Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Two-dimensional amine and hydroxy functionalized fused aromatic covalent organic framework


Ordered two-dimensional covalent organic frameworks (COFs) have generally been synthesized using reversible reactions. It has been difficult to synthesize a similar degree of ordered COFs using irreversible reactions. Developing COFs with a fused aromatic ring system via an irreversible reaction is highly desirable but has remained a significant challenge. Here we demonstrate a COF that can be synthesized from organic building blocks via irreversible condensation (aromatization). The as-synthesized robust fused aromatic COF (F-COF) exhibits high crystallinity. Its lattice structure is characterized by scanning tunneling microscopy and X-ray diffraction pattern. Because of its fused aromatic ring system, the F-COF structure possesses high physiochemical stability, due to the absence of hydrolysable weak covalent bonds.


Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are a class of crystalline macromolecular structures whose periodically linked building units extend into a framework with uniform topology and pores1,2,3,4. Unlike other more widely studied crystalline materials (e.g., graphene5 and boron nitride6), the COFs have a unique aspect in that their skeletons and pores can be precisely engineered, like those of metal organic frameworks (MOFs)1,7,8,9. Two-dimensional (2D) COFs can be divergently expanded into a π-conjugated structure by periodically integrating the building blocks9,10,11,12. Because of their ordered nature and 2D topology, COFs are seen as a dynamic and robust platform for the design of advanced functional materials, including a wide range of semiconductors11, and proton conductors13,14 for gas adsorption15,16,17, catalysis18,19,20,21 and energy conversion and storage applications22,23,24,25. The ability to generate crystalline organic materials with precise control of the framework at a molecular-level has been one of the most important recent developments in chemistry and materials science1,8,9.

In order to achieve high crystallinity in COFs, current methods typically rely on unstable bond formation using a reversible reaction to link monomer units by thermodynamic equilibria9,26. However, this beneficial intrinsic reversibility limits the COFs practical applications, because it leads to physiochemical instability4,27. COFs with boroxine or boronate linkages are prone to amorphization or disintegration in water or protic solvents4,27,28.

The prevailing class of COFs with relatively stable linkages, such as imine (-C=-) based COFs, exhibit enhanced hydrothermal stability29. Because of their reversible nature, however, under vigorous acidic conditions the chemical stability of most imine based COFs against hydrolysis is far from satisfactory30. To address the stability issue, and enable the fabrication of physiochemically robust COFs, a number of methodologies have been explored31,32,33,34,35. However, further exploration of new reticular chemistry is needed to synthesize stable COFs as reliable functional materials, and crucial to widen their practical applications.

The intrinsically important feature of COFs is their ability to form covalently linked stable aromatic ring systems, which are the basis of their exceptional electronic and magnetic properties36. In COFs, π–π interactions form porous layered frameworks3,27,37. However, typical COFs lack π–π interlayer interactions, and chemical stability, which limits their applications. Imine and boroxine based COFs, for example, are inferior when it comes to promoting π electron delocalization between the connecting units38. Despite a few examples of π-conjugated COFs, obtained using surface or interface-assisted synthesis10,39,40, the design and synthesis of fused aromatic ring-based π-conjugated COFs, which produces high crystallinity and structural stability in corrosive environments, remains a crucial challenge41.

To tackle this issue, a physiochemically robust yet fully conjugated fused aromatic COFs is highly desired, particularly to address long-standing challenges in semiconductor technology11,42.

Here, we report a fully conjugated fused aromatic 2D COF with aromatic amine (−NH2) and hydroxyl (−OH) functionalities in the pores. The fused aromatic COF allows inherently periodic ordering with extended π-electron delocalization and thus physiochemical stability. The process relies on the powerful polycondensation (aromatization) of pentaaminophenol (PAP) and hexaketocyclohexane (HKH) in trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (TFMSA) to yield fused aromatic phenazine-linked 2D COF (denoted F-COF, where F stands for fused, indicating the formation of fused aromatic pyrazine rings after the reaction between the ortho-diketone and ortho-diamine moieties).

Results and discussion

Synthesis and characterization of the F-COF

Figure 1 demonstrates the physiochemically stable structure of the entirely aromatic π-conjugated COF. PAP (Supplementary Methods) was chosen as a pseudo-C2-symmetric monomer, and HKH was chosen as a C3-symmetric monomer. Due to the formation of fused pyrazine rings in the network-forming reaction, crystalline F-COF was produced in quantitative yield even in solution, without surface and/or interfacial assistance (Fig. 1). The mixing of the monomers was carried out in TFMSA at −40 °C (melting temperature) to slow down the reaction kinetics between PAP and HKH to increase crystallinity. Thus far, a number of pyrazine-based crystalline COF structures have been reported by solution and solvothermal processes11,42,43,44,45,46. The F-COF was systematically characterized using various analytical techniques. Elemental analysis (EA) confirmed the formation of structure and exhibited experimental values that were very close to the theoretical values (Supplementary Table 1). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) indicated that the F-COF has good thermal stability in both nitrogen and air environments (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Fig. 1: Schematic illustration of the synthesis and structure of F-COF.

a The formation of F-COF from the reaction between pentaaminophenol (PAP) trihydrochloride and hexaketocyclohexane (HKH) in freshly distilled trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (TFMSA). Extended energy minimized eclipsed structures of F-COF: b top view; c side view. Color codes: C, gray; H, white; N, blue; O, red.

The qualitative bonding nature in F-COF was analyzed using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The XPS survey spectra revealed the presence of only three peaks, related to carbon (C 1s), nitrogen (N 1s), and oxygen (O 1s) (Supplementary Fig. 2a). The deconvoluted C 1s spectrum gave three peaks at 284.08, 285.31, and 286.74 eV, which are assignable to sp2 C–C, sp2 C–N, and C–OH/C–NH2, matching the structure well (Supplementary Fig. 2b). The high-resolution N 1s has two peaks at 398.55 and 399.97 eV corresponding to pyrazine-like nitrogen (sp2 N–C) and C–NH2 (Supplementary Fig. 2c). The deconvoluted oxygen (O 1s) in the structure is assigned to residual C=O (531.49 eV) at the edges and the phenolic C–OH (532.96 eV) in the structure (Supplementary Fig. 2d).

The formation of the F-COF was also detected by Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, which revealed the aromatic C=N, C=C stretching vibration at 1627 cm−1. Furthermore, the band at 1465 cm−1 is related to aromatic ring stretching vibration. The bands at 1387 and 1254 cm−1 can be attributed to C−N and C−O stretching vibrations. The band from 3129 to 3427 cm−1 is associated with the stretching vibration of the O–H and N–H bonds in the structure (Supplementary Fig. 3). The solid-state carbon 13 cross-polarization-magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (13C CP-MAS NMR) spectroscopy was exploited to investigate the chemical structure of the F-COF. Two intense peaks centered at 138.50 and 176.40 ppm are, respectively, related to the carbon atoms attached to nitrogen and edge ketonic groups (Supplementary Fig. 4). The bulk microstructure of the F-COF was studied with field-emission scanning microscopy (FE-SEM). SEM image showed the 2D layered morphology with a grain size of few tens of micrometers (Supplementary Fig. 5). High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) image also displayed sheet like texture (Supplementary Fig. 6). However, due to multi-layer stacking and beam damage, resolving structure was not possible11,43,44,45.

The crystalline nature of F-COF was resolved by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) analyses in combination with theoretical XRD simulations. The peak at 6.42° (2θ) can be assigned to the (100) plane of a crystalline hexagonal arrangement. The relatively strong peak at 27.05° is assignable to the (001) plane, which is related to the interlayer π–π stacking. The relatively broad PXRD peaks of the F-COF are associated with the less-ordered edges and extremely large molecular size of the F-COF along with poor stacking due to irreversibility of the reaction3,11,47,48 (Supplementary Note 1). The crystalline structure of F-COF was determined using XRD simulation and Pawley refinement in combination with experimental PXRD patterns (Fig. 2a). Structure based on a hexagonal lattice in the space group P3 was selected for F-COF.

Fig. 2: Powder X-ray diffraction study of F-COF.

a Experimental (red line), Pawley-refined pattern (black dash line), Bragg position (orange line), the difference plot (blue line), simulated AA-stacking model (pink line) and AB-stacking model (green line). b Crystallographic unit cells of F-COF with eclipsed AA-stacking model. c Staggered AB-stacking model. Color codes: C, gray; H, white; N, blue; O, red.

The unit cell parameters and simulated PXRD patterns were acquired (a = b = 16.6 Å, c = 3.30 Å) using the geometrical energy minimization of the structure by a universal force field. The PXRD pattern of the F-COF coincided well with the AA-stacking model (Fig. 2b), while the AB-stacking model deviated from the experimentally obtained profile (Fig. 2c). Figure 2a displays a comparison of the Pawley-refined XRD curve with the experimental one, which has small differences (Rwp = 3.48%, Rp = 5.44%). These results demonstrate the hexagonal ordering of the extended 2D structure along the x and y directions with 3.30 Å layer to layer distance in the z-axis.

Scanning tunneling microscopy imaging of the F-COF structure

A scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) study was performed to visualize the atomic structure of the F-COF. A single sheet of F-COF was prepared on a Cu(111) substrate under ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) by thermal evaporation at 600 K. The STM measurements were performed in UHV at a low temperature (77 K). Figure 3a is a high-resolution STM image of the F-COF on the Cu(111) substrate, showing the precise holey structure of the hexagonal array (Supplementary Note 2). The hole-to-hole distance, determined from the height profiles, was approximately 15.10 ± 0.15 Å, which matched well with the theoretical hole-to-hole distance.

Fig. 3: Scanning tunneling microscopy analysis and theoretical calculations.

a An atomic-resolution scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) topographic structure of F-COF on Cu(111) substrate. The STM image (5.4 × 5.4 nm2) was acquired at a sample bias of –0.2 V and a tunneling current of 20 pA. b Topographic height profile along the cyan blue dotted line, indicating a hole-to-hole distance of 1.51 nm. c Differential conductance (dl/dV) spectrum of F-COF.

The electronic structure of the F-COF was examined with scanning tunneling spectroscopy (STS) using lock-in detection mode. Two broad peaks appeared at −1.41 and 0.59 eV in the valence band and conduction band zones, respectively (Fig. 3c). The direct bandgap of the F-COF was empirically determined by Tauc plot from ultraviolet–visible (UV) spectroscopy (Supplementary Fig. 7). The value was found to be 2.00 eV, agreeing well with the STS result.

As the solution synthesized materials by polymerization have a wide range of molecular weight distribution from small to very large flakes sizes. It is almost impossible to synthesize macromolecular materials with the same molecular size and uniform molecular weight distribution. Thus, under UHV condition, it is possible to sublimate relatively smaller size flakes onto the cleaned Cu(111) substrate. From the STM we were able to observe different sizes of flake (Fig. 4) on Cu(111) substrate. During the STM characterization, we managed to see a small piece consisting of just two holes of the F-COF structure (Supplementary Fig. 8).

Fig. 4: STM images showing different sizes of F-COF flakes.

a STM image (36 × 36 nm2) acquired at a sample bias of –1.0 V and a tunneling current of 50 pA. b Image (9 × 9 nm2) acquired at a sample bias of –1.5 V and a tunneling current of 50 pA. Scale bar: a 7 nm; b 3 nm.

The stability of the F-COF was investigated by soaking the sample for 24 h in concentrated hydrochloric acid (HCl) and 6 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH). The PXRD results clearly indicate stability of the structure, showing no changes in the peak position before and after acid and base treatment (Supplementary Fig. 9).

In summary, we designed and synthesized one of the few pyrazine-based stable COFs11,42 reported to date via a wet-organic reaction. This physiochemically stable F-COF consists of all aromatic rings with a π-conjugated network structure and tunable functional groups. In contrast, the previously reported pyrazine-based COFs have no available functional groups11,42. The structure of the F-COF is visualized at atomic level by STM study, which reveals there are the same number of two different kinds of functional groups (−NH2 and −OH) in each hole. This suggests there is further modification potential (Supplementary Fig. 10) for numerous specific applications. The design and synthesis of F-COF may help in the synthesis of other tunable COFs with fully π-conjugated stable aromatic systems. We firmly anticipate these kinds of functionalized COFs can expedite further innovations and applications in the COF field, from wet-chemistry to device applications, such as organic electronics, energy conversion, and storage.


Synthesis of functionalized two-dimensional framework (F-COF)

PAP (2 g, 7.17 mmol) was charged in a three-necked round bottom flask under argon atmosphere and placed in a cold bath at −40 °C, and freshly distilled trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (TFMSA, 40 ml) was added. Then, HKH (1.49 g, 4.78 mmol) was slowly added while stirring at −40 °C for 4 h. The reaction flask was slowly allowed to warm up to room temperature for 3 h. The ice bath was replaced with oil bath and heated to 175 °C for 8 h. Then, the flask was cooled to room temperature and poured into water. The solid product that precipitated was collected by suction filtration using a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE, 0.5 μm) membrane. The resultant dark solid was further Soxhlet extracted with methanol and water, respectively, for 3 days each and freeze-dried at −120 °C under reduced pressure (0.05 mm Hg) for 3 days.

STM experiments

The STM experiments were performed in low-temperature HV at 77 K (SPECS JT-STM). The cleaned single crystal Cu(111) surface was prepared with a few cycles of Ar+ sputtering and annealing. After obtaining a cleaned Cu(111) substrate, an F-COF monolayer was deposited on the precleaned Cu(111) substrate by in situ thermal evaporation under UHV condition. The temperature of the Cu(111) was kept at room temperature and the F-COF evaporation temperature was about 600 K.


All the chemicals, reagents, and solvents were purchased from Aldrich Chemical Inc., unless otherwise stated. Solvents were degassed with nitrogen purging prior to use. All reactions were accomplished under nitrogen atmosphere using oven dried glassware.

EA was performed with a Thermo Scientific Flash 2000 Analyzer. Proton (1H) and carbon thirteen (13C) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded on an AVANCE III HD 400 MHz FT-NMR (Bruker) spectrometer for the monomer characterization. Solid-state NMR spectrum of F-COF was measured using powder sample on 600 MHz VARIAN FT-NMR (Agilent) at a spinning rate of 20 kHz. NMR spectra can be found in Supplementary Figs. 1117. Melting points were measured on a KSP1N automatic melting point meter (A. Krüss Optronic GmbH, Germany). High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were measured using JEOL/JMS-700. XPS was performed on an X-ray Photoelectron Spectrometer Thermo Fisher K-alpha (UK). X-ray diffraction (XRD) studies were taken on a High-Power X-Ray Diffractometer D/MAZX 2500 V/PC (Cu-Kα radiation, 35 kV, 20 mA, λ = 1.5418 Å) Rigaku, Japan at 40 kV and 200 mA at room temperature. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images were obtained with Pt- coated samples on carbon tape by a Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope Nanonova 230 (FEI Inc., USA). HR-TEM images were taken by a JEM-2100F microscope (JEOL inc., Japan) under an operating voltage of 200 keV. The samples were prepared by drop casting of dispersed ethanol on holey carbon TEM grid and dried in oven at 50 °C under vacuum. The TGA was carried using a Thermogravimetric Analyzer Q200 (TA Instrument, USA) at a heating rate of 10o min−1 in nitrogen and dry air atmosphere. Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were conducted on a Spectrum 100 (Perkin-Elmer, USA) with KBr pellet. XRD simulation and Pawley refinement were carried out using Materials studio modeling V. 7.0 (Accelrys, 2013). Pawley refinement was carried out to optimize the lattice parameter iteratively. The pseudo-Voigt function was exploited for whole profile fitting and the Berrar–Baldinozzi function was employed for to correct asymmetry during the refinement processes, until the Rp and Rwp values converged.

Data availability

All principal data with detailed experimental procedure and characterization of this work are included in this article and its Supplementary Information or are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Ding, S.-Y. & Wang, W. Covalent organic frameworks (COFs): from design to applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 548–568 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Waller, P. J., Gándara, F. & Yaghi, O. M. Chemistry of covalent organic frameworks. Acc. Chem. Res. 48, 3053–3063 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Feng, X., Ding, X. & Jiang, D. Covalent organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 6010–6022 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Côté, A. P. et al. Porous, crystalline, covalent organic frameworks. Science 310, 1166–1170 (2005).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Novoselov, K. S. et al. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306, 666–669 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Song, L. et al. Large scale growth and characterization of atomic hexagonal boron nitride layers. Nano Lett. 10, 3209–3215 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lohse, M. S. & Bein, T. Covalent organic frameworks: structures, synthesis, and applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1705553 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Huang, N., Wang, P. & Jiang, D. Covalent organic frameworks: a materials platform for structural and functional designs. Nat. Rev. Chem. 1, 16068 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Jin, Y., Hu, Y. & Zhang, W. Tessellated multiporous two-dimensional covalent organic frameworks. Nat. Rev. Chem. 1, 0056 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Jin, E. et al. Two-dimensional sp2 carbon-conjugated covalent organic frameworks. Science 357, 673–676 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Mahmood, J. et al. Nitrogenated holey two-dimensional structures. Nat. Commun. 6, 6486 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Mahmood, J. et al. Two-dimensional polyaniline (C3N) from carbonized organic single crystals in solid state. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 7414–7419 (2016).

  13. 13.

    Chandra, S. et al. Phosphoric acid loaded azo (−N═N−) based covalent organic framework for proton conduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 6570–6573 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Xu, H., Tao, S. & Jiang, D. Proton conduction in crystalline and porous covalent organic frameworks. Nat. Mater. 15, 722 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Huang, N., Chen, X., Krishna, R. & Jiang, D. Two-dimensional covalent organic frameworks for carbon dioxide capture through channel-wall functionalization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 2986–2990 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Doonan, C. J., Tranchemontagne, D. J., Glover, T. G., Hunt, J. R. & Yaghi, O. M. Exceptional ammonia uptake by a covalent organic framework. Nat. Chem. 2, 235 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Mahmood, J. et al. A robust 3D cage-like ultramicroporous network structure with high gas-uptake capacity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 3415–3420 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Xu, H., Gao, J. & Jiang, D. Stable, crystalline, porous, covalent organic frameworks as a platform for chiral organocatalysts. Nat. Chem. 7, 905 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Lin, S. et al. Covalent organic frameworks comprising cobalt porphyrins for catalytic CO2 reduction in water. Science 349, 1208–1213 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Fang, Q. et al. 3D microporous base-functionalized covalent organic frameworks for size-selective catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 2878–2882 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Vyas, V. S. et al. A tunable azine covalent organic framework platform for visible light-induced hydrogen generation. Nat. Commun. 6, 8508 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    DeBlase, C. R., Silberstein, K. E., Truong, T.-T., Abruña, H. D. & Dichtel, W. R. β-Ketoenamine-linked covalent organic frameworks capable of pseudocapacitive energy storage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 16821–16824 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Xu, F. et al. Radical covalent organic frameworks: a general strategy to immobilize open-accessible polyradicals for high-performance capacitive energy storage. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 6814–6818 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Mahmood, J. et al. An efficient and pH-universal ruthenium-based catalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 441 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Xu, J. et al. 2D frameworks of C2N and C3N as new anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 29, 1702007 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Huang, N. et al. Multiple-component covalent organic frameworks. Nat. Commun. 7, 12325 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Wan, S., Guo, J., Kim, J., Ihee, H. & Jiang, D. A photoconductive covalent organic framework: self-condensed arene cubes composed of eclipsed 2d polypyrene sheets for photocurrent generation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 5439–5442 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Côté, A. P., El-Kaderi, H. M., Furukawa, H., Hunt, J. R. & Yaghi, O. M. Reticular synthesis of microporous and mesoporous 2D covalent organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 12914–12915 (2007).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Segura, J. L., Mancheño, M. J. & Zamora, F. Covalent organic frameworks based on Schiff-base chemistry: synthesis, properties and potential applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 45, 5635–5671 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Qian, C. et al. Toward covalent organic frameworks bearing three different kinds of pores: the strategy for construction and COF-to-COF transformation via heterogeneous linker exchange. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 6736–6743 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kandambeth, S. et al. Construction of crystalline 2D covalent organic frameworks with remarkable chemical (acid/base) stability via a combined reversible and irreversible route. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 19524–19527 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kandambeth, S. et al. Enhancement of chemical stability and crystallinity in porphyrin-containing covalent organic frameworks by intramolecular hydrogen bonds. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 125, 13290–13294 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Chen, X. et al. Locking covalent organic frameworks with hydrogen bonds: general and remarkable effects on crystalline structure, physical properties, and photochemical activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 3241–3247 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Halder, A. et al. Ultrastable imine-based covalent organic frameworks for sulfuric acid recovery: an effect of interlayer hydrogen bonding. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 5797–5802 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wei, P.-F. et al. Benzoxazole-linked ultrastable covalent organic frameworks for photocatalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 4623–4631 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Xu, Y., Jin, S., Xu, H., Nagai, A. & Jiang, D. Conjugated microporous polymers: design, synthesis and application. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 8012–8031 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Wan, S., Guo, J., Kim, J., Ihee, H. & Jiang, D. A belt-shaped, blue luminescent, and semiconducting covalent organic framework. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 8826–8830 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Rao, M. R., Fang, Y., De Feyter, S. & Perepichka, D. F. Conjugated covalent organic frameworks via Michael addition–elimination. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 2421–2427 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Liu, W. et al. A two-dimensional conjugated aromatic polymer via C–C coupling reaction. Nat. Chem. 9, 563 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Liu, J. et al. Solution synthesis of semiconducting two-dimensional polymer via trimerization of carbonitrile. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 11666–11669 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Huang, N., Zhai, L., Xu, H. & Jiang, D. Stable covalent organic frameworks for exceptional mercury removal from aqueous solutions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 2428–2434 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Guo, J. et al. Conjugated organic framework with three-dimensionally ordered stable structure and delocalized π clouds. Nat. Commun. 4, 2736 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Meng, Z., Aykanat, A. & Mirica, K. A. Proton conduction in 2D aza-fused covalent organic frameworks. Chem. Mater. 31, 819–825 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Meng, Z., Stolz, R. M. & Mirica, K. A. Two-dimensional chemiresistive covalent organic framework with high intrinsic conductivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 11929–11937 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Wang, M. et al. Unveiling electronic properties in metal–phthalocyanine-based pyrazine-linked conjugated two-dimensional covalent organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 16810–16816 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Kou, Y., Xu, Y., Guo, Z. & Jiang, D. Supercapacitive energy storage and electric power supply using an aza-fused π-conjugated microporous framework. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 8753–8757 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Tilford, R. W., Mugavero, S. J., Pellechia, P. J. & Lavigne, J. J. Tailoring microporosity in covalent organic frameworks. Adv. Mater. 20, 2741–2746 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Nagai, A. et al. Pore surface engineering in covalent organic frameworks. Nat. Commun. 2, 536 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the Creative Research Initiative (CRI, 2014R1A3A2069102), BK21 Plus (10Z20130011057), Science Research Center (SRC, 2016R1A5A1009405), Basic Science Research (2018R1A2B6006423) and Young Researcher (2019R1C1C1006650) Programs through the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea, funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning.

Author information




J.-B.B. and J.M. conceived and designed the project. J.M., I.A., J.-M.S., S.-Y.Y., H.-J.N., and Y.H.K., carried out the synthesis and characterizations of monomers and organic framework. M.J. and H.-J.S. studied the STM characterization. J.M., H.-J.S. and J.-B.B. wrote the manuscript and all authors discussed the results and commented on the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hyung-Joon Shin or Jong-Beom Baek.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahmood, J., Ahmad, I., Jung, M. et al. Two-dimensional amine and hydroxy functionalized fused aromatic covalent organic framework. Commun Chem 3, 31 (2020).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing