Perovskites fabricated on textured silicon surfaces for tandem solar cells

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 22 May 2020

This article has been updated


The silicon surface texture significantly affects the current density and efficiency of perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells. However, only a few studies have explored fabricating perovskite on textured silicon and the effect of texture on perovskite films because of the limitations of solution processes. Here we produce conformal perovskite on textured silicon with a dry two-step conversion process that incorporates lead oxide sputtering and direct contact with methyl ammonium iodide. To separately analyze the influence of each texture structure on perovskite films, patterned texture, high-resolution photoluminescence (μ-PL), and light beam-induced current (μ-LBIC), 3D mapping is used. This work elucidates conformal perovskite on textured surfaces and shows the effects of textured silicon on the perovskite layers with high-resolution 3D mapping. This approach can potentially be applied to any type of layer on any type of substrate.


The power conversion efficiency (PCE) of perovskite solar cells has significantly increased from 3.81 to 25.2% (refs. 1,2,3) in the past nine years. In the case of silicon solar cells, a record efficiency of 26.7% has been reported, which is very close to the theoretical efficiency limit1,4,5,6. To overcome the efficiency limit of a single-junction device, a perovskite/silicon tandem approach can be used because of several advantages of perovskite solar cells, including tunable bandgap7,8, easy fabrication9,10, and high efficiency11,12. To produce perovskite/silicon two-terminal tandem solar cells, several hundred nanometers of conformal perovskite layer should be fabricated on a micrometer-sized pyramidal textured silicon surface because high-efficiency silicon solar cells require surface texture to maximize light absorption6,13,14,15. However, most perovskite solar cells are manufactured by solution-based processes that cannot be used on the micrometer-sized textured structure. Not only perovskite absorber layer, but also the other components like electron transfer layer (ETL) and hole transfer layer (HTL) have been mainly produced by solution process. As a consequence, most two-terminal perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells have been produced with flat silicon front surfaces16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23; flat surfaces restrict the light absorption and current density, which has the greatest effect on the PCE, as shown in Fig. 1. Figure 1 was constructed based on the literature results as shown in Supplementary Table 1. The red lines and numbers denote the results of a linear fitting and the slope, respectively. The slopes had been obtained by linear regression fitting. Statistically, the current density exhibits the greatest correlation with the PCE. If we can obtain 1 mA/cm2 more current density, 1.61 percentage point more efficiency will be obtained. The use of antireflection foils on top of the tandem device has been studied as one way to achieve high current density. Referring to literature results, however, eventually forming perovskite on textured silicon will generate maximum current density24,25,26. Therefore, a technique to produce a conformal perovskite layer and other solar cell components on a textured surface is required. Perovskite solar cell fabrication processes can be classified into five methods (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). One of the strong candidates is the evaporation incorporated process27,28,29. With a hybrid process combining evaporated precursor and solution-based conversion processes, Sahli et al. reported a 25.2% perovskite/fully textured silicon tandem solar cell30,31. However, the processing conditions for organic material evaporation are challenging, and problems can exist in the large area process. Another competitive candidate is the dry two-step conversion process32,33,34,35. If the conformal precursor can be secured, a conformal layer and large area uniformity can be expected. Superior process flexibility is also obtainable by controlling the conversion conditions and precursor properties, such as composition, morphology, and crystallinity, which can be managed by pretreatment or posttreatment.

Fig. 1: Relationship between efficiency and parameters of perovskite/silicon two-terminal tandem solar cells.

Dependence of efficiency on a short-circuit current density, b open-circuit voltage, c fill factor, and d device area.

Here, we propose a way to produce conformal perovskite on textured silicon with a dry two-step conversion process, and investigation with patterned texture and high-resolution 3D mappings.

Results and discussion

Perovskites on flat surfaces

We first tried to produce a conformal perovskite layer by a one-step spin-coating method and a two-step hybrid method. We had adopted the PbO precursor that can be easily deposited by sputtering process. Perovskite solar cells with PbO-based conversion process previously reported on flat surface36,37,38. Zhang Z. et al. had reported 14.1% with sputtered PbO and MAI solution dipping conversion process36. Yan-Lin Song et al. had reported 14.6% with PbO electro deposition and MAI spin-coating conversion37,39. In our case, with the textured surface and a solution-based process, uniform films were not obtained even with a conformal precursor (Supplementary Fig. 1). As a next step, the dry two-step conversion process was investigated and Fig. 2 illustrates the proposed process. The PbO precursor was first deposited by sputtering process, and converted into perovskite by direct contact with MAI and annealing.

Fig. 2: Schematic of a proposed dry two-step conversion process for conformal perovskite fabrication on textured silicon surfaces.

Indium tin oxide (ITO), titanium dioxide (TiO2), and PbO layers were first deposited on a textured silicon surface by means of sputtering to form the bottom electrode, ETL, and precursor, respectively. Subsequently, a perovskite layer was converted by direct contact with MAI powder and annealing.

The dry two-step conversion was first verified with flat fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) substrates. Conformal 80 nm PbO films were sputtered and converted into CH3NH3PbI3 layers through a direct contact reaction with CH3NH3I powder at 100, 150, 170, 200, and 250 °C for 35, 70, 140, and 210 min. As shown in Fig. 3a, as reaction temperature and time increased, the films gradually changed to yellow PbI2 and then turned into a dark brown colored perovskite. In the case of 250 °C, MAI was burned, and in the process of removing reminded MAI by nitrogen gas (N2) blowing and isopropyl alcohol (IPA) rinsing after the reaction finished, all the films were removed together. These tendency was also observed at light absorptance, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image, and normalized X-ray diffraction (XRD) results as shown in Fig. 3b–d. Normalization was conducted based on the maximum intensity to the ratio of PbOx, PbI2, and CH3NH3PbI3 intensity. The peak positions of each component were 30.5°, 12.8°, and 14.3° 2-theta degrees37. Supplementary Figs. 27 show additioal informations, including the light absorption at the full wavelength, the cross section of the SEM, the diffraction intensity of the XRD at the entire angle, shorter time conversion result at 200 °C, 250 °C, tauc plot result for optical bandgap calculation, and the effect of the MAI amount on the conversion process. The dependence on the amount of MAI in the reaction was not significant within the experiment conditions.

Fig. 3: Characteristic of films produced by the dry two-step conversion on a flat surface with different conversion time and temperature.

a Digital camera image of corresponding films on a 1.5 cm × 1.5 cm TiO2/FTO substrate, b light absorptance at 550 nm, and c SEM top view. d Normalized XRD peak intensity at 30.5° for PbO, 12.8° for PbI2, and 14.3° for CH3NH3PbI3.

To the next, perovskite solar cells were produced based on the investigated conversion conditions. Figure 4 shows the solar cell parameter distributions produced at different conversion condition. Amount of MAI was fixed at 5.0 g. A 11.1% PCE was obtained at 200 °C 70 min conversion condition. For the perovskite solar cell, we used TiO2 ETL and 2,2ʹ,7,7ʹ-tetrakis(N,N-di-p-methoxyphenyl-amine)-9,9ʹ-spirobifluorene (Spiro-MeOTAD) HTL, which achieved ~20% PCE in our previous paper40. The LIV curves and the current tracking results for each solar cells are shown in the Supplementary Figs. 8 and 9, and Supplementary Tables 3 and 4.

Fig. 4: Solar cell parameter distributions converted at different conditions.

Eight solar cells were produced for each condition. a Open-circuit voltage, b short-circuit current density, c fill factor, and d power conversion efficiencty. Hysteresis was large when measuring solar cell efficiency, and there were cases where FF was over estimated. Each data point was adopted from the LIV reverse scan results and the measurements were conducted with 0.078 cm2 shadow mask under the AM1.5 G condition. The area of the mask was measured by optical microscope and equipment at Korea Institute of Energy Research.

Perovskites on textured silicon surfaces

A conformal precursor is a prerequisite for conformal perovskite on a textured silicon surface. The 4-inch uniformity of the sputtered PbO precursor films on the textured surface was demonstrated by the thickness, crystallinity, and chemical bonding ratio, SEM, XRD, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. A thickness uniformity of 8.3 and 4.0% chemical bonding ratio uniformity were obtained (Supplementary Figs. 10 and 11, Supplementary Table 5). With this uniform precursor layer, the dry two-step conversion process was performed. The obtained perovskite film quality was investigated by SEM and high-resolution photoluminescence (μ-PL)41,42 3D mapping, which will be described in the next section. A conformally deposited perovskite film was observed, as shown in Fig. 5a–f. Less than 10% optical reflectance was obtained in the range 300–1100 nm, as shown in Fig. 5g; this effect can contribute to high current density output for tandem solar cells. Figure 5h, i shows the μ-PL emission peak position and peak intensity across the scanning area of ~20 μm × 20 μm. An emission peak position of 765–770 nm, which is well matched with perovskite bandgap energy and the other group reports was observed41. In the case of PL intensity, there was very large variation from 0 to 1. This variation in PL intensity could be an indication of the perovskite quality difference depending on the film location above the substrate texture, for example, on a pyramid tip or in a valley.

Fig. 5: Conformal perovskite on a randomly textured silicon surface.

ac SEM image of conformal perovskite on silicon with backscattered electron mode; df top view SEM image with secondary electron mode; g reflectance of perovskite produced using the dry two-step process on randomly textured silicon; h μ-PL peak position; and i normalized PL emission intensity. The sample structure is perovskite/TiO2/silicon.

Detailed analysis with V-groove texture and 3D mapping

Few studies have explored the influence of textured silicon on perovskite films because of several obstacles in investigation. (1) Producing perovskite on textured silicon surfaces has limitation in fabrication process. (2) The random nature of conventional textured silicon makes it difficult to find exact relations between the texture structure and perovskite film. (3) The thickness scale difference between the textured silicon and the perovskite layer makes it difficult to choose an analysis tool. Therefore, an appropriate fabrication process and analysis method are required. The production of a perovskite layer on a textured surface is solved by the dry two-step conversion process. To settle the problem of randomness, we used periodically structured textures, namely, V-groove textures15 with flat surfaces and tips, as shown in Fig. 6. μ-PL and μ-light beam-induced current (μ-LBIC)41,42 3D mapping, which can show not only comprehensive but also local information about films and devices, were adopted as analysis methods. Since several hundred nanometers of perovskite layer is located on the micrometer-sized pyramidal textured silicon surface, and the measurements have to maintain high spatial and depth resolution simultaneously, only XY 2D mapping cannot provide accurate information, as shown Supplementary Fig. 14. To overcome these issues, we applied XYZ 3D mapping. Several XY 2D maps were measured first for different depths Z, as shown in Fig. 7a, b. The strongest PL signal among the different Z was adopted as representative PL data at that XY position, and this depth Z was used to construct the focus height. All the collected images were combined into a final 2D image. Figure 7c–e represents combined 2D images of the focus height, normalized PL intensity, and peak position, respectively. Figure 7f shows the SEM top view of the corresponding device. The focus height well follows the adopted V-groove texture topography, and this finding means the measurement was conducted with in focus. PL emission was obtained at ~764–768 nm.

Fig. 6: SEM image of a periodically patterned texture and layer of perovskite fabricated on it.

a V-groove textured substrate produced by photolithography and wet etching. b, c TiO2 and PbO deposited on the V-groove textured silicon. df SEM images of perovskite on the V-groove texture with flat surfaces, and gi tips. The interval and size of the patterned texture were controlled based on the experimental purpose. The detailed process is described in the Methods section. The optical reflectance data for the V-groove texture are also provided in Supplementary Fig. 12 and Supplementary Table 6.

Fig. 7: Results of 3D mapping analysis for perovskite on periodically textured silicon.

a μ-PL 2D maps with different depths. b Schematic diagram of the μ-PL and μ-LBIC 3D mapping method. ce Combined image of the collective 2D maps. c Focus height, d PL peak position, e normalized PL intensity, and f corresponding SEM image. The results of PL mapping using different size V-groove textures are in Supplementary Fig. 13. The PL intensity and the peak position dependency on location were the same even when the length of the slope was changed. Displaying the PL spectrum at a specific position for specific focus heights are shown in the Supplementary Fig. 14. Measurements were conducted with a spatial raster of 250 nm and Z distance of 250 nm. The details of the measurement setup are described in the characterization section.

In the case of PL intensity, there was a very large distribution from 0 to 1, similar to the result shown in Fig. 5i. With the patterned texture, we could clearly designate the PL peak position and PL intensity variation to a specific location of the textured silicon. This result is evidence of the film quality variation affected by particular substrate structures and locations. Longer wavelengths and higher intensities were observed at flat surfaces. Shorter wavelengths and lower intensities were observed at the edges of flat surfaces and at valleys, where the substrate was bent. To understand the relationship between PL difference and device performance, we applied μ-LBIC 3D mapping to a completed device with a structure of Au/ITO/MoOx/perovskite/TiO2/ITO/textured Si, as shown in Fig. 8. The ITO electrodes and ETL were fabricated using a sputtering process. MoOx (refs. 43,44,45; which was adopted as HTL) and the Au electrode were produced through thermal evaporation. In the case of a device on a conventional texture, it is difficult to accurately determine the relationship between the amount of current and the substrate structure. However, certain current patterns were identified when V-groove textures were applied. The highest current outputs were obtained at the flat surfaces, and relatively low current outputs were observed at the tips and valleys of the V-groove texture. These results indicate an adverse effect of the substrate on the perovskite device at the locations where the substrate is bent. These locations correspond to where the shorter PL emission wavelengths and lower intensities were obtained. Similar results were obtained with c-AFM leakage current mapping. Supplementary Fig. 15 shows the 3D and 2D views of the leakage current mapping results. The leakage current occurred periodically at the edges of the flat surfaces. The low performance at bent locations can be attributed to the stress induced on the perovskite by the textured silicon during the conversion process.

Fig. 8: Result of perovskite solar cell fabrication and analysis on patterned silicon texture.

a Schematic diagram of a perovskite solar cells on a textured silicon surfaces. b Digital camera image of an actual device. The inset red dotted line square in a corresponds to the inset red dotted line square in b and measurement result in d. μ-LBIC 3D mapping results of the perovskite solar cell on c random texture, d V-groove with flat zones, and e V-groove with tips. Most of the dark areas of the PL and LBIC mapping actually showed very small values rather than actual zero. But there were actually zero part in the raw data. These parts can be shunt points. This kind of problem can be occurred during the deposition of HTL, buffer layers, and transparent electrodes sputtering process. fh show SEM images of each device. The SEM images are obtained from different areas of the corresponding samples.

Stress analysis and methods for stress relaxation

The stress affects the electronic structure, carrier mobility, and corresponding perovskite solar cell performance46,47,48,49,50. Approximately two-fold volume expansion was reported when using PbI2 precursor51, and we observed approximately five-fold volume expansion during the PbO conversion process (Supplementary Fig. 16). To investigate stress inducement, Silvaco Athena (ver.5.22.1.R) software simulation, which is specialized in stress simulation was performed using the perovskite and silicon material constants52,53. The detailed equations and results are shown in Fig. 9 (Supplementary Table 7, Supplementary Equation 2). The perovskite materials on the V-groove texture was constructed. A temperature of 200 °C was applied, and then, the material was cooled down to room temperature. To express the 3D stress in 2D, stresses applied in the x-direction of the x-plane (Fig. 9a, d, e) and the y-direction of the y-plane (Fig. 9b, f, g) were calculated, and expressed in the z-plane (Fig. 9c). The most stressed area corresponded to the valley and perovskite/Si interface near the valley, as shown in Fig. 9e, g, followed by the slope and edges of the flat surfaces.

Fig. 9: Stress simulation results of perovskite solar cells on a patterned silicon texture.

a, d, e Stresses applied in the x-direction of the x-plane and b, f, g the y-direction of the y-plane are expressed in 2D at the z-plane. a and e present the magnified views of the inset squares in d. b and g present the magnified views of the inset squares in f. The amount of stress varies based on how the initial internal stress is set, although the tendency of the stress distribution does not change.

Given the relationships among the stress simulation, μ-PL and µ-LBIC 3D mapping, and the c-AMF measurements, the locations where lower device performance was obtained were the locations where the stress applied to the device changed significantly. This occurred where the structure of the substrate was bent. As a possible solution to reduce the stress of perovskite on textured surfaces, we investigated using porous precursor and substrate chemical rounding methods54. These processes can produce spare space for the conversion process, and soften the bent and sharp structures. The porous precursor was fabricated by treating PbO with HF vapor, which was generated at 40 °C. Substrate rounding was performed by dipping the textured silicon substrate in a 1:50 (% (v/v)) solution of diluted HF and HNO3 at room temperature54. Supplementary Figs. 17 and 18 show the results of HF treatment and chemical rounding. With increasing HF exposure time, larger perovskite grains were observed. Increasing rounding times gave more spaces for perovskite conversion, particularly at the valley as shown in Supplementary Figs. 1719. Supplementary Fig. 19 shows a normalized XRD peak comparison at the (110) and (310) planes (Supplementary Figs. 20 and 21, Supplementary Table 8). Perovskite produced by the one-step spin-coating method on a flat surface shows XRD peaks at 14.05° and 31.81°. However, for the dry two-step conversion process on the textured surface, the XRD peaks shifted to 14.20° and 31.99°. By applying the HF-treated precursor, the peaks shifted to 14.16° and 31.91°, which are closer to those of the reference film. In contrast, the substrate rounding process was not effective in reducing the peak shift. Based on the XRD results and previously reported elastic constants of CH3NH3PbI3 (refs. 55,56), the amount of stress was calculated. If we assume that the one-step spin-coated perovskite is stress free, ~106–212 MPa stress is induced in the perovskite film on the textured surface. With the HF-treated precursor, the stress is reduced to ~77–155 MPa. The effect of HF treatment was also investigated by μ-PL 3D mapping, as shown in Fig. 10. HF treatment reduced PL intensity and emission peak differences among the entire area and surfaces. This finding possibly means that this treatment reduced the stressed area and adverse effects of substrates. As a consequence, porous precursors have the potential to be applied in producing high-efficiency perovskites on textured silicon surfaces in extended studies.

Fig. 10: μ-PL 3D mapping results of perovskite fabricated with HF-treated PbO precursors.

a, b Focus height, c, d normalized PL intensity, e, f peak position, g, h corresponding SEM images of converted perovskite, and i, j HF-treated PbO precursor.

In conclusion, we tried to address the problems of (1) producing conformal perovskite on textured silicon surfaces, (2) analyzing perovskite on textured surfaces caused by the randomness of conventional textured silicon, and (3) the size-scale difference between the textured silicon and the perovskite layer. We demonstrated the dry two-step conversion process to produce conformal perovskite solar cells on a textured silicon surface. This process can also be applied to upscaling of perovskite as shown in our previous result57. To clearly distinguish the effects of different texture structures, we adopted a patterned texture, the so-called V-groove texture. The produced perovskite layers were investigated in detail with μ-PL and μ-LBIC 3D mapping, stress simulation, and c-AFM. We observed a disadvantageous effect of substrates on the device performance at the bent and stressed positions. As a way to enhance perovskite film quality, we proposed HF treatment and substrate chemical rounding processes, and HF treatment showed an ~50 MPa stress-relaxing effect and enhanced film quality.

The dry two-step conversion process investigated here can regulate the composition and quality of the perovskite film by controlling the conversion process or precursor compositions. Posttreatments and pretreatments are also productively adoptable, as shown in this paper. The fabrication and analysis method introduced here can be applied to any type of layer on any type of substrate.


Conformal perovskite layer and solar cell fabrication

FTO glass substrates (7 Ω/sq), 600 μm n-type polished semiconductor wafers, and silicon solar wafers, which were textured on both sides, were used as substrates. The flat substrates were cleaned with acetone, ethanol, and IPA prior to being used for producing perovskite solar cells. Subsequently, an ultraviolet ozone treatment was applied for 30 min. To create a device on the textured silicon surface, a transparent bottom ITO electrode was produced by sputtering over the differently textured substrates. With respect to the conformal ETM, TiO2 was fabricated by RF magnetron sputtering. A conformal PbOx precursor layer was also deposited by RF magnetron sputtering. The precursor films were converted into perovskite by direct contact with MAI powder (Greatcell Solar). The MAI powder was directly spread over the precursor film and annealed at respective temperature for respective times in air. After the reaction finished, remaining MAI were removed by N2 gas blowing, IPA rinsing, and dried by spinning. Similar to conformal HTL, MoOx was fabricated by thermal evaporation. Subsequently, a 150 nm ITO layer was formed through sputtering, and a 100 nm Au electrode was finally deposited by thermal evaporation.

V-groove fabrication

V-groove substrates were fabricated by combining photolithography techniques with wet etching15. First, 200 nm SiNx etching barriers were deposited by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition on a 600 μm n-type polished semiconductor wafer. To form a specific pattern on the wafer, a 2 μm coating of positive photoresist (PR) was formed by spin coating and was exposed to light for 2.8 s with a pattern mask. Subsequently, pattern development was performed. The PR deposition and pattern-developing processes were conducted at the Korea Advanced Nano Fab Center (KANC). The etching barriers were selectively etched out by immersing in buffered-oxide etchant for 9 min. After the local etching barrier was removed, the residual PR was removed with the help of acetone and IPA. With respect to the texturing process, samples were immersed in potassium hydroxide (KOH) at 80 °C and then in a distilled water solution of an additive for 30 min. Finally, any residual SiNx was removed by immersing the samples in diluted hydrogen fluoride for 5 min.


Light absorbance, reflectance, and transmittance were measured by UV-vis spectroscopy (JASCO V-670 UV/Vis NIR spectrophotometer), and XRD (SmartLab, Rigaku) was performed using CuKα radiation (1.54 nm). JV scans were performed in the direction of the open-circuit voltage to the short-circuit current (i.e., reverse), and the voltage setting time was 200 ms. An XE-100 (Park Systems, Korea) AFM system was adopted for the c-AFM measurements. External quantum efficiency measurements were conducted using a PV measurement system with a chopping frequency of 100 Hz.

The solar cell performance of perovskite solar cells were measured by a solar simulator (WACOM WXS-155S10 class AAA) with 100 mW × cm−2 irradiation with Xe lamp. Modulated reference silicon solar cells were used for calibration prior to measurement. Photo-generation current as a function of voltage were measured by a source meter (Keithley 2400). All devices had measured using a proper size shadowing mask. The scan voltage setting time was 200 ms.

μ-PL and μ-LBIC 3D mapping

The μ-PL and μ-LBIC mappings were performed using a PL spectroscopy setup based on a confocal microscope. The samples were illuminated from the top. The point-shaped excitation and detection allows for diffraction-limited resolution while using an objective lens with a high numerical aperture (NA). In this case, an objective lens with an NA of 0.9 was used. For all measurements, an excitation wavelength of 635 nm, illumination intensity of 10 μW, and laser spot with a diameter of 0.5 μm were selected. For the detection of the PL signal, a silicon line CCD combined with a grating spectrometer was used, and this combination provided the PL spectrum for each pixel. To suppress the excitation light, a 700 nm longpass filter was applied. Both the spectral position and peak height were obtained by a Gaussian fit to the measurement data. The local light beam-induced current signal was amplified with the help of a low noise preamplifier.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available within the Supplementary Information and from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Change history


  1. 1.

    NREL. Best research-cell efficiencies. (2019).

  2. 2.

    Kojima, A., Teshima, K., Shirai, Y. & Miyasaka, T. Organometal halide perovskites as visible-light sensitizers for photovoltaic cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 6050–6051 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Green, M. A. et al. Solar cell efficiency tables (version 54). Prog. Photovolt. 27, 565–575 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Shockley, W. & Queisser, H. J. Detailed balance limit of efficiency of p‐n junction solar cells. J. Appl. Phys. 32, 510–519 (1961).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Richter, A., Hermle, M. & Glunz, S. W. Reassessment of the limiting efficiency for crystalline silicon solar cells. IEEE J. Photovolt. 3, 1184–1191 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Yoshikawa, K. et al. Silicon heterojunction solar cell with interdigitated back contacts for a photoconversion efficiency over 26%. Nat. Energy 2, 17032 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Noh, J. H., Im, S. H., Heo, J. H., Mandal, T. N. & Seok, S. I. Chemical management for colorful, efficient, and stable inorganic–organic hybrid nanostructured solar cells. Nano Lett. 13, 1764–1769 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    McMeekin, D. P. et al. A mixed-cation lead mixed-halide perovskite absorber for tandem solar cells. Science 351, 151–155 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ahn, N. et al. Highly reproducible perovskite solar cells with average efficiency of 18.3% and best efficiency of 19.7% fabricated via Lewis base adduct of lead (II) iodide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 8696–8699 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Burschka, J. et al. Sequential deposition as a route to high-performance perovskite-sensitized solar cells. Nature 499, 316 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Shin, S. S. et al. Colloidally prepared La-doped BaSnO3 electrodes for efficient, photostable perovskite solar cells. Science 356, 167–171 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Yang, W. S. et al. Iodide management in formamidinium-lead-halide–based perovskite layers for efficient solar cells. Science 356, 1376–1379 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Zhao, J., Wang, A., Green, M. A. & Ferrazza, F. 19.8% Efficient “honeycomb” textured multicrystalline and 24.4% monocrystalline silicon solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 1991–1993 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Campbell, P. & Green, M. A. Light trapping properties of pyramidally textured surfaces. J. Appl. Phys. 62, 243–249 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Borojevic, N., Lennon, A. & Wenham, S. Light trapping structures for silicon solar cells via inkjet printing. Phys. Status Solidi A 211, 1617–1622 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Mailoa, J. P. et al. A 2-terminal perovskite/silicon multijunction solar cell enabled by a silicon tunnel junction. Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 121105 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bush, K. A. et al. 23.6%-efficient monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells with improved stability. Nat. Energy 2, 17009 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Werner, J. et al. Efficient monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cell with cell area > 1 cm2. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 161–166 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Werner, Jrm et al. Efficient near-infrared-transparent perovskite solar cells enabling direct comparison of 4-terminal and monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem cells. ACS Energy Lett. 1, 474–480 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Sahli, F. et al. Improved optics in monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells with a nanocrystalline silicon recombination junction. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1701609 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Albrecht, S. et al. Monolithic perovskite/silicon-heterojunction tandem solar cells processed at low temperature. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 81–88 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Zheng, J. et al. Large area efficient interface layer free monolithic perovskite/homo-junction-silicon tandem solar cell with over 20% efficiency. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 2432–2443 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wu, Y. et al. Monolithic perovskite/silicon-homojunction tandem solar cell with over 22% efficiency. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 2472–2479 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Jost, M. et al. Textured interfaces in monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells: advanced light management for improved efficiency and energy yield. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 3511–3523 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Santbergen, R. et al. Minimizing optical losses in monolithic perovskite/c-Si tandem solar cells with a flat top cell. Opt. Express 24, A1288–A1299 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Jost, M. et al. Efficient light management by textured nanoimprinted layers for perovskite solar cells. ACS Photonics 4, 1232–1239 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Cojocaru, L. et al. Detailed investigation of evaporated perovskite absorbers with high crystal quality on different substrates. ACS App. Mater. Interfaces 10, 26293–26302 (2018).

  28. 28.

    Momblona, C. et al. Efficient vacuum deposited pin and nip perovskite solar cells employing doped charge transport layers. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 3456–3463 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Gil‐Escrig, L. et al. Vacuum deposited triple‐cation mixed‐halide perovskite solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1703506 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Nogay, G. et al. 25.1%-efficient monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cell based on ap-type monocrystalline textured silicon wafer and high-temperature passivating contacts. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 844–845 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Sahli, F. et al. Fully textured monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells with 25.2% power conversion efficiency. Nat. Mater. 17, 820–826 (2018).

  32. 32.

    Hsiao, S. Y. et al. Efficient all‐vacuum deposited perovskite solar cells by controlling reagent partial pressure in high vacuum. Adv. Mater. 28, 7013–7019 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Raifuku, I. et al. Fabrication of perovskite solar cells using sputter-processed CH3NH3PbI3 films. Appl. Phys. Express 10, 094101 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Leyden, M. R. et al. High performance perovskite solar cells by hybrid chemical vapor deposition. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 18742–18745 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Yang, Z. et al. An up-scalable approach to CH3NH3PbI3 compact films for high-performance perovskite solar cells. Nano Energy 15, 670–678 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Zhang, Z. et al. CH3NH3PbI3 converted from reactive magnetron sputtered PbO for large area perovskite solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 163, 250–254 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Huang, J.-h et al. Direct conversion of CH3 NH3 PbI3 from electrodeposited PbO for highly efficient planar perovskite solar cells. Sci. Rep. 5, 15889 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Cui, X. P. et al. Electrodeposition of PbO and its in situ conversion to CH3NH3PbI3 for mesoscopic perovskite solar cells. Chem. Commun. 51, 1457–1460 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Cui, X.-P. et al. Electrodeposition of PbO and its in situ conversion to CH3 NH3 PbI3 for mesoscopic perovskite solar cells. Chem. Commun. 51, 1457–1460 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Lee, S.-W. et al. Sputtering of TiO2 for high-efficiency perovskite and 23.1% perovskite/silicon 4-terminal tandem solar cells. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2, 6263–6268 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Mastroianni, S. et al. Analysing the effect of crystal size and structure in highly efficient CH3 NH3 PbI3 perovskite solar cells by spatially resolved photo-and electroluminescence imaging. Nanoscale 7, 19653–19662 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Gundel, P., Heinz, F. D., Schubert, M. C., Giesecke, J. A. & Warta, W. Quantitative carrier lifetime measurement with micron resolution. J. Appl. Phys. 108, 033705 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Tseng, Z.-L. et al. Efficient inverted-type perovskite solar cells using UV-ozone treated MoOx and WOx as hole transporting layers. Sol. Energy 139, 484–488 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Chen, J. & Park, N.-G. Inorganic hole transporting materials for stable and high efficiency perovskite solar cells. Phys. Chem. C 122, 14039–14063 (2018).

  45. 45.

    Ali, F. et al. Prospects of e-beam evaporated molybdenum oxide as a hole transport layer for perovskite solar cells. J. Appl. Phys. 122, 123105 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Ong, K. P., Goh, T. W., Xu, Q. & Huan, A. Mechanical origin of the structural phase transition in methylammonium lead iodide CH3NH3PbI3. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 681–685 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Szafrański, M. & Katrusiak, A. Mechanism of pressure-induced phase transitions, amorphization, and absorption-edge shift in photovoltaic methylammonium lead iodide. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 3458–3466 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Zhang, L. et al. Strain induced electronic structure variation in methyl-ammonium lead iodide perovskite. Sci. Rep. 8, 7760 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Grote, C. & Berger, R. F. Strain tuning of tin–halide and lead–halide perovskites: a first-principles atomic and electronic structure study. J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 22832–22837 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Al-Shami, A. et al. Tuning the optical and electrical properties of orthorhombic hybrid perovskite CH3NH3PbI3 by first-principles simulations: strain-engineering. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 180, 266–270 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Chen, Q. et al. Planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells via vapor-assisted solution process. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 622–625 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Feng, J. Mechanical properties of hybrid organic-inorganic CH3NH3BX3 (B = Sn, Pb; X = Br, I) perovskites for solar cell absorbers. Apl. Mater. 2, 081801 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Wortman, J. & Evans, R. Young’s modulus, shear modulus, and Poisson’s ratio in silicon and germanium. J. Appl. Phys. 36, 153–156 (1965).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Song, I. et al. Potential of chemical rounding for the performance enhancement of pyramid textured p-type emitters and bifacial n-PERT Si cells. Curr. Appl. Phys. 18, 1268–1274 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Sun, S., Fang, Y., Kieslich, G., White, T. J. & Cheetham, A. K. Mechanical properties of organic–inorganic halide perovskites, CH3 NH3 PbX3 (X = I, Br and Cl), by nanoindentation. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 18450–18455 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Spina, M. et al. Mechanical signatures of degradation of the photovoltaic perovskite CH3NH3PbI3 upon water vapor exposure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 121903 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Hwang, J.-K. et al. Conformal perovskite films on 100 cm2 textured silicon surface using two-step vacuum process. Thin Solid Films 693, 137694 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This research was supported by the Technology Development Program to Solve Climate Changes of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (NRF-2017M1A2A2087351). This research was also supported by Korean Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) and the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea (no. 20173030014370).

Author information




S.-W.L. contributed to the overall project. S.B., J.-K.H., W.L., S.L., J.Y.H., K.C., and S.K. fabricated the precursors and perovskite solar cells, and performed several measurements and analyses. F.D.H. and M.C.S. conducted µ-PL and µ-LBIC 3D mapping analysis. S.B.C. and W.M.K. conducted ITO layer fabrication analysis. D.C., D.K., J.Y., and S.J.P. performed patterned silicon substrate fabrication and analysis. S.J. performed stress simulation and analysis. S.G., Y.K., H.-S.L., and D.K. directed the project. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hae-Seok Lee or Donghwan Kim.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, SW., Bae, S., Hwang, JK. et al. Perovskites fabricated on textured silicon surfaces for tandem solar cells. Commun Chem 3, 37 (2020).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing