparing three classes of two-photon states that have different upper bounds of quantum coherence, we are able to investigate the new wave-particle-like complementarity in different regions. In every class of state, we continuously tune the detector state and observe clear duality trade-off as well as the upper bound on the quantum coherence of the target photon. The Bagan’s equality defined by the duality relation between coherence and path information can be well satisfied.

Results

Theoretical description of the duality relation

Consider a particle (target state) entering an N-port interferometer via a generalised beam splitter. Once the particle interacts with the detector (detector state), the state of the entire system is described by

$$\left| \psi \right\rangle = \mathop {\sum}\limits_{i = 1}^N \sqrt {p_i} \left| i \right\rangle \left| {\eta _i} \right\rangle ,$$
(1)

which is the superposition of the initial target particle state \(\left| i \right\rangle\) and the detector state \(| {\eta _i} \rangle\). The coherence of the target state is given by \(C = C^{l_1}(\rho ){\mathrm{/}}N\), where \(\rho\) = \(Tr_{det}\left( {\left| \psi \right\rangle \left\langle \psi \right|} \right)\) = \(\mathop {\sum}\nolimits_{i,j = 1}^N \sqrt {p_ip_j} \langle {\eta _j|\eta _i} \rangle | i \rangle \langle j |\). \(C^{l_1}(\rho )\) = \(\mathop {\sum}\nolimits_{i \ne j} | {\rho _{ij}} |\), where \(| {\rho _{ij}} |\) is the absolute value of entry ρij of the density matrix ρ under the reference basis10. Here, C quantifies the wave nature of the target particle.

The detector states are introduced to quantify the path information of the target particle by tracing out the target particle state, \(\rho _{det}\) = \(Tr_{tar}\left( {\left| \psi \right\rangle \left\langle \psi \right|} \right)\) = \(\mathop {\sum}\nolimits_{i = 1}^N {\kern 1pt} p_i\rho _i\), where \(\rho _i = | {\eta _i} \rangle \langle {\eta _j} |\). If the detector states ρi are orthogonal, no coherence property of the target particle will be obtained. To discriminate among the detector states \(| {\eta _i} \rangle\), one employs the minimum-error strategy by using an N-element positive operator valued measure (POVM) with elements {Πi}. Then the average probability of successfully identifying the state is \(P_s\) = \(\mathop {\sum}\nolimits_{i = 1}^N {\kern 1pt} p_i\langle {\eta _j} |{\mathrm{{\Pi}}}_i| {\eta _i} \rangle\). It is proved that C and Ps satisfy the following new relation raised by ref. 18,

$$\left( {P_s - \frac{1}{N}} \right)^2 + C^2 \le \left( {1 - \frac{1}{N}} \right)^2.$$
(2)

This upper bound represents a trade-off between the path information and the coherence of the target particle. In our experiment, we consider the case of N = 2. It is worth mentioning that when N = 2, the inequality becomes an equality which we denote as Bagan’s equality. In this case, Ps can be maximised either by an optimised POVM or calculated by an analytic solution19. It should be noticed that this new definition of path information is different from ref. 3. Here, we use the success probability in minimum-error state discrimination, while ref. 3 uses the difference of two probabilities for taking either one of the two paths.

Experimental test of the duality relation

We experimentally generate the two-photon polarisation entangled state via type-II spontaneous parametric down-conversion20. As shown in Fig. 1a, a 405 nm UV laser is first coupled into a single mode fiber to acquire a high quality spatial beam profile. After adjusting the polarisation of the pump laser with a combination of a half-wave plate (HWP) and a quarter-wave plate, the pump laser enters the Sagnac interferometer and is focused on a periodically-poled Potassium Titanyl Phosphate (PPKTP) crystal. The clockwise and the anti-clockwise components then interfere at the central polarisation beam splitter (PBS) and generate a superposition state of these two components. The generated singlet state can be written as \(\left| {\psi ^ - } \right\rangle\) = \({\textstyle{1 \over {\sqrt 2 }}}\left( {\left| {H_1V_2} \right\rangle - \left| {V_1H_2} \right\rangle } \right)\). Two band pass filters centred at the desired wavelength of the down-converted photons are employed to block the UV laser. With careful alignment of the Sagnac interferometer, we are able to observe the polarisation visibility as high as 97.7% in H/V basis and 98.3% in D/A basis. Then we further characterise the entanglement quality by conducting state tomography21. The measured purity and concurrence of the entangled state is 0.963 ± 0.0016 and 0.964 ± 0.0016 respectively, which suggests that we have obtained a very pure state with high entanglement quality.

Fig. 1
figure1

Schematic view of experiment. a Experimental setup. Pairs of polarisation entangled photons are generated via spontaneous parametric downconversion in a 25 mm long periodically-poled Potassium Titanyl Phosphate (PPKTP) crystal pumped by a 405 nm UV laser with Sagnac loop scheme. After locally rotating the polarisation of one path, the photons are guided into the state generation section. By either inserting different pieces of Brewster window or place a polarisation beam splitter (PBS), three different classes of states \(\left\{ {\psi _i^I} \right\}\), \(\left\{ {\psi _i^{II}} \right\}\) and \(\left\{ {\psi _i^{III}} \right\}\) are generated. The states are then analysed by the polarisation analysis measurement setup composed of a half-wave plate (HWP), a quarter-wave plate (QWP) and a PBS. b The Brewster window characterisation. Transmission rate of fused silica is characterised with different incidence angles and polarisations. The results suggest 60° as a reasonable incidence angle

In order to observe the coherence properties of the target states, the detector states ηi should be non-orthogonal. In our experiment, we first use a HWP to generate the following two-qubit state with four components,

$$\left| \psi \right\rangle = \alpha \left| {H_1H_2} \right\rangle + \beta \left| {H_1V_2} \right\rangle + \gamma \left| {V_1H_2} \right\rangle + \delta \left| {V_1V_2} \right\rangle ,$$
(3)

where α, β, γ and δ are parameters based on the rotation in Hilbert Space. Note that these parameters are highly correlated and can be determined by the rotation angle of HWP and the normalisation condition. Since \(\left| {\psi ^ - } \right\rangle\) state is invariant under arbitrary unitary rotation in Hilbert space, polarisation-dependent loss should be additionally introduced to generate non-orthogonal basis of the detector states. Here, we choose fused silica as Brewster window to introduce this polarisation-dependent loss into the above four components.

We experimentally characterise the transmission rate of fused silica with different incidence angles and the results agree well with the theoretical prediction (see Fig. 1b). We choose 60° as the incidence angle where the transmission rate is 99.7 and 71.9% for horizontal and vertical polarisation respectively (denoted as \(\epsilon _h\) and \(\epsilon _v\)). After passing through this state preparation section the states can be described as

$$\left| \psi \right\rangle = \left| {H_t} \right\rangle \left( {\alpha \epsilon _h^n\left| {H_d} \right\rangle + \beta \epsilon _v^n\left| {V_d} \right\rangle } \right) + \left| {V_t} \right\rangle \left( {\gamma \epsilon _h^n\left| {H_d} \right\rangle + \delta \epsilon _v^n\left| {V_d} \right\rangle } \right)$$
(4)

where index n represents the number of Brewster windows we insert, and subscripts t and d represent the target and detector qubits respectively. We can see that the detector qubit state \(\left( {\alpha \epsilon _h^n\left| {H_d} \right\rangle + \beta \epsilon _v^n\left| {V_d} \right\rangle } \right)\) is not orthogonal to \(\left( {\gamma \epsilon _h^n\left| {H_d} \right\rangle + \delta \epsilon _v^n\left| {V_d} \right\rangle } \right)\), and their inner product can be tuned with the rotation angle of HWP and the number of Brewster window. We are therefore able to test Bagan’s theory in a wide range, a transition from the case of minimal coherence and maximal path information to the opposite case.

We then define a simplified parameter ζ as

$$\zeta = \sqrt {\frac{{\alpha ^2\epsilon _h^{n2} + \beta ^2\epsilon _v^{n2}}}{{\gamma ^2\epsilon _h^{n2} + \delta ^2\epsilon _v^{n2}}}} .$$
(5)

From this expression we can see that parameter ζ is determined by the rotation angle of the HWP and the transmission rates for different polarisations. Once we have fixed the rotation angle and the number of Brewster window, the state we generated is also determined. To be more specific, \(\epsilon _h^n\) and \(\epsilon _v^n\) can set the upper bound on the quantum coherence of the states, and the rotation angle of the HWP (tune α, β, γ and δ) can affect the duality trade off. As shown in Fig. 1a, by inserting 4 and 6 pieces of Brewster window (affect \(\epsilon _h^n\) and \(\epsilon _v^n\)), we are able to generate two different classes of states which we denote as \(\left\{ {\psi _i^I} \right\}\) and \(\left\{ {\psi _i^{II}} \right\}\) respectively. Here subscript “i” in the states corresponds to different HWP angles. Once \(\epsilon _h^n\) and \(\epsilon _v^n\) are fixed, then by tuning the angles of the HWP, we are able to observe the complementarity of this new duality relation. As we change the pieces of Brewster window from 4 to 6, the concurrence of the entangled state decreases from 0.795 ± 0.0039 to 0.650 ± 0.0062 while the purity of the states remains at a high level, 0.962 ± 0.0035 and 0.965 ± 0.0041, respectively. For each class of states, while we change the parameter ζ (by tuning different HWP angles), the entanglement and purity are not affected. This can be easily understood since local operations do not destroy the entanglement. For an asymptotic limit case, we use a PBS to replace the Brewster window to generate a separable state \(\left( {\left\{ {\psi _i^{III}} \right\}} \right)\). With \(\left\{ {\psi _i^{III}} \right\}\), we can observe full complementarity between quantum coherence and path information. It should be noticed that the three classes of states are not the entire states of the system but part of states retrieved in a smaller subspace with postselection. Such solution has been proven to be exactly equivalent to the ideal one by Sandu Popescu, Lucien Hardy, and Marek Zukowski22,23.

These generated states are then analysed by quantum state tomography with maximum likelihood reconstruction21. From the tomographic details, we are able to calculate both C and \(P = P_s - {\textstyle{1 \over N}}\) to estimate the wave and particle nature of the target qubit. We measure this coherence-path information duality complementarity with all three classes of states and plot the results in Fig. 2. Error bars in Fig. 2 are calculated with Monte Carlo simulation with the Poissonian statistics of the detection process taken into account. For all the three classes of states from Figs. 2a–c, as we tune the parameter ζ, we are able to observe a continuous transition between quantum coherence and path information.

Fig. 2
figure2

Experimental observation of the new wave-particle-like duality with three different classes of states. From ac, in each class of states, as we vary the parameter ζ, we experimentally observe this new relation trade-off, namely, a continuous transition between quantum coherence and path information. The blue diamonds represent the coherence properties while the red dots give the path information. As we vary the states from \(\left\{ {\psi _i^I} \right\}\) to \(\left\{ {\psi _i^{III}} \right\}\), the degree of complementarity also increases. The solid curves are the theoretical results based on the three different classes of states. Error bars are calculated with Monte Carlo simulation with the Poissonian statistics of the detection process taken into account

We can see that the measured C and P follow the theoretical curve with some small deviations. From the analytical view, the entanglement quality is reflected by the off-diagonal term of the two-qubit state density matrix. In practice, the entanglement is prepared to approach the ideal value of 0.5. We achieve 0.49 in our experiment. After tracing out the detector qubit, the quantum coherence quantity of the target qubit will reveal the imperfection with a small deviation. Another thing we should mention is that the entanglement quality do affect the degree of complementarity between quantum coherence and path information. From Figs. 2a–c, the three classes of states show apparent difference in degree of complementarity.

Apart from direct calculation of P value from the tomographic data, we also use optimised POVM to directly measure the maximum probability of successfully identifying the state with \(\left\{ {\psi _i^{III}} \right\}\). We theoretically constructed the projective operators according to the formula in ref. 24. The results are given in Fig. 3a and the measured results agree with the theoretical prediction very well. Error bars in Fig. 3a are directly calculated by using the propagation of error formulas. We have also compared the mismatch between the P values in Figs. 2c and 3a, as shown in Fig. 3b. Except for the result of \(\psi _4^{III}\), the distances between the two different results are nearly invisible, which implies that the two methods are equivalent in principle.

Fig. 3
figure3

Direct measured results of path information P and the comparison result. a Coherence of l1-norm measure and path information given by direct optimised positive operator valued measure (POVM) results of the third class state \(\left\{ {\psi _i^{III}} \right\}\). The solid curves are the theoretical results. b A comparison of Ps result between the analytic solutions and optimised POVM. Error bars in Fig. 3 are directly calculated by using the propagation of error formulas

Finally, we test the upper bound of this new duality relation by summing the square of both C and P with our experimental results. As shown in Fig. 4, all the measured results meet the Bagan’s equality with acceptable errors. Each C and P error is estimated via 1000 rounds of Monte Carlo simulation based on photon number detection governed by Possionian statistics. Considerable error bars come from the uncertainty when we measure rather small observables. All these experiment results faithfully prove the validation of this new duality relation between quantum coherence and path information.

Fig. 4
figure4

The Bagan’s equality defined by the duality relation between coherence and path information. Sum of C square and P square of all generated states are listed and compared with the theoretical bound 0.25, where the parts with grey (pink) background are the results obtained with state tomography (optimised positive operator valued measure (POVM)). All the states obey this new duality relation and Bagan’s equality is well satisfied with acceptable errors

Discussion

We have experimentally tested the recently derived duality relation between quantum coherence and path information with polarisation encoded entangled two-qubit state. We propose and demonstrate a new way to generate different classes of partial entangled states and therefore can explore Bagan’s equality for the case of N = 2 under different conditions. Note that it is impossible to obtain the same results by using classical light in our scheme and our setup. We become aware that Yuan et al. also test Bagan’s equality with heralded single photon state25. A classical light field (no matter whether a weak laser or thermal light) applied on Yuan et al.’s setup will generate exactly the same results. In our experiment, we design and prepare an exotic two-photon entangled state specifically for rigorously testing Bagan’s theory in the quantum regime.

Furthermore, our results show a potential connection between the two quantum resources of coherence and entanglement. Although Bagan’s theory doesn’t require entanglement, with different class of partial entangled quantum states, we are able to test Bagan’s duality trade-off with different degree of complementary. Since the relation between coherence and entanglement remains an important and open topic9, our scheme and setup may serve as a new platform to simultaneously investigate the roles and their relations to coherence, path information and entanglement.

Last but not least, our scheme can be extended to larger N for testing multi-path Bagan’s theory and for other quantum tasks. The key operation in generating our exotic two-photon entangled states is to introduce polarisation-dependent differential transmission rates on each arm of a Bell state. Such operation can be also applied onto other multi-photon states, such as GHZ states, cluster states and even multi-photon mixed states. Especially applying our operation onto GHZ states will enable a genuine test of multi-path Bagan’s theory, which will go beyond equality and test the duality between coherence and path information in an inequality fashion. There have been demonstrations of high fidelity multi-photon entanglement state26,27, thus it is experimentally feasible to generate a multi-path exotic state of our type to test Bagan’s theory and to explore the relation between coherence, path information and multi-partite entanglement, even though much technical effort still remains to be made.

The wave-particle duality relations are of significance in quantum mechanics, while the quantum coherence plays a central role in quantum information processing. Our results may inspire further theoretical and experimental investigations on such fundamental researches and strengthen the prominent role of coherence in quantum physics and quantum technologies.

Methods

Experiments

Entangled photon pairs are generated by using type-II spontaneous parametric down-conversion. A 5 mW 405 nm laser diode pumps a 25 mm periodically-poled KTiOPO4 (PPKTP) crystal in a Sagnac interferometer. The beam spot size at the center of the crystal is 220 μm. The degenerate downconversion photon pairs at 810 nm are filtered by 3 nm bandpass filter, then coupled into single mode fibers and guided to the state preparation stage. The coincidence rate is about 30 kHz. By either inserting Brewster windows or place a PBS, three different classes of states can be generated. Photons are analysed by quantum state tomography and detected by single-photon counting modules (SPCM).

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Scully, M. O., Englert, B.-G. & Walther, H. Quantum optical tests of complementarity. Nature 351, 111–116 (1991).

  2. 2.

    Bohr, N. The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory. Nature 121, 580 (1928).

  3. 3.

    Englert, B. Fringe visibility and which-way information: an inequality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2154–2157 (1996).

  4. 4.

    Jaeger, G., Shimony, A. & Vaidman, L. Two interferometric complementarities. Phys. Rev. A. 51, 54 (1995).

  5. 5.

    Barbieri, M., Goggin, M. E., Almeida, M. P., Lanyon, B. P. & White, A. G. Complementarity in variable strength quantum non-demolition measurements. New J. Phys. 11, 093012 (2009).

  6. 6.

    Chitambar et al. Assisted distillation of quantum coherence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 070402 (2016).

  7. 7.

    Streltsov, A. et al. Entanglement and coherence in quantum state merging. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 240405 (2016).

  8. 8.

    Killoran, N., Steinhoff, F. E. S. & Plenio, M. B. Converting nonclassicality into entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 080402 (2016).

  9. 9.

    Streltsov, A., Singh, U., Dhar, H. S., Bera, M. N. & Adessot, G. Measuring quantum coherence with entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 020403 (2015).

  10. 10.

    Baumgratz, T., Cramer, M. & Plenio, M. B. Quantifying coherence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 140401 (2014).

  11. 11.

    Napoli, C. et al. Robustness of coherence: an operational and observable measure of quantum coherence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 150502 (2016).

  12. 12.

    Ma., J.-J., Yadin, B., Girolami, D., Vedral, V. & Gu, M. Converting coherence to quantum correlations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 160407 (2016).

  13. 13.

    Zhang, Y.-R., Shao, L.-H., Li, Y. & Fan, H. Quantifying coherence in infinite-dimensional systems. Phys. Rev. A. 93, 012334 (2016).

  14. 14.

    Cheng, S. & Hall, M. J. W. Complementarity relations for quantum coherence. Phys. Rev. A. 92, 042101 (2015).

  15. 15.

    Singh, U., Zhang, L. & Pati, A. K. Average coherence and its typicality for random pure states. Phys. Rev. A. 93, 032125 (2016).

  16. 16.

    Rana, S., Parashar, P. & Lewenstein, M. Trace-distance measure of coherence. Phys. Rev. A. 93, 012110 (2016).

  17. 17.

    Bera, M. N., Qureshi, T., Siddiqui, M. A. & Pati, A. K. Duality of quantum coherence and path distinguishability. Phys. Rev. A. 92, 012118 (2015).

  18. 18.

    Bagan, E., Bergou, J. A., Cottrell, S. S. & Hillery, M. Relations between coherence and path information. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 160406 (2016).

  19. 19.

    Qiu, D. & Li, L. Minimum-error discrimination of quantum states: bounds and comparisons. Phys. Rev. A. 81, 042329 (2010).

  20. 20.

    Kim, T., Fiorentino, M. & Wong, F. N. C. Phase-stable source of polarisation-entangled photons using a polarisation Sagnac interferometer. Phys. Rev. A. 73, 012316 (2006).

  21. 21.

    James, D. F. V., Kwiat, P. G., Munro, W. J. & White, A. G. Measurement of qubits. Phys. Rev. A. 64, 052312 (2001).

  22. 22.

    Popescu, S., Hardy, L. & Zukowski, M. Revisiting Bell’s theorem for a class of down-conversion experiments. Phys. Rev. A. 56, R4353(R) (1997).

  23. 23.

    Pan, J.-W. et al. Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 777 (2012).

  24. 24.

    Barnett, S. M. & Croke, S. Quantum state discrimination. Adv. Opt. Photon. 1, 238–278 (2009).

  25. 25.

    Yuan, Y. et al. Experimental demonstration of wave-particle duality relation based on coherence measure. Opt. Express 26, 4470–4478 (2018).

  26. 26.

    Wang, X.-L. et al. Experimental ten-photon entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 210502 (2016).

  27. 27.

    Zhang, C., Huang, Y.-F., Liu, B.-H., Li, C.-F. & Guo, G.-C. Experimental generation of a high-fidelity four-photon linear cluster state. Phys. Rev. A. 93, 062329 (2016).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank J.W. Pan for helpful discussions. This work was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFA0303700); National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (61734005, 11761141014, 11690033); Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (STCSM) (15QA1402200, 16JC1400405, 17JC1400403); Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (SMEC)(16SG09, 2017-01-07-00-02-E00049); X.M.J. acknowledges support from the National Young 1000 Talents Plan. S.M.F. acknowledges support from NSFC under No. 11675113 and Key Project of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education under No. KZ201810028042. V. V thanks the Oxford Martin School, Wolfson College and the University of Oxford, the Leverhulme Trust (UK), the John Templeton Foundation, the EU Collaborative Project TherMiQ (Grant Agreement 618074), the COST Action MP1209, the EPSRC (UK) and the Ministry of Manpower (Singapore). This research is also supported by the National Research Foundation, Prime Ministers Office, Singapore, under its Competitive Research Programme (CRP Award No. NRF- CRP14-2014-02) and administered by Centre for Quantum Technologies, National Universityof Singapore.

Author information

X.M.J. conceived the project and designed the experiment. Z.H.M., S.M.F. and V.V. developed the theory. J.G., Z.Q. J., C.H., L.F.Q, R.J.R., H.T. and X.M.J. performed the experiment. J.G., X.M.J., Z.H.M. and S.M.F. analysed the data and wrote the paper.

Correspondence to Xian-Min Jin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.